Southern Region Riparian Tree and Shrub Planting - FY18
Project ID: 4020
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2018
Submitted By: 521
Project Manager: Nic Braithwaite
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Purchase bare root riparian trees and shrubs and contract with the Utah Conservation Corps to plant riparian vegetation along streams where stream restoration work has recently occurred in the Southern Region.
Location:
Various locations in Beaver, Garfield, Piute, and Wayne Counties where stream restoration/improvement work has already been implemented (e.g., installation of in-stream structures to reduce stress and erosion on stream banks, riparian fencing and grazing management plan to minimize exploitation of riparian vegetation from livestock use) and riparian vegetation is currently lacking.
Project Need
Need For Project:
One key factor for stream enhancement projects to be successful is the establishment of woody riparian vegetation. Woody riparian vegetation helps to stabilize stream banks, create valuable instream and nearstream habitat, directly and indirectly increase food production for fish and wildlife, and other numerous benefits.
Objectives:
The main goal of the project is to improve the condition and function of riparian corridors in the Southern Region. The main objective is to establish a healthy, diverse woody riparian vegetation community where none currently exist along important stream corridors in the Southern Region.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If the project is not funded, it will take longer for woody riparian vegetation to establish or some areas may never have the diversity of trees and shrubs necessary to significantly benefit wildlife and users. The absence of important woody riparian vegetation negatively impacts wildlife (e.g., poor habitat for sensitive species and game fish), reduces recreational opportunities (e.g., poor habitat related to riparian vegetation can be a limiting factor for popular game fish), leads to poor water quality (e.g., no buffer for nonpoint source of pollutants from overland flow), puts past stream enhancement efforts at risk (e.g., elevated rates of erosion could cause the loss of structures or other past enhancement work), etc. Furthermore, the project sites have had substantial investments in restoration work done and not funding can either set back or put at risk habitat goals and objectives. If the project is funded, there are no notable threats or risks. Similar projects have been funded and implemented in the past without any major problems and positive results.
Relation To Management Plan:
The project would help to address "Threats" listed in the Utah Wildlife Action Plan: 1. "Improper Grazing (current)" - the project would utilize riparian fencing and an agreement with landowners for a rest period followed by short duration, high intensity grazing during spring time only (i.e., Potential Conservation Action Code 2.1.2). 2."Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional)" - the project would use riparian planting to promote a more diverse riparian plant community (i.e., Potential Conservation Action Code 2.3.6). 3. "Sediment Transport Imbalance" - the project would use planting to reduce the rate of streambank erosion, which can cause imbalance in sediment transport and elevated levels of nutrients (e.g., total phosphorous) (Potential Conservation Action Code Not Listed). 4. "Increasing Stream Temperatures" - the project would use planting to establish a more robust and diverse community of riparian vegetation (i.e., Potential Conservation Action Codes 2.3.5, 2.3.6, 2.3.15). The project would help to meet goals and objectives listed in the Upper Sevier Watershed Management Plan: 1. "Maintain or improve water quality and quantity for local needs while providing for the needs of recreation, fish and wildlife" - establish woody riparian vegetation where needed, decrease sediment flow into the river, etc. 2. "Provide suitable habitat for a diversity of wildlife species" - provide and protect quality fish habitat and recreational angling opportunities. 3. "Maintain and restore desired vegetation that is resilient and sustainable" - move vegetation communities closer to desired conditions. 4. "Maintain ranching and agricultural as sustainable economic, cultural and lifestyle components of the Upper Sevier Watershed" - riparian plantings along the Sevier River are done on private land in a manner that helps to "address potential and real conflicts between wildlife management goals and private land use". The project would help to achieve water quality and beneficial use goals cited in the Otter Creek - East Fork Sevier TMDL Study: 1. "Stabilize channel banks" - reduce streambank erosion and promote stability. 2. "Increase filtering capacity" - buffer nonpoint sources of phosphorous (pollutant of concern) from overland flow. 3. "Protect waters for cold water species of game fish and other cold water aquatic life, including the necessary aquatic organisms in their food chain" - shift and maintain temperature and dissolved oxygen at suitable levels for cold water aquatic species. The project would implement conservation elements called for in the Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Southern Leatherside (Lepidomeda aliciae) in the State of Utah: 1. "Habitat Enhancement" - restore habitat conditions within the historical range of southern leatherside. 2. "Restore Hydrologic Conditions" - restore natural hydrologic characteristics and water quality (e.g., riparian buffer of nonpoint source pollutants). 3. "Range Expansion" - create suitable habitat conditions for potential reintroduction of southern leatherside to the lower Beaver River. The project would help to meet habitat-related objectives in the Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-grouse in Utah: 1. Riparian plantings would promote a healthy, functioning riparian habitat along the upper Sevier River and benefit late brood-rearing habitat for greater sage-grouse.
