South Canyon (Sunset Cliffs)
Project ID: 4488
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 1160
Project Manager: Steven Barker
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Improve 3,920 acres (see map) of sage grouse habitat, prairie dog habitat, winter/summer mule deer range, elk range, pronghorn range, and reduce hazardous fuels while improving existing Ponderosa Pine stands near Panguitch and Hillsdale, Utah by seeding PJ woodland, mechanically mulching phase III PJ woodland acres, lop and scatter on phase I PJ woodland acres, as well as a spike treatment for the removal of Sage and Rabbit brush.
Location:
South Canyon (Hillsdale) project is located 3 miles south of Panguitch, Utah, 4 miles north of Hatch, Utah within the Pass Creek and Panguitch Creek Watershed.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The South Canyon (Sunset Cliffs) project area is dominated by stands of pinyon and juniper trees with a high percentage of young trees encroaching areas of sagebrush steppe causing a downward trend in herbaceous cover and creating a high fire danger for surrounding urban interfaces. Some of the areas within the site have little remnant sagebrush, forb or grass component. The project area serves as important seasonal and year round habitat for several species of wildlife including but not limited to sage grouse, prairie dogs, mule deer, elk, pronghorn antelope, and many shrub steppe birds. In particular, this project is needed and proposed to re-establish and maintain sagebrush steppe habitat, open travel corridors and provide benefits to sage grouse within and immediately adjacent to the project area. This project was ranked as being one of the top two priority projects for sage grouse by CCARM. Currently there is an active 8.3 acre Utah Prairie Dog colony as well as the 1697 acre Hillsdale prairie dog management area with a target population on 20 within the project. In addition, small amounts of ponderosa pine is found within the project area. Understory pinyon/juniper currently form ladder fuels that could potentially spread ground fires into crowns of remaining ponderosa pine. Pinyon/juniper also limit the recruitment of ponderosa seedlings. There is a need to remove encroaching pinyon/juniper to improve ponderosa pine stands. High pinyon/juniper tree density also increases the risk of catastrophic wildfire, thus threatening the communities and outlying residential properties of Panguitch, Hillsdale, and Hatch, Utah. A catastrophic wildlfire could also increase the risk of invasive species and erosion. Past projects in the area have proven successful in restoring grass, forb, and shrub species to the site, decreasing erosion, improving species diversity and functional plant groups and improving winter/summer mule deer, pronghorn, shrub steppe birds and sage grouse habitat.
Objectives:
1) Maintain or improve vegetative diversity and age class structure. 2) Re-establish frequency of grasses to 20%, forbs to 10% and shrubs to 40%. 3) Restore percent canopy of grasses to 30%, forbs to 10% and shrubs to 35%. 4) Reintroduce healthy, viable, perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs on historical sage grouse habitats. 5) Maintain/Improve presence of ponderosa pine on the landscape.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The invasion of pinyon and juniper trees into areas once dominated by grasses, forbs, and shrubs increases the risk of losing key areas for sage grouse, prairie dogs, mule deer, elk, pronghorn and many shrub steppe birds. Without this project, sage grouse would be at an increased risk, and/or could move to imminent listing due to lack of important habitat needed for survival. The increase of pinyon and juniper also increases the risk of catastrophic wildfire in these habitats. The risk of invasion of cheatgrass and rabbitbrush and loss of sagebrush after wildfire could further impact sage grouse in the area. Catastrophic wildfire also threatens other wildlife habitat, in addition to the communities and outlying properties of Panguitch, Hatch, and Hillsdale, Utah. Pinyon and juniper is encroaching on an active prairie dog colony as well as the Hillsdale management unit causing loss in habitat for the Utah prairie dog. Past phases of projects identical to the proposed project have proved successful in meeting objectives. However, as with any surface disturbing activity in sagebrush ecosystems, there is a low potential for weed invasion. BLM will aggressively treat any noxious weeds in the area if found.
