Freeport Drain Wetlands-Engineering Phase & Water Quality Monitoring
Project ID: 5353
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: 1396
Project Manager: Mike Kolendrianos
PM Agency: The Nature Conservancy
PM Office: Utah Field Office
Lead: The Nature Conservancy
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
This project will complete the Engineering required to create new 40 acres of new emergent marsh and open water habitats and maintain and restore natural wetlands that are historically associated with the Great Salt Lake fresh water zones on State of Utah Sovereign Lands. Water Quality Monitoring will provided before and after data to achieve the best picture of how the completed project has effective water quality entering the Great Salt Lake ecosystem.
Location:
The site is located entirely within Section 26 - Township 4 North - Range 2 West. A central location of on the subject property parcel has the Latitude/Longitude coordinates of 41 degrees 03' 04" North by 112 degrees 01' 56" West. The project location is on the southwestern edge of the City of Layton. The nearest major paved roadway intersection to the project site is Gentile Street and 3200 West,, which is approximately 3/4 of a mile to the northeast of the project site..
Project Need
Need For Project:
With the completion of the engineering phase and, having construction ready project to address the urban development grow of future storm water quality and quantity issues. Increased flows are anticipated, and concerns have already arisen, on how to best deal with the treatment and disbursement of this water in a beneficial and economical manner. The end goal of the project will create treatment wetlands that will treat storm water runoff essentially for free, after the initial cost to construct the project. This project will provide improvement in water quality for the local area and the larger Great Salt Lake ecosystem. Another important need is to maintain and restore natural wetlands that historically were associated with the Great Salt Lake freshwater zones. Due to the significant urban development along the eastern lake shore of the Great Salt Lake which has disrupted natural drainage patterns, the wetlands in this area have become completely dependent on irrigation return flows and/or storm-water runoff. As agricultural practices diminish in the area due to urban development, storm water flows will provide a much larger portion of the water that will support these historical wetlands. This project will help The Nature Conservancy to provide stormwater and subsequent vital irrigation to restore or enhance lost or degraded wetlands that are so important to the health of the local ecosystem. Water quality monitoring will provided before and after data to achieve the best picture of how the completed project has effective water quality entering the Great Salt Lake ecosystem.
Objectives:
The objective is to complete the engineering which includes if needed: topographical surveying, design, prepare plans and documents, wetland delineation, bidding support, Section 106 / Cultural Clearance and any permits application and management. Once the engineering is completed this project will be construction ready for the creation approximately 40 acres of new emergent marsh and open water habitats on the Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve and restore and protection natural wetlands that are historically associated with the Great Salt Lake fresh water zones on State of Utah Sovereign Lands. The goal of the Water quality monitoring data will provide information on the performance of wetlands in improving water quality of entering the Great Salt Lake.
Threats / Risks:
As the Wasatch front continues to grow storm water is an increasing problem. With these storm flows debris, garbage, sediment and nutrients are becoming and increasing problem. Along with increased storm flow we are losing water that was originally excess flow from agricultural irrigation. This has caused a decrease in the function of wetlands along the Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve as well as State Sovereign Land. Flash flows also increase the spread of phragmites by sheetflowing across areas with little to no ability to manage the water or water depth. This project will also help us to reduce the impact of storm water on adjacent wetlands as well as manage storm water flows. We will then be able to also retain it for future use downstream in newly created wetlands. By reducing sediment we also mitigate the effects of deposition in wetlands that reduces their function. Being able to mitigate flows will help with the spread of phragmites by maintaining deeper water levels and allowing higher flows to pass into managed wetlands or downstream without spreading across drier upland areas. These issues will only continue to grow and get worse unless steps are put in place. We have already completed several like projects with our partners with great success.
Relation To Management Plan:
This project falls within The Nature Conservancy's long-term management plan for the Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve. This also meets objectives in the Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) such as: Other Ecosystem Modifications Objective #2 for Other Ecosystem Modifications Land management agencies and agents develop vegetation management projects that avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts to species and habitats identified as vulnerable to these threats such as brush eradication. Habitat modification and loss is being mitigated by perennial plantings, food plots and shrub rows. Objective #1 for Sediment Transport Imbalance Opportunities are found and taken, to modify or remove reservoir infrastructure, or modify outflow management, to simulate or return natural sediment transport. The continual build-up of sediments in GSL wetlands is a major problem that can lead to decreased open water areas, shallower water depths that do not maximize the production of submerged aquatic vegetation, and promotes invasive plant species. The WMA's management relies on water control structures that can be used to help pass through unwanted sediments and maintain a highly diverse and functional wetland. Objective #1 for Droughts Terrestrial SGCNs and key habitats persist on the landscape, despite increasing drought conditions. Drought condition over that past several years has reduced the resilience of highly functional upland habitats. In order to maintain, and rehabilitate these upland habitats, renovation and reseeding is necessary in order to minimize the impacts of drought. Actions that this project will address include; 2.3.14 Conduct upland vegetation treatments to restore characteristic upland vegetation, and reduce uncharacteristic fuel types and loadings. 3.3.1 Develop list of priority reintroduction species and locations Objective #2 for Droughts Aquatic SGCNs and key habitats persist on the landscape, despite increasing drought conditions. Drought conditions over the past several years has made it imperative that the WMA's have properly functioning water control structures to maximize water deliveries in order to maintain key wetland habitats. Actions that this project will address include; 2.3.6 Restore aquatic habitat complexity 2.3.15 Conduct riparian vegetation treatments to restore characteristic riparian vegetation, and reduce uncharacteristic fuel types and loadings.
