Markagunt Aspen Restoration Phase 1
Project ID: 5176
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: 2606
Project Manager: Richard Jaros
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Dixie National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Phase 1 of the Markagunt Aspen Restoration Project will involve improving aspen stands on the Markagunt Plateau by mechanically thinning conifer and creating coppice openings in approximately 364 acres of aspen habitat. Conifers will be piled in small clearings and burned one year later. Layout/marking/surveys will also be conducted in approximately 350 acres of mixed aspen/conifer stands in preparation for future aspen mechanical thinning in Phase 2.
Location:
This project is located on the Cedar City Ranger District of the Dixie National Forest. It is immediately North and South of Utah State Route 143 at the junction with Sidney Valley Rd. (FS30048) in the Mammoth Creek Watershed.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Aspen on the Markagunt Plateau continues to decline due largely to conifer encroachment that shades it out. Recent FIA data has indicated that aspen decline has accelerated in recent years and most recently was at a 3% per year rate for the entire Dixie National Forest. Additionally, later successional mixed conifer aspen stands are at risk from high severity/intensity wildfires that threaten wildlife habitat, water quality, and infrastructure. The Brian Head Fire (~72,000 acres) showed the capability for high severity, stand replacing events in mixed conifer stands on the Markagunt Plateau. On August 6, 2019 Congressman Stewart met with the Cedar City Ranger District, Dixie National Forest for a field visit to discuss forest management. Congressman Stewart expressed interest in the Cedar City Ranger District's strategic approach to mitigate future high intensity fire such as the Brian Head Fire, and offered to help us get more work done on the ground. Furthermore, Congressman Stewart offered to try and find additional monies, however, to date none has been allocated. One of the tour stops was the Sydney Valley area, also known as the Markagunt Aspen Restoration for this proposal, and the Congressman stated "can we all agree this needs to be treated?" Also in attendance were County Commissioners from Garfield, Iron, Kane and Washington counties; Utah State Forester and Southwest Area Manager Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands; Department of Natural Resources, -Division of Wildlife Resources; Intermountain Regional Office (RO) Deputy Regional Forester (DFR) and other Intermountain Regional Office staff. This proposal aims to help address some of the concerns brought forth in the meeting. This proposal is a multi-phased project that will implement approximately 2,920 acres of aspen improvement treatments and coppice openings in the Cedar City Ranger District, Dixie National Forest. Phase 1 of the project will consist of aspen improvements and coppice openings in a 364 acre treatment. Phase 2 and phase 3 includes 1,220 acres of treatments, which include a combination of mechanical removal of conifers, mechanical creation of coppice openings, and both broadcast and pile prescribed burning. Aspen restoration and forest health treatments at this scale on the Cedar City Ranger District will help improve and maintain population viability for a variety of wildlife species (elk, deer, raptors, neo-tropical migratory birds, small game, insects, etc.) and help to slow the rate of Aspen decline for the Dixie National Forest. Phase 1 of this project is immediately adjacent to Mammoth Creek. Upper Mammoth Creek is identified as a key Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki Utah; BCT) restoration project in the Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy for BCT (UDWR2018). Approximately 14-15 miles of tributaries to Mammoth Creek have already had nonnative trout removed and a conservation population of BCT restored. Mammoth Creek adjacent to the proposed project is slated for BCT restoration in the next 2-3 years. Late successional mixed conifer forests are prone to high severity fire, which has considerable negative impacts to BCT and their habitat as evidenced by numerous fires in the Southern Region in the past two decades. The purpose of this project is to reduce fire risk to the surrounding community, improving wildlife habitat by restoring aspen ecosystems on the Markagunt Plateau, and to protect water quality to Mammoth creek and its tributaries. The risk to the communities, wildlife habitat and water quality are largely due to encroaching conifer within aspen stands that is causing their decline while increasing the risk of high intensity wildfire and risk to insect and disease outbreaks. Restoring aspen communities on the Markagunt Plateau would result in multiple benefits, which include but are not limited to: 1. Improving and increasing the amount of habitat for wildlife species dependent upon aspen ecosystems (i.e., mule deer, elk, and Northern goshawk); 2. Improving and increasing the amount of habitat and forage for domestic and wild ungulates (i.e., elk, mule deer, cattle and sheep); 3. Improving native species diversity; 4. Reducing hazardous fuel accumulations; 5. Reducing the risk for large-scale, intense wildland fires. This results in lower risk to the safety of the public and firefighters as well as to the values at risk (i.e. private land with structures). This also results in lower risk to sensitive wildlife species [i.e. Northern goshawk, and Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah)]; and, 6. Increasing the probability that future naturally caused fires can be managed and allowed to play their natural role in the aspen ecosystems on the Markagunt Plateau.
