Parowan Front Braffits Creek
Project ID: 4990
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 953
Project Manager: Jeremy Cox
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Treat 1,689 acres (BLM 690, WMA 847, SITLA 117, private 35) mechanically (mastication) to enhance winter range habitat primarily for mule deer and reduce hazardous fuels near Cedar City and Summit Utah. The area contains all phases of pinyon-juniper encroachment the majority being phase 3. The proposed project would also be seeded.
Location:
The area is located between Cedar City and Summit, Utah in iron county east of I-15.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Parowan Front project area is dominated by stands of pinyon and juniper trees with a high percentage of young trees encroaching areas of remaining sagebrush, bitterbrush, cliffrose, and other deciduous shrubs causing a downward trend in herbaceous cover. The project area serves as an important winter and transition range for mule deer. The I-15 corridor severly diminishes the amount of winter range accessible to the Panguitch Lake deer herd (unit 28). This project will help address these limiting factors by improving and adding critical high quality transitional and winter range for mule deer and other sage brush steppe species. The Panguitch Lake (unit 28) deer herd is currently above objective. The main limiting factor being winter range (doe tags and expensive re-location projects are being used to address this problem). This treatment will help to expand critical high quality habitat, and in return will help bring mule deer populations within healthy carrying capacities for long term improvements in rangeland health. Accordingly, the Parowan Front Wildlife Management Plan states" due to the extent of the encroachment an aggressive thinning policy is to be carried out on the Parowan Front WMA's to improve habitat for wintering deer." Habitat improvement is important to minimize wildlife depredation on surrounding agricultural lands and to counteract the loss of habitat in surrounding areas due to development. Impacts to the plant communities caused by high concentration of wintering mule deer can be observed, sagebrush shows extremely high use and in turn is leading to a decrease in frequency due to mortality of the plants. Also of note is the prevalent hedging of the juniper trees. In December 2018, 50 radio collars were deployed on mule deer wintering along the Parowan Front to provide insight on mule deer movement on this limited winter range. This project will assist in the evaluation of the immediate impacts to wintering mule deer in relation to habitat restoration efforts. The implementation of this project will provide a unique opportunity to acquire movement data associated with treatments prior to, during, and after implementation.
Objectives:
The overall goals for the project are: restore the sage steppe ecosystem; restore and enhance riparian systems and water quality, and improve big game habitat on public lands. Specifically, the goals are to remove 90% or more of pinyon and juniper trees in the project area while leaving islands of trees in a mosaic pattern for use by mule deer as thermal cover; re-establish perennial grass, forbs and shrubs to as close to ESD percentages as possible by re-seeding the treatment area with a seed mix that resembles the ESD plant community. In projects similar to this we have seen an increase in the forage of up to 500-800% and we would expect similar increases in this project; decrease hazardous fuels and the threat of catastrophic fire, by masticating the fuels within the treatment area; and reduce erosion potential and sediment in to the Cedar Valley and Little Salt Lake Valley, by removing invasive pinyon an juniper trees from the riparian corridor, as well as the uplands and drainage basins allowing the riparian habitat to re-establish and function to reduce erosion and sedimentation events and keep the water temperatures down.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The invasion of pinyon and juniper trees into areas once dominated by grasses, forbs, and shrubs has lowered the carrying capacity for wintering mule deer. Not completing this project we risk mule deer herds being forced to compete for browse and forage on an already crowded winter range, thus decreasing the carrying capacity of the winter and transition range even further. The increase of pinyon and juniper also increases the risk for catastrophic wildfires in these habitats, resulting in the complete or partial loss of current winter range and likely conversion to non -native (ie cheatgrass) systems detrimental to other wildlife species (eg. threat to FEHA from non-native plant establishment). Pinyon and Juniper expansion has also resulted in loss of foraging areas for raptors such as Ferruginous hawk due to the continuous canopy. Opening up foraging spaces in this canopy while retaining clumps of trees with large flat-topped juniper for raptor perches and nesting is synchronous with the design feature of retaining patches of thermal and hiding cover for wintering big game. A past project identical to (Private land mastication adjacent) the proposed project has proven successful in meeting these objectives. As with any surface disturbing activity in a sagebrush steppe ecosystem there is a low potential for weed invasion. BLM/DWR will aggressively treat any noxious weeds within the treatment area if found.
