Tie Fork BDA - 3
Project ID: 5275
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: 538
Project Manager: Justin Robinson
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Kamas/Heber Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Central
Description:
Install 50-60 BDA's on Tie Fork. Year 3 work will be from near West Canyon then upstream 0.3 miles. This should be the final BDA phase before road removal and trail construction begins.
Location:
Tie Fork drainage is a tributary to Soldier Creek in Utah County. Project area starts 1.7 miles north of Highway 6. 12 S 481690 E, 4424645 N.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Tie Fork has historically suffered from stream bed incision events. Channel is currently in a incised (no flood plain connectivity) yet stable healing state, but fish habitat (Bonneville cutthroat trout and Southern leatherside chub) is reduced from historic levels. In areas with beaver activity, habitat quantity and quality are mark-able increased. Unfortunately beaver are not occupying all available habitat on this stream.
Objectives:
Our objective with this project is to create starter dams and beaver dam analogs in beaverless areas to entice beaver to spread out. If beaver do not occupy starter dams the dams will mimic beaver activity. With the overall objective of having beaver dams or our analogs aggrading the stream bed for flood plane connectivity, fish habitat enhancement and intraining sediments for increased water quality. This last point is especially valid post Tank Hollow fire. Side benefits to deer, elk and other wildlife (bats, neotropicals, etc.) will also be realized with a healthier riparian corridor
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Southern leatherside chubs have been surveyed in this stream in the recent past and may still be present outside of studied reaches, any improvement to the system may benefit this imperiled population and the longer we wait the more likely they are to disappear. Bonneville cutthroat are retreating into headwaters in this system to avoid brown trout. Habitat benefits will provide increased competitiveness to BCT and once habitat benefits are realized Phase II of this project sphere will be to remove brown trout and exclude them from this system. Tank Hollow fire was a managed wildfire that burned much of the upper and west sides of this drainage. Most of the fire is not expected to significantly impact the drainage, but some areas are expected to produce higher than normal sedimentation. This is an excellent opportunity to capture a new sediment source; aggrading the channel more rapidly and mitigating the post fire erosional effects.
Relation To Management Plan:
CONSERVATION AGREEMENT AND STRATEGY FOR SOUTHERN LEATHERSIDE (LEPIDOMEDA ALICIAE) IN THE STATE OF UTAH. 2010. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Publication Number 10-19, Salt Lake City, UT. RANGE-WIDE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT AND STRATEGY FOR BONNEVILLE CUTTHROAT TROUT (Oncorhynchus clarki utah). Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Publication Number 00-19, Salt Lake City, UT. Both plans cite that loss of habitat and habitat alteration are one of the main contributors to species decline. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Water Quality Analysis of the Soldier Creek Watershed. 2006. Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality, Salt Lake City, UT Discusses the water quality effects of sediment and associated nutrients to downstream water quality and identifies Tie Fork as a contributor with a needed reduction. BDA's reduce downstream sediment transport. Uinta Forest Plan - 2003 Land and Resource Management Plan, Uinta National Forest: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/uwcnf/landmanagement/planning/?cid=stelprdb5076960&width=full -Plan sites management of riparian areas (pg 2.2), management of aquatic species (pg 2.3), wildlife (pg 2.5), and vegetation (pg 2.5).
Fire / Fuels:
During tank Hollow Fire the existing riparian corridor was used as a containment line, but fuels had to be removed from the edges to produce a wider fuel-free break. With increased riparian width this would have been unnecessary. With the proximity of the road and the possibility of future ignitions this may be important. During Tank Hollow Fire some portions in Tie Fork burned as a very hot wildfire. These areas have been modeled to have a high likely hood of large increases in sediment movement from hill slopes to the stream. Post fire sediment retention would be realized with a wider riparian buffer to halt debris flows and BDA's to capture sediment that does enter the stream.
