Parley's Canyon Watershed Restoration Project
Project ID: 5122
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: 538
Project Manager: Robert Edgel
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Central Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Central
Description:
This project will work to improve watershed health in Parley's Canyon by reducing fire risk to communities and infrastructure, improve crucial fish and wildlife habitat and populations, and increase water quality and quantity, and sustainability of natural resources. It will accomplish these objectives through a collaborative partnership and by treating all aspects of the watershed from the upland conifer/aspen stands to the sagebrush/oakbrush plant communities and the riparian stream bottoms.
Location:
Located in Parley's Canyon Watershed; mostly in Lambs Canyon, Toll Canyon, Snyderville Basin, and the mountains above Summit Park community and surrounding canyons. Township 1S Range 3E
Project Need
Need For Project:
This project will work to improve the overall health of the entire watershed in Parley's Canyon. To accomplish this there has been lots of coordination and planning between many landowners and interest groups to accomplish a landscape scale restoration project. Since the pioneers came through these Wasatch Front canyons in the mid 1800's to settle in the Salt Lake valley there have been many changes to the forest and ecosystem in Parley's Canyon. Fire has been suppressed and resulted in hundreds of years of dead fuels on the ground and unnatural old growth forests of thick conifer. This has essentially resulted in a tinder box of fuels ready to explode if conditions are just right. This is extremely concerning for people who live in communities in Lambs Canyon, Summit Park, Jeremy Ranch, Park City, and Mount Aire. Billions of dollars worth of property damage can occur and lives will be threatened if a catastrophic fire occurs in this area without efforts to reduce fuel loads, build fire breaks, and create defensible space. There is a great need to build defensible space around homes, cabins, infrastructure, and roads. This will not only keep residents safe but also help keep firefighters safe who will be asked to risk their lives in defense of this property. This project will work to address and minimize these threats. This project will also work to improve the health of the forest by thinning conifers stands that are encroaching on struggling aspen stands. The aspen in this watershed are beginning to die off from disease and insect infestations. This is probably a result of competition with conifer and older trees that are more susceptible to disease.This project will help to reduce the competition of conifers and allow more water for struggling aspen. By increasing the aspen stands we will also create more diversity of habitat and provide more food for wildlife. From historic overgrazing and removal of beavers the streams and riparian systems have been damaged and critical pond habitats have been lost. This project will use beaver dam analogs (BDAs) to repair some of this damaged down-cut and incised stream channels, restore pond habitat, and increase riparian vegetation. This will benefit many wildlife and fish species. It will also increase water quantity and quality. The healthier and larger riparian areas will also act as a fire break to prevent the spread of catastrophic wildfire. The BDAs will also help catch sediment and slow water flows post fires to reduce downstream damage and flooding. From historic livestock grazing and nearby human developments there have been many introductions of noxious weeds into this watershed. This project will work to combat these weeds before they spread and take over the biotic community and reduce the health of the watershed. One such weed is garlic mustard. Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) is classified as a 1b Early Detection rapid response species on the Utah Noxious weed list because of it's threat to our forest ecosystems and limited distribution in the state. It is able to form monospecific stands that dominate the understory of even relatively undisturbed forests and actively displace native understory plant species. We have identified locations of this weed and we need to act now to stop its spread. Another weed of concern is myrtle spurge. Myrtle spurge is a Utah state noxious weed not only because of it's caustic sap which is considered a public health threat, but also because it displaces native vegetation. It's rapid expansion throughout the wildland urban interface along the Wasatch front in the last decade, has alarmed residents and local land managers alike, and continues to draw quite a bit of public and media attention every spring. Myrtle spurge infestations have further exasperated threats to our watershed and public lands, by increasing the potential for erosion and sedimentation in our creeks and streams from run off. This project will work to remove these weeds from the watershed. Lastly, this is an important area for recreation from skiing, hiking, fishing, camping, and hunting since it is so close to SLC. A large part of Utah's economy is driven by this recreation and protecting this watershed will help preserve those uses and sustain our economy.
