Pass Canyon Bighorn Sheep Guzzler
Project ID: 5013
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2020
Submitted By: 60
Project Manager: Kendall Bagley
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Develop two water collection and storage systems to provide water for establishing herd of bighorn sheep as well as other wildlife and livestock. Water collection will consist of a large apron associated with a pond for the water to be stored in, water will then run into a 1.5" HDPE pipeline and service three watering troughs along a 1.5 mile stretch of the pipeline.
Location:
This project would located approximately 4 miles southeast of the town of Leamington, Millard County, on Forest Service land in Wood Canyon, Pass Canyon and along the west foothills of the Canyon Range within the North Pasture of the Fool Creek Allotment. The legal description of the analysis area includes portions of sections 8, 7 and 19 of T. 15S R. 3W and portions of sections 12, 13, 24, 25, and 36 of T 15S R 4W (Figure 1). Elevation ranges between 5,000 and 5,700 feet.
Project Need
Need For Project:
There is a need to increase water availability and distribution across the north end of the Canyon Range for bighorn sheep, cattle, and other wildlife. Currently, there is excess forage that is not being utilized due to limitations of water sources for bighorn sheep and big game species in this range. The development of water catchment and distribution systems would improve habitat suitability and allow wildlife to access these suitable foraging areas. We also have several mines close to the proposed ponds that are being used by bats. The relatively large surface area of these ponds will provide habitat for insects and improve bat foraging habitat. Additionally, providing and restoring water availability for wildlife will increase foraging, thereby reducing natural fuel build-up.
Objectives:
Collect and store enough rainwater allowing us to provide water for up to 150 bighorn sheep, 50 deer, 200 chukar partridge year-round and 150 cattle during summer grazing season. Provide a year-round water source for bats using adjacent mines, small birds and mammals, and reptiles and amphibians. Additional value of this water project will allow for wildlife and livestock to not trail as far for water within the Forest Service Allotments. Additional objective will be to allow this water source to be safe for the big horn sheep allowing them to not seek water where contact with domestic sheep and disease transmission is a possibility.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
As the bighorn population expands north the probability of contact with domestic sheep increases. This is especially true since the nearest water source is the Sevier River and Sevier Canal, which are on or adjacent to private land and within 2 miles of the BLM domestic sheep allotment (see bighorn_anlsysis in Documents). By providing reliable water sources in Pass Canyon and Wood Canyon we hope to hold bighorn in this area and reduce the risk of disease transmission.
Relation To Management Plan:
The pinyon-juniper and big sagebrush areas lie within the MountainSagebrush Steppe Habitat type which is one of the key habitats identified in the WAP (Wildlife Action Plan). The proposed projects will address some of the habitat management strategies outlined in the bighorn sheep, deer and elk management plans for herd unit 21 (Fillmore Oak Creek Unit ) including: *Continue to improve and restore sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer according to DWRs Habitat Initiative. *Maintain habitat quantity and quality at a level adequate to support the stated population objectives while at the same time not resulting in an overall downward trend in range condition and watershed quality. *Work cooperatively with land management agencies and private landowners and or grazing permittee to plan and implement improvement projects for the purpose of enhancing wildlife habitat and livestock range resources in general. *The project also helps fulfill the state mule deer management plan section IV Habitat Goal: Conserve and improve mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. *The proposed projects will address the following goals and objectives of the Division of Wildlife Resources most recent strategic management plan: *Resource Goal: expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. *Objective 1: protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. *Objective 3: conserve sensitive species to prevent them from becoming listed as threatened or endangered. *Constituency Goal: Achieve broad-based support for Division programs and budgets by demonstrating the value of wildlife to all citizens of Utah. *Objective 2: improve communication with wildlife organizations, public officials, private landowners, and government agencies to obtain support for Division programs. *UDWR SR critical big game winter range are important browse communities that need to be enhanced and improved. The Division will employ a variety of methods to achieve this including prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, reseeding and seedling transplants, also mechanical treatments. Priority areas will include sagebrush-steppe and mountain browse communities. Falls within the rangeland focus area for WRI wildlife species for mule deer and elk. Utah Wildlife Action Plan, 2015 Publication Number 15-14, State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources, Effective 2015-2025 -- Promoting and funding restoration that reduces the uncharacteristic and surpluses of older age class, including: Dixie/chain harrow, brush mowing or other treatments that reduce the older age class and stimulate the younger/mid age classes; herbicide or mechanical treatments single tree mulching/cutting of invading conifer. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule deer. Section IV Statewide management goals and objectives. This plan will address Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2013 (p11-12). Strategy C. Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that are being taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats. Strategy f. Encourage land managers to manage portions of pinion-juniper woodlands and aspen/conifer forests in early successional stages. Fillmore Pahvant/Oak Creek Deer Herd Management Plan Unit #21 (2015) - Habitat Management Objectives -- Encourage vegetation manipulation projects and seeding to increase the availability, abundance, and nutritional content of browse, grass, and forb species. Strategies: Habitat Protection, Improvement and Maintenance - Reduce expansion of Pinyon-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinyon-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog and chaining projects; maintain summer fawning areas by increasing beneficial habitat work in summer and transitional habitat areas.(p3-4) Utah Wild Turkey Management Plan Newly treated areas through fire or mechanical means will attract use by wild turkey which are abundant on Oak Creek Management Unit. Insects and new growth will be readily available to support turkey populations, also the availability of more water in the Church Hills and Long Canyon areas. UDWR Wildlife Action Plan This project is geared toward meeting the goals found within this plan for a variety of wildlife species from large to small. The entire proposed project area is found within a UWRI conservation focus area. *This plan is consistent with the Fishlake National Forest Plan for wildlife habitat enhancement and fuels management to improve habitat, reduce fuel loading, and protect against catastrophic wildfire. *Other project have been completed by the Forest Service and UDWR in past years within the Long Canyon and Whiskey Creek HUC 12 area. *Project within the are also benefit the management plans objectives of the lower Sevier River Watershed, as this will reduced sediment run off and create a healthy rangeland communities. *Management Plans are also in conjunction with NRCS overall goals of healthy rangelands and communities, improving watersheds and reducing erosion and sediment. The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment *FFSL CWPP Process is a local Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) is a collaborative plan created by the fire department, state and local forestry, land managers, community leaders, and the public.The planning process maps values at risk, and requires actions to reduce risk, such as prescribed burning, fuel reduction, or other measures that adapt a community to better confront their wildfire threat. *Area is also part of the Millard RWPP FFSL Plan which was implemented in 2014, there are Wildfire Codes and Ordinances associated with this plan. Project would also be relevant to NCS Goals and supported through the FS National Cohesive Strategies. CAT FIRE Objectives and Strategies: In 2013, the State of Utah developed the Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy (CAT FIRE) in response to the severe 2012 fire season. Reducing the catastrophic wildfire requires attention to three interdependent goals identified in the National Cohesive Wildfire Management Strategy -- Restore and Maintain Landscapes, Fire Adapted Communities, and Wildfire Response. These goals have been embraced throughout the development of the state's CAT FIRE strategy. Mitigation of hazardous fuels can change fire behavior making it easier to suppress. The effects of the mitigation, however, are not limited to life and property safety but will also affect forest health, water quality, vegetative species abundance, etc. As we continue to implement projects across the landscapes in Utah, the only way to truly be successful is to integrate existing programs, utilize local and federal partners and continue to educate the general public to create the desired shift towards more resilient communities and ecosystems. We have also added to the documents tab the Millard County Plan that addresses these types of habitat projects along with edits from the State of Utah Resource Management Plan. **Attached below is information from the Statewide Bighorn Sheep Plan: Bighorn sheep are uniquely adapted to inhabit some of the most remote and rugged areas in Utah. They exist in some of the most hostile climatic conditions ranging from the hot, dry canyonlands of southern Utah to the cold, snowy alpine regions of Utah's northern mountains. Bighorns are sometimes referred to as a wilderness species because of the naturally remote and inaccessible areas they inhabit. Bighorns prefer open habitat types with adjacent steep rocky areas for escape and safety. Habitat is characterized by rugged terrain including canyons, gulches, talus cliffs, steep slopes, mountaintops, and river benches (Shackleton et al. 1999). The diet of mountain sheep is comprised primarily of grasses and forbs, although sheep may also utilize shrubs depending on season and availability. Most Rocky Mountain bighorns typically have seasonal migrations with established winter and summer ranges, whereas most desert bighorns generally do not have distinct summer and winter migrations. Extensive historical bighorn habitat occurs throughout Utah (Figure 1). However, not all habitat is currently suitable for reestablishment of bighorn populations. Vegetative changes, human encroachment, and domestic sheep grazing make some areas unsuitable for bighorn restoration. Habitat management