Bitter Creek - Cutthroat Trout and Riparian Habitat improvement
Project ID: 5008
Status: Pending Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 2681
Project Manager: Jordan McMahon
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office:
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
This pilot project will build woody in-stream structures on tributaries of Bitter creek. This will enhance in-stream complexity (pools, riffles, cover, meanders), improve habitat for fish, and raise the water table helping riparian plants establish.
Location:
Bitter Creek is a tributary of the White River, whose headwaters are in Colorado. The stream enters Utah near the southern border of Uintah County. The lower section is often dry, but the upper portion and tributaries consist of 30 plus kilometers of perennial water in Utah.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Currently many of the stream miles in the system consist of a narrow fairly straight channel with little complexity. Very little water is being exchanged with the riparian zone. The riparian grasses along the stream are in good shape, and some locations have healthy stands of willow. Most of those willows are in Rat Hole Canyon in an area with lots floodplain, connectivity, and higher water tables, providing water to a wider riparian zone. Areas without willow in the system are lacking this hydrologic complexity. The lack of sufficient fish habitat and riparian habitat in the system threatens the persistence of Colorado River Cutthroat Trout.
Objectives:
1) Improve fish habitat 2) Increase riparian woody species 3) Improve measurements of BLM land health standards 4) Increase the streams resiliency to fire events 5) Improve water quality 6) Increase baseflow discharge
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The project is focused on improving the condition of both instream fish habitat and the riparian zone by concentrating on instream woody instream structures to improve composition and vigor of woody riparian species. Without restoration intervention it is unlikely that degradation to Bitter Creek will be reversed, and may worsen, resulting in greater cost if restoration is delayed. Actions aimed to improve habitat conditions are needed to ensure the persistence of cutthroat trout and native riparian vegetation. For example, natural recovery from incision can take centuries to millennia without restoration actions.
Relation To Management Plan:
CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR COLORADO RIVER CUTTHROAT TROUT. Objective 4 -- Secure and enhance watershed conditions. Strategy 7 -- Improve habitat conditions for CRCT (utilizing habitat improvement techniques including stream bank stabilization, increased water temperature refugia, and riparian management) UINTAH COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN. 8.4.8 -- Support efforts to protect water quality and the quality of the associated fisheries. 8.4.9 -- Support efforts to improve fish habitats while balancing the rights of adjacent landowners and holders of water rights. 9.4.2 -- Encourage the restoration of floodplain connectivity for improved flood control in suitable areas. 20.4.2 -- Conserve and protect riparian areas through application of best management practices. 20.4.12 -- Encourage efforts to enhance streambeds and control erosion. Increase coverage and composition of vegetation. VERNAL BLM RMP: Riparian resources: Maintain, restore, improve, protect, and expand riparian-wetland areas so they are in Proper Functioning Condition (PFC) and meet BLM Utah Standards for Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Grazing Management for their productivity, biological diversity, and sustainability, and achieve an advanced (late-climax seral stage) ecological status, except where resource management will require an earlier ecological status for such purposes as vegetation diversity. Special status species: Conserve and protect special status species and enhance their habitats, Implement the management recovery measures necessary to increase populations of special status species, including federally listed animal species, and restore them to their historic ranges by enhancing, protecting, and restoring known and potential habitat and the ecosystems on which they depend, Manage non-listed sensitive species and the habitats upon which they depend in such a manner as to preclude the need to list them as either threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The guidance for this management is put forth in the BLM 6840 Manual. BLM Grazing Management Regulations, 43 CFR Subpart 4120.2 * Objectives are to promote healthy sustainable rangeland ecosystems; to accelerate restoration and improvement of public lands to properly functioning condition...requires development of guidelines to address the restoration, maintenance and enhancement of habitats to promote the conservation of Federal proposed, Federal candidate, and other special status species. Deer Statewide Management Plan: Habitat objective 2 line e: states use WRI to improve riparian habitats throughout Utah.
