Spanish Fork River Channel and Bank Habitat Improvements
Project ID: 3676
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2017
Submitted By: 201
Project Manager: Jordan Nielson
PM Agency: Trout Unlimited
PM Office: National Office
Lead: Trout Unlimited
WRI Region: Central
Description:
This project proposes the following restoration activities focused in the Spanish Fork Sports Park Complex: Instream structure installation for bank stabilization and value added fish habitat, removal of invasive plant species, native vegetation planting, and the coordination of volunteer events for the City of Spanish Fork, Trout Unlimited volunteers, Dedicated Hunters, as well as local business and schools.
Location:
The Spanish Fork River flows east to west through Spanish Fork Canyon to Utah Lake and is formed by the confluence of Soldier and Thistle Creeks. This project will take place within the city limits of Spanish Fork in the Sports Complex Park on the west side of the City of Spanish Fork.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Like many rivers throughout Utah, the morphology of the Spanish Fork River has been shaped by the need to use water for irrigation and by the encroachment of urban spread and agricultural practices. As such, the river channel has been shaped through attempts to reduce the impacts of flooding and improve water conveyance to users. The effect has been the creation of a trapezoidal channel that, while maintaining some meanders, looks more like a canal than a river and is disconnected from its natural floodplain. The disconnection with the floodplain theoretically increases the magnitude of flood damage potential as flow energy cannot be dissipated. The brown trout fishery has remained viable in the river despite the changes made by human activities but does not flourish. The river is highly accessible as it flows through Spanish Fork City and the placement of up to ten j-hook and cross vanes throughout the one mile reach that flows through the Spanish Fork Sports Complex will aid in creating habitat that will benefit the fish population. These structures will aid in creating areas that are easily fishable from the shore along the trail. The Sports Complex hosts numerous sporting events for people coming from all over Utah but lacks the ability to provide much in the way of non-traditional sports. By enhancing the river through the park a section of the population that normally does not use this area can find other ways to recreate within the enhanced river habitat. Furthermore, using rock vane structures creates reconnection to the floodplain and will decrease the severity of flood damage by allowing the energy of the flowing water to be dissipated by the riparian vegetation. IN addition to the need for reconnecting the river to its floodplain, several species of invasive vegetation exist throughout the river corridor including Russian olive, tamarisk, and Siberian elm. These species are large water consumers and need to be removed and replaced by native vegetation that requires less water. Native vegetation can dissipate flood energy and provide the opportunity to keep a little more water in the stream channel throughout the remainder of the year through reduced water consumption. This in effect will also reduce the need of the city to maintain expensive trail infrastructure should flooding occur. Community stewardship for the river corridor is expected to increase with beautification of the stream channel and increased opportunities for recreation near homes
Objectives:
The primary objective of this project is to increase engagement by volunteers throughout the Spanish Fork River Basin by coordinating community-based actions designed to complement and sustain our current restoration work. Key actions include reconnecting the river with the floodplain, diversifying fish habitat, planting native riparian trees, and removing invasive riparian species along the Spanish Fork River.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Risks associated with completion of a bank and channel habitat restoration project are minimal to nil. However, the risks of allowing the Spanish Fork River to remain in it's current condition may allow excessive flooding damage in high water years and risk private property damage along the stretch of river running through the Spanish Fork Sports Complex. Furthermore, while Utah Lake does not have an EPA approved TMDL, studies show that there is 21.2 tons/year of phosphorous loading from the Spanish Fork River, the highest of any natural water source in Utah Lake. It also contributes over 60,000 tons of total dissolved solids, second only to the Provo River. Bank stabilization and floodplain reconnection are critical to reducing these water quality contaminants.
Relation To Management Plan:
A Consolidated Resource Management Plan has been completed for the portion of the Spanish Fork River from the crossing under Interstate 15 to the interface with Utah Lake. The CRMP outlines bank restoration and stabilization for the benefit of agricultural uses and the endangered June sucker. The objectives of Spanish Fork City are to ensure the stabilization of the banks of the Spanish Fork through their parks, which would include the portion through the Spanish Fork Sports Complex. In 2005 Utah Division of Wildlife Resources completed a streambank stabilization project much higher in the drainage at the Utah County Spanish Fork River Park. The UDWR project evidences positive effects to native species as well as trout.
