San Juan River Restoration 3.0 - Utah
Project ID: 4871
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: 488
Project Manager: Gabriel Bissonette
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Moab
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southeastern
Description:
This collaborative BLM and FFSL project is needed to complete the third phase of initial Russian olive and tamarisk treatment and resprout treatments along the San Juan river using frill cut, lop/scatter, and mastication. Objectives include: restoring riparian vegetation communities, reducing the risk of wildfire, wildlife habitat, off-channel fish habitat, and improving river recreational experience. This is a continuation of WRI #4174 which incorporated and replaced WRI #3779.
Location:
The overall San Juan River Project area encompasses approximately 3,089 acres from Montezuma Creek downstream to Lake Powell. However, the spatial focus of this phase is at the Gold Mine Site (riparian/side channel restoration), 5 miles on river right from Mexican Hat downstream, and private property near Bluff, UT.
Project Need
Need For Project:
NOTE: San Juan 3.0 was funded in fy2020 however funds were not utilized. The BLM cooperative agreement with the Canyon Country Youth Corps was expiring which was not known at the time of proposal submission. This cooperative agreement was intended to serve as in-kind BLM match for the next several iterations of the project. However, these funds needed to be spent prior to Nov. 2019, zeroing out the primary in-kind fund source for this and future projects. $103,599 of cooperative agreement match funds were spent in conjunction with San Juan 2.0 WRI dollars to complete more work under San Juan 2.0 than was anticipated leaving San Juan 3.0 funds unspent. The need exists to implement San Juan 3.0 and instead of carrying over the project, we are resubmitting it as "proposed" to allow collaboration with FFSL. The removal of Russian olive outlined in this proposal is needed to mitigate the loss of seasonally inundated side channel and floodplain habitats, help restore fluvial processes necessary to maintain these habitats, improve wildlife habitat and native diversity by restoring native riparian plant communities, improving water yield and quality, reduce the risk of wildfire, and improve opportunities for sustainable use by improving recreational access. The introduction of Russian olives (Eleagnus angustifolia) to western North America, combined with altered flow regimes caused by extensive damming and diversion of rivers during the 20th Century, resulted in synergistic interactions that radically altered aquatic and riparian ecosystems on the Colorado Plateau. Dams and diversions have altered flow regimes and reduced or eliminated periods of inundation of floodplain habitats, which favored establishment of Russian olives over native willows and cottonwoods, which thrive in periodically flooded riparian areas. Russian olives then displaced native vegetation and altered ecosystem processes through high levels of nitrogen fixation, high inputs of organic debris (roughly 25 times higher than ecologically similar native vegetation), and input of decay-resistant leaf litter that interferes with aquatic nutrient cycling (Katz and Shafroth 2003. Wetlands 23:763-777; Mineau et al. 2012. Ecology 93:1501-1508). These changes impacted aquatic and riparian ecosystems in ways that favored the establishment and spread of a host of other invasive species, ranging from tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) to common carp (Cyprinus carpio). The cascade of ecosystem changes that establishment of Russian olives sets in motion has been referred to as "invasive species meltdown." The resultant impacts are perhaps most severe in side channel and backwater habitats of rivers, which tend to fill with sediment and organic debris over time when encroached upon by dense stands of invasive vegetation. Russian olives are especially problematic due to their extremely high input of organic debris and their ability to form dense monocultures and closed canopies. Thus, the reduction of Russian olive and subsequent restoration of native riparian vegetation improves watershed health, enhances biological diversity, and increases water yield (i.e. less evapotranspiration) and water quality (i.e. dramatically reduced nitrogen inputs). The portion of the San Juan River that flows through the Four Corners and Lower San Juan subbasins (HUC 14080201 & 14080205, respectively) serves as critical habitat for remnant populations of three endangered species of fish (Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, and razorback sucker) and supports populations of three sensitive species of fish (roundtail chub, bluehead sucker, and flannelmouth sucker). Side channel habitat is especially important as spawning and nursery habitat for these fishes. The side channel habitat in the project area is fringed by native willows (Salix spp.) and is inundated during periods of high flow, but is being rapidly encroached upon by Russian olives. Continued encroachment by Russian olives threatens to eliminate this habitat to the detriment of native fishes and amphibians. In addition, eventual replacement of the remaining native willows by Russian olive monocultures threatens to eliminate habitat important to several species of breeding birds, including the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and the threatened western distinct population of yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). The reduction of Russian olive again improves watershed health, enhances biological diversity, and facilitates the recovery of endangered and sensitive fishes while facilitating fluvial processes to naturally maintain these habitats in the future. Russian olive is a significant barrier to accessing dispersed campsites and its thorns provide significant risk of personal injury and puncturing inflatable watercraft. The removal of invasive species and restoration of native riparian vegetation improves access and the recreational experience of rafters and campers. Opportunities for sustainable uses are therefore improved. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Canyon Country Fire Zone (CYFZ) conducted an in depth landscape level burn probability analysis based on LandFire data sets and calibrated using a command line version of FlamMap called RANDIG. This fire modeling system was developed by Mark Finney at the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) and Allen Ager with the Western Wildland Threat Assessment Center. The CYFZ burn probability uses higher resolution based on 30 meter pixels and was calibrated at 90th percentile indices set to match conditions of recent large fires in the fire zone. The higher resolution and local calibration of this analysis helps delineate burn probability on long and narrow features, like the San Juan River, by decreasing the number of mixed pixels. The burn probability analysis shows that there is a significant threat of wildfire along the San Juan River corridor in the riparian zone. The wildfire threat has been exacerbated by the tamarisk beetle which has killed large stands of tamarisk during the past ten years. Removal of Russian olive reduces fuel loading and fire severity within a high use recreation corridor. This year with FFSL we are adding 112 treatment acres of WUI lands outside the town of Bluff. Bluff has seen 8 fires within town limits in the last 10 years and the riverside vegetation is by far the largest threat to the town's structures and residents. One of the fires in the last 10 years was ignited in the tamarisk and partially burned the kokopelli lodge. Part of the dynamic is that along with the tamarisk beetle, we are seeing that a lack of use of a historical canal through the floodplain south of Bluff is killing the tamarisk. Thick, dry, standing dead tamarisk along with live Russian olive and other exotics are threatening the town and it is a good time to reduce the fire risk and restore the floodplain to appropriate native vegetation.
