Nixon WMA/Wide Canyon Phase III Project
Project ID: 4581
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 60
Project Manager: Kendall Bagley
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
This project will consist of two-way chaining and seeding estimated 516 acres of phase three pinyon/juniper, along with the instillation of 7,365' of water pipeline, one (1) trough and construction of 9,740' interior fence to help control grazing within the Nixion WMA. Project is located on UDWR Property. Project will also consist of working with the Fillmore Forest Service to construct a 24 Acre Fire Break for the Wild Goose/Wide Canyon Prescribed Fire.
Location:
Property location is on the Nixion WMA, located east of Holden, Utah within the Pahvant WMU. Project is located within T19 South Range 3 West, Sections 22 and 33, also in T20 South Range 3 West Sections 3, 4, and 5.
Project Need
Need For Project:
This project will address the need for increased forage through a two-way chaining within the eastern portion of the Nixion WMA. This chaining will benefit wintering mule deer, elk and wild turkeys along with adding forage for livestock grazing in the Nixion WMA. This project will address the removal of pinyon-juniper that has no understory of grasses, forbs and shrubs available for wintering wildlife. In addition to this project we would like to construct a interior fence to deffer grazing from the chaining treatment for two growing seasons, with this fence come a tool we can use to rotate livestock between pastures or allow the permittee to graze in the spring of the year at a lower intensity. We are also going to install a water trough and pipeline that will be connected to the pipeline that was installed in phase II of this project.
Objectives:
Objectives for this WRI project will consist of removal of phase III pinyon-juniper trees and reseeding grass, forbs and shrub components within the Nixion WMA through a two-way chaining project, this will allow for the removal of over 70 - 80% of the pinyon-juniper within the treatment area. Also associated with this project is a fuel or fire break that will be cut in along the east boundary of the WMA and the Forest Service, this will be done with the use of a hand crew, by doing this the Forest Service will be able to conduct a prescribed fire on the adjacent property that will allow for more of a fire resistant community with the addition of increased forbs, and grasses on the Nixion WMA through the two-way chaining project. In addition we will be installing another phase of the pipeline to distribute water within the WMA, allowing for livestock distribution to other areas of the WMA unit. An interior boundary fence will be installed to keep livestock from grazing on the chaining treatment for two growing years after implementation, in addition this will allow future opportunity for a rotational type system to improve and benefit the Nixion WMA for wintering wildlife and allow for better management of the livestock grazing practices. Overall with this project we should be able to see a better return and overall condition on forage values and less competition from noxious weed species due to over grazing in certain historical areas of the Nixion WMA.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
This project will address the threats of increasing pinyon-juniper, decreasing plant understory, risk of wildland fire frequency, and increased possibility of invasive species increasing on the landscape. By implementing this project the risk of increasing pinyon-juniper species will be addressed, and improved grass, forbs and shrub species will be increased and removal of pinyon-juniper stands will allow for reduced fire hazard and improved rangeland use by wildlife and livestock. No action on this project will allow for increased invasive grass and noxious weed species, pinyon-juniper encroachment and increased soil erosion with no productive rangeland conditions. Phase III pinyon-juniper reduces the native understory of grasses, forbs and shrub plant species, reducing pinyon-juniper will allow for shrub, forbs and grasses species to respond within the treatment site. With a good treatment and a aggressive seed mix we can hold off invasive noxious weed and grass species such as Cheatgrass, Scotch and Russian Thistle.
