Parowan Front - Cottonwood Creek Phase 2 PJ Thinning
Project ID: 5783
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2022
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Dustin Schaible
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Phase 2 of this project will include thin/lop and scatter approximately 300 acres of pinyon and juniper within mule deer winter range habitat on BLM land.
Location:
The project is located approximately 8 miles northeast of Paragonah, UT.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Parowan Front area serves as an important winter range for mule deer on the Panguitch Lake WMU which has endured over-utilization of preferred browse species by high concentrations of mule deer due to the I-15 corridor limiting natural westward migratory movements. In addition, trees have encroached into areas of remaining sagebrush, bitterbrush, cliffrose and other deciduous shrubs causing a downward trend in herbaceous cover. Many areas of the remaining low elevation sagebrush ecosystems along the I-15 corridor have converted into an annual grass dominated system, which have been in competition with the desired but limited forbs and native perennial grasses. In the pinyon and juniper systems, densities have increased and competition between trees is strong. Tree stand densification has reduced available browse and forage, reducing carrying capacity. There is a need to reduce stand densities to improve stand health and improve age class diversity. There is a need to improve forage conditions for big game within pinyon and juniper areas. In a collaborative effort, UDWR and BLM have deployed radio collars on mule deer to provide insight on mule deer movement for identification of important habitats within limited winter and transitional range. This project will also assist in the evaluation of the immediate impacts to wintering mule deer in relation to habitat restoration efforts. The implementation of this project will provide a unique opportunity to acquire movement data associated with treatments prior to, during, and after implementation. In the first year of monitoring, collared mule deer utilized and highlighted the value of the low elevation grass-dominated areas which appear to be substantially higher in value in early spring when deer move from the hills down to the lower portions of the valley (see attached map). During this time, deer are transitioning from their winter diet of browse species and are in search of newly emerging vegetation. High numbers of mule deer are well documented closer to I-15 along the Parowan Front from March to May. Continued loss of these habitat types may contribute to deer migrating to summer range in poorer condition and experiencing lower fawning rates. Furthermore, the pinyon and juniper tree dominated areas along Cottonwood Creek do not provide much stop-over habitat value during migratory movements. This project aims to provide deer higher quality habitat on a limited winter and transitional ranges based on empirical data. This project will also improve elk habitat and promote expansion of sage grouse habitat in the Buckskin Valley area. This project will also consist of thinning to promote pinyon and juniper stand health in an effort to increase healthy pinyon jay habitat. Pinyon jays are commonly found on BLM lands surrounding Cottonwood Creek. Thinning will occur within approximately 300 acres of pinyon and juniper near an aspen stand on the west side of Buckskin Valley.
Objectives:
1) Restore low elevation sagebrush systems in a high mule deer density area on Parowan Front 2) Remove pinyon and juniper to improve health, vigor, and composition of riparian species by increasing water yield and retention. 3) Remove pinyon and juniper trees within a documented migratory corridor to create pockets of forage for mule deer. 4) Thin pinyon and juniper areas in the western portion of Buckskin and upper Cottonwood Creek to improve health of pinyon and juniper stands and improve forage conditions for mule deer transition habitat.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
The invasion of pinyon and juniper trees into areas once dominated by grasses, forbs, and shrubs has lowered the carrying capacity for wintering mule deer. Not completing this project we risk mule deer herds being forced to compete for browse and forage on an already crowded winter range, thus decreasing the carrying capacity of the winter and transition range even further. The increase of pinyon and juniper also increases the risk for catastrophic wildfires in these habitats, resulting in the complete or partial loss of current winter range and likely conversion to non-native (ie cheatgrass) systems detrimental to wildlife species (eg. threat to FEHA from non-native plant establishment). With increased tree densities pinyon and juniper habitat areas would burn as stand replacing events rather than low severity, low tree mortality events. Increased stand densities could also lead to reduced forest health as the risk of insect and disease increase. Pinyon and Juniper expansion has also resulted in loss of foraging areas for raptors such as Ferruginous hawk due to the continuous canopy. Opening up foraging spaces in this canopy while retaining clumps of trees with large flat-topped juniper for raptor perches and nesting is synchronous with the design feature of retaining patches of thermal and hiding cover for wintering big game. BLM/DWR will aggressively treat any noxious weeds within the treatment area.
