Southern Region Riparian Tree and Shrub Planting - FY17
Project ID: 3591
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2017
Submitted By: 521
Project Manager: Nic Braithwaite
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Purchase bare root riparian trees and shubs and contract with the Utah Conservation Corps to plant riparian vegetation along streams where stream restoration work has recently occurred in the Southern Region.
Location:
Various locations in Beaver, Garfield, and Piute Counties where stream restoration/improvement work has already been implemented (e.g., installation of in-stream structures to reduce stress and erosion on stream banks, riparian fencing and grazing management plan to minimize exploitation of riparian vegetation from livestock use) and riparian vegetation is currently lacking.
Project Need
Need For Project:
One key factor for stream enhancement projects to be successful is the establishment of woody riparian vegetation. Woody riparian vegetation helps to stabilize stream banks, create valuable instream and near-stream habitat, directly and indirectly increase food production for fish and wildlife, and other numerous benefits.
Objectives:
The main goal of the project is to improve the condition and function of riparian corridors in the Southern Region. The main objective is to establish a healthy, diverse woody riparian vegetation community where none currently exist along important stream corridors in the Southern Region.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If the project is not funded, it will take longer for woody riparian vegetation to establish or some areas may never have the diversity of trees and shrubs necessary to significantly benefit wildlife and users. The absence of important woody riparian vegetation negatively impacts wildlife (e.g., poor habitat for sensitive species and game fish), reduces recreational opportunities (e.g., poor habitat related to riparian vegetation can be a limiting factor for popular game fish), leads to poor water quality (e.g., no buffer for nonpoint source of pollutants from overland flow), puts past stream enhancement efforts at risk (e.g., elevated rates of erosion could cause the loss of structures or other past enhancement work), etc. If the project is funded, there are no notable threats or risks. Similar projects have been funded and implemented in the past without any major problems and positive results.
Relation To Management Plan:
The project would address General Conservation Actions listed in the Utah Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy: 1. "Restore Degraded Habitats" - promote natural, healthy stream sinuosity and channel profiles, plant desirable vegetation, improve aquatic habitat for a variety of fish species, etc. 2."Control and Monitor Contaminants" - buffer nonpoint source contaminants from overland flow and reduce contaminant inputs from bank erosion (e.g., phosphorous). 3. "Increase/Secure In-stream Flow & Conservation Pools" - despite water loss associated with evapotranspiration, riparian plantings would have a positive impact on in-stream flow by promoting less variable, more natural stream flows and ground water recharge. 4. "Habitat Monitoring and Research" - riparian plantings would occur in areas that are being monitored and add to the knowledge base about the effects of habitat restoration on different species. The project would help to meet goals and objectives listed in the Upper Sevier Watershed Management Plan: 1. "Maintain or improve water quality and quantity for local needs while providing for the needs of recreation, fish and wildlife" - establish woody riparian vegetation where needed, decrease sediment flow into the river, etc. 2. "Provide suitable habitat for a diversity of wildlife species" - provide and protect quality fish habitat and recreational angling opportunities. 3. "Maintain and restore desired vegetation that is resilient and sustainable" - move vegetation communities closer to desired conditions. 4. "Maintain ranching and agricultural as sustainable economic, cultural and lifestyle components of the Upper Sevier Watershed" - riparian plantings along the Sevier River are done on private land in a manner that helps to "address potential and real conflicts between wildlife management goals and private land use". The project would help to achieve water quality and beneficial use goals cited in the Otter Creek -- East Fork Sevier TMDL Study: 1. "Stabilize channel banks" - reduce streambank erosion and promote stability. 2. "Increase filtering capacity" - buffer nonpoint sources of phosphorous (pollutant of concern) from overland flow. 3. "Protect waters for cold water species of game fish and other cold water aquatic life, including the necessary aquatic organisms in their food chain" - shift and maintain temperature and dissolved oxygen at suitable levels for cold water aquatic species. The project would implement conservation elements called for in the Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Southern Leatherside (Lepidomeda aliciae) in the State of Utah: 1. "Habitat Enhancement" - restore habitat conditions within the historical range of southern leatherside. 2. "Restore Hydrologic Conditions" - restore natural hydrologic characteristics and water quality (e.g., riparian buffer of nonpoint source pollutants). 3. "Range Expansion" - create suitable habitat conditions for potential reintroduction of southern leatherside to the lower Beaver River. The project would help to meet habitat-related objectives in the Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-grouse in Utah: 1. Riparian plantings would promote a healthy, functioning riparian habitat along the upper Sevier River and benefit late brood-rearing habitat for greater sage-grouse.