Relation To Management Plan:
Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management plan (2014) Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. Panguitch lake Deer Herd Unit Mangement Plan (#28) 2015 The mid elevation upland site supports a pinyon-Utah juniper community and is generally considered to be in very poor condition for deer winter range. This community is prone to infilling from pinyon-juniper trees which can reduce understory shrub and herbaceous cover if not addressed. It is recommended that work to reduce the pinyon-juniper cover (e.g. bullhog, chaining, lop and scatter, etc.) should continue in this plant community. Parowon Front Wildlifre management plan All of the units on the Parowan Front WMA have pinyon-juniper forests that are encroaching on the sagebrush flats and choking out many of the browse species important to wintering deer. Several thinning (lop and scatter) and chaining projects have been done in the past to remedy this problem. However, due to the extent of the encroachment an aggressive thinning policy needs to be carried out on the Parowan Front WMA to improve habitat for wintering deer. Southern Utah Support Area Fire Mangement Plan 2004 which states: Mechanicallly treat to convert pinyon and juniper invasion (condition class 3) into sagebrush/perennial grass (condition class 1 or 2) vegetation types. . Utah's Standards and Guidelines for Rangeland Health which address watersheds, ecological condition, water quality and habitat for special status species National Fire Plan (2000) Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 which state protecting forests, woodlands, shrub lands, and grasslands from unnaturally intensive and destructives fires Utah Wildlife conservation Strategy (2005) Iron County Deer Winter Range Resource Plan (2011) Protect and expand deer winter range and associated wildlife habitats. State of Utah Resource Management Plan (2018) The state supports the efforts of the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative and other rehabilitative efforts throughout the state The state supports the Watershed Restoration Initiative to encourage reduced wildfire acreage, reduced soil loss from erosion, reduced sedimentation and storage loss in reservoirs, and improved water quality. The state plan supports active management to improve and enhance riparian resources to provide for appropriate physical, biological and chemical function. engage with federal land management agencies to support active management of healthy riparian areas on federal land. Seeding an optimal mix of native and desirable non-native species to support desired ecologic conditions and create a properly functioning ecosystem. Actively remove pinyon-juniper encroachment in other ecological sites due to its substantial consumption of water and its detrimental effect on sagebrush, other vegetation and wildlife. Use of the good neighbor program to partner with Federal Agencies to better manage forage. Iron County Resource Management Plan (2017) This plan supports our project in the following ways; Encouraging the BLM in managing rangelands "in a manner that will protect the quality of scientific, scenic, historical, ecological, environmental, air and atmospheric, water resource, and archeological values, while providing for outdoor recreation, food and habitat for fish, wildlife, and domestic animals. By stating that it supports management of rangelands and forestlands to enhance desired plant communities that benefit watersheds, wildlife, water quality, recreation, and sustainable livestock grazing. By encouraging multiple-use as custom and culture on current and future federal land projects. By encouraging protection of watershed from the threats of catastrophic wildfire through proper management of forests, and the reduction of fuel loads to prevent and minimize wildfires and their effects and whenever re-seeding needs to occure re-seeding with certified weed-free seed. By stating that riparian areas should be managed to protect vegetation characteristics. Conservation efforts include preserving existing riparian areas as well as restoring damaged ones. Preservation should also include the dedication of sufficient water and groundwater to support vegetation. By supporting range improvement projects in crucial deer winter ranges to sustain viable huntable populations, limiting off-road travel of vehicles in crucial deer winter ranges, and efforts to expand deer wintering ranges in the county.