Objectives:
Phase 1 will Improve aspen stands by removing competing conifer and standing dead trees as well as reducing fuel loadings below 15 tons per acre in order to initiate aspen regeneration on 364 acres with at least 1,000 stems per acre. Wildlife Benefit: The intent of this project is to create age class diversity in the aspen ecosystems on the Markagunt Plateau and create a more sustainable aspen landscape over time. Implementation of this project will increase habitat diversity with a mosaic of treated and un-treated acres. Habitat fragmentation should not be an issue for wildlife as care has been taken to have leave areas across the landscape to promote species diversity. Species (elk and deer) that favor early seral communities and early seral vegetation species will benefit from this project. This project will provide increases in habitat effectiveness and benefit ungulates species. The overall outcome will provide much needed plant species diversity across the landscape that will last well into the future. Small game and upland game will ultimately see an increased benefit over time as the project areas develop into a maturing aspen forest. Fire/Fuels Benefit: This project will reduce surface and ladder fuel accumulations in the treatment areas. Current surface fuel loadings range from 20 to 50+ tons per acre. Target fuel loadings are 15 tons per acre ore less. The project will also reduce the risk for large-scale, intense wildland fires. This will result in lower risk to the safety of the public and firefighters and to values at risk (i.e. private land with structures and State Route 143 access and egress). The project will also result in lower risk to sensitive wildlife species like the Northern goshawk, and Bonneville cutthroat trout. Furthermore, this project will increase the probability that future naturally caused fires can be managed and allowed to play their natural role in the aspen ecosystems on the Markagunt Plateau.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
This project needs to be completed now to minimize risk of high severity, high intensity wildfire and to begin to reverse the decline of aspen on the Markagunt Plateau. If left untreated a continued decline in aspen is expected at approximately the 3% per year rate as indicated as the current rate by volume for the Dixie National Forest using FIA data. Furthermore, stands will decline to a point where they will never be able to be regenerated back to aspen dominated stands because there will be so few stems left and the root systems may not be healthy enough to sprout back when a disturbance such as cutting or fire occurs. With a decline in aspen, wild ungulates will continue to be negatively impacted. As conifer continues to increase, and aspen decreases, the amount of usable forage for ungulates will decrease. As conifers continue to increase, the risk for large high intensity wildfires will also continue to increase as well as the risk to insect and disease outbreaks in different tree species. This results in forest health and public safety issues. Habitat for sensitive species such as the Northern goshawk are currently at risk from high severity/intensity-wildfire. Implementation of this project reduces the risk of wildfires impacting these sensitive species. The greatest threat/risk to the aspen ecosystems post treatment is the browse pressure from both wild and domestic ungulates. To aid attainment of at least 1,000 to 2,000 aspen saplings per acre and 400 to 600 aspen recruits per acre in areas where mechanical and/or prescribed fire treatments are to occur, browse thresholds and adaptive management response options have been developed and will be implemented. This includes use of prescribed fire in coppice openings to stimulate aspen sprouting and installation of slash arbor (i.e. slash) fencing around coppice openings to protect regeneration.
