YMCA Youth Camp Vegetation Treatment
Project ID: 4866
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Scott Frost
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Kamas/Heber Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
Remove large beetle killed spruce in the Mill Hollow drainage around the YMCA camp facility and surrounding area to improve fire resiliency and reduce falling hazards. In addition, clean up large diameter trees in stream courses to improve hydrologic function and habitat.
Location:
Mill Hollow drainage on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, near the YMCA youth summer camp. 40 28' 48" N, 11 05' 07" E.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The YMCA camp area is in need of vegetation management in order to reduce wildfire WUI concerns, improve safety for thousands of youth campers, restore forest health and function for big game species, increase forage for grazing allotment, and improve watershed conditions. Primary focus is terrestrial and aquatic wildlife and fuels reduction. * Hazard tree and fuel build-up: spruce beetle outbreaks in large diameter spruce have created nearly complete mortality of the overstory trees in this drainage. This creates a safety hazard from tree fall to camp personnel and youth. Furthermore, once trees have fallen to the forest floor, the increase of fuel will continue to build and worsen potential for high severity fire if an ignition occurs within the drainage. By cutting and removing large hazard trees from the camp perimeter, high severity fire potential can be reduced. Once treatment is complete, much of the surrounding forest around the camp will act as a shaded fuelbreak, improving the ability of fire suppression resources to stop fire from reaching the camp and conducting burnout operations if required. * Removal of large dead trees and downfall will increase sunlight to the forest floor of understory and increase forage for big game species and improve access to meadow forage areas for livestock grazing. * Timber sale areas often have large meadows within the forested areas that are grazed by livestock. The amount of grazing in these areas depends largely on the amount of residual trees, the amount of downfall and ease of being able to move through the forested area to more suitable range. The removal of dead trees will allow greater access to this transitional area, easing movement to adjoning pastures. * Felled hazard tree removal: Previous cutting of hazard trees in the Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas (RHCAs) and nearby uplands have created a hazardous fuel build-up and degraded in-stream hydrology. In addition to the cutting and removal of standing dead trees, some of the large felled trees would be removed and piled for burning others would be place in stream when beneficial.
Objectives:
* Treat 57 acres of large diameter, beetle-killed timber by cutting, decking, and removing trees by selling logs. Treatment area is located in Mill Hollow, the drainage the YMCA camp is located in. This will reduce potential watershed degradation from high severity fire by removing standing dead and future dead and down fuels. * Improving the fire outlook, increases in habitat heterogeneity and forage would benefit habitat conditions for deer, elk, and bear. * 30 acres of this treatment area is in or adjacent to Boreal toad and Bonneville cutthroat trout habitat. Removal and rearrangement of dead vegetative materials within and near the stream channel would benefit habitat condition, improve the hyrdrograph, increase flow and extend year-round habitat further up the drainage. * Improve safety conditions for the youth camp, nearby trails, recreation areas, and surrounding forest area by removal of dead hazard trees.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
* Entire overstory mortality of spruce has created the high potential for high severity fire if left untreated. With time, these large dead trees will fall to the forest floor, creating very high levels of fuel loading conducive to fire that would burn for a longer duration and at a higher energy output than typical conditions. Results of this type of fire would denude the landscape of vegetation, increase the potential for soil erosion, degrade water quality as a result of runoff, and remove potential habitat for wildlife species. Additionally, existing dead trees constitute a safety hazard to camp staff and youth from trees falling. The potential for trees to fail and fall increases with each subsequent year after death of the tree. The threat of high severity fire further increases risk, due to the threats of WUI influences.
