Pine Valley Fuel Break - FY 2020
Project ID: 4792
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 74
Project Manager: Devin Johnson
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Fremont Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Vegetation improvement and fuels reduction around the town of Pine Valley, Utah.
Location:
Project area includes USFS lands surrounding the town of Pine Valley. Legal Description is T39S. R15W. Sections 13-15, 21-24.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Within the last decade the Pine Valley Mountain range that surrounds the project area has had several wildfires (Forsyth Ridge 2008, Mill Flat 2009, Oak Grove 2016, Saddle 2017, West Valley 2018) with various impacts to forest health and the surrounding communities. The Pine Valley Ranger District is in the process of planning and implementing large scale watershed projects directly associated with the Pine Valley Mountain range and Wilderness Areas. The Grass Valley Creek Watershed project, Pinto Watershed Improvement project along with the New Harmony, Central and Pine Valley Fuelbreaks are all interconnecting projects that will provide the District additional management options and tools in future management activities. This Pine Valley Fuelbreak project is a crucial piece in the big picture. The Pine Valley Mountain is surrounded by several small communities (Pine Valley, Pinto, Central, New Harmony etc.) that need effective fuelbreaks and defensible fire spaces. All of the northside of the fuel break and part of the south side of the fuelbreak has been identified as being in Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) 3, and the remainder of the fuelbreak is listed in FRCC 2. Ideally we want to move towards Condition Class 1 (denotes that the vegetation resembles and is functioning as it did historically during the reference condition) and this project will help achieve this by removing encroaching PJ and reducing fuel loading. Additionally, implementing this fuelbreak will help achieve community safety objectives as outlined in the Pine Valley CWPP while opening up potential management decisions and options for the surrounding Wilderness Area to improve forest health and reduce the potential for uncharacteristically severe wildfire impacts. The Pine Valley area is encompassed by the Pine Valley Mountain range and is the head waters of the Santa Clara River drainage. The Pine Valley Fuel Break project area is within the Headwaters of the Santa Clara River HUC 6th Watershed in Washington County Utah which is part of the Virgin River System. These headwaters provide a critical water source to multiple municipalities which include the town of Pine Valley and the City of St. George along with many of smaller communities. The project area is in crucial summer and fawning range for mule deer. This area is part of the Pine Valley Mule Deer Management Unit #30. During the spring, summer and early fall months this area has high numbers of deer and can be see in high number within or near the campground. They come to water along the Santa Clara and feed on the long grasses and shrubs. The ponderosa pine stands provide shelter and security habitat. Project activities will sustain and improve these habitat components by removing encroaching conifer and seeding. This bowl around the town and recreation area has a high population of wild turkeys as well. The Rio Grande subspecies is mainly found on the Pine Valley Ranger District. The project area provides crucial grass and forbs to forage on and the ponderosa stands for shelter and roosting. The proposed treatments will greatly improve foraging habitat by removal of encroaching PJ and seeding. Improving and sustaining these critical foraging areas will help draw wildlife pressure away from the private property within the town of Pine Valley and inside the Pine Valley Recreation Area. The project area also encompasses the Pine Valley Reservoir and Santa Clara River tributaries that flow into Baker Reservoir which is foraging habitat waterfowl species and for bald eagles that feed mainly on fish. The District biologist surveys this reservoir and drainage for bald eagles annually during the winter months. This project will indirectly help protect and sustain bald eagle foraging habitat by improving the vegetation surrounding the water bodies and reducing the chances of a high severity fire impacts. These Santa Clara river tributaries also contain self sustaining populations of non-native trout (rainbow, brook and brown). The Pine Valley reservoir is a 'put and take' system reservoir that is stocked with rainbow trout throughout the summer months. The proposed treatments will help reduce the risk of large high severity fires in the surrounding area that would have negative impacts to this fishery from erosion, sedimentation and loss of riparian vegetation. In 1999 biologists from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources conducted bat surveys on the Pine Valley Ranger District (Day and Peterson 1999). One survey site was near the Pine Valley Reservoir adjacent to the project area. The bat species recorded at this site included; Yuma myotis bat, big free-tailed bat, and the Mexican free-tailed bat. The proposed treatments will help sustain these water sources for foraging bats by reducing potential negative impacts from large high severity fires and also improved the grass component that harbors insects that bats eat by thinning encroaching conifer and seeding. Day, K., C. Peterson. 1999. A Bat Survey of Selected Locations on Cedar City and Pine Valley Ranger Districts of Dixie National Forest, Utah: 1999. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Agreement No. FS-07-CCS-99-009. Cedar City, UT. The Needs include; Community wildfire risk reduction and restoring vegetative communities to fire resilient stages. 1. There is a need to construct and maintain an effective fuel break to reduce fire behavior in order to facilitate fire suppression and reduce wildfire risk. This will create an area of reduced resistance to control where fire managers can safely initiate appropriate actions to suppress an approaching fire. 2. There is a need to thin out the existing vegetation in order to move the ecosystem composition and structure toward Fire Regime Condition Class 1, which is a more historic fire regime and an indicator of a healthier forest. This will create a landscape with higher resiliency to disturbance and lower the risk of uncharacteristic fire adjacent to the community. 3.There is a need to bring current forested conditions closer to the desired healthier conditions as outline in the Northern Goshawk Standards and Guidelines (USDA 2000). 4. There is a need to maintain and improve the grass and forb component for wildlife habitat.