Relation To Management Plan:
Upper Sevier Watershed Management Plan (2004). This area was identified as 1 of 3 priority areas overall, within the entire Upper Sevier planning area. This project is in conformance with the Kanab Field Office Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (RMP), signed October 31, 2008. VEG-30, 32, 33, 35. SOL-3. The proposed treatment is consistent with Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Decision #FW-01, with states: 1) that BLM will manage suitable public land habitats for the recovery or re-establishment of native populations through collaborative planning with local, state, and federal agencies, user groups, and interested publics; and 2) that BLM will also seed to limit additional adverse impacts to crucial habitats on public lands from urbanization and encroachment to preserve the integrity of wildlife corridors and migration routes and access to key forage areas. Numerous other management plans have identified the need for these projects, including the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule Deer (2008), Color Country Adaptive Resource Management Plan (CCARM) (2008) for sage grouse, The proposed project is consistent with the Southern Utah Support Area Fire Management Plan dated September 9, 2004, which states: 15,000 acres be mechanically treated to convert pinyon and juniper invasion (condition class 3) into sagebrush/perennial grass (condition class 1 or 2) vegetation types. BLM National Sage Grouse Habitat Conservation Strategy (2004). Utah Wildlife Conservation Strategy (2005). Of particular concern within this area are: Greater Sage Grouse, mule deer, and shrub steppe (key habitat). Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule Deer (2008). The Color Country Adaptive Resource Management Plan for Sage Grouse (CCARM) (2007) strategies and action to: 1) Improve age distribution of plants within sagebrush-steppe communities by 2016; 2) Identify and prioritize target areas needing improvement; 3) Coordinate among agencies and landowners to fund implementation of projects and monitoring; 4) Monitor response of sage grouse to changing habitat conditions. National Greater Sage Grouse Planning Strategy (2011) which provides a framework for establishing adequate regulatory mechanisms (conservation measures). Sagebrush Memorandum of Understanding (2008) and the WAFWA Greater Sage Grouse Comprehensive Conservation Strategy (2006). Other plans that relate to the proposed project are: BLM's Final Programmatic Environmental Report: Vegetation Treatments on BLM Lands in 17 Western States Programmatic Environmental Report, June 2007, The Fundamental of Rangeland Health (43 CFR 4180) and Utah's Standards and Guidelines for Rangeland Health which address watersheds, ecological condition, water quality and habitat for special status species, National Fire Plan (2000), Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 which state protecting forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands from unnaturally intensive and destructive fires, Utah Wildlife Conservation Strategy (2005), and Coordinated Implementation Plan for Bird Conservation in Utah (2005),
Fire / Fuels:
Within the project area there is a large fuel loading build up and an alteration in fuel types. Pinyon and juniper trees, once held to lower densities by more frequent fires, have expanded in range and moved into areas once dominated by shrubs, forbs, and grasses. Without this project, fuel conditions are such that an unexpected wildfire may be difficult to contain, leading to an increased risk to firefighter and public safety, suppression effectiveness and natural resource degradation such as loss of important occupied sage grouse and winter mule deer habitat. Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) within the project area is predominately FRCC 3 which is where fire regimes have been extensively altered and risk of losing key ecosystem components from fire is high. Treatments identified within this proposal would help reduce hazardous fuel loads, create fuel breaks, and reduce the overall threat of a catastrophic wildfire which could impact the communities and infrustructure of Panguitch, Hillsdale, and Hatch, UT, occupied sage grouse habitat, winter mule deer habitat, as well as firefighter and public safety. Treatments in and around the sagebrush areas would break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of wildfire entering these sensitive areas. Removing pinyon and juniper in a mosaic pattern would also break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of a high intensity wildfire. Because there is a greater risk of conversion of important sagebrush semi-desert habitat to annual grasslands and rabbitbrush under a high intensity fire, managed, pro-active treatments proposed would reduce the likelihood of cheatgrass and rabbitbrush invasion and help perennial grasses and forbs persist long-term. The treatment proposed would help to effectively return this area to a more resilient landscape by placing the fire regime closer to the historical range (FRCC1) and fire adapted Ponderosa Pine forest stands, where fire plays a role in the ecosystem.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The South Canyon (Sunset Cliffs) project is located within the Upper Sevier River Watershed. The area is surrounded by rocky hills which make the area vulnerable to high amounts of runoff. Water quality and quantity due to the lack of herbaceous understory throughout the area was recognized by the Upper Sevier Watershed Plan. The project area is dominated by Phase III juniper expansion with Phase I expansion on the outer edges of the project area. Reduced plant community composition, and structural diversity has caused a high proportion of bare ground which is susceptible to accelerated runoff and erosion into the Sevier River. Removal of Phase I and III PJ encroachment and the increase of herbaceous perennial species, water quality and quantity should improve. Studies have shown that an additional 45 day increase of water can occur when pinyon and juniper are removed and a perennial herbaceous understory is established. Runoff will decrease and less sediment will be moved out of the watershed due to an increase of a herbaceous understory. Previous phases of this project have proven successful in reducing erosion as soils have stabilized once seeding is established.
