Alma Taylor Timber Stand Improvement and Meadow Restoration
Project ID: 4980
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 939
Project Manager: Ryan Mower
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Ashley National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
This project includes a variety vegetation and other terrestrial treatments. The treatment includes pre-commercial thinning of lodgepole pine, clearcutting of lodgepole pine, and restoration of a alpine wet meadow.
Location:
The proposed area is in the Vernal Ranger District on the Ashley National Forest approximately 30 miles north of Vernal, UT.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Alma Taylor Timber Stand Improvement and Meadow Restoration will improve forest ecosystems health, including vegetation and wildlife habitat improvement, and result in reducing the risk of catastrophic fire. the project is located within a UPCD primary focus area and in an area of high restoration interest for multiple resource uses. The intent of the project is to improve the resilience and adaptive capacity of lodgepole pine stands, reducing high stand densities and remove dwarf mistletoe infected trees where possible. The thinning will provide additional passage and forage for wildlife, as well as reduce the risk of potentially destructive wildfire bybreaking up fuel continuity. The wet meadow around Alma Taylor Lake has been significantly damaged due to unauthorized motorized access. The meadow will be restored and ongoing access will be prevented.
Objectives:
1.Maintain or promote tree vigor and form in young stands to minimize the future impacts of biotic (e.g.,mistletoe and bark beetles) and abiotic damage (e.g., snow damage and windthrow) by managing stand densities. 2.Improve the resilience and adaptive capacity of the project area by managing stand densities. 3.Promote the development of large trees. 4.Reduce the risk of large scale, stand replacing, catastrophic wildfires. 5.Protect Ashley Valley municipal watershed values. 6.Reduce overall fuel loading in the project area to promote firefighter and public safety 7.Improve summer range habitat for mule deer. 8.Increase ground cover and foraging habitat for small mammals 9.Improve Elk habitat across the treatment area 10. Restore wet meadow properties and rehabilitate hydrologic connectivity to protect and hopefully enhance Alma Taylor Lake.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If left untreated, the trees in the younglodgepole stands will continue the self-pruning process, growth rates of trees will gradually become slower,and the understory vegetation will decline. This would make the area less desirable to most wildlife species.If left untreated, these trees will develop structurally weak form and their resiliency and adaptive capacity will decline. At the present time, many of these trees are at an ideal stage for thinning. If treatment is delayed,stands may become more stagnant and less likely to produce the desired response.Many thousands of acres on the Ashley National Forest have been impacted by mountain pine beetle in recent years. Most or all of the large lodgepole pines have been killed in these areas. Large tree development in the project area will be delayed, and may even be impossible without incorporating some form of density management treatment into the overall management strategy of these areas. Without intervention, the area will continue to decline in value for most wildlife species. Overall forage values will remain minimal, and the density of the stands will not allow for most wildlife passage and use. The current state of the treatment area posses a high risk for high intensity stand replacing fires. The areas where group selection (clear-cuts) will occur are areas overrun with dwarf mistletoe. The treatment will hopefully eliminate, but definitely inhibit spread of the disease. Also the group selection areas contain some aspen. Aspen will be cut to encourage aspen regeneration in these areas. The wetland meadow located in the project area is already beginning to lose vegetation and the hydrologic connectivity has been lost. Historical images show that Alma Taylor Lake was larger, it is assumed that the compacted soils in the meadow are preventing full hydrologic connectivity decreasing the overall water supply to the lake. This may lead to the desiccation of the lake which is a vital source for wildlife, livestock, and recreation. The project will also rehabilitate the damaged meadow.