Objectives:
The project area consists of sage/grass meadows, mountain shrub/brush, mountain mahogany, Gambel oak, pinyon juniper and ponderosa pine/mixed conifer vegetation types. Pre-fuel break and current conditions consists of; ponderosa pine and mixed conifer stands with high accumulations of litter and dense understories consisting of shrubs and white fir. Total basal area in some areas above 120. Pinyon and juniper tree encroachment converting much of the grass and shrub lands into P/J woodland. In much of the mature juniper stands the understory has lack of diversity and is depleted. Cheat grass is also present, with higher concentrations in the lower elevations of the project area and within the mahogany stands. The overall desired future state would be to have an effective fuel break that simultaneously improves the forest health conditions in the Pine Valley area. The pinyon/juniper treatments will reduce encroached trees by 85 to 90 percent within the grass and shrub lands. Small patches and corridors of trees will be left for wildlife and aesthetical purposes. Within the ponderosa and mixed conifer stands, ponderosa pine, juniper and white fir trees will be thinned to reduced fuel loading, competition and improve forested stands. Additionally, juniper will be removed from along the stream portions of the project area allowing desired riparian vegetation to improve. The seeding phase of the project is crucial in establishing a desired grass component. The seed mix will consist of natives and non-natives that are more fire resilient, beneficial to wildlife and will compete with undesired annual grasses. The goal here is to reduce cheat grass creep into the fuel break areas.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
In 2018, the District completed the mastication phase of the project. We now face a tremendous risk for type conversion to cheat grass and other undesirable species if this area is not seeded. There are two Long-Term Vegetation Trend data sites within and surrounding the project area which includes sites #1893 and #1992 in the FS database (Madsen 2018). Both these sites are USFS upland trend studies indicating that currently these sites are in functioning condition however have bromus tectorum present. Values at Risk include: Pine Valley Town Residencies, Pine Valley Recreation Area/Campground, Pine Valley Municipal Watershed, Crucial Summer and Fawning Range for Mule Deer.
Relation To Management Plan:
1) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule deer (2014-2019). Section IV Statewide management goals and objectives. This plan will address Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019 (p 19). Strategy C. Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that are being taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats. The proposed treatments will removed encroaching PJ and other conifers that will improve foraging areas for mule deer. Seeding is crucial since it will improve plant diversity and help to reduce the spread of noxious weeds and undesired annual grasses. 2) Pine Valley Deer Herd Management Plan, Deer Herd Unit # 30 (2015) -Habitat management objectives: Maintain and/or enhance forage production through direct range improvements throughout the unit on winter and summer range to achieve population management objectives. 3) North American Mule Deer Conservation Plan (Mule Deer Working Group 2004). A) Mule deer habitat Objectives and Strategies-Develop and implement habitat treatment protocols that reduce the impacts of cheatgrass or other invasive plants. B) Manage mule deer habitat in a fashion to control type conversions (i. e., conversion of rangeland to croplands, and shrublands to monotypic pinyon-juniper stands) (Pg. 7). Seeding burned area will help reduce the impacts of cheatgrass in this area by establishing desired grasses and forbs. 4) National Fire Plan (NFP) - Primary Goals: 1) Improve fire prevention and suppression; 2) Restore fire adapted ecosystem. The National Fire Plan was developed in August 2000, following a catastrophic wildland fire season, with the intent of actively responding to severe wildland fires and their impacts to communities while ensuring sufficient firefighting capacity for the future. The National Fire Plan addressed five key points: Firefighting, Rehabilitation, Hazardous Fuels Reduction, Community Assistance, and Accountability. Hazardous fuels reduction is a key part of the National Fire Plan. Hazardous fuels reduction treatments are designed to reduce the risks of catastrophic wildland fire to people, communities, and natural resources while restoring forest and rangeland ecosystems to closely match their historical structure, function, diversity, and dynamics. Such treatments as within the proposed Pine Valley Fuel Break project will accomplish these goals by removing or modifying wildland fuels to reduce the potential for severe wildland fire behavior, lessen the post-fire damage, and limit the spread or proliferation of invasive species and diseases. 5) Accompanying (NFP) 10 year Comprehensive Strategy - Guiding Principles: 3) Prevent invasive species and restore watershed function and biological communities through short-term stabilization and long-term rehabilitation; 4) Restore healthy, diverse, and resilient ecological system to minimize uncharacteristically severe fires on a priority watershed basis through long-term restoration. Seeding the fuel break area will help mitigate encroaching invasive species. 