South Slope Vegetation Restoration Phase 2
Project ID: 4856
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 965
Project Manager: Garry Brown
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Ashley National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
This implementation phase will include drill seeding 265 acres of mesic meadows in the Mosby Mountain area that was sprayed with herbicide in October 2018 (see WRI Project ID 4545). An additional 824 acres are proposed to be broadcast seeded to improve native vegetation in the same area.
Location:
T2N R1E Sections 16, 17, 20, 21 Uintah Meridian T3S R18E Sections 10-15 Salt Lake Meridian Lower elevations (7,000-8,300 ft.) between Whiterocks Canyon and Mosby Canyon.
Project Need
Need For Project:
In 2018 a herbicide treatment (WRI Project ID 4545) was completed as well as cultural clearances associated with NEPA. SHPO concurrence is complete and the NEPA decision will be signed by March 15. This project is needed to follow up with the herbicide treatment by seeding areas vulnerable to cheatgrass invasion. To take advantage of the herbicide treatment implementation needs to occur fall of 2019.
Objectives:
The objective is to take an aggressive, proactive role to minimize or reduce the spread of cheatgrass to restore, or at least maintain, the current range condition and critical habitat by establishing competitive, perennial species. Additional objectives include a greater fire return interval, an increase in soil stability, an increase in forage for livestock and wildlife, and maintenance of species diversity. It is anticipated that this project will be a test for treatment success to assist in future vegetation management projects.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If seed is not established within the chemically treated areas, cheatgrass is likely to re-establish the open niches and possibly completely convert to cheatgrass in the near future. If left untreated, our monitoring shows that disturbances, especially drought, may cause the vegetation composition to cross the threshold from vegetation dominated by perennial grass with some infestations of cheatgrass, to a landscape dominated by cheatgrass and other annual weeds. A conversion to an annual dominated understory also threatens the current grazing management of the Mosby Mountain Allotment by potentially reducing the grazing season, cattle numbers and season of use flexibility because of the lack of perennial vegetation. Historically, the project area was not managed appropriately and when combined with wildfire, this area has become susceptible for invasion. Grazing practices are currently being adapted to improve conditions (see Sustainable Uses section below).
Relation To Management Plan:
This proposal is in compliance with the Ashley National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan of 1986, as well as the Greater Sage Grouse Amendment to the Forest Plan. The proposal is also in alignment with the directions and objectives of the Range Management Handbook, the Mosby Mountain Allotment Management Plan and the Ashley National Forest Noxious Weed Management Plan. The proposed project is within crucial mule deer habitat and is identified in the UDWR Mule Deer Management Plan as a priority area for vegetation restoration projects (see also Habitat Objectives #2 b, d). This proposal addresses issues regarding habitat loss, invasive species and improper livestock grazing as outlined in the Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-Grouse in Utah (2013). This plan also addresses improving quality forage and important winter habitat for elk in the Mosby Mountain area (see Habitat Objective 1 b, c and Habitat Objective 2 c in the UDWR Elk Management Plan). This proposal supports fire management, noxious weed, riparian/wetlands and livestock/grazing objectives and policies in the 2017 Uintah County plan. Some of these objectives include: 17.4.1 "Reduce or eliminate noxious weed infestations and minimize the establishment of new weed species across jurisdictional boundaries using adaptive management and integrated weed management approaches." 15.4.3 "Manage lands to maintain or increase forage allocation for livestock grazing. Require annual checking and verification that lands are still up to standard." 20.4.11 "Modify grazing use to avoid overgrazing if appropriate." By reducing cheatgrass composition and improving the perennial plant composition this proposal also is supported by the 2018 State of Utah Resource Management Plan (RMP). The plans noxious weed objectives on pages 171-172 stress to "increase emphasis on prevention as a strategy to manage noxious weeds in the state." And that "post-treatment, areas that have been invaded by noxious weeds must be revegetated and rehabilitated. The goal after treatment is to return the area to a desirable species composition if possible. As native vegetation is reestablished, the risk of future invasions of noxious weeds decreases." Livestock objectives in the RMP also suggests to "improve vegetative health on public and private lands through range improvements, prescribed fire, vegetation treatments, and active management of invasive plants and noxious weeds."