Relation To Management Plan:
* The Upper Provo Management Area is an important area for terrestrial wildlife species because this area provides connectivity to large forested areas on the Wasatch-Cache and Ashley National Forests in the Uinta Mountains. The primary habitat types are aspen forest, conifer forest (primarily spruce/fir), and sagebrush (USDA Forest Service, Unita Forest Plan, 2003, 5-149). - See: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/uwcnf/landmanagement/planning/?cid=stelprdb5076960&width=full * Habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and fire intensity and effects are threatening boreal toad populations (UDWR. 2005. Boreal Toad (bufo boreas boreas) Conservation Plan. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, PN# 05-37, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 12-17). - See: http://digitallibrary.utah.gov/awweb/awarchive?type=file&item=9767 * Elk Herd Unit Management Plan, Unit #17 (Wasatch Mountains, 2016): Within the next five years, enhance forage production on a minimum of 20,000 acres of elk habitat, through direct range improvements to maintain population management objectives. - See: https://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting-in-utah/hunting-information/big-game/118-hunting/big-game/1965-unit-elk-management-plans.html * Deer Herd Unit Management Plan- Deer Herd Unit #17 (Wasatch Mountains, 2016): Cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvement projects. Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the unit by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. - See: https://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/plans/deer_17.pdf * Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan (2014) This project will help address Habitat Objectives 1 & 2: - Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. - Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. - See: https://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame/pdf/mule_deer_plan.pdf * Utah Elk Statewide Management Plan (2015) This project will help address Habitat Objective 1: - Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. - See: https://wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame/pdf/elk_plan.pdf * Draft Bonneville Cutthroat Trout range-wide conservation agreement and strategy, and monitoring plan (2018, p. 19) - This project will help mitigate potential threats to BCT from high severity-fire. Forty-three of the occupied sub-watersheds, primarily in the Northern Bonneville, are at high risk for both fire and flood. * Wasatch County Plan (2001, Chapter 5) This project will support the local economy by providing opportunities for harvesting forest products shall by selling decked trees removed from the area. - See: https://www.wasatch.utah.gov/Portals/0/Planning/Pdfs/GeneralPlan/6-ChapterFive2013.pdf
Fire / Fuels:
Treatment of large diameter spruce fuels would be beneficial for: * Mitigating the potential of high severity fire given an ignition by reducing fuel loading * Creating what closely resembles shaded fuel breaks through vegetation treatment and removal * Improving access through Forest Service in-kind road improvements to aid fire suppression resources * Improving ingress-egress for camp personnel and public in emergency fire circumstances
Water Quality/Quantity:
These vegetation treatments are expected to result in an overall improvement to wildfire resiliency in the watershed and in Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas (RHCA) located in Mill Hollow, in addition to improving stream process and function by removal of large dead fuels (Uinta National Forest Plan, 2003), including: * Improving conditions so that soil, air, and water resources provide for watershed health, public health and safety, long-term soil productivity, and ecosystem sustainability, and meet applicable laws and regulations (FW-Goal-1, p. 2-1). * Improving conditions so that biologically diverse, sustainable ecosystems maintain or enhance habitats for native flora and fauna, forest and rangeland health, watershed health, and water quality (FW-Goal-2, p. 2-1). * Maintaining or improving soil productivity by preventing potential detrimental impacts to soil from severe fire (S&W-1, p. 3-8). * Maintaining habitat for aquatic species, including fish, wildlife, and riparian plant communities (S&W-9, p. 3-9). * Maintaining channel stability and capacity for passing flood (S&W-9, p. 3-9). Additionally, the treatment will result in an increase in ground cover and a subsequent reduction in erosion potential, improving and protecting water quality. In channel treatments (LWD placement) will benefit the hydrograph by lowering peak flows and extending the duration of the runoff period and increasing bank storage, increasing water quantity during late summer months. Down-system benefits also include helping Deer Creek Reservoir, a receiving body of Mill Creek drainage waters, reach attainment of goals identified in its 2002 TMDL. Water Quality will not be impacted during project implementation as BMPs will be utilized to remove, or at least reduce, potential short term impacts.
Compliance:
NEPA is complete for the YMCA camp. Archaeology clearance will be completed before implementation - scheduled for July 2019.
Methods:
Vegetation would be cut with mechanical equipment and chain-saws. Cut fuels and additional dead and down fuels already on the forest floor would either be shovel logged or skidded to landings and be sorted into piles to later sold by competitive bid, opened up to public for firewood, or burned as a last option. Merchantable material sold would be loaded onto logging trucks and shipped to nearby mills. The existing road to the camp would be renovated to USFS standards. Any temporary road or water-crossing structures built for vegetation treatment would be rehabilitated using mechanical equipment before project close-out.
Monitoring:
* Forest stocking and temporary roads will be monitored to ensure adequate re-vegetation and the absence of weeds. Reseeding or weed treatment will be completed, by USFS, if they are needed. * Fish and amphibian sampling will be conducted before and after project for presence/absence data to document expanding occupation. USFS will implement all monitoring. Data will be uploaded to database.
Partners:
* USFS - Conducted planning, layout, building contract specifications, sale and disposal of decked and residual material from cut trees, and will provide project oversight and monitoring * YMCA - Camp coordinates with USFS personnel that oversee special use permit. YMCA also takes care of hazard tree removal within the camp footprint. Coordination has already occurred for camp shutdown to facilitate proposed vegetation treatment. * Allotment Permittee - Will coordinate to avoid conflicts with livestock due to mechanical equipment and vegetation treatments. * Wasatch County - Already have an agreement in place for road maintenance with the county that provides access to the YMCA camp and Mill Hollow drainage. * DWR - USFS has communicated with DWR to run the proposed vegetation treatment contract to expedite contracting and implementation due to the time sensitive nature of this project.