6) In 2014 the Secretary of Agriculture signed the National Strategy: The Final Phase of the Development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy (USDA, USDOI 2014), known as the Cohesive Strategy. This project reflects the Cohesive Strategy as it aims to provide a safer environment in which to fight fire near the town of Pine Valley. It aims to treat vegetation and fuels in an area identified as high priority consistent with the Cohesive Strategy. Collaboration has occurred between the Forest Service and the town of Pine Valley and this project has been listed in their Community Wildfire Protection Plan. This project also addresses all three goals defined by the Cohesive Strategy: * Restore and maintain landscapes: focuses on ensuring landscapes across all jurisdictions are resilient to fire related disturbances. This project will make the town of Pine Valley more resilient to fire disturbances. This fuel break will also allow for greater flexibility while managing the surrounding landscape with regard to fire disturbance. * Fire-adapted communities: focuses on creating human population centers and infrastructure that are able to withstand a wildfire event without loss of life or property. This project will result in Pine Valley becoming a more fire-adapted community. * Wildfire response: focuses on having all jurisdictions participate in making and implementing safe, effective, efficient risk-based wildfire management decisions. This project is a result of multiple jurisdictions (US Forest Service, Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands, Washington County Emergency Services, and the Pine Valley Fire Department) identifying ways to provide for safe wildfire response to fires in the vicinity of the project. 7) The Utah Fire Amendment (USDA 2001c) amended the Dixie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). The Utah Fire Amendment considered alternatives for managing the problems created from excluding fire from the landscape. Fire exclusion in forested ecosystems is "one of the primary factors responsible for the increased size, intensity and severity of wildland fires...[and] has led to uncharacteristically high fuel loadings" (p. 1-1). The Utah Fire Amendment provides forest plan direction to use naturally ignited fire to aid in meeting desired conditions on Dixie National Forest lands. Using naturally ignited fires to enhance the vegetation composition on the landscape is meant to help reduce the threat of uncharacteristically large fires to human life, property, and cultural resources, and it will also help reduce fire suppression costs. This project will reduce the fuel loadings surrounding the town of Pine Valley by expanding and improving the existing fuel break around the community. In addition to using natural ignitions, treatments described in the National Fire Plan are accomplished using prescribed fire, mechanical thinning, herbicides, grazing, seeding, or combinations of these and other methods. Increasingly, treatments are being focused on the expanding wildland/urban interface (WUI) areas throughout the Dixie National Forest. The Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) defines WUI as: * An area within or adjacent to an at-risk community identified in the Federal Register or in a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) * An area that is adjacent to an evacuation route for an at-risk community that the Forest determines, in cooperation with the at-risk community, requires hazardous fuel reduction to provide safer evacuation. The Utah Fire Amendment states that fuels treatments like the one we are proposing would occur in an effort to decrease the hazards associated with using natural ignitions to treat the landscape. "Under Alternatives B [the selected alternative] and C hazardous fuels surrounding property could be reduced and together with reasonably foreseeable future mechanical treatments, the risk from wildland fires would be reduced" (USDA 2000c: 3-6). 8) State of Utah-Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy-Protecting the health and welfare of Utahns and our lands. Recommendations- 5. Adopt key recommendations from the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy- Encourage federal land management agencies to expedite fuels treatments. 9) Utah Wildlife Action Plan (2015-2025). Terrestrial Key Habitats (pp 56-57): Mountain Shrub-Threat, invasive plant species. Terrestrial Key Habitats (35-36): Gambel Oak-Threats, Ivasive Plant Speices and Inappropriate fire frequency and intensity. Seeding the project area will aid in reducing the threat of invasive plants and reducing fire intensity or chance of high severity impacts. 10) Strategic Management Plan for Wild Tukey-Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR 2014). Grasses provide food for adults and are especially important to poults as an environment where they can effectively forage for insects. Poults need an environment that produces insects and in which they can efficiently forage. Poults need an area that provides enough cover to hide them, but allows the adult hen unobstructed vision for protection from predators. Seeding will help establish desirable grass and forbs to provide insect habitat for wild turkeys. 