Red Ryder Precommercial Thinning
Project ID: 4826
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 216
Project Manager: Jeff Sanocki
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
Utilize a variety of mechanical methods to reduce tree density, improve stand structure in order to promote larger tree growth while improving vegetation structure, species composition, and age classes that would contribute to providing healthy and diverse habitat for a variety of wildlife species, as well as a resiliency to future insect and disease infestation.
Location:
1,002 acres along the Eastern boundary of the Uinta-Wasatch- Cache National Forest , Logan and Ogden Ranger Districts. Units are both located in Rich and Cache county. Legal Description: Salt Lake Meridian, Township 13 North, Range 4 East, sections 22-29, 33-35; Township 12 North, Range 4 East, sections 1-4, 9-15, 22-26, 36; Township 11 North, Range 4 East, sections 1, 12, 13, 24; Township 11 North, Range 5 East, sections 5-8, 15-23, 28-29).
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Red Ryder project proposes using a combination of commercial timber harvesting, precommercial thinning, and prescribed fire to improve vegetation structure, species composition, and age classes that would contribute to providing healthy and diverse habitat for a variety of wildlife species, as well as a resiliency to future insect and disease infestation, on approximately 13,081 acres that have experienced substantial tree mortality due to mountain pine beetle infestation. This involves implementing a suite of activities including: vegetation treatments associated with commercial timber harvest (i.e., group selection, shelterwood, stand clearcut with leave trees, and two-aged shelterwood) and precommercial thinning; fuel treatments not associated with vegetation treatments (i.e., broadcast burning).
Objectives:
Improve vegetation structure, species composition, and age classes that would contribute to providing healthy and diverse habitat for a variety of wildlife species, as well as a resiliency to future insect and disease infestation. -Release previously harvested stands from stagnation so that they progress toward a mature forest structure suitable to wildlife species requiring late successional habitat. -Enhance and restore habitat for wildlife including big game, federally listed species, sensitive species and migratory birds. -Reduce the current effects of tree mortality associated with the mountain pine beetle and spruce beetle epidemic in order to restore healthy ecological conditions and scenic quality. -Manage stand composition and structure within lodgepole pine and mixed conifer stands that, in turn, would provide for a diverse mosaic of habitat types thus reducing the susceptibility of future large scale insect and disease outbreak. -Proactively manage hazardous fuel loads associated with current and predicted mountain pine and spruce beetle infestation in order to: minimize the likelihood of catastrophic wildfire capable of destroying habitat; and enable the protection of adjacent lands and infrastructure.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
In recent years, the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest has seen impacts within its forested lands as a result of mountain pine and spruce beetle infestations. In some areas, these infestations have reached epidemic levels that has resulted in substantial mortality to the Forest's coniferous tree species. Forest health assessments, conducted within the Red Ryder project area in 2013 and again in 2016, indicate high levels of decline and mortality within the lodgepole pine and mixed conifer stands as a result of mountain pine and spruce beetle infestations. This existing condition, combined with projected drought stress; frequency of dwarf mistletoe; and the stands' homogeneous structure and age class (with a majority existing in a state of over maturity), is predicted to increase the scale of future insect and disease outbreak to surrounding stands if left untreated. Delaying treatment will result in increased cost in the future as the subalpine fir continue reproducing and increasing in size; therefore, becoming more difficult to remove along with larger diameter lodgepole pine. Any additional delay in treating this stand will create a perfect breeding ground for mountain pine beetle, which thrive in high density stands that are heavily competing.