Fire / Fuels:
The proposed project will mitigate fire risk by creating areas unlikely to burn due to high water tables, and in some areas standing water. Maintaining high water tables and increased surface water due to beaver dams and woody debris reduces the probability that such areas will burn. Furthermore, maintaining physically complex and healthy streams and riparian areas acts to buffer post-fire sediment and runoff, limiting post-fire erosion. The proposed project will help create a landscape more resilient to fire. Given the cost of post-fire rehabilitation and the risks associated with stream erosion post-fire maintaining healthy streams and riparian areas is of special importance. An example of fire resilience is shown in the images/documents section of this proposal. The picture was taken immediately post fire showing a section of healthy riparian stream surrounded by burned hillsides.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The proposed project will use woody structures to essentially provide the same function as beaver dams; in that the structures will impound water, capture/settle/stabilize stream supplied sediment, increase water levels and corresponding water table, and aid in establishment of riparian vegetation on banks and adjacent floodplain. Water quality benefits of the proposed project would include reduction of suspended sediment, capture of sediment loads, increase DO, decrease overall water temperatures and increase base flows.
Compliance:
NEPA will be completed by the Vernal BLM, included in the NEPA will be archeology and cultural resource clearance. A stream alteration permit, and temporary water right for BDA structures will also be acquired if deemed necessary be the permitting entities.
Methods:
For this pilot phase 60-80 woody instream structures will be constructed over an 8-day period. This phase is separated into two different complexes located on Chapita Creek, and in Rat Hole Canyon. Many of the woody instream structures will act as BDAs and mimic the structure and function of beaver dams, while other structures will mimic natural accumulations of large woody debris (LWD). Ponding and increased floodplain connectivity due to dams and other structure types will cause an elevation increase in the water table and groundwater levels (Woo and Waddington, 1990) which will also aid in riparian recovery and expansion. Ultimately, with a high enough density of structures they can attenuate water table decline during the dry season elevating base flow (Westbrook et al., 2006; Burchsted et al., 2010) and improving water quality. A healthy riparian corridor will increase the surface roughness of the floodplain which will increase the magnitude of overbank deposition during high flows providing an increase in sediment storage on the floodplain and benefits to downstream water quality. Water quality benefits of the proposed project would include reduction of suspended sediment, capture of sediment loads, increase dissolved oxygen, decrease overall water temperatures, and increase base flows. The initial structures will serve as a pilot project to test the site-specific geomorphic and hydrologic responses, which will inform the larger-scale restoration. Based on the lessons learned from the pilot project we will ultimately expand the scale of the structure treatment as needed to achieve restoration objectives. The installation of structures will be completed by youth crews trained and overseen by BLM. The area has an abundance of large sagebrush (many over 6ft tall). Sagebrush will be cut using chainsaws and used to build the instream structures; dependent on-site specific logistics pinyon pine or other conifers will be harvested if it is closer to the restoration area, with preferential removal of these species from aspen stands, aiding in aspen regeneration. Harvested wood will be moved to the stream using a UTV and small trailer. All digging in the stream bank will be done with hand tools.
Monitoring:
To determine effectiveness of the structures pre- and post-treatment fish sampling by UDWR will occur to measure fish abundance and health in the restoration reaches. Site specific monitoring will include a mixture of instream pebble counts, installation of water temperature loggers, vegetation, and water measurements. Pre and post proper functioning condition assessments will be completed to measure land health standards (dependent on staff availability).
Partners:
Partners in the project include UDWR, who has attended pre-proposal site visits, conducted prior fish sampling, and fish stocking. Utah State University researches have also made pre proposal site visits and advised on restoration techniques.
Future Management:
The project is part of a multi-year effort that will involve follow-up monitoring, and treatments to achieve project objectives. The long-terms goals are to restore riparian and floodplain habitats along Bitter creek and its tributaries in a manner that creates diverse riparian communities comprised primarily of native plant species as a means of improving the condition and resiliency of riparian and aquatic habitats, and as a result improve conditions for trout. If riparian woody vegetation becomes established in enough of this system it may be suitable for beaver re-introduction in the future.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
In 1994 the Nature Conservancy and Rocky Mountain Elk purchased AUM's in this allotment. The number of cattle has been reduced, therefore overutilization is usually not an issue in the riparian areas as extra forage is available. This allotment is monitored by BLM range staff and if any one area is receiving too much grazing pressure cattle can be moved to other pastures within the allotment. As a result any extra riparian forage created by this project will be available to wildlife like Elk and Mule deer. These type of structures have been shown to store spring runoff in ponds and alluvial water tables, this water is then released later in the summer increasing base flows, and this will improve summer water availability to downstream users, and make the stream more drought resistant. Currently much of the stream system is extremely narrow and difficult to fish, these structures will create more fishable pools, and grow larger trout.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $9,000.00 $19,000.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Youth installation crew: 5 person crew with 1 chainsaw for 2 work weeks $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Salary for BLM staff to aid in project planning, implementation, and assessment of project goals. $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Salary for UDWR staff to conduct fish monitoring. $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2023
NEPA To be completed by BLM $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $9,000.00 $19,000.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) $0.00 $0.00 $7,000.00 2023
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2023
BLM HLI (Riparian 1040) A093 Extension ASAP 1650 $3,313.30 $0.00 $0.00 2025
BLM (Range) A097 Extension ASAP 1666 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
BLM (Aquatics) A100 Extension ASAP 1664, 1691 $5,686.70 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American Bison N4 R2
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Big Free-tailed Bat N3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Big Free-tailed Bat N3
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Big Free-tailed Bat N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout N2 R1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Spotted Bat N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Spotted Bat N3
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Project Comments
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
Does this project area receive much livestock use? If so, how will livestock impact the stream restoration efforts? What steps will you be taking to protect the structures and recovering riparian area from over-grazing?
