Shingle Mill Phase 2
Project ID: 5230
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Mark Atwood
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Monticello Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southeastern
Description:
This is the second phase of a collaborative, multi-year project to improve vegetation, wildlife habitat, and watershed conditions across a 10,676 acre USFS tract of land, plus adjacent surrounding private properties. Phase two will entail mechanical mastication on 1536 acres of federal lands and 638 acres of private lands.
Location:
The project area is in the North Fork of Verdure Creek, North Fork of South Creek, South Creek, Shingle Mill Draw, and the pipeline drainage. This phase of implementation involves USFS land in the foothills of the Abajo mountains. This project is within the top 20% (Very High) airshed area of the Utah shared stewardship program.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Shingle Mill project has been a high priority area for years and has had interest and buy-in from many agencies due largely to being part of the Monticello City municipal watershed, being a key winter and transitional wildlife range, its proximity to WUI and communities at risk, and ongoing soil erosion and increasingly homogenous vegetation. This project addresses the health, productivity, and resiliency of soil and vegetation resources in the South Creek, Bull Hollow, and Verdure watersheds near Monticello. Pinyon-juniper encroachment results in increased soil erosion. By removing pinyon-juniper and deciduous shrubs and creating mosaics of diverse age classes and structure, as well as establishing grasses and forbs, water will more readily infiltrate the soil and remain in the system. Dense tracts of pinyon-juniper are a big concern for stand replacing wildfire, which tends to sterilize soil and cause hydrophobic soil. Removing sections of trees will help to slow down fire spread and intensity, and help to prevent invasive species like cheatgrass from establishing post-fire. These vegetation treatments will essentially replace the function of fire in the ecosystem and help maintain watershed health. Additionally, the project area contains water pipes and infrastructure that supply the city of Monticello with drinking water. If there were a fire in the area, it could devastate this infrastructure. Vegetation: The proposed treatments will create vegetation density, structures, and ladder fuels closer to historic conditions, thereby restoring the role of fire in the project area and reducing Condition Class from high (3) and moderate (2) to low (1). A creation of mosaic of age classes and structure in the Gambel oak and mountain shrub types will move these stands and the landscape toward properly functioning conditions. Improvement of the quality and productivity of shrub and herbaceous understory vegetation will benefit mule deer and elk in this winter and transition range; it will also benefit pollinator habitat. Wildlife: This project aims to remove encroaching pinyon and juniper, gambel oak, serviceberry and other shrubs in order to improve the quality and productivity of shrub and herbaceous understory vegetation for important mule deer and elk winter and transition range. The resulting mosaic of vegetation age and seral structure will improve habitat diversity and forage production for wildlife and livestock. Fire: As a result of wildfire suppression and climatic changes, pinyon juniper and deciduous shrubs have encroached into historic sage and meadow openings in this landscape. Removal of a portion of the woody vegetation will replace the function of fire in the ecosystem and help to maintain watershed health by mimicking fire occurrence at historic intervals, intensity and severity. This will improve habitat as well as reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire. If such fire did occur here, it could result in risk to two nearby communities, firefighter and emergency responder safety, private citizens, Monticello City watershed infrastructure, wildlife, recreation, and homes and other structures. In addition, unplanned fire could result in sterilized soil conditions, erosion, and reduced ground cover. This project aims to reduce the continuity, size, and class of fuels, and thereby reduce fire risk and threat in the area.
