Sheeprocks Beaver Dam Analogues Phase 2
Project ID: 4428
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 538
Project Manager: Robert Edgel
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Central Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Central
Description:
We will continue to build beaver dam analogues (BDAs) on the Vernon and Little Valley creeks where we have built BDAs on the first phase of this project on USFS land and we will also begin to work on private property along these creeks. In addition, we will get the permitting and NEPA done for future BDA work on Bennion Creek and Harker Canyon Creek.
Location:
Located on the northeast side of the Sheeprock Mountains near Vernon, UT. Along the Little Valley, Vernon, Harker Canyon, and Bennion Creeks.
Project Need
Need For Project:
We will be installing additional beaver dam analogue structures (See Attached Documents for More Info on BDAs) in the Vernon and Little Valley Creeks to improve the habitat for wildlife. We will use these funds to get the stream alteration permit done for future work on Bennion and Harker Creeks as well. If permits and NEPA is completed we will also begin installing BDAs on Bennion and Harker Creeks.The sage-grouse population in the Sheeprocks SGMA is struggling to survive and particularly needs this project to help benefit chick production and survival. Population numbers have dropped so low that if action is not taken the population could be extirpated. This year the UDWR translocated more birds to the area to augment the population, but the root causes of the population decline need to be addressed in order to ensure the future of this population. One of the likely causes for their decline is habitat loss and degradation. One of the most important habitat types for sage-grouse is wet meadow habitat (Forbs, Green Grasses, and Wetland Vegetation). This habitat type provides high nutrient vegetation and insects which are crucial, especially for young chick development. Because sage-grouse have high mortality rates and are not long-lived birds, it is important to recruit as many new individuals to the population every year to maintain population numbers. Vernon Creek, Little Valley Creek, Bennion Creek, and Harker Canyon Creek are located within prime brood-rearing habitat. All of these creeks have been degraded and channelized in spots from human causes, livestock damage, and erosion. This channel incision results in steep and deep banks that are dangerous for livestock and wildlife and make it difficult for animals to drink. It also causes more water to be lost from the system and less vegetation to grow along the banks that could be used by livestock and wildlife. The creeks in this area historically likely had beavers that would dam the stream and slow the water so it would not erode as heavily and cut as deep into the ground. These beaver dams would also create meanders, and flooding the stream banks which would water more plants. This flooding would increase soil moisture across a larger area and produce more wet meadow vegetation along the banks. This natural meanders also helped to reduce channel incision and erosion which results in a loss of habitat. The loss of this habitat has likely attributed to the decline in sage-grouse. Beaver re-introduction in some areas is not always plausible politically or biologically. This area is one such area that may not be a good candidate for re-introduction. Instead we plan to build man made beaver dams called beaver dam analogues or BDAs to replace the lost ecological function that would exist if beavers were in the system and to repair damage that has been caused by other means. This action will greatly enhance the habitat for sage-grouse and many other wildlife species and livestock.
Objectives:
1. Increase the amount and quality of green high protein content vegetation in sage-grouse brood rearing habitat. 2. Restore the vegetation around the Vernon Creek to provide greater insect quantities for sage-grouse to consume during critical developmental stages. 3. Improve the riparian and aquatic habitat surrounding spring habitats associated with the riparian corridor 4. Improve the water quantity and quality. 5. Restore the ecosystem surrounding the creek. 6. Create a larger fire break to protect important habitat by increasing the width of the green vegetation around the creek. 7. Reduce invasive weeds from establishing in disturbed areas.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If we do not conduct this project we: 1. Risk of losing the Sheeprocks Sage-grouse population. 2. Will continue to see degradation of creeks and this may increase costs of future restoration. 3. Will continue to see loss of value to aquatic species of the main spring in the corridor 4. Risk reducing water quality and quantity. 5. May see increase fire risk from not increasing the green vegetation along the stream bank as a fire break.