Relation To Management Plan:
This project is directly tied to the Dixie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan as amended (Forest Plan) (USDA, 1986). The Forest Plan guides all natural resource management activities and provides the overall guidance for management activities by specifying goals and objectives, desired future conditions, management direction, and standards and guidelines. Other management plans that relate to the Upper Mammoth Creek Farm Bill include: 1) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule deer (2014-2019) section IV Statewide management goals and objectives. This plan will address Strategy C, which reads as follows: "Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush and ranges being diminished by encroachment of unwanted conifers into sagebrush, aspen habitats, and ponderosa pine stands". 2) Panguitch Lake Deer Herd Unit Management Plan, Deer Herd Unit # 28 -Habitat management strategies (2015-2022): The project will help to restore essential forage opportunities for wildlife by reducing the amount of encroaching sub alpine fir. In addition, the project will reduce fuel loading that can greatly alter potential wildfire behavior, further protecting this crucial summer range from high intensity, high severity wildfire. 3) North American Mule Deer Conservation Plan (Mule Deer Working Group 2004): A) Mule deer habitat objectives and strategies-develop and implement habitat treatment protocols that reduce the impacts of cheatgrass or other invasive plants. B) Manage mule deer habitat in a fashion to control type conversions (i. e. conversion of rangeland to croplands, and shrublands to monotypic pinyon-juniper stands) (Pg. 7). The project will help in preventing monotypic sub alpine fir stands by reducing the conifer encroachment. 4) Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan (2015-2022): Elk are generalist ungulates and forage on grasses, forbs and shrubs. They prefer to spend a lot of the summer months within or near aspen conifer forests. Conifer encroachment causing decline in aspen stands is a concern in all of Utah. Habitat Management Goal B: conserve and improve elk habitat throughout the State. C. Watershed Restoration Initiative b) Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional WRI working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats that need enhancement or restoration I) Identify habitat projects on summer ranges (aspen communities) to improve calving habitat. II) Encourage land managers to manage portions of forests in early succession stages using controlled burning and logging. This project will directly improve summer elk habitat through thinning and burning, creating mixed seral stages and creating small openings for perennial grasses and forbs to improve. 5) Elk Management Plans for Panguitch Lake Unit #28: Unit Habitat Objectives; Maintain and/or enhance forage production through direct range improvements throughout the unit to achieve population management objectives (Panguitch Lake Unit). Discourage the encroachment of conifer in aspen stands. This project will help accomplish these objectives by improving the understory of grasses and forbs and eliminating conifer trees in aspen stands. 6) National Fire Plan (NFP) - Primary Goals: 1) improve fire prevention and suppression as well as 2) restore fire adapted ecosystem. The project will reduce the amount fuel loading within the mixed conifer and aspen vegetation types that can alter fire behavior and improve these primary goals. 7) Accompanying NFP 10 year Comprehensive Strategy - Guiding Principles: 3) prevent invasive species and restore watershed function and biological communities through short-term stabilization and long-term rehabilitation; 4) restore healthy, diverse, and resilient ecological system to minimize uncharacteristically severe fires on a priority watershed basis through long-term restoration. This project is one of several current or proposed projects on the Cedar City Ranger District were project objectives are aimed at restoring watershed function and biological communities. The major goal is to move towards a resilient ecological system by reducing ladder and surface fuel loading and creating species diversity. 8) State of Utah-Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy-Protecting the health and welfare of Utahns and our lands. Priority Action Areas- Southwest Region 6, Iron County, the project is near the Brian Head community area on National Forest Lands (pg. 19). 9) Land and Resource Management Plan-Dixie National Forest (LRMP 1986): A) Management Area 1 and 2B-Provide adequate forage to sustain big game population levels agree to in approved wildlife management plans on National Forest System (NFS) lands. Improve habitat capability through direct treatments of vegetation and, where possible, conduct habitat improvement projects cooperatively with the UDWR. This project will help maintain and/or increase the quality foraging habitat for big game by removing encroaching conifers and thinning of the overall aspen stands. 10) Utah Support Area Fire Management Plan (2005): protection of critical deer habitat and watershed protection (pg.196). This project will improve and protect critical summer range for mule deer and elk as well as help maintain watershed conditions by reducing fuel loading and sub alpine fir encroachment. 11) Warren-Bunker-Castle Valley Allotment Management Plan - Desired Conditions in the Upland: Improve plant diversity and revert areas that have conifer encroachment issues. This project will aid in reverting areas of conifer encroachment that may improve plant diversity. 12) Bonneville cutthroat trout Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy (UDWR 2018): The BCT CAS identifies large wildfires as a factor that is a threat to the persistence of BCT. As outlined in the Project Need, Water Quality and Quantity and Threats and Risks sections of the proposal the treatments within this proposal will support the following objectives and actions from the BCT CAS: Goal 2: Protect all critical BCT populations (in this case critical = one of the Southern GMU metapopulations). Goal 3, Objective 1: Work with landowners to maintain/improve land management activities. Goal 8, Objective 1: Encourage and enable partners to perform restoration that benefits the BCT fisheries. Additionally, this project supports Southern GMU goals 1 and 2: GMU Goal 1: Maintain all populations within GMU GMU Goal 2: Complete restoration of Mammoth Creek by end of 2022 13) Upper Sevier Watershed Management Plan (2004): Aspen/Mixed Conifer -- Vegetation Composition and Communities at risk of Wildfire were listed as the number 1 and 2 key issues identified. Spruce-Fir fuel conditions were identified as key issue number 9. Loss of healthy aspens stands to mixed conifer was considered undesirable and refreshing aspen stands as is proposed in this project would be beneficial to the management plan. Reduction of fuels that could contribute to severe fires that threaten communities would also enhance the tie to the Upper Sevier watershed management plan.
