Quichapa Lake Hydrology and Vegetation Enhancement (Phase 1)
Project ID: 4859
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: 327
Project Manager: Dustin Schaible
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Quichapa Lake is a federally designated lacustrine wetland that is periodically inundated, providing crucial stopover habitat for migratory birds as well as upland habitat that supports multiple game species. To improve wetland function and increase habitat effectiveness, this project will focus on removal of Tamarix spp. and replacing it with desirable vegetation. Additionally, this project will focus on diversifying upland vegetation to promote hunting and recreational opportunities.
Location:
Quichapa Lake is situated just south of Utah State Highway 56 in the southern portion of Cedar Valley in Iron County, Utah.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Quichapa Lake sits approximately 6 miles west of Cedar City and consists of BLM, SITLA, and private lands. The area is a USFWS and National Wetland Inventory designated lacustrine wetland that serves as an important migratory bird stopover and provides general wildlife habitat that promotes unique recreational opportunities for wildlife hunting and viewing in southern Utah. Since this area is one of the only federally owned wetlands in close proximity to Cedar City and St George, this unique system attracts hundreds of waterfowl and upland game hunters as well as recreational enthusiasts interested in bird viewing, kayaking, etc. Additionally, the BLM has completed NEPA to improve wildlife habitat and cooperate with Central Iron County Water Conservancy District (CIWCD) in a groundwater recharge project on the northern portion of the wetland area. Tamarisk has invaded over 300 acres within the flood plains and adjacent uplands. The upland areas mainly consist of older age class sagebrush and greasewood. In an effort to improve wildlife habitat and hydrologic conditions, this project will focus on tamarisk removal while simultaneously treating the upland vegetation to promote a variety of upland game species. As tamarisk is removed, future phases of this project will focus on planting and expanding desired hydric vegetation. The primary reasons for controlling non-native tamarisk trees are to increase water yield, improve wildlife habitat, restore native vegetation, and prevent wildfire that could become a hazard as the trees mature and spread further. By restoring this project area with desired wetland vegetation, the project will also improve water quantity and quality in this ecosystem aiding in the CIWCD recharge efforts and providing more water availability for wildlife habitat. In addressing specific threats to wildlife, the project aims to mitigate periods of drought and/or low water availability by improving hydrologic condition through tamarisk removal, water inundation management, and creation of deeper pools in an effort to retain water longer. This will benefit high value waterfowl that are commonly found on Quichapa when water is available including (but not limited to) the following species; Giant Canada Geese, mallards, gadwall, and cinnamon teal. Other important aquatic birds can be found on Quichapa that would benefit from improved water management efforts including American Pelican and White-faced Ibis which have been observed in the area when inundated. While observations are more uncommon but documented at Quichapa, the increase in monitoring and recreational bird viewing opportunities that would result from this project will ideally address data gap threats associated with American Pelicans. Mammals that would benefit from improvements in water management at Quichapa include cottontail rabbits which are commonly found and hunted on BLM lands in the project area. Mule deer have been observed in dry periods traveling from the Vandenburg area to use the wetland habitat. Improvements in water distribution and availability as well as invasive species management may further attract deer and mitigate private lands issues. Upland game bird habitat that this project aims to improve is focused on pheasants and morning doves. Pheasants have been released by UDWR for hunting and has been met with extreme popularity. This project will address pheasant needs by providing habitat that mitigates droughts as well as the reduction of pheasant numbers in other areas of southern Utah where improvements in irrigation has reduced habitat. Additionally, morning doves are commonly found in the area, particularly on private lands with water. This project will alleviate water availability and distribution and attract this upland game bird to public lands to make them available for hunting and viewing. Golden eagles and bald eagles are commonly found hunting the area during periods of inundation. This project will address invasive plant species threats for both of these eagles and improve prey species richness and abundance through improved habitat conditions.
