Black Mountain Fire Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation
Project ID: 4744
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2019
Submitted By: 1260
Project Manager: Lara Kitchen
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
This project will help in the stabilization of the land affected by the 2018 Black Mountain Fire. It will provide for aerial seeding of the entire burned area, as well as post-broadcast chaining where possible. The project will provide for the installation of erosion control structures where needed for stabilization of soil and mitigation of destructive flooding potential. The project will also provide for the reconstruction of range improvements that were damaged or destroyed in the fire.
Location:
The fire occurred in an area commonly known as the Black Mountains in both Beaver and Iron counties, with the bulk of the fire occurring in northern Iron County. The north end of the fire area is on Black Mountain and was approximately 3.8 miles to the southeast of Minersville, Utah. It extends to the southwest approximately 5.3 miles with a small section crossing to the west side of the Minersville Highway.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The 2018 Black Mountain Fire resulted in a direct loss of valuable shrubs, grasses and forbs on 4,797 acres of occupied greater sage-grouse brood rearing habitat.
Objectives:
The overall vegetation objective of the plan is to establish desirable vegetation in order to: * Provide for human life and safety by stabilizing soils within the Black Mountain Fire and eliminate the potential for dust formation and flash flooding along Minersville HWY (SR130) and along the Maple Springs Road. * Stabilize and begin re-establishment of important sage grouse brood rearing habitat, Utah Prairie Dog Habitat, and mule deer crucial winter habitat. * Minimize the production and composition of invasive, non-native species, especially cheatgrass. * Minimize soil erosion. * Prevent the introduction and spread of noxious weeds. * Minimize the potential size and severity of future wildfires. * Repair facilities (fences, water developments, etc.) to pre-fire conditions.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Some of the risks this project will help to mitigate include: -Safety hazard due to excessive flooding and debris on main roads, (SR 180) -Loss of habitat for Greater Sage-grouse, Mule Deer, Utah Prairie Dog, and other species -Introduction of invasive species and/or noxious weeds -Threat of re-burning if appropriate vegetation is not able to compete with invasives such as cheat grass -Loss of AUMs -Loss of biodiversity
Relation To Management Plan:
The proposed project is subject to the Cedar Beaver Garfield Antimony Resource Management Plan approved October 1st, 1986. The Proposed Action is in conformance with the LUP, even though it is not specifically provided for, because it is clearly consistent with the following LUP decisions (objectives, Terms, and Conditions): * Wildlife RMP objective D.1. states, "manage wildlife habitat to favor a diversity of game and nongame species." * Rangeland Decision B.1. Initiate management prescriptions affecting season of use, grazing systems and grazing use levels through formal grazing agreements, decisions or allotment management plans. Identified allotment objectives include in part: o Balance authorized use with production, o Ensure physiological plant needs are met, o Reduce area in poor condition by improving key species, o Improve habitat by improving quality of key species. * Soil/water/air RMP objective E.1. states in part to "Avoid the deterioration of or improve watershed conditions on all other Federal lands. * USDI BLM. Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management. (UT-USO-04-01). September 2005. * USDI BLM. Biological Assessment for the Proposed Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management. March 2005. * Standards and Guidelines for Healthy Rangelands and Grazing Management (BLM-UT-GI-98-007-1020). * USDI BLM WO IM No 2013-043. Greater Sage-grouse Interim Management Policies and Procedures. December 2011. * USDI USFWS. Utah Prairie Dog Final Revised Recovery Plan. March 2012. * Utah Prairie Dog Recovery Implementation Team. Population Structure for Utah Prairie Dog Recovery. Final Draft March 2013. * Iron County. 2013. Iron County Greater Sage-grouse Resource Management Plan. Draft. * USDI BLM. 2015 Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. DOI_BLM-UT-9100_2013-003-EIS. * Frey, S. N., S. G. Lupis, C. Reid, T. A. Black, T. A. Messmer, and D. Mitchell. 2007. Southwest Desert Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) Local Conservation Plan. Utah's Community Based Conservation Program. Unpublished Report. Logan, Utah.
Fire / Fuels:
Fire history data for the north slopes of the Black Mountains indicates that fires are becoming larger and burning with more intensity. This is primarily due to an increase in the amount of cheatgrass and, in some cases, dead and dying vegetation (increased dry fuels) in the plant community. The seed mixes proposed would generally be sufficient to create vegetation conditions, which would create a low intensity ground fire in the event the fire area reburns in the future. Under normal burning conditions, a fire in such a vegetation community could be fought relatively safely and kept relatively small, using traditional ground forces such as hand and engine crews.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Soil retention structures (small earthen dams) would be important to construct on small tributary drainages to control the flow of off-site water. These are easily created with a push of the dozer blade in strategic locations. Retention structures should be installed as early as possible, but no later than during the chaining operation. Further, retention structures should not be constructed in major drainages without proper design as such structures have proven to be ineffective. Additional special measures to reduce wind and water erosion, such as hydro mulching, matting, etc. in conjunction with re-seeding may also be implemented in problem areas. Coordination would be done with cooperators with knowledge of erosion reduction techniques, such as NRCS.