Fire / Fuels:
This project encourages a healthy riparian zone, which can provide a vegetation community and microclimate that may reduce the risk of fire to a limited degree and increase the potential use of these areas as control points and fuel/fire breaks.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The project has the potential to improve water quality. The project would occur in areas where a healthy community of riparian vegetation is currently lacking; such areas that are more likely to contribute pollutants to streams via both direct inputs (e.g., total phosporous in soil from eroding stream banks) and indirect pathways (e.g., pollutants entering streams from overland flow are not buffered, stream temperature fluctuations are greater because the microclimate associated with dense, healthy riparian vegetation does not exist). The project would help to establish and increase woody riparian vegetation abundance and diversity along important stream corridors in the Southern Region, which would then help with decreasing pollutants and improve water quality. There are limited pathways by which as project like this can impact water quantity. However, the project does promote reconnecting the stream with the floodplain and increasing water infiltration, both leading to ground water recharge and more consistent flows later into the season.
Compliance:
Archaeology clearance and NEPA would not be required. All planting would be done by hand and only involve small plants (e.g., willow stakes and bare root stock), the areas being planted are already highly disturbed from flooding and land use, and the majority of the project would occur on private land.
Methods:
Bare root trees and shrubs would be purchased from various nurseries depending on stock availability and price. The Utah Conservation Corps would be contracted to plant bare root stock and willow cuttings along stream corridors where past stream enhancement projects have been completed and woody riparian vegetation is still lacking. Planting projects would begin in April of 2017.
Monitoring:
Surveys of vegetation and fish population in the project areas are already being done and would be continued. Specifically, the UDWR monitors vegetation through periodic visual assessments of plantings and vegetation, game fish populations (i.e., brown trout, rainbow trout, and cutthroat trout) through electrofishing surveys, and native fish populations (e.g., southern leatherside) through seining surveys. Additionally, UDWQ has initiated multiple indicator monitoring (MIM) of stream channels and streamside vegetation at sites within the project areas. Fisheries biologists with the UDWR plan to work with UDWQ to aid and expand their monitoring efforts within the project areas.
Partners:
Multiple private landowners, agencies, and other stakeholders have been contacted, involved, and/or expressed support for the project. These partners were first contacted to gain input and support for the initial stream enhancement work (installation of in-stream structures, bank sloping, riparian fencing, etc.) and continue to be engaged in efforts to maintain and further improve upon the initial stream enhancement project. Specific examples of partners include multiple private landowners, local water users, BLM, UDWQ, and USU.