Relation To Management Plan:
The pinyon-juniper and big sagebrush areas lie within the Lowland Sagebrush, Mountain Shrub and Gamble Oak Steppe Habitat type which is several of the key habitats identified in the Utah Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Plan: The proposed projects will address some of the habitat management strategies outlined in the deer and elk management plans for herd unit 21B (Fillmore Pahvant Unit ) including: *Continue to improve and restore sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer according to DWRs Habitat Initiative. *Maintain habitat quantity and quality at a level adequate to support the stated population objectives while at the same time not resulting in an overall downward trend in range condition and watershed quality. *Work cooperatively with land management agencies and private landowners to plan and implement improvement projects for the purpose of enhancing wildlife habitat and range resources in general. *The project also helps fulfill the state mule deer management plan section IV Habitat Goal: Conserve and improve mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. *The proposed projects will address the following goals and objectives of the Division of Wildlife Resources most recent strategic management plan: *Resource Goal: expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. *Objective 1: protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. *Objective 3: conserve sensitive species to prevent them from becoming listed as threatened or endangered. *Constituency Goal: Achieve broad-based support for Division programs and budgets by demonstrating the value of wildlife to all citizens of Utah. *Objective 2: improve communication with wildlife organizations, public officials, private landowners, and government agencies to obtain support for Division programs. *UDWR SR critical big game winter range are important browse communities that need to be enhanced and improved. The Division will employ a variety of methods to achieve this including prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, reseeding and seedling transplants, also mechanical treatments. Priority areas will include sagebrush-steppe and mountain browse communities. Falls within the rangeland focus area for WRI wildlife species for mule deer and elk. Utah Wildlife Action Plan, 2015 Publication Number 15-14, State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources, Effective 2015-2025 -- Promoting and funding restoration that reduces the uncharacteristic and surpluses of older age class, including: Dixie/chain harrow, brush mowing or other treatments that reduce the older age class and stimulate the younger/mid age classes; herbicide or mechanical treatments single tree mulching/cutting of invading conifer. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule deer. Section IV Statewide management goals and objectives. This plan will address Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2013 (p11-12). Strategy C. Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that are being taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats. Strategy f. Encourage land managers to manage portions of pinion-juniper woodlands and aspen/conifer forests in early successional stages. Fillmore Pahvant Deer Herd Management Plan Unit #21 (2015) - Habitat Management Objectives -- Encourage vegetation manipulation projects and seeding to increase the availability, abundance, and nutritional content of browse, grass, and forb species. Strategies: Habitat Protection, Improvement and Maintenance - Reduce expansion of Pinyon-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinyon-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog and chaining projects; maintain summer fawning areas by increasing beneficial habitat work in summer and transitional habitat areas.(p3-4) *This plan is consistent with the Fishlake National Forest Plan for wildlife habitat enhancement and fuels management to improve habitat, reduce fuel loading, and protect against catastrophic wildfire. *Other project have been completed by the Forest Service and UDWR in past years within the Wide Canyon Canyon HUC 12 area. *Project within the are also benefit the management plans objectives of the lower Sevier River Watershed, as this will reduced sediment run off and create a healthy rangeland communities. *Management Plans are also in conjunction with NRCS overall goals of healthy rangelands and communities, improving watersheds and reducing erosion and sediment. The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment *FFSL CWPP Process is a local Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) is a collaborative plan created by the fire department, state and local forestry, land managers, community leaders, and the public.The planning process maps values at risk, and requires actions to reduce risk, such as prescribed burning, fuel reduction, or other measures that adapt a community to better confront their wildfire threat. Area is also part of the Millard RWPP FFSL Plan which was implemented in 2014, there are Wildfire Codes and Ordinances associated with this plan. Project would also be relevant to NCS Goals and supported through the FS National Cohesive Strategies. CAT FIRE Objectives and Strategies: In 2013, the State of Utah developed the Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy (CAT FIRE) in response to the severe 2012 fire season. Reducing the catastrophic wildfire requires attention to three interdependent goals identified in the National Cohesive Wildfire Management Strategy -- Restore and Maintain Landscapes, Fire Adapted Communities, and Wildfire Response. These goals have been embraced throughout the development of the state's CAT FIRE strategy. Mitigation of hazardous fuels can change fire behavior making it easier to suppress. The effects of the mitigation, however, are not limited to life and property safety but will also affect forest health, water quality, vegetative species abundance, etc. As we continue to implement projects across the landscapes in Utah, the only way to truly be successful is to integrate existing programs, utilize local and federal partners and continue to educate the general public to create the desired shift towards more resilient communities and ecosystems.