Fire / Fuels:
The purpose of this project is not specifically tied to fire or fuels reduction it will directly impact out long-term management which will help us manage buildup of fuel loads, mainly with regards to phragmites control. Currently we have little to no control of the water from the freeport drain. Flows in recent years have become larger with storm events and have increased dramatically due to increased urban runoff. The project will help us control those flashy storm flows and distribute the water more evenly or periodically terminate flows to different areas to help us maintain habitat. These uncontrolled flows cause areas to flood increasing the footprint of Phragmites. The project will enable us to manage the presence or emergence of Phragmites stands by either flooding or drying. This will help in the removal and treatment of this plant thus reducing fuel load. We have had several lightening caused wildfires and one man made in the arear in past years. They were in existing Phragmites stands we cannot control water depth and flow and treat effectively. These fires could be become a major issue with the increased urban development and North Davis Corridor Highway on our boundaries. Water Control is key for management of Phragmites.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Once the project is completed, the benefits to water quality will be realized through removal of large and small-scale particulate matter that has been incorporated into the stormwater. There are four categories of materials that will be removed from the water by the project: 1) Large low density floating trash, such as (paper, plastic miscellaneous garbage) will be remove. It is estimated to be 14.25 tons annually. 2) Coarse high density sediment (sand and gravel) will be sorted and settled automatically in the pre-treatment structure with the use of a deep settling basin. Material will fall to the bottom of the sump and remain trapped until removal by a track hoe and dump truck. The amount of course sediment estimated to be removed by the project is approximately is 390 cubic yards annually. 3) Fine sediment (colloidal material) and organic matter (Vegetation/ Grass Clippings / Animal Feces etc.) will generally not be retained by the pre-treatment structure and will flow into the existing or constructed wetlands where it will settle to the bottom of the constructed ponds or be filtered by the standing wetland vegetation.The fine sediment will mostly remain in the wetland cells where it will accumulate over time until it can be excavated by heavy equipment. The amount of fine sediment and organic matter estimated to be removed by the project is approximately is 200 cubic yards annually. 4) Dissolved particulates and chemicals are substances that are dissolved and dispersed in the water column that cannot be removed by screening or settling and must be removed by mechanical or biological methods. The project will provide biological methods that utilize vegetative filtering and phyto-remediation action that will allow for dissolved particulates to be removed through natural processes over time. Substances of concern that can be removed by the natural filtering and phyto-remediation process of wetlands are: Heavy Metals (Copper, Chromium, Lead, Mercury etc...) Hydrocarbons (Motor Oil, Hydraulic Fluid, Gasoline, Diesel etc...) Fertilizers and Pesticides. Many of these substances are filtered and absorbed by the wetlands as a natural process of absorption and the wetland cells will moderate the quantity and quality of the storm water to reduce dissolved particulates and chemical impurities in the range of 9 - 880 Pounds per Acre per Year depending on the ambient temperature, density of wetlands, type of wetland and infiltration vegetation species. For this location and type of wetland complex an average of 125 Pounds per Acre per Year is estimated. For this project of 48.50 acres this will equate to an estimated removal of approximately 6,063 pounds per year or 3 tons annually. .
Compliance:
This project will comply with all Army Corps regulations and Archaeological clearance as well as appropriate stream alteration permits and any other permits required.
Methods:
The goal is to have Equinox Engineering under contract by May 1, 2021, and the Engineering Phase completed by June 30, 2021. We have completed an initial engineering cost estimate, TNC has a number of private donors interested in funding the project, once funds are available the construction phase of the project will be put out to bid and appropriate contractor selected. TNC along with our engineer will oversee any construction conducted and ensure it is within the project specifications. All equipment and labor will be provided by the contractor. Water quality monitoring protocol will be prepared by TNC staff, Davis County Health Department, and retired USGS Utah Hydrologist.