Relation To Management Plan:
Forest Plan of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Forest wide Goals: 3-Biodiversity & Viability, Goal 3d, Goal 3f., Goal 3g. Goal 3o., The project is consistent with the following Forest Plan Ojective: 3.d. Increase grass and forb production and plant species and age class diversity in sagebrush and pinyon/juniper by treating approximately 2,000 acres average annually1 for a 10-year total of 20,000 acres. Utah Elk Statewide Management Plan: Statewide goal A, Strategy r.Properly manage elk populations to minimize competition with mule deer on crucial mule deer range. Habitat Management Goal B: Habitat Objective 1. Maintain elk habitat throughout the state by identifying and protecting existing crucial elk habitat and mitigating for losses due to human impacts. Strategies A. and B. Habitat Objective 2:Improve the quality and quantity of forage and cover on 250,000 acres of elk habitat with emphasis on calving habitat and upper elevation elk winter range by the end of this plan. Strategies c, d e, h. and j. Recreation Objective 1: Maintain a diversity of elk hunting opportunities. Strategies d) Assist state and federal agencies with the development of travel management plans. Statewide Management Plan for Mule Deer: Habitat Goal and Habitat Objective 1, Strategies a, and b. Habitat Objective 2 and strategies, B, C, D, E, F and H. Habitat Objective 1: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. d. Minimize impacts and recommend mitigation for losses of crucial habitat due to human impacts. Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. e. Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah. f. Seek opportunities through the Watershed Restoration Initiative to improve aspen communities that provide crucial summer habitat for mule deer. DEER HERD UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN, Deer Herd Unit # 2 (Cache) ELK HERD UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Elk Herd Unit # 2 Cache: Habitat objective: Maintain and/or enhance forage production through direct range improvements throughout the unit on winter range to achieve population management objectives. Pay special attention to WMA's and areas were holding elk could alleviate pressure on private landowners experiencing damage by wintering elk.Work with private and federal agencies to maintain and protect critical and existing winter range from future losses. UTAH MOOSE STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN C. Habitat - The primary limiting factor for moose in Utah and across their range is the availability of suitable habitat. - Moose have done well in drier habitats in northern Utah which are dominated by mountain mahogany, Gambel oak, serviceberry, quaking aspen, and burned over coniferous forests A. Habitat Degradation or Loss. - The single biggest influence on moose populations in Utah is the quantity and quality of available habitat. Habitat can be degraded, fragmented, or lost to a variety of causes including human development and plant succession B. Habitat Management Goal: Assure sufficient habitat is available to sustain healthy and productive moose populations. Strategies -- A,D,E Logan Ranger District Travel Management Plan implementation; Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan; Forestwide Goal 3-Biodiversity & Viability Provide for sustained diversity of species at the genetic, populations, community and ecosystem levels. Maintain communities within their historic range of variation that sustains habitats for viable populations of species. Restore or maintain hydrologic functions. Reduce potential for uncharacteristic high-intensity wildfires, and insect epidemics. 3m. Provide for connectivity of continuous large patches of forested habitat for interior forest-dependent and wide-ranging species (such as lynx, wolverine and migratory birds). 3o. Provide adequate habitat components for sustainable big game populations coordinated with State wildlife management agencies, private lands and other resource needs and priorities. 3s. Greatly reduce known infestations of noxious weeds and rigorously prevent their introduction and/or spread. Guidelines for Biodiversity and Viability: (G26) Protect key big game calving, fawning and lambing habitat and provide security in summer concentration areas. Greater Sage-grouse ROD, Greater sage-grouse Utah Plan Amendment (FS 2015). GRSG-GRSGH-GL-032-(UT) In priority and general habitat management areas, sagebrush focal areas, and Anthro Mountain, native plant species should be used when possible to maintain, restore, or enhance desired conditions (Table GRSG-GEN-DC3) in Utah. (Amendment #13, September 2015) GRSG-RT-GL-071-Guideline (UT);GRSG-RT-GL-076-Guideline (WY) In priority and general GRSG habitat management areas, sagebrush focal areas, and Anthro Mountain, when decommissioning roads and unauthorized routes, restoration activity should be designed to move habitat towards desired conditions. (Amendment #13 September 16, 2015). State of Utah's new Greater Sage-Grouse Management Plan (2009) --M2 Maintain/protect large contiguous intact sagebrush communities that contain seasonal habitat needs of sage-grouse populations within the state. Logan Ranger District Travel Management Plan implementation; Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan; Forestwide Goal 3-Biodiversity & Viability Provide for sustained diversity of species at the genetic, populations, community and ecosystem levels. Maintain communities within their historic range of variation that sustains habitats for viable populations of species. Restore or maintain hydrologic functions. Reduce potential for uncharacteristic high-intensity wildfires, and insect epidemics. 3m. Provide for connectivity of continuous large patches of forested habitat for interior forest-dependent and wide-ranging species (such as lynx, wolverine and migratory birds). 