Relation To Management Plan:
Wildlife Action Plan 1. Under the threats, data gaps, and action section of the plan it identifies a list of Essential Conservation Actions. It states the need to restore and improve degraded wildlife habitats. species and others. 2. The habitat type that this project is located in as identified in the WAP is the aquatic scrub/shrub type. We will be improving the habitat in this key habitat and addressing the threats to this habitat type. 3. The plan identifies sediment transport imbalance as a medium threat to this habitat type and this project will help to reduce sediment transport by stabilizing the banks with vegetation and rocks. 4.It identifies channel down-cutting as a high threat and this project will help to remove the channels in the stream and make a more subtle gradient. This project will raise the water levels to restore the floodplain and reduce this channel down-cutting. 5. The plan mentions a management strategy that this project addresses to help improve this habitat type through 1.( restoring more natural water and sediment flow regimes) Utah State Sage-grouse Management Plan 1. Protect 10,000 acres of the best Sage-Grouse habitat 2. Enhance 25,000 acres of existing Sage-Grouse habitat 3. Increase the total amount of Sage-Grouse habitat by 50,000 acres Beaver Management Plan Watershed Restoration 1. Support restoration of beaver and adequate protection where establishing 2. Consider using beaver as a stream restoration tool 3. Beaver are a good tool that could be used to restore degraded riparian communities that could benefit many other wildlife species 4.Need to consider the site characteristics of the locations where beaver will be relocated/re-introduced enough vegetation to support a beaver population 5. Potential benefits of aspen/cottonwood restoration in improving beaver habitat Outreach and Education Objective 1: Increase awareness of and appreciation for the role of beaver in Utah's ecosystems in 10% of stakeholders (landowners, educators, recreationalists, sportsmen, water rights holders) by 2020. We will be working with private landowners and citizen scientists to educate them about importance of beavers in ecosystem. 4. Establish at least one showcase beaver management area in each UDWR Region. Objective 2: Improve the understanding of all UDWR and other governmental agency employees involved in beaver management and assure consistent transmission of information and application of management actions through 2020. Watershed Restoration Objective 1: Work to improve riparian habitats, associated streams and wetlands in a minimum of 10 tributaries through translocating beaver into unoccupied suitable habitat on public and/or private land by 2020. This project will not be translocating beavers at this time to this area, but through the use of BDAs we will be re-introducing the functionality of beavers in the system. Also we will be improving the habitat and preparing an area so that in the future beavers can be re-introduced. Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan Habitat Objective1: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. Statewide Elk Managment Plan 1. Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. 2. Maintain sufficient habitat to support elk herds at population objectives and reduce competition for forage between elk and livestock. Statewide Turkey Managment Pan Objective Increase wild turkey habitat, quality and quantity, by 40,000 acres statewide by 2020.
Fire / Fuels:
This project will increase the sinuosity of the stream, raise the water table, slow water movement through the system and reconnect the channel with its historic floodplain. This will increase the amount of riparian vegetation which will create a larger fuel break to stop fires from spreading and destroying more critical wildlife habitat. It will also create a location where firefighters can more easily combat the fire.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Currently in areas where the stream-bank has been stripped of vegetation due to erosion, resulting in more downcutting, this leads to further erosion and diminished water quality. This project will help to raise the water levels and allow for more vegetation to be growing near the water to stabilize the banks. This will help increase the water quality and quantity in the system. This project will also slow the flow of water which will decrease the amount of erosion that will occur in big flood events. Slowing the water will also increase the quantity of water that is able to seep into the soil and benefit the system. This will also hold water longer upstream and increase the length of time that the reservoir downstream can hold water, thus increasing its capacity and water quantity.
Compliance:
NEPA and Stream Alteration permits have already been completed for Vernon and Little Valley Creeks. This project will pay for the stream alteration permitting to be done for Bennion and Harker Canyon creeks. This will help get the NEPA done for these creeks. When NEPA is completed for Harker and Bennion we will begin to do work on them. The UDWR or Forest Service will conduct any necessary archaeological clearances in-house for this project.