Compliance:
Archeological clearances will be completed prior to the 2019 Fiscal Year. Wildlife clearances will be completed prior to the 2019 Fiscal Year. NEPA for the South Canyon Vegetation Enhancement Project was signed February, 2010.
Methods:
Pinyon and juniper, which currently occupy and are encroaching upon the site will be removed through mechanical mulching of 691 acres. Islands and corridors of pinyon and juniper would remain untreated throughout the unit, creating a mosaic pattern of treated and untreated vegetation (see Attached Photos). Before mechanical implementation, mulching areas would be broadcast seeded with a mix of native and non-native shrubs, grasses and forbs important for improving sage grouse winter and brooding habitat, winter mule deer range, pronghorn habitat and stabilization of soils. Pinyon and juniper, which currently occupy the project site would be lopped and scattered by contract hand crews with chainsaws and loppers, removing all trees on approximately 2832acres. Boundaries may be adjusted this spring which may change the acres of actual treatment. Stringers of thicker trees in the washes will be left for big game where it is determined beneficial by BLM and DWR biologists. Since there is a good existing under-story, seeding will not be needed. 345 acres will be treated with Tibuthiron (spike) for the removal of Sage and Rabbit brush for the use of Utah Prairie Dog and for improvement of their habitat in the Hillsdale management unit.
Monitoring:
Vegetation Monitoring Plans: Currently a rain gauge and Nested Frequency plot are located in the project area. Rain gauge data will be read quarterly each year. Frequency studies will be read yearly for 3 years. Data will be summarized each year and placed in project files. Frequency will then be read once every 3-5 years by the Kanab Field Office. Success will be determined by the site having 25% or greater frequency of seeded species by fall of 2018. Wildlife Monitoring Plans: Currently, sage grouse and mule deer pellet counts occur each year. Sage grouse and mule deer pellet counts will continue on a yearly basis. Wildlife studies such as sage grouse and mule deer counts would continue with coordination with UDWR and local working groups. The Sunset Cliffs area is part of the larger Hillsdale Utah Prairie Dog Management Unit . This specific treatment would aid in developing connectivity between habitat for Utah Prairie dogs thru the Paunsaugunt Recovery area.. Monitoring of Prairie Dog habitat and population counts will continue after the completion of the project and will ensure the implementation the Prairie Dog Recovery plan in the area.
Partners:
There has been various partners throughout the previous phases of this project. They include: Bureau of Land Management, Division of Wildlife Resources, Forestry Fire and State Lands, Mule Deer Foundation, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, Safari Club, SITLA, and local livestock grazing permittees. Many partners have provided funds as well as ideas to the success of the project. Coordination has taken place with the Kanab Field Office wildlife biologist, the Color Country District sage grouse biologist and the Division of Wildlife biologist for the area. Input from these biologists was critical in the planning of this project. The Upper Sevier Watershed Plan which identifies concerns and priorities within the project area was accomplished by many partners (Federal, State, and Private). Tours and visits with various groups have occurred multiple times on this project. We have looked at treated as well as non-treated areas. Discussions of methods, ideas, studies, seeded species, and overall what worked and didn't work took place on each of these visits and has been implemented into the project proposal.