Fire / Fuels:
This project encourages a healthy riparian zone, which can provide a vegetation community and microclimate that may reduce the risk of fire to a limited degree and increase the potential use of these areas as control points and fuel/fire breaks.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The project has the potential to improve water quality. The project would occur in areas where a healthy community of riparian vegetation is currently lacking; such areas that are more likely to contribute pollutants to streams via both direct inputs (e.g., total phosporous in soil from eroding stream banks) and indirect pathways (e.g., pollutants entering streams from overland flow are not buffered, stream temperature fluctuations are greater because the microclimate associated with dense, healthy riparian vegetation does not exist). The project would help to establish and increase woody riparian vegetation abundance and diversity along important stream corridors in the Southern Region, which would then help with decreasing pollutants and improve water quality. There are limited pathways by which as project like this can impact water quantity. However, the project does promote reconnecting the stream with the floodplain and increasing water infiltration, both leading to ground water recharge and more consistent flows later into the season.
Compliance:
Archaeology clearance and NEPA would not be required. All planting would be done by hand and only involve small plants (e.g., willow stakes and bare root stock), the areas being planted are already highly disturbed from flooding and land use, and the majority of the project would occur on private land.
Methods:
Bare root trees and shrubs would be purchased from various nurseries depending on stock availability and price. The Utah Conservation Corps would be contracted to plant bare root stock and willow cuttings along stream corridors where past stream enhancement projects have been completed and woody riparian vegetation is still lacking. Planting projects would begin in April of 2018.
Monitoring:
Surveys of vegetation and fish population in the project areas are already being done and would be continued. Specifically, the UDWR monitors vegetation through periodic visual assessments of plantings and vegetation, game fish populations (i.e., brown trout, rainbow trout, and cutthroat trout) through electrofishing surveys, and native fish populations (e.g., southern leatherside) through seining surveys. Additionally, UDWQ has initiated multiple indicator monitoring (MIM) of stream channels and streamside vegetation at sites within the project areas. Fisheries biologists with the UDWR plan to work with UDWQ to aid and expand their monitoring efforts within the project areas.
Partners:
Multiple private landowners, agencies, and other stakeholders have been contacted, involved, and/or expressed support for the project. These partners were first contacted to gain input and support for the initial stream enhancement work (installation of in-stream structures, bank sloping, riparian fencing, etc.) and continue to be engaged in efforts to maintain and further improve upon the initial stream enhancement project. Specific examples of partners include multiple private landowners, local water users, USFWS, BLM, UDWQ, and USU.
Future Management:
All of the areas are fenced and fences area actively maintained. Grazing is excluded along the riparian corridor in most of the areas. There are also grazing plans in place with the landowner or permittee in all areas to manage for establishment of woody riparian vegetation. Planting locations will be monitored and it will be determined if additional plantings are needed. Landowner working with USFWS Partners Program have entered into a 10 year contract in which habitat project will be maintained and monitored for the duration of the contract.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Livestock grazing occurs in the form of managed springtime grazing at most of the project locations. While the woody riparian vegetation that would be planted is intended to be beneficial for fish and wildlife and not necessarily high value for livestock (e.g., willow, cottonwood, water birch, red-osier dogwood, chokecherry, golden currant), it would help to provide some forage for livestock. Landowners working with USFWS are in different stages of resting the riparian treatments for 5 years after which a riparian specific grazing plan will be developed. Most of these projects have divided the riparian areas into several separate pastures so that grazing management can be maximized.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$12,300.00 $5,000.00 $17,300.00 $5,250.00 $22,550.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Hire a four-person Utah Conservation Corps crew for three weeks of planting. $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Materials and Supplies Purchase bare root stock trees and shrubs. $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Motor Pool Regional vehicle mileage. $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Personal Services (permanent employee) UDWR employee supervision of the project. $0.00 $0.00 $750.00 2018
Personal Services (permanent employee) USFWS Funds for practices to be implemented on projects as part of wildlife agreements with the Partners Program that include BDA's and livestock crossings. Also in-kind for time, planning, supervision, labor, etc... $0.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 2018
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$12,300.00 $5,000.00 $17,300.00 $5,250.00 $22,550.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
DNR Watershed N3622 $6,150.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Habitat Council Account HCRF $6,150.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $750.00 2018
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) See budget table $0.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 2018
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Brown Trout R2
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Brown Trout R2
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (Direct, Intentional) Low
Brown Trout R2
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures High
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Low
Waterfowl
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Project Comments
Comment 02/03/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Slate Stewart
Would there not be additional bird species that use riparian corridors that would benefit from woody vegetation?
Comment 02/14/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Nic Braithwaite
Hi Slate, I talked with Keith Day in our office and his sense was that this project would generally help promote a healthy riparian corridor and that would be beneficial on some level for most birds. However, linking that broad benefit to specific species and being able to claim they would be significantly better off just might be pushing it a little. I hope that makes sense. Thanks. Nic
Comment 02/06/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Nic - Great project, I like to see us going back and maintaining and improving past investments. Question: We have been doing this project for quite a few years. Looking back how do you feel about the Return on Investment for these projects?