Relation To Management Plan:
Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management plan (2019) Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. Panguitch lake Deer Herd Unit Mangement Plan (#28) 2015 The mid elevation upland site supports a pinyon-Utah juniper community and is generally considered to be in very poor condition for deer winter range. This community is prone to infilling from pinyon-juniper trees which can reduce understory shrub and herbaceous cover if not addressed. It is recommended that work to reduce the pinyon-juniper cover (e.g. bullhog, chaining, lop and scatter, etc.) should continue in this plant community. Parowan Front Wildfire management plan All of the units on the Parowan Front WMA have pinyon-juniper forests that are encroaching on the sagebrush sights and out competing many of the browse species important to wintering deer. Several thinning (lop and scatter) bullhog and chaining projects have been done in the past to remedy this problem. However, due to the extent of the encroachment an aggressive thinning policy needs to be carried out on the Parowan Front WMA to improve habitat for wintering deer. Southern Utah Support Area Fire Mangement Plan 2004 which states: Mechanicallly treat to convert pinyon and juniper invasion (condition class 3) into sagebrush/perennial grass (condition class 1 or 2) vegetation types. . Utah's Standards and Guidelines for Rangeland Health which address watersheds, ecological condition, water quality and habitat for special status species National Fire Plan (2000) Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 which state protecting forests, woodlands, shrub lands, and grasslands from unnaturally intensive and destructives fires Utah Wildlife conservation Strategy (2005) Iron County Deer Winter Range Resource Plan (2011) Protect and expand deer winter range and associated wildlife habitats. State of Utah Resource Management Plan (2018) The state supports the efforts of the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative and other rehabilitative efforts throughout the state The state supports the Watershed Restoration Initiative to encourage reduced wildfire acreage, reduced soil loss from erosion, reduced sedimentation and storage loss in reservoirs, and improved water quality. The state plan supports active management to improve and enhance riparian resources to provide for appropriate physical, biological and chemical function. engage with federal land management agencies to support active management of healthy riparian areas on federal land. Seeding an optimal mix of native and desirable non-native species to support desired ecologic conditions and create a properly functioning ecosystem. Actively remove pinyon-juniper encroachment in ecological sites due to its substantial consumption of water and its detrimental effect on sagebrush, other vegetation and wildlife. Use of the good neighbor program to partner with Federal Agencies to better manage forage. Iron County Resource Management Plan (2017) This plan supports our project in the following ways; Encouraging the BLM in managing rangelands "in a manner that will protect the quality of scientific, scenic, historical, ecological, environmental, air and atmospheric, water resource, and archeological values, while providing for outdoor recreation, food and habitat for fish, wildlife, and domestic animals. By stating that it supports management of rangelands and forestlands to enhance desired plant communities that benefit watersheds, wildlife, water quality, recreation, and sustainable livestock grazing. By encouraging multiple-use as custom and culture on current and future federal land projects. By encouraging protection of watershed from the threats of catastrophic wildfire through proper management of forests, and the reduction of fuel loads to prevent and minimize wildfires and their effects and whenever re-seeding needs to occure re-seeding with certified weed-free seed. By stating that riparian areas should be managed to protect vegetation characteristics. Conservation efforts include preserving existing riparian areas as well as restoring damaged ones. Preservation should also include the dedication of sufficient water and groundwater to support vegetation. By supporting range improvement projects in crucial deer winter ranges to sustain viable huntable populations, limiting off-road travel of vehicles in crucial deer winter ranges, and efforts to expand deer wintering ranges in the county.