Fire / Fuels:
There are no effects on fire or fuels for this project.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Floodplain reconnection and bank stabilization in the Spanish Fork River will reduce the current total phosphorous and total dissolved solids loading in Utah Lake preventing the possibility of a TMDL listing into the future. Current total phosphorous loading from the Spanish Fork River in Utah Lake is 21.2 tons/year, representing the highest phosphorous loading of any naturally flowing water source to the lake. Current total dissolved solid load is 60,500 tons/year, second only to the Provo River.
Compliance:
All appropriate Division of Water Quality and Army Corp of Engineers permits will be obtained prior to starting the project.
Methods:
Up to ten j-hook rock vanes will be placed throughout the one mile stretch of river that flows through the Spanish Fork Sports Complex to reconnect the channel with the flood plain and narrow the channel to the appropriate conveyance size for transport of sediment. Throughout the surrounding acreage in the park and the trail that runs adjacent to the river invasive plants will be removed. Willows, shrubs, grasses, and sedges will replace the non-native vegetation at a ration of at least 1:1.
Monitoring:
Monitoring of vegetation will occur annually to ensure the success of plantings and the recession of invasives. Monitoring of the fish population will occur annually for the first three years and then every 3-5 years following.
Partners:
Trout Unlimited Utah Division of Wildlife Resources - Central Region Aquatics City of Spanish Fork
Future Management:
Monitoring of vegetation will occur annually to ensure the success of plantings and the recession of invasives. Monitoring of the fish population will occur annually for the first three years and then every 3-5 years following. Fishing and other recreation will be promoted on the Spanish Fork River by the City of Spanish Fork, Trout Unlimited, and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
This does not apply to this project but may apply to future phases.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 $10,000.00 $110,000.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Stream Restoration Design Engineering $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $2,000.00 2017
Equipment Rental/Use Trackhoe rental $4,999.99 $4,999.99 $0.00 2017
Materials and Supplies Small tools for vegetation removal and chipping and replanting. $789.00 $789.00 $0.00 2017
Materials and Supplies Container stock of rushes, sedges, and shrubs $3,145.00 $3,145.00 $0.00 2017
Materials and Supplies Boulders for instream structures $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2017
Contractual Services Utah Conservation Corp - Invasive Vegetation removal and chipping $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 2017
Motor Pool 2906 miles @ 0.57/mi $828.21 $828.21 $0.00 2017
Contractual Services Eight weeks salary and benefits for TU project lead. In kind project management frmo DWR and Spanish Fork City $9,292.80 $9,292.80 $6,000.00 2017
Materials and Supplies Chipper for plant removal. Water stinger for willow planting $3,945.00 $3,945.00 $0.00 2017
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$10,000.00 $50,000.00 $60,000.00 $10,000.00 $70,000.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Spanish Fork City Spanish Fork City will aid in the supervision of volunteer work and completion of engineering of rock vanes. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2017
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) In-kind support will be given by the Central Region Aquatics Staff in the form of on-the-ground supervision of volunteers and contractors. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2017
Habitat Council Account HCRF $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017
National Fish & Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) The NFWF grant is written to cover two DWR fiscal years, FY17 and FY18. $0.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 2017
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Fishing and Harvesting Aquatic Resources High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Brown Trout R2
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
June Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
June Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
June Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Low
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Low
Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo N3
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo N3
Threat Impact
Hiking / Foot Travel Low
Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo N3
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Project Comments
Comment 01/20/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Terri Pope
I just thought you should be aware that there have been Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo sightings along this stretch of the river within the past 2-3 years and take to that into consideration with your project planning.
Comment 01/21/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Thank you. I was not aware that WYBC would inhabit that close to an urban area. Fortunately within the scope of this project there are already an abundance of mature cottonwood trees that would continue to provide habitat for them. We will defeinitely take food sources into consideration when removing Russian olive.
Comment 01/27/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Brad Jessop
Jordan, will you please post your email address so I can include you on the Central Region email list? Thanks.
Comment 01/27/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Hi Brad, my email is jnielson@tu.org. Do you have a date when you will be hearing project presentations?
Comment 02/01/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Chris Crockett
The potential leatherside chub population within the reach would be "Southern", not "Northern". You might touch base with some of the NRCS contacts on the Lower Spanish Fork CRMP if you'd like a second opinion on restoration design. Cheers
Comment 02/01/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Thanks Chris! I made the change.
Comment 02/01/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Thanks for the proposal. I'd just suggest looking at the threats to species and habitats, and removing any that this project does not address. For example, a threat mentioned for BCT is basically "fishing". Whether that's true or not is a separate issue - but I think your proposal aims to increase fishing access, not reduce it. So...I don't think that particular threat is one you should include here. Look at the others too - there may be more, there may not.