Objectives:
This project has multiple objectives designed to address all of the priorities of WRI and the Shared Stewardship program and to treat all aspects of watershed health in Parley's Canyon. 1. Protect the lives of residents and firefighters from catastrophic wildfire 2. Reduce fire risk to communities and infrastructure and reduce costs of post fire rehabilitation 3. Improve forest health 3. Remove noxious weeds from the watershed 4. Improve fish and wildlife habitat, especially for boreal toad and Bonneville cutthroat trout. 5. Improve water quality and increase water quantity 6. Conduct monitoring to measure success of project and to help gather data to address threats to WAP species. 7. Conduct a project that addresses objectives multiple management plans. 8. Increase forage for livestock where grazing is possible. 9. Increase and protect recreational opportunities such as skiing, hunting, fishing, and other outdoor recreation.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
By not doing this project now we risk crossing ecological thresholds that will take millions of more dollars and hundreds of years to recover from. This is also probably one of the most at risk areas in our state for a catastrophic fire. Putting this project off for later down the road could prove tragic. 1. By not doing this project there is greater risk for a catastrophic fire that will cross ecological thresholds and destroy communities, life, and infrastructure. Every year that we do not treat this area the threat of this increases and we are just rolling the dice until a catastrophe occurs. 2. The damage to crucial Bonneville cutthroat populations from a fire and subsequent sediment deposition in Lambs Creek and surrounding streams would be extremely damaging to the UDWR and sportsman's efforts to restore cutthroat. 3. The loss of potential benefit to wildlife and aquatic species by not restoring aspen/forest health and stream health may lead to a decrease in populations. Recovering these species after they are lost will be extremely difficult. 4. To recover this ecosystem after allowing noxious weeds like garlic mustard and myrtle spurge to spread unchecked may be impossible. We have to act now to do all we can to prevent these non native plants from spreading and out-competing the native vegetation. 5. The cost of large debree flows that would likely result after a fire and damage a major highway in Parley's Canyon could result in billions of dollars worth of damage to repair. It would change the ecosystem for a long time. The cost of doing this project is nothing compared to the billions of dollars in costs that could come from not doing this project.
Relation To Management Plan:
This project complies with guidance and addresses objectives outlined in the following management plans: 1. The Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) Conservation Plan (Utah Division of Wildlife Resources 2005) 3.1 Fire Management. 3.1.1 Protect habitats in forest stands adjacent to and within 2.5 miles of breeding sites. 3.1.2 Restrict burns to late fall through early spring during which time boreal toads are inactive in known occupied areas. 3.1.3 Determine impacts of fire through monitoring of known breeding sites. 3.2 Habitat Fragmentation. 3.2.1 Prevent further habitat fragmentation of breeding populations. 3.2.1.a Identify and preserve dispersal corridors. 3.2.1.b Identify and preserve metapopulation structure. 3.2.2. Restore historic dispersal corridors where possible. 3.2.2.a Identify where migration and gene flow among occupied habitats should be facilitated. 32 3.2.2.b Improve habitat conditions in degraded dispersal corridors where appropriate 3.3.1.c Minimize depletion of boreal toad prey base. 3.3.1.d Minimize degradation of bank conditions. 3.3.1.e Minimize degradation of water quality. 3.3.1.f Minimize depletion of emergent and riparian vegetation. 3.9.2 Minimize habitat loss and degradation associated with water management. 3.9.2.a Minimize stream channelization. 3.9.3 Create, restore, and maintain new habitats through water management. 3.9.3.a Create shallow shoreline margins in new impoundments. 3.9.3.b Deepen impoundments to maintain sufficient water levels through metamorphosis. 3.9.3.c Create new wetlands according to boreal toad breeding habitat requirements. 2. Deer Herd Unit 17a Management Plan 1. Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the unit by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. 2. Seek cooperative projects to improve the quality and quantity of deer habitat. 3. Provide improved habitat security and escapement opportunities for deer Future habitat work should be concentrated on the following areas.: 4. Quaking aspen forests unit wide. We will be working in the quaking aspen stands to reduce conifer competition. 5. Anywhere along the front that would avert deer from entering cities. By improving the habitat condition up higher in the canyon we will hopefully keep deer from going down into the city. 3. Wildlife Action Plan 1. Under the threats, data gaps, and action section of the plan it identifies a list of Essential Conservation Actions. It states the need to restore and improve degraded wildlife habitats. species and others. 2. The habitat type that this project is located in as identified in the WAP is the aquatic scrub/shrub type, forested aquatics, and riverine. We will be improving the habitat in this key habitat and addressing the threats to this habitat type. 3. The plan identifies sediment transport imbalance as a medium threat to this habitat type and this project will help to reduce sediment transport by stabilizing the banks with vegetation and rocks. 