Comment 02/10/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Nic Braithwaite
Hi Gary, I feel like these projects are effective. We've seen great results on Otter Creek, the East Fork of the Sevier River, and the lower Beaver River. The response on the upper Sevier River has been slower, but is still important. The projects have been done almost yearly because so much stream restoration work has been completed over the past decade and there seems to always be areas that could use some additional planting (e.g., new sections of Otter Creek that have just had riparian fences installed or improved; small sections of banks within old project areas that may have been missed or not survived a high runoff immediately following the initial work). Thanks for the comment. Nic
Comment 02/15/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Nic, Going back through projects this morning and saw that my comment to you on this project never posted for some reason. In any case, I will try to give you the benefit of the doubt since I know most of the answers to these questions. Maybe you can use some of the comments for next year's proposal. "Awesome work you are doing out there. The mapping function leaves a little something to be desired when locating these small stringers. I found the large area along Otter Creek, but haven't been able to locate anything else. Could you provide a better descriptions of the places that you know planting is going to occur this FY? I would think the projects along Otter Creek would provide browse for mule deer and elk...and dare I say brood rearing habitat for the holy grail of birds? For those rankers unfamiliar with the TMDLS for the areas you working in it may be good to spotlight what the stream is listed for and how reduced sedimentation from bank stabilization and/or reduced temperatures via more canopy cover may address those TMDLs in the water quality section. As I mentioned in the Beaver River project, I would not downplay the benefits of riparian vegetation and a connected water table to changing water availability (quantity). Numerous studies have shown the ability of riparian vegetation to moderate flood flows and increase percolation into groundwater. Similarly studies show fairly dramatic soil moisture losses when a stream incises, so if you are reconnecting the floodplain to its water table I would imagine that you are having at least the same benefit to that area as a PJ removal project has to the soil moisture of a sagebrush steppe area. How much of the area is in Partners 10 year landowner agreement? Just to clarify, it appears that many of these areas will eventually be turned into riparian pastures and will help with managing timing, duration and intensity of grazing use? Also many of these areas are stabilizing previous projects that likely improved water table connectivity for forage?"
Comment 02/15/2017 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
I will speak for some of your questions as some of the project areas I have been the project manager over and teamed up with Nic on this proposal this year. I agree it is really hard to find all these small sections of rivers on the map. Three landowners are on Otter Creek and one on the Fremont near Torrey. I have 3, and likely 4 by the time funding is awarded, landowners that will have signed a habitat agreement with USFWS Partners Program. Two of them also have NRCS contracts. The USFWS agreements are for 10 years and in that 10 years they agree to keep in place and maintain habitat restored while working with me to monitor and access if any additional adaptive management or restoration work is needed. All 4 of my project areas have riparian fencing installed and are being rested (5 years) then at some future point a riparian specific grazing strategy will be implemented. Most of them are also working on upland treatments like seeding, weeds, ect... I added sage grouse and mule deer to the species list because the Otter Creek areas are critical wet areas for grouse and also get heavy mule deer use, especially does and fawns from my observations.
Comment 08/21/2018 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Since these areas are so narrow and spread across the region it is hard to see the features even when it is highlighted. It would be helpful for you to include a quick approximate location in the completion report so the reader knows where to zoom in to be able to see the treatment areas. Thanks.
Comment 08/22/2018 Type: 2 Commenter: Nic Braithwaite
Hi Alison - I added descriptions for the areas that were planted in the Completion Form to make it easier to find on the map. Let me know if there is anything else I need to add or change. Thanks. Nic
Completion
Start Date:
03/01/2018
End Date:
04/30/2018
FY Implemented:
2018
Final Methods:
Bare root trees and shrubs were be purchased from various nurseries. A four-person conservation corps crew was hired for three weeks to plant the bare root stock and willow cuttings on stream enhancement projects that have been completed in the past and other appropriate areas that have proper livestock grazing management in place. Areas that were planted include the lower Beaver River between the town of Minersville and Minersville Reservoir, the upper Sevier River near the town of Hatch, East Fork of the Sevier River in Kingston Canyon, and Otter Creek upstream of the reservoir. Planting projects were completed in March and April 2018.
Project Narrative:
The project was implemented as planned. There were no significant problems, difficulties, etc. The partnership with landowners was beneficial to the project and utilizing a conservation corps crew to do the plantings seemed to be effective.
Future Management:
All of the areas are fenced and fences area actively maintained. Grazing is excluded along the riparian corridor in most of the areas. There are also grazing plans in place with the landowner or permittee in all areas to manage for establishment of woody riparian vegetation. Planting locations will be monitored and it will be determined if additional plantings are needed.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
5709 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
5710 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
5722 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
Project Map
Project Map