Buckhorn Flat/Swayback Knoll - Chaining (Phase 1)
Project ID: 5210
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2022
Submitted By: 105
Project Manager: Dan Fletcher
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
The Buckhorn Flat and Sway Backknoll areas have been identified as a potential Utah Prairie Dog (UPD) translocation area by the UPDOG and UPDRIT working groups. In addition, these areas are within important mule deer habitat; specifically, Swayback Knoll (mule deer winter range). Phase 1 of the project will encompass approximately 900 acres (300 acres - Swayback Knoll and 600 acres (Buckhorn Flat) of chaining/seeding.
Location:
The Buckhorn Flat portion of the project is located within the Fremont Allotment west of I-15 and the Swayback Knoll portion of the project is located in the Bone Hollow Allotment east of I-15. The legal description of the project is follows: Buckhorn Flat - T. 31 S, R. 8 W, Sec. Numerous Swayback Knoll - T. 32 S, R. 7 W, Sec. Numerous
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Buckhorn Flat and Swayback Knoll areas are important to mule deer; specifically, mule deer crucial winter range. In addition, these areas are expected to provide for Utah Prairie Dog (UPD) habitat. Although the projects are not located in Sage Grouse PHMAs that are designated by the BLM they are located within Bald Hills and Panguitch SGMA's. Sage grouse are in close proximity to the project area. The project will provide for creation of additional habitat and connectivity within the Bald Hills area. Currently, the areas are dominated by invasive species including Tansy mustard. To make these areas more suitable to wildlife they will be chained and aerial seeded. Phase 1 of the project will encompass approximately 900 acres (300 acres - Swayback Knoll and 600 acres -Buckhorn Flat) of chaining/seeding. Note: Phase 1 of the project would encompass 600 acres of the total project area identified on the map within the Buckhorn Flat area. Phase 2 of the project would complete the rest of the polygon within the Buckhorn Flat project area and complete more acreage within the Swayback Knoll area. The Nature Conservancy and BLM completed a UPD Habitat Suitability Model based on slope, elevation, depth to restrictive layer, soil texture and vegetation structure. Through this effort it has been determined that the project area is suitable for UPDs (Refer to Attached documents (suitability map and PowerPoint).
Objectives:
As discussed, approximately 900 acres would be treated and managed primarily for improvements to mule deer habitat while also providing for potential Utah Prairie dog habitat. The treatment is expected to facilitate UPD connectivity between colonies allowing for increased colonization, increased genetic exchange and buffering against potential sylvatic plague epizootic events. The objectives for this proposal for Utah Prairie Dogs are as follows: 1. Improve health, composition and diversity of grasses and forbs. 2. Maintain adequate habitat components to meet needs of UPDs in coordination with UDWR, USFWS, UPDOG and UPDRIT. 3. Provide opportunities for UPDs to ensure connectivity of populations through corridors and opportunity for expansion and dispersal. The objectives for mule deer are as follows: 1. Improve health, composition and diversity of shrubs, grasses and forbs. 2. Convert the existing vegetative community from annual forbs to a perennial grass, forb and shrub dominated community. 3. Increased vigor of shrubs as indicated by plants with leader and seed production.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
As discussed, the project area is dominated by annual forbs (Tansy mustard). An aggressive seed mix will be identified to ensure recovery of the site. The biggest risk is that the project fails and the current vegetation continues to exist. However, there is a large risk to wildlife species; specifically, mule deer if the project is not completed. Suitable mule deer winter range habitat has been identified by BLM, DWR, etc... as a limiting factor within these areas for many years. If this project is successful there are approximately 3,500 acres that could be rehabilitated within the area in subsequent phases.
