Shurtz Canyon Habitat Enhancement and Wildfire Protection
Project ID: 5629
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2022
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Nickolas Howell
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
To reduce and maintain hazardous fuels to limit destructive wildfire impacts to the communities of Cedar Highlands, Kolob Terrace and to the smaller communities located in the Shurtz Canyon area of Iron County, Utah. This estimated 3,500 acre phase 1 of the project will be conducted using masticators (Bullhog). The overall draft NEPA includes multiple years and multiple phases of treatments using a variety of mechanical tools for other project phases.
Location:
South and east of Cedar City, Utah in Iron County. This project encompasses a portion of Escalante Desert HUC (#16030006), within the Shurtz Creek-Quichapa Lake Watershed and surrounds the communities of Cedar Highlands, Kolob Terrace and Kanarraville.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The purpose of the BLM proposed project is to reduce and maintain hazardous fuels to limit destructive wildfire impacts to the communities of Cedar Highlands, Kolob Terrace and to the smaller communities located in the Shurtz Canyon area of Iron County, Utah. The need is due to these communities being amongst the highest wildfire risk within Color Country District's management area as defined by the state of Utah's Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal data. The project site is dominated by stands of pinyon and juniper trees with a high percentage of young trees encroaching areas of remaining sagebrush, mountain brush and other deciduous shrubs causing a downward trend in herbaceous cover. The project area serves as an important winter and transition range for mule deer. This proposed project will improve wildlife habitat, increase ecosystem resiliency to natural disturbance, improve watershed conditions and water quality, improve the health of both woodlands and sagebrush/grasslands by increasing biological diversity in age class and/or structure and will enhance habitat conditions for wildlife species, including mule deer. This area is identified as crucial and substantial mule deer winter range that has been severely reduced by human development especially with the construction of Interstate-15 and Highway-14. Hazardous fuels reduction would reduce encroaching pinyon-juniper and overgrown mountain brush to provide fire resistant, perennial grasses throughout the project area, decreasing the risk of catastrophic wildfire while providing wildlife habitat benefits through maintaining previous treatments. Enhanced protection to recreation interests, including existing and future bike trails and proposed and future campgrounds in the Cedar Highlands and Shurtz Canyon area over the next 10-15 years would also occur.
Objectives:
The primary objectives are to reduce all dead vegetation, a minimum of 90% of the pinyon and juniper overgrowth and 70% of overgrown mountain brush identified as hazardous fuels within the project area while while leaving islands of trees in a mosaic pattern for use by mule deer as thermal cover. Out of 7,133 acres of possible treatment acres (shown on map feature), some acres will likely not be treated after arch clearances and design features are finalized. The project is also designed to re-establish perennial grass, forbs and shrubs to as close to ESD percentages as possible to maintain a healthy landscape and limit wildfire destruction to the communities of Cedar Highlands, Kolob Terrace and to the smaller communities located in the Shurtz Canyon area of Iron County, Utah. Additional objectives include improving wildlife habitat and reducing soil erosion. This area contains crucial and substantial mule deer winter range that has been severely reduced by human development, especially with the construction of Interstate 15 and Highway 14.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The likelihood of catastrophic wildfire is much greater if the treatment is not conducted, increasing the threat and risk to communities and wildlife. The treatment area would experience significant erosion after a severe wildfire event and would threaten mule deer and overall wildlife habitat. Projects like this provide for greater landscape resiliency when future wildfires occur in previously treated areas, making a site more likely to recover on its own and lessening the chances of adverse burn site impacts. Fire return intervals would be more in balance with historic ranges. Proactively treating this area will provide multiple benefits including reduced hazardous fuel loads, reduced threat of a catastrophic wildfire and reduced threat to developed areas and infrastructure. Proactive action will also provide increased firefighter and public safety, while protecting natural resources wildlife habitat and surrounding public recreation improvements. Other challenges associated with not treating this area include more invasive species and conifer encroachment while increased public use and recreation continues. Recreation interests near Cedar Highlands and Shurtz Canyon is continuing to expand with the addition of mountain bike trails and the currently proposed Shurtz Canyon Campground. There is continued demand and plans to add more trails adjacent to these communities, which would continue to put pressure on mule deer at certain times of year, though many of trails will not be accessible during the winter months. This proposed treatment would effectively return identified areas to a fire regime closer to the historical range and desired future condition. The proposed treatment methods are intended to reduce overgrown vegetation and promote age class diversity. This greatly decreases the likelihood of future high intensity catastrophic fire and the subsequent infestation of invasive species. Seeding fire resistant grasses and forbs would also create lower wildfire intensity and would lessen the spread of future wildfires while reducing erosion in critical areas.
Relation To Management Plan:
The proposed action is subject to the Cedar Beaver Garfield Antimony Resource Management Plan (RMP), approved in 1986. This land use plan was amended in 2005 by Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management (UT-USO-04-01). The proposed action is consistent with federal, state and local laws, regulations, and plans to the maximum extent possible, including the following: - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 - Title 54 U.S.C. 306108 (Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act) - Best Management Practices for Raptors and Their Associated Habitats in Utah (IM: 2006-096) - Utah's Standards for Rangeland Health - Endangered Species Act 1973 - Migratory Bird Treaty Act 1918 - National Fire Plan (August 2000) - Secretarial Order 3372 (September 12, 2017) - Iron County Plan The proposed action is tiered to BLM's Final Programmatic Environmental Report (PER): Vegetation Treatments on BLM Lands in 17 Western States Programmatic Environmental Report, June 2007 and Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on Bureau of Land Management Lands in 17 Western States Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), June 2007.