Fire / Fuels:
The Markagunt Aspen Restoration Project treatments would be implemented to effectively restore resilient, fire-adapted aspen ecosystems on a landscape-scale by moving the stands toward desired condition in terms of composition (species diversity) and density (crown spacing, ladder, and surface fuel loadings). In addition the treatments will improve structural diversity, promote aspen regeneration and recruitment, reduce the current hazardous fuel loadings ranging from 20 to 50+ tons per acre, and reduce the continuity of fuels across the Markagunt Plateau; thus mitigating the risks and damage associated with high intensity, high severity wildfires and, where appropriate, expand opportunities to manage fire for resource benefits and meet Forest Plan objectives. Currently the area is in a Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) of 2 (moderate departure from historic conditions) with the goal of converting the project areas to FRCC 1 (within historic conditions). This project will reduce the overall risk for high intensity and high severity wildfires in the area. Values at risk and resource concerns: Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) involving Private Property with structures: subdivisions include Ireland Meadows, Castle Valley, Rainbow Meadows, Meadow Lake where there are approximately 238 structures, 5.2 miles of power lines, 11.3 miles of State routes, two Drinking Water Source Protection Zones, one SNOTEL site, and 21 historic properties. Priority wildlife habitat: Goshawks within and adjacent to project areas identified high crown fire potentials due to crown connectivity. In addition, there are 16 miles of fire sensitive streams in the area. This includes streams slated for future BCT restoration as part of the Upper Mammoth Creek project. If untreated- continued decline in aspen. If untreated- uncharacteristic high intensity/severity wildfire effects.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Project treatments will considerably lessen the risk of large-scale high intensity and high severity wildfires that could result in long-term watershed degradation. By maintaining watershed function, long-term water quality will be maintained or enhanced. The 2004 Upper Sevier Watershed Management Plan listed Aspen/Mixed Conifer - vegetation composition and communities at risk of wildfire as the number 1 and 2 key issues identified. Spruce-Fir fuel conditions were identified as key issue number 9. Loss of healthy aspen stands to mixed conifer was considered undesirable and refreshing aspen stands as is proposed in this project would be beneficial to the management plan. Reduction of fuels that could contribute to severe fires that threaten communities would also enhance the tie to the Upper Sevier watershed management plan. The results of research on the volume and longevity of water yield increase following conifer removal from aspen communities, such as the proposed in this project, has been variable with some studies showing fairly substantial, relative long-term increases (Gottfried 1991) and others show little increase, or only short-term increases (Troendle et al. 2010). Perhaps the most compelling local study shows that aspen stands had 34-44% higher snow water equivalents than adjacent conifer stands and a 42-83% greater potential water yield for runoff and groundwater recharge (LaMalfa and Ryle, 2008), indicating that removal of conifer and maintaining and improving aspen stands should result in higher water yield. By removing conifer, it is anticipated that water quantity will be enhanced (seeps, springs, bogs--improved). While no TMDL is applied to the reach of streams within this project area, lowering of the risk of severe wildfire and the impacts that are created by fire even moderately severe fires will protect downstream reaches of Mammoth creek which has a TMDL applied for total Phosphorus. Also this will protect the Upper Sevier which also has a TMDL for total Phosphorus and Habitat Alteration.
Compliance:
Cultural surveys will be conducted with funding from this proposal and a report will be submitted to SHPO. Concurrence was received from USFWS that this project can be implemented. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): All NEPA has been completed for this project. The NEPA decision has been loaded in the Documents portion of this proposal.