Relation To Management Plan:
The Buckhorn Flat project area was authorized under the Chipman Peak Vegetation Enhancement Project (DOI-BLM-UT-C010-2015-0026-EA) and the Swayback Knoll project area was authorized under Fremont Habitat Improvement Project (DOI-BLM-UT-C010-2016-0054). The project is located within the Bald Hills SGMA and immediately adjacent to the Bald Hills PHMA. The project is consistent with the BLM Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan 2015. A. The project is consistent with the SGARMP (2015) goals, objectives and Management Actions that were identified in the Special Status Species section as follows: Special Status Species Goal: Maintain and/or increase GRSG abundance and distribution by conserving, enhancing or restoring the sagebrush ecosystem upon which populations depend in collaboration with other conservation partners. Refer to the following Objectives and Management Actions in the SGRMPA (Objectives: SSS-3, SSS-4, SSS-5) and Management Actions (MA-SSS-4, MA-SSS-6, MA-SSS7). B. The project is also consistent with the SGARMP (2015) objectives and Management Actions that were identified in the Vegetation section as follows: Refer to the following Objectives and Management Actions in the SGRMPA (MA-VEG-1, MA-VEG-2, MA-VEG-4, MA-VEG-5, MA-VEG-6, MA-VEG-8, MA-VEG-9, MA-VEG-10, MA-VEG-12 and MA-VEG-14). C. The project is also consistent with the SGARMP (2015) Management Actions that were identified in the Fire and Fuels Management section as follows: Refer to the following Management Actions in the SGRMPA (MA-FIRE-1 and MA-FIRE-3) D. The project is also consistent with the SGARMP (2015) Management Actions that were identified in the Livestock Grazing/Range Management section as follows: Refer to the following Management Actions in the SGRMPA (MA-LG-3, MA-LG-4, MA-LG-5, MA-LG-12, MA-LG-13, MA-LG-16 and MA-LG-17). Utah Prairie Dog Revised Recovery Plan 2012 The project is located within one UPD Management Unit Plan (U20-I15). The project would provide for UPD specific vegetation treatments that would provide for habitat improvements, which would allow for movement and genetic exchange between colonies. In addition, the treatments would provide for future translocation areas for UPDs, which is expected to allow for the recovery of UPDs on public lands. Cedar Beaver Garfield Antimony Resource Management Plan Resource Management Plan (1986). Although the Project Area was not specifically discussed in the RMP vegetation treatments were identified throughout the Field Office. The project will be consistent with the habitat management strategies identified in the Deer Herd Unit Management Plan for Deer Herd Unit #22 (Beaver) (UDWR) which pertain to the Project Area are as follows: 1. Maintain or enhance forage production through direct range improvements on winter and summer deer range throughout the unit to achieve population management objectives. 2. Maintain critical fawning habitat in good condition. Fawn recruitment is a major concern on this unit and may be the single greatest factor limiting the population. 3. Work with federal and state partners in fire rehabilitation and prevention on crucial deer habitat through the WRI process. Panguitch Herd Unit Management Plan (2015) The project will be consistent with the habitat management strategies identified in the Deer Herd Unit Management Plan for Deer Herd Unit #28 (Panguitch) (UDWR) which pertain to the Project Area are as follows: 1. Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the unit by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. 2. Seek cooperative projects to improve the quality and quantity of deer habitat. 3. Provide improved habitat security and escapement opportunities for deer. Pronghorn Statewide Management Plan (2009) Habitat Management Objective (B.e.), Under the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, design, implement, and monitor the effectiveness of habitat improvement projects to benefit pronghorn.
Fire / Fuels:
The area is dominated by annual invasive species including Tansy mustard. The project is expected to improve Fire/Fuels conditions as follows: 1. Treatments around the areas that are dominated by sagebrush would reduce the risk of fire entering these sensitive areas. 2. Reduce the threat of fires burning large amounts of this vegetation type at one time. 3. Return these areas to a fire regime closer to the historical range and desired future condition. 4. Improve landscape resiliency so that if a future fire did occur in the area, it would be more likely to recover on its own and would not burn at such a high intensity. 5. Fire return intervals would be more in balance with historic ranges. 6. Seeding desired grasses and forbs would also create fuel breaks which could help to slow or stop the spread of future wildfires.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The projects are both located at 5,600 feet, it is expected that in the long-term the likelihood for a healthy vegetation community is high. The project is expected to improve herbaceous understory, which will reduce water runoff and decrease soil erosion while increasing infiltration. Although no perennial streams or waterbodies will be impacted by this project, localized benefits may be experienced by increasing water availability to desirable vegetation.