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
In 1994 the Nature Conservancy and Rocky Mountain Elk purchased AUM's in this allotment. The number of cattle has been reduced, therefore overutilization is usually not an issue in the riparian areas as extra forage is available. This allotment is monitored by BLM range staff and if any one area is receiving too much grazing pressure cattle can be moved to other pastures within the allotment. I will update the proposal to show this.
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryan Engelbert
1. I think you can claim increased baseflow discharge within the objectives section 2. You could place a statement in the threats and risks section about the increased expense of doing this activity, or the detriment by us not approaching this restoration activity soon. 3. I think you can add beaver re-introduction under future management, with the caveat that such action will not be implemented until we deem that the riparian vegetation can handle beavers chewing up our base. This may be worth nothing as an objective or goal of the project, since there is not currently enough forage on the landscape to place beaver in the system to do their job, other than at the top of Rat Hole Canyon, where enough aspen exist. 4. There's significant tribal lands along adjacent reaches of Bitter Creek. Successful implementation of the full project/all phases would benefit their reaches of stream as well. With that said, it may be worth discussing this proposal with the new tribal biologist to see what they have to say. 5. I feel like we're leaving a few points on the table with the sustainable uses entry. I know there's grazing around here, so livestock would benefit from increased forage growth as the water table rises. Larger/longer perennial stream reaches for livestock and wildlife to water hole are very beneficial for all parties. If we are able to be successful in holding a perennial water pattern, I assume downstream water users could be benefitted, as well as any grazing allotments downstream of the DWR owned section that experience more water for forage. Last, fishing and camping is a sustainable use. Right now I'd ask who would want to fish this trickle. But by ponding up reaches of the stream, this makes the stream much more desirable to fish, as well as grow much bigger fish than the current condition. I assume anyone in this area in the summer would be camping if they were fishing since it is so remote. I recall over 30 contacts from anglers interested in fishing the bookcliffs (in reference to Meadow Creek and Willow Creek roadless) - the same would happen upon successful completion of the project in favor of fishing and appropriate outreach efforts to get the word out about the resource. 6. I'd be in favor of adding leopard frogs (and others below) as a benefited species. Leopard frogs may be extirpated from these reaches - I have not seen one right in this vicinity - but we are close enough to source populations to get colonized if we're building instream ponds that would be more favorable frog habitat than the straight and narrow channel that currently exists. Plus leopard frogs are a WAP species. You should also be able to add a few bat species (see the Willow Creek WMA improvement proposal for species - this proposal is relatively close proximity to where all species would be the same), turkey, and bison all exist in this area and would benefit.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
Thanks for your comments, it has helped improve the project proposal. I have added proposal wording to address statements 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 of your comment. Regarding working on tribal lands I am still working with our realty staff to determine if those areas are allotment tribal, reserved tribal, or Indian trust lands, each type has its own set of rules. Once I figure that out I can move forward with trying to partner for work in those sections of stream.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryan Engelbert
No problem. I did not realize that the Tribal lands facet could be that complicated!!
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Janice Gardner
The Rapid Stream-Riparian Assessment may be an appropriate method for your monitoring needs.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
Proper monitoring is always important for measuring project success, during this pilot phase I will rely on USU, and or Anabranch solutions expertise and experience for implementing and monitoring this type of project. If this pilot phase is successful and we are able to expand the project, I plan to do restoration at sites where there is already data gathered using the BLM's aquatic Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) protocol, and or collect data using this method prior to implementation.
