Baker Farm Erosion Control and Habitat Improvement Project
Project ID: 5691
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2022
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Kaden Potter
PM Agency: Utah Department of Agriculture and Food
PM Office: UGIP Northeast Region
Lead: Utah Association of Conservation Districts
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
This project will be utilizing BDA's along a seasonal drainage for erosion control and improvement of the water table for more diverse plant species and wildlife habitat within cropland. Buffer strips will be planted on both sides of the drainage which will include species that will benefit wildlife, improve grazing, and decrease erosion around the drainage. An additional seed mix will be used to benefit pollinators and this seed mix will be planted in the drainage.
Location:
This project will take place on Kent Baker's Farm in Petersboro, Utah. His farm is just north of Mendon, Utah and is on the northeast end of the Wellsville Mountain Range.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Due to farming up to the edge of the drainage in the past, removing all stabilizing vegetation has caused the channel to erode, down cut, and narrow. Continued erosion has been causing sediment loading of an irrigation pond and into Cutler reservoir. Sedimentation of the irrigation pond has cost the landowner $5,000 previously to dredge and continued degradation and erosion of the stream banks is causing a loss of field. The land owner is conservation minded and desires to improve his land in a environmental sound way. He has switched farming practices to a conservation agriculture based system using such practices as no-till and cover crops to build up the soil and improve the infiltration and reduce erosion from the field. This project will address the land owner's desire to restore the drainage and stop further erosion of the land and improve habitat along the drainage for vegetation and wildlife along with providing technical assistance and expertise management of the project.
Objectives:
* Hiring of an expert firm to design and implement the project. * Installation of BDA structures along the drainage in optimum locations. * Reduction of water velocity during seasonal flow to minimize erosion. * Increase water table to improve suitability for diverse wildlife friendly species. * Establishment as a demonstration and education site for promotion of conservation practices in cropland.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The drainage is experiencing an increased rate of erosion as it becomes more channelized, concentrating the flow energy and increasing its velocity. With extreme weather events causing larger seasonal flows further down cutting and channelizing will occur, increasing the difficulty of being able to use BDA type structures to restore the drainage. It is possible with a decade this channel could be so incised that such a project would become impossible and would require heavy equipment and significant funding to address the issue. Additionally the homestead's only source of domestic water is a spring located at the bottom of the drainage. The spring and its structures are at risk of extensive damage from seasonal high flows threatening the drinking water for the homestead.
Relation To Management Plan:
The Baker family has been working with the NRCS and Blacksmith Fork Conservation District to address resource concerns of the farms productivity due to decline crop plant vigor and sustainability of the land due to soil degradation and erosion. Plans have been implemented to meet the following objectives * Reduction of soil erosion through eliminating tillage and soil disturbance through no-till planting and planting of cover crops in the fallow period. BDAs will serve as the tool to address the soil erosion issues along the drainage system. * Increasing productivity and crop vigor through building up of soil organic matter and increasing soil infiltration and water holding capacity through use of cover crops and no-till practices. * Increasing cycling of nutrients through cover crops and integration of livestock grazing of cover crops. A permanent electric fence, livestock water pipeline and temporary electric division fences have been installed to facilitate proper grazing management and utilization of the cover crops. * Demonstration site for soil health practices and conservation efforts. The Baker Family is willing and has allowed the site to serve as demonstration and testing site and desires to continue to allow the farm to serve this purpose. Utilizing BDAs to address seasonal flow erosion on farm is nonexistent in the area and to be able to install such a project will not only address the resource issue but will provide a demonstration site to promote further adoption in the area where similar erosion issues are prevalent. The Middle Bear TMDL has identified agriculture as a contributing source of sediment and nutrient loading into Cutler Reservoir. Under Nonpoint Source 4.1.2, agriculture is listed as one of the major sources for the loading of sediment and nutrients due to such things as erosion from cultivated land and disturbed soils. These contributions have led to low dissolved oxygen and high levels of phosphorus. Under section 7.6, "Reasonable Assurances", the plan calls to rely on the use of Best Management Practices to attain reductions for agriculture and other land uses. The plan identifies the use of BMP's such as filter strips and combines with already implemented practices of no-till and perennial grasses on the cropland. Additionally, the beaver dam analog's serve as a BMP for the improvement of the drainage to support better stabilization of the streambank.
Fire / Fuels:
Once the BDA structures are installed, water will be slowed down and the water table will be raised which will create a beneficial riparian area with desirable plants and the drainage will hold more water. This riparian area will provide an excellent fire break and prevent possible fires from destroying habitat and cropland around the drainage.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The reduction of sediment loading due to decreasing the severity of stream bank erosion will directly impact the quality of water in the watershed. Slowing of the water will also allow for greater infiltration into the water table and increase groundwater recharge in the area over the long term increasing the quantity of water in the aquifer.