Compliance:
A Class 3 cultural clearance would be required prior to project implementation. Vegetative monitoring data has been collected to provide baseline information to monitor the long-term success of the treatment and the grazing management system. The treatment will be rested from livestock grazing for a minimum of two years following treatment. The Swayback Knoll project area already has a fence around it and the Buckhorn Flat Pasture has not been utilized for many years. Therefore, resting the areas from livestock grazing will be able to occur easily. Buckhorn Flat (Compliance) The project is located within the Fremont Allotment (Buckhorn Flat Pasture). This pasture has not been utilized by livestock for a number of years due to lack of vegetation. If the project were successful, the pasture could be encompassed into a rest rotation grazing management system that has been identified for the allotment. Encompassing the pasture into the grazing management system is expected to improve the vegetative community within the pasture in the long-term. Swayback Knoll (Compliance) The project areas is located within the Bone Hollow (Middle Pasture) Allotment. The season of use is from November 15th - March 15th and from April 15th - June 15th. A three pasture grazing rotation has been identified within the allotment, which restricts critical growing period to 1 our of 3 years in each pasture.
Methods:
The project has been flagged and GPS'd. The BLM will provide overall project oversight for treatment implementation. The following provides information pertaining to the treatment: Buckhorn Flat (Phase 1) - Chain and Aerial Seed 600 acres Swayback Knoll (Phase 1) - Chain and Aerial Seed 300 acres
Monitoring:
Monitoring of the site has been ongoing and primarily consisted of nested frequency, line intercept and utilization. Prior to the treatment general wildlife use surveys, raptor nest surveys and noxious weed monitoring will occur. Pre and post monitoring will help determine the success of the treatment. In addition, project inspectors will be available to monitor the contract to ensure that all specifications are adhered to.
Partners:
UPDOG and UPDRIT, which is comprised of partners from USFWS, DWR, local County governments, etc... DWR and BLM have had multiple field tours to discuss how to improve mule deer winter range in the project areas. Livestock permittees - livestock management
Future Management:
As discussed, the project areas are located within the Bone Hollow and Fremont Allotments. The Buckhorn Flat project area is located in the Fremont Allotment, which has been assessed through the permit renewal process. Grazing management systems that identified livestock numbers, season of use and AUMs were identified through this process. The Fremont Allotment has authorized livestock grazing from May 1st - October 31st for cattle. This project area has not been utilized by livestock for many years. If the project is successful it could be incorporated into the overall grazing management system for the allotment. The Swayback Knoll project area is located in the Bone Hollow Allotment. This area can be utilized from November 15th - March 15th and from April 15th - June 15th. A three pasture grazing rotation has been identified within the allotment, which restricts critical growing period to 1 our of 3 years in each pasture. The treatment will be rested from livestock grazing for a minimum of two years following treatment. The Swayback Knoll project area already has a fence around it and the Buckhorn Flat Pasture has not been utilized for many years. Therefore, resting the areas from livestock grazing will be able to occur easily. Vegetative monitoring data including utilization and nested frequency will continue to be collected within the allotment. Future maintenance projects to protect investments have been addressed and allowed through the project planning document (NEPA). A large amount of treatment methods have been identified and authorized for use within the Project Area.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The project is expected to improve health, composition, and diversity of grasses, forbs and shrubs in accordance with Rangeland Health Standards and Guidelines and the Ecological Site Description, which will be beneficial to livestock grazing. Utilization within the allotment has not yet been an issue within the majority of the allotments. If successful, the project will provide additional forage, which will provide for improved livestock distribution. The scale of forage availability will be largely dependent upon yearly precipitation amounts; however, it is expected that adequate amounts will be available due to the project area being located at 5,500 feet. The project is expected to promote short-term and long-term recreational big game hunting and wildlife viewing opportunities throughout the area. Mule deer are prevalent within the project area. A large number of hunters and people who like to view wildlife frequent this area throughout the year. As discussed in the livestock grazing portion of the sustainable uses of natural resources section, the treatment will maintain/improve health, composition and diversity of grasses and forbs in accordance with Rangeland Health Standards and Guidelines and the Ecological Site Description. The area is located within critical winter mule deer habitat. The project is expected to be beneficial to mule deer populations by converting an unsuitable vegetative community to something that is more desirable for mule deer; thereby, improving the hunting and viewing opportunities within the area.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$190,267.00 $0.00 $190,267.00 $25,000.00 $215,267.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Archaeological Clearance Archeology Clearance funding provided by BLM for 900 acres @ $23.70 within the project area. $21,330.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services 900 acres mechanical equipment contract (i.e. chaining) Buckhorn Flat Costs -Mechanical equipment contract (i.e. chaining) 600 acres @ $75.00/acre. Swayback Knoll Flat Costs -Mechanical equipment contract (i.e. chaining) 300 acres @ $75.00/acre. $67,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Personal Services (permanent employee) Cedar City Field Office provided one permanent employee to coordinate project design, layout, and oversee monitoring and inventory completed by seasonal employees and project inspection. $0.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 2022
