Regional Beaver Dam Analog projects (Northern)
Project ID: 4573
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 300
Project Manager: Clint Brunson
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Northern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
Many tributary streams in northern Utah have experienced channelization and incision resulting in lack of floodplain connectivity, impacting both fish habitat and water quality. BDA's have proven to be successful in the right conditions. Because BDA projects are being done with different levels of monitoring and planning, we propose this regional BDA project that capitalizes on the economy of scale for project development, execution, and monitoring by consolidating them into a regional effort.
Location:
Project locations are on small streams which have incised considerably and where the social and ecological conditions are suitable for BDAs, including North Eden Creek east of Bear Lake, Fish Creek on the South Fork of Chalk Creek, East Canyon Creek above East Canyon Reservoir, and several small streams in western Box Elder County.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Most of the streams listed in the project area have been significantly altered by land management actions, or direct channel modifications. For example, East Canyon Creek has experienced dramatic modifications over time. During the 1900's much of the stream was heavily grazed and then treated with herbicides to remove willows in an effort to maximize forage production for cattle. The resulting channel changes, including lateral bank erosion and channel incision greatly impacted ecological function, degraded water quality and in many cases, permanently altered the water table. Resultant headcutting has delivered fine sediments downstream, where water quality has been negatively affected. In East Canyon Creek historical mining also impacted water quality by releasing large amounts of phosphorus through fine sedimentation. As the area has developed, additional phosphorus-laden fine sediment has been released into the watershed along with dramatic changes in the hydrograph associated with development. These include a flashy hydrography and severely reduced flows. Ultimately the sediments are stored in East Canyon Reservoir. In Fish Creek decades of unmanaged grazing on an erosive geology have degraded instream and riparian habitat, plus upstream sediment sources continue to contribute significant amounts of sediment to the lower South Fork of Chalk Creek all the way down to Echo Reservoir. The project proposed herein would develop a similar design and construct to several of these structures on the Mormon Flat property (https://wri.utah.gov/wri/project/title.html?id=3787), using a conservation corps and volunteers to provide a bulk of the labor.
Objectives:
This project seeks to use constructed beaver dams as a tool to: 1) Maintain or enhance floodplain connectivity to reduce the stream energy during flashy high water events 2) Store fine sediment in the upper watershed and prevent it from being deposited into East Canyon Reservoir 3) Improve instream fish habitat
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
BDA's have proven to be an effective restoration strategy at reducing channel degradation within headwater streams. Primary threats addressed by this project include: 1. Continued headwater tributary degradation. This project is needed to begin reversing the trend of habitat degradation within the proposed areas. Continued degradation may result in increased restoration costs with future restoration. 2. Habitat for native fish is currently very degraded in these low-mid elevation low-order tributaries. BDA's reincorporate important habitat variability elements that provide habitat diversity. 3. As was observed in East Canyon Creek. BDA's function very effectively to store fine sediment on the floodplain. Fine sediment filtering is important for maintaining water quality and quantity for reaches downstream.
Relation To Management Plan:
The 2014 Weber River Restoration Plan indicated that the impacts from land development and management were major challenges to habitat and water quality in East Canyon Creek and the South Fork of Chalk Creek. This project compliments much of the past restoration work that has been completed in the watersheds in the past and implements new strategies in new areas to restore floodplain connectivity. Chalk Creek and all of its tributaries are currently listed as impaired waters by the Utah Division of Water Quality for elevated levels of Phosphorus, fine sediment and physical habitat degradation. In addition to the listed impairments, sections of Chalk Creek reach elevated temperatures during the summer, sometimes exceeding the known lethal limit for Bonneville cutthroat trout. Nevertheless, the strong cutthroat trout population is sustained through a partially connected network of habitat with thermal refugia throughout the watershed. The South Fork of Chalk Creek has the potential to be a significant coldwater refuge for Bonneville cutthroat trout, however past and current land management patterns result in significant heating along the longitudinal gradient of the creek and its tributaries during the summer. This is partially due to unmanaged livestock grazing in riparian areas
Fire / Fuels:
Healthy and robust riparian areas can provide a buffer against fires.