4.It identifies channel down-cutting as a high threat and this project will help to remove the channels in the stream and make a more subtle gradient. This project will raise the water levels to restore the floodplain and reduce this channel down-cutting. 5. The plan mentions a management strategy that this project addresses to help improve this habitat type through 1.( restoring more natural water and sediment flow regimes) WAP Ch. 7-1; Mountain Riparian Habitat, criteria and score totals (ch. 7-8) 3rd highest priority statewide. Ch. 6-15; Western Toad; threat - 4. Statewide Moose Management Plan 1. Population Management Goal: Achieve optimum populations of moose in all suitable habitat within the state. 2. Habitat Management Goal: Assure sufficient habitat is available to sustain healthy and productive moose populations. 3. Recreation Goal: Provide high-quality opportunities for hunting and viewing of moose. 5. Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan Habitat Objective1: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019. 6. Statewide Elk Managment Plan 1. Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. 2. Maintain sufficient habitat to support elk herds at population objectives and reduce competition for forage between elk and livestock. 7. Salt Lake County Integrated Watershed Management Plan 1. Identifies stream restoration as a priority implementation task Pg. 10 This project through the BDA work will help to achieve this task. 2. It identifies Parley's Creek as a priority watershed. 3. The plan identifies improving habitat as a priority. Pg 80 8. Parleys Creek Management Plan http://www.slcdocs.com/utilities/Stream%20Study%20website/Parleys/Final/7_Projects_Parleys.pdf 1. Pg.15 Goal: Improve Riparian Habitat through Control of Invasive Plant Species and Restoration of Native Plant Communities 2. Action: Initiate invasive plant removal/control efforts in city-owned riparian corridor areas, beginning upstream and working downstream, utilizing an integrated weed control strategy. 9. Snyderville Basin Special Recreation Open Space Management Guidelines 2019 10. Summit Park Forest Stewardship Plan 2018: Manage forest resources in the best interest of forest health, which should minimize losses associated with injurious insects and diseases. Detection and monitoring will be key components in minimizing forest pest impacts. Maintain or enhance wildlife use and habitat. Maintain favorable aesthetics by means of preventing large scale tree mortality. Adhere to the Forest Legacy Deed of Conservation Easement parameters. Actively manage to reduce the control/spread of noxious weeds, found throughout the property. 11. Snyderville Basin Special Recreation Trails Master Plan 2019: (3) Provide and support a diversity of trail experiences: Objective 3C: Beyond the types of trail uses accommodated, consider a variety of user objectives in the planning, design, and construction of new trails. Objectives could include: Nature-viewing, Escape, Solitude, Challenge, Risk, Fun, Play, Exercise, Connectivity, Socializing. (4) Develop a sustainable trail system in an environmentally responsible way: Objective 4A: Secure and budget sufficient, dependable annual maintenance funding for the community-wide trail system. Seek out partnerships with other organizations to share and leverage trail maintenance resources. 12. Summit County Code: 10-4-3: Critical Lands, 10-4-7 (A): Fire Protection Fuel Breaks/Vegetation Manipulation: Hazardous fuels in the form of native vegetation will be cleared around structures and around the perimeter of the development to assist in wildfire prevention measures. This fuel break is not intended as a complete vegetation clearing firebreak. 13. Summit County Snyderville Basin General Plan: Goals: (1) Preservation of open space, view corridors and scenic mountainsides, (2) preservation of Critical Lands (as defined in Section 10-4-3 of the Code) natural resources and the environment, including clean air and water. Community Vision: (1) Open Space, (2) Recreation, (4) Wildlife, (6) Critical Land Protection, (7) Water Conservation and (11) Natural Resource Preservation. Policy 5.22: Wildfire Management. Policy 5.23: Wildlife 14. Utah Administrative Code R68-9 (Utah's Noxious Weed Act): Utah Noxious Weed Act and the Summit County Code, Title 4, Chapter 4. The Act states that local governments are directed to take the necessary steps to manage the noxious weeds within their jurisdiction and provides specific authorization for local enforcement. 15. Utah Forest Action Plan 2016: Distribute materials to community members, individual landowners, public officials, interagency partners and media for further dissemination and outreach. Increase participation in state and national programs including Utah Living with Fire, Ready, Set, Go!, Firewise USA and Fire-Adaptive Communities. Use all available management tools, including forest industry, to restore and maintain healthy ecosystems. 16. Treatments lie within Central Region UPCD/UWRI focus areas. 17. UDWR Strategic Management Plan Objective R2 Maintain existing wildlife habitat and increase the quality of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. Objective R4 Decrease risks to species and their habitats through integrated implementation of the WAP, Objective C6 Increase hunting and fishing opportunities 18. Utah Shared Stewardship Agreement (May 2019) - Project is within Shared Stewardship priority areas. We have applied for Shared Stewardship as well and working with USFS and FFSL to do this. Meets objectives to reduce hazardous fuels.