Fire / Fuels:
This project will have the ability to reduce fuel loading through the process of removing the pinyon-junpier trees with a two-way chaining treatment. The reduction of pinyon-juniper trees within this 516 acre treatment will allow for improved understory of grasses forbs and shrubs that will be seeded during the treatment. Treatments like this have been proven to prevent wildfire from spreading during an event, this treatment will create several barriers or buffers between treated and non treated areas that is critical for controlling or containing wildfires. The Fillmore Forest Service will be proposing a control burn to the east of this project in the Wild Goose/Wide Canyon area of the Pahvant Mtn Range. Several prior projects have been completed that reduced the likely hood of wildfire in the area and adjacent to this project, these projects consisted of clear cutting, burning and reseeding along with cut and pile projects. This project will help protect valuable infrastructures, from Catastrophic Wildfires, such as homes, summer cabins, outbuildings, hay sheds, livestock corrals and mostly the community of Holden, Utah which was effected by the Lower Ebbs Fire of 2016. Protection of water supply resources to Holden that support the residents is valuable this project will help protect the main source of water to irrigated farmland by the reduction of pinyon-juniper. This project will also have an effect on the I-15 corridor that is a critical travel corridor, and has been shut down in the past due to the Lower Ebbs Fire of 2016 and the Milford Flat Fire of 2007. The size of the Forest Service Prescribed burn treatment is around 3,000 acres and is within three miles of several structures including homes, and out buildings, and within five miles of Holden, UT. This treatment will reduce fuel loads and improve critical habitat for mule deer, elk and turkeys in the future, along with providing additional forage for livestock grazing within the Forest Service Property. I have also loaded some information pertaining to the FRCC and Fuel Loading along with the FFSL Risk Assessment of the project location. (See Attachment in Documents Tab)
Water Quality/Quantity:
This proposed project is a two-way chaining and reseeding project, pinyon-juniper stands are typical Phase III, no understory really dense stand, little to no grasses, forbs and shrubs. By implementing this project we will have the opportunity to increase overland water quantity by reducing the mature stand of pinyon-juniper trees. Removal of these trees will result in improved stream flow, more water discharge for soil availability for desired plant and shrub species. Estimated that 1 acre of pinyon-juniper will utilize during the year 23% of the water within a 1 acre foot. Quality of water will not be overwhelming the first year but over time it will become more improved. This type of treatment will benefit the soil over the long term, due to increasing plants that will utilize the excess water, overland flows of rills will be filled in, chance for overland flooding will be minimized allowing for springs and seeps to start appearing and improved rangeland conditions will benefit overall. The installation of the pipeline and watering trough will allow for cleaned water to be utilized by livestock and wildlife, the deliver system of the pipeline will be new and deliver the water to the trough with no water loss within the system..
Compliance:
Culture Resources will need to be conducted on the undisturbed treatment area associated with the Nixion WMA as it pertains to the two-way chaining aspect of the project. this will be contracted out through our State Purchasing guidelines and the Project Manager will work with Monson Shaver (UDWR) to coordinate this action. Monson Shaver (UDWR) will be able to conduct the survey for the pipeline and fence aspects of the project as most of these areas have been previously disturbed due to a past fire in the and an existing fence line that has been established. Project Manager will work with Monson Shaver to make sure all Culture Resource surveys are complete and SHIPO has been consulted.
Methods:
This project will consist of using two (2) D-8 cats to pull and "Ely" anchor chain on the first pass, with the second pass pulling a "Smooth" anchor chain. In between chaining the project will be aerial seeded with a mixture of grasses and forbs. We would also like to use a dribbler attached to each D-8 cat to allow the planting of browse species. Travel corridors will be kept intact allowing for thermal and escape cover for wildlife in the area. Culture Resource issues will need to be addressed on this project, this maybe worked as a joint effort through UDWR personnel. The other aspect of this project is to establish a pipeline to carry water from an existing pipeline that was installed last year on the phase II project. This pipeline will feed one watering trough within the Nixion UDWR WMA. This will be done by the use of a D-8 Cat to carry the spools of pipe, pipe will be installed below the surface and ripped in with the dozer. This project will be installed within the Nixion WMA Allotment, the UDWR and Pioneer Grazing Association will contract with a company that has experience working with this type of pipe and is set up with the proper equipment to have it installed. Permittees will help install the pipeline and watering troughs along with working along side the contractor to make sure the project runs smoothly. Fillmore Forest Service has looked at this project and is in favor of helping out the permittee to address the need of distributing water within the allotment. UDWR is also in favor as to utilize the Nixon WMA more fully as it pertains to the grazing management agreement in the spring of the year. In addition to this the UDWR will allow for a contractor to construct an interior boundary fence within the WMA that will serve as a partion fence for deferring grazing on the Nixion WMA two-way chaining treatment. We will contract all aspects of this project out, but UDWR and the Pioneer Grazing Association will have In-kind services overseeing the project.
