Hall Creek Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) Project
Project ID: 4501
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 102
Project Manager: Michael Golden
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Dixie National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Support conservation and resiliency of remnant Colorado River cutthroat trout populations in historic habitat by providing for fish passage. Project will replace existing undersized, perched road culvert with a timber bridge and stream simulation, completing a series of five Aquatic Organism Passage projects to reconnect over 10 miles of habitat for remnant populations of Colorado River cutthroat trout.
Location:
The Hall Creek AOP project is located within Garfield County, Utah on the Escalante Ranger District of the Dixie National Forest approximately 14.5 miles northwest of Escalante, Utah. The project would replace a culvert in the Birch Creek subwatershed where Hall Creek is crossed by Forest Service Road 30150.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Colorado River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus; CRCT) are a Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the Utah Wildlife Action Plan, an Intermountain Region of the Forest Service Regional Forester Sensitive Species and are managed under a Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy to which the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) and the Forest Service are both signatories (). CRCT are the native trout to the Escalante River drainage and joint conservation efforts between the UDWR and the Forest Service have been ongoing for this species in this drainage since the 1990s (Hadley, Ottenbacher, Chamberlain, Whelan, & Brazier, 2008; Hadley, Golden, & Whelan, 2014). In 2011 the Forest Service completed a nationwide Watershed Condition Class Assessment. The Watershed Condition Class Assessment identified the Birch Creek 6th field Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) watershed (140700050102) as Functioning at Risk, with Aquatic Habitat/Habitat Fragmentation and its resulting threats to Aquatic Biota/Native Species as key watershed issues contributing the Functioning at Risk rating. Simultaneous to the Watershed Condition Class Assessment, the Dixie National Forest, as a signatory partner to the Escalante River Watershed Partnership (ERWP), was helping to develop and implement the ERWP's Ten Year Action Plan. The Action Plan calls for identifying barriers to fish passage that exacerbate other limiting factors in the Escalante River Watershed and removing those barriers. In 2011 the Dixie National Forest identified the Birch Creek watershed as a priority watershed because of it's Functioning at Risk rating, and the potential to move the watershed to a Functioning rating with the help of the ERWP. Birch Creek, Hall Creek and Water Canyon are all within the Birch Creek 6th field HUC watershed. The Watershed Action Plan developed for the Birch Creek watershed listed the following actions related to fish passage: 1) "Remove check dam barriers to fish passage, with emphasis for management for Colorado River cutthroat trout (CRCT)," and 2) "Remove culverts that impede aquatic organism passage, with emphasis for management for CRCT." In Federal Fiscal Year 2012 the Dixie National Forest received $780,000 to implement the bulk of the Birch Creek Watershed Action Plan, which included fish passage projects, as well as riparian and upland vegetation treatments, road decommissioning and road maintenance. All the projects were designed to improve watershed resilience and aquatic habitat for the benefit of the CRCT populations. Implementation included the 2012 removal of two Civilian Conservation Corps era grade control check dams, which were replaced with fish passable stream simulation, as well as the 2013 replacement of the culvert at the Forest Highway 17 crossing of Hall Creek, just upstream from its confluence with Birch Creek. The FSR 30150 road crossing was originally part of this project but had to be removed because of issues with the route designation under the Forest's 2009 Motorized Travel Plan. A subsequent Environmental Analysis Decision in 2015 (Mitchell Springs Vegetation Improvement Project) changed the route designation and paved the way to move forward with completing fish passage projects in the drainage. Replacing the culvert on FSR 30150 where it crosses Hall Creek will link all suitable fish habitat in the drainage; reconnecting 10.3 miles of stream and facilitating genetic exchange between Hall Creek and Water Canyon.