11) Dixie NF Noxious Weed Management Plan (EA 2000). The noxious weed that is the most concern in the project area is Scotch Thistle (p 1-4 EA). The objective is to stop the spread of existing noxious weed infestations and prevent invasion of new sites or new noxious weeds. The basis for these prevention and control measures are National Policy: FSM 2080 (DNF Noxious Weed Plan 2000, Appendix G). Seeding the project area followed by monitoring will reduce the chance of noxious weed spread. 12) DNF Forest Plan Goals and Objectives (USDA 1986): Forest-wide Goals and Objectives Goal No. 45 -- "Develop a well planned and executed fire protection and fire use program that is cost efficient and responsive to land and resource management goals and objectives" (USDA 1986b: IV-12). Goal No. 48 - Ecosystems are restored and maintained, consistent with land uses and historic fire regimes, through wildland fire and prescribed fire (USDA 1986b: IV-13). Forest-wide Direction Wildland Fire Suppression: Standard- "Human life (firefighter and public safety) is the highest priority during a fire. Once firefighters have been assigned to a fire, their safety becomes the highest priority. Property and natural/cultural resources are lower priorities" (USDA 1986b: IV-54). Fuels: Guideline -- "Reduce hazardous fuels. The full range of fuel reduction methods is authorized, consistent with forest and management area emphasis and direction" (USDA 1986b: IV-54). Prescribed Fire: Guideline -- "Prescribed fire is appropriate forest wide" (USDA 1986b: IV-54). Scenery Management System: "Restore, maintain or enhance landscape scenic quality across the variety of landscape types found on the Forest that meets the needs identified for the allocated use within each management area" (USDA 2000c: 9). 13) Healthy Forests Initiative (2002): The Healthy Forests Initiative (HFI) was launched in August 2002 with the intent to reduce the risks severe wildfires pose to people, communities, and the environment. By protecting forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands from unnaturally intensive and destructive fires, HFI helps improve the condition of our public lands, increases firefighter safety, and conserves landscape attributes valued by society. The Pine Valley Fuel Break project achieves these objectives: by reducing fuel loading, seeding with a more fire resilient grass mix, increases firefighter safety by having a effective fuelbreak, and protects scenic, recreational attributes. 14) Healthy Forest Restoration Act (2003): The purposes of this Act specific to this project are (1) to reduce wildfire risk to communities, municipal water supplies, and other at-risk Federal land through a collaborative process of planning, prioritizing, and implementing hazardous fuel reduction projects; (2) to enhance efforts to protect watersheds and address threats to forest and rangeland health, including catastrophic wildfire, across the landscape; and (3) to protect, restore, and enhance forest ecosystem components
Fire / Fuels:
Forest fuel buildups can fuel intense wildland fires along the National Forest/private land boundary (WUI). Lack of fuel break effectiveness will compromise the safety of the public and firefighting resources. There is a need to improve and expand the fuel breaks around Pine Valley to help increase the chances that forest resources, private lands, and developments can be less susceptible to threat of damage from wildfire. An intact fuel break will reduce the risk of uncharacteristic wildfire effects from human caused wildfires that spread from private lands onto forest lands. The fuel reduction project is designed to reduce fire behavior and provide conditions that provide for low resistance to fire control by reducing/altering fuels. The project is designed to limit potential flame lengths during wildfires to less than four feet under 97th percentile weather conditions. To accomplish this, the fuel break includes the following features: * Fuel break would be a minimum of 400 feet wide. *90 corners would be eliminated to the extent possible on the National Forest System lands by widening and rounding the fuel break boundary. * 85 to 90 percent of the understory vegetation would be replaced with a less fire prone species that would serve as a green strip around the populated area. * Intermittent and perennial streams containing any deciduous vegetation that enhances stream or floodplain stability would be retained. Treatment area will be seeded with a more fire-tolerant seed mix which would also improve the diversity of vegetation for wildlife.