Comment 02/01/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Thanks Jimi. After going through this process with the SER UPCD I think some training on those threats is in order. It is not entirely clear how to handle all of those threats. Are they threats that will be addressed or threats that could be created by the project?
Comment 02/01/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Also, this project aims to improve habitat that will benefit the recruitment of all fish species and reduce the impact of fishing pressure in the future.
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Approved to go forward to ranking - CRO UPCD
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 1 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Thank you
Comment 09/26/2017 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Will you update your map features to show what was completed this year and not what is planned in total? From your completion form it sounds like the portion that was completed with this phase was woody veg removal and herbicide treatment. You don't need to have a map feature for the concept design. When you have completed that please go back to the Completion Form and finalize your report again so I know that it has been completed. Thanks.
Comment 09/29/2017 Type: 2 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Thanks Alison. The actual polygon didn't change that much but it is updated.
Comment 10/02/2017 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Did you do any seedling planting in this phase of the project? The map shows that there was but there is no mention of it in the completion form. If not you can go in and modify the map feature and just delete the seedling treatment action.
Comment 10/02/2017 Type: 2 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
There will be within the next couple of weeks but with a different funding source. I'll take it off the treatments on the map since it didn't happen within the State FY for this project.
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 3 Commenter: Alan Clark
Should the first $5000 in-kind in your funding be attributed to the City rather than TU since they will provide the supervision?
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 3 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Spanish Fork City should be listed instead of TU. The city was not an available entity when I entered the budget so I entered TU as a placeholder and requested Spanish Fork be on the list of available partners in the database. If the city is available in the database now we can change it from TU to Spanish Fork.
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 3 Commenter: Tyler Thompson
I've changed it to Spanish Fork
Comment 02/02/2016 Type: 3 Commenter: Jordan Nielson
Thanks Tyler
Completion
Start Date:
04/10/2017
End Date:
06/30/2017
FY Implemented:
2017
Final Methods:
1. Utah Conservation Corp Crews were hired for one week in April 2017 to remove Russian olive, tamarisk, perennial pepperweed, scotch thistle, and phragmites from the north side of the one mile reach of the Spanish Fork River that flows through the Spanish Fork Sports complex. All vegetation was removed and chipped by Spanish Fork City. Stumps were treated with Garlon or Tordon as per standard operating procedures for woody invasives removal. 2. River Restoration.org was hired to develop a concept plan for implementing stream restoration from the mouth of Spanish Fork canyon to the I-15 bridge over the Spanish Fork River. Documents provided.
Project Narrative:
The Spanish Fork River, like many rivers in the State of Utah , has long been a source of agriculture irrigation. Additionally, as the city of Spanish Fork has developed and population has grown, property along the river has become desirable for development. Due to these factors and many others including misguided attempts at flood control, the Spanish Fork river has lost much of its natural channel geomorphology. In addition to losses to stream structure, invasive species now populate the limited riparian area. Invasive species removal is a great place to start with a restoration project because results are evident immediately and it generally doesn't require excessive permitting. TU employees began meeting with Utah Division of Wildlife Resources in the winter of 2016 to plan details of the invasive species removal portion of the project and began to develop a concept plan with River Restoration.org. Utah Conservation Corp Crew-Leaders-in-Training spent one week on the project from April 10-14. They used chainsaw and loppers to remove vegetation along 1/2 mile of the north bank of the river from Spanish Fork Main Street into the Sports Park Complex. They removed all of the vegetation from the vicinity as per the City of Spanish Fork request to an area where the city chipped the woody vegetation and burned the phragmites removed. In the meantime, TU and DWR employees met with River Restoration.org engineers and environmental scientists to begin the concept for stream restoration. Draft restoration reports were delivered in late summer 2017 and are currently being reviewed by all partners.
Future Management:
The Watershed Restoration Initiative funding was only a small piece of the funding for the Spanish Fork River restoration project. The project will continue to develop the concept restoration plan and TU, DWR, and Spanish Fork City will continue invasive removal effort and seek funding and permitting to pursue instream alterations. Utah Conservation Corp Crews are planned to return in October 2017 to continue these efforts as well as lead volunteer native vegetation planting efforts.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
6163 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
6163 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
6163 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
6163 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
6163 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Mechanical removal
Project Map
Project Map