North Fork Ashley Creek Habitat Enhancement Project
Project ID: 4493
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Kevin Faucher
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Ashley National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
This project will improve fish habitat and overall fisheries quality on the North Fork of Ashley Creek. The North Fork of Ashley Creek is a popular fishing location and home to the Colorado Cutthroat Trout (CRCT), a species of conservation need. The improvements will be accomplished through implementation of a fisheries enhancement project which includes building large woody debris (LWD) structures and placing large rock into the stream. This in turn will increase pool depths and cover.
Location:
The project location is approximately 12 miles west of Highway 191 via the East Park Highway (Forest Road 10020) where Red Cloud Loop road crosses the stream at North Fork Ashley Creek Bridge at T1S R20E Sec. 9.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The purpose of this project is to improve fish habitat conditions on the North Fork Ashley Creek near the campground at Red Cloud Loop. This location has historical been noted as an important location for CRCT and other fisheries habitat. Habitat structures installed as a part of a previous enhancement project did not withstand flow events within the past decade due to inadequate ballasting. This project would utilize proven methods to withstand high flows and create deep pools, increase cover, and other factors needed for fisheries improvement.
Objectives:
This project aims to create durable structures with the stability necessary to enhance habitat for the long term. The goal of this project is to improve pool habitat by decreasing the width/depth ratio, increasing pool depths, and increasing cover. These enhancements would result in improved habitat for CRCT, brook and rainbow trout, and hence improve recreational fishing.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If project the project does not occur fishery condition may continue to degrade., affecting recreation and CRCT success in the stream reach.
Relation To Management Plan:
Ashley's Land and Resource Management Plan: Riparian Objective #1 -- Maintain or improve riparian areas and riparian dependent resource values including wildlife, fish, vegetation, watershed, and recreation in a stable or upward trend. Manage for species diversity. (p. IV-45 and 46) *Maintain natural complexity and high relative productivity of riparian areas. *Riparian areas will be given a high priority for rehabilitation in range improvement, fish and wildlife improvement, watershed restoration, road maintenance, and KV programs. CRCT Task Force. 2001. Conservation agreement and strategy for Colorado River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus) in the States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Colorado Divison of Wildlife, Fort Collins. 87p.
Fire / Fuels:
The majority of the logs used for the structures will standing dead road side trees. Removal of these fuels will provide some reduction fire risk.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Structures are designed in a way to sort gravels and fines. This sorting should produce favorable spawning habitat conditions.
Compliance:
Archaeology clearance is complete for the in and near stream portion of the project. Road side trees to be used as logs will not be harvested from known archaeological site. All trees selected for harvest and skid area will be surveyed for archaeological sites. If a site is found a new tree will be selected. NEPA is nearly complete and will be complete before the project is initiated . The project will done under a Categorical Exclusion. This proposed action may be categorically excluded from documentation in an EIS or EA as directed under FSH 1909.15, Chapter 30, Section 32.2, Category 7: Modification or maintenance of stream or lake aquatic habitat improvement structures using native materials or normal practices. And Category 13:Salvage of dead and/or dying trees not to exceed 250 acres, requiring no more than 1/2 mile of temporary road construction. The proposed action may include incidental removal of live or dead trees from landings, skid trails, and road clearings. A Joint Stream Alteration permit from Army Corps of Engineers and Utah Division of Natural Resources will be obtained.
Methods:
Structures will be built primarily as described in the California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual, VII, 1998, p. VII-39. Structures will be built using both hand crews and large equipment. Structures will be built from 18" to 24 " logs along with 24" boulders. Log structures will be attatched to boulders by drilling a hole through the log and 10" into the boulder. Threaded rebar will be inserted through the log and epoxied into the boulders. Large plate washers and nuts will then be added. The types of structures to be built will include v-notch weirs, upsurge weirs, enhanced point bars, log complexes, root wads, and log and rock barbs. Some logs and boulders will come from onside, however the majority of the material will be procured offsite. Large standing dead road sized hazard will be felled, skidded, and loaded on a logging truck and hauled to the project location. Boulders will be obtained from a local forest quarry.
Monitoring:
UDWR has been contacted and support this project. UDWR staff will assist in electrofishing surveys in regards to estimating the stream reaches fisheries population numbers. Surveys will then be repeated every 5 years to ascertain the effects the project has had on the fisheries. In addition pre-project cross section and a long profile was completed in 2017 and will be repeated directly after the project implementation and every 5 years there after. This will show geomorphic changes to the channel as a result of the structures.
Partners:
The importance of this project has been identified by both the USDA Forest Service and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources through financial support and/or other monitoring support of the fisheries as a whole. The Utah Conservation Corps will provide labor for the project through a participating agreement, which provides training opportunities for students that are exploring natural resources and is a partnership with Utah State University.
Future Management:
Area is used for livestock grazing and the project shall not have an effect on future livestock grazing. As for recreation, the project should increase fish populations and thereby improve future fishing and camping opportunities. If structures fail overtime, an adaptive management approach will be taken and the structures will be repaired or rebuilt.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
N/A
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$16,656.52 $0.00 $16,656.52 $23,822.00 $40,478.52
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services UCC hand crew with chainsaws for 3 weeks. $9,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (permanent employee) Forest Service Hydrologist 3 weeks; FS Forester 1 week; FS Equipment Operators 2 weeks $0.00 $0.00 $10,435.00 2019
Equipment Rental/Use Heavy equipment Costs, hand tools and safety gear. $0.00 $0.00 $12,130.00 2019
Contractual Services Timber Harvesting for structure logs. $6,481.52 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Log and boulder anchoring material. $875.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies 40 ft. (+) logs #28 2 ft. diameter boulders $0.00 $0.00 $915.00 2019
Personal Services (permanent employee) UWDR project lead for electrofishing. $0.00 $0.00 $342.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$16,656.52 $0.00 $16,656.52 $23,822.00 $40,478.52
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) $0.00 $0.00 $23,480.00 2019
Habitat Council Account HCRF $7,356.52 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $342.00 2019
Federal Aid (PR) P651 $9,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Brook Trout R4
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (Direct, Intentional) Low
Brook Trout R4
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures High
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) Low
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures High
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (Direct, Intentional) Low
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/10/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Miles Hanberg
Under the funding section, include Habitat Council as another funding source. Perhaps split the cost with the WRI item. This will allow the project to be considered for UDWR Habitat Council funding as well. It will ask for a funding percentage, list it as 100% sportfish.
Comment 01/10/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Faucher
I am relatively new to Utah. I am not able to find any information on the Habitat Council or there funding cycles and such. Do I need to contact someone to let them know I am listing them as a funding source? Is this something I do on the WRI application and somehow the council is notified? Do I need to present at some meeting? If so when?
Comment 01/24/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Miles Hanberg
Response sent via email.
Comment 02/02/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
To your list of habitats, I would add "Riverine". Then go through the threats and see which ones your project will reduce (if they're occurring here) or compensate for (if they're occurring elsewhere). Good luck, you'll figure all this stuff out. Welcome.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Faucher
Done. Thank you.
Comment 02/14/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
This is not my area of expertise, but could this project reasonably benefit amphibian species as well as fish? Northern Leopard Frog, perhaps?
Comment 02/14/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Faucher
Little too high for the northern leopard frog. Dan feels like it is a stretch as 99% of the amphibian species are Boral Chorus Frogs.
Comment 02/14/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
Sounds good. As I said, not my area of expertise, I just thought it would be worth looking at.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
6613 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Large woody debris/cover
Project Map
Project Map