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The Pine Valley Fuel Break project area is within the Headwaters of the Santa Clara River HUC 6th Watershed in Washington County Utah which is part of the Virgin River System. These headwaters provide a critical water source to multiple municipalities which include the town of Pine Valley and the City of St. George along with many of smaller communities. The proposed project objective is to reduce heavy fuel loading that surrounds and includes the Pine Valley Municipal Watershed and infrastructure, and the Santa Clara River headwaters. It has been shown that removal of dominant stands of juniper may have beneficial impacts to the watershed. Water interception and use from by juniper can cause a reduction in forbs, grasses and shrubs in the spaces between juniper canopies (Bedell et. al 1993). Additionally, dense juniper stands can release large amounts of sediment during a rain and snow storms (Ibid). One study showed PJ mulching fuels treatments in Colorado increased the graminoid, forb richness ground cover overall (Fornwalt et. al 2016). Mastication of P/J followed by seeding the project area will help move towards the desired outcome of having an increase of grass, forb, ground cover soil moisture component that will reduce high run-off events and erosion issues into the head waters of the Santa Clara. In 2004, the Utah Division of Water Quality put out a report titled "TMDL Water Quality Study of the Virgin River Watershed" (UDEQ, 2004). In sections 6.3.8- Santa Clear River: Baker reservoir-Pine Valley and 6.3.9- Santa Clara River: Pine Valley Area and the Headwaters, states 'natural hill-slope erosion' as one of the sources of pollutant loadings. The Santa Clara River is the main source of water for the town of Pine Valley and flows down into the Pine Valley Reservoir and then into Baker Reservoir. Once again, the critical importance of seeding the project area within the masticated areas to establish and improve the grass, forb and ground cover that are adjacent to the Santa Clara River drainage will help to reduce the total amount of phosphorus loading flowing down stream into Baker Reservoir. Additionally, implementing this fuel break will allow managers to plan and implement future vegetation projects within this area that will make this watershed less prone to uncharacteristically large and high severe wild fire events that would have negative impacts to water quality and quantity from high levels of erosion and run-off. The riparian areas associated with the project will be treated as well. This includes removal of juniper and white fir and thinning conifer while leaving desired riparian vegetation along the stream corridors. Bedell, T.E., Eddleman L.E., Deboodt, T., C. Jacks. 1993. Western Juniper-Its Impact and Management in Oregon Rangelands. Oregon State University-Extension Service EC 1417. Fornwalt, P. Rocca, M., Battaglia, M., Rhoades, C., M. Ryan. 2016. Mulching Fuels Treatments Promote Understory Plant Communities in Three Colorado, USA, Coniferous Forest Types. Forest Ecology and Management 385 (2017) 214-224. UDEQ, 2004. TMDL Water Quality Study of the Virgin River Watershed. Utah Department of Environmental Quality. EPA Approval Date: September 20, 2004.
Compliance:
NEPA was completed in 2016. SHPO-Arch clearance completed. USFWS ESA concurrence completed. The NEPA decision has been attached for reference under the Documents Tab.
Methods:
A variety of methods and treatments would be available to the Forest Service to use to carry out this project. This includes heavy equipment with mulching heads which turn the debris into mulch, or chainsaws used to cut vegetation. The resulting debris would be scattered, piled and burned, and/or chipped with a chipper. The acres treated in the mountain brush fuel type would be implemented with either heavy equipment or by hand with chainsaws where slopes do not exceed 30 percent; and by hand with chainsaws in the timbered areas and on the slopes over 30 percent in the mountain brush areas. This project is an extension to WRI project #4450 that was proposed in FY2018. Unfortunately this project was not funded and we were unable to get in-kind funding for the seeding. However, in FY 2018 the Forest Service received in-kind funding (approximately $285,000) to contract out approximately 800 acres of mechanical mastication treatment. This mechanical treatment was completed in fall of 2018. Under this proposal, we are asking WRI for funding for the aerial application (Approximately $12,000 for State contract) and seed mix (approximately $25,914 from GBRC) on the 800 masticated acres.
Monitoring:
Forest Fuels Ecologist and District Fuels Specialist will conduct pre-treatment analysis (Brown's Transects etc.) and post-treatment analysis at 1, 3, 5 and 10 year increments. Forest Botanist will continue to monitor Long-Term Vegetation Trend data sites within and surrounding project area which includes sites #1893 and #1992. Forest fisheries biologist surveys approximately every 5 years along the Santa Clara river headwaters (Left Fork, Middle Fork, and Right Fork) and has 2-3 years of baseline data for those sites including for 2017. District biologist conducts pre and post photo points to record changes in vegetation generally within the first year and third year following treatment. Monitoring of Forest Management Indicator Species (MIS) that includes wild turkey and northern flickers occur annually within the project area. The Brown's point and Pine Valley Flicker transects are within the project boundary. Wild turkey's are counted during bald eagle surveys near Pine Valley Reservoir during the winter months, post treatment monitoring will include summer habitat conditions within the ponderosa pine vegetation type. The Forest utilizes UDWR monitoring data for mule deer and elk population status, objectives and habitat conditions that include winter surveys and Utah Big Game Range Trend Studies. Monitoring efforts and data will be gathered by District biologist and entered into the WRI database (photo's and documents).