Monitoring:
Monitoring methods will be looking at the increase in forage production and growth on browse species as it pertains to the removal of encroaching pinyon-juniper trees in the treatment area by the use of the two-way chaining . This will be done with photo points and vegetation studies that will be taken over time. Possible monitoring site maybe established by GBRC Range Trend Crew within the chaining project location. Additional monitoring plans will consist of wildlife monitoring through UDWR bi-annual deer classification to monitor production and subsequent survival on the Pahvant Unit Area deer and elk herds, along with implementing a rest rotational grazing system so the chaining treatment can be rested for two growing seasons after treatment then placed within a rotational grazing system. Monitoring the fence and pipeline portion of this project will be done an an annual basis looking for damage to the interior and exterior fence lines and also the pipeline aspect of the project, looking at the valves and the trough to make sure all components are functioning, repair and replace part if needed. This will be done by UDWR employees or seasonal's within the Region, also this aspect may be accomplished by the grazing permittee of the Nixion WMA. This project may also be monitored and repairs made by Dedicated Hunters through the UDWR Dedicated Hunter Statewide Program.
Partners:
Partnerships on this Nixion WMA Project will consist of the Fillmore Forest Service, Grazing Improvement Program and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, along with the livestock permittee. We have been successful in working with them to implement good projects within this allotment in the past few years, additional support has been leveraged through great partnerships looking for projects that will provide benefits to the local community, that protect the livestock grazing and wildlife within Millard County. Great efforts and strides have been made by Sportsmans Groups both local and state chapters to fund and benefit wildlife through habitat restoration enhancements.
Future Management:
Management of this project will be to ensure that the project is installed correctly, pipeline and watering troughs are set correct and all fittings are secure. The need to fix or repair items associated with this project will be left up to the livestock permittees who graze the Nixion WMA, they along with the UDWR will be working together to improve this WMA and improve the distribution of cattle during the grazing period. In addition to making repairs to the pipeline and trough system the UWDR and Permittee will agree on a grazing management system which may allow for additional time grazing on the WMA in the spring depending on the forage available. The chaining area will be monitored to make sure livestock grazing is not impacting the young seeding, as for the need of the interior fence that will help control livestock during critical times of year. Resting one pasture in the future will allow for additional seed growth and maturity and seed being set for future establishment. Working with the permittees will be critical that their needs are being met along with the goals of the UDWR as it pertains to the Nixion WMA Management Plans. As for the two-way chaining aspect of the project within a three-five year window we will be looking at the amount of whips left by the chaining and address the need to have them removed through hand thinning with a contractor.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
This project will be a great asset to help benefit the livestock portion of the project, by increasing the need for water in critical areas of this allotment it will be able to increase the overall utilization of the allotment as far as grazing additional areas that have not been grazed, reducing impacts of grazing on other areas. Water is critical within the allotment improved water will allow for longer use of the allotment time during drought situations, and in the fall of the year when water source have run dry, additional storage through the water trough will allow the livestock to maintain body weights and allow for better weighing weights for the producer due to traveling to different areas to water. Expansion of the water troughs increasing them in size will allow for additional storage, easy to water larger groups of cattle at once. The pipeline portion just allows better distribution of water decreasing the cost to the permittee of hauling water by truck to different locations. Livestock benefit from the two-way chaining will increase the forage within the Nixion WMA for improved grazing and livestock distribution within the WMA through the grass, forb and shrub mix that will be seeded during the chaining. The interior fencing project will allow for rest of the chaining treatment area for two growing years, in addition in the future we would be able to rotate pastures on the NIxion WMA or utilized one or both areas as a "Grass Bank" type system due to unforeseen wildfires like the Lower Ebbs Fire of 2016.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$166,246.25 $27,500.00 $193,746.25 $7,500.00 $201,246.25
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies Estimated cost associated with the purchase of 2" HDPE SDR 11 Pipe for this project Est. $1.25/Ft for 7,500 Feet. $9,375.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Other In-kind Services from the Grazing Permittee on the Nixion WMA, to help install pipeline, provide equipment, work with contractors on the fence and the chaining aspect of the project. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2019