Methods:
Objectives will be met by using mechanical and/or hand thinning treatments on approximately 364 acres to remove conifers and dead trees from seral aspen stands, piling these materials in openings, as well as creating coppice openings on about 36 acres. Pile burning of residual slash from the treatments and within coppice units will occur post thinning treatments. These prescribed fire treatments will be accomplished by force account. The mechanical thinning, hand thinning, piling and prescribed fire preparation will be completed approximately between the fall of 2022 and the summer of 2023. The prescribed fire will then be applied after the piles are removed by a commercial contract or if the sale of the piles goes no bid. During the summer/fall of 2022 a seasonal Forest Service Timber Crew will complete the layout, marking, and surveys of aspen, mixed conifer and spruce fir stands on approximately 350 acres in preparation for phase 2 of the project to be implemented starting in 2023.
Monitoring:
Fixed radius regeneration plots will be measured the fall after initial treatments and after snow melt annually after to ensure that regeneration is occurring, and height growth is being achieved. The initial goal of at least 1,000 to 2,000 aspen saplings per acre will guide whether prescribed burning treatments and arbor (slash) fencing installation will be necessary. The final recruitment goal will be at least 500 trees per acre over 10 feet tall. A long-term vegetation monitoring plot and transect also occur within the treatment area and will continue to be monitored throughout the treatments and after to determine if aspen regeneration is sufficient. In order to develop the prescribed burn plan photo fuels plots will be used to estimate the fuel loading and be used in modeling that will develop the burn plan. Once successful regeneration is achieved, a report can be submitted for the final project summary. UDWR and the Forest Service have established several fish monitoring stations both upstream and downstream of the project area. Stations are monitored every 5-7 years. Once BCT restoration is complete, these results will be available in UDWR publications on BCT status (see attachments), which can be uploaded to the database. Wildlife monitoring - The Utah Division of Wildlife (UDWR) regularly conducts mule deer and elk population estimates within the Panguitch Lake Unit 28 area. In addition, post treatment wildlife monitoring will take place annually for Focal Species during goshawk territory monitoring efforts.
Partners:
On November 24, 2015, Forest Fire Management Officer Kevin Greenhalgh participated in the Southwest Area Catastrophic Wildfire working group meeting. The group proposes action plans to reduce catastrophic wildfires in Utah. Members of the group include the State of Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands, Kane County Commissioner, Iron County Commissioner, Garfield County Commissioner, Beaver County Commissioner, Bureau of Land Management, State Senator, Director of the Five County Association of Governments, Hurricane City Fire Chief, Iron County Extension Agent, and the Director of Utah Association of Conservation Districts. This group identifies communities at risk and actions to mitigate the risks as part of implementing the National cohesive strategy. The community of Upper Mammoth was identified by the state as a high priority. On July 11-12, 2016 the Cedar City Ranger District hosted a Collaborative Open House for the public to learn about the proposal for the Upper Mammoth Creek Project and provide the Forest with feedback and recommendations. Collaboration participants included homeowners from private in-holdings such as Ireland and Rainbow Meadows, Iron County Natural Resource Management, Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, Resource Specialists from the Color Country Bureau of Land Management and a Biologist from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Feedback was positive and recommendations included expanding the project area, performing fuels reduction work on private lands and allowing some of the areas to be made available for fuelwood collection during project implementation. As highlighted in the Project Need Section, Congressman Stewart, County Commissioners from Garfield, Iron, Kane and Washington counties; Utah State Forester and Southwest Area Manager Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands; Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources; Intermountain Regional Office (RO) Deputy Regional Forester (DFR) and other Intermountain Regional Office staff visited the area and identified the need for treatment. This proposal aims to help address some of the concerns brought forth in the meeting as well as benefit wildlife through improving aspen stands on the Markagunt Plateau. In February and March of 2019, the Cedar City Ranger District staff met with Kane County Commissioners and Resource advisory board, Iron County commissioners, Utah Forestry and Fire and the Public Land Policy Coordination Office State of Utah to discuss the project and seek input on treatments and locations of treatments. In April 2019 the Cedar City Ranger District met with the Catastrophic Fire Committee as well as the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and NRCS to discuss the project. All groups were in support of the project and only commented that more acres should be treated.