Partners:
USFS, UDWR, USFWS, DNR, Washington County, Utah Forestry Fire and State, Pine Valley Fire Department, Special Services District, Community Wildfire Preparedness Plan-Pine Valley, Pine Valley Cattle Allotment Permitees. Scoping included at least two public town meetings at the local Fire Department building. Portions of the project where implemented during the Saddle Fire of 2016 during fire suppression efforts.
Future Management:
Portions of the project area is within the Pine Valley cattle grazing allotment. This allotment contains 6 pastures units, runs roughly 800 cow/calf, and is on a deferred rotation system. The majority of the project area is within the North and South Unit pastures, that is adjacent to the town of Pine Valley and the Pine Valley Recreation Area Campground. This unit is approximately 7,500 acres of the 60,540 acre allotment. The steep slopes and rock outcroppings along the southern portion of the project area generally make it inaccessible for livestock. Livestock tend to use the lower valleys just outside of town. Currently there are plans to improve and construct fencing around the Pine Valley Recreation Area and campground within the east side of the project area. This will help to keep livestock out of the campground portions of the fuel break area which would help seed to establish. Seeding the project area by establishing and improve forage will help to keep livestock on Forest System Lands and alleviate grazing pressure on private lands in Pine Valley. This project will be broken up into phases so the entire project area will not be impacted at the same time. Herding, salting and fencing will also be used to allow proper rest. This project will add to the ability for the Dixie National Forest to allow to use naturally ignited fires to be used in the Pine Valley Wilderness to move toward a more natural fuel loading and age diversity of the vegetation with in the wilderness itself. When we completed the NEPA for this project we included the ability to maintain the effectiveness of the fuel break by routine maintenance projects. This will help protect this investment in the future. The recreation aspect within this project area is huge, especially within the Pine Valley Recreation Area and campground which is one of the most visited on the forest. Our trail maintenance program is on board with how these treatments will impact the recreation resource. Mitigation measures are in place (visuals and access) for future management with this resource and its complex trail/wilderness system. The Pine Valley reservoir is adjacent to this project area. Bald eagle, raptor and other wildlife surveys are performed annually at this site which will aid in determining overall forest health and habitat suitability. As mentioned in the needs section, the District is currently completing NEPA and/or implementing two other nearby watershed projects (Grass Valley Creek Restoration, Pinto Vegetation Improvement). This project along with these other watershed projects will give managers opportunities to use fire as a tool to improve the overall Forest health. The Santa Clara Fuels reduction project in this area which has been ongoing since 2004 has had great success. This project has reduce fuel loading and conifer encroachment within the Ponderosa pine stands and riparian areas as well. Creating these small opening and removing encroaching conifer has yielded improve foraging areas for wildlife, this area has a plethora of wild turkeys and fawning mule deer.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Implementation of this project will improve foraging habitat for both wildlife and livestock. Heavy fuel loading will be reduced thus allowing sunlight to penetrate the forest floor to allow grasses, forbs and shrubs to perpetuate. Seeding the project area is critical in maintaining and improving the palatable vegetation. Improving the quantity and quality of the grass and forb component on Forest System Lands may help alleviate the grazing pressure on adjacent private lands in the town of Pine Valley as well. Portions of the project area is within the Pine Valley cattle grazing allotment. This allotment contains 6 pastures units, runs roughly 800 cow/calf, and is on a deferred rotation system. The majority of the project area is within the North and South Unit pastures, that is adjacent to the town of Pine Valley and the Pine Valley Recreation Area Campground. This unit is approximately 7,500 acres of the 60,540 acre allotment. This project will also tremendously help sustain recreational uses. The project area completely surrounds the Pine Valley Recreation Area and Campground, one of the most visited on the Forest. This area is one of the main access routes to the Pine Valley Mountain Wilderness Area with several trailheads and associated trail systems (Whipple trail, Brown's point trail, Forsyth Canyon trail, Canal trail, Equestrian trail, Goat Springs trail). Millions of dollars have been spent to upgrade this campground within the last decade, including a complete upgrade of the Pine Valley Guard Station. It also encompasses the Pine Valley Reservoir which is a 'put and take' fishery and is heavily used during the summer months. This project is critical to help sustain and protect these important investments by making it less prone to uncharacteristically high severity crown wildfires and to improve the overall Forest health. The Pine Valley area is known for its large ponderosa pine stands within the lower bowl. Currently, other conifer species have heavily encroached into these vegetation types. The project includes improving these ponderosa pine stands by thinning smaller diameter trees and removing encroaching conifer species. This will help sustain these timber stands by reducing competition and ground cover which will promote a heathy uneven aged forest with small openings of grasses, forbs and shrubs. Improving and sustaining these pine stands will allow managers options to treat and provide potential timber sales in the future as conditions allow.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$65,697.00 $0.00 $65,697.00 $27,682.00 $93,379.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
NEPA $0.00 $0.00 $27,682.00 2016
Archaeological Clearance Cultural resources inventory for 1,323 acres x $21/acre = $27,783. $27,783.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Materials and Supplies Seed Mix GBRC $25,914.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Aerial Contract ($15.00 per acre) $12,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$69,666.00 $0.00 $69,666.00 $27,682.00 $97,348.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) NEPA $0.00 $0.00 $27,682.00 2016
United States Forest Service (USFS) A049 $31,752.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
DNR Watershed U004 $9,478.50 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Federal Aid (PR) P651 $28,435.50 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Big Free-tailed Bat N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Brook Trout R4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Brown Trout R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Waterfowl
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Low
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Project Comments
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Devin, I'm not sure how important this project actually is for big free-tailed bats. As long as PV Reservoir exists, they will be there, probably even if the water is not clean. Keith
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Great comment- My reasoning on the benefits to bats was based on potential impacts to foraging habitat such as riparian vegetation and the grass/forb components that perpetuate insect prey species. Implementation of this project will help reduce the chance of a large, high severity fire that may cause huge negative impacts to this area and seeding would help sustain and improve the grass component.