Personal Services (seasonal employee) The Cedar City Field Office has provided seasonal employees to carry out all monitoring (pre and post treatment) identified in the monitoring section. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2022
Archaeological Clearance Archaeological Clearance Contract Administration $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 2022
Seed (GBRC) Aerial Seed 661 acres @ $98.71/acre. $65,267.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Aerial Seeding (1 Flight) - 900 acres @ $7.00/acre (perennial grass and forb) $6,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Aerial Seeding (2 Flight) - 900 acres @ $7.00/acre $6,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
NEPA Chipman Peak Vegetation Enhancement Project (DOI-BLM-UT-C010-2015-0026-EA) Fremont Habitat Improvement Project (DOI-BLM-UT-C010-2016-0054). $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2022
Seed (GBRC) Remainder of Aerial Seed funding 239 acres @ $98.71/acre provided by BLM. $23,570.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$306,000.00 $0.00 $306,000.00 $25,378.28 $331,378.28
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) A098 Mod 6; Chaining, Seed, Aerial Flight, etc...- 900 acres. Chaining - $75/acre Seed - $98.71/acre Aerial Flight - $7 acre (2 Flights) In Kind - Includes personal services (Administration, Cadastral, Monitoring, Survey and Design, etc...). $112,053.90 $0.00 $25,000.00 2022
BLM Wildlife A094 Mod 9 $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
BLM (Range) A097 Mod 9 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
BLM (T&E) A098 Mod 6 $12,946.10 $0.00 $0.00 2023
BLM Fuels A099 Mod 10 EBLM1774 - $150k Lop and Scatter $150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $378.28 2023
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Loss of Genetic Exchange / Inbreeding Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Medium
Project Comments
Comment 02/03/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Nicki Frey
Dan, Thanks for presenting your project to the Southwest Desert LWG. The group felt that this project would benefit Greater sage-grouse via: creating habitat connectivity, increasing travel corridors
Comment 02/07/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Danny Summers
Was drill seeding considered as it is usually a more effective seeding method? Have any herbicide applications been considered to control competition with seeded species to help ensure greater success?
Comment 02/10/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Dan Fletcher
Danny - Thanks for the comment. Drill seeding was considered in the area. Portions of this area are similar to Milford Flat and are subject to windblown erosion. The BLM chained the public lands and immediately adjacent the private landowner drill seeded his private land. The private landowner redrilled his private acres multiple times before conditions were just right for the seeding to establish. BLM was successful in treating the area just once. Although there is some cheatgrass within the area proposed for treatment it is dominated by tansy mustard. The area has been approved for herbicide treatment and will be reassessed following treatment to determine the amount of cheatgrass that is present. Herbicide treatment could occur in in phase 2 of the project.
Comment 02/10/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Danny Summers
Thanks Dan
Comment 02/07/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
I'm with Danny on that Swayback site especially, similar to Ericas Cottonwood proposal. Lets visit and be sure we look at historic attempts and inform this attempt with best practices based on what we saw on previouos attempts here. Its a tough site, we want to win there too, but lets be sure we are confident we aren't just dropping $$. I would like to see small scale attempts inform future decisions rather than full projects with a good chance of failure. In your management plans section you reference the Southwest Desert Mule Deer plan, these 2 sites are on the Panguitch Lake Unit and Beaver Unit.
Comment 02/10/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Dan Fletcher
Gary - Thanks for the comment. Please see comment response for Danny. Phase 1 of the Swayback Knoll area encompasses 300 acres and the Buckhorn Flat area is 600 acres. There are approximately 4,000 acres within these areas that could be treated in the future. We could employ a similar approach as the Buckhorn Flat area and treat 50% of the Swayback area. The treatment could occur in strips as identified in the Buckhorn Flat area. This could serve as a test plot for the area. From everything that I can find it appears that previous treatments identified native seeding in the Swayback area. In this proposal an aggressive seed mix has been identified. This is expected to give this site the best chance of success. Thanks for the catch on the Mule Deer unit management plans. I have updated this section.