Objectives:
This project is focused on making Quichapa a little bit better than just okay. The overall management objective of this parcel of BLM will be to support recreational hunting and wildlife viewing opportunities while improving invaluable wetland habitat in southern Utah. There are 4 main components to the proposed restoration efforts including tamarisk management, wetland management, upland vegetation management, and recreation management. These will be addressed in multiple phases (see attached document for estimated phases and associated costs). Tamarisk Management: Remove tamarisk and replace/promote desirable hydric wetland vegetation to: - improve migratory bird and semi-aquatic wildlife habitat, - reduce risk of wildfire, - improve the hydrologic conditions for water quality in support of Iron County's groundwater recharge project and increase duration of inundation for wildlife habitat Wetland Management Install culvert control system to regulate inundation to: - Increase tamarisk removal effectiveness by controlling soil moisture - Allow for dredging to increase wetland depth and create islands for waterfowl - Improve submergent vegetation for waterfowl forage Upland Vegetation Management Increase diversity of upland vegetative community for a variety of game species to: -Support various life cycles and uses of morning doves, cottontail rabbits, pheasants, and quail to increase recreational opportunities. Recreation Management - install property boundary signs - seek opportunities for parking management through installation of signs and parking lot - promote hunting and viewing events
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Risks if treatment were not to occur would be a loss of wetland habitat from further establishment and spread of nonnative woody invasive vegetation and continued loss of water resources as tamarisk spreads further into the uplands, replacing xeric vegetation such as greasewood shrublands and mixed salt desert scrub. "Saltcedar initiates negative changes in the ecosystem. The deep roots combined with salt glands on leaves account for the redistribution of salts form deep soil profiles to the soil surface. The excessive salt deposits on the surface inhibit the growth and germination of less salt tolerant native species leading to a reduction in plant and animal diversity. Although some wildlife species successfully survive in saltcedar-dominated areas, most species are negatively affected by displacement of native plant species..." USU Cooperative Extension 2006, Saltcedar (Agweeds2006.01) Risks also included due to the spread and increase of Tamarisk would be reduction of available water for recharge and holding ponds that are Right of ways held by CICWD with the Cedar City BLM Office and possible increase in fire due to Tamarisk's fire behavior (see below in Fire/Fuels). Social risks exist in the public's demand for more public lands capable of sustaining huntable wildlife such as pheasants, morning doves, and waterfowl. UDWR has released pheasants in the area which has generated substantial public participation (approximately 50-100 hunters on opening day for both waterfowl and pheasants). Improvements of the upland habitat available on one of the only public wetlands in southern Utah will contribute to state and federal mandates to provide hunting and wildlife viewing opportunities. Furthermore, economic contributions from hunting and wildlife viewing have been well documented and will continue to benefit local economies.
Relation To Management Plan:
BLM's Cedar, Beaver, Garfield, Antimony Resource Managmenent Plan by Soil, Water and Air Objective 1 which states that "the BLM should avoid the deterioration of or improve watershed condition on federal land." UDWR's Wildlife Action Plan, by (1) meeting the objective to reduce invasive plant species through conservation actions 2.2.2, 2.2.3, and 2.2.4 (survey, eradicate, and contain established populations of invasive plant species); and (2) conservation actions 2.2.5 and 2.2.7 by cutting and chemically treating the tamarisk; and, (3) conservation action 2.3.15, by conducting riparian vegetation treatments to restore characteristic riparian vegetation, and reduce uncharacteristic fuel types and loading. Iron County Cooperative Weed Management Area Agreement Utah's Noxious Weed Act (R68-9), by removing/containing a new or expanding population of tamarisk, which is a Class 3 noxious weed. Utah Partners in Flight (UPIF) Bird Conservation Plan" by supporting activities that prevent invasions of exotic species and restore priority habitat. The Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program Strategic Plan" by addressing specific habitat concerns (invasive species) in a priority habitat type (wetland). Under the Strategic Goals and Objectives of the "Utah Strategic Tamarisk Management Plan", by meeting goal 1, which states, "Protect the State's natural, agricultural, and ranching resources including water quality and quantity, native plant communities, and wildlife habitat from the impacts of tamarisk through early detection, control, and restoration efforts." Iron County Resource Management Plan identifies Quichapa as a source for runoff water being available for wildlife.