Fire / Fuels:
The majority of the area is at moderate to extreme on the fire risk index. There is a large fuel load build up along the Parowan Front and an alteration in fuel types. Pinyon and juniper trees have expanded and moved into areas once dominated by shrubs, forbs, and grasses. Without this project, fuel conditions are such that a wildfire may be difficult to contain, leading to an increased risk to firefighter and public safety, suppression effectiveness and natural resource degradation. Fire Regime Condition Class within the project areas is predominately FRCC 3 which is where fire regimes have been extensiviely altered and risk of losing key ecosystem components from fire is high. Treatments identified within this proposal, including seeding with more fire resistant vegetation, would help reduce hazardous fuel loads, create fuel breaks, and reduce the overall threat of a catastrophic wildfire which could impact the communities of Cedar City, Summit and outlying residential properties and infrastructure. Treatments in and around the sagebrush areas would break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of wildfire entering these sensitive areas. Removing pinyon and juniper in a mosaic pattern would also break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of a high intensity wildfire. Because there is a geater risk of conversion of shrublands to annual grasslands under a high intensity fire, managed, pro-active treatments proposed would reduce the likelihood of cheatgrass invasion and help perennial grasses and forbs persist long-term.
Water Quality/Quantity:
In the mastication process much of the bare soil will be covered by small pieces of woody debris which will aid in the establishment of vegetative cover, which will reduce water runoff and decrease soil erosion into Cedar Valley and Little Salt Lake Valley. Implementation of this project will also greatly increase water infiltration into the soil, recharging groundwater systems in the area. Recent research Roundy, et. al.(2014) has shown that mechanical treatments to remove pinyon and juniper increase time that soil water is available. Even four years after treatment, treated areas showed from 8.6 days to 18 days additional water availability at high elevation sites. Additional research by Young, et. al. (2013) also showed a relationship between tree removal and soil climates and wet days on these sites, which while providing more available moisture for desired vegetation could also provide moisture for weeds. Numerous studies have shown that increased infiltration rates and less overland flow improve both water quality and quantity. We believe that by implementing this project in the drainage basin that feeds Braffits Creek that we will increase the amount of water that makes it to the stream bed. We anticipate that this will result in an increase in the amount of flow in the stream as well as how far the stream flows. We also expect that this will result in stream flow durations that will take sections of the stream from current conditions of intermittent flow and change them over to perennial flow. By changing the flow regimes in these areas we also feel like this will allow for the riparian vegetation along the channel to expand and infill and create a healthy functioning stream. If this infilling in the riparian areas does not happen on its own and there is water and hydric soils suitable to sustain the plant communities then we will come back and manually add the plants that we would like to see along the stream, with a future project proposal.
Compliance:
NEPA was completed June 2018. Archeological clearances were completed in 2018, project is ready for on the ground implementation. Sites will be avoided where required and incorporated into the mosaic design of the project where possible. The treatment would be rested from livestock grazing for a minimum of two growing seasons following project implementation to ensure adequate rest and seedling establishment. Wildlife clearances will be completed prior to implementation and any concerns will be mitigated prior to treatment.
Methods:
Pinyon and Juniper, which currently occupy and are encroaching upon the site will be removed through mechanically chipping/shredding/mulching(1689 acres) pinyon and juniper trees. Islands and corridors of pinyon and juniper would remain untreated throughout the unit, creating a mosaic pattern of treated and untreated vegetation with special attention given to retaining a few large flat-topped juniper for raptor perching and nesting in the patches retained for thermal and hiding cover for big game. Before mechanical implementation, treated areas would be broadcast seeded with a mix of native and non-native shrubs, grasses and forbs important for improving wintering mule deer habitat, and stabilizing the soil.
Monitoring:
There are two long term range trend study sites adjacent to the proposed project boundaries. These plots will continue to be read in the future and used to monitor treatment response. Photopoints will be established throughout the project, before and after pictures. UDWR Habitat and Wildlife biologists will establish a monitoring site within the treatment area that will monitor pellet counts for utilization as well as point intercept plots that will monitor establishment and overall health of the plant community. This will not be an established plot that is read by the DWR Range Trend Crew. This plot will be read annually in the spring by DWR habitat and wildlife biologists after winter utilization has taken place to determine rangeland health and carrying capacity on WMA properties, and should correlate closely to surrounding treatment areas on BLM, and Private Land. Radio telemetry data from wintering mule deer will be used in the evaluation of this project. The data will also be used to identify future treatments that may provide valuable stopover habitat during migratory movements. Pre and post monitoring of flows, on Braffits Creek and potentially other perennial streams within and adjacent to the project area will take place to ascertain the benefits of the project. PFC will also continue to be conducted on the perennial streams within and adjacent to the project area.
