Birdseye WMA Bullhog Project
Project ID: 3605
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2017
Submitted By: 18
Project Manager: Mark Farmer
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Central Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Central
Description:
Bullhog 357 acres of old chainings on the Birdseye WMA
Location:
Birdseye WMA in southern Utah county T10S, R3E, Sec 24,25
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Birdseye WMA provides important winter range for mule deer and elk. The property was anchor chained in 1972 and surviving pinyon and juniper trees are regaining their dominance. Trees are to large for a lop and scatter project and to small for an effective anchor chaining. The understory of seeded perennial grasses and a few forbs is still in good condition and no additional seeding will be necessary. Shrubs are limited on most of the chained areas and need to be increased. Eliminating much of the pinyon and juniper competition will improve soil moisture for the surviving shrubs.
Objectives:
Reduce pinyon and juniper cover to less than 10% in treatment polygons. Establish 500 shrubs per acre on treated polygons by the end of the 3rd growing season.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The pinyon and juniper trees are currently in phase 2 but will transition to phase 3 without treatment. The understory will be reduced and the few surviving sagebrush will be lost. Hazardous fuels are increasing as pinyon and juniper trees increase in cover and density. There are two private residences adjacent to the WMA and a power line running through the property.
Relation To Management Plan:
Birdseye Bullhog Project plans Project will help meet 17 goals, objectives and strategies from the following plans. This project will improve winter and transitional range for mule deer and elk. The project will address some of the objectives in the Utah Elk plan. * Habitat Objective 1. Maintain elk habitat throughout the state by identifying and protecting existing crucial elk habitat and mitigating for losses due to human impacts. * Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of forage and cover on 250,000 acres of elk habitat with emphasis on calving habitat and upper elevation elk winter range by the end of this plan. The project will help achieve some of the objective of the Utah Mule Deer plan. * Habitat Objective 1. Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting existing critical habitats and mitigating for losses due to human impacts. * Habitat Objective 2. Improve the quality of forage and vegetation for mule deer on 200,000 acres of critical range. The proposed project will address some of the limiting factors and habitat management strategies outlined in the deer management plan for herd unit 16 Central mountains including: HABITAT MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES - Deer Plan * Protect, maintain, and/or improve deer habitat through direct range improvements to support and maintain herd population management objectives. HABITAT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES * Continue to improve, protect, and restore sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer. Cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvements such as pinion-juniper removal, reseedings, controlled burns, grazing management, water developments etc. on public and private lands. Habitat improvement projects will occur on both winter ranges as well as summer range. This project will also address some of the objectives and strategies listed in the elk management plan for unit 16 Central mountains including: UNIT MANAGEMENT GOALS - Elk Plan * Manage for a population of healthy animals capable of providing a broad range of recreational opportunities, including hunting and viewing. Consider impacts of the elk herd on other land uses and public interests, including private property rights, agricultural crops and local economies. Maintain an elk population consistent with the available range resources and which is in balance with other range users such as domestic livestock, other big game and the need for watershed protection. * Maintain and enhance existing elk habitat through vegetative manipulation, sound domestic grazing practices, and other management techniques that will meet habitat objectives UNIT MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES * Protect and maintain existing habitats that are functioning properly. Enhance elk habitat on a minimum of 20,000 acres during the next 5 years through direct range improvements. This will include the following specific objectives. * Remove pinion-juniper encroachment into winter range sagebrush parks and summer and transitional range mountain brush communities. Approximately 2,000 acres per year will be targeted using primarily mechanical treatments. The proposed projects will address the following goals and objectives of the Division of Wildlife Resources most recent strategic management plan: Resource Goal: expand wildlife populations by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. Objective 1: protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. Constituency Goal: Achieve broad-based support for Division programs and budgets by demonstrating the value of wildlife to all citizens of Utah. Objective 2: improve communication with wildlife organizations, public officials, private landowners, and government agencies to obtain support for Division programs. * The Utah Smoke Management Plan (1999, 2006 revision). By using mechanical mastication this plan will accomplish Goal #5, Use of alternative methods to burning for disposing of or reducing the amount of wildland fuels. * State of Utah Hazard Mitigation Plan (March 2011) this plan accomplishes statewide goals including 1) Protection of natural resources and the environment, when considering mitigation measures and 2) Minimize the risk of wildfire (p12). The project will also help meet the goals and objectives of the Spanish Fork River Coordinated Resource Management plan including: * Reduce sediment coming from uplands by over 5,000 tons/year by applying BMP's on 16,000 acres of rangelands.