Fire / Fuels:
If you look at the Shared Stewardship layer you will also see that this project is largely within the high priority area for Shared Stewardship. This is because fire has been suppressed and resulted in hundreds of years of dead fuels on the ground and old growth forests of thick conifer. This has essentially resulted in a tinder box of fuels ready to explode if conditions are just right. If you look at the map with the fire risk tool it shows most of the projects area is within extremely high risk areas. This is extremely concerning for people who live in communities in Lambs Canyon, Summit Park, Jeremy Ranch, Park City, and Mount Aire. Billions of dollars worth of property damage can occur and lives will be threatened. This project will begin the process of thinning this forest and reducing the fuel loads to reduce the fire danger and make it safer for communities and fire fighters. This project will also pave the way for future fire risk reduction efforts including possibly controlled burns through the USFS. The BDAs and stream restoration will also help increase riparian wet areas and green vegetation which will act as green strips or fire breaks to slow and stop catastrophic fire spread.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The project area is within the Salt Lake City watershed which provides water to millions of people it is one of the most valuable water sources in our State. This should be considered when evaluating the importance of protecting this watershed compared to other projects in remote areas that may not have such high populations downstream or as many users dependent on it. We need to do everything we can to protect the quality and quantity of this water. By thinning conifer stands we will be reducing the amount of water that these trees take from the system. This will add water to the watershed and provide healthier greener vegetation and more water for users down stream. By reducing fire risk we will reduce the potential for large debris flows and contamination of water sources post fire. This could be extremely detrimental to SLC water supply quality and quantity of drinking water as debris would fill pipes and cost millions of dollars in repairs and potentially cut off water supply to thousands of homes. By doing work to improve the health of the streams through BDAs we will be capturing sediments that would otherwise flow downstream and reduce water quality. Also, it has been shown that BDAs help store more water in the watershed longer and will increase the quantity of water throughout the year. Improvements due to forest thinning: Toll Canyon Creek and the greater Summit Park area all drain into the East Canyon Creek (Weber watershed). Reduction of conifers should increase available water within the stand and may increase ephemeral water flow. Improvements due to improved riparian corridors: The impacts of wildfire on riparian habitats is varied, but there is evidence that healthy riparian corridors can serve to halt the spread of wildfires. In-tact, healthy riparian corridors are more resilient to wildfires because riparian vegetation such as willows and cottonwoods thrive after disturbance. In-tact root systems in riparian corridors stabilize streambanks and are more resilient to flooding (i.e., down-cutting and incision), if and when post-fire rains erode into waterways. Conversely, degraded riparian corridors are not resilient to wildfire; they will require extensive efforts to restore vegetation and hydrologic function (i.e., deep incision and down-cutting). Riparian habitats can be resilient to wildfire and generally do not require extensive restoration (Halofsky and Hibbs 2009).
Compliance:
This project will inclde funds to help the USFS to complete all necessary cultural and biological clearances for NEPA that will allow for this work to be done. All necessary stream alteration permitting has been done or will be done before BDAs will be constructed. All cultural resources necessary for work on private land will be done before work begins.
Methods:
Forest Management We will use FFSL, UFA, and other crews alongside contractors to cut and chip trees and brush around homes and infrastructure. This will allow for more defensible space and protection of roads so firefighters can access safely areas. The project in the next phase after cultural clearances are done will also cut, pile, and burn dead or dying conifer throughout the forest that has been impacted by insect kill. In some of the very steep areas near Summit Park we will also include some logging with ground crews. Because of the steepness of the terrain we will utilize helicopters or safety cable attached machinery to remove logs to a loading site where they will be hauled away. Lastly, we will do cultural and botanical surveys that will allow for NEPA to be completed much quicker on USFS lands in the canyon. This will allow us to do many different treatments of forest thinning to reduce fuels with hand crews and possibly prescribed fire in the future. Weed Control Best management practices for garlic mustard include an integrated pest management strategy of both chemical and manual control, combined with active monitoring, and persistent surveillance. Plants are self pollinating and germinate throughout the growing season, therefore require constant monitoring and at least 2 chemical applications per season, with manual control of bolted flowering plants prior to seeding. Chemical applications to rosettes include a mix of metsulfuron and 2,4-D, and should be applied in both the spring and fall. Best management practices for myrtle spurge include both manual removal and chemical control in the early spring prior to seed dispersal. In areas where plants are growing on steep slopes and manual removal could increase erosion, chemical control is preferred using a mix of 2,4-D and dicamba with a surfactant. If the plants can be removed manually with limited disturbance to soils, best management practices include removing at least 4" of the root with care not to get the sap in the eyes or on skin. Manual removal can be a preferred form of management, given that myrtle spurge if often found growing under, around, and interspersed with scrub oak and other native plants. Seed Application Seed will be hand braodcasted with seeders in areas at the mouth of Parley's Canyon where we are trying to control myrtle spurge. Seed will help fill the niche that myrtle spurge is filling and hopefully help in control of myrtle spurge. Beaver Dam Analog Construction We will construct the BDAs with sharpened lodgepole fence posts, approximately 3-4" diameter. They will be driven into the stream bed with a gas post pounder or hydraulic post pounder. The posts will extend about 1 m above the channel bed. The posts will be spaced approximately 0.5 - 0.8 m apart, and driven to a depth of approximately 1 m into the streambed. We will then weave willow branches or other tree branches that are available onsite between the posts to create a structure that will look like a beaver dam. The willows will help to slow the water but will also allow fish to pass through. We will then reinforce the posts with stream bed material at the base of the posts. The idea is that the dams will last until sediment is piled up at the dam and vegetation begins to grow and the stream channel rises and floods. We will place dams about 30 m apart, depending on where they need to go. After a year we will assess the health of the stream again and determine what progress has been made and where future BDAs need to be placed. Once sediment has built up behind the dam we will plant vegetation as needed to speed up recovery and have the roots hold that built up sediment in place.