Objectives:
Create a mosaic of vegetation age/seral structure to improve habitat diversity and forage production for wildlife and livestock. Improve the quality and productivity of shrub and herbaceous understory vegetation on important mule deer and elk winter and transition range, and for wild turkeys and other wildlife. Reduce the risk of stand-replacing crown fire within the wildland-urban interface adjacent to private in-holdings and the Forest boundary, including reducing the risk from wildfire to life and property, reducing the risk of damage to vegetation, soil, and watershed resources from wildfire. Increase resistance and resilience of forest and woodland vegetation and watersheds in this landscape to climate related stressors (drought, wildfire, insects, and disease) by encouraging a mosaic of vegetative conditions (species, age, and density). Improve watershed conditions by improving upland vegetation composition and productivity, increasing ground cover and reducing soil and gully erosion.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
This project focuses on pinyon/juniper removal and oak disturbance as a means to maintain diverse, healthy mountain brush habitats. The herbaceous understory and sagebrush openings are at risk of being lost due to the increasing density of pinyon and juniper trees, overly dense oakbrush and subsequent wildfire. Wildfire may also reach the canopy of the scattered ponderosa pine trees. The summer/transition range has shown declining trends due to a lack of disturbance, fire suppression, drought and over-utilization by wildlife and livestock. As the conditions in these areas decline so does herd health for wildlife and livestock in the area.
Relation To Management Plan:
1. The project is consistent with the Standards and Guidelines of the Manti-La Sal Forest Land and Resource Management Plan of 1986, as amended. *Minimize hazards from wildfire - Reduce fuel loading, stand and crown/canopy density, and resultant fire hazard to vegetation, the public, private property, and firefighters (LRMP III-5). *Maintain/improve habitat capability through direct treatment of vegetation (LRMP III-23). *Provide habitat needs for deer and elk (LRMP III-19), especially improving the cover:forage ratio. *The Utah Fire Amendment has a goal to reduce hazard fuels. The full range of fuel reduction methods is authorized, consistent with forest and management area emphasis and direction. *Certain vegetative types are to be managed such that varying successional stages will be present to provide for a high level of vegetative diversity and productivity (III-2). Pinyon-juniper stands on gentle slopes and on lands with good soils will be treated periodically to maintain early successional stages (III-8). Intensive management practices would maintain structural diversity within the woody species in at least 25 percent of the area covered by the Gambel oak and mountain shrub type. In some cases, the Gambel oak would be encouraged to successionally develop as an open savannah or in a high seral stage (III-9). 2. National Fire Plan *Designed to manage the potential impacts of wildland fire to communities and ecosystems and to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildland fire *The NFP focuses on strategies for improving fire preparedness, restoring and rehabilitating burned areas, reducing hazardous fuels, assisting communities, and identifying research needs 3. San Juan County CWPP The CWPP highlights the Shingle Mill project area as a high priority for fuel reduction need. 4. San Juan County Resource Management Plan Objectives and policies from the county plan include: *Forests, woodlands, rangelands, watersheds, and habitats are healthy and resilient and are managed for multiple use. *Support the use of various vegetation manipulation tools (such as mechanical, chemical, biological, prescribed and controlled wildland fire and livestock grazing) to enhance production of wildlife and livestock habitat and forage and improve watershed and water quality conditions on woodland areas with potential for improved ecological condition. *Actively manage forests and woodlands to reduce the potential for catastrophic wildfire. *Impacts of wildfire on the health, safety and property of county residents as well as valuable natural and cultural resources are prevented or minimized. *Use fuel reduction techniques such as conifer reduction, grazing, prescribed fire, chemical, biological, and mechanical treatments appropriate for site characteristics. *Support land management practices that contribute to or maintain healthy watershed conditions. *Support the implementation of rangeland improvement projects including brush control, seeding projects, pinion and juniper removal, noxious and invasive weed control, and livestock water developments. 5. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule Deer 2014-2019 *Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range. *Initiate broad scale vegetative treatment projects to improve mule deer habitat with emphasis on drought or fire damaged sagebrush winter ranges, ranges that are being taken over by invasive annual grass species, and ranges being diminished by encroachment of conifers into sagebrush or aspen habitats. *Encourage land managers to manage portions of pinion-juniper woodlands and aspen/conifer forests in early successional stages. Convert habitats back to young, vigorous shrub-dominated communities *Work with land management agencies and private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deer habitats, especially fawning and wintering areas. 6. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Elk 2015-2022 *Maintain sufficient habitat to support elk herds at population objectives and reduce competition for forage between elk and livestock. *Reduce adverse impacts to elk herds and elk habitat. *Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. *Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional Watershed Restoration Initiative working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats that are in need of enhancement or restoration. 7. Deer Herd Unit Management Plan Deer Herd Unit # 14 San Juan October 2015 *Protect, maintain, and/or improve deer habitat through direct range improvements to support and maintain herd population management objectives. *Work with federal, private, and state partners to improve crucial deer habitats through the WRI process. 8. Elk Herd Unit Management Plan Elk Herd Unit #14 San Juan August 2016 * Maintain and improve winter foraging areas through browse regeneration and pinyon-juniper removal projects. 9. Utah Wildlife Action Plan Gambel Oak and mountain sagebrush are Key Habitats in the 2015-2025 Plan Recommendations to improve condition include: *Promoting policies and management that allow fire to return to a more natural regime. *Promoting and funding restoration that reduces the uncharacteristic class, including cutting mulching of invading pinyon and juniper trees, and herbicide or mechanical treatment. *single tree mulching/cutting invading conifer in the mountain sagebrush type. 10. Montezuma Creek and Lower San Juan-Four Corners Watershed Coordinated Resource Management Plan The Shingle Mill project is part of the watershed implementation strategy in the watershed plan. The project addresses several specific resource concerns regarding soil and vegetation, and follows recommendations to thin/masticate pinyon-juniper and reduce gambel oak. 11. Utah's Wild Turkey Management Plan *The plan objective is to maintain and improve wild turkey populations. One of the strategies identified to reach this objective is to do habitat projects. This project will help to achieve this objective. *The plan also identifies as an objective increasing habitat quantity and quality for turkeys by 40,000 acres statewide by 2020. This project will help to achieve this by increasing herbaceous foraging habitat for turkeys.
Fire / Fuels:
The project area is located on the east side of the Abajo Mountains above the town of Monticello. It is located within the Monticello city municipal watershed and WUI (wildland-urban interface) area. Private property borders the 10,676 acre USFS project area. 1,300 treatment acres are on private lands next to homes and outbuildings. In 2018 the Southeast Catastrophic fire committee classified the Shingle Mill area as one of the top priority areas to focus efforts in addressing high fire risk and intensity. Partners on this committee included members of Federal and Utah State land agencies, Emergency Management coordinators for several counties, County Commissioners, and members of the public. According to UWRAP (Utah Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal), the Phase I treatment area ranges from moderate to high wildfire risk and threat severity. The area is primarily Fire Regime III (3) and Condition Class 2, with a moderate departure from historical conditions. The historical conditions were mostly sagebrush, grasses and other shrubs. Climatic change, fire suppression and other factors have led to pinyon, juniper and Gambel oak encroachment in these areas. Fuels in the current state pose a hazard to fire personnel, private citizens, agricultural land and animals, structures, and infrastructure. Within the project area, there are pipeline and collection structures for Monticello's culinary water system. A fire in the area would pose a significant threat to these structures and therefore water sources for the city. The removal of live and dead fuels will reduce the severity and intensity of wildfire on the landscape. It will reduce the fire regime condition class (FRCC) on approximately 2260 acres (total project area, not just Phase Two). Vegetation treatment will create vegetation density, structures, and ladder fuels closer to historic conditions; thereby restoring the role of fire in the project area and reducing Condition Class from high (3) and moderate (2) to low (1) in this Fire Regime area that is adjacent to the private inholdings and the Forest boundary. This will make it safer for firefighters to manage an unplanned ignition within this area. Treatment will also reduce risk to two communities at risk (Monticello, approx. 2 aerial miles away from nearest treatment area, and Blue Mountain Ranch approx. 0.5 aerial miles from nearest treatment area), permanent infrastructure (including power lines and water collection), Monticello city watershed, dispersed and developed recreation sites, and critical wildlife habitat. Treatment will reduce risk to homes in the Verdure Creek valley with the nearest home being 100 feet away from a proposed mastication area. It will create a mosaic of age classes and structure in the Gambel oak and mountain shrub types, moving these stands and the landscape toward historic and properly functioning conditions.