Fire / Fuels:
Although at this time, the infestation of Tamarisk within the ShurtzCanyon-Quichapa Lake hydrographic unit is not tall large mature stands the potential, if left uncontrolled, could have hazardous effects in regard to fire, especially considering the urban setting that has developed and is further developing within the watershed. "...Salt cedar is adapted to fire and recovers more quickly than native riparian species after a burn because of its ability to vigorously resprout from the crown. Historic fire records from the lower Colorado River floodplain show that fire frequencies and size are greater in salt cedar-infested sites compared to analogous non-infested sites. In salt cedar-dominated areas, 35 percent of the vegetation burned within a 10-year period (1981-1992) compared to the mesquite-dominated areas that burned 2 percent of the vegetation within the same time period. Dead and senesced woody materials, combined with an accumulation of leaf litter in salt cedar infested sites, creates a fuel load that can lead to an increase in the frequency of fires..." USU Cooperative Extension 2006, Saltcedar (Agweeds2006.01)
Water Quality/Quantity:
Tamarisk tree uses about the same amount of water as a native tree and grow in much denser stands (USU Cooperative Extension 2006, Saltcedar (Agweeds2006.01)). Therefore, on a per acre basis, Tamarisk are using significantly more water than native trees (Thompson, Christopher L., "Treatment of Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.): Economics and Feasibility" (2008)). By removing dense thickets of mature Tamarisk, and the expected recolonization of native plant and tree species into these cleared areas, the wetland zone can return to natural vegetation. This project will contribute to watershed health since this is a terminal wetland and is a priority area for groundwater recharge efforts led by CICWD. It is a WRI focus area and in direct proximity to other watershed projects including all phases of Duncan Creek, Vandenburg Fire Rehab efforts, North Hills thinning, and Pinto watershed restoration efforts.
Compliance:
NEPA for the project area has been completed (Quichapa Wetland and Vegetation Enhancement Project (DOI-BLM-C010-2017-0048-EA)). Cultural surveys will be completed prior to implementation where required.
Methods:
The first effort of tamarisk removal was completed in November of 2018 through a partnership with Iron County. A tractor with a mower implement and a sprayer attached to a vehicle was used to complete the mow/cut and spray operation. The tractor was unable to cut the more mature and dense stands of Tamarisk and along banks where the soil was too wet to access. Tamarisk Management Phase 1 will include aerial chemical application to address 300-350 acres of tamarisk along the lake shore where equipment cannot be used. On the southern end within an inland wetland, we will use a mini excavator to pull trees and pile them. Phase 2 will include hand thinning and spray to address dead trees and any regrowth on approximately 150 acres. Phase 3 will repeat methods used in Phase 2 to address the remaining acres of dead trees. This staggered approach will allow for some wildlife cover and waterfowl hunting blinds to exist as tamarisk is replaced with desired vegetation. Future efforts will use adaptive methods to ensure tamarisk management throughout the area. Seeding in the southern inland wetland area where mechanical work is to be completed may occur based on BLM vegetation monitoring results while planting willows and other wetland vegetation will occur around the lake shore. Removal and spray activities will likely occur in mid summer to fall to ensure best success rate and to avoid the potential for nesting birds in the area. Wetland Management Installation of water management structure will be installed on existing culverts within the dike in phase 1. Once the area has dried and conditions allow, phase 2 will include excavation work to build additional islands and create deeper pools in an effort to increase pool depth and water retention. Seeding and planting may occur as BLM vegetation monitoring reveals species present once tamarisk has been removed. Upland Vegetation Management Approximately 10 acres on the north end and 20 acres on the south end will be 2 way chained and broadcast seeded. The seed mix is intended for upland game cover and forage. Additionally, upland shrubs tolerant for the area (based on experiences on Clear Lake) will be planted to promote a variety of upland habitats. Recreation Management After cadastral surveys are completed by the BLM, boundary signs will be installed to inform the public of BLM and private land boundaries. Additionally, kiosks and a parking lot may be constructed in phase 3 to promote habitat protection along existing roads.