Monitoring:
Forest Health Monitoring will consist of repeat photography at designated points and vegetation plots to determine trees per acre and species composition. Each vegetation plot will estimate both over-story and under-story vegetation change for percent cover, tree density and species richness. Monitoring will occur before treatment, one year after treatment and five years after treatment. Stream Restoration: Effectiveness of stream restoration (e.g., BDAs) will be monitored with the Rapid Stream-Riparian Assessment (RSRA) survey (see attached). The RSRA generates a score for water quality, hydrogeomorphology, fish and aquatic habitat, riparian vegetation, and terrestrial wildlife habitat. This method was selected because it is a time and cost efficient means to monitor restoration projects. Wild Utah Project biologists and their volunteers will conduct the RSRA surveys before and after restoration. In addition to this data Salt Lake County has been collecting water quality data in Lambs Canyon for many years. So we will already have many years of pre treatment data to compare to post treatment. Salt Lake COunty will continue this monitoring that is a significant in kind contribution. Boreal Toad: To assess conditions for boreal toads, we will do pre- and post-project aquatic habitat surveys based on Utah's standardized field protocol (attached). The data will be included in the long-term dataset managed by Wild Utah Project, Hogle Zoo, and Utah Geologic Survey. Based on results, boreal toad re-introduction sites will be selected and prioritized. Monitoring for garlic mustard include an integrated pest management strategy of both chemical and manual control, combined with active monitoring, and persistent surveillance. Plants are self pollinating and germinate throughout the growing season, therefore require constant monitoring and at least 2 chemical applications per season,
Partners:
UDWR Habitat Restoration Biologist, Robby Edgel, has been coordinating efforts between multiple landowners and interest groups in Parley's Canyon to bring a landscape scale watershed restoration project. USFS, Bekee Hotze (Salt Lake District Ranger), Guy Wilson (USFS), Scott Frost (USFS), Justin Robinson (USFS), Karen Hartmen (USFS) and Brian Trick (Wasatch Front Area Manager) from FFSL, Dax Reid (FFSL), Robert Sanders (FFSL), Scott Zeidler (FFSL), and PJ Abraham(FFSL) have been involved in planning the Shared Stewardship/Forest Health aspects of the project on USFS lands in Parley's Canyon. They have been instrumental in educating the public and planning the work to be done in the canyon. They also have been heavily involved in collaboration on the project proposal to apply for funds through WRI and the Shared Stewardship program. Jessica Kirby (Open Space Management Supervisor)) from Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District has been the lead in planning all the work around Summit Park and gaining public support and funding from the County. Through her efforts Summit County has become a significant partner and has already contributed over $250,000 to this project. She has been working with PJ Abraham from FFSL to plan the fuel treatments around Summit Park. She also has been partnering with Trout Unlimited to plan BDA work in Toll Canyon and East Canyon. She has also gained funding through the NRCS to do work. Janice Gardner and Mary Pendergast from Wild Utah Project are partnering on this project to help with the monitoring of stream health and amphibian species. As well as helping to get volunteer labor to build BDAs and help manage contractors. They are extremely supportive of this work and are helpful in gaining public support. And they have helped us coordinate working Marshall Wolf, Edd Hammill, and Andrew Potter with USU and the Swaner preserve to do BDAs in East Canyon and Kimball Creek. Patrick Nelson from Salt Lake City Utilities/Wateshed Management has been a collaborator and as landowners in the canyon and owner of water rights SLC is also very supportive of our efforts to do work in the canyon. Bob Thompson, the Salt Lake County Watershed Manager has been contacted as well about this project and is very supportive of it and will continue to be a partner in helping to monitor water quality and in developing the project moving forward. Sage Fitch, the Salt Lake County Bee and Noxious Weeds Program Manager has been involved in planning the weed control aspects of the project for garlic mustard and myrtle spurge. UDOT, SLC open lands, and the BLM have also been contacted about doing weed control on their lands and they are supportive. The community of Forest Home owns about 640 acres in Lambs Canyon. They are extremely supportive of our efforts and have written Bill Stocksdale has written a letter of support that is attached. Letters of support have been attached * Utah Division of Wildlife Resources- Robert Edgel * Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands - PJ Abraham * Summit County - Tom Fisher, County Manager and Glenn Wright, County Council Member * Summit County Fire Warden -- Bryce Boyer * Andy Pappus -Weber River Watershed Committee and Utah Department Agriculture * Wild Utah Project - Janice Gardner * Trout Unlimited -- Paul Burnett * Summit Park Home Owners Association * Pinebrook Masters Association and Home Owners Association * Utah State University Extension -- Darren McAvoy and Dusty Morgan * US Forest Service - Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
Future Management:
We will continue to monitor the success of this project to stop weed spread, insect infestations, and success of BDAs to reach objectives and will make any future repairs or adjustments as needed to ensure their success. The Forest Service will work with the UDWR to continue to build upon these improvements to benefit the habitat in this area. There may be further work to introduce boreal toads in future depending on results of surveys.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