Relation To Management Plan:
This project will assist in accomplishing the following goals, objectives, and strategies as outlined in the following management plans and assessments. Note: mule deer, elk, and northern goshawk are all Forest management indicator species and the northern goshawk is listed as a Forest sensitive species. ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST PLAN (pg IV-28, IV-30) Wildlife and Fish -Goal 1: Manage fish and wildlife habitat to maintain or improve diversity and productivity. (reduce sediment runoff) -Objective 1: Develop and Implement habitat management plan that will include key ecosystems and maintain habitat for supporting T&E or sensitive plants and animal species and management indicator species. (increasing stand structure) -Objective 3: Manage the habitat of all T&E or sensitive plant and animal species to maintain or enhance their status. (increasing stand structure) ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST PLAN AMENDMENT -- Utah Northern Goshawk Project (page cc-1) - Goal 3: Restore or maintain forested landscapes in a properly functioning condition. (reducing stand densities) Functioning forested landscapes provide habitat for the northern goshawk and its prey to support a viable population of goshawks in. (Providing habitat for pray) Utah CONSERVATION STRATEGY AND AGREEMENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NORTHERN GOSHAWK HABITAT IN UTAH (page 6) -Goal: Provide habitat capable of sustaining viable populations of goshawk in the state of Utah. (increasing diversity in stand structure across the treatment area) -Objective 1: Design a proactive approach to habitat management that will result in the long term conservation and management of habitat for goshawk, its prey and other associated species. ( Thinned stands will develop into large mature trees providing nesting trees) Desired Habitat Condition (DHC) - 1) Diverse forest cover types with strong representation of early seral tree species dominate the landscape. (Thinning will reduce competition for resources favoring seral species) - 3) Forested landscapes have 40% of the area dominated by large trees, well distributed. (Thinning is necessary to reduce stand densities to achieve larger diameter trees) UTAH STATEWIDE ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN (Sec. VI Pages 12-13) -Population Management Goal: Maintain healthy elk populations throughout the state that are managed within habitat capabilities and in consideration of other land uses. (enhancing habitat) -Population Objective 1: Seek opportunities to increase population objectives in individual elk unit management plans to attain a total statewide population objective of 80,000 elk, ensuring that any increases will be subject to an analysis of the impacts to habitat, landowners, livestock operators, and/or mule deer populations. Strategies: - c) Support objectives and strategies in this plan to protect elk habitat and mitigate losses. - d) Support habitat improvement projects that increase forage for both big game and livestock. UTAH STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MULE DEER (Sec. VI Pages 10-11) - Population Management Goal: Expand and improve mule deer populations throughout the state within the carrying capacity of available habitats and in consideration of other land uses. - Population Objective: By 2013, increase the statewide mule deer population by 50,000 to an estimated postseason herd size of 350,000. Strategies: - b) Support all habitat objectives and strategies in this plan to protect and improve mule deer habitat including energy development mitigation in crucial mule deer habitat. NORTH AMERICAN MULE DEER CONSERVATION PLAN (Pages 6-7) Habitat Goal: - Mule deer habitat potential is optimized for quality and quantity across mule deer range. Objective 2: Restore or improve mule deer habitat function throughout mule deer range. Strategy a: Proactively manage shrub communities to maintain mosaics of uneven aged stands to enhance habitat conditions for mule deer. BOREAL TOAD CONSERVATION PLAN 3.9.3 Create, restore, and maintain new habitats through water management. 3.9.3.b Deepen impoundments to maintain sufficient water levels through metamorphosis. The Alma Taylor area appears to occur in "substantial value habitat" Accessed https://dwrcdc.nr.utah.gov/rsgis2/Search/Map.asp?Id=111 . Golden Eagle Utah WAP states" Northern Great Basin and Book Cliffs nesting areas in Utah have been monitored for many years, with apparent breeding declines associated with fire, shrub loss and jackrabbit declines in the Great Basin area" According to https://dwrcdc.nr.utah.gov/rsgis2/Search/Map.asp?Id=154 this habitat is either Critical or High value for Golden Eagle. Uintah County Resource Management Plan Use active and adaptive forest management to improve forest health and support multiple use and sustained yield with emphasis on employment, forest product production, open space, wildlife habitat, forage, recreation,and other social and economic benefits. Manage forest resources to reduce the risk of catastrophic fires, which cause unacceptable harm to resources and assets valued by society, including ecosystem and community health and resilience. State of Utah Resource Management Plan Forest Encourage timber harvesting to prevent fuel load and biomass buildup. Fire The State will advocate for forest management practices that promote species diversity and overall ecosystem health. Wetlands The State supports using a combination of active water management where necessary (e.g., Great Salt Lake) and maintaining or restoring natural hydrology when possible to support wildlife habitat and healthy functioning of aquatic ecosystems.