Monitoring:
Monitoring data would be collected by BLM prior to and after project implementation to assess the success/failure of vegetation treatments, wildlife response, and hydrologic condition improvements. This monitoring would include wildlife surveys, evaporation rates, and photo points depending on personnel and work load. Photo points have been established to visually compare and evaluate success of any vegetation alteration phases of the project. Wildlife surveys including species presence/abundance, and trend (e.g., bats, waterbird stopover) have been collected at Quichapa Lake. This data would continue to be acquired annually to determine the wildlife response to project implementations. Hydrologic conditions would be monitored to assess the watershed health in the Quichapa Lake basin, using proper functioning condition assessments, evaporation monitoring, and TDS monitoring. Tamarisk management would be ongoing and annually assessed through BLM weeds program.
Partners:
On November 26, 2019 BLM led a tour for UDWR, SUU, County officials, and sportsmen groups to garner ideas, support, and collaboration on the proposed project. Iron County- participated in 2018 as part of the Iron County Weed Management Area Agreement for phase 1 of the project (80 acres in 2018) and expressed their continued support for the effort. CICWD- Support the plan in conjunction with groundwater recharge efforts and 2018 NEPA analysis UDWR- Support the plan to remove Tamarisk and create/improve waterfowl and upland game habitat to support hunting and viewing. SITLA and surrounding private landowners have expressed interest in tamarisk management efforts. These lands will be collaboratively addressed with future NRCS partnerships. Sportsment groups, particularly SFW have expressed interest in all phases of this project including private land acquisitions of real estate for sale surrounding the lake.
Future Management:
As identified in the Quichapa Lake Wetland and Vegetation Enhancement Project EA, there are several phases to this project (see below, Methods Section, and attached document). The BLM would continue to aggressively treat Tamarisk resprouts and further phases would likely include the treatment of the surrounding private land, native woody species pole plantings, and construction of small holding ponds to improve habitat for waterfowl and migratory birds. Phase 1 Aerial / Mechanical control and removal of tamarisk. Remove approximately 30 acres of old age class sagebrush and replace with preferred grass / shrub species for upland game and pollinators. Plant up to 100 upland trees/shrubs. Create cottontail rabbit habitat with woodpiles of washed out logs. Install signs to identify BLM boundaries and promote recreational opportunities. Install water regulation system to control inundation south of dam. Phase 2 Continue tamarisk management through hand thinning and chemical treatment. Pole plantings of willow, cottonwood, etc. of riparian woody vegetation along inundation line. Stabilize wetland vegetation with bulrush, sedges, etc. Manage inundation to promote growth of desirable submergent vegetation. Mechanical removal of tamarisk as needed. Phase 3 Continue tamarisk management through hand thinning. Pole plantings of willow, cottonwood, etc. of riparian woody vegetation along inundation line. Adaptive management of upland vegetation as needed. Construct small islands and ponds through dredging and excavation. Stabilize wetland vegetation with bulrush, sedges, etc. Seek opportunities for a parking lot and signing to guide recreation.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Recreation is at the forefront of the sustainable uses that would benefit from the habitat improvement efforts at Quichapa Lake proposed in this project. Hunting and viewing on public lands containing wetlands is naturally limited in southern Utah. This project provides an opportunity to encourage and sustain waterfowl hunting as well as promotes upland game hunting through sustaining wetland conditions and enhancing upland vegetation. UDWR annually releases pheasants on BLM lands within the project area. Wetland and vegetation improvement as well as public access management would also facilitate upland game hunting and wildlife viewing opportunities. Birding is a popular activity at Quichapa and would be promoted as a non-consumptive use of the area. Although identified as part of the Swett Hills allotment the project area is not currently grazed due to logistics; however if this becomes a viable management tool, grazing would certainly benefit.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$75,333.00 $0.00 $75,333.00 $37,160.00 $112,493.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies Wetland Phase 1 - Materials for water management system in existing culverts to allow south end to dry up to promote submergent vegetation and for creation of deeper pools and islands. $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Archaeological Clearance Archeology Clearance funding provided by BLM for 800 acres @ $23.70 within the project area. $0.00 $0.00 $18,960.00 2021