Objectives:
The primary objectives of the proposed project on BLM lands are to kill Russian olive, tamarisk, and herbaceous weeds, up to 100 acres (per NEPA), in order to: Objective 1. Improve habitat for endangered and sensitive fish and native amphibians by restoring and preventing the further loss of seasonally inundated side channel habitats and backwaters at the Gold Mine Site. Objective 2. Restore and preserve fluvial processes that are necessary to maintain and enhance critical side channel/backwater fish habitat at the Gold Mine Site. Reducing invasive species (e.g. Russian olive) that increase roughness and sedimentation will help hydrologic processes under current flow regimes to scour and maintain side channel habitats. Objective 3. Improve water yield and quality by reducing Russian olive evapotranspiration and inputs of high-nitrogen litter into the system at all project sites. Objective 4. Restore native plant communities at all project sites by reducing invasive species cover, improving passive restoration potential, and through active revegetation where necessary. Objective 5. Improve wildlife habitat for Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, Yellow Billed Cuckoo, and wild turkey at all project sites, through the restoration of native riparian plant communities, increasing plant diversity, and restoration of adjacent side channel and backwater habitats. Objective 6. Reduce wildfire probability and increase public safety, at all project sites, by reducing fuel loading in high-use recreation areas. Objective 7. Improve the recreational experience and opportunities for sustainable uses, at all project sites, by improving dispersed camping access and reducing the risk of injury to inflatable watercraft and recreational boaters from overhanging thorny Russian olive. The primary objective on private lands is to: Objective 1. Reduce the fire threat to the town and reduce fire intensity in case of ignition. Improve fire response capabilities by masticating large paths through tamarisk. Objective 2. Restore native vegetation and improve habitat for native birds by reducing exotic invasive cover and actively revegetating. Objective 3. Improve recreation opportunities for town residents, who commonly access the river through these private lands.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Invasive plants are spreading rapidly across North America, including in the Monticello Field Office. These invasive species alter ecological and fluvial processes, negatively influence rangeland and riparian health, threaten critical fish and bird habitat, increase the fuel loading and risk of fire, cause economic losses, and displace native plant communities. Ecological damage from uncontrolled invasive plant infestations can be permanent; thereby leaving public lands unable to return to desired or natural conditions without control efforts. Noxious weeds are currently spreading at a rate of more than 4,600 acres per day on federal lands in the United States (Belliston, et. al., 2010). The greatest impact of invasive plants in the Monticello Field Office (MFO) is typically along the San Juan River corridor. Common invasive plants in riparian areas include Russian olive, tamarisk, a variety of invasive thistles, Russian knapweed, Whitetop, Ravennagrass, and Camelthorn. There are an estimated 35,000 BLM acres infested with invasive plants, with the majority being based on Russian Olive and Tamarisk infestation of riparian areas, adjacent terraces, and non-riparian ephemeral drainages (Final EIS, 2008). Russian Olives and Tamarisks are invasive in wet-saline environments and certain riparian zones, and have the ability to displace native plant species (USDA, 2002). Introduction of Tamarisks in the early to mid 1900's was followed by channel narrowing along many western rivers, such as the San Juan River (Vincent, et. al., 2009). Populations of Camelthorn are found along the San Juan River corridor, and are the only known infestation of this invasive species in Utah. Thus, Camelthorn is prioritized for treatment to prevent further infestations (Final EIS, 2008). The proliferation of woody invasives, if left unchecked, threatens to: 1. Hasten the permanent loss of critical side channel habitats utilized by endangered and sensitive fish. These channels are heavily invaded and historical imagery shows significant narrowing and loss of many of these habitats. Many side channels have crossed, are currently crossing, or a will soon cross the threshold. 2. Alter fluvial and nutrient cycling processes in a way that favors non-native species. Many sites have crossed this threshold but areas like the Gold Mine Site are at a critical point and can be restored. 3. Further degrade native vegetation communities. 4. Degrade wildlife habitat. 5. Increase fuel loading and risk of wildfire. 6. Degrade the recreational experience. There are few if any threats associated with implementation of this project. The only conceivable potential impact is loss of winter forage and nesting habitat for birds that may feed on Russian olive fruit or nest within stands of woody invasives, but there will be no shortage of Russian olives or tamarisk in riparian habitats surrounding the project area.
