Habitat Monitoring- Greater Sage-Grouse
Project ID: 4720
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 225
Project Manager: Natasha Hadden
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Vernal Ranger District
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
The objective of this project is to provide BLM, UDWR and USFS wildlife/land managers with scientifically based data that will aid in current and future land management decisions and plans by further enhancing the understanding of greater sage-grouse (GRSG) habitat requirements and use of the landscape. Currently there are gaps in the data, this project will be used to monitor GRSG use of habitat treatments (i.e. WRI projects), seasonal movements, and habitat requirements.
Location:
The project area would include GRSG population areas within the Green River District Area/ northeastern region of Utah.
Project Need
Need For Project:
There are GRSG populations Within the Green River District/Northeastern region where the agencies are lacking knowledge/information, including; seasonal movements and habitat requirements for GRSG. Currently there have been a number of habitat enhancement projects that have been completed in the project area. The habitat within the Northeastern region includes sagebrush that is in a state less than desirable condition because of poor sagebrush structure, monotypic age class, poor understory, and encroachment. Trend data has shown that the habitat projects completed through WRI and other means, have improved the habitat and provide better conditions for sage-grouse. Monitoring of seasonal use and habitat use will allow the different agencies to identify areas that have been successfully enhanced for GRSG and to collect data on areas that may need habitat enhancement or restoration for GRSG.
Objectives:
The objective of the GRSG monitoring is to provide BLM/USFS/UDWR with scientifically based data that will enhance the understanding of GRSG habitat requirements and movement patterns, along with helping design future habitat projects to benefit GRSG (i.e. WRI). The results of the monitoring will also allow biologists and land mangers to make better decisions for GRSG and their habitat.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The main threat is the continued lack of data and knowledge of GRSG population seasonal movements and habitat requirements. This lack of data could lead to the mismanagement of their habitats and also lead to inadequate land use policies.
Relation To Management Plan:
Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-grouse in Utah (2013): *Protection of habitat which provides for the year-round life-cycle needs of the species. *Protect, maintain, improve and enhance sage-grouse populations and habitats within the established Sage-grouse Management Areas. Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Management Plan 2009: *Objective B-1; Protect and maintain currently occupied sage grouse habitat and the ecosystems that sustain them. *Objective B-2.1,A;Increase the continuity of habitats by designing habitat projects on a landscape scale and working with multiple land management agencies, WRI, and private landowners. *B-3.2,A;Coordinate with and utilize the WRI evaluation crew to monitor and evaluate vegetative and sage-grouse response to habitat improvement projects. Utah BLM Greater Sage Grouse RMP (2015): Objective SSS-3: In all GRSG habitat, where sagebrush is the current or potential dominant vegetation type or is a primary species within the various states of the ecological site description, maintain or restore vegetation to provide habitat for lekking, nesting, brood rearing, and winter habitats. Objective SSS-4: Within PHMA, increase the amount and functionality of seasonal habitats Objective SSS-5: Participate in local GRSG conservation efforts (e.g., the appropriate State of Utah agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and local working groups) to implement landscape-scale habitat conservation, to implement consistent management to benefit GRSG, and to gather and use local research and monitoring to promote the conservation of GRSG.
Fire / Fuels:
The monitoring data will help to better inform the fire/fuels reduction treatments for the benefit of GRSG.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Not Applicable
Compliance:
No NEPA or archaeology clearances would be required.
Methods:
The project would be carried out by the purchasing of GPS transmitters which would be attach to sage-grouse in the fall/spring. The GPS transmitters will collect location data for each marked bird each day.
Monitoring:
Each GPS transmitter will collect data points every day. The data will be downloaded by UDWR and shared with USFS and BLM. The expected life-span of a GPS transmitter is three years.
Partners:
This project is a collaborative effort between BLM, USFWS, and UDWR.
Future Management:
The data will be used to inform future land use and habitat management for the the agencies involved.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Grazing will not be deferred for the project. Data collected could help direct management of season of use, and pasture rotation schedules.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$127,000.00 $0.00 $127,000.00 $0.00 $127,000.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Equipment Purchase UDWR will use the BLM/USFS funds to purchase GPS transmitters to assist the BLM/USFS in monitoring GRSG. The transmitters are considered Non- Capitalized equipment because they are expendable. $127,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$230,581.56 $0.00 $230,581.56 $0.00 $230,581.56
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM (Sage Grouse) N6732 $89,000 - Mod 11 --- $33,153.59 - RF from #2800 $6,428.96 $0.00 $0.00 2019
BLM (Sage Grouse) A041 $89,000 - Mod 11 --- $33,153.59 - RF from #2800 $43,390 - RF $9,791.14 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) N6462 Remaining funds from #2800 - $30,037.97--- Mod 12 - $35k $3,422.34 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) A008 Remaining funds from #2800 - $30,037.97--- Mod 12 - $35k $3,791.02 $0.00 $0.00 2020
BLM (Sage Grouse) A096 Mod 5 $15,949.83 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) A130 Mod 5 $6,588.24 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) A130 $51,236.37 $0.00 $0.00 2022
BLM (Sage Grouse) A096 $133,373.66 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Cheatgrass Impacts NA
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Research and Monitoring Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Roads – Energy Development Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Project Comments
Comment 08/24/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 08/31/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion form on time. I have moved this project to completed.
Completion
Start Date:
03/01/2019
End Date:
06/30/2022
FY Implemented:
2022
Final Methods:
Final methods included purchasing gps backpacks and data for Greater sage-grouse. Over the last 4 years 50 collars have been placed on grouse tracking their movements. The Ashley National Forest Service has also participated and purchased collars and data to track movements on the forest. Together the data is used to show connectivity of grouse across the landscape.
Project Narrative:
Grouse were collared on Blue Mountain, Diamond Mountain, in Three Corners and Clay Basin. Documented movements using the collar data has help design new habitat treatments as well as documented use in existing habitat treatments areas. Thousands of points have been collected showing grouse movements throughout the areas including grouse traveling into Wy and Co.
Future Management:
Future management includes the continued use of the gps collars which can be refurbished, as well as the purchasing of new collars and data. Collar data will be used to identify areas of grouse use and aid in the design of future habitat projects and potential maintenance of existing treated areas.
Map Features
N/A
Project Map
N/A