Comment 02/02/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Nicki Frey
Dan, the future management section does a good job at explaining the project as it relates to grazing. What will be done to ensure it's success for Utah Prairie Dogs (as your highest ranked species of conservation need)?
Comment 02/02/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dan Fletcher
Nicki - Thanks for the comment. As you know this area is dominated by annual forbs with limited perennials. The best way to ensure success in this area is to identify an aggressive seed mix to compete with the annuals. Long-term I would expect that the Swayback portion of the project area would allow for UPD expansion from existing colonies. The It is expected that the Buckhorn Flat portion of the project may provide for short-term UPD translocation opportunities
Comment 02/12/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Dan, I have 2 questions. 1) is the Swayback Knoll portion not getting a 2 year rest? Young grasses can be pulled out of the ground even in dormant cycle. 2) Is the seeding of sagebrush for deer compatible with the prairie dog management plans?
Comment 02/16/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dan Fletcher
Scott -- thanks for the questions and reviewing my project proposal. 1. Is the Swayback Knoll portion not getting a 2 year rest? Young grasses can be pulled out of the ground even in dormant cycle. Response: A rest period has been identified for both of the areas (Buckhorn Flat and Swayback Knoll). I had this identified in the compliance section as follows: The treatment will be rested from livestock grazing following treatment. The Swayback Knoll project area already has a fence around it and the Buckhorn Flat Pasture has not been utilized for many years. Therefore, resting the areas from livestock grazing will be able to occur easily. I will add this statement to the Future Management section for reference. These areas should be pretty easy to rest because they have fencing that can make them inaccessible when livestock are grazing within the allotments. 2. Is the seeding of sagebrush for deer compatible with the prairie dog management plans? Response: It is expected that sagebrush can be planted in areas within the project area that have not been identified as opportunity areas for UPD habitat. There are quite a few acres identified within the project area and this would be determined.
Comment 01/07/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Will you add 2 additional actions to your map features showing that they will have a primary and secondary seeding? Thanks.
Comment 01/07/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Liz Dodson
It is updated now. Thanks.
Comment 08/14/2023 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please update your map features with the actions/treatments that were finally used to complete the project. Sounds like you changed it from being an anchor chain to a chain harrow and only one application of seed. When you have completed that, please go back to the Completion Form and finalize your report again so I know that it has been completed. Thanks.
Comment 08/31/2023 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
In the Final Methods section of the Completion Report, will you add a few more details on the treatments such as how many acres were harrowed, dates of seeding and harrowing, the rate of aerial seeding, contractors who aerial seeded and harrowed. Thanks
Completion
Start Date:
01/02/2023
End Date:
04/12/2023
FY Implemented:
2023
Final Methods:
The area is located within the Bone Hollow and the Fremont Allotments and was aerially seeded and chain harrowed. There was 900 acres aerially seeded through a contract. This acreage was chain harrowed by BLM Fuels staff between January 2 and April 12, 2023. The project took a little longer than expected due to wet conditions.
Project Narrative:
This area is important habitat for Greater Sage Grouse and Utah Prairie Dog, as well as crucial mule deer winter range and livestock grazing. The area was aerially seeded and chain harrowed. The seeding consisted of an aggressive seed mix consisting of perennial grasses and forbs. Undesirable species including mustard were present throughout the project area, which is why such an aggressive seed mix was identified for the area. The project is focused on re-establishing wildlife habitats; specifically, for Utah prairie dog and Sage Grouse with a diverse mix of warm and cool season grasses and perennial forbs.
Future Management:
A mandatory two year (growing season) minimum rest period has been initiated for the portion of the allotment that was drill seeded. The project area is located within the Bone Hollow and Fremont Allotments. The season of use within the Bone Hollow Allotment is from November 15th - June 15th. A three-pasture grazing management system that provides critical growing period rest two out of three years has been identified within the allotment. The season of use within the Fremont Allotment is from May 1st - October 31st. An eight pasture grazing management system that provides for critical growing period rest has been identified in the allotment. The grazing system is expected to provide for long-term viability of the drill seeding.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8633 Terrestrial Treatment Area Chain harrow > 15 ft. (1-way)
8633 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
8634 Terrestrial Treatment Area Chain harrow > 15 ft. (1-way)
8634 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
Project Map
Project Map