Future Management:
Phase 1 of the Markagunt Aspen Restoration Project includes aspen improvement units from the Upper Mammoth Creek and Assay Creek Farm Bill decisions signed in 2016 and 2019 respectively. Once the mechanical or hand treatments are implemented, piles not sold to commercial buyers will be burned to reduce fuel loading or stimulate aspen sprouting in coppice openings. Range permittees will be contacted for the range allotment in the area of treatments. Sheep herders will keep sheep out of the coppice openings until aspen is successfully regenerated. Aspen sprouting will be monitored until regeneration is fully successful. If necessary to protect aspen regeneration, slash arbor fencing will be installed around the coppice openings. A project summary report will be submitted once treatments are complete and can be updated when regeneration is successful. Future aspen improvement will occur in phase 2 that will include 350 acres of treatments that will include mechanical and hand treatments as well as prescribed burning. These treatments, along with successful regeneration of aspen in the Brian Head Fire area will eventually begin to reverse the trend of aspen decline on the Markagunt Plateau. These treatments will also help to manage high severity wildfire within aspen and mixed conifer on the Markagunt Plateau and aid in better management of high intensity and high severity wildfire.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Aspen stands are among the most diverse in both fauna and flora on the Forest. The value of the aspen stands in this project will improve as a forage resource for livestock and as forage and cover for wildlife. Through hand and mechanical thinning and prescribed fire treatments, conifer encroachment is addressed, and aspen regeneration/recruitment is promoted. With the removal of conifer, the amount of usable grasses and forbs in the aspen understory is expected to increase significantly. Many areas that are currently unproductive due to overgrowth will become desirable for future uses by both wild and domestic ungulates. While these treatments will create additional forage for both domestic and wild ungulates, short term browse pressure from both domestic livestock and wild ungulates is a concern with the implementation of this project. However, past coppice treatments adjacent to this project have been successful. These included mechanical removal of aspen and prescribed burning but did not require resting of domestic ungulate browsing. The aspen regeneration in this project is expected to also be successful. To help aid in the success, range permitees that graze sheep in the allotment that the treatments are in will be contacted to have the herders keep the sheep out of the coppice openings until the aspen has fully regenerated. Aspen sprouting will be monitored and if necessary, to protect the aspen regeneration in the coppice openings, a temporary slash arbor fence may be installed by the Forest Service after the initial mechanical removal of the trees. These treatments are expected to yield commercial timber to be used possibly as firewood or other non-sawtimber products. A similar project is currently occurring to the south where the buyer is utilizing all wood from aspen clear-cut treatments. It is expected that the cost of doing the work will exceed the value of the timber and thus the treatments will require WRI funding for implementation. However, it is expected that at least some of the material greater than 6" diameter will be utilized by a purchaser. If a commercial buyer does not purchase the decks they will be burned to help stimulate aspen regeneration. Mammoth Creek is a popular recreation fishery and improved aesthetics and fish population maintenance from this project will enhance recreation fishing. A 2017 report by the Outdoor Industry Association showed that nationally, outdoor recreation generates $887 billion in consumer spending annually, supports 7.6 million jobs and generates $59.2 billion in state and local tax revenue. The USFWS's 2011 national survey of fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation estimated that more than $1,000,000 was spent on hunting and fishing in Utah alone in 2011.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$610,960.00 $0.00 $610,960.00 $290,000.00 $900,960.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
NEPA Completion of Upper Mammoth Creek and Assay Creek Farm Bill CEs. Dollars are from 2 NEPA analyses. $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 2017
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Layout and marking of treatment units for phase 1. $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 1 burn prep and implementation for 34 acres of burning in coppice openings and burning of piles in all treatment units. $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Timber crew oversight and service contract development/administration for phase 1 $0.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Scaling of phase 1 decks and development of timber contract/ bidding/ administration to sell decks as firewood to a commercial buyer. $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 2023
Contractual Services Service contract to cut and deck material in all phase 1 units as well as pile dead material. $582,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Archaeological Clearance Resource surveys and clearance for phase 1 and phase 2 treatment units $28,560.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$610,960.00 $0.00 $610,960.00 $290,194.55 $901,154.55
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) Funding to complete NEPA analyses and decisions for Upper Mammoth Creek and Assay Creek Farm Bills $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 2017
United States Forest Service (USFS) Layout and marking for project as well as project oversight and administration in FY2023 $0.00 $0.00 $90,000.00 2023
United States Forest Service (USFS) Prescribed burn implementation and timber contract scaling/development/administration to sell decks. $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2023
DNR Watershed U004 $21,494.10 $0.00 $0.00 2023
DNR Watershed U004 $574,208.80 $0.00 $0.00 2024
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $194.55 2024
DNR Watershed U004 $15,257.10 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Black Bear
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Lewis's Woodpecker N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Western bumble bee N3
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Project Comments
Comment 01/17/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Jonathan Paklaian
Jason, great proposal. You state that sheep herders will keep sheep out of the coppice openings until aspen is successfully regenerated. Will this be monitored on a regular basis (if so, how often), then arbor fencing constructed as needed?