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Vicki Tyler
Devin, in looking at the map, it appears that the project footprint covers some previously-treated areas. Will the entire project area be seeded, and if so, are the mixes the same, given that one area is post-mechanical treatment and one area would be pre-mechanical treatment. In looking at your costs for mastication, is the USFS going to do this in house? It looks like you are allocating about $175/acre for treatment, given all acres are treated? If there is a mix of vegetation types (timber/shrub, etc.) is this cost realistic. How can the rankers better understand what will be treated with the tools, costs and vegetation conditions? What does your desired condition look like when you are done?
Comment 02/15/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Vicki- Sorry for the confusion, there was some changes that were corrected in the details and finance sections. Last fall in 2018, the USFS completed the mastication acres using in-house funding using the State to contract out the work. Total acres of this mastication portion was approximately 800 acres of the 1,733 project area. The approximate cost of the mastication work was around $292.00 an acre. We are wanting to seed the 800 acre post mechanical mastication portion of the project at this time. The second phase of the project is to hand thin, cut and pile, chip/burn areas in ponderosa pine stands and areas that are greater than 30 percent slope within the pinyon-juniper/curl leaf mountain mahogany and mountain brush treatment areas. This second phase will be approximately 933 acres and will take place as funding dictates in the near future.
Comment 02/17/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Vicki for further clarity, this is an follow up to project 4450 in the WRI database. 4450 did not receive funding but the Dixie Forest Fuels shop had funds for the mastication work it ended up running through UWRI. Unfortunately there was no budget for seed and we were unable to come up with internal funding to seed. Hence the second ask from UWRI now that the Forest has completed the mastication. Devin, since the $285,000 shows up in project 4450 we can't use it as match here. You need to refer to that project and tell the story of this being and extension, which it looks like you have mostly done.
Comment 02/20/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Mike-I went back into the Finance section and got rid of the contracted $285,000 that was spent last year on the mechanical treatment. I also added some wording to the Methods section to help further define the proposal.
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Vicki Tyler
What is IRA in you seed mixes - maybe I missed something? So, if the mastication was completed last year, why wasn't it seeded then? Will seeding this after the mastication is complete be effective? It seems that cheatgrass may already have a competitive advantage and that seed incorporation may be difficult, if the treatment is already complete in some areas?
Comment 02/15/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
The original plan was to get the project area seeded before the mastication phase. We did submit the same project last year for seed and aerial contract through WRI, unfortunately it was not funded. The District feels that seeding would still be highly effective and crucial even within the recent mulched areas given the topography, soil types and the risks associated by not seeding. The IRA (inventoried road-less areas) seed mix falls mostly within the second phase of the project area which is not part of this proposal. An updated seed mix has been attached which will cover the entire 800 masticated acres.
Comment 02/17/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Devin! Hope you get the money to seed this so it doesn't become amber waves of cheat grass. You might want to look at the Partner Inclusion section of the ranking sheet and discuss how different partners were involved and if there was discussion (or has been implementation) of fuels treatments on private lands that abut the project.
Comment 02/20/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Hey Devin - very well written proposal, and potential to be a great project but there are some aspects about it that make me nervous. With all the snow on the ground up there right now what are the chances we see an explosion of cheatgrass this spring? If we do we may just be throwing this money away without dealing with that threat. I have seen some projects have some success drill seeding into previously bullhogged areas, would this area be conducive to that? I think that has a better chance of seeding success than just aerially applying a year later - do you have any data from similar projects (aerial seeding on mulched areas 1 year later) that can help me feel better?