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Cedar City Field Office will provide seasonal wildlife biologists to assist with cottontail rabbit habitat piles from washed out woody debris and stacking of tamarisk trees. Four seasonal employees for 2 weeks @ $4,100/week $0.00 $0.00 $8,200.00 2021
Seed (GBRC) Upland Phase 1 - Seed is for food and cover for upland game species $24,583.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Materials and Supplies Upland Phase 1 - Potted shrubs and planting equipment. Estimated $15/shrub for 200 shrubs and $5000 for irrigation and planting equipment $8,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Tamarisk Phase 1 - Costs for rental and fuel for mini excavator. Estimated $3000/month for 2 months $6,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Upland Phase 1 - Two-way chain upland vegetation and broadcast seed @ $250/acre for 30 acres $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) Tamarisk Phase 1 - BLM personnel costs to operate mini excavator in removal of Tamarisk. $6500/month for 2 months $13,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Tamarisk Phase 1 - Aerial tamarisk treatment (includes chemical) @ $35/acre for 350 acres $12,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
NEPA Quichapa Wetland and Vegetation Enhancement Project $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$51,966.00 $0.00 $51,966.00 $37,477.15 $89,443.15
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM (Range) A097 Mod 3 $17,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
BLM (Sage Grouse) A096 Mod 4 - $30k RF - $4,966 $34,966.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
BLM (Range) Inkind includes personal services (Archaeological clearance, Cadastral, Monitoring, Survey and Design, etc...). $0.00 $0.00 $37,160.00 2021
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $317.15 2022
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American White Pelican N4
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Desert Cottontail R5
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Desert Cottontail R5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Mourning Dove R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation High
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Dams and Water Management / Use High
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Droughts High
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration High
Open Water
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Project Comments
Comment 02/08/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Erica, I support removal of tamarisk and preventing its spread. However, I'm not certain all the benefits listed will be realized. First and foremost, is CICWCD willing to allow water into the lake bed? The whole reason they built those recharge ponds was to prevent water from being "wasted" through evaporation from Quichapa. What commitment have they made to make certain water will be available to benefit the species you list? As for the list, it is redundant. You list several species of "waterfowl" then also list many individually. Ring-necked pheasants and cottontails will use tamarisk for cover. I don't see how cutting the tamarisk w/o replacing it with another cover species will be beneficial to them. I agree this is an important waterfowl resting, stop-over and pre-migration congregation point, especially for shore birds and smaller wading birds, and I would like it to continue to function in that way. However, I think there are some aspects of this project that could be strengthened. Keith
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Keith, we are attempting to Make Quichapa Great Again. I will just address the species list and let Erica talk about agreements with CICWCD. The redundancy in species exists because there was an option of capturing the large diversity of waterfowl species using Quichapa as "waterfowl" (ex. Northern Pintail, Northern Shoveler, Widgeon, etc.) in addition to those that are available from the dropdown menu which are associated with a High Interest Game or Fish Rank. We can certainly make adjustments if necessary. Pheasants and cottontails were included since they will benefit as Tamarisk are removed and the upland is improved in future planting phases. We hope to provide improved upland game habitat through this project.
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Keith, although there is not a specific amount of water going back into Quichapa Lake, the agreement CICWCD and BLM came to was that the project would include a canal from the proposed pond they are constructing (new holding pond that will be partially on BLM and Private) that would deposit excess flows into Quichapa Lake. Our phase 3 of this project would be to construct smaller ponds within the lakebed itself in order to help reduce evaporation rates. The small impoundments within the lakebed will hopefully extend the time water is available versus allowing it to deposit into the lakebed and evaporate. It is expected that the CICWCD holding pond would also provide habitat for waterfowl and migratory birds. Thank you for your comments, I will allow Dustin to respond to your concerns regarding Burrowing Owl and Utah Prairie Dog.