Relation To Management Plan:
(1) Monticello Resource Management Plan (RMP). The proposed action is in conformance with the MFO Resource Management Plan approved in November, 2008. The RMP responds to issues regarding noxious weeds and invasive species by utilizing BLM's integrated pest management strategies (combined use of mechanical, cultural, chemical, manual, biological, and preventative measures) (Final EIS, 2008). The goals and objectives outlined in the RMP include control of invasive and non-native weed species, and prevent the introduction of new invasive species through the implementation of a comprehensive weed program, including coordination with partners; prevention and early detection; education; inventory and monitoring; and principles of integrated weed management (Final EIS, 2008). (2) BLM National Policy Guidance on Special Status Species Management (Manual 6840). Provides direction for the conservation of special status animal and plant species as well as for their habitats. Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, Yellow-billed Cuckoo, Razorback Sucker, Colorado Pikeminnow, Flannelmouth Sucker, Bluehead Sucker, and Roundtail Chub are special status species that will benefit from this project. (3) The National Fire Plan. Designed to manage the potential impacts of wildland fire to communities and ecosystems and to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildland fire. The NFP focuses on strategies for improving fire preparedness, restoring and rehabilitating burned areas, reducing hazardous fuels, assisting communities, and identifying research needs. (4) BLM National Policy Guidance on Wildlife and Fisheries Management. This manual provides direction to restore, maintain and improve wildlife habitat conditions on public lands through the implementation of activity plans. (5) The US Fish and Wildlife Service recovery plans for the Colorado pikeminnow (1990), Humpback chub (1990), and razorback sucker (1998) all emphasize restoration of bottomland, backwater, and floodplain habitats to serve as fish nursery areas as a means of increasing juvenile recruitment in populations of these endangered species. (6) The recovery plain for the southwestern willow flycatcher (US Fish and Wildlife Service 2002) calls for habitat restoration efforts that "protect, reestablish, mimic, and/or mitigate for the loss of natural processes that establish, maintain, and recycle riparian ecosystems relevant to the flycatcher." Russian olives are a significant impediment to these natural processes and tend to displace the dense stands of willows and ecologically similar riparian shrubs that willow flycatchers depend on for breeding purposes. (7) The Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Roundtail Chub Gila robusta, Bluehead Sucker Catostomus discobolus, and Flannelmouth Sucker Catostomus latipinnes (UDWR Publication 06-18) includes an objective of enhancing and maintaining habitat for each of the three species. Restore altered channel and habitat features to conditions suitable for the three species. (8) The project addresses goals and objectives of the BLM Utah Riparian Policy, what states that "riparian areas are to be improved at every opportunity." (9) The Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) for the State of Utah identifies lowland riparian habitat as being highest priority for conservation and restoration. (10) San Juan County Weeds Plan seeks to treat 200 acres along the San Juan River. (11) Wildlife Action Plan 2015 A) Big Free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops macrotis) - The species often roosts and forms maternity colonies in massive sandstone cliffs near bodies of open water in a variety of habitats. It is presumed that big free-tailed bats migrate out of Utah for the winter. B) Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus discobolus) - Managed under a Utah and Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy intended to take voluntary actions to address threats and reduce the need to list the species. C) Colorado Pikeminnow (Ptchochelius lucius) -- Federally listed and managed under the Upper Colorado River and San Juan River Recovery Programs. D) Flannelmouth Sucker (Catostomus latipinnis) - Large, long-lived, migratory fish. * Managed under a Utah153 and Range-wide154 Conservation Agreement and Strategy intended to take voluntary actions to address threats and reduce the need to list the species. E) Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens) - Habitat restoration in wetlands and along riparian corridors. F) Razorback Sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) - Federally listed as endangered in 1991. Managed under the Upper Colorado River Recovery Program. G) Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta) - Managed under a Utah and Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy intended to take voluntary actions to address threats and reduce the need to list the species. H) Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax trailii extimus) - Populations declining due to altered water regimes, invasive plants, improper riparian grazing, development and nest parasitism. Manage and restore lowland riparian for suitable habitat. I) Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis) -- Prefers thick riparian vegetation communities with dense overstory of mature trees. Distribution and habitat use in the state are poorly understood. Most frequently found along the Green River near Vernal, near the town of Green River, and one portion of the San Juan River.
Fire / Fuels:
The town of Bluff sits adjacent to the historic floodplain of the San Juan River a large portion of which is now thick dead and dying tamarisk. Where there are cottonwoods Russian olive has filled in underneath creating ladder fuels into the cottonwood canopy adjacent to homes and businesses. A now defunct canal across the floodplain seasonally fills with water and has grown thick live Russian olive and tamarisk which are also adjacent to homes and businesses. In the last ten years there was a fire that started in the tamarisk and spread to the nearby motel that had tourists staying there. The San Juan Emergency Manager has expressed concern with the tamarisk in Bluff as have the Bluff Fire Chief. Plans to continue removal is being written into Bluff's CWPP currently. As Bluff continues to grow and see higher tourist visitation it will be important that fire prevention and mitigation is constantly being evaluated to protect the resources and people in Bluff. The San Juan River is a popular recreation area. Approximately 12,000 boaters, run, camp, and explore within the corridor each season. The proliferation of non-native above ground biomass and the subsequent accumulation of organic debris that tends to accompany the establishment of tamarisk and Russian olives, increases the likelihood of severe wildfires in floodplains. Litter from Russian olives is unusually resistant to decomposition, leading to accumulation of fuels in areas dominated by Russian olives. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Canyon Country Fire Zone (CYFZ) conducted an in depth landscape level burn probability analysis based on LandFire data sets and calibrated using a command line version of FlamMap called RANDIG. This fire modeling system was developed by Mark Finney at the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) and Allen Ager with the Western Wildland Threat Assessment Center. The CYFZ burn probability uses higher resolution based on 30 meter pixels and was calibrated at 90th percentile indices set to match conditions of recent large fires in the fire zone. The higher resolution and local calibration of this analysis helps delineate burn probability on long and narrow features, like the San Juan River, by decreasing the number of mixed pixels. The burn probability analysis shows that there is a significant threat of wildfire along the San Juan River corridor in the riparian zone. The wildfire threat has been exacerbated by the tamarisk beetle which has killed large stands of tamarisk during the past ten years. Semi-primitive camp sites are dispersed throughout the corridor placing recreationists directly within overgrown, continuous and often dead/dying stands of tamarisk and Russian olive. When these stands burn, fire behavior is of high intensity and is fast moving. Fires of this type have been observed to cross rivers resulting in a fairly large impact area placing the public at considerable risk. Native vegetation intermixed with the invasive species are also consumed during these events. The aggressive nature of the invasive and noxious species residing in the area results in secondary invasion of undesirable plants in the disturbed areas post fire. Native vegetation will be protected and enhanced due to decreased competition, reduced fuel loading, and a diminished chance of destructive fire. The Gold Mine/Tiger Wall Unit builds off of previous fuels work done by the BLM and further protects the highway 191 bridge and the Sand Island campground. This project addresses these threats by eradicating Russian olive and tamarisk in targeted areas and reducing the fuel loading within dispersed campsites or adjacent to them. These treatments will facilitate the spread of native vegetation and help preserve fluvial processes that maintain seasonally inundated areas and higher soil moisture levels.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Russian olives have displaced native vegetation and altered ecosystem processes through high levels of nitrogen fixation, high inputs of organic debris (roughly 25 times higher than ecologically similar native vegetation), and input of decay-resistant leaf litter that interferes with aquatic nutrient cycling (Katz and Shafroth 2003. Wetlands 23:763-777; Mineau et al. 2012. Ecology 93:1501-1508). Russian olives tend to degrade water quality by increasing the input of nitrogen and carbon in aquatic ecosystems. The elevated nitrogen levels favor processes that alter productivity and reduce dissolved oxygen levels in aquatic ecosystems. In addition, the high input of decay-resistant litter from Russian olives tends to cause accumulation of organic material and sediment that can restrict the flow of water or divert it to other areas. A major objective of this project is to improve the quantity and quality of water by decreasing evapotranspiration of woody invasive plants, maintaining side channel function, and by reducing inputs of nitrogen laden debris into the system. The San Juan River and adjacent tributaries are 303d listed waters with metal and dissolved oxygen concerns. Reductions in Russian olive and associated litter decomposition will help mitigate dissolved oxygen issues. It is unclear if Russian olive uptakes heavy metals and whether removal will reduce heavy metals in the river.