Fire / Fuels:
There is a need to reduce the overall fuel loading in the project area to reduce the risk of large, stand replacing, high-intensity fires. These large scale fires have a detrimental impact on municipal watersheds from sediment runoff. The reduction in fuels will also benefit the community of Dry Fork by providing structure that can be safely managed in the event of a fire. The thinning of these dense stands will break up fuel continuity and reduce overall bulk density of the stand reducing the likelihood of these high-intensity stand replacing fires. This area receives high amounts of dispersed camping that would be negatively impacted if a large scale fire should occur. This project would also reduce the likelihood of critical wildlife habitat being lost from large scale fires by reducing fuel loading in the area. Alma Taylor Lake would be protected and hopefully enhanced providing a water supply for fire fighters, should the need arise.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Dense stands prevent snow and moisture from reaching the forest floor which then can be lost through evaporation and sublimation. The thinning of these dense stands will increase the amount of moisture reaching the forest floor resulting in increased water availability on the site as well as increase water runoff. The decrease is fuel load could greatly increase water quality in the event of a wildfire by decreasing the fuel load the risk of hydrophobic soils would be significantly reduced. The meadow restoration would improve local water quality by reducing overland flow, providing a more robust vegetative barrier to Alma Taylor Lake, and restore subsurface flows. Quantity would be augmented by encouraging soil intake and storage to either be used by vegetation of stored for late season inflow to the lake.
Compliance:
NEPA has been completed including archaeological clearances.
Methods:
The project includes the mechanical thinning treatment of lodgepole pine stands to increase long-term forest health and improve wildlife habitat of the area. Implementation of the treatments will be accomplished with a contract crew using chainsaws to cut unwanted trees and to buck and lop the slash. This proposal includes precommercial thinning of up to 1000 acres in young lodgepole pine stands; approximately 300 to 360 trees per acre would be maintained. This is roughly 11 to 12 foot spacing. Slash will be lopped and scattered. The project also includes the cutting, skidding, and decking of 70 to 150 acres of timber which would be sold to the public. The wet meadow restoration would include obliteration of compacted soils to restore hydrologic connectivity. If possible sedge plugs will be harvest and planted the obliterated soil to increase vegetation response time. Temporary electric fencing may be utilized if grazing proves detrimental to restoration. After meadow restoration has been completed barrier rock will be placed at the end of the authorized route to prevent damage any future damage.
Monitoring:
Continued monitoring will occur in the project area and will be utilized to change/alter management strategy if required to meet objectives. The Forest Service has vegetative study sites throughout the project area. Each of these sites will be reviewed every 3-5 years to assess the vegetative cover and species abundance. Photo points will also be placed in the treatment areas to monitor changes over time. Monitoring of the timber stand will also determine when future timber harvest occurs in the project area. Northern Goshawk territories occur adjacent to this project and nesting activity will be monitored. The restoration of the wetland will be monitored using photo points, ocular and some quantitative analysis to determine changes in both vegetation and levels of Alma Taylor Lake. A UWRI completion report will be added to the UWRI database.
Partners:
Mule Deer foundation has spent many years in this area doing similar treatments to improve habitats. The Utah Division of Water Rights will determine if the wetland work follows all applicable state law. The project has undergone public scoping as part of the NEPA process and been allowed to provide input. The project occurs only of U.S. Forest Service property and does not adjoin any other jurisdictions. The Utah Watershed Initiative has funded numerous projects in this area in the past.