Water Quality/Quantity:
A significant portion of this project is geared at improving water quality. BDA's retain sediment which contains micro-nutrients. These nutrients are contributing to downstream pollution which is identified in the Soldier Creek Watershed TMDL (cited and referenced in Relation to Management Plans). Monitoring will quantify success' of the project. Water Quantity will be enhanced as near bank storage increases at dam site. This water is retained in the system and is usable by fish (drought mitigation), wildlife and vegetation. Down stream water users benefit by an extended hydrograph as the Spanish Fork River system is unregulated.
Compliance:
All compliance's are in hand.
Methods:
We are expecting to install 50-60 BDAs/Starter dams via Conservation Corp crews. Explanation of BDA install: "A complete construction sequence for a BDA would be to first install a line of posts using a hydraulic or pneumatic post pounder, followed by weaving branches in between the posts. An upstream face is then constructed first using cobble and other large material placed at the upstream base to prevent underscour, followed by successive layers of vegetation and finer-grained material until the structure has achieved the desired level of flow permeability and upstream pool depth." from The Beaver Restoration Guidebook. Pollock, M.M., G. Lewallen, K. Woodruff, C.E. Jordan and J.M. Castro (Editors) 2015. The Beaver Restoration Guidebook: Working with Beaver to Restore Streams, Wetlands, and Floodplains. Version 1.0. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 189 pp. Online at: http://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/ToolsForLandowners/RiverScience/Beaver.asp
Monitoring:
Pre and post treatment surveys will be conducted to define channel characteristics including dimension, pattern and profile. These datum will be used to ascertain if channel aggrades, fish habitat is created, fish population responses and if sediments are retained in the stream.
Partners:
UDWR - Central Region Habitat Section is partnering with the USFS to install and analyze effectiveness of BDA's in two regional stream. Aquatics Section and USFS partner to monitor fish populations and their associated habitats. USFS, UDWQ, USU Ext. and Utah Water Watch are developing a Citizen Scientist monitoring program to assess effectiveness of the treatments.
Future Management:
This will be a test of how well BDA's work to aggrade stream bed, increase water quality and aquatic habitat on Tie Fork. If this treatment is successful future BDA's will be installed to further benefits to the system. The recent burn of the tank Hollow fire will add benefit to this project in analyzing the effectiveness of BDA's to retain post fire sedimentation and reduction of downstream impacts. Once BDA's have raised habitat quality to a level that will support BCT the stream will be treated to remove non-natives and a native assemblage will be added. Larger long term plans are to remove the road from the riparian area of Tie Fork, replacing it with a connecting atv train on upland areas - making a loop route that connects to Unicorn Ridge, Diamond Fork area, Indian creek (Strawberry) and White River. Greatly increasing the usability for recreationalists, hunters and fishermen.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The majority of this drainage is a grass bank and may be used in the near future as planned RxB in Indian Creek (adjacent watershed) may displace grazing as the burns heal. The portion currently grazed by sheep will benefit by increased riparian vegetation and a less incised channel making water access easier and reducing bank sloughing.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$21,220.00 $0.00 $21,220.00 $4,337.50 $25,557.50
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Conservation Corp crew to install BDA's 10 persons for 2 weeks @$4400/wk/5 person crew $17,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Materials and Supplies Post, tools, fuel, PPE, misc to install BDA's $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) USFS Biologists to plan and design and oversee project work (10 days) $0.00 $0.00 $4,337.50 2021
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Assist biologists with project $2,620.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$17,600.00 $0.00 $17,600.00 $5,587.50 $23,187.50
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) $0.00 $0.00 $4,337.50 2021
USFS-WRI A128 $17,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) USFS staff went on a detail and so UDWR staff helped to hire and manage contractors. $0.00 $0.00 $1,250.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American Beaver
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures High
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native High
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Southern Leatherside Chub N2
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Relationship Between Groundwater and Surface Water NA
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Relationship Between Groundwater and Surface Water NA
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Relationship Between Groundwater and Surface Water NA
Project Comments
Comment 01/28/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
I'm really glad to see this proposal, Robbie! This is a reminder I need to get with Native Aquatics about re-running the S Leatherside ranking. Having just lost about 40% of its occupied distribution, it might have slipped from N2 into an N1 status. Not good news for the fish, but worth a point next year maybe. Anyway, good luck!