Contractual Services Contract Services to hire out a contractor to complete the chaining portion of the project. 520 Acres at $110.00/Ac $57,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services Aerial Seeding of the chaining portion of the project, est. $25.00/Ac for 520 acres, includes both early and late flights. Cost split between UDWR and UGIP Funding. $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $0.00 2019
Archaeological Clearance Arch Clearances for the chaining, fence line, firebreak and pipeline portions of the project. Estimated $12,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Expenses for new trough and the associated valves and fittings. $2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Seed (GBRC) Estimated seed cost for the project, cost will be allocated between UDWR and UGIP funding accordingly. $31,290.00 $21,000.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services HDPE Pipeline 2" that will be installed under ground, est. Cost $1.25/ft for 7,365 feet of pipe. $9,206.25 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Estimated cost for flagging supplies, horse hire, fencing materials, pipeline materials, chaining materials that maybe needed to complete the project. $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Personal Services (permanent employee) In-kind Services from UDWR Employee $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Expenses to purchase fencing materials for building a 4 strand barbwire fence. 9,800' x $1.25/ft $12,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services Estimated cost to build a 4 strand barbwire fence on the WMA. 9,800' x $1.47/ft towards the construction. $14,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services Fire Break associated with the prescribed burn that the Fillmore Forest Service is implementing. 25 Acres x $425.00/Ac. $10,625.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$58,565.25 $27,500.00 $86,065.25 $7,500.00 $93,565.25
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Internal Conservation Permit NC360 ICP Elk $9,550.68 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) In-kind services from UDWR Employee towards this project. $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 2019
Habitat Council Account QHCR $5,353.41 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Internal Conservation Permit C011 ICP Elk $7,186.76 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Habitat Council Account HCRF $7,114.26 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Private Private In-kind from the Grazing Permittee towards this project. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2019
UDAF-Grazing Improvement Fund (GIP) Funding requested from UGIP Program towards this project. $0.00 $27,500.00 $0.00 2019
Habitat Council Account QHCR $12,532.33 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Internal Conservation Permit C011 ICP Elk $16,827.81 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Sonoran Mountain Kingsnake N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Sonoran Mountain Kingsnake N4
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Utah Milksnake N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Utah Milksnake N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Habitats
Habitat
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/31/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Vicki Tyler
Kendall, Nice, multi-benefit project. FS NEPA? Cultural? No NRCS $ (mentioned in the plans). If the USFS is burning, is this an in-kind cost? Will this be done in the very near future, or at a later date? Do you have plans to follow-up this chaining with a hand-thinning, at a later date. Please address this in the Future Management Section. Thanks!
Comment 01/31/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Vicki, Thanks for the comments, all the NEPA for the FS has been done and completed, I have uploaded a map of the FS prescribed burn area and when I get the information on the burn plan from the FS I can upload it as well. I will visit with Bryce on the estimated amount it will take to conduct the burn and we can possibly use it as in-kind match. The plan is to burn this fall pending conditions. No NRCS funding for this project but the permittee on the UDWR property is seeking funding from UGIP working with Tom Tippetts. I have addressed the follow-up of the smaller whips that will be left in the section you mentioned. Thanks Kendall
Comment 02/03/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Kendall, A lot of coordination with the FS this year. That is good to see. Comments and questions: 1) Could you elaborate on the current population status of Utah Milk Snake and Sonoran Mountain King Snake in the project area and how this project will improve that status? Also how will the project address the Housing and Urban Areas Threat as described in the WAP for Sonoran Mountain King Snake? 2) Is there a written agreement with the permittees that they will maintain fence, pipeline and whips following treatment? 3) Do you have any information on FRCC or fuel loading in the project area? 4) Any monitoring for wildlife listed as benefitting other than mule deer? 5) Any sense of future forage production from range trend sites on past projects in the area?