Methods:
We will construct the BDAs with sharpened lodgepole fence posts, approximately 3-4" diameter. They will be driven into the stream bed with a gas post pounder or hydraulic post pounder. The posts will extend about 1 m above the channel bed. The posts will be spaced approximately 0.5 - 0.8 m apart, and driven to a depth of approximately 1 m into the streambed. We will then weave willow branches or other tree branches that are available onsite between the posts to create a structure that will look like a beaver dam. The willows will help to slow the water but will also allow fish to pass through. We will then reinforce the posts with stream bed material at the base of the posts. The idea is that the dams will last until sediment is piled up at the dam and vegetation begins to grow and the stream channel rises and floods. We will place dams about 30 - 100 m apart, depending on where they need to go. After a year we will assess the health of the stream again and determine what progress has been made and where future BDAs need to be placed.
Monitoring:
We have already conducted a Rapid Stream-Riparian Assessment (RSRA) monitoring methodology (See Attached) on Vernon and Little Valley Creek. We will go back after a few years and do this monitoring again to see how the stream health has changed. We will also and see how this work . We are asking for funds this year to monitor whether BDAs improve the area for bats, including Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifigus), a SCGN in the 2015-2025 Wildlife Action Plan. We plan to monitor for bats by following the protocol for the North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat), which uses stationary acoustic devices, driving surveys, and possibly mist-netting to detect bat activity. We plan to set acoustic monitoring equipment at sites were BDAs were installed in 2017 as well as sites where new BDAs are planned for installation, to try to determine if bat activity differs between sites. Data collected from the grid encompassing the Vernon BDA project area will also be included in the nationwide NABat program.
Partners:
The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is partnering with the U.S. Forest Service and private landowners which are the land owners where these BDAs will be placed. We will also work with the NRCS to help partner in that effort. The Wild Utah Project has been a partner in the past to build BDAs and conduct past monitoring.
Future Management:
We will continue to monitor the success of these BDAs in the future and make any repairs or adjustments as needed to ensure their success. We may do future plantings or seeding if necessary as well. The Forest Service will work with the UDWR to continue to build upon these improvements to benefit the habitat in this area. There may be further work to introduce aquatic species. There will also be further translocations of sage-grouse to this area to augment the SheepRock population. The U.S. Forest Service will monitor grazing to see if fencing will need to be built in the future, or whether reductions in livestock grazing will be needed, to ensure the success of the project.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Livestock that utilize this area will benefit by having an increase in vegetation around the stream which will increase the amount of available forage. They will also be able to access the water more easily without causing added damage to the stream bank.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$6,800.00 $0.00 $6,800.00 $6,000.00 $12,800.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Other Funds to pay for Stream Alteration Permitting on Bennion and Harker Canyon Creeks. $500 per permit per creek. $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (permanent employee) In-Kind contribution by UDWR full time employees to build BDAs. 3 employees of 80 hours of work each. $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Funds for 150 wood posts to build BDAs. Typically $6 per post. $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (seasonal employee) One week of seasonal technician time for 2 wildlife section technicians to conduct bat monitoring and to help do pre-BDA Rapid Stream Health Assessment monitoring. (Terri Pope's Sensitive Species Wildlife Technicians) $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Motor Pool One week of truck use for seasonal wildlife technicians doing bat monitoring. (Terri Pope's Sensitive Species Wildlife Technicians Vehicle) $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (seasonal employee) 2 Habitat Section Seasonal Technicians to build and conduct monitoring on BDAs for 80 hours. $2,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Funds for fuel to power gas and hydraulic post pounders. Also, money to pay for additional shovels, clippers, and other materials that may be needed. $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$6,800.00 $0.00 $6,800.00 $9,200.00 $16,000.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation NS6522 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2019
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) NS6523 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) NS6524 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Safari Club International NS6526 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) NS6527 $1,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Volunteers - Dedicated Hunters Dedicated hunters to help build BDAs. $0.00 $0.00 $3,200.00 2019
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Groundwater Pumping Low
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Groundwater Pumping Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (Direct, Intentional) Low
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures Unknown
Mountain Meadow
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Project Comments
Comment 01/23/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Robbie I would add Riverine to your habitats list - you're definitely proposing to improve the habitat quality / condition of the stream itself, by abating some notable threats to it.