Future Management:
All of the areas are fenced and fences area actively maintained. Grazing is excluded along the riparian corridor in most of the areas. There are also grazing plans in place with the landowner or permittee in all areas to manage for establishment of woody riparian vegetation. Planting locations will be monitored and it will be determined if additional plantings are needed.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Livestock grazing occurs in the form of managed springtime grazing at most of the project locations. While the woody riparian vegetation that would be planted is intended to be beneficial for fish and wildlife and not necessarily high value for livestock (e.g., willow, cottonwood, water birch, red-osier dogwood, chokecherry, golden currant), it would help to provide some forage for livestock.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$9,300.00 $0.00 $9,300.00 $500.00 $9,800.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Hire Utah Conservation Corps for planting. $6,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Materials and Supplies Purchase bare root stock trees and shrubs. $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Motor Pool Regional vehicle mileage. $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Personal Services (permanent employee) UDWR employee supervision of the project. $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 2017
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$9,300.00 $0.00 $9,300.00 $500.00 $9,800.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
DNR Watershed N3622 $4,650.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Habitat Council Account HCRF $4,650.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 2017
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Brown Trout R2
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Waterfowl
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Project Comments
Comment 02/04/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Nic, 1)So how many of the areas to be planted are past WRI projects...in other words is this maintenance of past WRI projects? I am guessing at least some of it is. 2) Again healthy riparian areas moderating fire behavior? 3) MoUs with landowners? 4) How may sites have some sort of vegetation monitoring? 5) Maintaining your stream work will help alleviate channel downcutting threat from WAP in many of these areas. 6) Again fire fuels possible fire behavior effect 7) What is current condition of these planting areas? What has been responsible for past failures and how will this remedy? 8) I am having trouble seeing which all projects you have mapped on the WRI database can you list them? Thanks!
Comment 02/08/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Nic Braithwaite
Hi Mike, 1) The majority of the areas to be planted are within past WRI projects (e.g., #2763, #2648, #1726, #1461, #1093, #904, #833, #558). 2) I've added a statement to the section on Fire/Fuels in Project Details to address the degree to which the project might impact fire behavior. 3) Most of the plantings on private property are a form of maintenance of past projects and there is a written agreement to manage factors like grazing in a way that will not significantly impact the riparian vegetation in a negative way (e.g., no grazing for five years after stream improvement work is completed, followed by limited spring time grazing). 4) I'm not aware of any formal, quantitative vegetative monitoring in the sites along the lower Beaver River or Otter Creek, though the UDWR does have photo points and terse, qualitative assessments that are done in conjunction with electrofishing surveys. The UDWQ has some more robust vegetation monitoring along the upper Sevier River and East Fork of the Sevier River (e.g., Multiple Indicator Monitoring, measuring canopy cover with a densitometer), in addition to the UDWR photo points and qualitative assessments. 5) I've updated the "Habitats" section. 6) I've added a statement to the section on Fire/Fuels in Project Details to address the degree to which the project might impact fire behavior. 7) Generally, conditions in planting areas are thought to be suitable for establishment of woody riparian vegetation and past planting efforts have been fairly successful, despite the areas still seeming to lack woody riparian vegetation. The two main reasons for past failures are inadequate initial plantings and poor livestock management. The remedy to the first is simply additional plantings and the latter has been addressed through fencing (e.g., there has been a lot of fence maintenance over the past few years, thanks in large part to #3410, #3034, and #2648) and communication with landowner (e.g., in one location grazing was not occurring as agreed to prior to stream improvement work, but the landowner has since changed who leases the property for grazing to address the problem). 8) Sorry, it is hard to see where the projects are located. There are four general areas: lower Beaver River, upper Sevier River, and East Fork of the Sevier River, and Otter Creek. You should be able to start seeing the features if you zoom in to the area downstream of Minersville Reservoir, the area near Hatch, and the area upstream and downstream of Otter Creek Reservoir. Thanks for the comments and let me know if you need more information or have other questions. Nic
Completion
Start Date:
03/27/2017
End Date:
04/20/2017
FY Implemented:
2017
Final Methods:
Bare root trees and shrubs were be purchased from various nurseries. The Utah Conservation Corps was hired to plant the bare root stock and willow cuttings on stream enhancement projects that have been completed in the past and other appropriate areas that have proper livestock grazing management in place. Planting projects were completed in April 2017.
Project Narrative:
The project was implemented as planned. There were no significant problems, difficulties, etc. The partnership with landowners was beneficial to the project and utilizing a UCC crew to do the plantings seemed to be effective.
Future Management:
All of the areas are fenced and fences area actively maintained. Grazing is excluded along the riparian corridor in most of the areas. There are also grazing plans in place with the landowner or permittee in all areas to manage for establishment of woody riparian vegetation. Planting locations will be monitored and it will be determined if additional plantings are needed.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
5040 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
Project Map
Project Map