Water Quality/Quantity:
We expect to see the following water quality benefits: 1) Improved (colder) stream temperatures 2) Reduced fine sedimentation in riffles
Compliance:
This will be a noninvasive project. We will consult with the appropriate agencies to ensure that all clearances have been addressed. We will be completing a stream alteration permit for this project
Methods:
We will conduct monitoring with the Utah Wild Project of sites prior to BDA installation to assess their condition. We propose to develop a design plan during the summer of 2018 and implement in the late fall of 2018 using a combination of volunteers and contracted conservation corps individuals. Beaver Dam Analogs will be constructed based on design techniques using the ICRRR beaver restoration principles. The basic construction techniques include the use of sharpened lodgepole fence posts, approximately 3-4" diameter, which will be driven into the ground with a gas-powered hydraulic post pounder. The posts will be driven to a depth of approximately 1 m into the streambed. The posts will extend about 1 m above the channel bed depending on the stream. The posts will be spaced approximately 0.5 - 0.8 m apart. We will then weave willow branches or other tree branches that are available onsite between the posts to create a structure that will mimic a beaver dam. The concept is that the dams will last until sediment has aggraded behind the the dam. Riparian an emergent vegetation begins to grow and the stream channel aggrades and floods. We will place dams about 30 - 100 m apart, depending on factors such as gradient and degree of incision. After a year we will assess the health of the streams again and determine what progress has been made.
Monitoring:
In this proposal we are asking for funds to continue extensive monitoring of the success of this project. Staff from the Wild Utah Project have authored the development of a Rapid Stream-Riparian Assessment (RSRA) monitoring methodology (See Attached). The Wild Utah Project will participate in training UDWR and NGO biologists to conduct the assessment and will help conduct the "pre-BDA" assessments, to gather data on instream and riparian habitat function, and conditions prior to project implementation. RSRA is a comprehensive method of measuring multiple factors attributing to stream and riparian health, and uses both qualitative and quantitative field indicators that contribute to the final score of stream and riparian health and function. We will complement RSRA monitoring with aerial 3d surveys.
Partners:
Trout Unlimited Utah Department of Agriculture and Food Private landowners Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Wild Utah Project
Future Management:
Depending upon the rate at which the Beaver Dam Analogs are occupied by beavers, we will work with the landowners and project partners to use volunteers to continue maintenance of the beaver dams to ensure that they have the intended effect.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
We expect the project to improve riparian area productivity by enhancing the water table and serving as a local example of rangeland/riparian practices that can be beneficial to livestock, especially if they are paired with livestock management techniques such as off-channel watering and rotational grazing techniques.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$18,780.00 $2,500.00 $21,280.00 $1,500.00 $22,780.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies Purchase of wood posts needed to construct approximately 30 bdas (6 bundles of posts @ $600 per bundle). $3,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Other Pre - BDA installation baseline assessment and monitoring (instream and riparian function) on BDA sites prior to project implementation. This will also include training for UDWR employees in the baseline assessments survey protocol by Wild Utah Project $3,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,500.00 2019
Personal Services (seasonal employee) 4 technicians for four weeks and forty hours per week at approximately $12/hr = $7,680.00 $7,680.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Motor Pool $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Purchase saws, loppers, gloves, hammers and other tools and supplies for building BDA's $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Other Permitting costs for stream alteration permits for each project site. $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$18,780.00 $2,500.00 $21,280.00 $1,500.00 $22,780.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Habitat Council Account QHCR $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Patagonia $0.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 2019
Habitat Council Account HCRF $13,780.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Wild Utah Project IN-kind contribution includes time for Wild Utah Project biologist to train UDWR staff in the RSRA protocol $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 2019
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American Beaver
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Small Isolated Populations Low
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Unauthorized Species Introductions Medium
Brook Trout R4
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Low
Brook Trout R4
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures High
Brook Trout R4
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion/Loss Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Pipelines / Powerlines - Energy Development Low
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Unknown
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/30/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Thanks for the proposal, it's good to see consolidation into one bigger proposal. Judging from the photos this looks like a prime spot for BDAs. Hopefully you can affect a large enough area, and you get enough landowner cooperation, that you don't just create a "sacrifice area" that gets pounded to dust.