Water Quality/Quantity:
It is the Forest Service's responsibility to ensure that activities implemented by the Forest include appropriate best management and other practices to protect water resources. Project design, site specific recommendations and the incorporation of SWCPs during project implementation mitigate concerns for watershed and water quality. By reducing the risk of severe, large scale wildfire in the project area, the actions will protect watershed values from damage to soils that result in reduced infiltration and increased runoff in the short term and loss of top soil and subsequent reduction in soil productivity in the long term. The project is designed to increase percent effective ground cover, reduce soil loss due to erosion and reduce the potential amount of area in detrimental soil condition (as from severe fire, compaction or displacement). Monitoring of similar treatments on other areas of the Manti-La Sal National Forest with similar equipment found no detrimental soil compaction from several passes of the machine on the soil surface. The chips from the mulching added additional ground cover. Soil bulk density following use of the Brush Hog was similar to non-treated or control areas. The total effective ground cover in the Brush Hog (Pinyon-Juniper chipped) areas was higher due to wood chips than non-treated areas. Areas dominated by pinyon-juniper produce limited understory vegetation and the bare soil inter-spaces are prone to soil loss by erosion. Herbaceous vegetation is important in impeding overland flow and is effective at reducing soil erosion. Both the potential increase in herbaceous vegetation and the masticated tree material should help stabilize the soils by reducing erosion and protect the water quality throughout the watershed. Pinyon-juniper trees alter the amount and distribution of water that reaches the soil, intercepting 10-20% of precipitation according to Horman et al. 1999. By removing PJ this should allow for more precipitation to contact the soil and increase biomass on the ground. Pinyon-juniper expansion into areas that historically had greater forbs and grasses present impedes streamflow for off-site (downstream) uses (Folliott 2012). Because PJ is very competitive for water this often reduces grasses and forbs within the area, leading to bare soil. "The increase in bare soil, particularly in the spaces between trees, typically leads to increased runoff and soil loss as the juniper infestation increases" (Thurow 1997). Increased runoff and sediment load, decrease water yield and water quality within the watershed. Studies have shown that an evaluation of alternatives using conversion treatments to enhance stream-flow in the PJ should be made (Barr 1956). A recent publication by Roundy et al. 2014 showed that phase 3 juniper removal can increase available moisture for more than 3 weeks in the spring. And removing juniper from phase 1 and 2 stands can increase water from 6-20 days respectively. Because juniper are prolific water users they readily out compete understory species which eventually die off.
Compliance:
Archaeological surveys have been conducted. The level of analysis for this project is a CE under authority of 36 CFR 220.6 (e)(6) - Timber stand and/or wildlife habitat improvement activities which do not include the use of herbicides or do not require more than one mile of low standard road construction. The Decision Memo for this project is signed. Proposed activities meet the goals and management direction provided by the Forest Plan.
Methods:
Treatments for this phase of the Shingle Mill project will utilize a combination of mechanized bull hog (fecon head) mastication of pinyon/juniper and Gambel oak and hand-thinning with chainsaws to remove encroaching pinyon pine and juniper trees from sage and mountain brush areas. Group selection regeneration treatments will be applied to Gambel oak, serviceberry, and birch leaf mountain-mahogany to regenerate a portion of the mid-aged and mature vegetation to diversify stand structure and provide more palatable plants for wildlife forage. There will be a mosaic of larger oak left to provide forage (acorns) for wildlife, including black bears and turkeys. The treatment of the basal re-sprouting shrubs (oak and other mountain browse) will create diverse age classes, better vigor and increased leader growth for forage for big game. Some areas, particularly the lower elevation portions, may be seeded to enhance understory diversity and production. Thinning and woodland regeneration treatments will emphasize retention of ponderosa pine, pinyon pine, larger mature trees, and clumps/groups of woodland trees. Designation of openings and clumps/corridors will be coordinated with the District Wildlife Biologist. The results of this type of treatment are well-understood and have been successful in similar areas on the Abajo and La Sal Mountains. Portions of the area (375 acres) with mancos clay soils will be seeded with native grass and forb species during the mastication treatment. The elevation, ground cover and good soils in the remainder of the area are conducive to self-reseeding of grasses and forbs.
