Ashley National Forest Range Improvement Projects-Cultural
Project ID: 5320
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2022
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Garry Brown
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Ashley National Forest
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Northeastern
Description:
Construct range improvements to protect spring and watershed resources, provide additional water and improve cattle distribution. The project includes water developments, drift fences and spring protection exclosures. NEPA analysis will occur in 2020 and implementation is estimated to occur during the summer of 2021. The requested funding is for cultural clearances for approximately 761 acres associated with the NEPA analysis.
Location:
Uintah, Wasatch and Duchesne Counties. Ashley National Forest. Several locations on the Vernal and Duchesne/Roosevelt Ranger Districts. See table in Images/Document for a list of projects.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The need for this project is to improve livestock distribution and minimize areas of livestock concentration, while protection rangeland resources including springs, streams, and meadows. This need was initiated as grazing management issues were identified by monitoring condition and trend and conducting range improvement inspections. Identified projects that will reduce cattle impacts on critical riparian and meadow resources include moving troughs and pipelines further from spring sources and constructing exclosures around springs. Many Projects will simply modify existing infrastructure improving the aesthetic of the forest. See photos for examples. Providing funding for cultural clearances will help streamline the NEPA process and allow implementation of projects to occur quicker.
Objectives:
The overall goal of the project is to construct several range improvements to increase cattle distribution across the Vernal and Duchesne/Roosevelt Ranger Districts, and in turn protect and improve water and vegetation resources. Objectives include reducing grazing impacts to critical riparian and meadow resources while maintaining the proper number of authorized head months. These projects will benefit both the permittees and the public by improving the perception of cattle grazing on the forest, which comes with a healthier rangeland. As a result aquatic and terrestrial wildlife will benefit from additional water sources, improved spring and riparian habitat and overall improvements to ecological functions and conditions. Thirteen projects are proposed in sage grouse habitat. These projects include burying of a storage water tank, burying of pipeline, new ponds and protection of springs.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If these projects are not completed isolated issues will continue to degrade resources. The proposed projects will encourage proper cattle distribution and will potentially reduce trailing, herding and other costly management practices. Habitat will continue to be degraded in these critical areas. Areas of heavy livestock concentration are often the first area infested with undesirable weedy plant species including cheatgrass. If the current conditions are not changed they pose a threat of being weed sources to spread throughout the allotments. The currently unprotected spring sources are being trampled by livestock and wildlife. There is a potential that the spring itself and the surrounding habitat could be inhibited if not protected.
Relation To Management Plan:
The proposed action is in conformance with the Forest Land Management Plan FLMP (1986) for the Ashley National Forest. The FLMP and Grazing Handbook states that the "priority for new range structural improvements will be to developed water sources where there are no available sources within one mile". Design for developments will allow for use by game animals and birds (IV-32 Standards and Guidelines). While focused on additional livestock water, this proposal also provides water to wildlife in areas lacking (see UDWR Mule Deer Management Plan pgs. 8-9 and the UDWR Elk Management Plan pgs. 4-5). Some of the projects will be placed in priority sage grouse habitat. Both the State of Utah and Uintah County Resource Management Plans support the maintenance of grazing programs on federal lands by developing infrastructure, improving habitat and forage and by protecting sensitive riparian areas. The county plan under 20.4.6 objectives specifically states to "use guzzlers, reservoirs, and wells to attract livestock and wildlife away from riparian areas, which can help decrease soil disturbance and impacts to aquatic resources."
Fire / Fuels:
Improvements such as ponds and troughs will make water available for drafting during suppression activities in the case of a wildfire.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Most of the Ashley National Forest is located within a Municipal Watershed. By more evenly distributing cattle critical habitat and riparian areas will have less disturbance from livestock and as a result will increase water quality and quantity. The adding new troughs and ponds the project will increase water quantity, benefiting livestock and wildlife. As part of this project, grazing practices are been adapted by changing the grazing rotation and improving range management techniques and tools. Existing water systems have become a priority for maintenance and/or reconstruction to ensure protection of resources. UGIP grants are and will be pursued by permittees for additional funding to construct new projects and reconstruct current systems. As the projects are implemented, grazing will continue to be adapted to maintain proper use, thus directly improving the overall water quality and quantity long term.