Comment 02/07/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Hi Mike, Kendall punted to me on this one. Current population status on those 2 serpent taxa in this area is "known to be present in the recent past, with no reason to think they're gone". Which in all honesty is about the very best we can hope for, given sampling effort from agencies (zero), academia (zero), or citizen scientists and "snake hunters" (low, and not helped by DWR's extremely restrictive harvest regs on them - statewide quota is 8 per year). For "improving that status", I'm applying the highest standard applied here (WRI) to terrestrial wildlife - given their physiology and life history, this project should improve individual fitness and population performance. Mechanisms would be 1) improved caloric intake (of small mammals & lizards) via enhanced primary production & primary predation respectively, 2) improved osmotic regulation via increased soil water and reduced canopy interception, 3) improved thermoregulatory opportunity space, via increased insolation, and finally 4) improved reproductive frequency and success, due to fatter females and more suitable egg-laying sites due to increased soil moisture and large woody debris. I concur on "Housing and Urban Areas" - which I don't see as a population regulator for this species in the Pahvant region. Iron County, sure. Here, not so much.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Thanks Jimi for the great information, I did remove the Housing and Urban Areas, unsure hoe that was in there in the first place. I appreciate your knowledge and information moving forward. Kendall
Comment 02/15/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Mike, I am glad I found this comment, hate to lose points when I can talk to you about this project. Jimi answered the comments about the two great snakes that i will be helping out with this project and the benefits they will be receiving. Here is the comments on the other questions that you had: 2) Working with the permittee over the last two-three years on projects in this area has been awesome, no issues, they are seeking UGIP funding for the project and are aware of the maintenance that will need to occur for this project to be successful, we can definetly put something in writing to secure or investment. 3)As far as the FRCC or fuel loading I had to dig deep to find this information I have uploaded it in the documents sections as it pertains to this project. I believe we are in the Condition Class III, but there has been wildfires in the areas north and south of the treatment area that have moved these areas to a Condition Class I. (Hope I am interpreting this information correct?). 4) no other wildlife monitoring will be done, although it would be great to have Dave Smedley involved and he may see a need to conduct raptor surveys in the area. 5) Forage should increase 10 fold, after the last fires in the areas that happened several years ago we have seen a great response in forage production, with the help from the FS and BLM we have installed water troughs over the last couple of years to better utilize the forage and distribute cattle in these areas. Last year UDWR extended the use on this WMA to the permittee due to the fact additional forage being present. As always Mike, you make the WRI projects better adding your comments and discussion. Thanks Again Kendall
Comment 02/07/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Way to bring matching dollars! Yea I would try to elaborate about the snake species benefits if you can considering they will add a few extra points, rankers will be taking a good look at the species list.
Comment 02/12/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Clint, I had Jimi Gragg look at this project and make comments on behalf of the two snakes that will benefit from this project. Please see comments from Jimi. Kendall
Comment 02/16/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Danny Summers
We are trying to move away from intermediate WG. Range trend has seen it dominate at too many locations especially in the long term. Bannock and Bannock II Thickspike WG are good native options. Also, a new study Ott et al. (2017) has showed our sage rates are too low (maybe try around 0.4 PLS/lbs ac) and that fall seeding is better for sage.
Comment 02/19/2018 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Thanks Danny for the information, I will make the changes to reflect your comments and reload the seed mixes. Kendall
Comment 08/11/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 09/03/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion form on time. It looks great. Thanks for uploading pictures!
Completion
Start Date:
06/22/2020
End Date:
10/29/2020
FY Implemented:
2021
Final Methods:
Final Methods for this project included setting three new watering troughs within the UDWR Nixion WMA, along with installing 11,499' feet of HDPE fusible pipeline, setting valves and fittings for the troughs. We also installed 9,100' of a 4 strand barbwire interior fence that will be utilized in a rotational grazing system on the WMA allowing us to rest a pasture from cattle grazing each year. The two-way chaining portion of this project along with the USFS Fire break was not funded during this Fiscal Year.
Project Narrative:
This project was partially funded through WRI, with the funding we where able to make some great changes and improvements to the Nixion WMA. UDWR and the grazing permittees worked together to improve water distribution along with rebuilding/constructing an interior pasture fence that would allow the grazing permittees the option of rotational grazing on the WMA. We installed three new water troughs around 1,200 gallons each that would serve the purpose of spreading out the livestock grazing on the WMA. The water troughs are also critical for wildlife use in the spring and summer months. As for the implementation UDWR contracted with Jed Heaton (Thirstycows.com) to install 11,499' HDPE fuseable pipeline along with help setting the Backwoods trough. UDWR contracted with Kolob Mtn Construction (Trey Wittwer) to install the 9,100' of barbwire fencing. The grazing Permittees put in a tremendous amount of time and effort towards this project, including installing one of the water troughs, they also provided equipment such as trailers, backhoes and UTVs to help move materials around and continue to work with the contractors until the project was complete.
Future Management:
Future Management will be determined by the UDWR SRO office and the grazing permittees, this WMA is a spring grazing allotment which takes place in mid May to the 15th of June. There are two permittiees who graze on the WMA, then move onto the USFS after the 15th of June. We have worked with the permittees over the last several years implementing projects like this that will benefit both livestock and wildlife within the scope of this project. The permittees will continue to maintain the water troughs and pipeline along with keeping the fence in good working order.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
992 Fence Construction Barbed wire
993 Pipeline Construction Below surface
2357 Water development point feature Construction Trough
2358 Water development point feature Maintenance Trough
2359 Water development point feature Construction Trough
Project Map
Project Map