Partners:
Spring 2017 BLM was approached by the Division of Wildlife Resources and the NRCS with the idea of doing some land restoration treatments along the Parowan Front to restore and enhance winter mule deer range. This project entails 690 acres of BLM, 117 acres of SITLA, 847 acres of WMA, and 35 acres of Private. The Division of Wildlife has been heavily involved in the layout and planning process of this project, because much of it involves land they manage directly. During the planning stages we also consulted with Great Basin Research Center on appropriate plant species to use in the seed mix. Private landowners were contacted and are excited and involved in creating and implementing this project as well. The Private land that is being treated is land that will connect some previously treated areas to the areas that this project will be treating and make them one contiguous treatment area. This private landowner is also contributing to the project by allowing us to access the upper elevation treatment areas through his private property and road systems.
Future Management:
The BLM portion of this project falls within two authorized livestock (cattle) grazing allotments within the treatment area; Fiddlers Canyon and Webster Hill. Fiddlers Canyon is divided into 6 pastures that are grazed from 10/01-6/30 on a deferred rest rotation. A portion of this project will be in Pasture 3&4 where grazing occurs in the spring (either 4/15-5/31, 05/15-6/30 or rest.) Webster Hill is divided into two pastures that are grazed from 05/01-06/15. All areas seeded will be rested for a minimum of two growing seasons to ensure adequate rest and seedling establishment. This rest will be assured through a signed document (Grazing AOI) from the grazing permittee and the BLM. Vegetation will continue to be monitored for utilization, cover and trend. Future maintenance projects to protect investments made by UWRI/BLM have been addressed and allowed through the project planning document (NEPA) planning process to allow other methods in the future. Parowan Front WMA's will be managed primarily for the benefit of wildlife. Grazing of cattle will be used on the WMA properties to reduce grasses and promote the growth of browse if deemed necessary by habitat management staff. Grazing will only be administered through a high intensity short-term period strategy, from early may to early June. Regional UDWR personnel will evaluate each unit for habitat quality on a yearly basis. At that time it will be decided what units, if any will be grazed by livestock (primarily cattle) the following year.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Rangeland conditions are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The health, vigor, recruitment and production of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs would improve which would provide a more palatable and nutritional source of forage for both livestock and wildlife. Implementation of this project would eventually improve overall livestock performance (e.g. increased cow weights, increased calf crops, increased weaning weights, etc) and improve the economic stability of the permittees due to an increase in the quantity and quality of grasses and other herbaceous forage which are important to livestock grazing. The private landowners should see increases in available forage, in areas that will be used by livestock. Thick woodlands typically deter use by livestock, simply because there is easier and more desired areas to feed. Opening these areas and increasing the amount of forage through planting will allow for livestock to disperse, likely providing relief to other areas that have been utilized historically. These areas are used extensively for recreation by hunters and wildlife viewers. They are also popular areas for shed antler gathering. UDWR issues several firewood permits every year allowing the public to remove firewood from previously treated areas. On BLM administered lands firewood gathering, and cedar post cutting is also permissible and is governed through a permit that can be purchased at the local BLM office.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$810,511.96 $5,000.00 $815,511.96 $20,000.00 $835,511.96
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Seed (GBRC) Seed mix #1 grass and forbs 690 acres @ $42.80 Seed Mix #2 Kochia and Sage Brush 690 @ $6.84 for BLM administered lands $34,251.60 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Aerial seeding flight #1 grass forbs 690 acres @$15 Aerial seeding flight #2 Kochia and Sage 690 acres @ $15 for BLM administered lands $20,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Other Cadastral survey $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) Project layout, contract preparation, and administration for 1,689 acres of bullhog and seeding. $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2020