Comment 02/08/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Erica, I don;t see how burrowing owls and UPD will benefit. As far as I know their habitats are not yet impacted. Also, band-tailed pigeon is a forest species. Keith
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Keith, UPD were observed on the east side of the lake last year while removing tamarisk on the north end. UPD and BUOW were included from the expected potential habitat expansion. This will ultimately depend on inundation levels. Band-tailed pigeon have been removed. Thanks for the comments.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Adam Kavalunas
Hey Dustin, Great project which I'm excited to see carried out, but I'm skeptical about the benefits to UPDs. It looks like most if not all the project is taking place in the floodplain (former lake line) which will not likely be favorable to prairie dogs. The overarching objective of the project is to enhance wetland habitat, and they tend to avoid areas of potential flooding. Also, the closest mapped colonies are almost a mile away which haven't been active in 20 years. The closest active colonies are almost 2 miles away directly east near Meadows Ranches subdivision. If BLM observed UPD's very near this proposed project we would like to see that data. Thanks.
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Erica, Nice to see another project targeting real trees of darkness. I see you have picked up the "Make Quichapa Great Again!" banner that I heard Dustin and Conner talk about in the past. Multiple suggestions for you. Please see the new scoring criteria on the 2020 project ranking sheet. The HIG and SGCN categories now have Quality/Benefit/Need points and the description of these should be included in your project need/objective and or threats and risks categories. You have quite the list of species benefitting so this could be quite a task! Similarly, Threats and Risks was changed to Ecological Thresholds, with the focus now being on what the economic, ecological and/or social risks of not completing the project right now are. Also in addition to livestock use there is now a new 10 point category called other sustainable uses, which you have not addressed at all in the proposal and should be addressed in the Livestock, Sustainable Uses section in the database. Finally there is also a new 10 point watershed health category, where the emphasis is on how your project address a key location or issue in your watershed and ties into other project surrounding it. What are the values at risk should there be a wildfire? Are TDS a water quality issue for Quichapa or the CICWCD? How and where are you conducting TDS monitoring? Not sure this project addresses the Threat of Water Allocation Policies as described in the WAP and I would be interested as to how it you think it offsets the threat of Groundwater Pumping. What have your discussions been with SITLA and private landowners adjacent to the project besides Iron County? Does it support objectives in the Iron County Resource Management Plan? What about plans for any of the species listed as benefitting? Species specific monitoring for the species listed as benefitting from BLM or UDWR? Future Management -- Monitoring, maintenance, adaptive management? Any plans in place to ensure that the treatment is successful?
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
I have updated the project regarding your suggestions, and have also included them here as a quick reference. 1)Dustin has updated the HIG and SGCN within the Need for Project category regarding the species benefiting. 2) Ecological Thresholds; the spread of nonnative woody invasive vegetation (listed as a class 3 weed in Utah), and continued loss of water resources as tamarisk spreads further into the uplands, replacing xeric vegetation such as greasewood shrublands and mixed salt desert scrub, potential reduction of water for both the Quichapa lake and the ground water recharge project due to the current dense stands and recruiting Tamarisk. 3) TDS evaluations have been done by CICWCD and they will continue monitoring. Although TDS may not have an impact on Quichapa for waterfowl habitat it will be an interesting comparison once CICWCD have constructed the holding pond. 4)There are many landowners adjacent to the project. Discussions with one of the larger land owners has taken place and is interested in removing Tamarisk from his property. Stan and I discussed that once land owners start seeing the project taking place it will be easier to do outreach and include them in further phases. 5)Tamarisk removal does support the Iron County Resource Plan and although they have identified water that would be going into Quichapa for recharge purposes, the plan does note that during years of good moisture water will be available for Quichapa and waterfowl. Also, the water impoundment that CICWCD is constructing on BLM and private will also provide habitat for birds and recreation. 6)Monitoring and maintenance of the Tamarisk treatment will continue, resprouts will be treated and the variety of tools used and their success rates will be monitored. Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Cool project, refreshing to see a project dealing with wetlands, waterfowl, and shorebird habitat. Mike pointed out some good things that have changed in how projects will be ranked differently this year that differ from the past. I am interested in seeing the results of mowing over the next couple years. You hinted some that this was phase I of a longer term project. Laying out the longer term goals and actions may have helped to understand the project a little better. Again great project and way to take on something different.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Clint, I have updated the objectives section to include a guideline for further phases we have put together for the Quichapa project, hopefully this helps give the big picture. Thank you for your comments.