Compliance:
The Project site has been previously inventoried for cultural resources during previous NRCS EQIP projects. No cultural resources have been identified that would be at risk. Additionally the projects proposed treatment requires minimal disturbance and has a small foot print posing minimal risk. NRCS will be involved in the current project and the practices identified show a net positive or no impact on all Resource identified in previous CPA-52.
Methods:
The project calls for the installation of about 50 beaver dam analog structures constructed from materials sources onsite or locally, consisting of wood, sticks, and soil along with wood poles. The structures will be installed by a knowledgeable contractor that has expertise in such practices. The structures will be built using NRCS approved practice standards. The BDAs will be installed by hand using shovels and hand held post pounders. Wood materials will be sourced on and off site requiring the use of chainsaws to cut wood into desired lengths. Offsite materials will be hauled in using pickup truck and trailer.
Monitoring:
Monitoring plan will use remote monitoring tools, including field cameras at key installation sites along the drainage to monitor seasonal flow timing as performance of structures over time. At minimum, annual drone mapping of the drainage will be conducted to monitor erosion rates and changes to the drainage vegetation composition. Conservation district will report annually on the progress of the project in their newsletter and social media outlets. Field tours organized by the district will be used to promote the practice among landowners and other conservation districts and agencies.
Partners:
Partners include Blacksmith Fork Conservation District and UDAF has been providing technical assistance. The district will serve as lead for the project as well as facilitator for the demonstration aspect of the project. UDAF and the District has been working with the Baker Family since the initial NRCS application in 2016. NRCS has provided technical and financial assistance in implementing the soil health practices and grazing improvements. Additionally an application for EQIP assistance has been submitted to help with the cost of the BDA structures. Scott Shahverdian, with Anabranch Solutions, has been involved with the project since his conception in the winter of 2018. He contacted the UDAF Watershed Coordinator for the Bear River to discuss the landowner's potential solutions to the erosion issue. Scott is also serving as link to Utah State University and building the potential of using the site to educate students at USU interested in conservation. Division of Water Quality Nonpoint Source program has committed $5,500 to this project.
Future Management:
Continued involvement of Blacksmith Conservation District working with the Baker family will help to provide for longevity of the projects demonstration capability. Scott Shahverdian will continue with helping to monitor the structures effect and recommend improvements to continue restoration of drainage over time such as recommendations if BDAs need to be increased in height or additional structures are needed. The landowner is interested in also planting vegetation along the drainage as the habitat for perennial plant growth and building better habitat for wildlife.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
As the stream bank stabilizes and vegetation increases, this will provide more wildlife habitat and can serve as a wildlife corridor to the bordering forest land on the west side of the property as well as provide recreations for the landowner's family. The site can be a long term demonstration site that will provide a site that can be utilized to monitor and measure long-term effects of such practices for researchers.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$13,094.48 $6,100.00 $19,194.48 $2,000.00 $21,194.48
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Seed (not from GBRC) This seed mix will be used to plant 1.3 acres of the drainage system. The mix will include beneficial pollinator species and will attract not only pollinators, but many different species of wildlife. $139.65 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Seed (not from GBRC) This seed mix will be used to plant the 30 foot buffer strip on both sides of the drainage which is roughly 3.8 acres. This mix will help reduce runoff and erosion and will include species that will be very beneficial for wildlife and for grazing. $254.83 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Other Field days, tours, demonstration activities, outreach, and education services. $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2022
Contractual Services Designing, implementation, documentation, permit perpetration, acquiring materials, done by a hired, knowledgeable contractor. $12,700.00 $2,800.00 $0.00 2022
Materials and Supplies Wood poles, post pounder, and hand tools $0.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 2022
Equipment Purchase Monitoring equipment, including field cameras. $0.00 $600.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Hiring custom farming services to plant buffer strip and pollinator mix on 5.1 acres total $0.00 $200.00 $0.00 2022
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$13,094.48 $6,100.00 $19,194.48 $2,000.00 $21,194.48
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Utah's Watershed Restoration Initiative (UWRI) $13,094.48 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Utah Association of Conservation Districts (UACD) UCC Annual Project Funds provided to Blacksmith Fork Conservation District. $0.00 $600.00 $2,000.00 2022
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Non-point Source Funds already committed to the project $0.00 $5,500.00 $0.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Ring-necked Pheasant R3
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas High
Sharp-tailed Grouse N4 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Sharp-tailed Grouse N4 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Sharp-tailed Grouse N4 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Gray (Hungarian )Partridge R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Gray (Hungarian )Partridge R3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Habitats
Habitat
Open Water
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Open Water
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Relationship Between Groundwater and Surface Water NA
Project Comments
Comment 01/11/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Hill
This looks like a great project that has multiple funding sources and collaborators. This is a good conservation project that benefits the landowner and the public with its water savings, erosion control, and wildlife benefits. Your proposal could be strengthened by referencing more and other agencies management plans that deal with your resource concerns. For example see if the County has a resource management plan that talks about erosion, or Pacificorp might have a plan that talks about managing sediment loads in cutler reservoir, or DWR might have something for different species effected in this area for erosion or fishing or something. I would reach out to these other agencies and involve them especially DWR. Call the local biologist and see what information or help they can give you. Good Luck!!