Objectives:
The overall objective of the Hall Creek AOP Project is increase the resiliency of the remnant Colorado River cutthroat trout populations in Water Canyon Creek and Halle Creek by providing upstream access to 2.6 miles of stream currently blocked by the perched culvert on FSR 30150, as well as to reconnect over 10 miles of occupied CRCT habitat and facilitate additional genetic exchange between these two remnant populations.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Currently the remnant populations in both Water Canyon Creek and Hall Creek both have relatively low densities of fish and occupy small stretches of stream, some of which can have marginal flows at times. Fish passage projects completed in 2012-2013 have allowed connectivity between the two streams via Birch Creek which functions as a travel corridor, but probably does not provide year round habitat between the two streams. The area upstream from the FSR 30150 culvert provides the best habitat for CRCT in that stream and currently contains the highest densities of fish. Without access to that section of stream following any future disturbances in the Hall Creek subwatershed, recolonizing fish from Water Canyon Creek may not be successful at reestablishing a population in Hall Creek. At this point $40,000 dollars of outside grants have been committed to the project for Federal FY 2018 and Calendar Year 2018. If the remaining funds are not acquired there is the risk of losing this funding and not being able to complete the project. The NFWF funds are match for non-federal dollars so if the TNC funds are lost, the probability of maintain, or reacquiring the NFWF funds is low.
Relation To Management Plan:
Utah's Wildlife Action Plan (WAP): The WAP identifies Roads and Transportation Networks as a High level Threat to Colorado River cutthroat trout and a Medium level Threat to Riverine Ecosystems with the following objectives and conservation actions: When existing roads are maintained, barriers to wildlife movement are altered to allow for movement. 2.3.11 Create selective fish passage structures at priority barriers. 2.3.12 Remove undesired instream barriers or consolidate multiple barriers where feasible. The proposed project would remove an instream barrier and create fish passage for Colorado River cutthroat trout. Range-Wide Conservation Agreement for Colorado River cutthroat trout/Range-Wide Conservation Strategy for Colorado River cutthroat trout Objective/Strategy 3: Restore or enhance CRCT populations Create metapopulations where possible - Where it is possible to protect larger drainages from invasion by non-native species, barriers should be removed to allow the reconnection of habitat within a metapopulations framework. This will ensure persistent gene exchange, as well as allow for the recolonization of habitats following local extinction. The objective of this project is to allow for gene exchange and recolonization potential throughout Hall Creek and with Water Canyon Creek. ESCALANTE RIVER WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP TEN-YEAR ACTION PLAN In the Conservation Action Planning process for the Escalante River Watershed fish passage was identified as an issue affecting native fish species implementing the proposed project would help meet the follow objective and action step from the Escalante River Watershed Partnership 10 year Action Plan. Objective 3.1 - Identify aquatic organism passage problems within the Escalante River Basin. Action Step 3.1.c - Implement priority aquatic-organism passage projects. The Hall Creek Aquatic Organism Passage project has been identified as a priority project by the Conservation Targets Committee of the ERWP. Dixie National Forest Birch Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan Identifies "Fish habitat fragmentation" as a primary concern and identifies the culvert on FR 30150 where it crosses Hall Creek as one of four fish passage barrier to be removed. The other three barriers were removed in 2012-2013. Dixie National Forest Land Resource Management Plan (as amended)- The Hall Creek Aquatic Organism Passage project would directly address the following goals and direction in the Dixie LRMP, by removing a fish passage barrier and replacing is with a geomorphologicallly sound structure that would allow for fish passage, as well as appropriate water and sediment transport. Goal 14 -- Improve the quantity and quality of aquatic habitats through direct habitat improvement and increased coordination with other land use programs (page IV-5). Goal 17 -- Managed Classified Species habitat to maintain or enhance their status through direct habitat improvement and agency cooperation (Page IV-6). This project will directly benefit core, remnant populations of CRCT. CRCT are an Intermountain Region Sensitive species and is managed under Conservation Agreement and Strategy that both DWR and the Forest Service are signatories to. General Direction: Riparian Management -- 5B. Select stream crossing points to minimize bank and channel disturbance. Maintain fish passage during all flow levels except peak flow events.
Fire / Fuels:
Replacing this culvert will maintain and improve the Forest's ability to manage vegetation in the area for forest health and fuels objectives, including the continued implementation of the Mitchell Spring Vegetation Improvement Project. Vehicle and equipment access will be improved to a 424 acre stand that is marked for a group selection harvest. Within this stand high tree densities are limiting growth and vigor, increasing the potential of tree mortality from insects and disease and elevating the risk of an uncharacteristically high severity fire (Mitchell Spring Vegetation Improvement Project EA is uploaded in attachments).