Compliance:
In accordance with the Standards for Rangeland Health, rangelands that have been burned, reseeded, or otherwise treated to alter the vegetative composition would be closed to livestock grazing as follows: (1) burned rangelands, whether by wildfire or prescribed burning, will be un-grazed for a minimum of one complete growing season following the burn; and (2) rangelands that have been re-seeded or otherwise chemically or mechanically treated will be un-grazed for a minimum of two complete growing seasons.
Methods:
The entire burned area will be aerially seeded. A selected portion will be seeded with a Utah Prairie Dog seed mix and the rest will be seeded with a general sage grouse mix. Areas that meet criteria for chaining will be chained following the seeding. Erosion control structures will be constructed as needed. Existing fences will be replaced.
Monitoring:
Establish a monitoring component that looks at sage-grouse habitat parameters in making a determination that habitat restoration objectives are being met. Monitoring and appropriate treatments of invasive noxious weeds would be completed in accordance with approved BLM policy. Noxious weed control would be in accordance with the Noxious Weed Control Environmental Assessment (UT-044-96-15) or other current NEPA, including appropriate mitigation and conservation measures as developed on a case-by-case basis would be followed.
Partners:
The BLM Cedar City Field Office will be working with Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative to complete this project.
Future Management:
A mandatory 2 year minimum rest period will be initiated for the portions of the allotments that were burned. Temporary fencing and rest rotation will be used to exclude livestock from the area until appropriate re-vegetation has occurred.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Five domestic livestock permittees were impacted by the Black Mountain Fire, with a temporary loss of 3,265 total AUMS on the two affected allotments. In the long term, this project will likely have an overall positive impact on domestic livestock grazing because of added forage value following seeding.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$732,066.00 $0.00 $732,066.00 $45,000.00 $777,066.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Seed (GBRC) State Mix-273 acres at $70.19 per acre (3,658 lbs) This seed will be mixed in with the BLM Sage Grouse Mix. $19,163.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Seed (GBRC) BLM Black Mountain ESR funding-Sage Grouse Mix-$336,721, 4,797 acres at $70.19 per acre (64,280 lbs). $336,721.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Seed (GBRC) BLM ESR funding UPD Mix- 804 acres at $55.77 per acre (8,281 lbs) $44,837.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Contractual Services Aerial Seed, 5,634 acres (273 state acres, 5,361 blm acres) at $15 per acre $84,510.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Archaeological Clearance Arch clearance for chained area $83,055.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 2019
Equipment Rental/Use Two D9 dozers for 1.5 months $73,080.00 $0.00 $36,000.00 2019
Equipment and/or Seed Transport Dozer transportation-two dozers round trip $7,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Materials and Supplies Fuel for 2 dozers for 1.5 months $81,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Equipment and/or Seed Transport Seed Transport $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$732,066.00 $0.00 $732,066.00 $45,000.00 $777,066.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM ESR $45,021.16 $0.00 $45,000.00 2019
DNR Fire Rehab N6775 $140,044.84 $0.00 $0.00 2019
BLM ESR N6723 Mod 12 $547,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2019
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Cheatgrass Impacts NA
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Pronghorn R3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Habitats
Habitat
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Project Comments
Comment 09/11/2018 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a note to let you guys know that a couple of the forbs that your have on your seed mixes are not available this year. We are going to make an attempt to purchase them but we don't expect to get enough for this project. Funding decisions have not been made yet but we wanted to at least give you a heads up on the seed situation this fall.
Comment 08/29/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please enter any missing expenses on the Finance page, update final features and fill out the Completion Form ASAP. Completion reports are due August 31st. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Also, don't forget to upload before, during and after photos of the project. Thanks.
Comment 10/04/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Will you upload final map features to the map page? After reading your completion form it looks like you will upload 2 features. One feature for the areas that were seeded and chained and then one feature for the areas that were only seeded. You will need to remove the shapefiles already uploaded in order to upload the new files. Thanks.
Comment 09/02/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Lara - Please see the above comment to see what still needs to be done to complete this project. Let me know if you have any questions about this. You should also be able to reach out to Liz Dodson for help on this.
Completion
Start Date:
07/05/2018
End Date:
03/21/2019
FY Implemented:
2019
Final Methods:
The entire Fire was aerially seeded and then areas of with allowable slope were chained with D-8 dozers and an Ely chain.
Project Narrative:
Fire was aerial seeded December 13-14, 2018 Two D-8 dozers were rented through the state contract by the Division of Wildlife resources. The Operators were provided by the BLM. Chaining was started November 8, 2018 and due to snow and freezing tempratures we elected to postpone chaining January 8,2018 until desirable conditions. Chaining was resumed March 4, 2019 and completed March 21, 2019. Fences were replaced in August 2019 and vegetation monitoring was completed within the fire perimeter in July 2019.
Future Management:
Mandatory two growing season rest from grazing will be enforced and then normal grazing rotations will be resumed.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
9648 Terrestrial Treatment Area Anchor chain Ely (2-way)
9648 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
9649 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
Project Map
Project Map