This project will improve the forage availability by reducing the canopy cover and allowing more light to enter the forest floor also BDAs will increase forage and disperse water. This project will also prevent garlic mustard from spreading and reducing forage quality. This will largely be a grazing benefit for wildlife since most of the project is in a protected watershed where grazing is not allowed. But there are areas near Swaner where there is livestock and grazing and goats will be utilized to reduce fuels near Summit Park. This project will complete NEPA that will be helpful in allowing for timber harvest in the future or other biomass utilization for fire wood. Parley's canyon and the surrounding ski resorts are important area for recreation from skiing, hiking, fishing, camping, golfing, and hunting since it is so close to SLC. A large part of Utah's economy is driven by this recreation and protecting this watershed will help preserve those uses and sustain our economy. The extended archery hunt is extremely popular in this area and hundreds of hunters are able to have quality hunting experiences. Bonneville cutthroat are found in these waters and this project will help improve angler opportunity. Since the project is so close to SLC, HOgle Zoo has expressed interest in using this project to help educate the public and this will provide an increased opportunity for wildlife viewing.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$873,950.80 $332,500.00 $1,206,450.80 $26,756.00 $1,233,206.80
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies Wood posts to build BDAs in Lambs Canyon, Snyderville Basin, and Smith Creek. $5,000 provided by Kamas Valley Soil Protection District grant funds to assist Basin Recreation with purchase of BDA matterials, permits and plants plugs. $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Funds for contractors to build 300 BDAs $35,000. $5,000 provided by Kamas Valley Soil Protection District Grant funds to assist Synderville Basin Special Recreation District with BDA's and plantings in Toll Canyon and East Canyon Creek $30,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (seasonal employee) UDWR seasonal time to help with Boreal Toad/ Amphibian Monitoring, Bat monitoring, and building BDAs $1,120.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Four Rapid Stream-Riparian Assessment surveys for monitoring restoration activities. $4,274.40 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Backcountry Hunters and Anglers volunteers for restoration activities, including recruiting and management. $1,015.90 $0.00 $5,120.00 2021
Contractual Services Funds for 3 weeks of contractors, ACE or UCC crews in the fall of 2020 and 3 weeks in spring of 2021 to hand treat and spray with herbicide myrtle spurge and garlic mustard. As well as money for chemical. $44,400 $44,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Archaeological Clearance 7,398 acres of cultural surveys on USFS X $21/acre= . State or Federal survey implementation preferred. contract if needed. $155,358.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Mechanical treatment, possible heli lift, of trees 63 acres of extremely steep terrain near homes. $7,400 per acre = $466,200. $227,500 from the Basin Recreation. $22,500 Kamas Valley Soild Protection District for watershed protection grant $206,200.00 $250,000.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Forestry Fire and State Lands crews, UFA crews, USFS crews, contractors , or other crews to cut and chip trees to reduce fire risk to communities, protect firefighters, and infrastructure. 500 acres X $280/acre= $140,000 $140,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Ground crews to cut trees, pile and burn and/or connect logs to helicopter. $3,175/acre X 63 acres= $200,000. $50,000 has been contributed from the Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District of Summit County. So only need $150,000 from WRI. $150,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 2021
Archaeological Clearance Cultural clearance for pre- forest clearing work on private, UOL, and SLC lands. 1,469 acres X $21/acre = $30,849 $30,849.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Fuel reductin treatment by use of Goats on 40 acres of forested area in WUI interface. $1000 an acre x 40 acres = $40,000. $22,500 provided by Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District. $17,500.00 $22,500.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (seasonal employee) UDWR technician time to monitor bats and other WAP species prior to and after project implementation. $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Other Funds to pay for stream alteration permits for BDAs on Lambs Canyon Creek, Parleys' Creek, Little Dell Creek, Mount Aire Creek, Swaner Creek, and other creeks within the watershed as needed. $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Other Funds to have Kayleigh Mullen from Hogle Zoo organize and manage volunteers to build BDAs and conduct amphibian surveys $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Other Wild Utah Project - project implementation support. $0.00 $0.00 $6,400.00 2021
Contractual Services Four boreal toad and aquatic habitat assessments led by Wild Utah Project and volunteers $2,117.60 $0.00 $816.00 2021
NEPA Funds to help USFS complete botanical clearance and to speed up NEPA completion for cut and pile. Federal work. $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Contractual Services Hiring contractors to conduct weed mapping of Garlic Mustard, Myrtle Spurge, Yellow Starthistle, etc. in Parley's Canyon and Summit Park. $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Other Funds to help with outreach and educational efforts with community to gain support for restoration efforts through Save Our Canyons and the Cottonwood Canyons Foundation. $11,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Materials and Supplies Wood posts to build BDAs in Swaner Preserve. $2,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Other Utah State University / Swaner Preserve staff time to construct BDAs. $0.00 $0.00 $3,300.00 2021