Compliance:
NEPA, Section 7 Consultation, and Archaeological clearances are completed for this project including work at the Gold Mine Site (county and youth corps) and the San Juan River Mexican Hat to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (youth corps). A Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) was completed and is tiered to the Programmatic Environmental Assessment Integrated Invasive Plant management Plan for the Monticello Field Office, DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2013-006-EA. Implementation will occur outside of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher and Yellow-Billed cuckoo nesting season (May 1- Aug 31). (1) Programmatic Environmental Assessment Integrated Invasive Plant management Plan for the Monticello Field Office, DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2013-006-EA. This programmatic EA was tiered to Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on Bureau of Land Management Lands in 17 Western States -- Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) (USDI, 2007). The EA provided analysis for 100 acres of mechanical treatment and 4000 acres of herbicide treatments within riparian areas located within the MFO. BLM is implementing projects within these restrictions currently. Work will continue on this scale until further NEPA analysis can be completed to expand and enhance project capabilities. (2) Utah Noxious Weed Act, Rule R68-9. April 2012 The Utah Noxious Weed Act, in conjunction with San Juan County ordinances, state that it is the duty of every property owner to control and prevent the spread of noxious weeds on any land in their possession, or under their control, and shall serve as a warning that if they fail to comply with this notice, enforced weed control measures may be imposed at the direction of county authorities (Rule R68-9, 2012). (3) Endangered Species Act (ESA), 1973, as amended. (4) Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1927), as amended. Seasonal bird restrictions will be followed. (5) Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 1958 Section 7 consultation was accomplished as part of the required NEPA process. All activities will be conducted outside of nesting and breeding seasons unless site specific surveys determine that work can proceed without impact to protected species. Project implementation will be phased and designed in such a way that critical habitat will not be detrimentally impacted. (6) Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 1966, as amended Site specific cultural inventory will be conducted if deemed necessary by Agency archaeologists. Treatment units will be designed to accommodate these values. Tribal consultation was conducted as part of the NEPA process prior to project implementation. NOTE: Our archaeologist is reviewing the polygons for any potential conflicts but expects little conflict or mitigation. Arch sites have a low probability of occurrence within current or historic floodplains due to the nature of flood scour/deposition. (7) Monticello Pesticide Use Proposal (PUP) No. 2013-UTY020-01-P The Monticello PUP provides guidance for herbicide application within the field office. All guidance, restrictions, and best management practices will be followed. (8) The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) is the basic authority for BLM activities. FLPMA establishes the principle that public lands be retained in Federal ownership and provides for the management, protection, development, and enhancement of the public lands under the principles of multiple use, sustained development, and sustained yield.
Methods:
1) San Juan River Gold Mine Site (46 Acres) - SEE IMAGES/DOCS for more detailed Statement of Work. This project area is divided into six separate units totaling 46 acres and is located approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the San Juan River Highway 191 river bridge east of Bluff and across from the Tiger Wall on river right. The site can be accessed by driving around and past the Bluff airport south of Highway 163. The site contains three seasonally inundated side channel habitats one of which runs approximately 840 meters. The work will be completed in phases. The first phase is to kill Russian olive using a frill cut/herbicide treatment. Once the root systems are dead many of the trees will be removed using a whole-tree extraction method and subsequent burning. However, the whole-tree extraction method cannot be implemented until the root systems are completely dead. Any living roots left within the top three inches of the soil surface will resprout vigorously. Frill cutting was completed by the Canyon Country Youth Corps (CCYC) on 7 acres in the spring of 2018 (see Unit 1 on map). Many trees were killed while some were top-killed but re-sprouted from the root crown. The re-sprouts were retreated in the fall of 2018 using a combination basal bark/foliar spray in order to kill the root systems. In the fall of 2019, the previously treated acreage in Unit 1 was re-assessed and resprouts were addressed through additional frill cutting using a Triclopyr application as necessary to attempt to kill the root systems of these plants. The CCYC and Utah Conservation Corps (UCC) completed another 6 acres of new frill cutting in Unit 2, along and adjacent to the long side channel working towards the upstream end. Work in Unit 3 will be the focus of this proposal (See Map). 2) San Juan River Mexican Hat to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (21 Acres). SEE IMAGES/DOCS for more detailed Statement of Work. This project area is divided into 33 separate non-contiguous units totaling 21 acres and is located on river right approximately 1.4 miles downstream of the Mexican Hat Boat Ramp past the San Juan Inn and river bridge. The site can be accessed by acquiring a lower San Juan River permit and launching rafts at the Mexican Hat Boat Ramp and floating down to the sites. Under San Juan 2.0, a cut-stump and herbicide treatment was completed on Unit 1, 2, and part of 3 in 2018 (see map, 2.1 acres) and treatment of the remaining 19 acres was finished in the Fall of 2019. The primary goal of the previous San Juan 2.0 project was the near complete eradiation of Russian olive on river right in this section by utilizing a cut-stump/lop-scatter (smaller trees) and a frill cut (for larger trees) treatment in order to protect native plant communities, promote native plant restoration, and slow the proliferation of Russian olive. Russian olive is scattered in small and isolated patches as compared to upriver. The focus of San Juan 3.0 will be on removing tamarisk within this reach. Work will begin sequentially by treating any Russian olive resprouts in these units with a basal bark/foliar technique. Once any re-sprouting is addressed, the priority is to implement new cut-stump/frill cutting activities progressing in sequential order downstream until all units have been treated. 