Comment 01/29/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Justin Robinson
Thanks Jimi. We are seeing good results and learning a lot about BDA's in the process. Definitely aiming to see some SLC habitat on the back end of this one.
Comment 02/05/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Lawrence
I wasn't aware that leathersides had been found in Tie Fork in the recent past. Did you have documentation for that? It certainly is in their historic range. Whether they have been observed recently or not, I think this project has great potential to reduce impacts to leathersides in Soldier Creek in the future. Unfortunately, the Pole Creek fire seems to have wiped them out for the time being, but we're working on repatriating them eventually. The BDAs in Tie Fork may also open the opportunity down the road to reintroduce leathersides there.
Comment 02/06/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Justin Robinson
Keith - I went back through my hard copy files, back to 1975, and have no official records of SLC being in Tie Fork proper. There is mention of them being in Soldier Creek below the confluence with Tie. The "sighting" of SLC in Tie comes from an old report that mentions them being seen in an "early survey" but I can not document that. Either way we will do what we can to create some habitat and see if they move in. Or maybe you would like to put some up there in a few years...?
Comment 02/06/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Lawrence
Justin: sounds good and thanks for checking on that. Mostly, I was just curious; been thinking about Tie Fork as a possible place to put leathersides down the road, although the fires have changed that a bit. Hopefully, once we get them reestablished in Solider we can expand their range up into Tie Fork. Possibly introducing spotted frogs into Tie will also be on my radar at least down the road. They used to be all through this area at one time as you're no doubt aware and we've got them as close by as Diamond Fork.
Comment 02/06/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Justin Robinson
That all sounds very good Keith. Let's keep each other up on progress and see what we can do.
Comment 08/23/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Update your map features and fill out the completion form. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Comment 08/26/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion report on time. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion.
Completion
Start Date:
11/16/2020
End Date:
12/16/2020
FY Implemented:
2021
Final Methods:
The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources in partnership with the USFS hired a contractor to come in and build 70 beaver dam analogs in Tie Fork, UT. Through Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative funding and collaboration we were able to help restore the health of this stream. We constructed 70 BDAs in November and December of 2020. These BDAs were made of 2" X4' wood stakes, coconut fiber erosion control blankets, and natural woody materials. These BDAs were no more than 2' tall to reduce the risk of blow outs. So far they have been very successful at holding more sediment and creating deeper pools of water for fish habitat.
Project Narrative:
Tie Fork has historically suffered from stream bed incision events. Channel is currently in an incised (no flood plain connectivity) yet stable healing state, but fish habitat (Bonneville cutthroat trout and Southern leatherside chub) is reduced from historic levels. In areas with beaver activity, habitat quantity and quality have mark-ably increased. Unfortunately beaver are not occupying all available habitat on this stream. Our objective with this project is to create starter dams and beaver dam analogs in beaverless areas to entice beaver to spread out. If beaver do not occupy starter dams the dams will mimic beaver activity. With the overall objective of having beaver dams or our analogs aggrading the stream bed for flood plane connectivity, fish habitat enhancement and entraining sediments for increased water quality. This last point is especially valid post Tank Hollow fire. Side benefits to deer, elk and other wildlife (bats, neotropicals, etc.) will also be realized with a healthier riparian corridor.
Future Management:
This will be a test of how well BDA's work to aggrade stream bed, increase water quality and aquatic habitat on Tie Fork. If this treatment is successful future BDA's will be installed to further benefits to the system. The recent burn of the tank Hollow fire will add benefit to this project in analyzing the effectiveness of BDA's to retain post fire sedimentation and reduction of downstream impacts. Once BDA's have raised habitat quality to a level that will support BCT the stream will be treated to remove non-natives and a native assemblage will be added. Larger long term plans are to remove the road from the riparian area of Tie Fork, replacing it with a connecting atv train on upland areas - making a loop route that connects to Unicorn Ridge, Diamond Fork area, Indian creek (Strawberry) and White River. Greatly increasing the usability for recreationalists, hunters and fishermen.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
9125 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Beaver dam analog
Project Map
Project Map