Comment 01/24/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Robert Edgel
Jimi, Good catch. I will add riverine.
Comment 01/23/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
This is one of the - perhaps the very - first time(s) I have seen an appropriate use of one of the Data Gaps (here, "Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range"). Your proposed monitoring will attempt to help fill this data gap. Well done, thank you.
Comment 01/24/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Robert Edgel
Thanks!
Comment 02/08/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Justin Robinson
Approved for ranking.
Completion
Start Date:
08/01/2018
End Date:
05/15/2019
FY Implemented:
2019
Final Methods:
We constructed approximately 30 BDAs on Vernon and Little Valley creeks in the fall of 2018. We pounded 3" wood posts into the stream bed about 1' apart. We then weaved willow and juniper branches between the posts. Lastly, we placed coconut fiber mesh and mud along the bottom to keep from washing out and catch more sediment. In the spring of 2019 we also planted 10 wetland sod mats behind several BDAs to see if they would establish and help hold the sediment in place so it wouldn't erode away. It established within a few days and has worked very well to hold sediment behind the dams. It has become necessary to acquire water rights now to build BDAs and I used funds to apply for new stream alteration permits. We are in the process of getting water rights as well.
Project Narrative:
The sage-grouse population in the Sheeprocks SGMA is struggling to survive and particularly needs this project to help benefit chick production and survival. Population numbers have dropped so low that if action is not taken the population could be extirpated. This year the UDWR translocated more birds to the area to augment the population, but the root causes of the population decline need to be addressed in order to ensure the future of this population. One of the likely causes for their decline is habitat loss and degradation. One of the most important habitat types for sage-grouse is wet meadow habitat (Forbs, Green Grasses, and Wetland Vegetation). This habitat type provides high nutrient vegetation and insects which are crucial, especially for young chick development. Because sage-grouse have high mortality rates and are not long-lived birds, it is important to recruit as many new individuals to the population every year to maintain population numbers. Vernon Creek, Little Valley Creek, Bennion Creek, and Harker Canyon Creek are located within prime brood-rearing habitat. All of these creeks have been degraded and channelized in spots from human causes, livestock damage, and erosion. This channel incision results in steep and deep banks that are dangerous for livestock and wildlife and make it difficult for animals to drink. It also causes more water to be lost from the system and less vegetation to grow along the banks that could be used by livestock and wildlife. The creeks in this area historically likely had beavers that would dam the stream and slow the water so it would not erode as heavily and cut as deep into the ground. These beaver dams would also create meanders, and flooding the stream banks which would water more plants. This flooding would increase soil moisture across a larger area and produce more wet meadow vegetation along the banks. This natural meanders also helped to reduce channel incision and erosion which results in a loss of habitat. The loss of this habitat has likely attributed to the decline in sage-grouse. Beaver re-introduction in some areas is not always plausible politically or biologically. This area is one such area that may not be a good candidate for re-introduction. Instead we plan to build man made beaver dams called beaver dam analogues or BDAs to replace the lost ecological function that would exist if beavers were in the system and to repair damage that has been caused by other means. This action will greatly enhance the habitat for sage-grouse and many other wildlife species and livestock. We installed additional beaver dam analogue structures (See Attached Documents for More Info on BDAs) in the Vernon and Little Valley Creeks to improve the habitat for wildlife. See photos for what these BDAs looked like. These BDAs will help improve the habitat for sage-grouse and other wildlife and livestock. We will continue to build BDAs for multiple years until we have completely restored teh health of these systems.
Future Management:
We will continue to monitor the success of these BDAs in the future and make any repairs or adjustments as needed to ensure their success. We may do future plantings or seeding if necessary as well. The Forest Service will work with the UDWR to continue to build upon these improvements to benefit the habitat in this area. There may be further work to introduce aquatic species. There will also be further translocations of sage-grouse to this area to augment the Sheeprock population.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8190 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
8191 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
Project Map
Project Map