3) Bluff Private Lands (112 Acres) -- SEE PDF MAP ATTACHED AS WRI4871_BluffPrivateLandsMethods Strip Mastication and Seeding (Purple Polygons) 78 Acres will be masticated in strips oriented east west and mechanically seeded with a UTV and pull behind cone seeder. Much of the area designated for strip mastication was previously subirrigated by a canal that runs through the floodplain. This allowed the tamarisk to grow, but now that the tamarisk beetle is present and the canal hasn't been run for at least 8 years most of the tamarisk is completely dead. The family that controls the water rights through the canal has no plans to use it in the future and so we are likely to continue to see decline of any remaining tamarisk on the site. Therefore we will not be applying herbicide after mastication. Even on neighboring BLM sites where herbicide was not sprayed after mastication the tamarisk has not grown enough to be interfering with the natives on site. We will be masticating in strips to allow for fire breaks and access into the tamarisk in case of fire. We are also doing this to allow for the best chance of native plant establishment in this area under the shade of the tamarisk that we leave. Full Mastication of Tamarisk (Red Polygons) 20 acres of tamarisk will be fully masticated and mechanically seeded with a UTV and pull behind cone seeder. This will expand on mastication performed over 5 years ago next to existing buildings. We want to expand the cleared area to give Bluff the best chance of surviving a fire coming off the riverside. Some of the masticated areas will be completely new treatment areas that haven't had any treatment adjacent to them. For the reasons stated in the last paragraph we will not be spraying herbicide for this treatment area unless deemed absolutely necessary. Russian Olive Clearing Under Cottonwoods (Turquoise Polygons) 14 Acres of Russian olive will be hand cut with Garlon herbicide application and material will be chipped and spread to reduce exotic annuals after disturbance. For the polygon closest to the town it consists of mostly medium sized Russian olive and removal will primarily be to protect the buildings closest to the floodplain. For the polygon on the river it is thick large Russian olive underneath cottonwoods and our goal is to reduce ladder fuels to protect the cottonwoods. We plan to expand clearings created around cottonwoods on the river side in future iterations of this project. Hand Thinning of Tamarisk (Green Polygon) 1.6 acres of tamarisk adjacent to the Kokopelli lodge will be thinned, chipped, and sprayed with Garlon. This stand of tamarisk partially burned a few years back and burned part of the Kokopelli lodge while the lodge was full. We want to reduce the fire intensity in case of future fire and establish natives within the stand. In future iterations of this project we want to completely remove the tamarisk in this area. We are not using machinery in here because there are old cars, sheds, and metal mixed in the tamarisk stand. All treatment areas on private lands will be mapped for knapweed, camelthorn, and Ravenna after treatments.
Monitoring:
Monitoring data and reports will be uploaded to the WRI database as completed and/or available through the BLM. 1) Gold Mine Site (46 Acres) Monitoring riparian condition and treatment effectiveness will be completed by using photopoints. his simple but effective strategy will show pre- and post-treatment riparian conditions, easily assess treatment effectiveness, and guide future management. Use of side channel habitat by fish and amphibians (fish/amphibian surveys) will be conducted at the project site to assess the effectiveness of the treatments and to guide future riparian habitat management efforts. To the extent possible, given the inherent challenges of sampling in large Russian olive monocultures, monitoring surveys will be conducted prior to the treatments, shortly after the treatments, and on an annual basis for several years after the treatments. In addition, photo points will be established to document long-term vegetative, side channel development, and floodplain trends. 2) San Juan River Mexican Hat to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (21 Acres) Monitoring riparian condition and treatment effectiveness will be completed by using photopoints. Russian olive in this section occurs in much smaller and isolated patches than upstream. This simple but effective strategy will show pre- and post-treatment riparian conditions, easily assess treatment effectiveness, and guide future management. 3) Bluff Private Lands (112 acres) Knapweed extent in addition to Ravenna and Camelthorn will be mapped in the treatment area to better understand the extent of exotic invasives and to come up with a long term management plan on the property. Photopoints will be established prior to removal efforts.
Partners:
(1) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Navajo fuels crew) Reserve Treaty Rights Trust Lands (RTRL) In previous iterations of this project, BLM has partnered with BIA to provide funding and project work for seasonal workers. The RTRL project treated units identified along the San Juan River. This work is directly tied in to this project lineage and is one piece of the puzzle to accomplish the goals and objectives of this undertaking. (2) Canyon Country Youth Corps - We have partnered with Canyon Country Youth Corps to implement the work from Mexican Hat to the park boundary and at the Gold Mine site. Work at both locations was completed in 2018. This work was funded through a cooperative agreement with BLM using BLM funds. (3) Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands -- This is the first year of the San Juan River Restoration project that FFSL will be involved, bringing in additional private lands to work on. FFSL will continue to look upstream at more private lands to restore as this project continues. (4) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources -- UDWR has provided BLM with a contract mechanism to achieve work on the ground. This partnership has worked very well in the past and will likely be utilized for some portions of this project. There are also several State of Utah sections that intersect the corridor. These may be considered for treatment as well to enhance overall project success. (5) San Juan River Restoration Partnership There have been initial discussions about setting up a San Juan River Restoration Partnership involving BLM, Youth Corps, Southwest Conservation Corps/Ancestral Lands, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, BIA, Navajo Nation, and others. Mapping the polygons that define the suite of potential treatment units was suggested prior to the formation of the group. BLM has recently accomplished this and plans to host a meeting in the summer of 2019 to discuss ways to collaborate further. (6) San Juan County San Juan County is under a weed spraying agreement to treat approximately 200 acres a year within the river corridor. I have been working with Monte Perkins, San Juan County Weed Supervisor, to develop work at San Juan Hill and Sand Island Ranger Station. (7) Bluff Volunteer Fire Department The Bluff Fire Department has helped to facilitate private landowner contact in order to get permission to do work on private lands. We hope to work with the fire department as we begin implementation for assistance and guidance.