Fire / Fuels:
The primary focus of Secretarial Order 3336, signed in 2015 in response to the USFWS status review, was to reduce threats to greater sage-grouse habitat by reducing the frequency and severity of rangeland fire. The objective is to create a situation where fire frequency is decreased to a point where sagebrush and perennial vegetation can get established, maintain habitat, cover and forage and resist the infestation of cheatgrass. The fire wise seed mix proposed is designed to out compete cheatgrass, provide habitat, cover and forage that remains greener longer in an attempt to break the cycle of conversion seen throughout the West.
Water Quality/Quantity:
With the establishment of perennial vegetation, water quality is expected to increase as soil is stabilized, infiltration increases and run-off is decreased. Water quantity is expected to increase in meadows as water is held by perennial vegetation. As part of this project, grazing practices have been adapted to improve rangeland conditions and allow for maintenance and recovery of key perennial species. As the project is implemented, grazing will continue to be adapted based on monitoring, to maintain the treatment, thus indirectly improving the overall water quality and quantity long-term. The Lyman Springs Pasture will be rested for at least the 2020 grazing season, to allow the seeding to become established. This will be documented in the Annual Operating Instructions. This project falls within the Tridell-LaPoint municipal watershed.
Compliance:
The NEPA process is near completion and waiting for a Decision to be signed once SHPO concurrence is complete. A draft report from the cultural clearance WRI contract has been submitted to the Forest Service for review. Once the final report is submitted and SHPO concurrence is complete, the decision memo can be signed and the project can be implemented. Expected decision is March 2019.
Methods:
1. Drill seed 265 acres with rangeland drill in semi-wet to mesic meadows and roadside. 177 acres of this drill seeding will be contracted using a 10 ft rangeland drill. 88 acres will be reserved to be completed by the Forest Service (permittee or other in kind method) using a smaller drill in less accessible areas. 2. Broadcast 824 acres with either fixed wing or helicopter in rocky terrain to improve upland, perennial vegetation.
Monitoring:
Approximately 230 permanent study plots are established within the project area, including two wildlife/cattle exclosures. Data, including repeat photography, will be collected immediately before and after treatments. The project will be monitored for three years intensively, and long-term monitoring will continue following the Ashley National Forest protocol. Photos and data will be input into the WRI completion report and stored at the Ashley National Forest.
Partners:
WRI has funded the first stage of this project including herbicide treatment and cultural clearances to complete NEPA (WRI Project ID 4545). This funding has expedited the NEPA process and supported the Forest Service with funding otherwise not available. Partners and funding associated with this first grant included: RMEF, Safari Club, SFW, Utah Bowman's Assoc., USFS, MDF, DNR watershed. As part of this project, several water systems and other range improvements are currently being reconstructed by the permittee with help from the Utah Grazing Improvement Program and NRCS. The following partners have been consulted for planning and coordination purposes. They have added valuable input and will continue to shape the details of the project. -Forest Service resource staff and NEPA ID Team including Don Jaques, Ryan Mower, Nate Shinkle, Jeff Rust, Allen Huber, Dustin Bambrough -Utah Grazing Improvement Program-Terrell Thayne (assisted with UGIP grants on the Mosby Mountain Allotment and helped with drill seeding planning). -NRCS-Mark Ewell (planning and help with NRCS grant) -Pheasants Forever/NRCS-Charlie Holtz (worked with the permittee to develop water and helped fund 5-year NRCS grant to replace several water systems) -Grazing Permittee Nelson Farms, Inc.-Kent Nelson -Utah Division of Wildlife-Miles Hanberg, Tory Mathis (Planning, Mapping) -Utah State University-Eric Thacker (Consulted for seeding success and methods) -BIA-Gary Dean (discussed tribal lands that could possibly be treated adjacent to the Forest) This project occurs only on U.S. Forest Service administered land.
