Upper Provo RX Prep
Project ID: 3902
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2018
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Riley Bergseng
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Spanish Fork Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
Within the project area, a 6,007 acre block near Shingle Creek has been identified for treatment by prescribed fire. Prescribed fire is scheduled to be implemented fall 2018. The perimeter of the prescribed fire along the east and west flanks need prep work; including hazard tree removal and shaded fuel break removing ladder fuels along roadways. This would be along upper setting road and Norway flats road.
Location:
west of Norway flats rd, east of upper setting rd, north of hwy 150.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Prescribed Fire-Over a period of up to 10 years, the proposed actions would move rangelands and forestlands toward conditions that more closely represent the historic vegetative composition and structure. These actions would reduce tree densities by opening the tree canopy, retaining the healthier, larger, and more fire-tolerant trees, and re-introducing the primary natural disturbance mechanism (fire). Fireline Preparation- Critical to the success of implementing the RX.
Objectives:
Thin 100 ft both sides of FS rd 088 and 035. West and East side of RX boundary are surrounded by road system that need to be thinned to safely implement RX. This would entail taking all ladder fuels and hazard trees that will create holding problems for fire resources when implementing the RX
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
* Upper Setting FS RD 088 and Norway Flats FS RD 035 are heavily used recreation arteries, and public/firefighter safety is at risk during prescribed fire if prep work is not complete before RX occurs. Reducing hazardous fuels along the corridor will help mitigate firefighter/public safety issue.
Relation To Management Plan:
-The Upper Provo Restoration Project falls within the Western Uintas Management Area. Vegetation management activities in the project area center on trying to improve soil, water, and vegetation conditions within the Upper Provo Watershed to restore the overall watershed health; the proper functioning of physical, biological and chemical conditions. -Biodiversity/Viability Desired future conditions for Vegetation and Disturbance Processes for the Western Uintas Management Area (USDA Forest Service, 2003; 4-179) include: -Beaver Creek Area: Mechanical thinning of invading species (such as Juniper and Gambel Oak) followed by prescribed fire or mastication will be employed to maintain the unique Ponderosa pine component of the landscape. Gambel oak and mountain brush will be managed to increase age class diversity and reduce fuel loading adjacent to private property. Sagebrush will be managed to increase the diversity of age classes and decrease canopy cover of juniper, as a consequence increase grass-forb cover. Social (non-recreation) Desired Future Conditions for the Western Uintas Management Area include (USDA Forest Service, 2003; 4-190): -Risks to private property from unwanted fire will be reduced through close coordination with local communities. In the Soapstone and Weber River summer home areas, permit holders, The State of Utah Department of Natural Resources and private homeowners will work Cooperatively to provide fuel breaks and defensible space. -Forest-wide Subgoals (USDA Forest Service, 2003) that are applicable to this project and fuels/fire ecology are: -2h. Maintain and/or restore diversity, productivity, vigor, and regenerative capacity of native and desired non-native riparian and wetland plant communities to provide an amount and distribution of large woody debris characteristic of natural aquatic & riparian ecosystems; provide adequate summer & winter thermal regulation; and to help achieve rates of surface erosion and channel migration characteristic of those under which desired communities develop. -3d. Restore or maintain fire-adapted ecosystems (consistent with land uses, historic fire regimes, and other Forest Plan direction) through wildland fire use, prescribed fire, timber harvest or mechanical treatments. -3f. Maintain or restore species composition, such that the species that occupy any given site are predominantly native species in the kind and amount that were historically distributed across the landscapes. 4d. Reduce hazardous fuels (prescribed fire, silvicultural and mechanical treatments) with emphasis on interface communities (wildland/urban) and increase proactive participation of communities at risk. -Forest Guidelines and Desired Conditions applicable to this project and fuels/fire ecology include: -Minimize the amount and impact of smoke from "fire use" activities by identifying smoke-sensitive areas, using "best available control measures," monitoring smoke impacts, and following guidance in State smoke management plans. -Manage vegetation for properly functioning condition at the landscape scale. Desired structure and pattern for cover types of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest are as follows except in the Wildland Urban Interface, where vegetation structure and pattern should be managed to reduce threat of sever fire to property and human safety. =(G3.1A-1) Timber harvest, vegetation/fuel treatments, prescribed fire, and wildland fire use are allowed only for the purposes of maintaining, improving or restoring riparian and aquatic habitat to desired conditions or to protect property in the wildland urban interface -(G3.1W-1) Vegetation/fuel treatment, prescribed fire, and wildland fire use are allowed for the purposes of maintaining, improving or restoring watersheds to desired conditions, and to protect property in the wildland urban interface. -(G3.2U-1) Vegetation/fuel treatment, prescribed fire and wildland fire use are allowed for the purposes of maintaining, improving or restoring terrestrial habitat, for hazardous fuel reduction, and to protect property in the wildland urban interface. -Deer Herd Unit Management Plan- Deer Herd Unit #7 (Kamas) The limiting factor for big game in this management unit is the lack of adequate amounts of good quality winter range. There are areas that are experiencing juniper encroachment and are in need of treatments to address this problem. Issues: juniper encroachment and annual grass competition reducing the amount of browse species available to wintering wildlife. -Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan 2014 The project is designated crucial summer range for Mule Deer. Section IV Statewide management goals and objectives. This project will address Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2013 (p11-12). Strategy F. Encourage land managers to manage portions of pinion-juniper woodlands and aspen/conifer forests in early successional stages. https://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame/pdf/mule_deer_plan.pdf Utah Elk Statewide Management Plan (2010) The project is designated crucial summer range / calving habitat for Elk. It will address Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of forage and cover on 250,000 acres of elk habitat with emphasis on calving habitat and upper elevation elk winter range by the end of this plan. Under this objective, strategies D and F apply. Strategy D. Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve elk habitat with emphasis on calving habitat and winter ranges. Strategy F. Encourage land managers to manage portions of forests in early succession stages through the use of controlled burning and logging. Controlled burning should only be used in areas where there are minimal invasive weed and/or safety concerns. This project area is of minimal weed concern. https://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame/pdf/elk_plan.pdf
Fire / Fuels:
The Upper Provo project is located approximately 3 miles east of the community of Samak, which has been identified by the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands as a Community at Risk. The project is located along the north side of Highway 150, a heavily used recreation corridor and designated scenic byway. Numerous campgrounds and recreation access points dot the highway. The current fuel conditions pose a risk to public safety due to ingress/egress issues, as identified in a 2005 Fireshed Assessment, and the 2013 Northern Utah Regional Wildfire Protection Plan identifies this area as a moderate - high risk area for wildfire. Introducing fire to the area will make a more resilient ecosystem, allowing moderate fire to improve the condition of the current fire regime. The box fire in 2016 is an example of what we are trying to mimic on our terms. Allowing for varying degrees of fire behavior to impact the area.
Water Quality/Quantity:
There are no streams that will be impacted by this roadside thinning.
Compliance:
Archaeology clearances completed, June 25 2014 / 6 NEPA, NEPA completed, May 29 2014
Methods:
chainsaws
Monitoring:
12 established vegetation plots will be revisited and walk through surveys will be completed at least once post-treatment. Data collection will include ocular estimates of shrub and ground cover, and juniper density measurements. A monitoring report will be completed and uploaded to the project database. As well as landscape pre post photos will be uploaded to database.
Partners:
DWR, DNR, State of Utah, town of Samak, permittee, FFSL
Future Management:
Grazing management will occur through a rest-rotation grazing system.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Available forage is expected to increase post-treatment with the enhancement of aspen regen and fresh foliage post burn.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$10,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $61,450.00 $91,450.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
NEPA Pre/Post monitoring, travel to and from, NEPA $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 2014
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Burn Prep: Line construction, Snagging, Scouting, and Logistics. USFS FF&SL fire personel base pay. $0.00 $20,000.00 $26,000.00 2018
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Burn Prep: Line construction, Snagging and Piling. USFS, FF&SL, or other cooperator crews. Overtime cost $10,000.00 $0.00 $5,450.00 2018
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$10,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $61,450.00 $91,450.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands (FFSL) $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2018
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (UWRI) Asking 10,000 from WRI for overtime cost to help accomplish prep work needed for next fiscal yr/phase of RX implementation. $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
United States Forest Service (USFS) $0.00 $0.00 $61,450.00 2018
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Project Comments
Comment 01/25/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Taylor Payne
I appreciate the preparation for a prescriptive burn and what the benefits are for it in the future. However, There isn't enough information provided here about livestock benefits/management, or any information about the planned livestock grazing other than they'll use a rest-rotational grazing system. I would appreciate knowing What allotment(s) are effected? What coordination has been given to the livestock permittee(s)? What kind of plans are in place for continual grazing use after a prescribed burn? Also, it would be good to include the allotment management plan with all of the other management plans and include the grazing permittee(s) as a partner.
Comment 01/26/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Riley Bergseng
Thanks for the comment, as of now we are just in the preparation phase of this project. Currently we are working on the burn plan and working with our range program on the rest rotation and management plans for grazing. We plan on burning this area in FY19 spring or fall. Once I put in for the actual RX funding through WRI, I will address all the concerns you have questioned. The primary goal of this burn is to improve the overall watershed health, improve forage for big game, and reduce the risk to uncharacteristically high intensity wildfire. Because of this there will be enhancement to range grazing in the long term with potentially short term grazing impacts.
Comment 02/06/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Adam Brewerton
Comment from presentation - include full project with burn and shapefiles to rank higher?
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
5882 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop-pile-burn
5883 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop-pile-burn
Project Map
Project Map