3o. Provide adequate habitat components for sustainable big game populations coordinated with State wildlife management agencies, private lands and other resource needs and priorities. 3s. Greatly reduce known infestations of noxious weeds and rigorously prevent their introduction and/or spread. Forestwide Goal 5-Road/Trail and Access Management Provide a road and trail system that is safe, responsive to public and agency needs and desires, affordable and efficiently managed. Provide an access system that minimizes negative ecological effects and is in balance with available funding. Focus on achieving an integrated transportation system that serves multiple functions and is consistent with desired future conditions for a given area. 5d. Manage trails to provide desired recreation opportunities for recreation users and to meet Forest Service standards. Guidelines for Biodiversity and Viability: (G26) Protect key big game calving, fawning and lambing habitat and provide security in summer concentration areas. Greater Sage-grouse ROD, Greater sage-grouse Utah Plan Amendment (FS 2015). GRSG-GRSGH-GL-032-(UT) In priority and general habitat management areas, sagebrush focal areas, and Anthro Mountain, native plant species should be used when possible to maintain, restore, or enhance desired conditions (Table GRSG-GEN-DC3) in Utah. (Amendment #13, September 2015) GRSG-RT-GL-071-Guideline (UT);GRSG-RT-GL-076-Guideline (WY) In priority and general GRSG habitat management areas, sagebrush focal areas, and Anthro Mountain, when decommissioning roads and unauthorized routes, restoration activity should be designed to move habitat towards desired conditions. (Amendment #13 September 16, 2015). State of Utah's new Greater Sage-Grouse Management Plan (2009) --M2 Maintain/protect large contiguous intact sagebrush communities that contain seasonal habitat needs of sage-grouse populations within the state. Several of the main priorities outlined in the Utah Forest Action Plan are applicable to this project 1) Conserve and manage working forest landscapes for multilple values and uses 2) Protect forests from threats 3) Enhance public benefits from trees and forests. This project is a critical component to the Forest Stewardship Plan developed in 2015 for the private lands in this project that specifically outlines several related management objectives: 1) Enhance and maintain forest health by addressing the mountain pine beetle infestation in lodgepole pine stands. 2) Maintain, utilize, and increase rangeland production on the property for long-term, sustained livestock grazing. 3) Manage current forested areas to improve and maximize health in addition to minimizing the threats of wildfire and infestation. 4) Improve habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife that are found in the area.
Fire / Fuels:
The thinning treatments will significantly reduce stand density. By reducing the number and arrangement of trees in the precommercial stands, this will reduce the potential for a ground fire to move into the canopy and cause a high severity wildfire. The treated material will be either piled and burned or masticated in order to rearrange/ remove fuel loading from the stands.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Forests generally have very low erosion rates unless they are disturbed in a manner that exposes bare soil to the erosive energy of water and wind. Evidence of soil erosion due to management activities is minimal in the project area. Soil erosion rates would remain unchanged from existing conditions in the short term. Thinning or regeneration treatments with ground-based equipment during operations may add to the total detrimental condition across an activity area (different locations within an activity area). Mastication equipment typically is light on the land and does not produce the same disturbance to soils as harvest equipment. Ruts and compaction of soil may occur if operations occur while soils are wet. Thinning and regeneration treatments would not impact the soil resources where work is accomplished with hand tools. Use Best Management Practices and Soil and Water Conservation Practices during project level assessment and implementation to ensure maintenance of soil productivity, minimization of sediment discharge into streams, lakes and wetlands. Water quantity may increase with a reduction on younger trees competing for available ground water. This has been proven in other thinning treatments of both oak and juniper species. Water quality and quantity will be improved in this area by ensuring these stands remains a productive and viable forest stands. By removing a large portion of the conifers, water quantity will be temporarily increased by the reduction of trees and by the increased amount of snow that will fall directly to the surface into a partially shaded canopy. Less snow will be captured in the canopy of the conifers and sublimated rather than soaking into the groundwater.
Compliance:
The Red Ryder Vegetation Management Project has signed NEPA dated 6/25/2018 by UWC Forest Supervisor. All archaeological and resource specialists have reviewed the project with no further analysis required.
Methods:
Precommercial thinning will remove trees in sapling and young stands to reduce stocking and concentrate growth on the more desirable trees. This is a non-commercial treatment. Approximately 1,002 acres of previously treated stands will be thinned to moderate stocking levels (approximately 170-300 trees per acre). These stands are predominately lodgepole pine which is highly prone to stagnation. This thinning would release the residual trees in these stands, preventing stagnation and increasing individual tree growth rates, speeding the stands' progression to mid/mature structural conditions.