Fire / Fuels:
The proposed project would benefit communities of Cedar Highlands, Shurtz Canyon and southern portions of Cedar City by reducing hazardous fuels. There are multiple private land parcels with structures scattered throughout the area, adjacent to BLM administered land. Reduction of overgrown vegetation is necessary to protect life, property and infrastructure adjacent to communities that are identified as extreme and very high wildfire risk. The project would also provide for firefighter safety and would allow aircraft a chance to be successful in the event of a wildfire. The 1,456 acre Hicks Creek Wildfire of October 2015 presented multiple fire suppression challenges to firefighters and would have likely impacted this proposed project area if it would have occurred during the summer months.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The proposal is not anticipated to impact the area with any contaminants. Use of equipment to conduct thinning could potentially create a release of fluids should a mechanical failure occur, but this is unlikely. This project would not be expected to negatively impact water resources. The project could improve the functionality of some of the surface water sources and may indirectly improve surface water quality in those areas. Herbaceous cover that will establish after the treatment will improve current erosion, soil loss and/or water infiltration conditions. Riparian and springs will also improve, providing more water.
Compliance:
NEPA is not yet approved for this project but is expected to be completed by Spring 2021. Final stages of the draft EA is currently in progress and is expected to be issued in February 2021.
Methods:
The project will include mechanical removal of an estimated 2,522 acres of vegetation using mastication (mechanical mulching) after aerial seeding occurs in the fall, before mechanical implementation. Aerial seeding will be conducted with a fixed wing or rotor wing aircraft. Both seeding and mechanical work will be contracted in coordination with interested partners.
Monitoring:
Monitoring of the project will occur to ensure objectives are met and ensure the treatment is maintained to ensure future community fire protection. Multiple treatments are expected to occur in the future and will be planned in conjunction with recreation interests. Monitoring would consist of nested frequency and photo points. Information would continue to be collected from existing BLM studies. Range monitoring is collected on each allotment on a periodic basis to monitor livestock and their associated impact. Monitoring data included both long-term studies and short term indicators. Long term monitoring would include nested frequency, cover and photo points to determine overall trend of the pasture.
Partners:
Partners include Cedar City Fire Department, Forestry Fire and State Lands, Division of Wildlife Resources, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, private land owners and the Cedar Highlands Community Fire Council. Formal community outreach meetings have been conducted with the Cedar Highlands HOA Board and members of the Shurtz Canyon Subdivision. Field tours have also occurred with the partners mentioned above. Some private land owners have expressed interest in reducing overgrown vegetation on their private property.
Future Management:
Treatments within this area would be periodically maintained to protect the investment and preserve wildlife habitat improvements. Maintenance may require additional hand or mechanical treatment of large shrubs and small trees or manual application of herbicides. Rangeland health assessments and long-term monitoring sites would be established to monitor the success of the treatment. Future recreation is also likely to occur in this area and will be designed to ensure the integrity of established fire mitigation objectives remain. The project occurs within the Hicks Creek, Hamilton Fort and Greens Lake allotments. All areas seeded will be rested for a minimum of two growing seasons to ensure adequate rest and seedling establishment.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The project area is located along a strip of land between Interstate 15 to the west, and mountains to the east. The proximity to the freeway and frontage road increases the likelihood of unwanted human caused wildfire ignitions, as does anticipated increased recreation use and development of private land. Reducing the fuel load would help to off-set the probable increase in potential fire ignitions from a growing human and future development planning perspective. This project is designed to improve and sustain nearby grazing allotments and will work in conjunction with them to expand quality winter habitat for mule deer. Rangeland conditions within the Hicks Creek, Hamilton Fort and Greens Lake allotments are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The forage quality and availability would greatly increase in the area after implementation of the project. Completion of this project would help distribute animal use over the area, which would reduce concentrated use in certain areas.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$1,584,636.00 $10,000.00 $1,594,636.00 $25,000.00 $1,619,636.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Personal Services (permanent employee) Cadastral Survey $0.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2022
Archaeological Clearance Cultural clearance for BLM administered lands @ $40/ac $14,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Seed (GBRC) Seed mix for BLM administered lands @ $xx/ac $170,636.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Mastication contract estimated at $380/acre. $1,330,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Primary aerial seeding contract (3,500 acres at $20/acre). $70,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Personal Services (permanent employee) NEPA, project layout, contract preparation and contract administration for mechanical mulching, aerial seeding and cultural clearance $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 2022
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$1,679,436.00 $20,000.00 $1,699,436.00 $50,000.00 $1,749,436.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM Fuels (Color Country) $1,000,000.00 $20,000.00 $50,000.00 2022
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (UWRI) $679,436.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Band-tailed Pigeon N4 R4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Black Bear
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Black-tailed Jackrabbit
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Bobcat
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Cougar
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Cabin Communities / Development Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Gray Fox