Future Management:
This project area is within two grazing allotments. All areas seeded will be rested for a minimum of two complete growing seasons or until the seedlings become established and set seed. Once seeding establishment has been confirmed, BLM may authorize grazing according the the Utah's Fundamentals of Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Grazing Management (2007). Vegetation will continue to be monitored for utilization, cover and trend. Following the rest period, the current management plan will govern. The current plan allows grazing every other year. If needed, grazing adjustments would be made in Grazing Allotment Plans and through the grazing permit renewal process. Future maintenance projects to protect investments made by UWRI/BLM have been addressed and allowed through the project planning document (NEPA). Adaptive management has been allowed for in the NEPA documents. Many tools have been analyzed in the NEPA planning process to allow other methods in the future.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The South Canyon (Sunset Cliffs) project area is within the Sunset Cliffs and Hillsdale grazing allotments. Livestock use on these allotments occurs between June 1 - December 24. The acres of the allotments within the project area are in mid to late seral stages with a static to downward trend due to even-aged, decadent sagebrush and encroachment and infilling by pinyon and juniper. Pinyon and juniper is out competing the shrub and herbaceous components thus reducing available forage for livestock and wildlife. Rangeland conditions are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The health, vigor, recruitment and production of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs would improve which would provide a more palatable and nutritional source of forage for both livestock and wildlife. This will aid in improved rangeland conditions throughout the allotment. Implementation of this project would eventually improve overall livestock performance (e.g. increased cow weights, increased calf crops, increased weaning weights, etc) and improve the economic stability of the permittees due to an increase in the quantity and quality of grasses and other herbaceous forage which are important to livestock grazing. Production of past treatments on the South Canyon project have increased from 30 lbs/acre to over 3,000 lbs/acre once seeding was established.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$252,175.00 $282,550.00 $534,725.00 $20,000.00 $554,725.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Aerial seeding contract (793 acres @ $15/ac) $11,895.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Archaeological Clearance Class III Arc clearance contract (793 acres @ $30/ac) $23,790.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Other Cadastral Survey $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2019
Seed (GBRC) Seed mix for Sunset Cliffs (793 acres @ $70.99/ac) $58,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (permanent employee) Project layout, contract preparation, and contract administration for 793 acres of Arch clearances and Bullhog, 2,832 acres of lop and scatter, 345 acres of spike and 3,625 acres of seeding. $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2019
Contractual Services Aerial contract for spike application (345 acres at $15/ac) $5,175.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Spike (345 acres @ $75/ac) $25,875.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services Hand thin contract (2832 acres @ $45/acre) $127,440.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services Mechanical mulching contract (793 acres @ $350/ac). $0.00 $277,550.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$525,000.00 $282,500.00 $807,500.00 $20,000.00 $827,500.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM Fuels (Color Country) $0.00 $282,500.00 $20,000.00 2019
DNR Watershed N3622 $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) NS6523 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) NS6524 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) NS6527 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Utah Archery Association NS6552 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
DNR Watershed N3622 $28,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2018
BLM (Sage Grouse) N6732 $270k - Mod 11 $144k - Mod 12 $414,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Pronghorn R3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Habitats
Habitat
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/18/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Vicki Tyler
Nice Proposal Steve! Thank you for the pix and the inclusion of actual forage increase, based on clipping studies! A couple of quick questions/comments. You mention this project to benefit UPD, but there is no reference to UPD in the rest of your write-up? What is the status of UPD in this area? If they are not there, are there plans to put them there in the near future. I looked at your seed mix - what is the precip zone? One of the primary benefits of this project is sage grouse. May want to look at the plant material/precip list on the seed mix datasheet and include some additional forbs for sage grouse (lupine, yarrow, globemallow, milkvetch, etc.). Also, a portion of this project falls on SITLA? Can you discuss coordination with them. Lastly, this project tied as the #1 priority project with the local sage grouse working group. I have sent you the minutes - may want to mention that in your write-up. Thanks!
Comment 01/23/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Vicki: Thank you for the comment and the suggestions. There is an active UPD colony as well as the Hillsdale management unit within the area that I will address in the proposal. Thank you for the info on the Sage Grouse, I will look into the seed mix and update the info to show how the project ranked within the local sage grouse working group. Again, thanks for the comments as they will help me improve this proposal.