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Brunson
These areas selected are in cooperation with the landowners. They want us to improve their lands and BDA's will be a great benefit to them. They are all on board with making changes to their grazing strategies. Some of them have been changing over the past decade and some are in the initial stages of creating pastures and rotational grazing plans. We thought a regional budget would be the best way to go and use our resources to have the largest benefit.
Comment 01/31/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Paul Thompson
Consolidation of this effort into one proposal is a logical way to go. This effort will have a positive impact on aquatic habitats across the region. If some of the work will be in the Raft River system, bluehead sucker should be added as a benefiting species.
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Brunson
Paul, this is a great suggestion. I will add blueheads to the list.
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Is the current grazing program going to impede the success of the project? Is the landowner willing to make adjustments?
Comment 02/01/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Brunson
Scott, the landowners have approached us and asked us to help them. They are all currently changing or have changed their grazing regimes. Some are new to rotational grazing and others are not. Overall, they are willing to do what needs to be done in order to make this project a success.
Comment 02/08/2018 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
Will you upload all of the other project location (Summitt and Box Elder) to the WRI database.
Comment 01/22/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Kent Sorenson
This comment has been deleted by author or admin.
Comment 08/17/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 09/03/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
Is this completion report completed? If so please click on the finalize button on the completion form to let me know that you no longer need to make any changes/additions to this project.
Comment 09/09/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thanks Clint! I have moved it to completed.
Completion
Start Date:
07/01/2019
End Date:
06/30/2020
FY Implemented:
2020
Final Methods:
We completed pre-project Rapid Stream Riparian Assessment (RSRA) on the lower and upper Fish Creek, and Echo Creek. The RSRA is a very quick yet very effective way to look at the stream and riparian health before and after work is completed. You look at the stream corridor and riparian species in three different angles, from a distance, at a selected reach, and within the reach looking at aquatic vegetation, invertebrates, and geomorphology. It can be done in a couple of hours and processed just as quickly instead of days gathering information. We have secured stream alteration permits for Echo Creek, lower Fish Creek, and upper Fish Creek. During August and September of 2019, we completed two volunteer workdays where we installed 18 beaver dam analogs on lower Fish Creek. A secondary component of the Fish Creek effort was to collect detailed streamflow and shallow groundwater data to document subsurface storage and any effects that BDA construction would have on streamflow. The results are posted in the files section. The bottom line is that 18 BDAs had no effect on streamflow, even during construction, and that the shallow groundwater storage increased by approximately 0.6 acre feet. Changes in streamflow were caused more by seasonal events such as rainstorms and changes in evapotranspiration than by BDA construction.
Project Narrative:
We made great progress advancing both the science and application of Beaver Dam Analog work in the Northern Region with the completion of the projects described above. The most significant challenge for us was the constraint that COVID-19 placed on our implementation efforts. Using the hydraulic pounder requires close contact, and we did not think that we would be able to put sufficient safety protocols in place to protect volunteers. In the upcoming year, we are going to try to hire contractors to place the BDA posts using a small excavator with a vibratory plate where it is practical. We have the necessary permits in place to move forward with projects as soon as practical.
Future Management:
We view this suite of BDA projects as a long-term commitment as many of the BDA's will need to be refreshed over a period of years to ensure that they continue to function as intended. We will continue collecting streamflow, temperature, and shallow groundwater data associated with these projects to ensure that we have a good understanding of how these projects influence water fluxes. We will also continue to monitor using low-level drone imagery.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
6858 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
9627 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
Project Map
Project Map