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kaden Potter
Thank you for these suggestions. I will research more and see who else I can involve in this project. If you have any contacts that are involved in these agencies let me know. I have been working with and involving Michael Peyton who is a Wildlife Conservationist that works for Pheasants Forever. He has provided beneficial seed mixes that will benefit wildlife and help prevent erosion.
Comment 01/27/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Tony Richards
Clint The Cutler RMP does talk about sediment reduction projects inside the land owned by Pacifcorp, they include grazing management and fencing off shorelines along with vegetation enhancements, such as planting of 100' buffer between shoreline and croplands (see figure 4-2). We will follow NRCS specifications on buffer width but the concept will be similar to this RMP design. I was unable to find anything to discuss sediment from off the hillside and the area above the shoreline. The project falls outside of the RMP areas see map (figure 4-1). map and diagram are attached to the proejct application.
Comment 01/28/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Tony Richards
Sediment loading was referenced under the "Agricultural nonpoint sources" in the Middle Bear TMDL - Feb 2010. On page 133 (4.1.2.3). Those include cultivation methods, and overland flow, health of the riparian area the water flows through. BMPs are discussed including filter strips. We feel that this project touches on key areas of the TMDL, by addressing the cultivation of the land going to no-till and perennial grases, as well as increasing infiltration and reducing overland flow with the same practices. We will be installing BMPs with the filter strip that will be planted along the drainage edge. Lastly we are attempting to improve the health of the drainage to support better vegetation for stabilizing, decrease water velocity and erosion. In section 7.6 "Reasonable Assurances" it list BMPs on agriculture and other lands as the main approach for addressing sediment loading (page 214) Here is a link to the TMDL document. https://deq.utah.gov/legacy/programs/water-quality/watersheds/docs/2010/03Mar/BearRiverCutlerReservoirTMDLsFinalReportFeb2010.pdf
Comment 01/21/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
If you really think this project will keep nutrients and maybe sediment out of Cutler, then I would add Open Water as one of the habitats. Then look at the available threats and see which ones apply. Thanks, and good luck. I'm glad to see this proposal.
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kaden Potter
Open Water has been added to the Habitat list with associated threats of sediment transport imbalance and storms and flooding. Thank you for your suggestions and help.
Comment 01/21/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
I'm going to echo the comments Clint made. This is a valuable project but it is nearly a carbon copy of last years proposal that did not rank well. Reach out to DWR aquatics staff about strengthening this proposal or if they would include this in their region wide effort.
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kaden Potter
Thank you Nathan. Do you have any contact information I could use to contact someone in the DWR aquatics staff in the Logan area?
Comment 01/22/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Get in touch with Clint. clintbrunson@utah.gov
Comment 01/25/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kaden Potter
Thank you!
Comment 01/27/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Pj Abraham
Depending on duration of seasonal flow, it may be beneficial to include cottonwood and/or willow plantings as well in aid to stream bank stabilization and providing other plant species to increase the wildlife benefit. Has this been considered?
Comment 01/27/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Tony Richards
Pj - Thank you for the feedback. We plan on planting in stabilizing and wildlife friendly vegetation in phases as the water table changes with influence of the BDAs to compensate for the seasonal flow variation. In this first phase the revegetation is more of grases and quick estalbishing to stabilize the bank with the current lower water availability and provide for pollinator and upland bird habitat as the primary focus. Addtioanly the entire farmland has been planted in perenniall grases to help stabilize the entire field, help rebuild soil structure, organic matter content and reduce erosion from wind and water. The land owner will continue to work with the local conservation district and watershed coordinator and NRCS for technical assistance over coming years as the drainage continues to improve to meet the landowners goals to stabilize the drainage, provide improve wildlife habitat, which will likely include planting of species such as willow other species the will serve multiple purposes.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
10064 Affected Area
Project Map
Project Map