Water Quality/Quantity:
The current culvert on FSR 30150 is undersized and was not built to accommodate bankfull flows and natural sediment transport processes. Because of this the stream had widened upstream from the culvert and developed a scout pool downstream from the culvert. The new structure on FR30150 will have a natural bottom surface, with a span adequately designed for high and low flow maintenance of all aquatic species and flooding cycles. The structure will also allow for the passages of bedload and large woody debris, which will support the development and maintenance of channel structure. All of this should reduce channel erosion and the potential for road slope failure in the future, which could result in a large influx of sediment to the stream.
Compliance:
Culvert replacements for Aquatic Organism Passage are considered part of the Forest's road maintenance work.
Methods:
The Forest Service will contract out the removal of the current, perched, 24 inch diameter culvert and its replacement with a 16 foot timber crib bridge (Photos showing the existing culvert and an example of a timber crib bridge are attached). In order to catch grade and allow for fish passage through this bottomless structure, rock vortex weirs will be used as stream simulation of step pools through the location of the existing road bed, as well as for a short distance upstream. The Preliminary Engineering designs have already been completed for this project and have been uploaded.
Monitoring:
Fish -- UDWR and the Forest Service have two monitoring stations on Hall Creek that are visited every 5-7 years to monitor the status and trend of the remnant CRCT population in this stream using density, standing crop and occupied stream miles (Hadley et al. 2013). UDWR and DNF both summarize results of their sampling efforts in reports that can be uploaded to the WRI web site (see attachments).
Partners:
UDWR and Trout Unlimited personnel have visited the site and expressed support for the project. UDWR and Garfield County were partners on the three prior AOP projects in the drainage. The Nature Conservancy is a partner through the Escalante River Watershed Partnership and is providing funds toward the project via a private donor. ERWP has been a supporter of all fish passage work in the watershed and included fish passage and connectivity as a component of their 10 year Action Plan. Project is entirely on NFS lands.
Future Management:
The proposed project is part of a larger project to improve the function of the Birch Creek subwatershed. The Dixie National Forest has invested a considerable amount of time and money (over $1,000,000) to put our management focus toward MIS and Sensitive wildlife species in this area, including motorized travel plan implementation, road maintenance and drainage improvement activities, aquatic organism passage projects, riparian vegetation improvement projects, fuels reduction projects, forest health projects and monitoring. Hall Creek and Water Canyon Creek hold a remnant, core CRCT populations. Ensuring that representation of these CRCT populations are maintained and expanded is a UDWR and FS priority. Both UDWR and the Forest Service are signatories to the Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy for CRCT which will continue to direct management toward maintain and improving watershed function through projects, such as the one contained in this proposal.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Other than improving access to control livestock distribution the project does not have an appreciable effect on livestock management or forage. The project does benefit CRCT which have previously been proposed for listing under ESA. Projects to improve distribution and connectivity of CRCT populations help to reduce the risk of future ESA listing. If CRCT were ever to be listed under ESA, these streams would likely be proposed as critical habitat which could impact livestock use in this pasture.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$20,000.00 $132,335.92 $152,335.92 $23,960.00 $176,295.92
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Culvert removal and replacement contract $20,000.00 $132,335.92 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (permanent employee) Engineering and Design work $0.00 $0.00 $14,859.00 2018
Personal Services (permanent employee) Contract administration and project inspection $0.00 $0.00 $9,101.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$20,000.00 $132,335.92 $152,335.92 $23,960.00 $176,295.92
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
USFS-WRI N6795 $9,936.25 $0.00 $0.00 2019
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Funds committed through the Hemingway Foundation for work in the Escalante River watershed. $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2019
National Fish & Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) Funds committed through the Bring Back the Natives Program. $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2019
United States Forest Service (USFS) Funds committed through USFS/Trout Unlimited 1,000 culvert Initiative. In Kind funds are secured. $0.00 $27,335.92 $9,101.00 2019
USFWS Fish Passage $0.00 $65,000.00 $0.00 2019
United States Forest Service (USFS) These In Kind funds have already been expended on the Engineering and Design work, which is completed and uploaded in the attachments. $0.00 $0.00 $14,859.00 2018
Habitat Council Account HCRF $9,936.25 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Habitat Council Account QHCR $63.75 $0.00 $0.00 2020
USFS-WRI A056 $63.75 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network High
Habitats
Habitat
Riverine
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/25/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Nicki Frey
Mike, Same comment at 3946, What are the risks that this project will not be successful once implemented? Any?