practices include voluntary grazing allotment conversions from domestic sheep to cattle, vegetative treatments, and water developments. UDWR considers grazing conversions and restrictions "involuntary" when the party negotiating for the conversion/restriction threatens to seek more burdensome grazing restrictions, reductions, or conversions in court or through other regulatory means unless the livestock grazer consents to the requested conversion/restriction. UDWR, in partnership with conservation groups and land managers has been extremely helpful in negotiating, funding, and participating in habitat projects. Habitat Degradation or Loss: Bighorn habitat can be degraded, fragmented, or lost to a variety of causes including human disturbance, energy development, and natural succession. Reductions in the quality or quantity of habitat can result in corresponding losses to bighorn populations (DeForge 1972, Hamilton et al. 1982). Human disturbance may cause bighorn sheep to change use areas and abandon certain habitats because of those disturbances. Loss of preferred habitat can compel bighorns into habitats that reduce productivity, decrease survival rates, and increase risk of pathogen transmission. Human disturbance is also thought to be a possible stress inducer, which may lead to disease problems in some populations (DeForge 1981, Bunch et al. 1999). Working with federal land management agencies to protect the habitat needed for healthy herds may improve herd health. Plant succession can also dramatically affect habitat quality. Encroachment by pinyon-juniper and other shrubs has resulted in the fragmentation and loss of large expanses of bighorn habitat. Vegetative treatments, including fire management and mechanical treatments, can restore and improve bighorn habitat to its condition prior to settlement times. Habitat Management Goal: Provide good quality habitat for healthy populations of bighorn sheep. Objective: Maintain or improve bighorn sheep habitat to enhance individual herd success and thereby promote the overall sustainability of bighorn sheep statewide. Strategies: a. Identify valuable bighorn sheep habitats and work with land managers and private landowners to protect and enhance these areas. b. Assist land management agencies in monitoring bighorn sheep habitat. Habitat monitoring by the land management agencies will be contingent on available funding and personnel. c. Work with land managers to minimize and mitigate loss of bighorn habitat due to human disturbance and development. d. Initiate vegetative treatment projects to improve bighorn habitat lost to natural succession or human impacts. e. Under the correct circumstances, encourage land management agencies to allow fires to burn when such action improves bighorn sheep habitat. f. Improve or maintain existing water sources and develop new water sources as needed to improve distribution and abundance of bighorn sheep. g. Support research and monitoring efforts to evaluate bighorn sheep use of water sources to ensure the water sources are having the desired effect. h. Work with land management agencies and private landowners to voluntarily implement agency guidelines for management of domestic sheep and goats in bighorn areas similar to those proposed by the WAWFA Wild Sheep Working Group. i. Support conservation groups' efforts to pursue willing conversions of domestic sheep grazing allotments by working with willing permittees in bighorn areas to minimize the risk of pathogen transmission. j. Inform and educate the public concerning the needs of bighorn sheep including the effects of human disturbance and the need for habitat improvements. k. Create preferred habitat for bighorn sheep in areas not proximate to domestic sheep and goats to attract bighorns away from risks of pathogen transmission.
Fire / Fuels:
N/A. In the summer of 2018 the Wood Canyon Fire burned in this area, through the efforts of UDWR, Fillmore Forest Service and WRI we applied for funding to reseed this area with forbs, and grasses that will benefit the Bighorn Sheep, Mule Deer, Elk and Domestic Cattle in the future. During the Wood Canyon Fire all structures of pinyon and juniper type habitats was destroyed allowing for additional forage to support Bighorn Sheep in the future and increase the potential habitat for them to flourish.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Each guzzler will collect 125,000 gallons of water annually and store it in lined-ponds with a 150,000 gallon capacity. Ponds will be fenced to exclude all large animals. We don't anticipate litter and debris getting into the ponds and reducing water quality to be a problem. Water will be piped from ponds to troughs that wildlife and livestock will access. Troughs will have float valves backed up by safety values to regulate the water level and protect the supply. Each pond will be fenced reducing the opportunity for big game animals to become trapped in the pond, reducing the risk of death and injury. Information from Millard County Resource Management Plan: Millard County desires to protect and enhance the quality and quantity of useable water by promoting and expanding the efficient management of water resources. The County supports the development, adoption, and implementation of water storage and distribution plans by individuals, irrigation companies, industrial users, and municipalities. #2 Objective: Millard County supports and participation in responsible Federal and State land water resource management activities.
Compliance:
Fillmore Forest Service completed the Fool Creek Wildlife Water Improvement Project in 2018. This project was completed under the CE allowing the project to move forward. The USFS Decision Memo is attached.