Future Management:
This timber stand improvement portion of the this project will be maintained by commercial timber harvest which will remove the remaining trees after they have grown to the proper size. Then young trees will be allowed to grow, be thinned, and then harvested again. This area is essential and is required by the forest plan to be managed for timber resources, so area will be used in the future for vegetation operations. The wet meadow portion of the project should not require future management actions to ensure success. The area will be monitored to determine if the this is indeed the case, if not then appropriate actions will be taken to ensure success.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The pre-commercial thinning will promote large tree development which may be utilized in the future for commercial logging. The clear-cuts will open up portions of canopy and encourage forage growth for domestic livestock decreasing pressure other areas. This area is part of the Black Canyon Allotment and actively grazed.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$250,000.00 $245,000.00 $495,000.00 $0.00 $495,000.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services 1000 acres of thinning at 250 dollars and acre $250,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) Project Oversight $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Clearcut of 70 to 150 acres $0.00 $145,000.00 $0.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) Wet Meadow Restoration Equipment and Personnel $0.00 $80,000.00 $0.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$251,557.40 $245,000.00 $496,557.40 $0.00 $496,557.40
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
UWRI-Pre-Suppression Fund U006 $59,067.86 $0.00 $0.00 2020
USFS-WRI A056 $32,475.43 $0.00 $0.00 2020
DNR Watershed U004 $44,286.04 $0.00 $0.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) Includes meadow restoration, group selection, and project oversight contributions. $0.00 $245,000.00 $0.00 2020
Habitat Council Account QHCR $12,731.67 $0.00 $0.00 2020
DNR Watershed U004 $80,471.83 $0.00 $0.00 2022
USFS-WRI A056 $22,524.57 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
OHV Motorized Recreation Medium
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Meadow
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss High
Open Water
Threat Impact
Relationship Between Groundwater and Surface Water NA
Project Comments
Comment 01/28/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
I'm curious about the meadow restoration aspect of this project. Your plan, as stated, is to obliterate the compacted soils to improve hydrologic connectivity. You also say that this portion of the project shouldn't need future management actions to ensure success, other than possibly temporary electric fencing to control grazing. The pictures you attached show the meadow overrun with tire tracks. Is vehicular traffic the cause of the soil compaction? Has off-road travel already been addressed in this area or are there other management actions you could take to help ensure the problem doesn't return?
Comment 02/04/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
I added that barrier rock will be placed at the end of the unauthorized route to prevent future damage. Does that answer the question? Thanks for the comment.
Comment 01/28/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
You have listed several wildlife species, including lynx, ruffed grouse, black bear, and wolverine, but haven't cited management plans for these species. You might consider including additional management plans for these species or explaining how these species will benefit from this project. You should also look into the State and County RMP's. Adding these additional plans could help improve your score during ranking.
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
As I talked with biologists the species list changed significantly. I have updated the list and references either the WAP or conservation plans. I have also added in reference to both the State and County Resource Management Plans. Thanks for the input.
Comment 01/28/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
Your budget shows that this project includes three aspects: thinning, clear cutting, and meadow restoration. However, your map does not show the area that will be clearcut. Also the project details don't say anything about the clear cutting. Can you add more information about this part of the project and include it on the map?
Comment 02/04/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
I am working on that and will let you know when it is uploaded. I am having an issue with overlapping polygons on the border. So if you know any tricks? Thanks
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
The map files are now uploaded showing all 3 aspects of the project. Thanks
Comment 01/28/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
I don't think this project actually has much relevance to the Aspen-Conifer habitat type. The interest in this habitat type, as described in the Utah Wildlife Action Plan, is entirely focused on aspen. My understanding is that this project is more focused on the health of the Lodgepole pine, and wouldn't do much to promote aspen. I recommend that the Aspen-Conifer habitat be removed from the project. I bring it up only in the interest of accuracy for the State's reporting of activities related to the Wildlife Action Plan. It shouldn't change the scores this project receives during the ranking process.