Comment 02/20/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Devin, Buy him a case of lemonade and he'll feel better;-).
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Hey Gary, those are legitimate concerns that we have discussed as well. Within the NEPA we included the option to drill seed if needed and can still be a tool to use if deemed appropriate. However, a lot of the masticated areas have some rocky surface that a drill would not be successful. Additionally, these areas were very dense with encroaching conifer and has left a lot of mulched debris on the surface (see attached photo's in Images/Documents) that we felt the drill would not be that effective. I feel we are still in a good window to seed since the mechanical treatment just ended last fall and there is a good seed bed, where seeds can harbor in the mulch and rocky crevices. The WRI funded the New Harmony Fuel Break a few years ago after the mechanical treatment took place. We had good results with that seeding especially with the crested wheat and orchard grass. With that said, it's hard to predict with cheatgrass, we feel there is a greater risk of mono cultures of undesired grass if not seeded.
Comment 03/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
Devin, GBRC does have some smaller drill options that could be more strategically used for priority areas. One is our 'baby' rangeland that is basically just a smaller version of the regular rangeland drills, but can be pulled by a truck or bigger side-by-side. We also have a couple of atv drill options, but if there is a lot of rock these may not be an option.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Devin - Will you re-upload your map feature as a terrestrial treatment instead of affected area? Thanks.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: N/A
Thanks Alison, New terrestrial treatment map has been up-loaded.
Comment 08/26/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion report before the deadline. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion.
Completion
Start Date:
01/10/2020
End Date:
01/17/2020
FY Implemented:
2020
Final Methods:
The Pine Valley Fuelbreak seeding contract was combined with the Pinto Phase I project seeding contract since both were in relatively close proximity near the towns of Pinto and Pine Valley, Utah on the Pine Valley Ranger District, Dixie National Forest. The aerial application began January 10, 2020 and was completed by January 17, 2020. The contractors were staged at the Hurricane Utah Airport. Approximately 800 acres was aerial seeded by fixed wing aircraft using one seed mix at roughly 9 lbs per acre.
Project Narrative:
In fiscal year 2019, the Pine Valley Ranger District received funding from WRI to mechanically treat some 982 acres of vegetation surrounding the town of Pine Valley, Utah which included portions of the Pine Valley Recreation Area and Campground. In general, the objectives were to reduce the amount of pinyon/juniper, mountain mahogany and thick mountain brush within the fuel break area, feathering the outer edges of fuel break, thin from below ponderosa pine stands removing undesired conifer species, removing undesired encroaching upland vegetation in riparian areas, pile burning, and seeding. The mechanical/mastication portion was completed in 2019. The seeding treatment did not receive funding at that time. During post project visits, District personnel determined that seeding would still be a vital element to the project area and would help achieve desired conditions for a viable fuelbreak and improvement of foraging habitat for wildlife. There was discussion on what type of application would be the most successful. It was determined that a large portion of the project area was in rough, rocky and sloped topography. Mechanical equipment such as the range drill or harrow would not be effective based on these factors. Being that the project area contained ample amounts of micro-sites with the rough terrain and mulch from the mastication treatments it was decided that an aerial application would be best. The seeding portion of the Pine Valley fuelbreak project received funding during the current 2020 cycle of WRI funding and was implemented in January of 2020.
Future Management:
The Forest Fuels Ecologist and District Fuels Specialist will conducted pre-treatment analysis (Brown's Transects etc.) and will conduct post-treatment analysis at 1, 3, 5 and 10 year increments. Forest Botanist will continue to monitor Long-Term Vegetation Trend data sites within and surrounding project area which includes sites #1893 and #1992. Forest fisheries biologist surveys approximately every 5 years along the Santa Clara river headwaters (Left Fork, Middle Fork, and Right Fork) and has 2-3 years of baseline data for those sites including for 2017. Monitoring of Forest Management Indicator Species (MIS) that includes wild turkey and northern flickers occur annually within the project area. The Brown's point and Pine Valley Flicker transects are within the project boundary. Wild turkey's are counted during bald eagle surveys near Pine Valley Reservoir and the Santa Clara River headwaters during the winter months, post treatment monitoring will include summer habitat conditions within the ponderosa pine vegetation type. The Forest utilizes UDWR monitoring data for mule deer and elk population status, objectives and habitat conditions that include winter surveys and Utah Big Game Range Trend Studies.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8096 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-helicopter)
Project Map
Project Map