Future Management:
The Forest Service is committed to improving rangeland and this project is a high priority. Grazing management has been adapted to assist in the maintenance and, hopefully, improvement of the rangeland. Cattle numbers have been reduced, grazing rotation has been changed and reconstruction of water projects have been ongoing for the last few years in an attempt to maintain the perennial vegetation. Nevertheless, cheatgrass will continue to spread now that it has been established and the landscape is in need of drastic, aggressive treatment. It is anticipated that this project will be a test for treatment success to assist in future vegetation management projects. Additional seeding or other treatment may be necessary if this phase does not meeting desired conditions based on the monitoring results.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
It is anticipated that vegetation rehabilitation will allow more flexibility in the grazing season of use, numbers and other management practices. Treatment will also provide improved cover, habitat and forage for wildlife and livestock. Improved habitat will potentially increase deer and elk in the area increasing positive hunting experiences as well as opportunities for viewing wildlife for campers and those recreating in the area.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$125,310.00 $0.00 $125,310.00 $14,080.00 $139,390.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Drill Seed Contract 177 acres using DWR rangeland drill (estimated $110/acre). $19,470.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
NEPA Forest Service completed NEPA $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 2020
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Forest Service Vegetation Monitoring-Forest Service FY 2019 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2020
Contractual Services Aerial broadcast seeding services for 824 acres (estimated $35 acre). $28,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Seed (GBRC) Seed for 265 acres of drill seeding $17,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Seed (GBRC) Seed for 824 acres for broadcast seeding. $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) Drill 88 acres to be completed by Forest Service using small DWR drill. Estimated $35/acre. $0.00 $0.00 $3,080.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$125,310.00 $0.00 $125,310.00 $14,080.00 $139,390.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) Forest Service completed NEPA. $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) Forest Service monitoring for FY 2019. $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2020
Federal Aid (PR) P651 $68,310.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
USFS-WRI A056 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) S025 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Safari Club International S026 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Utah Archery Association S052 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
MDF Expo Permit ($1.50) S053 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) Drill 88 acres to be completed by Forest Service using small DWR drill. Estimated $35/acre. $0.00 $0.00 $3,080.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Medium
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Habitats
Habitat
Mountain Meadow
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Very High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/30/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
It looks like you have one seed mix for the total project. Could you please split your seed mix into two -- one for the drill seeding and the other for the aerial seeding? That will help me better understand what you are planning to do and will better allow the GBRC to help you get what you need.
Comment 01/30/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
Yes. I updated the acres from the maps we fixed the other day and split the spreadsheet into drill and broadcast. I will also work on getting a quote to make sure my price is correct.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
The two seed mixes look identical, other than the acreage. Is this correct? Does this mean that the areas that receive both drill and broadcast will receive twice as much seed as the other areas?
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
Yes you are correct. I recognized that the seed mix should not be the same. I adjusted them and sent it to the seed company for a new estimate a few weeks ago hoping to have it back to adjust the prices but they have not responded yet. I will go ahead and update the adjustments. Yes the drill/broadcast acres (275) will get a double layer of seed. I don't know a better way to do it unless the pilot can turn it off accurate enough to avoid the meadows. Any suggestions?
Comment 01/30/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
You might consider adding State and County RMP's to your list of relevant management plans. It might help improve the score this project receives during the ranking process.
Comment 01/30/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
Thanks. I added them to the Related to Resource Plans section.
Comment 02/13/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Brian Maxfield
Project will enhance this area for sage-grouse. GPS transmitter data has shown the area this project is located is used as nesting and brood rearing habitat. Enhancement of the meadows will benefit the grouse using the area.
Comment 02/19/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
I split out 88 drill seed acres that the Forest Service will accomplish using a smaller drill in areas difficult for a contractor to get to. I also updated the acres, map and finances.
