Beaver project trapping expense fund Phase II
Project ID: 4935
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 46
Project Manager: Kent Sorenson
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Northern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
We have several beaver projects in the northern region and, in fact, statewide. Providing a small pool from which to draw payment to trained trappers willing to capture problem (depredation) beavers live instead of lethally removing them would provide us with the number of animals needed to insure success at project locations.
Location:
UDWR Northern Region, UT
Project Need
Need For Project:
There are several projects underway in the Northern Region that utilize beaver as a restoration agent (these include Trail Hollow, Three Mile Creek, Richards Hollow in Cache County and Sugar Pine, Peggy Hollow in Rich County and the Raft River and Tribs in Box Elder County). Under the previous version of the UDWR Beaver Management Plan, freedom to translocate beavers was greatly restricted. With the new version of the plan, many of the previous impediments have been removed. We now, however find ourselves in a 'backlog' situation with many more projects needing animals than can be provided with internal (agency) personnel. This proposal would provide a pool of money to pay trappers providing nuisance beaver removal for removing them alive versus the previously mandated lethal removal. Those beavers could then be quarantined and relocated to project areas. With USU now having a secure quarantine facility capable of holding numerous beavers we would not be limited to only taking opportunistic single animals, but capturing significant numbers and holding until whole colonies can be moved.
Objectives:
Due to a vast underestimate of costs per beaver experienced in FY19, I am proposing that we grow this project monetarily to continue the practice of removing beavers from nuisance areas and relocate them to projects in the Northern Region. These locations could easily receive that many animals and greatly reduce the need for human intervention currently being utilized for the maintenance of the structures. We have Beaver Dam Analogues in many of these locations, but without maintenance, they will quickly deteriorate and become non-functional. We are currently expanding BDA project areas and the need for beavers in those areas is increasing concurrently.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The primary threat is the loss of the project labor and planning involved in the projects already underway and/or completed. They were generally all designed to have beavers introduced at some point and now with the more favorable Beaver Management Plan, that is possible.
Relation To Management Plan:
UDWR Beaver Management Plan WAP Ch. 7-1; Mountain Riparian Habitat, criteria and score totals (ch. 7-8) 3rd highest priority statewide. Ch. 6-53; Yellowstone Cutthroat trout; general conservation actions - restore degraded habitats, priority high. Ch. 6-15; Western Toad; threat - OHV and improper grazing; provide habitat protection where needed, priority high. Ch. 6-27; Greater Sage Grouse; Threats - habitat loss; identify and enhance degraded habitats, priority high. Establish local working groups (BARM). BARM (Box Elder Adaptive Resource Management Working Group) pg. 43 - control noxious weed populations, replace with beneficial vegetation pg. 58 (3.3) identify and implement riparian habitat projects Within 2011 Sage Grouse Initiative Priority map as a high value lek area. UDWR Beaver Management Plan - Pg.25 - Basin Creek drainage - Transplant site. Yellowstone cutthroat rangewide agreement - maintain and/or re-establish populations of Yellowstone Cutthroat trout within historic range. UDWR Hydrologic Unit mgt. plan - pg. 13; maintain or enhance the six populations of Yellowstone Cutthroat in the Raft River Drainage - Pg. 13, maintain population of Western Toad in the Raft River Drainage
Fire / Fuels:
Healthy riparian zones and associated healthy wet meadow complexes created by beaver activity are quite effective fire breaks.
Water Quality/Quantity:
It is hoped that with the re-introduction of beavers into the systems needing them, perennial flows will again be established much further downstream in the drainages and the flows of ephemeral streams will be temporally extended longer into the growing season. Capture of sediment in the dams themselves will reduce suspended solids transported downstream.
Compliance:
n/a
Methods:
Train a pool of interested trappers to live capture beavers where they would normally lethally remove them. Pay the trappers a fee to cover costs and for live capture and delivery to a holding facility at USU.
Monitoring:
Periodic survey to monitor status of yellowstone cutthroat trout (Raft River Site); observations by district biologist to document sage grouse use. Observe area for active beaver activity. Monitor riparian vegetation for shift away from weed communities to riparian vegetative communities Basically, all of these monitoring efforts are being undertaken within their own project headings, but having beavers actually on site will allow documentation of enhanced recovery tempo. Often site visits documenting presence/absence of new beaver activity in areas of transplant is sufficient to document use.
Partners:
USFS, USU, BLM
Future Management:
We will determine if the interest is present and viable for any future efforts of duplication of this project.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Increased riparian zone forage for re-establishment of wet meadows. Improved water quality and quantity.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$20,000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Payment to trapper for live capture and associated expenses incurred as well as delivery of live beaver(s) to holding facility at USU. $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$20,000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Habitat Council Account QHCR $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American Beaver
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Medium
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) Medium
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures High
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native High
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes High
Habitats
Habitat
Mountain Meadow
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Unknown
Project Comments
Comment 01/16/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Taylor Payne
Would it be good to mentione this project in the BDA application as well?
Comment 01/22/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kent Sorenson
Well, I purposely kept them separate for now even though they will likely run parallel paths and often be used together. with the uncertainty within Water Rights about BDAs and their use, I wanted to make sure we still had a mechanism to use trapped beavers for translocation even if BDAs were not allowed.
Comment 01/18/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Hill
This would be very helpful in getting beavers relocated.
Comment 01/22/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kent Sorenson
I agree, and with how fast the money went in the pilot project last year, and how much better we are getting at trapping, I think this will be very well utilized.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Kent - This project is still in Draft. Did you mean to submit it last week?
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 2 Commenter: Kent Sorenson
Thanks for the nudge Alison!
Comment 08/24/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 08/28/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please give some more details in the Completion Form about this project so anyone reading the report can understand the who, what, when, why, how, etc. of the project without needing to read the entire proposal. How many beaver were trapped and moved? Why is this project needed? etc.
Comment 09/03/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thanks for making those corrections. I have moved this project to completed.
Completion
Start Date:
07/01/2019
End Date:
06/24/2020
FY Implemented:
2020
Final Methods:
we paid vendors for their expenses incurred while trapping, transporting, and holding beavers to be released as restoration agents. Trapping, holding and transporting activities for beavers in the northern region can each have their own 'bottleneck' elements. Enrolling USU and their associated personnel as a partner has been a force multiplier allowing me to move over 20 beavers to areas where stream restoration and wet meadow enhancement are needed.
Project Narrative:
Billing is rather cumbersome as we seem to be making this up as we go. Several partners create flexibility but it's difficult for me to keep track of all the moving parts. It seems to work as long as I initiate communication and keep up with it. It's a far better system than me attempting to do it solo. The holding facility at USU has become indispensable. It seems that I have estimated the budget better this year; with about half of the budget remaining, we concluded captures for the first half of the fiscal year. I think the budget should be spent to within $800 of total.
Future Management:
Continue to refine and streamline the process. Make additional attempts to enroll recreational trappers and nuisance trappers into the live capture program. More entities are now calling me/USU for nuisance beavers; these would normally be funneled directly to the overworked Landowner Assistance Program in the northern region. 'Word of mouth advertising' is finally beginning to show fruits.
Map Features
N/A
Project Map
N/A