Monitoring:
*Day-to-day monitoring of contract or force account operations will be completed during implementation by a designated Contractor Officer's Representative (C.O.R.) or by a qualified Forestry Technician. *FS Range personnel will monitor for weeds post-treatment. Existing or new weed populations will be treated in accordance with existing noxious weed management decisions. *An interdisciplinary review will be conducted following implementation (within two years) to determine if project objectives have been met and to determine whether implementation of project design features has been effective. *Photo points will be established (by USFS personnel) to identify pre and post-treatment conditions, as well as long-term monitoring points for future reference. Post-treatment photos will be taken within 3 years post-treatment. *Monitoring of raptor nests in the project area will be continued annually by the USFS. *The interdisciplinary review and post-treatment photos will be uploaded to the WRI database upon completion (in the aforementioned 2- and 3-year time frames, respectively).
Partners:
The Shingle Mill Vegetation Management Project is in an area important to San Juan County and the City of Monticello for watershed, wildlife habitat and recreation. Partners for the current phase of the project include the USFS, NRCS (representing the adjacent private landowner), FFSL, DWR and the livestock permittee. There is high interest in this project from local sportsmen groups, who funded the original archaeology surveys in the early days of UPCD/WRI. All partners shared in the planning and writing of this project and grant submission. Rangeland, fire and wildlife factors on private property were represented by NRCS, FFSL, and DWR respectively, while USFS represented fire and vegetation and planning on the federal side.
Future Management:
The area being treated is federal lands that are managed for multiple use. The area will continue to be managed for uses such as grazing, recreation including hunting, wildlife and overall ecosystem health. Mechanical treatments as well as prescribed fire will continue to be a way to maintain diverse age classes and vegetation communities in the area. The oak, mountain brush and sagebrush areas have an herbaceous understory component, so the need for seeding is not anticipated in this phase. No changes to livestock management are anticipated at this time, but utilization and trend monitoring will continue and adaptive management can be applied if required. The Abajo deer herd has been 70-80% of population objective. Elk on the San Juan unit are at objective. Turkey populations are increasing on the Abajos. DWR will continue to strive to achieve and maintain objectives for big game and turkeys according to management plans on the Abajo Mountains.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The project area in Phase 2 is in the North Creek and Lakes/South Peak cattle allotment of the USFS. The proposed treatment would decrease the amount of woody vegetation (especially pinyon-juniper, oak) on 332 acres of the North Creek allotment and 1204 acres of The Lakes/ south peak allotment. This will lead to an increased production of herbaceous vegetation (grass and forb species) on up to 1536 acres. This will allow the area to be more resilient to grazing and drought. With the treatments and amount of herbaceous vegetation that will be released as well as the resprouting of desirable woody species it is anticipated that along with water improvements taking place as well as the release of more water through the removal of PJ and other shrubs that increased distribution will occur. Noxious weeds are not expected to increase or spread as a result of the treatments as best management practices will be implemented. Site visits found little cheatgrass in the areas to be treated and the risk of cheatgrass being established as a result of the project is very low, due to the existing diversity and healthy grass production of most of the understory layers and because of the elevation. Any other noxious weeds in the area would continue to be treated. In the short-term there could be some interruption of grazing operations; however the long-term benefits to the range resource outweigh the short-term negative impacts that may have to occur to individual permit holders such as resting pastures or exclusion of livestock from areas. Mule deer hunting is popular on the USFS side of the fence as well, as is hunting for turkey and other small game. Being close to town, the area is also very popular for off-road/atv recreation and camping.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$604,374.00 $183,810.00 $788,184.00 $20,000.00 $808,184.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Bullhog $350/acre for 1536 acres for FS lands. Bullhog $66.60/acre for private land 638 acres with NRCS cost share to get to a total of $350/acre. NRCS will pay remaining $283.40 $580,091.00 $180,810.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) Administrative work done in the field and office for contract administration $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2020
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Seasonal employee (USFS) to help facilitate pre and post surveys and contract administration $0.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) DWR time to administer project $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2021
Personal Services (seasonal employee) DWR seasonal to help administer project $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Motor Pool Vehicle expenses (DWR) $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Seed (GBRC) native seed mix for Mx treatment areas and for rehabilitating access routes in the Watershed Treatment Area portion of the Shingle Mill project area - 375 acres $18,283.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$604,374.00 $183,810.00 $788,184.00 $20,000.00 $808,184.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (UWRI) $584,374.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) $0.00 $180,810.00 $0.00 2021
United States Forest Service (USFS) $0.00 $3,000.00 $10,000.00 2021
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2021
Shared Stewardship $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Habitat Council Account $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Black Rosy-finch N4
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Black-tailed Jackrabbit
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Ferruginous Hawk N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Cottontail R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Utah Milksnake N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Project Comments
Comment 01/14/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Gibson
We're finding that Pinyon Jays likely start breeding earlier than most migratory birds (more in line with most raptors) so timing in PJ removal projects should consider this if possible. Additionally, when possible, favor leaving larger, masting, pinyon pines when leaving trees in islands or as part of the mosiac. Good luck!