Monitoring:
Extensive pre-planning monitoring was collected through "common stand exams". This data was used to determine the best treatment for each stand. While implementation occurs, close contract/project monitoring will occur to assure the treatments are meeting stated objectives. Years following treatment post monitoring will occur along with additional common stand exams to determine the need and appropriate next treatment for the stand, this may occur in 10-20 years post. At this time the stand will be harvested/sold. The private lands included in this project are part of an ongoing monitoring strategy to continually look for new weed infestations, erosion, and insect and disease outbreaks. FFSL will accompany the landowner on a yearly basis to assess the treatment and determine effectiveness in regards to insect/disease resistance, subalpine fir encroachment, and lodgepole growth response to the treatment. Qualitative monitoring will be done to establish photo points and a baseline inventory has already been established for this stand. The private landowner regularly works with the NRCS to develop and implement grazing improvement strategies and make changes to the grazing plan including the proposed project.
Partners:
This project will encompass USFS, State, and private lands in close vicinity and often crossing property lines. The USFS consulted with and partnered with SITLA while planning the Red Ryder Vegetation Management Project to include both ownerships as part of the larger scale prescribed fire treatment. Prior vegetative treatments conducted on SITLA ground will further benefit in terms of a reduction in fuels and improved wildlife habitat.
Future Management:
The Red Ryder project area will continue to be managed for multiple use. The project area will see additional treatments over the next 1-7+years. A recently sold 3,208 acre timber sale will take place over the next 1-5 years with the saw logs going to a local sawmill. Following timber harvest an 8,000 acre prescribed fire is planned to treat conifer encroached aspen stands providing for improved wildlife habitat and a more resilient forest stand across SITLA and near the WUI boundaries. Preventative weed treatments are also planned following treatments or as needed. Additionally cattle grazing will continue along with opportunities for hunting, and other recreation use. The private landowner is part of the Forest Stewardship program with the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands in addition to applying for a Forest Legacy easement on the property. Grazing will not need to be reduced on the property given the low utilization of the property. The landowner has agreed to monitor and maintain the stands by continually removing new subalpine fir while they are still small and manageable. The landowner will include this area in their regular monitoring and maintenance schedule to check for weeds or other forest health issues such as insects and diseases and will work with FFSL when necessary to deal with maintenance issues. The landowner has a grazing management plan with the NRCS designed to benefit livestock and wildlife that is regularly monitored and updated.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Three allotments are within the project area. The North Rich Allotment (a cattle allotment) is in the northern portion of the project area. The Bug Lake Allotment and the North Randolph Allotment (sheep and cattle allotment, respectively) are within the southern portion of the project area. The reduction in canopy cover and reduced completion amongst smaller saplings will increase forage for livestock grazing. When the canopy opens, previously unavailable areas to forage will be increased due to the increase of light and nutrients to the forest floor. The private lands have been moderately grazed by the landowner's family for more than 60 years. It is part of a much larger Forest Service allotment and heavily influenced by Forest Service regulations. Approximately 6,000 sheep and occasional cattle graze through the property including the treatment area. This project will temporarily improve grazing in the area by removing the subalpine fir and thinning the lodgepole, which are currently creating a closed canopy with little forage. Increased light and moisture availability will improve grazing for livestock with increased forage. Currently, the stands are so dense that they are rarely used for grazing and there is little forage available. The private landowner regularly works with the NRCS to develop and implement grazing improvement strategies and make changes to their conservation plan. This project will provide substantial sustainable uses in addition to grazing. All of these stands are being precommercially thinned with the purpose of improving the stand for future timber harvests. Thinning will significantly increase the value and health of each stand. Many of these precommercially thinned stands will yield posts and poles, firewood, furniture, and other small wood opportunities.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$732,600.00 $8,000.00 $740,600.00 $65,000.00 $805,600.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
NEPA Red Ryder NEPA analysis and decision $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2019
Contractual Services Project inspection $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2020
Contractual Services Up to $1200/acre cut and pile. May be less or more depending on bids; recent bids have been $700-$1400/ acre. $730,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) Supervision and project implementation from FFSL and SITLA employees. $0.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Private landowner assistance with cleanup and project work. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2020
Archaeological Clearance Arch clearance for any SITLA and private lands that aren't already cleared. $2,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$701,671.82 $8,000.00 $709,671.82 $65,000.00 $774,671.82
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
DNR Watershed U004 $243,900.19 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands (FFSL) FFSL Personnel Services $0.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2020
Utah Trust Lands Administration (TLA) SITLA personnel services. $0.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) USFS NEPA and project inspection $0.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 2020
Private $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2020
Internal Conservation Permit C013 ICP Moose $8,322.57 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Habitat Council Account QHCR $19,071.82 $0.00 $0.00 2021
USFS-WRI A056 $80,734.13 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Internal Conservation Permit C011 ICP Elk $87,303.03 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Internal Conservation Permit C013 ICP Moose $26,677.43 $0.00 $0.00 2021
DNR Watershed U004 $41,275.22 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Internal Conservation Permit C011 ICP Elk $27,196.97 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Habitat Council Account QHCR $5,928.18 $0.00 $0.00 2020
UWRI-Pre-Suppression Fund U006 $98,516.78 $0.00 $0.00 2020
USFS-WRI A056 $25,165.87 $0.00 $0.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) A021 $37,579.63 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bobcat
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Moose R3
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Ruffed Grouse R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Snowshoe Hare R4
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Dusky Grouse R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Project Comments
Comment 02/15/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Can you help me understand how you're working in sagebrush, or helping sage-grouse? I'm looking at a lodgepole PCT, right?