Comment 02/13/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Brian Maxfield
It would be appropriate to include bat species as benefiting from the project. Improvement of the riparian bottom with the addition of more vegetative components will enhance foraging habitat for bats.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
Thanks for the comment. I'm not familiar with bats. I added big free-tailed, and spotted bats to the species list based on other projects in the area.
Comment 02/13/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Miles Hanberg
I concur with the suggestion to include turkeys, bison, and bats as benefiting species. In the late 1990's. I performed a number of bird point count surveys in the Bitter Creek area. A few years post project implementation, it may be good to find a way to do follow up surveys and compare changes. Riparian birds will benefit from this project.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
Thanks for the comment and background information I have added Bats, Bison and Turkey to the species list. The new wildlife biologist at the BLM have interest in this project, if we are able to implement this pilot phase and do more work in the system I will work with them on post monitoring to compare to your data.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
What is the timeline on getting the NEPA and Archaeology completed? In the last couple years we've had some BLM projects that had delays in getting NEPA finished, so funds had to be carried over, which also negatively affected the contracting process.
Comment 02/14/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
If the project is funded I will begin the NEPA process. There are new guidelines and policy at the BLM holding us to 6 months from initiation to completion. I don't want to face the consequences of failing to meet this timeline, so NEPA will be done in time for May/June project implementation.
Comment 02/16/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryan Engelbert
One more species comment: If this project is eventually able to retain sufficient perennial baseflow discharge, I could easily see bluehead sucker, flannelmouth sucker, and roundtail chub being benefitted species in the long-term. This would become a candidate location to stock roundtail chub once we have a brood population established. Also - bluehead suckers were captured in Bitter Creek between the 1970's to as recently as the early 1990's in Bitter Creek between the Brewer Canyon and Indian Spring Canyon. This section is currently dry. It is plausible to say if we could regain water in this section that it would be bluehead sucker habitat once again.
Comment 02/19/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Jerrad Goodell
Thanks for the background on the fish sampling history of the creek, I had no idea Bluehead had been caught there before. I think it is a bit of a stretch to list them as a benefiting species right now, but definitely something to keep on the long term radar. I have monitored stream temperatures at 6 locations in the system over the last 30 months, and plan to continue. We can use this long term data in the future to assess the viability of 3-species re-introductions.
Comment 09/02/2025 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thanks for submitting a completion report on time. Since the work hasn't been completed I am going to leave the project in the Current status. After the BDAs are installed please come back to the report and update it with the rest of the work that was done. Be sure to also record BLM in-kind on the finance page. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
02/11/2019
End Date:
06/30/2025
FY Implemented:
2025
Final Methods:
Many hours were spent on addressing the permitting process and it is still on going. As the project was later determined to need a 404 (ACE) and a 401 (EPA) permit in addition to the completed NEPA and completed State of Utah stream alteration permit. These steps have proven to be uncharted, and a learning process was needed to complete the work in the general area. There were 200 BDA post purchased and are ready to be implemented with hand tools such as sledgehammers and shovels using in-house staff and not requiring any additional funds needed to complete the groundwork. The permitting process included the BLM, Trout Unlimited, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, and the Uinta-Ouray Ute Tribe.
Project Narrative:
The project focus was to increase the habitat complexities, continue the presence of water availability for aquatic species and for terrestrial species. Low-tech process techniques are used to improve riparian health, increase habitat complexity and will once the office work of completing permits is completed. Due to the permitting for ground implementation project setbacks were exhibited and hinder the ability for the project to be completed to its fullest extent. The number of structures for the project were increased because of needing to complete a Nation-Wide Permit 27 (NWP 27). A state of Utah permit limits actions to only 300 linear feet of disturbance and NWP 27 allows for up to 500 linear feet of disturbance; it was decided to increase the number of structures to utilize the full effect the applied permit. The additions did not result in the delays or increase the needed permitting experienced.
Future Management:
Future work will consist of placing the structures in the streams with having the official and completed permits in place. Future projects the permitting process should be under way before the WRI presentation to address any concerns from other agencies. These locations were selected as initial sites of address success and feasibility in completing the work in Bitter Creek. The primary target for restoration for success of aquatics species is the mainstem Bitter Creek, which is supporting populations of Brook Trout and Cutthroat Trout. Continue improving the riparian habitat, the availability of water, and increasing the habitat complexity.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8035 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
Project Map
Project Map