Future Management:
1) San Juan Partnership and Collaboration. One future goal central to this project is to continue to work towards building a San Juan partnership. Many potential collaborators have been contacted this season and momentum is building. While not fully realized for this proposal the collaboration is likely to grow during the summer and be incorporated next round of proposals. Completed the action items in this proposal continues to showcase the need for and potential of this work and helps to build momentum. 2) Gold Mine Site (46 Acres) This site requires a multi-phase approach to side channel and riparian restoration. The current phase seeks to kill Russian olive using a frill cut treatment. The goal is to kill both the above ground and below ground (roots) biomass without cutting down the trees. In the future, once these trees are dead, the trees in and adjacent to the side-channels will be removed using whole-tree extraction. Removing the entire tree from crown to root systems, allows high water flows to scour and maintain these side channel habitats effectively restoring the natural hydrologic processes. Active and passive restoration potential will be evaluated once the trees are extracted and the site opened up. 3) San Juan River Mexican Hat to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (21 Acres) Future management will involve continued downstream progression in Russian olive removal. 4) Bluff Private Land (112 Acres) one private landowner that owns most of the riverside private property in Bluff has been incredibly active in the last few decades clearing tamarisk and maintaining native vegetation on his land. We hope to continue future phases of work with this landowner as well as offer guidance and assistance as future phases of work come to a close.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
1) Grazing Long-term impacts would be beneficial to the grazing permittee with treated areas providing enhanced forage production and improved vegetative diversity post treatment. This would be accomplished by removal of Tamarisk and Russian Olive trees that allows for increased growth of herbaceous plants (i.e. forage), providing a more reliable forage base, and promoting distribution of livestock by increasing access points to water. 2) Recreation Russian olive is a significant barrier to accessing dispersed campsites and its thorns provide significant risk of personal injury and puncturing inflatable watercraft. The removal of invasive species and restoration of native riparian vegetation improves access and the recreational experience of rafters and campers. In the town of Bluff the private land that we are working on is the only easy consistent access to the river. Opportunities for sustainable uses are therefore improved. 3) Fire/Fuels Completion of the proposed treatments would reduce fuel loads, and continuity of heavy fuels would decrease the potential for high-intensity and large-scale wildfire in closed-canopy Tamarisk and Olive stands. A severe wildland fire event could negatively affect livestock grazing throughout the allotments by reducing the amount of forage, and because it may require an emergency closure of the burn area to livestock grazing. Thereby, the project would reduce these risks and effects.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$264,033.00 $0.00 $264,033.00 $35,000.00 $299,033.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Archaeological Clearance FFSL - Archaeological clearance for 168 Acres at $32/Acre $5,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Equipment Rental/Use FFSL - Skidsteer Bullhog transport, fuel, repair, and labor costs for 46 acres of clearing at $625/Acre. $28,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services FFSL - Conservation Corps labor for 7 weeks on private lands in Bluff. $29,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) FFSL - Administration of project by permanent FFSL employee. $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (seasonal employee) FFSL - Seasonal fuels crew labor for clearing Russian olive on private lands, seeding in masticated areas, mapping herbaceous invasive populations and running FFSL chipper with conservation corps crews. $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Materials and Supplies FFSL - Herbicide and small incidental supplies (herbicide safety equipment etc.) $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Equipment Rental/Use FFSL - In-kind use of FFSL chipper and bullhog during Russian olive clearing operation. Chipper budgeted for 4 weeks at $1500/week. Bullhog budgeted for 2 weeks at $4000/week. $0.00 $0.00 $14,000.00 2021
Other FFSL - In-kind labor from landowner and volunteers in Bluff spraying knapweed, clearing Russian olive, and planting natives. $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2021
Contractual Services BLM - Youth Corps Raft Based Restoration on BLM Lands (Mexican Hat to GLCA) - Woody and herbaceous invasive species removal with youth corps crews. Two trips are scheduled. Each trip consists of 12 10-hour days with 15 youth corps crew members. $76,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Materials and Supplies BLM Supplied- Funds to purchase herbicide for work at the Gold Mine Site (youth corps), San River Below Mexican Hat (youth corps - River Right) $0.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 2021
Contractual Services BLM - Youth Corps Vehicle Based Restoration Activities on BLM Lands (Gold Mine Side Channel Restoration) - Woody and herbaceous invasive species removal with youth corps crews. Three trips consisting of 8 10-hour days with 15 youth corps crew members. $76,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services FFSL - Knapweed spraying via contracted crew. Rate at $335/acre quote from Grand County Weeds for 46 acres $15,410.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Seed (GBRC) FFSL - Seed for private lands in Bluff $6,247.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) BLM - Project management and coordination by BLM Aquatic Habitats Staff: project implementation, monitoring, staff capacity and travel expenses. Pre-work meetings, herbicide, and logistical support of Conservation Corps. $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$148,750.00 $0.00 $148,750.00 $35,000.00 $183,750.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands (FFSL) $0.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 2021
BLM Fuels (Canyon Country) A089 $100k - New GNA base agreement $417 - RF $100,417.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
BLM (Aquatics) A100 $15,000 - New GNA base agreement $33,333 - Mod 3 $48,333.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Herbicide from BLM inventory $0.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 2020
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) BLM - Project management and coordination by BLM Aquatic Habitats Staff: project implementation, monitoring, staff capacity and travel expenses. Pre-work meetings, herbicide, and logistical support of Conservation Corps. $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bluehead Sucker N4
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Low
Bluehead Sucker N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Bluehead Sucker N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Bluehead Sucker N4
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Colorado Pikeminnow N1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Low
Colorado Pikeminnow N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Colorado Pikeminnow N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Colorado Pikeminnow N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Low
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Low
Razorback Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Low
Razorback Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Razorback Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Razorback Sucker N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Roundtail Chub N3
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Low
Roundtail Chub N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Roundtail Chub N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Roundtail Chub N3
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo N3
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo N3
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Wetland High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Camping (Dispersed) Low
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Project Comments
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Gibson
Hi Gabe, I'm just wondering about the thinking on the inclusion of Big free-tailed bats on the species list? They are certainly present in the area, and I suppose the argument could be made that creation and opening up of backwater areas would benefit them (though I'm not sure the impact would be too great with all the open water available in the main channel). If that's the thinking, perhaps add a quick blurb about that in the objectives? Thanks.