Future Management:
This project proposal would be the first of a multi-year vegetation treatment plan within Mill Hollow drainage. Subsequent years would have increased acres treated. The YMCA camp area will continue to be monitored for fuel build-up and for over-stocking. Future treatments would include thinning of the small diameter trees in 10-20 years. Grazing will be delayed until ground has healed sufficiently.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
* Removal of fuels and shading will improve understory grass, forb, and shrub production available for grazing. This treatment area is located within a current allotment. * Recreation use of the YMCA camp. Nearby trails, dispersed recreation, fishing, and hunting for the general public. * Commercially viable timber will be sold from the decked material, benefiting local economy.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$97,500.00 $14,162.00 $111,662.00 $8,539.00 $120,201.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services 27 acres, tree and down material removal and decking (dry) $40,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services 30 acres, tree and down material removal and decking (wet) $57,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) Road design work $0.00 $0.00 $1,539.00 2019
Equipment Rental/Use Road crew equipment, culvert replacement, time $0.00 $7,584.00 $0.00 2019
NEPA CE proposal development $0.00 $0.00 $7,000.00 2019
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Layout, cruise, marking, cruise check $0.00 $6,578.00 $0.00 2019
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$97,500.00 $14,162.00 $111,662.00 $8,539.00 $120,201.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) Cruise plan, layout, cruise, cruise check $0.00 $14,162.00 $0.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) CE development, Road Design, Roadwork $0.00 $0.00 $8,539.00 2020
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (UWRI) Dry and wet vegetation removal of standing dead, already down and dead, and decking of material $97,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Black Bear
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Disease – Alien Organisms Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Disease – Alien Organisms Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Disease – Alien Organisms High
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Low
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Problematic Insects – Native High
Project Comments
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
You state in the proposal that you have communicated with DWR to run the proposed vegetation treatment contract. Since I am the one who usually runs the DWR contracts in the Northeastern Region, and you haven't communicated with me, I'm curious who you talked to about that.
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Justin Robinson
Tory, We talked with Mark Farmer before we realized this project is in the NE Region. We are proposing another similar project that is in Central Region and I had planned on discussing (at the Presentation mtg next week) if you wanted to run this one and Mark the other or let him run both since this is border country. I will also bring those thoughts up with him. Sorry communication didn't happen faster but we are scrambling with the recent shutdown and its time crunch. Thanks, Justin
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
Sounds good. I say if you have already discussed things with Mark, and if he's okay with doing it, then go that way. It's the partnership that's important, not the boundary.
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
You have Aspen-Conifer listed as one of the WAP habitats this project is benefitting. The WAP defines the Aspen-Conifer habitat strictly in terms of healthy aspen stands, and pure conifer areas really aren't applicable. Does this project promote aspen? If it does, it's fine to claim this habitat. If not, and the project is focused on conifer health, it probably should be removed.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Frost
Hi Tory, while the aspen component in the immediate footprint of our project is small, aspen is present and there would be benefits to aspen from implementation. 1. The project area is bordered by large aspen stands to the east and west. Removal of snags and excessive down fuel in this area immediately adjacent to aspen stands would improve the likelihood for aspen suckering and age class diversification in these areas. 2. There is a component of mixed conifer-aspen in the northern and eastern parts of the project area, removal of large snags and dead and down would improve prospects of aspen regeneration and improve residual aspen tree vigor. 3. Addressing the already high fuels loads and rapidly increasing fuel loads of 100 and 1,000 hour fuels would improve fire resiliency for the mixed conifer-aspen areas with the project area and adjacent aspen stands.
Comment 02/13/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Miles Hanberg
Have you pursued any kind of fuels reduction or WUI type funding for this project? The relatively small size and proximity to the YMCA Camp make this feel a lot like a WUI type project. I still think it will have the benefits you are claiming in the proposal. If there are more WRI projects than funds, tapping into any fuels type funds becomes important. I am excited to see these dead and dying conifer areas being addressed. Thank You
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Frost
Hi Miles, thanks for your comment. We are approaching WRI to help with YMCA because there are no fuels dollars earmarked for the camp area this year. The safety risk to campers makes this a project we would like to move on as fast as possible. Partnering with the State to run the contract for us would help us to get the implementation done more quickly than we would ourselves. We have tapped into fuels/timber money over the past 5-7 years as the spruce beetles began killing the overstory trees piece-meal and in subsequent years as more trees died. There have been 3 different entries that I am aware of in attempting to clean up dead fuels and mitigate safety risks. This would be the last entry in the near vicinity of the camp to clean-up. Hope this helps and provides some context.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Tyler Thompson
Please change the map from "affected area" to more appropriate treatment types. Affected area is more of a generic placeholder we use for things like cultural clearances and NEPA.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Scott Frost
Tyler, thanks for catching me on that, I have gone back and categorized the project.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8050 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
Project Map
Project Map