Comment 04/03/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
GBRC Comment: Sorry these comments are so late. Looking at the drill mix for these productive meadow locations I wonder if it might be an opportunity to reduce or remove crested wg in the mix and use other grasses that might maintain higher diversity. A couple questions. The precip model I'm looking at is showing these sites to be around 20" annual. Is that right? Also, how heavily grazed are these meadow sites? If precip is lower and there is heavy use, it might be wise to leave the crested. If precip is correct (at around 20"), use is not to high, and the herbicide treatment had good control of the cheatgrass, you might consider adding some things like Basin wildrye, mountain brome, muttongrass, and letterman needlegrass (if we can get it). I think for the rockier upland broadcast I would stick with the crested in the mix. As FYI, our prices our typically lower than going directly to a seed company because we buy in bulk from multiple vendors. The workbook you used is slightly out of date (I didn't get it updated until January), so costs have likely gone up slightly. Prices will change after our seed buy in the summer, so these are always estimates.
Comment 04/08/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
I think 20 inch precip is correct. The area has in the past been heavily grazed. We are working on a better system with improved water systems. The area is also one of the heaviest area used by deer, elk and rabbits. Not sure how the herbicide treatment worked yet. I will go up when the snow is gone. I agree keeping crested in the upland mix and would also keep some in the meadows. The meadows range from semi-wet to dry and are concentration areas for cattle because they are flat. We can definitely update the seed workbook if I can get a new one. Thanks for the help.
Comment 04/08/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
You can download a new seed template on the seed tab of the project (updated January 2019). Even without the removal of crested, I would suggest diversifying the meadow mix with some of the suggested species from the previous comment, if possible. We're glad to help however we can. Thanks.
Comment 08/25/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 09/02/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Garry - It looks like you have most of your completion report done but it was never finalized so I was uncertain if you were actually completed with your report. I did go ahead and review the report and map features. On your map you show a broadcast seeding over a large area but it is not mentioned in the report. Please make sure your map matches the methods you talk about in your report. When you have completed that, please go back to the Completion Form and finalize your report again so I know that it has been completed. Thanks.
Comment 09/02/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Garry Brown
Sorry. I thought for sure I submitted that a few weeks ago when Tory helped me with the map. Yes I forgot to mention the broadcast seeding in the completion form. I have made those changes, added some more photos and finalized it.
Comment 09/09/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
One more follow up question. Were the drill seeded polygons within the broadcast area seeded aerially as well? I am assuming so. If that is that is the case will you go into those 2 features and add that action to the drill seeding? To do that you will just select the feature you want to add an action to and then click on the Modify Feature button. From there you and select a second action for that feature. Thanks.
Comment 09/29/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Garry Brown
Alison. Thanks for catching that. I have been on a fire and have not had time to follow up. The changes have been made.
Completion
Start Date:
10/01/2019
End Date:
06/18/2020
FY Implemented:
2020
Final Methods:
A total of 219 acres of the planned 275 were drill seeded by the contractor and the Forest Service. Some areas were too steep and rocky for access. The contractor used a large range drill and the Forest Service used the 6-8 foot baby drill pulled behind a UTV. The contractor did a good job covering most of the areas described. He did not come prepared with the GIS layers loaded on a GPS which hindered his ability to cover the exact polygons. The FS stayed on site and helped the contractor navigate. The 824 acres of broadcast seeding was completed as planned in October of 2019.
Project Narrative:
The South Slope Vegetation Rehabilitation Project was proposed after seeing an increase in cheatgrass in the lower areas of Mosby Mountain. A combination of an improved grazing system, reduced numbers of cows, herbicide, seeding and grazing rest has already shown improvements. Monitoring shows that the herbicide treatment in Phase 1 of this project was very successful. Seedlings from the drill seeding where seen in a few drill rows. Numerous seedlings of grasses and sagebrush where observed throughout the area but it was not known if they were a result of the drill or broadcast seeding.
Future Management:
Some cheatgrass sites were missed with herbicide in 2018. The Forest Service will follow up with spot spraying and seeding as needed. The Lyman Spring Pasture will be rested in 2020 and during the growing season of 2021. The Forest Service will also evaluate if there are any other areas that can be seeded that where missed due to steep slopes and rocks. Monitoring will continue to determine the effectiveness of the drill and broadcast seeding.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
9485 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
9486 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
9486 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Drill (rangeland)
9487 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Drill (rangeland)
9488 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
9488 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Drill (rangeland)
Project Map
Project Map