Comment 02/19/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Gabriel Bissonette
Hi Scott, The restoration of backwater areas and subsequently increasing the insect population (hopefully the moths they eat) is the rationale. I agree, these positive benefits are minor given the amount of open water nearby. I'll go ahead and remove it from the proposal since the benefit is more coincidental than a primary focus of the project. Thanks for the feedback.
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Lots of T&E species as well as other sensitive species could benefit from long term riparian health. Great project.
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Gabriel Bissonette
Thanks Clint. I'm trying to focus on projects like these that have real tangible benefits to a variety of special status species.
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Robbie Wood
Hi Gabe, Im noticing in the project details you list off a in-text citation which I was curious to look at the paper it was from. (Belliston, et. al., 2010) is the one i was curious as to reading. Im wondering if I overlooked a "reference" page.
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Gabriel Bissonette
Hi Robbie...you can find the reference here: http://digitallibrary.utah.gov/awweb/awarchive?type=file&item=62671
Comment 08/16/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
Thank you for submitting your completion form on time. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please verify the shapefile acres match the completion report. The current shapefile has 771 acres of herbicide application/Manual removal/hand crew, but could not tell from the completion report that this many treatment acres occurred. When you have completed that please go back to the Completion Form and finalize your report again so I know that it has been completed. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
07/01/2020
End Date:
06/30/2021
FY Implemented:
2021
Final Methods:
A variety of methods were utilized on the San Juan River to meet the riparian, wildlife habitat, and side channel restoration objectives. Specifically, Russian olive frill and cut-stump treatments, Russian olive re-sprout work to maintain previous restoration efforts, hand pulling of Russian olive seedlings, mastication of previously frill cut trees, Ravenna and Arundo treatments, vegetation monitoring, and mapping of invasive weeds and vegetation monitoring. Restoration is rarely immediately recognized, and therefore the ability to implement monitoring and maintenance is a critical component to the success of this project. Site-specific treatment methods are as follows: 1) GOLD MINE SITE - RIPARIAN AND SIDE CHANNEL RESTORATION The Canyon Country Youth Corps (CCYC) and the Utah Conservation Corps (UCC) completed frill cutting of Russian olive on 13 acres at the Gold Mine Site in September and October of 2020 (See UCC Report). Follow-up resprout treatments on 10.2 acres were also completed at this time using additional frill cuts and/or lopping small resprouts and brushing herbicide on the exposed cambium. In March of 2021, the Canyon Country Youth Corps implemented and refined hand pulling techniques for Russian olive seedlings germinating from the seed bank clearing approximately 3 acres (see attached CCYC report) using weed wrenches, shovels, and other hand tools. CCYC also established monitoring plots to evaluate treatment success (see CCYC report). The BLM Canyon Country Fuels program employed a selective cut using the mini-bullhog on dead frill cut trees to open up 0.75 acres of riparian habitat freeing native plants from competition. The following USU Extension instructions were followed for this frill cut treatment: a) Frill cuts are made with a hatchet or ax in the lower trunk area of the tree. b) Chop through the bark, into the sapwood at a slightly downward angle so the frill cut will hold the chemical. c) The number of frill cuts will depend on the size of the tree. One frill per inch of trunk diameter will allow 1 milliliter (1 ml) of chemical to be applied into each frill cut (1 ml = 1 cc). d) The frill cuts must go around the stem. However, care must be taken to not girdle the tree. Girdling severs the phloem all around the stem and stops the flow of plant food from the leaves to the roots. Staggered frill cuts will allow the tree to continue growing and move the chemical through the system. e) Trees with multiple stems must have each stem treated individually. Untreated stems will survive. f) Any Russian Olive present over 4 inches in the Riparian Zone can be Frill Cut/Hack & Squirt g) Russian Olive under 4 inches must still be low-stumped within 1 inch and herbicide applied. 2) SAN JUAN RIVER -- SAND ISLAND TO MEXICAN HAT (River Right) Continued work on the lower San Juan during the fall of 2020 was suspended due to hazardous low water conditions at Government Rapid. CCYC and UCC crews were rerouted to mapping Ravenna, Arundo, and Camelthorn and treating Ravenna and Arundo when encountered on 771 acres of BLM within the Sand Island to Mexican Hat section between September 25-30. Weed locations were mapped and submitted to the BLM (See CCYC Report). The crews employed manual and chemical treatment methods. The teams set out to clip and bag Ravenna grass seed heads, and remove their rhizomes from the riverbank. The same manual approach was used to remove and bag Arundo seedheads, however a cut-stump treatment with AquaNeat was used to cause mortality. 3) SAN JUAN RIVER - MEXICAN HAT TO GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (River Right) In June of 2021, the BLM, CCYC, and UCC rafted down the lower San Juan to assess the condition of the previously treated 21 acres and to map Ravenna, Arundo, and Russian olive. The Mexican Hat to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area was the primary focus. Data was collected using ArcGIS Field Maps and uploaded to the project webmap. These data will be used for planning future projects and collaboration. The trip was funded with in-kind dollars.