Monitoring:
Vegetation monitoring will be conducted by TNC staff utilizing photo-points as well as bird surveys conducted by the Utah Wild Project every two weeks throughout the year and bat surveys in conjunction with Utah DWR conducted by TNC volunteer. Easement monitoring will be conducted by Utah Department of Agriculture. All monitoring and surveys will be conducted for a minimum period of three years after completion of the project. Water Quality monitoring and reports will be conducted by TNC staff and volunteers All reports/photos will be available to WRI.
Partners:
Every effort has been made to keep all partners informed and engaged during the planning, design and implementation processes of the Freeport Drain Wetlands Project. Partners on the project will include: Wild Utah Project, Janice Gardner Utah Reclamation, Mitigation and Conservation Commission, Mark Holden UDOT, Randy Jefferies Equinox Engineering, Chris Christiansen also has provide in-kind donation to this project. Utah Wetlands Foundation, Maunsel Pierce also has provided funded for the engineering of this project. Half Circle Cross Ranch: Colby Pace, Owner. KO Ranch: Kipp O'Brien, Owner. Layton City: Engineer Department. Kody Wallace, TNC Bat Volunteer Surveyor Davis County Commissioner Randy Elliott. The Utah Department of Agriculture: Roberta Valdez, Program Manager Conservation Easement DWR Farmington Bay, Jason Jones Davis Count6y Health Department Ed Parker Retired USGS Utah Hydrologist Sue Thiros
Future Management:
The Freeport Drain is part of the larger Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve owned and operated by The Nature Conservancy. The area managed encompasses approximately 4,654 acres. These areas have endowments in place for future management as well as TNC staff, whose time is dedicated for management of these preserves. TNC are wholly invested in the project areas and will continue with the long-term management. This area will be managed in accordance with the existing management plan for The Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The Freeport Drain and associated landscapes are currently used for a variety of activites. Currently TNC utilizes a winter grazing program. This program helps to reduce fuel loads on the preserve as well as help with invasive species. With the implementation of this project we will be able to better distribute water across the landscape for wildlife habitat. This project will also help us to irrigate more effectively. With this increased irrigation we can produce more cover for nesting birds during the breading season and increased forage for cattle during the winter months. This project will also help the surrounding wetlands were we allow waterfowl hunting by creating more opportunity for hunters. TNC also conducts an education program adjacent to the Freeport Drain at our visitor center during the fall/spring school time. This program is used to teach fourth grade students the importance of wetlands and the Great Salt Lake. This project will enhance visitor experience by creating additional wetlands around the visitor center and can also be used as a site for further education activities. The visitor center is currently open to the general public 365 days a year.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$39,000.00 $0.00 $39,000.00 $21,530.00 $60,530.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Engineering, Clearance Permits Service $30,000.00 $0.00 $7,000.00 2021
Other Volunteer - Water Monitoring $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 2021
Personal Services (permanent employee) TNC Staff Salaries/Fringe/ICR $0.00 $0.00 $13,530.00 2021
Materials and Supplies Water Monitoring Supplies $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$39,000.00 $0.00 $39,000.00 $21,530.00 $60,530.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Habitat Council Account $39,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) $0.00 $0.00 $21,530.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
American Bittern N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
American White Pelican N4
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Burrowing Owl N4
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Burrowing Owl N4
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Burrowing Owl N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Caspian Tern N4
Threat Impact
Diking / Pumping (Specific to Great Salt Lake) High
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Feral Domesticated Animals Low
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Industrial and Military Effluents Low
Little Brown Myotis N3
Threat Impact
Roads and Railroads Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Peregrine Falcon N4
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Medium
Peregrine Falcon N4
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Low
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (Direct, Intentional) Medium
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Sandhill Crane R4
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Snowy Plover N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding High
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Inadequate Understanding of Distribution or Range NA
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Feral Domesticated Animals Low
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Spills and Production Water Low
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Wading Birds
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Waterfowl
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Medium
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Droughts High
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
White-faced Ibis N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
American Crow R5
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
American Crow R5
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
American Coot R5
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Household Sewage and Urban Wastewater Low
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Canada Goose R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Cinnamon Teal R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Household Sewage and Urban Wastewater Low
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Gadwall R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Household Sewage and Urban Wastewater Low
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Redhead R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Household Sewage and Urban Wastewater Low
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Swan Species R3
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Swan Species R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Swan Species R3
Threat Impact
Household Sewage and Urban Wastewater Low
Swan Species R3
Threat Impact
Industrial and military effluents Low
Swan Species R3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Habitats
Habitat
Emergent
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Medium
Emergent
Threat Impact
Agricultural Pollution Low
Emergent
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) Medium
Emergent
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Emergent
Threat Impact
Heavy Metal Deposition Unknown
Emergent
Threat Impact
Household Sewage and Urban Wastewater Low
Emergent
Threat Impact
Presence of Diversions Low
Emergent
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Low
Open Water
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Open Water
Threat Impact
Commercial and Industrial Areas Low
Open Water
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Open Water
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Open Water
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Open Water
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Open Water
Threat Impact
Spills and Production Water Low
Open Water
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Unknown
Project Comments
Comment 02/06/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
There is a seed mix file uploaded to the database, but there is no mix associated with it. Did this project need seed?