Comment 01/29/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Steve! Hope life at "the other land management agency" is still treating you well. A lot of great work has been down out in this area and you have put together another nice proposal this year. A few comments/questions: 1) You may want to review your species and habitat threats as I think you are missing a couple that could get you another couple points. 2) Does the project address elements of any County Plans, TMDLs and/or the UPD Recovery Plan? 3) Your proposal discusses that most of the removal planned is for Phase III PJ succession; however it appears that most of the lop as scatter areas are probably Phase I? Could you break the components out into their ecological status and potential benefits, as well as address the risk of the project crossing a threshold where treatment may be more expensive and more difficult? 4) Maybe I missed it in the methods but what is the herbicide treatment? Rabbitbrush I am guessing? 5) Water quality or UPD monitoring? 6) Does past monitoring show sage grouse use of previously treated areas in close proximity to the project? 7) Would the presence of sage grouse or UPD affect how lands will be managed in the future?
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Mike: Thanks for the comment and the suggestions for this proposal. I will take a look at your suggestions and do my best to answer all of them within the proposal. I appreciate your help and it will help to make this project the best it can be. To answer a couple of the comments directly, it is proposed to treat 691 acres of phase III PJ woodland area using mastication, and 2832 acres of Phase I PJ woodland area using a lop and scatter method. Within the 2832 acres of lop and scatter it is proposed to treat 345 acres of sage, and rabbit brush with a spike treatment to improve an active 8 acre UPD colony as well as the remaining 337 acres residing within the Hillsdale UPD management unit. As far as habitat for sage grouse, there is potential to benefit both UPD and Sage Grouse (as well as mule deer, antelope and elk) by generating some diversity in sagebrush areas, and restoring some forbs and grasses in UPD areas. The presence of Sage Grouse and UPD should have no affect on any future management other than current and projected monitoring going on in the area.
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Nice concise write-up. I don't have much to add other than what has already been commented. I did have one thing though that crossed my mind and this might be splitting hairs...............In the seeding it looks all the grasses are cool season, and if i'm right (which it is harder for me to remember forbs) the forbs are too, although a couple of them stay green later into the summer. Point being maybe think about including some warm season seed. I try to tell people to think about plant diversity in terms of both species diversity and seasonal diversity as well. Maybe some grama or sand dropseed for grasses. For forbs I think prairie coneflower might be one to try or ask Danny at GBRC about blanket flower. This is one that I have purchased commercially and done well with and discussed with Danny about potentially getting. Maybe your warm season stuff is there and i'm just blowing smoke. Just some thoughts that crossed my mind.
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Clint: Thank you for the comments and suggestions. The proposed seed mix for this area was derived through the input of a few individuals including the area's Range Specialist, the local Sage Grouse Biologist, and our local Fuels Program Manager. The seed mix is mostly consisting of forbs and grasses that have proven successful in the past on similar and close proximity projects. Typically, past projects in the Panguitch Valley have shown an increase in warm season forbs, and grasses without the need to supplement the project with additional warm season seed. The Panguitch Valley tends to stay at colder temperatures throughout the year and thus we do, and expect to see the presence of some Blue Grama within the project.
Comment 02/02/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: John Reese
Clint, thanks for your comments it's always helpful as others review these proposals and provide feedback. Steve pretty well already answered your questions but I thought I'd provide my two cents. The Hillsdale allotment where this project is taking place is in excellent condition for the most part. Current species are mostly warm season including blue grama and sand dropseed, there is also a lot of mutton grass in the allotment. The trees and brush are as always, increasing and crowding out the more desirable species. We felt like while we were doing the treatment we would try and get some more cool season grasses and forbs into the mix. You are correct I think it is very important to have as mush species diversity and seasonal diversity as possible, because our moister is this part of the country is so unpredictable.
Comment 02/02/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Lisa Church
Clint, Steve and Mike, and John , thank you for your comments and questions regarding the sage grouse and UPD in the area. I would agree with John regarding the warm season component of grasses in the project area , previous projects done for UPD in the area always have a warm season component on site , post treatment they are the first to come in, cool season and forbs have been our need in all of the potential and or future translocation/management units. The Sunset Cliffs area is part of the larger Hillsdale Utah Prairie Dog Management Unit . This specific treatment would aid in developing connectivity between habitat for Utah Prairie dogs thru the Pansuguant Recovery area, and indeed is implementing the Recovery plan.