Comment 01/26/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
It is my project so of course there is no risk of failure. Seriously, we have completed over a dozen culvert replacement projects since 2009 and the biggest risk of failure is in the stream simulation. The structure replacement is an upgrade and most contractors know how to put in a bridge or replace a culvert. I think we have a great team in our engineering and hydro shops right now and that all of us have learned a lot of lessons over the years about making sure we are active in project management to make sure stream channel design is implemented accurately for stream simulation. This is a small stream and the channel is rock controlled. Since the structures we're proposed will simulate the step pool structure already present in the stream I think the chance of failure is low. Additionally in other rock controlled streams where we have had some stream simulation failures, the stream itself has resorted the material into a fish passable channel that seems to be maintaining it's geomorphological integrity.
Comment 01/31/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Great low risk/high reward project! Love to see all the matching funds too.
Comment 02/07/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Thanks Clint!
Comment 02/07/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
When are you going to get your PhD - you certainly have written enough dissertations;) Just 1 question - what can you tell me about the value of the CRCT in this drainages value as a sportfish? Any creel data or at least a swag on how much use the resource gets as a sportfishery? Ok so that's 2 questions but they are highly related.
Comment 02/07/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
The lunker 6-10 inch CRCT in this 0.25-0.5 cfs stream are highly sought after by sportsmen from around the world. This stream gets limited to no fishing pressure that I am aware of. This project would be about providing genetic exchange and resiliency to disturbance for the two remnant populations in the drainage. Good questions Flynn.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
The word...is tenkara.
Comment 02/08/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Vicki Tyler
Great low risk/high benefit project. I like how you make some connections to other benefits, such as fire/fuels - travel - to a project that at first seems to be single species focus. Did you say the Escalante Watershed Partnership Group was a part of this effort. You may want to list them as a partner. Okay. Now for the questions. You mention some changes in stream morphology from the current culvert and other actions. Is there a plan to improve the drainage, outside of culverts? Could the changes in the stream meander/pooling/widening not also account for low numbers of CRRT. How certain are you that this culvert is truly the risk to the CRRT and movement? Are there other risks that need to be addressed to assure a population increase and/or movement. You mention "organism" passage. Is there more than this "organism" that needs passage, or is this just a figure of speech, per se. So, is this really the only species benefitting from this project? Creatively, I could think that having "easier/safe" passage for vehicles, and even large ungulates could be a stream sediment benefit. Okay, last question. You mention monitoring every 5-7 years. Isn't that a pretty long period of time. Fish could be gone in that period of time, and you would never even know what had happened? Is there any thought to stepping up the monitoring and seeing if this does indeed benefit the trout? Nice inclusion of other funding partners and description of threats/risk in losing partner $, Thanks Mike!