Comment 02/08/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Mike Kolendrianos
Kevin, I removed the seed mix from the proposal, we have the seed for the project.
Comment 02/10/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
Sounds good. Even if you are not purchasing seed from the GBRC I would recommend you upload the final seed mix/invoice onto the database with the completion report for record keeping purposes. Thanks.
Comment 01/29/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Brunson
Can you upload some pictures of the project area? Will the public be able to hunt this area for waterfowl?
Comment 02/04/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Mike Kolendrianos
Yes, I'll get some photos of the area uploaded. Hunting: 2690 acres of the 4654 acres of the Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve is enrolled in DWR Hunters Walk-In-Access Program, also giving access to State Sovereign Lands. The area where the water control structures and the open water wetlands is within our Safety Zone/Rest Area. The area west of the Freeport Drain and where the drain enters State Lands is open to hunting. I'll upload the GSLSP hunting map with the photos.
Comment 02/10/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Mike Kolendrianos
I've added photos of the project
Comment 02/05/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Adam Brewerton
Just an edit for the species list, townsend's big eared bats probably don't occur here. Little brown myotis does, also big brown bat, long legged myotis, and brazilian free-tailed bats.
Comment 02/07/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Mike Kolendrianos
According to our Bat volunteer, she has recorded the Townsend Big Eared Bat on the Preserve, and she also mention that the TBE Bat has been netted on Antelope Island.
Comment 02/08/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Adam Brewerton
Mike, Thanks I have had them across the bay on Antelope, but didn't expect them on that side. I hadn't realized Kody had acoustic recordings on the other side.
Comment 08/18/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Please give some more details in the Completion Form about this project so anyone reading the report can understand the who, what, when, why, how, etc. of the project without needing to read the entire proposal. I also need you to fix a couple things on the Finance page. You have listed a bunch of in-kind in the budget section but that is not represented in the funding section. Please add the necessary funding line items to show where that in-kind is coming from. Once you have done that you will need to go to the Expense section and enter the final in-kind provided from those sources. When you have completed that, please go back to the Completion Form and finalize your report again so I know that it has been completed. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
04/28/2021
End Date:
06/30/2021
FY Implemented:
2021
Final Methods:
The Nature Conservancy contracted with Equinox Engineering to complete the engineering and design of the Freeport Drain Wetlands Project, Equinox services deliverables included, but not limited to, the topographical survey, creation of a Digital Terrain Model, hydraulic analysis of the site water delivery infrastructure, design and construction drawings and technical specifications, bidding support, Wetland Delineation Report, ACOE permitting application and management in accordance with United State Army Corp of Engineers requirements. All work was conducted in compliance with industry-standard practices, and completed in June 2021. The Nature Conservancy contracted with Certus Environmental Solutions, to complete the Cultural Survey/Clearance in accordance for the Freeport Drain Wetlands Project. Certus services deliverables included, but not limited to draft and final technical reports for the cultural survey/clearance in accordance with Utah Code Annotated 9-8-404 for the consideration of cultural resources in the project planning and implementation due to the involvement a grant from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. All work was conducted in compliance with industry-standard practices, DWR guidance, SHPO requirements, and completed in June 2021. Water Quality Monitoring supplies were purchased and delivered from Frontier Precision, the supplies include the Aqua Troll 600 Multiparameter Sonde, USGS staff contributed in selection the supplies for the project. USGS and UGS staff will assisted in the installation and data collection of the data. With completions of the WRI Project ID: 5353 Freeport Drain Wetlands, Engineering Phase & Water Quality Monitoring: This Project is now shovel ready.
Project Narrative:
The funding allowed the contracting for the completion of the engineering/design, cultural survey/clearance requirements to create new 40 acres of new emergent marsh and open water habitats and to maintain and protect the natural wetlands that are historically associated with the Great Salt Lake fresh water zones of State of Utah Sovereign Lands. The funding also allowed the purchase of the water quality monitoring supplies which will provided before and after data to achieve the best picture of how the completed project has effective water quality entering the Great Salt Lake ecosystem.
Future Management:
With the completion of the engineering/design, cultural survey/clearance and the purchase of water monitoring supplies, The Nature Conservancy is currently fund raising for the construction of the Freeport Drain Wetlands Project, TNC anticipated to bid the project the fall of 2021 with construction in 2022. Once the construction is completed TNC staff manage the project area according to TNC Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve management plan, which also meets Utah Wildlife Action Plan. USGS and UGS staff will assisted in the installation and data collection of the water monitoring supplies.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
10408 Affected Area
Project Map
Project Map