Project Narrative:
The FFSL portion of this project on private land in Bluff was not funded and therefore not executed. The project was completed through collaboration between the BLM Canyon Country District Aquatic Habitats program, the Canyon Country Youth Corps, Utah Conservation Corps, Canyon Country Fuels Program, Forestry, Fire, and State Lands, and UDWR/WRI. The strength and efficiency of this collaboration have increased over the last few phases of the project. We hope to showcase our work and bring in other collaborators in the future. This phase of the project focused on treating Russian olive, Arundo, Ravenna, and on mapping weed infestations outside of the current project footprint. We completed initial treatment on 13 acres, with follow-up resprout work in 10.2 acres, hand pulling of seedlings on 3.2 acres, mastication on 0.75 acres, mapping and removal of Ravenna and Arundo from Sand Island to Mexican Hat, and mapping of Ravenna grass, Arundo, and Russian olive on the lower San Juan. 1) GOLD MINE SITE - RIPARIAN AND SIDE CHANNEL RESTORATION Significant progress was made in causing woody invasive mortality within the dominant and lesser side channel habitat and surrounding the cottonwood galleries at the Gold Mine Site. This site is dominated by a very high density of large Russian olives which required considerable effort for every acre of work completed. In September and October of 2020, initial treatment on 13 acres, with follow-up resprout work in 10.2 acres was completed by CCYC and UCC crews. Two CCYC crews spent approximately 22 days at the site and one UCC crew spent 16 days on site. Resprout treatments went relatively quickly because of high mortality rates from previous frill cutting treatments. One season of resprout treatments following initial frill cutting seems to be effective in achieving high mortality rates. Mastication focused on the most accessible downstream area at the Gold Mine Site, targeting dead Russian olive previously treated by frill cutting. We are testing the hypothesis that killing Russian olive root systems through frill cutting prior to mastication or whole-tree extraction, leads to greater treatment efficiency and reduced use of herbicide because less resprouting and intensive follow up treatment is needed. Native shrubs exhibited strong growth response following the removal and/or mortality of Russian olive (see photos). Russian olive chips appear to minimize the germination of Russian olive seedlings. However, Russian olive seedlings had germinated prolifically within the previously treated (not masticated) frill cut areas that exhibited high mortality and defoliated overstory canopies. Funds earmarked for the cancelled lower San Juan work trip (see below) were used to fund hand pulling of Russian olive seedlings. This proved to be an effective option achieving nearly 100% mortality without the use of herbicide (see CCYC report). Minimal and targeted use of herbicide within the active floodplain is a primary objective of this project. This area is ready for seeding in the fall of 2021. 2) SAN JUAN RIVER -- SAND ISLAND TO MEXICAN HAT (River Right) Funds earmarked for work on the lower San Juan were rerouted to efforts on the Sand Island to Mexican Hat section of the river due to dangerous low water conditions at Government Rapid. Specifically, the risk associated with transporting herbicide, chainsaws, and crew through the rapid was too high. The CCYC and UCC crews were deployed on a mission to map Arundo, Ravenna, and camelthorn, while treating Arundo and Ravenna when encountered on approximately 771 acres of BLM. The 5 day trip was successful in mapping these weeds. A few populations of Ravenna were identified and treated by removing seedheads and rhizomes from the streambank. A couple Arundo populations were also found and treated by removing seedheads and employing a cut-stump treatment and AquaNeat herbicide application. The mission showed that both Arundo and Ravenna grass are not yet prevalent in this section of the San Juan River and an early detection rapid response (EDRR) is the best approach. Camelthorn is widely distributed. 3) SAN JUAN RIVER - MEXICAN HAT TO GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (River Right) Raft-based restoration work on the lower San Juan was not feasible due to the dangerous low water conditions previously mentioned. A recon, mapping, and collaboration trip was launched using in-kind funds. We assessed the condition of the 23 previously treated acres covering 6 miles of the right bank of the San Juan River. A few straggling Russian olive remain but far less than outside of the treated area. Arundo, Ravenna grass, and Russian olive were completely mapped in this section to assist in planning future phases and cross-agency collaboration. Data were collected using ArcGIS Field Maps and uploaded to a project webmap. Flows were approximately 600 cfs at Government Rapid and 528 cfs during the last day from Trimble camp to the Clay Hills Takeout. We confirmed that 600 cfs is too low for future restoration trips involving large boats and herbicide transport.
Future Management:
Building collaboration on the San Juan River to improve restoration outcomes at a watershed level and across administrative boundaries is a focus moving forward. 1) GOLD MINE SITE - RIPARIAN AND SIDE CHANNEL RESTORATION San Juan 4.0 will focus on re-treating frill cut treatments from San Juan 3.0, if needed. Cut-stump treatments and hand piling of previously frill cut trees will be undertaken around the cottonwood gallery and around native shrubs to reduce competition and ladder fuels. It's hoped that the combination of frill cutting and subsequent cut-stump treatments will result in complete mortality of the tree with no resprouting. Piles will be masticated in the future. Russian olive seedlings will be handpulled focusing on new areas adjacent to the greater side channel. New and old handpulled areas will be seeded with a native seed mix including grasses and flowering forbs. Russian olive in seeded areas will be masticated using a mosaic selective-cut approach that leaves 20-30% of dead standing Russian olive. The combination of chips and leave trees should provide for greater soil moisture longer into the season. 2) SAN JUAN RIVER -- SAND ISLAND TO MEXICAN HAT (River Right) & MEXICAN HAT TO GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (River Right) A small amount of isolated Russian olive resprout work will be undertaken in future phases. However, the primary focus will shift towards planning new removal within the next 6 miles downstream from the original 6 miles of work.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
10540 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
10540 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
10541 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
10541 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
10542 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
10543 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
10543 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
10544 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
10544 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Mechanical removal
10545 Affected Area
Project Map
Project Map