Comment 01/21/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Jason Villwock
Last year the sheep were in that allotment for 11 days. Each year they are in there for about 2 weeks. The allotments are checked on atleast weekly when livestock are present and if we have issues we can increase that. The arbor fencing would be only done if it seems like keeping the sheep out of the coppice openings isn't relieving enough browse pressure.
Comment 02/05/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
No anticipated bird (game, nongame, whatever) benefits whatsoever? Strikes me odd. Inconceivable, perhaps. Thanks for bringing this proposal, and best luck to you!
Comment 02/06/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Aspen-conifer vegetation type definitely has multiple benefits to many wildlife species as outlined in the Wildlife Action Plan. Maintaining and improving the aspen stands in this project area would benefit many cavity nesting birds such as; Williamson's sapsucker, three-toad woodpeckers, northern flickers, flammulated and western screech owls, kestrel's, chickadees, nuthatches, brown creepers, wren's and bluebirds. In addition, the aspen vegetation type in this area would be considered high value nesting and foraging habitat for the northern goshawk, a Forest sensitive species. Quaking aspen is one of the more important forest types supporting goshawks in Utah both as a seral species and a long-term persistent (Graham et. al 1999). Game birds such as mourning doves, wild turkey and grouse use aspen for nesting and foraging purposes. Mammals that use aspen stands include; deer, elk, black bears (feed on aspen buds, leaves and catkins), porcupines and beavers.
Comment 01/18/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
A few of those birds are Wildlife Action Plan SGCNs and are thus available on the drop-down menu. Any reason not to claim them? Thanks for the proposal, the area sure needs this work. Good luck!
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
We added those that applied in this go round.
Comment 02/09/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Richard, BCT restoration began in 2020 on Mammoth Creek. One nonnative trout removal has been completed. We anticipate completing the second treatment in summer 2021and restocking the mainstem Mammoth Creek with BCT in autumn 2021. Mike
Comment 02/11/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
Great Project !! I find it very valuable having a herder with the livestock. They understand the importance and are very effective in keeping the livestock where they need to be. I like to see the great coordination with the producer and being able to go forward with projects such as this one. A good herder and a few keen dogs its very valuable. Keep up the good work. !
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Thanks Jacob.
Comment 02/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
On the documents section looks like you have great support from the Soil Conservation District.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Thanks Jacob. We do have good support. Should be a great project.
Comment 01/18/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Dear Richard, Nonnative trout removal was completed in Mammoth Creek adjacent to this project and BCT have been reintroduced. M&M's also have a hard candy shell...I am surprised you didn't know that. Any monitoring for species listed as benefitting other than big game and BCT?
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Mike, not sure what you mean by this comment. Can you clarify?
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Just that you can say BCT have been restored to Mammoth Creek and are therefore now direct beneficiaries for the project. And just busting on Rich for rolling it over and not updating that, because it is fun to bust on Rich. Also you claim other species besides deer and BCT benefitting, do you have any plans to monitor them?
Comment 01/21/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Mike, as you mention, BCT have been restored to Mammoth Creek and the project will have benefits to these fish. Monitoring of these fish will be conducted by the UDWR and USFS fish biologists (that's you). Additional monitoring of deer and elk will be conducted on a hunt unit basis by the UDWR. BTW M&Ms have a soft center that melts in your mouth.
Comment 01/18/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Also any use of Utah Migration Initiative data in development of this project? See new ENHANCED PROJECT LOCATION/DESIGN BONUS POINTS on the FY 2023 score sheet.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
We did not initially use the migration initiative data, but have since looked at that data and find that our project does fall within elk and deer summer range. It also shows this area as a migration corridor for deer and that the elk also use this for movement in the area.