Methods:
We propose constructing two wildlife water guzzler aprons with storage ponds and pipelines of approximately 2.5 miles in length per pond with at least 3 and up to 5 water troughs/drinkers per pipeline. One guzzler will be constructed in Wood Canyon and the other in Pass Canyon; both ponds will have pipelines coming out of the canyons to the west following the foothills going south. Construction of water development sites are located in areas with suitable habitat and currently lacking sufficient water. Water developments will consist of guzzlers designed for rainwater collection and storage in lined holding ponds, each with a capacity up to 125,000 gallons. Water will then be dispersed through a pipeline to water troughs for wildlife use. Each water development site will be less than an approximate one acre footprint and constructed over a 1-3 year period. Ground and vegetation disturbance will be minimized to protect habitat characteristics. No road construction is needed and water piping will be buried where possible. Troughs will be designed to meet the needs and safety of wildlife providing access/escape ramps for bird, small mammals, and amphibians.
Monitoring:
Trail cameras will be installed to monitor wildlife and livestock use. Many of the bighorn have gps collars and we will have at least of year of location data prior to construction. Monitoring of the apron, pond and water troughs will also be provided by the grazing permittee and the Fillmore Forest Service making sure all troughs are in good working order and the fence is up and in good shape.
Partners:
Partnerships for this project will include UDWR, USFS Fillmore Ranger District and Spence Butler (rancher/permittee). Partners have been in contact with each other and are supportive of this project. The need for water is critical and the support from the Federal, State and Grazing permittee allows projects like this to be successful. This project will not negatively impact the grazing permittee but will allow for increased water storage of for livestock. UDWR is working with Fillmore Forest Service in completing additional projects like these in the next several years, which will allow for important water sources to be developed to benefit wildlife in the future on the Oak Creek.
Future Management:
The Fillmore Ranger District has installed mulitiple guzzlers and water improvements over the last 5 years. They are constantly searching and learning where habitat improvements needs to be made to enhance ecosystems to ensure healthy and viable wildlife populations. They will continue to look for opportunities to install guzzlers in areas where drought conditions and climate change have minimized water opportunities for wildlife.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The ponds will be fenced to exclude livestock and large animals and provide major benefits to bats, reptiles, amphibians and other smaller wildlife. The addition of water to these areas will allow efficient use of habitat and grazing resources that are currently not available to wildlife and livestock. The improvements to livestock distribution will enhance long-term sustainable use of forage resources on the north end of the Canyon Mountains. In addition the opportunity for the public viewing of bighorn sheep in the area is a possibility, family recreation occurs in this area along with hunting of mule deer, elk and chukar will also be a benefit to the general public. It is not uncommon for ATV and UTV recreation to occur as well as camping and sight seeing.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$128,250.00 $0.00 $128,250.00 $33,500.00 $161,750.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
NEPA NEPA Expenses from Fillmore Forest Service towards the Fool Creek Wildlife Water Project. $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2020
Personal Services (permanent employee) In-kind coming from the Fillmore Forest Service towards the project, personal services, truck usage, monitoring, and implementation $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2020
Materials and Supplies Expenses for two (2) apron liners 125' x 150' HDPE Material, along with two (2) pond liners 50' x 50' x 10' EPDM. Also includes the materials and supplies needed to complete the project. $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Materials and Supplies Expenses for the six (6) tire troughs. total gallons 1,100, with added materials and labor for install. Est. $850.00/each $0.00 $0.00 $5,500.00 2020
Materials and Supplies Expenses for the 1.5" HDPE pipe, along with install expenses. for 4.4 miles at $2.25/foot $51,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Materials and Supplies Fencing Materials for two (2) 250' x 250' exclosures to be installed around the pond and the apron. Estimated $7.00/FT for 2,000 feet $8,500.00 $0.00 $5,500.00 2020
Contractual Services Expenses for the excavation of the pond and liner, along with labor, fuel, and equipment to complete the job. $18,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Seed (not from GBRC) Forest Service provided seed to be used on the project. $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 2020
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$152,266.22 $0.00 $152,266.22 $34,820.21 $187,086.43
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) S025 $2,055.55 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Safari Club International S026 $2,055.55 $0.00 $0.00 2020
United States Forest Service (USFS) Fillmore Forest Service expenses and in-kind towards the project. Will come in the form of materials, supplies, seed and labor. $0.00 $0.00 $33,500.00 2020
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation S022 $24,655.95 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $34,310.89 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation S022 $35,344.05 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) S025 $2,944.45 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Safari Club International S026 $2,944.45 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $23,939.11 $0.00 $0.00 2020
Habitat Council Account QHCR $14,153.12 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Habitat Council Account $9,863.10 $0.00 $0.00 2022
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $98.08 2022
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $1,222.13 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bighorn Sheep N4 R2
Threat Impact
Disease – Alien Organisms Very High
Bighorn Sheep N4 R2
Threat Impact
Livestock Farming and Ranching High
Chukar R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Chukar R3
Threat Impact
Water Developments for Livestock Low
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Habitats
Habitat
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Project Comments
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Kendall, I commend you for designing a project with bats in mind. Will there be any effort to protect these ponds from overuse by livestock or undulates? I see no seed mix listed. Will there be any effort to reseed areas disturbed by construction activities? Keith
Comment 02/11/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Keith, Thanks for the comments, in the proposal we will be fencing the ponds and aprons from cattle and wildlife, as far as seeding the disturbed areas the Forest Service will be providing some seed for this, we have listed it in the finance section under the FS in-kind. Thanks for your insight on the project.