Contractual Services Wild Utah Project volunteers for restoration activities, including recruiting and management. $1,015.90 $0.00 $5,120.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) UDWR full time employee time to contract and implement project 3 X 80 $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2021
Seed (GBRC) Seed for 10 acres at the mouth of Parley's Canyon to help compete with myrtle spurge and other weeds. $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Materials and Supplies Milkweed seedlings, willows, and other wetland plants to plant along BDAs. Milkweed is to benefit monarch butterflies. $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$234,300.00 $327,000.00 $561,300.00 $29,352.78 $590,652.78
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $125,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Kamas Valley Conservation District Kamas Valley Soil Protection District funding for watershed improvments, reduction of fuels using goats. $0.00 $22,000.00 $0.00 2021
Kamas Valley Conservation District Kamas Valley Soil Protection District grant to install bda and plant $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2021
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) S024 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) S025 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Safari Club International S026 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District Hand crews for forest treatment $0.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 2021
Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District for mechanical treatment of forest on steep slopes. May include use of helicopter $0.00 $250,000.00 $0.00 2021
MDF Expo Permit ($1.50) S053 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
USFS-WRI A128 $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Back Country Hunters and Anglers $0.00 $0.00 $5,120.00 2021
Wild Utah Project $0.00 $0.00 $12,336.00 2021
Utah State University (USU) $0.00 $0.00 $3,300.00 2021
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2021
Habitat Council Account QHCR $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
DNR Watershed U004 $9,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $1,724.62 2021
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $872.16 2022
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Cross Snaggletooth N2
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Ecology and Life History NA
Deseret Mountainsnail N2
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Cabin Communities / Development Low
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Ski Area Development Low
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mitered Vertigo N4
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Moose R3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Moose R3
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes High
Mountain Cottontail R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mountain Cottontail R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Marshsnail N3
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Olive-sided Flycatcher N4
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Olive-sided Flycatcher N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Peregrine Falcon N4
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Cabin Communities / Development Low
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Low
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Low
Dusky Grouse R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Dusky Grouse R2
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Dusky Grouse R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Medium
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Very High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Problematic Insects – Native High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/31/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Chris Crockett
Robbie, have you spoken with regional or SLO mollusk efforts regarding benefits to snail species? I agree fire prevention and watershed health related projects will theoretically benefit a lot of species but I'd prefer to see a discussion with those species expert to confirm they agree the species in question will receive direct benefit.
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Robert Edgel
Chris, I worked with Keith Lawrence our native aquatics manager to identify which species were located in the viscinity and how our stream restoration and forest health improvements will benefit these snail species. I will continue to work with him and coordinate monitoring etc. to see how we are doing and can also work with SLC specialists as needed.
Comment 02/04/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Lawrence
As yet we are not certain that either of the species we've included, Mitered vertigo or Cross snaggletooth, will be found in the project area. We did find the former in substantial numbers along the hiking trail in Lamb's Canyon this past summer, so I believe it is likely they are there. Regardless, we've proposed surveys to verify their presence. If they are there, I would expect installation of the BDAs to benefit these terrestrial snails which are typically found under leaf litter, bark and fallen trees in various states of decay. They have a preference for these habitats where there are moist soil conditions. The proposed BDAs should bolster these habitats and improve soil moisture conditions by raising the water table.