Compliance:
The Ashley National Forest initiated the NEPA process in January 2020. The proposed projects will be analyzed for resource concerns or issues including impacts to heritage resources, timber resources, endangered, threatened or sensitive plants and animals, recreation conflicts, etc.
Methods:
Construction activities include: approximately 7.2 miles of fence, 24 miles of pipeline, 35 troughs, 2 storage tanks, 2 cattleguards, 9 ponds and 5 spring developments. Heavy equipment will be used to rip and bury the pipe, clear fence lines, bury storage tanks, dig ponds and place troughs. The Forest Service and grazing permittees will be responsible for construction in consultation with the Utah Grazing Improvement Program coordinators. It is anticipated that projects will be installed over a 3-10 year period as funds allow. All disturbed areas will be seeded with a desirable and competitive mix of grass, forb and shrub species.
Monitoring:
The Ashley National Forest has numerous photo points established within and around the proposed project and will add additional photo points in order to monitor the effects of the new projects. Utilization monitoring will continue to be monitored to determine improvements in cattle distribution. Monitoring photos and data will be recorded on the WRI database completion report as well as stored at the Ashley National Forest. Several DWR range trend studies will also be used to determine long-term improvements. If UGIP grants are used for construction the state may also establish and/or track conditions related to these new range improvements.
Partners:
The Forest Service and the grazing permittees worked cooperatively to identify several projects that would enhance the management of livestock grazing on the allotments by improving cattle distribution and assist in managing the proper rotation of pastures allowing for recovery of vegetation after grazing. The following partners approve and have been a part of the planning and design of the proposed project. -Grazing permittees on the Ashley National Forest -Utah Grazing Improvement Program-Terrell Thayne -Utah State University-Eric Thacker
Future Management:
Monitoring will be used to determine the effects of the project and management will be adapted as needed. Current and future associated management actions include better salting, herding, and range improvement maintenance/reconstruction to further improve cattle distribution. If monitoring shows positive results, additional projects may be proposed throughout the forest.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
These projects will assist in keeping cattle on the forest for their full permitted season and help to maintain the sustainability of cattle grazing on the forest especially during drought years. Forage utilization will become more uniform as cattle are properly distributed. The improvements will improve the aesthetics of the forest by modifying improper or nonfunctional range improvements by burying pipelines and storage tanks moving troughs away from springs, etc. These changes will improve the experience for campers, hunters, bird watchers and the general public.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$27,440.00 $0.00 $27,440.00 $65,000.00 $92,440.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Archaeological Clearance Clearances for 686 acres. Most sites are small in area but it is anticipated that the numerous sites will increase the expected cost. $30/acre inventory $20,580 $10/acre travel $6,860 $27,440.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
NEPA NEPA planning and analysis and review. $0.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$27,440.00 $0.00 $27,440.00 $65,000.00 $92,440.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
UWRI-NEPA Fund $27,440.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
United States Forest Service (USFS) In-kind contribution is for Forest Service NEPA planning and analysis 2020-2021. $0.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Mountain Meadow
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Imperfect Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Project Comments
Comment 01/16/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
This comment has been deleted by author or admin.
Comment 01/16/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
Tory, You are looking at the wrong project. I submitted two. See the one titled Uinta Mountain Meadow #5257.
Comment 01/16/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Tory Mathis
You are correct. My apologies. I deleted the previous comment. However, I don't recall having had any role in planning or design of this project. I don't think it's appropriate to list me as a partner in it.
Comment 01/24/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
Ok I removed you from the list.
Comment 01/24/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Randall Thacker
Since this is primarily a livestock management project, what will the livestock permittee be contributing to this project?
Comment 01/24/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Garry Brown
Randall, There is not much the permittee can do for this part of the planning (cultural) but the permittees are responsible for the construction either with a 50/50 cost share with the Forest Service or the permittee will apply for a UGIP grant which will pay for 75% of the project and the permittee pays the remaining.
Comment 02/04/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
Seeding of disturbed areas is listed in the methods, but no seed mix is attached to the project.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
882 Pipeline Construction Below surface
883 Fence Construction Barbed wire
884 Pipeline Construction Below surface
886 Pipeline Construction Below surface
894 Fence Construction Barbed wire
895 Fence Construction Barbed wire
2134 Other point feature
2136 Other point feature
2143 Other point feature
Project Map
Project Map