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
LOVE you are thinking about pollinators. You have western bumble bee as an species benefitting. It may help you to expound and give some info as to why this species may benefit. Great project. I can't believe a congressman promised you money then didn't deliver (eyes rolling).
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Clint, thanks for the comment. The bumblebee, and other pollinators will benefit from the project because it is designed to open the forest canopy, in part to allow additional flowering plants room to grow. The plan will include the creation of small clearings that should be excellent pollinator habitat.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Looks like a great project. Appreciate the use of prescribed fire and intensive sheep herding. Questions: 1. Are sheep the only livestock grazing this area? 2. Also, you mention Northern Goshawk in the Project Details but they're not listed on the species page. In the comments from 2020 you mention a number of other birds that are also not listed. Any other non-charismatic species that will benefit -- turtles, lizards, monarch butterflies...? 3. Mike asked this question but it wasn't answered -- what monitoring will occur for species other than big game and BCT? i.e., monitoring for bees, other birds, monarch butterflies.... 4. You mention that sheep herders will keep sheep out of the coppice openings until aspen is successfully regenerated. What about herding and other grazing management after the aspen has regenerated so that the aspen stands don't deteriorate again?
Comment 03/10/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Judi, thanks for the review and comment. 1) This project actually covers portions of two allotments. The north end is a sheep allotment, while the southern two polygons are cattle allotments. 2) While the area is northern goshawk habitat, there are no known nests in the area. The project will provide small openings in aspen and aspen conifer habitat which will benefit foraging goshawks. In general, we expect that opening the canopy of these stands will benefit a number of species that rely on aspen ecosystems. 3) We conduct annual monitoring for Northern Goshawk, Northern Flicker, and flammulated owl. No other monitoring is scheduled for this area. Pollinator monitoring is just getting a foothold in the area and we are working with SUU on some specific sites. 4) The sheep permittee in this area has ample forage to graze and has been very cooperative when we ask them to avoid new treatments. Even in the last couple of drought years we have not seen resource damage we might expect. We do not anticipate a deterioration resulting from sheep grazing this area. The cattle allotment is also managed by responsible permittees. However, the cattle are not herded as regularly as the sheep and there is greater potential for resource damage. We will adaptively manage that area of the project to determine whether more aggressive protection is needed for regeneration. In response to yours and other requests for more protection we are asking for money for fencing on the cattle allotment. Details will need to be worked out, but it will likely cost approximately $56K. We will work with the permittee to get this done.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
One more question: What cultural surveys and tribal consultation are being/have been conducted for this project?
Comment 02/08/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Charles Chamberlain
Judi, both NEPA documents have design features that require Cultural Resource Clearance for specific ground disturbing actions. For example, the Mammoth Creek NEPA document requires clearance for re-opening any closed roads, new fences, location of burn piles and landings, and any other ground disturbing activities. We would conduct a Class III cultural resources inventory prior to any ground disturbing activities. We are requesting $28k in this proposal to fund the surveys. Tribal consultation would be conducted as per usual with the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, the Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians, the Moapa Band of Paiutes and the Hopi Tribe.
Completion
Start Date:
06/29/2023
End Date:
11/28/2023
FY Implemented:
2024
Final Methods:
Hand Crews - Lop and Scatter (187.11 ac) and Lop and Pile (101.43 ac) conifer trees less than 5 inches dbh. Mechanical Crew - Cut and pile (283.34 ac) conifer from 5 to 18 inches dbh using shears and hot saws.
Project Narrative:
Phase 1 of the Markagunt Aspen Restoration Project was designed to regenerate about 350 acres of aspen forest on the Markagunt Plateau by mechanically removing and piling conifer 5 to 18 inches dbh and lopping and scattering or lopping and piling conifer less than 5 inches dbh using hand crews. Hand crews ended up treating a total of 288.54 acres while the mechanical crew cut and piled just over 283 acres.
Future Management:
Because of funding shortages additional funding will be needed to finish the project. Future needs to complete the project will include pile and broadcast burning to remove fuels and stimulate aspen suckering. Fire lines will need to be constructed in some areas to reduce the risk of fire spreading to heavy fuel loads.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
11447 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop-pile-burn
Project Map
Project Map