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Danny Summers
There is no mention of how and where seed will be applied? Will it be used in conjunction with fuel reduction projects?
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Robert Edgel
Danny I added some details in the methods section. We are just going to be hand braodcasting the seed in areas where we are spot spraying myrtle spurge to help fill the niche and not allow spurge to come back. Also, it will help improve habitat for wildlife and pollinators.
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Danny Summers
As forbs aren't the best competitors, would it be beneficial to include some perennial grasses to help compete with the weeds in the future? If it became necessary to spray again in the future the grasses would be able to persist another herbicide treatment. You also should check the herbicide labels for soil residual and avoid seeding during any period while the herbicide is still effective in the soil. Forbs can be especially sensitive to herbicides.
Comment 02/04/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Robert Edgel
That is a good idea. The areas we will be seeding are more rocky so I will work with you to improve the seed mix. Thanks for the comment.
Comment 03/25/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
I have heard rumors that the scope of this project has changed for this first year? This is in relation to the heli-logging. If that is the case will you please update your budget so I know how much you are asking for in FY21? Thanks.
Comment 03/26/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Robert Edgel
Alison, I am not sure where you have heard that because Jessica Kirby and I have not changed anything that I am aware of. I am working with Arie to try and reduce the amount of area needed for ground cultural surveys on USFS but everything else is the same. Let me know if you have heard something else. If we find cheaper ways to do the heli-lift area we will just do more acres.
Completion
Start Date:
07/15/2020
End Date:
06/30/2021
FY Implemented:
2021
Final Methods:
Forest Management We used FFSL, UFA, and other crews alongside contractors to cut and chip trees and brush around homes and infrastructure in Lamb Canyon and Mount Aire. This allowed for more defensible space and protection of roads so firefighters can safely access areas. We completed 7,000 acres of cultural clearances on USFS so the NEPA can be completed and allow us to cut pile and chip conifer throughout the forest beginning in phase 2. We completed the hand thinning of about 140 acres in Snyderville Basin Recreation lands above Summit Park. A national award was given to them for the work that was done. We will continue to do more work there in second phase. Weed Control In the spring of 2021 we hired a contractor to manually remove myrtle spurge at the mouth of Parley's Canyon on 50 acres of land. It was very effective and we will continue to monitor re-sprouts. We also hired a conservation crew to manually remove garlic mustard in Killyon Canyon on about 10 acres. Beaver Dam Analog Construction We constructed about 70 BDAs in Lambs Canyon, East Canyon Creek, and Toll Canyon Creek in the summer and fall of 2020.
Project Narrative:
This project will work to improve the overall health of the entire watershed in Parley's Canyon. To accomplish this there has been lots of coordination and planning between many landowners and interest groups to accomplish a landscape scale restoration project. There is a great need to build defensible space around homes, cabins, infrastructure, and roads. This will not only keep residents safe but also help keep firefighters safe who will be asked to risk their lives in defense of this property. This project will work to address and minimize these threats. This project also worked to improve the health of the forest by thinning conifers stands that are encroaching on struggling aspen stands. The aspen in this watershed are beginning to die off from disease and insect infestations. This is probably a result of competition with conifer and older trees that are more susceptible to disease.This project will help to reduce the competition of conifers and allow more water for struggling aspen. By increasing the aspen stands we will also create more diversity of habitat and provide more food for wildlife. From historic overgrazing and removal of beavers the streams and riparian systems have been damaged and critical pond habitats have been lost. This project will use beaver dam analogs (BDAs) to repair some of this damaged down-cut and incised stream channels, restore pond habitat, and increase riparian vegetation. This will benefit many wildlife and fish species. It will also increase water quantity and quality. The healthier and larger riparian areas will also act as a fire break to prevent the spread of catastrophic wildfire. The BDAs will also help catch sediment and slow water flows post fires to reduce downstream damage and flooding. The need to control and stop the spread of myrtle spurge and garlic mustard is important for the health of the ecosystem. We worked to identify priority areas and began removing these plants to reduce the risk of spread.
Future Management:
We will continue to monitor the success of this project to stop weed spread, insect infestations, and success of BDAs to reach objectives and will make any future repairs or adjustments as needed to ensure their success. The Forest Service will work with the UDWR to continue to build upon these improvements to benefit the habitat in this area. There may be further work to introduce boreal toads in future depending on results of surveys.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8721 Affected Area
8858 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
9107 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop-pile-burn
10601 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
10652 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
Project Map
Project Map