Contractual Services Mechanical mulching contract 690acres @ $400/ac BLM administered lands $276,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Seed (GBRC) Seed mix #1 grass and forbs 964 acres @ $42.80/ac Seed mix #2 Kochia and Sage 964 acres @ $6.84/ac for State administered lands $47,852.96 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Seed (GBRC) Seed mix #1 grass & forbs 35 acres @ $42.80/ac Seed mix #2 Kochia & Sage 35 acres @ $46.84/ac Private lands $1,737.40 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Aerial seeding flight #1 grass &forbs 964 acres @ $15/ac Aerial seeding flight #2 Kochia & Sage 964 acres @ $15/ac State administered lands $28,920.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Aerial seeding flight #1 grass & forbs 35acres @ $15/ac Aerial seeding flight #2 Kochia & Sage 35acres @ $15/ac Private lands $1,050.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Mechanical mulching contract 964acres @ $400/ac State administered lands $385,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Contractual Services Mechanical mulching contract 35acres @ $400/ac Private lands $14,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$848,057.00 $5,000.00 $853,057.00 $20,000.00 $873,057.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
MDF Expo Permit ($1.50) S053 $21,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
BLM Fuels (Color Country) $0.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 2020
Habitat Council Account QHCR $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
UWRI-Pre-Suppression Fund U006 $442,595.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
BLM Fuels (Color Country) A088 New GNA $212,462.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
BLM (Forestry) A095 $80,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation S022 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Ferruginous Hawk N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Ferruginous Hawk N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Ferruginous Hawk N4
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Habitats
Habitat
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Cabin Communities / Development Medium
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Project Comments
Comment 02/08/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Gary, You mention that winter range is a limiting factor for this unit while at the same time the unit is over objective. Isn't improving winter range going to exacerbate that situation? You further state that doe tags and "expensive translocations" are being used to deal with the situation. If you improve winter range condition, which should increase over-winter survival, won't that require additional doe tags and even more "expensive translocation"? What is the balance here? Keith
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Keith, those are valid notes on the justification where consideration for this project should not simply be placed on the potential for antlerless permits and/or translocations. The benefits of improving/expanding winter range on a unit currently exceeding population objective outweigh the potential long-term negative impacts of continued over-utilization to both the range and the deer herd. Extensive efforts have been made to improve winter range on the east side of the unit (South Canyon), where this project aims to continue these efforts on the west side to promote healthier mule deer independent of the population estimate in relation to objective. In my opinion, this project is over-due on a crucial winter range that epitomizes several of the threats to mule deer across their range. Hope that helps the discussion for this project.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Dustin, I did not mean to imply that improving winter range is a bad thing. I don't think anyone would. My point was more along the lines of noting that doing so is not going to correct the fact that the unit is over objective. Direct management of the herd will still be necessary. Keith
Comment 02/13/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
It look like the SITLA management has plans for the trust lands in section 25 that would not be compatible with the proposed project. Please delete that portion from the plan. Sorry about that.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Scott I talked with Curtis Roundy he updated me on the situation, I will pull that polygon from the project. Thanks for the heads up.
Comment 02/13/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Jeremy, Looks like a great project for mule deer and across multiple ownership boundaries no less. Nice to not think about sage grouse for a project;-). Thanks for outlining the importance of this project to the mule deer herd. I see there is a big game range trend site in your project area (28R - 22 - Above Elliker Basin). Does data from this site support your project need? Will you be monitoring the supposed flow increases in Braffits Creek or is there literature that supports your assertion of increased flows? Any Specific water quality issues that will be addressed in Braffits Creek or other perennial water bodies? The flooding in Parowan Creek the past couple years shows the potential of runoff from these soil type to damage infrastructure, which would be greatly exacerbated in a post-fire scenario here, which would be another fire risk. Any other wildlife monitoring besides big game? Are there currently issues with utilization or distribution on the allotments in question?
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jeremy Cox
Thanks Mike, I'll answer your first question. Their are several range trends sights along the Parowan front Elliker basin being one of them. They all show a downward trend in sagebrush occurance and production. This is generally agreed upon that their are just to many mounths (deer) using these plants. So yes in short by creating new areas of forage it will take some pressure of the sagebrush and allow it to recover.