Comment 02/18/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeff Sanocki
Jimi, Thanks for your comment. You are correct, this project will treat primarily lodgepole stands. However 90% of these stands do lie within the sage grouse layer provided by the WRI mapping tool on the website. Reducing the ladder fuels and interconnected crowns of these younger trees, will benefit the adjacent sagebrush communities by limiting the risk of high severity wildfire moving through causing total loss to the sagebrush habitat.
Comment 08/24/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 09/14/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please fill out the Completion Form ASAP. Completion reports were due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 3 Commenter: Monson Shaver
I can send these acres on private and SITLA to contract 85 acres private, 39 acres SITLA for $21/acre = $2,604 or add the USFS to the contract if requested.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 3 Commenter: Jeff Sanocki
Monson, Thanks for your comment. Archaeological clearance have already been conducted on the USFS lands. This proposal does already include a request of $10,000 to fund archaeological clearance on the state and private lands. FFSL will coordinate who conducts the clearances on those land ownerships.
Completion
Start Date:
10/10/2019
End Date:
06/30/2022
FY Implemented:
2022
Final Methods:
Both a Lop and Scatter and a Cut/Pile method were used to reduce tree density in the Red Ryder pre-commercial thinning project. The original bid came in below the funded amount, so an additional 281 acres were piled under this agreement. * Lop and Scatter contract- 471 acres, 21 separate units ranging in size from 5-91 acres. Awarded to 3B's- completed on 7/10/2020. * Masticate or Cut/Pile- 156 acres, 13 separate units ranging in size from 1-25 acres. Awarded to Summit-completed on 6/24/2020. * Cut and Pile- 311 acres, 30 separate units ranging in size from 3-40 acres. Awarded to 3B's- completed on 8/1/2020. * Pile- 281 acres, 9 separate units ranging in size from 4-90 acres. Awarded to 3B's- completed on 8/1/2020. * Machine Cut and Pile - 94 acres, 2 units. Awarded to Sargent Specialties - completed on 11/23/2020
Project Narrative:
The lop and scatter contract started in Fall 2019 along the westside of the Sinks road just north of the Temple Canyon road and finished up in July of 2020 with only the usual issue of getting the contractor to keep the slash height low. The Cut and Pile contract began in November 2019, the piles were nicely done however the specs made the scope of work a little hard to follow with the amount of slash to be piled. This was adjusted to allow for the piles to be created in the openings. The contract for the Mastication or Cut/Pile began early Spring of 2020 using a piling method and was completed by June, no issues. The extra Pile contract was started and completed in July 2020 in the units with excess slash, to be burned at a later date. The machine cut and pile began in August 2020 and finished in November 2020 with no issues. Piles were burned in 2021 and will continue to be burned through 2022.
Future Management:
Piles will be burned when conditions allow on 583 acres, beginning in 2021. There is a continuing timber harvest in the surrounding area through 2024. Post monitoring will occur along with additional common stand exams and photopoints to determine the need and appropriate next treatment for the stand. Once all piles are burned and timber harvest is complete, a prescribed fire will occur on 10,786 acres in the area. The stand will be harvested/sold at sometime in the future approximately 10-20 years.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
7868 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
Project Map
Project Map