Comment 02/04/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
The project has been adapted since last year the group selection (clear cutting) was added. These areas contain aspen, they will be cut as part of the prescription. The cutting should encourage young saplings and lead to some regeneration. Although some aspen occurs I would say it is not a major component, but a portion of the end goal. Thanks for the comment.
Comment 01/30/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Daniel Abeyta
to help address Tori's comments about mgmt. plans for the species, take a look at the State Wildlife Action Plan for each individual species. https://wildlife.utah.gov/learn-more/wap2015.html
Comment 02/04/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
Thanks
Comment 02/04/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
I'm assuming that the meadow restoration part of this project will have some effect on water quality and/or quantity, and yet it isn't mentioned in that section of the proposal. Describing this aspect of the project in more detail could help improve your score during the ranking process.
Comment 02/04/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
I added some information. Will you please let me know if that is satisfactory or if you would like more information? Thanks
Comment 02/05/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
The additions help. Thanks. Could this wet meadow and Alma Taylor lake be considered Boreal Toad habitat? If so, you could probably list them as a benefiting species.
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
I am looking through the species list for Boreal Toad? And I can not find it. Is there another name I should look under?
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
I think it is listed as Western Toad.
Comment 02/07/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
Thanks
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Sampson
I think this a great project. Removing lodge pole pine will help create a good under story for ungulates like deer and elk. Clint Sampson Biologist UDWR
Comment 02/22/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Ryan Mower
Thanks for the support
Comment 08/24/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. Thanks.
Comment 08/30/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please give some more details in the Completion Form about this project so anyone reading the report can understand the who, what, when, why, how, etc. of the project without needing to read the entire proposal. Also please make sure that your map page shows the final actual treatments and that they match up with what is described in the completion report.
Comment 09/14/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Completion reports were due August 31st. Please correct the issue(s) listed in the comment above. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Be sure to click the Finalize button on the completion form so I know that the completion info is ready to be reviewed again. Thanks.
Comment 09/19/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Ryan - The methods need more detail. What do you mean by meadow tracks and what type of implement was used to rip the area? I would imagine timing would be important for this type of treatment? When did it occur? Who completed the work? The map feature that you have used for this treatment represents putting an aeration system in a lake so it should be changed. The closest thing I could come up with is a terrestrial treatment, bulldozing, other. For the other treatment, I have similar questions. Who did the work? The map shows both thinning and clearcutting but the report only talks about thinning. Was it completed by hand crew or mechanically? Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
08/02/2021
End Date:
11/30/2021
FY Implemented:
2022
Final Methods:
The meadow tracks were ripped to restore natural contouring using a small bulldozer and allowed to naturally revegetate. This work was completed by the USFS road crew. The area has almost fully recovered. In order to protect the meadow long term a new trail head was constructed. The thick lodgepole was thinned to a spacing between 12 and 15 feet by a contractor through WRI. All aspen was left in place. A clearcut using a contractor was completed on approximately 71 acres. This timber was sold to the public as firewood This opened up the canopy for wildlife.
Project Narrative:
The Alma Taylor Timber Stand Improvement and Meadow Restoration project improved forest ecosystems health, including vegetation and wildlife habitat improvement, and reduced the risk of catastrophic fire. The intent of the project was to improve the resilience and adaptive capacity of lodgepole pine stands, reducing high stand densities and remove dwarf mistletoe infected trees where possible. The thinning of thick lodgepole pine will provide additional passage and forage for wildlife, as well as reduce the risk of potentially destructive wildfire by breaking up fuel continuity. The clearcuts create a mosaic to reduce fire potential and create a create a more diverse system. The wet meadow damaged by traffic around Alma Taylor Lake has been significantly damaged due to unauthorized motorized access. The meadow was restored and ongoing access will be prevented after the construction of a new trailhead.
Future Management:
The meadow will continue to be monitored to see if any future work is necessary. Right now it appears as though no work will be needed. The timber stands will continue to be managed for Forest Health and Multiple Use.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8018 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
8019 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Clearcutting
11901 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bulldozing Other
Project Map
Project Map