Comment 02/19/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Hi Erica - Just to clarify, I don't believe the NEPA stated that a cultural survey would not be required. Granted, typically for a chemical treatment a pedestrian survey is not necessary but even chemical application requires some kind of Section 106 review and SHPO consultation. I am concerned that the use of a skid steer has the potential for ground disturbance that could warrant a more intensive investigation, especially where the Class I indicated the presence of archaeological sites in the area.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Laurel, I have made the updates. Thank you for your help.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Clint, I have updated the objectives section to include a guideline for further phases we have put together for the Quichapa project, hopefully this helps give the big picture. Thank you for your comments.
Comment 01/28/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Dustin, I do not remember what the original proposal looked like - the one that drew my long comment. It appears that my concerns have been met and the project details are much improved. I would add one caution - there are PYRA records from around the lake. Keith
Comment 01/31/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Thanks for the comment Keith, we have made several revisions to the original proposal. I will incorporate PYRA surveys into the monitoring for this area.
Comment 01/29/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Dustin! Looks like a cool project. I have been tasked with validating Species Threat this year. I did not see any research in the proposal so wondering how you are addressing the "Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range" threat for pelicans as listed in the WAP? Also in terms of your map features I am assuming they are the entire project? This Phase is 350 acres of aerial death for tamarisk, 30 acres of upland chaining, seeding and planting, plus how many acres of the mini-ex pulling out true trees of darkness? Just trying to get it straight in my brain.
Comment 01/31/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Thanks for the comment Mike. There is no specific research to be conducted for pelicans; however when Quichapa has been indundated we conducted waterbird surveys and observed pelicans. If we are able to improve/sustain inundation and through regular monitoring we may be able to contribute information on pelican use of the area thereby improving understanding of their distribution in southern Utah. As far as acreages, there are currently 300-350 acres of tamarisk identified for aerial application. The mini-ex approach will be applied to approximately 40 acres of an ephemeral wetland on the southern end. Management timing and approaches will vary depending on indundation....just trying to avoid getting stuck in the mud
Comment 02/06/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Heather Talley
Just a quick comment about pelicans utilizing the area -- we have some pelicans with transmitters that are monitored through the Migration Initiative. Several stop at Quichipa or fly close to it, so I'm sure they would benefit by using Quichipa as a stop-over area.
Comment 01/13/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Will you update your Finance Page to show FY2021 instead of FY2020. Thanks.
Comment 01/13/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Thanks for the comment, the Finance Page has been updated
Comment 08/29/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please enter any missing expenses, highlighted in rust, on the Finance Page. When you have completed that please go back to the Completion Form and finalize your report again so I know that it has been completed. Thanks.
Comment 08/31/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thanks for making those additions. I have moved this project to completed.
Completion
Start Date:
12/08/2021
End Date:
06/28/2022
FY Implemented:
2022
Final Methods:
Phase 1 focused on archeology clearance for areas identified for tamarisk removal and issuing a contract for 60 acres of tamarisk removal and piling using an excavator. In summer of 2022, approximately 61 acres of tamarisk was removed using an excavator and piled with the intention to burn the piles in winter 2022/2023. Other phases were funded and implemented at the same time. The following is what was completed. Phase 2 was funded with year-end money which placed an emphasis on completing the construction and fencing of 2 parking lots, excavating 10 islands within the wetland, and beginning tamarisk removal in June 2021 prior to implementing phase 1 tamarisk removal. In 2019, 21 acres of tamarisk was mowed and sprayed on the north end of the lake.
Project Narrative:
The archeology clearance for 190.5 acres was completed by Logan Simpson for a Class III cultural resources survey that resulted in a finding of "No Adverse Effect" and concurrence from USHPO on April 11, 2022. Subsequently, a contract was issued for tamarisk removal for 60 acres which was completed on 6/28/22. Additionally, signing materials were purchased and installed by the BLM June 2022.
Future Management:
Future management includes a plan to burn piles of tamarisk within the 60 acres in the winter 2022/2023. The area may be chained and seeded based on results observed spring 2023. Tamarisk removal using the same methodology will continue in phase 3.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
9187 Affected Area
11760 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop-pile-burn
Project Map
Project Map