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Mountain Cottontail R2
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Mourning Dove R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Cabin Communities / Development Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Pinyon Jay N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Cabin Communities / Development Low
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Nickolas, Inappropriate fire frequency is a threat to pinyon jay, but not any more than complete removal of pj woodlands. Do you have any plans for pre-treatment surveys and means for avoiding loss of nesting habitat? Also, I am not convinced this project will benefit MSO - I know of none near the project area. I would also like to know how band-tailed pigeon will benefit from this project as "Oaks and large-seeded piƱon pines (Pinus edulis, P. monophylla) become increasingly abundant in inhabited uplands of s. Utah southward." Gray fox may benefit if shrublands are allowed to take over. Keith
Comment 01/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Nickolas Howell
You're correct. Keith. There is no MSO within this treatment footprint specifically. I removed MSO as we were working through the surveys in the draft EA at the time of entry. As for Pinjon Jay and band-tailed pigeons, we have surveys in place and will be working with wildlife biologists before implementation. Thank you for the great comments! -Nick
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Nick, This area could definitely use some thinning. Leave a few trees for shade while I am biking though, OK! A few comments and questions. 1) Is this area on an active grazing allotment? If not is it a grass bank or somewhere that may be grazed in the future? 2) You discuss the winter range benefits briefly in the project but do not list management plan objectives from the herd plans that this fulfills. 3) Similarly, you list many plans but not the objectives the project fulfills in your relationship to plans section. 4) What is the importance of Shurtz Creek for human or wildlife use as it is the major perennial water body draining the project area. 5) I would suggest that you add "Problematic Plant Species -- Native Upland" as a threat addressed to the Mountain sagebrush habitat type. 6) As Keith said you may want to work with your wildlife folks to validate the species of greatest conservation need benefitting from the project and how they benefit. 7) The project looks like it is a great partnership crossing multiple land management boundaries. You may ant to elaborate on this more in your proposal. 8) Wildlife monitoring? 9) You may want to revisit the costs of facilities at risk from wildfire in your sustainable uses section. This area is high use for recreation and your agency is putting a lot of work into the area and with the growth projection for Cedar this is likely to become a very high use area in the future. Mike
Comment 01/28/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Mike, I'll answer the livestock portion of your comments. This project is within the Greens Lake, Hamilton Fort and Hicks Creek allotments as discussed in Future management. I have updated the Sustainable uses portion to mention the allotments again so that the discussion of rangeland conditions makes more sense. Thanks!
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Also you list NEPA as not being completed until fall of 2021. I think generally UWRI would like to see NEPA completed by the time funding is awarded which would be May 2021.
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dan Fletcher
Mike, I will address this question. We plan on issuing the NEPA/DR in February 2021; therefore, the Decision should be final and the project will be ready to authorize by the May 2021 award funding deadline.
Comment 01/25/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
This looks like a great project.! I noticed in the project you will be treating tree's on both sides of the livestock trail. That livestock trail is extremely vital to the industry. Have you reached out to the president of the Cedar Livestock Association while working along the Right of Way? The livestock trail is a historic and functioning right of way. In the fall it is some where in the neighborhood that around 25,000 to 30,000 animals use that trail every fall. It is supposed to be fenced on both sides of the trail. During this project is there anyway to fix or improve some fences along that lane to help protect the project and maintain the historic functioning trail? Thanks !
Comment 01/28/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Erica Shotwell
Jake, As part of the NEPA process, consultation with interested groups regarding National Historic Trails that may be affected within the project area will be performed. Also, as part of pre-implementation, surveys that are conducted on projects include Cultural and for ROW (if they will be affected by the project). If it is deemed that avoidance must be done for the cultural site (such as National Historic Trail) then it may be determined that the site would be avoided. Although I did not find that the Cedar Livestock Association has a ROW with the BLM on the trail, Cedar Livestock Association can be involved as an interested party in the project to ensure that the project will not affect the trail use. If the trail is a designated National Historic Trail, then prior approval would need to be obtained to do fence maintenance, as the fence would then be considered part of the National Historic Trail. Fencing material could be supplied by CCFO for the BLM portion of the trail in order to ensure the protection of the treatment if the Livestock Association is willing to do the fence maintenance. Although if this is a ROW, then the ROW holder is responsible for facilities maintenance. I hope I covered everything, please give me a call if you have any questions. Thanks.
Comment 01/28/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
I am certain the livestock association would like to participate with the project and fencing along the livestock trail. Lets see what possibilities can be achieved. It is a prescriptive ROW you can reach out to me on e-mail I will give you contact information for the livestock association. Thanks !
Comment 02/09/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Nicki Frey
I will reiterate what Keith mentioned - I don't see anything in your proposal to explain how removing pinyons and junipers will benefit species that rely on conifers. If you could provide that information somewhere in the proposal that would be greatly appreciated by the person scoring the SGCN species. Also monitoring your SGCN species should also be addressed. Thanks
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
11194 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
11194 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
Project Map
Project Map