Comment 02/09/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Ms. Vicki, Thanks for pointing out I forgot to list ERWP as a partner as they have been supportive and their partnership is what led to the TNC funding that is a portion of this project funding. So in 2013 and 2014 the FS spent over $750,000 on vegetation management (including riparian conifer thinning), other AOP projects and road maintenance to improve conditions in the watershed. Additionally the District has additional vegetation treatments for Forest health and fuels reduction planned (Mitchell Springs Vegetation Improvement project - signed Decision) along Hall Creek. If I failed to mention that I will try to remedy in the proposal. Currently the habitat in both for both of the drainage remnant populations in the watershed (Hall Creek and Water Canyon Creek is marginal; however, much of this is natural conditions (low flows). The marginal habitat is probably why CRCT survived here because no one ever thought to introduce nonnative trout. However, the marginal habitat only increases the need for connectivity throughout the drainage to facilitate recolonization following disturbance. In terms of culver being a passage issue...did you look at my pictures? Seriously thought there are criteria developed by researchers in terms of what is passable and not passable to fish and the 3ish foot vertical drop off this culvert is much more than a native cutthroat can navigate. The other biggest risks are drought (see marginal habitat discussion above), introduction of nonnative trout (out of our control) and wildfire impacts to watershed function (see Mitchell Springs Vegetation discussion above). In terms of organisms. these types of projects will help with macroinvertebrate and amphibian passage of road crossings. There are a variety of macros, but amphibian surveys in the drainage have come up with nothing. I would not be surprised if there are tiger salamanders and boreal chorus frogs that we just haven't found yet. The only species benefitting I can list with a straight face is CRCT; however, I bet the Utah Milk Snake and Sonoran Mountain King Snake would benefit if they were present. UDWR controls the sampling regime on CRCT; however we do conduct distributional sampling in between the quantitative sampling schedule if we suspect a disturbance. Thanks for the questions/comments!
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
That's outside the known distribution of the milksnake, in x, y, and z dimensions. Mountain kings occur AFAIK on the west slope of that mountain but I do not know if they have been found in the Escalante drainage. There are many basic, basic remaining questions about that animal.They aren't the least bit riparian dependent, though where they are better-known they are easier to find (more abundant?) around water. This is near the top of their elevational range in Utah - but it could be great climate-change refugia habitat.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Any benefit planned or likely to the riparian (Aquatic - Scrub/shrub) habitat? Seems so to me, with restored water/sediment transport balance.
Comment 02/16/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Jimi. The project footprint is pretty small and the riparian area surrounding the stream is fairly narrow. The big benefit is to the stream channel itself and the organism. Maybe some marginal long-term benefits to riparian area immediately surrounding the culvert, but you are aware of my feelings on marginal benefit:-).
Comment 08/20/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion form early. It looks great. And thanks for uploading pics. It looks like a successful project.
Completion
Start Date:
11/01/2018
End Date:
07/31/2019
FY Implemented:
2020
Final Methods:
The Forest Service contracted out the removal of a perched, 24 inch diameter culvert and its replacement with a 16 foot timber crib bridge. In order to catch grade and allow for fish passage through this bottomless structure, rock vortex weirs were used as stream simulation of step pools through the location of the existing road bed, as well as for a short distance upstream.
Project Narrative:
We contracted the replacement of a culvert that was undersized, and a barrier to fish passage, with a bridge on Forest Service Road 30150 where it crosses Hall Creek. The goal of the project was to open access to 2.6 miles of stream above the site, a reach with some of the most suitable habitat in the watershed for native Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus). This creation of fish passage reconnects, and allows genetic exchange between, the now opened reach in upper Hall Creek which contained the highest densities of the fish, and the 10.3 miles of lower Hall Creek, Birch Creek and nearby Water Canyon Creek, which were occupied by lower densities of the fish. This new connection, along with previous fish passage improvement projects allows for greater resiliency and success of the two remnant Colorado River Cutthroat Trout populations, and to facilitate recolonization throughout the watershed as a whole. Additional benefits of the project include a huge reduction in risk of road failure due to the undersized culvert, macroinvertebrate and amphibian passage, and improved access to vegetation, fire, and fuels management, and recreation opportunities in the area. An important part of the project was instream structures, built of onsite rock, designed to create an even gradient and simulate step-pools that allow cutthroat trout to readily move up and downstream. After completion of the project fish were seen in the pools upstream of the new bridge.
Future Management:
Monitoring for fish populations are planned to be conducted at two monitoring stations on Hall Creek every 5-7 years. Bare areas will be seeded in the fall 2019 to prevent fine sediment erosion. Additionally several vegetation management activities are planned and ongoing to reduce the risk of high severity fire and improve watershed conditions for CRCT.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
1568 Fish passage structure Reconstruction Culvert
Project Map
Project Map