Comment 02/05/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Steve, There is no active UPD colony in the shapefile you provide, however, there are active colonies adjacent to the Hillsdale management unit identified by the RIT and your project boundaries. This project may benefit the species. Also, I have looked for pygmy rabbits in this area in the past, but not extensively. Any chance pre-treatment surveys could be conducted? Keith
Comment 02/09/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: John Reese
Keith, thanks for your comments. In visiting with Lisa we plan to conduct pre-treatment surveys for pygmy rabbits. We have done these surveys in the past on the Roller Mill allotment and although it seems likely habitat for the them we didn't find any.
Comment 02/15/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Keith: Thank you for the comment. We plan to conduct all required pre-treatment survey's prior to implementation of the project.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
For habitat threats, you're definitely missing "Problematic Plant Species -- Native Upland" for mtn sagebrush, which is ranked VH. Easy couple points pick-up, plus being more correct for future program analysis, reporting, queries etc. Mike may have been alluding to more - that was an obvious one that jumped out at me. Thanks for the proposal, and good luck.
Comment 02/15/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Jimi: Thank you for the comment. The proposal has been updated to show "Native Upland, Problematic Plant Species" for Mtn Sagebrush as well as Mule Deer. I appreciate you taking the time to look over the proposal and giving some suggestions.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Randy Marshall
Steve and Crew, thanks for putting a great write up on domestic grazing use and listing the grazing allotments in your proposal.
Comment 02/15/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Thank you Randy, I appreciate the comments.
Comment 08/26/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Your map features don't match up with what you reported in your completion report. Please upload final/actual acres treated for each treatment. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
10/22/2018
End Date:
12/22/2018
FY Implemented:
2019
Final Methods:
Hammond Helicopter aerially seeded 895 acres of grasses, forbs and shrubs with a fixed wing aircraft. Hammond Helicopter completed a 358 acre spike treatment. October 22, 2018: Boss Reclamation began Mulching contract. A total of 3 machines working 12 hours/day completed the project of 844 acres on December 22, 2018. 3B's Forestry completed the lop and scatter project totaling 2872 acres.
Project Narrative:
Project started on November 2018 by aerially seeding grass, forbs, and shrubs with a fixed wing aircraft. Aerial seeding contract was completed by Hammond Helicopter. Contractor took 1 day to complete the project and did a great job. Seed was consistently even throughout. Mulching contract started on October 22, 2018. Boss Reclamation was awarded the contract. Boss Reclamation began work within 14 days of the contract start date. A total of 3 machines (Barko) averaged 12 hours per day. 806 acres total bullhog acres were completed on December 22, 2018. Contractor did an exceptional job in complying with the contract stipulations and finished a month and a half early. Project was completed averaging 15-20 acres completed per day. Machines were never down for mechanical issues and very little correction was needed with the contractor. Aerial seeding and mechanical mulching contract was let through IDIQ contracting process and administered by BLM and UDWR. 3B's Forestry was awarded a contract to lop and scatter 2554 acres through the a state contract and was administered by BLM and State employees. Contract was completed within a two week time frame and met all specifications in the contract. Hammond Helicopter was awarded a state contract of 319 acres to treat with spike (tebuthiron) Hammond completed the project within one day and covered the area completely and followed all specifications in the contract.
Future Management:
Project area will be monitored for veg trend, cover and wildlife use for the next 3 years. The project area will be rested from livestock for a minimum of 2 complete growing seasons in order to allow the seedlings to become established and set seed. This rest period may be extended if monitoring shows the seeding has not sufficiently established. Maintenance of the project will be completed in the future.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
6675 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
8171 Terrestrial Treatment Area Herbicide application Aerial (fixed-wing)
8171 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
8172 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
8172 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
8173 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
8173 Terrestrial Treatment Area Herbicide application Aerial (fixed-wing)
8374 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
Project Map
Project Map