Comment 02/15/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Mike, Flow measures in Braffits Creek would be a great addition to the pre and post monitoring of this treatment, thank you for your suggestion. I have added that to the monitoring section. At this time I do not know of any specific water quality issues with Braffits Creek. As for distribution livestock stay mostly on the private portion of the Webster Hill allotment due to the P/J encroachment on BLM and utilization is within compliance. A portion of the treatment falls within the Fiddlers Canyon allotment where livestock do not venture due to the topography. A non-use agreement for the rest period will be signed prior to implementation and conversations with permittee's have already taken place. Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
Comment 02/21/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
The range trend sites in this area show this as being mountain big sagebrush, but Wyoming big sagebrush is requested in the seed mix. It also seems the seed rate of sagebrush is quite low (.04 pls/acre). Is there good residual understory of sagebrush or should that rate be increased some? Have you considered more targeted seeding of some of the shrubs like cliffrose, bitterbrush, and fourwing (and maybe Indian ricegrass) using an atv drill? Looks like a great project.
Comment 02/22/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Hey Kevin - thanks for the great comments. We are definitely open to using Mtn. Sage in place of or in addition to Wyo. and possibly adjusting rates. We would also love to do some additional browse seeding via other methods including the ATV drill and dedicated hunters with the bitterbrush seed planters (see proposal 4961).
Comment 08/26/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please give some more details in the Completion Form about this project so anyone reading the report can understand the who, what, when, why, how, etc. of the project without needing to read the entire proposal. You are mainly missing the why. This should be a stand alone doc for this project. Thanks.
Comment 09/03/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thanks for making those corrections. I have moved this project to completed.
Completion
Start Date:
11/21/2019
End Date:
06/09/2020
FY Implemented:
2020
Final Methods:
November 9, 2019: Aerially seeded 1,507 acres of grass, forbs, and shrubs by Eagle Aviation. November 21, 2019: Mulching began on contract. Contractor was Giles Construction. Mulching was shut down temporarily January 16, 2020 due to snow depths being inhibiting to further operations at that time. Work resumed March 28, 2020. A total of 4-8 machines were used throughout the contract. Contract was completed on June 9, 2020
Project Narrative:
The Parowan Front project area is dominated by stands of pinyon and juniper trees with a high percentage of young trees encroaching areas of remaining sagebrush, bitterbrush, cliffrose, and other deciduous shrubs causing a downward trend in herbaceous cover. The project area serves as an important winter and transition range for mule deer. The I-15 corridor severly diminishes the amount of winter range accessible to the Panguitch Lake deer herd (unit 28). This project will help address these limiting factors by improving and adding critical high quality transitional and winter range for mule deer and other sage brush steppe species. The Panguitch Lake (unit 28) deer herd is currently above objective. The main limiting factor being winter range (doe tags and expensive re-location projects are being used to address this problem). This treatment will help to expand critical high quality habitat, and in return will help bring mule deer populations within healthy carrying capacities for long term improvements in rangeland health. Project started on January 9, 2020 by aerially seeding grass, forbs, and shrubs with a fixed winged aircraft. Contractor took 1 day to complete the project and did a good job. Mulching contract started on November 21, 2019. Giles Construction was awarded the contract. Contractor began work running a total of 4-8 machines (excavators with fecon head). Multiple problems were encontered on getting work done on time Work was finally completed on June 9, 2020, two month late. We had problems with the archeological survey not being completed on time which delayed the start time of the contractor by no fault of theirs. Midway through the project snow levels become to deep to further work. Work resumed March 28,2020. Projected was completed June 9, 2020, the project looked great and all stips were met. Aerial and mulching contract was let through WRI contracting process.
Future Management:
Project area will be monitored for veg trend, cover and wildlife use for the next 3 years. The project area will be rested from livestock for a minimum of 2 complete growing seasons in order to allow the seedlings to become established and set seed. This rest period may be extended if monitoring shows the seeding has not sufficiently established
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
7939 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
7939 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
Project Map
Project Map