Comment 01/14/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Mark Atwood
great comment. The current intent of this projects implementation time frame would be after Aug 31st. This should avoid most of the nesting and breeding seasons for birds. The Pinyon Pine trees will be identified in the contracting of this project as desirable over the juniper.
Comment 01/14/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Gibson
Sound good, thanks!
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Mitchell
Great project! This area serves has an important fawning ground for the Abajo deer herd. I'm glad to see that you are planning to leave some mature oak stands. Besides providing mast crops in the fall, these mature stands typically have a lush grass component in the spring, important to deer at that time.
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Mark Atwood
Thanks for comment and thoughts!
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Maybe a little more info on the seeding please. It's a pretty light mix. The areas you are seeding, is this just to supplement passive re-veg? Some photos would be nice to see the project area.
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Barb Smith
I am open to suggestions on the seed mix. The focus on these units in the "watershed" part of the project area is to increase ground cover on the predominately mancos shale, highly erosive, soils. Western wheatgrass does really well in this area, and I didn't think too many other grasses or forbs would be able to compete with it there. These areas have some big sagebrush already, but a limited herbaceous understory. I will add a few photos.
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Tyler Thompson
Please remove the "affected area" from your map and replace it with the appropriate treatment such as "full sized bullhog" you also need to upload a shapefile showing where the 375 acres of seed will be located.
Comment 01/22/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Barb Smith
I changed the Mx treatment units to bullhog, but then I cannot also include another, overlapping terrestrial treatment area so for now I included the seeding units as affected area. In this case it would not work to do an additional treatment to the whole project area, as only a portion is to be seeded.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Barb - If you upload that polygon in a separate shapefile then you can add 2 actions to the feature. I am guessing this is the one you called about last week when I was swamped. Let me know if you still need help with this.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Barb Smith
I think I got it now, thanks. Instead of having a shapefile just for the seeding, I split the Mx project into 2 shapefiles and added seeding as an additional action to the appropriate one.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Perfect! Thanks Barb!
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
There is no mention of the method of the seeding portion of the project in the Methods or the Budget. Make sure you have included what you need.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Barb Smith
Seeding is tied back to the Objectives section about increasing ground cover to improve watershed conditions. The Methods section is where it talks about seeding on 375 acres that will be masticated, and a seed mix from GRBC ($18, 283) is included.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Barb - I should clarify by question. I saw that you had the seed mix in the budget but wasn't sure how you were going to apply the seed and if you needed to budget for an aerial contract.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Barb Smith
As for my Harpole Mesa project, I plan to include a provision for seeding in the mastication contract so it will be ground-based application just prior to or during implementation of the mastication. The units to be seeded are oddly shaped and separate on the landscape, so aerial seeding does not seem to be practical in this case.
Comment 01/27/2020 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thanks!
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
8909 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
9242 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
9242 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Ground (mechanical application)
9253 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
Project Map
Project Map