Fire / Fuels:
The treatment will reduce the possibility of a catastrophic wildfire in this area. If a fire starts on the property the bullhog treatment will reduce flame length, fire intensity and eliminate the possibility of a crown fire. There is a powerline that runs through the property and 2 private residences adjacent to the property. The house to the north of the WMA will be within 400 feet of the bullhog treatment which will provide an effective fuel break for the residence.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The project will result in a significant decrease in water used by pinyon and juniper trees on the Birdseye WMA. It is estimated that a mature pinyon can use up to 33 liters of water per day and juniper up to 32 liters per day. Range trend data on the WMA estimates about 200 juniper trees per acre on a chained area. Estimating a minimum of 150 trees/acre over the 259 acres of the project and removing about 80% of the trees in the chaining, this project will remove approximately 43,000 trees. That is a considerable savings in soil moisture which can then be used by other plants. The reduction in tree cover and increase in grass cover will result in a decrease in soil erosion which will improve water quality in the nearby Thistle creek.
Compliance:
The treatment areas were previously disturbed with an anchor chaining project in 1972.
Methods:
Use the DWR bullhog to remove 80% of the pinyon and juniper trees in treatment polygons. Leave scattered clumps and islands of trees for cover for mule deer and other wildlife. Utilize a dribbler on the bullhog tracks to plant shrub seed.
Monitoring:
A Range Trend study 16B-5 Jackson Unit, is within the project and can be used to provide pre and post treatment photos, data and wildlife use.
Partners:
DWR: The project area is managed by the DWR central region. MDF: MDF reviewed proposal and they support the project which will improve mule deer habitat in this area. FFSL: Project proposal was discussed with FFSL fuels committee and they support the project which will reduction hazardous fuels.
Future Management:
The project area is on the Birdseye Wildlife Management area and will continue to be managed as deer and elk winter range.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The project will result in an increase in herbaceous forage for wildlife and domestic livestock. Livestock grazing is used as a management tool on the property to improve winter range for wildlife.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$33,600.00 $0.00 $33,600.00 $1,080.00 $34,680.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Seasonal labor for 1200 hrs @ $15/hr $18,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Motor Pool Motor pool costs for 7200 miles @ $0.50/mi $3,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Materials and Supplies Fuel for bullhog and mics supplies and repairs estimated at $100/day x 120 days. $12,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Personal Services (permanent employee) Project flagging and administration $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 2017
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$33,600.00 $0.00 $33,600.00 $1,080.00 $34,680.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) NS6523 $1,171.39 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) NS6525 $585.70 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) NS6527 $585.70 $0.00 $0.00 2018
MDF Expo Permit ($1.50) NS6553 $1,591.19 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) NS6523 $8,828.61 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) In-kind permanent employee time spent on project $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 2017
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) NS6525 $4,414.30 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) NS6527 $4,414.30 $0.00 $0.00 2017
MDF Expo Permit ($1.50) NS6553 $12,008.81 $0.00 $0.00 2017
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Habitats
Habitat
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Project Comments
Comment 02/01/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Habitat Shifting and Alteration might be the wrong threat to claim - that's a Level 2 threat under Climate Change. Its finer-level threats are stream temp increase, and droughts (as in, increased and/or intensified droughts due to climate change). I do actually think your proposal and others like it will help increase native-plant community resilience to intensified drought (e.g. by increasing plant-available soil water for use by the perennial understory). But, perhaps you would rather - or also - use the threats "problematic native species - plants" and "inappropriate fire regime" instead?
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Approved to go forward to ranking - CRO UPCD
Comment 02/18/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Monson Shaver
A cultural resource inventory is not required for previously disturbed ground.
Comment 01/05/2016 Type: 2 Commenter: Tyler Thompson
Mark - you need to clean up your shapefile...it's showing slivers of treatment area on USFS and private. We're trying to minimize this slop over in the new system
Comment 08/15/2018 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion report before the deadline. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion.
Completion
Start Date:
09/26/2016
End Date:
12/21/2017
FY Implemented:
2018
Final Methods:
Used DWR skid steer type bullhog to thin 229 acres of old chaining areas on the Birdseye WMA. Removed most juniper trees in old chaining polygons, leaving trees in gully bottoms and scattered pockets. Left most pinyon pine trees untreated. Dribbled bitterbrush and fourwing saltbush seed with dribblers on the bullhog tracks.
Project Narrative:
The tree density was high on this project which took a lot more time to complete than previously thought. Terrain was also a challenge. Some of the chained areas were to steep for the bullhog to safely operate. Those areas had to be left untreated. Most of the pinyon trees on the project were left. Most of the juniper trees within the old chaining polygons were removed.
Future Management:
This property will be managed similarly to how it has been managed in the past. There is still a grazing agreement with the neighboring land owner to the south to graze 50 AUMs which expires in 2020.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
6886 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Skid steer
Project Map
Project Map