Comment 02/12/2019 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Keith, just to clarify the ponds will be fenced to exclude basically anything bigger than a jackrabbit. So ungulates will be provided water from troughs/drinkers and won't be able to access the ponds themselves. Small animals and birds will still be able to access the ponds.
Comment 08/16/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Update your map features and fill out the completion form. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Comment 08/23/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please take some time to proof read and edit your completion report. Thanks.
Comment 08/25/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion form on time. It looks great. Thanks for uploading pictures!
Completion
Start Date:
05/05/2020
End Date:
07/15/2021
FY Implemented:
2022
Final Methods:
Final Methods for the Pass Canyon Guzzler Project included the installation of three (3) rubber tire troughs along with 11,700 feet of HDPE 1.5" pipeline, plus the construction of a 180' x 200' apron and a 150,000 gallon pond. The apron and pond were lined with HDPE material that will act as a rain and snow catchment and allow for water storage in the summer months. The water stored in the pond will then be allowed into the water line and provide a critical water source for cattle and wildlife on the northwest end of the Oak Creek Mtn Range. Final Methods for the Rocky Ridge portion of this project was to provide six (6) watering troughs, a spring development, and the installation of 13,300' of 1.5" HDPE pipe. This project will replace an existing older worn out pipeline on the USFS allotment southeast of Oak City, Utah. This water is critical for wildlife such as bighorn sheep, elk, mule deer, turkeys and chuckers as well as providing critical summer water to livestock.
Project Narrative:
This project was in cooperation with the USFS Fillmore Field Office, UDWR and the Utah Wild Sheep Foundation conservation group. This project was proposed and developed to add additional water storage and water troughs for big horn sheep, mule deer, elk and upland game birds like chukars and wild turkeys. This project is also critical to provide needed water for livestock on the west end of the Oak Creek Mtn Range in Central Utah. This project has two working parts to it, the first part of this project consisted of installing a 180' x 200' large apron lined in HDPE material that would act as a water catchment to collect rain and snow fall. Water would then be stored in a HDPE lined 150,000 gallon pond to service three (3) rubber tire troughs connected together by 11,700' of 1.5" HDPE pipe . The second part of this project consisted of installing six (6) rubber tire troughs and over 13,300' of 1.5" HDPE pipeline. Construction of this project involved several different partnerships and contractors, some of which included: Thirstycows.com who installed all the HDPE pipeline, and set the nine (9) rubber tire troughs. USFS Road Department who worked to construct the apron and storage pond, and get it prepped for the installation of the HDPE material. A special thanks to Clay Bundy Construction and Kody Smith Construction with their help on the installation of the HDPE material to line the apron pad and pond. A special thanks goes out to the Fillmore USFS Field Office for the many man hours that went into this project and the 24 employees that showed up on the day we installed the HDPE liner. This was a great success, we are hopeful that we will continue to receive additional water this fall and winter to store for the coming spring/summer.
Future Management:
Future Management of this project will be the responsibilities of the USFS Fillmore Field Office, they will be monitoring the apron, pond and watering troughs to make sure they are in good working order. The USFS is going to construct a high fence around the pond and apron portions of the project to protect it from wildlife and cattle getting stuck or damaging the apron. The three (3) water troughs will be overseen by the livestock grazer and the USFS to make sure they are in good working condition and functioning properly. Water that is caught during rain storms or winter snow events will be stored in the 150,000 gallon pond. The water will then be used on the grazing allotment, and for wildlife species such as mule deer, bighorn sheep, elk and chukars. In the Rocky Ridge area of the project we installed six (6) rubber tire troughs along with 13,300 feet of HDPE pipeline, this water project will be managed by the USFS and the grazing permittees to make sure the spring location, troughs and pipeline is in good working order for livestock and wildlife such as big horn sheep, mule deer, turkeys, chukars and elk.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
995 Pipeline Construction Below surface
996 Fence Construction Net wire
1884 Water development point feature Construction Trough
1885 Water development point feature Construction Trough
2371 Water development point feature Construction Trough
2372 Water development point feature Construction Trough
2374 Water development point feature Construction Pond Cleaning
Project Map
Project Map