Fire / Fuels:
The majority of the area is at moderate to extreme on the fire risk index. There is a large fuel load build up along the Parowan Front and an alteration in fuel types. Pinyon and juniper trees have expanded and moved into areas once dominated by shrubs, forbs, and grasses. Tree densities have increased within pinyon and juniper habitat types. The potential for more extreme fires will intensify as densities of pinion and juniper increase. By reducing stand densities the possibility for future larger-scale stand replacing fire events will be decreased. An extreme fire event could lead to a loss of crucial habitat/understory vegetation and the potential for a noxious weed infestation. Without this project, fuel conditions are such that a wildfire may be difficult to contain, leading to an increased risk to firefighter and public safety, suppression effectiveness and natural resource degradation. Fire Regime Condition Class within the project areas is predominately FRCC 3 which is where fire regimes have been extensiviely altered and risk of losing key ecosystem components from fire is high. Treatments identified within this proposal, including seeding with more fire resistant vegetation, would help reduce hazardous fuel loads, create fuel breaks, and reduce the overall threat of a catastrophic wildfire which could impact the communities of Paragonah and outlying residential properties and infrastructure. Treatments in and around the sagebrush areas would break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of wildfire entering these sensitive areas. Removing/thinning pinyon and juniper in a mosaic pattern would also break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of a high intensity wildfire. Because there is a greater risk of conversion of shrublands to annual grasslands under a high intensity fire, managed, pro-active treatments proposed would reduce the likelihood of cheatgrass invasion and help perennial grasses, forbs, and shrubs persist long-term.
Water Quality/Quantity:
In the lop and scatter process much of the bare soil will be covered by limbs and woody debris which will aid in the establishment of vegetative cover, which will reduce water runoff and decrease soil erosion into the Fremont Wash watershed. Implementation of this project will also greatly increase water infiltration into the soil, recharging groundwater systems in the area. Recent research Roundy, et. al.(2014) has shown that mechanical treatments to remove pinyon and juniper increase time that soil water is available. Even four years after treatment, treated areas showed from 8.6 days to 18 days additional water availability at high elevation sites. Additional research by Young, et. al. (2013) also showed a relationship between tree removal and soil climates and wet days on these sites, which while providing more available moisture for desired vegetation could also provide moisture for weeds. Numerous studies have shown that increased infiltration rates and less overland flow improve both water quality and quantity.
Compliance:
This project is in compliance with the Fremont Habitat Improvement Project Environmental Assessment (2016) and is in direct proximity to the Parowan Front Habitat Restoration Environmental Assessment (2018). Archaeological clearance will be completed prior to implementation.
Methods:
The lop and scatter consists of phase 2 and phase 3 stands of pinyon and juniper. The project area (approximately 300 acres within within the polygon on the map) will be thinned to approximately 15-25% of maximum stand density. This will create an open stand with spacing between trees of approximately 20-40 feet between trees depending on size class (Page, 2008) Spacing range is variable, that is, two or more trees can be left in clumps to meet desired cover or other wildlife attributes, however, the target trees per acre target shall not be materially increased. Species preference will be to retain pinyon over juniper and to retain trees of best form (crown). Stump heights will not exceed 6 inches. Slash height will be lopped as to not exceed 24 inches.
Monitoring:
Radio telemetry data from wintering mule deer will be used in the evaluation of this project. The data will also be used to identify future treatments that may provide valuable stopover habitat during migratory movements. PFC will also continue to be conducted on the perennial streams within and adjacent to the project area. Monitoring for stands within the pinyon and juniper thin/lop and scatter polygon will include a walk-through as well as established plots on a five-by-five chain (330 ft.) grid during and following treatment to monitor compliance and to certify objectives for proper tree selection, spacing, stump, and slash heights. Percent quality will be recorded on inspection forms and can be loaded into the reporting section of the WRI data base upon completion. In addition, this site will be monitored on 5 - 10 year intervals using stand exams and walk thru exams to determine stand densities and stand structure. When a determination is made that the existing tree cover has exceeded desired densities (>25% SDI) a re-treatment will become necessary. At such a time both trees that have in-filled along with trees retained from the first thinning may be removed to reach desired densities.
Partners:
BLM, Sportsmen groups, and UDWR have coordinated on this area multiple times due to the challenges presented by high densities of mule deer and the current habitat conditions. This area has been supported for treatment by all parties.
Future Management:
The project falls within the Fenton and Bone Hollow allotments. Future management will be based on range monitoring and take an adaptive management approach to meet rangeland health standards as well as wintering mule deer habitat requirements.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Rangeland conditions are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The health, vigor, recruitment and production of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs would improve which would provide a more palatable and nutritional source of forage for wildlife. These areas are used extensively for recreation by hunters and wildlife viewers. They are also popular areas for shed antler gathering. On BLM administered lands firewood gathering, and cedar post cutting is also permissible and is governed through a permit that can be purchased at the local BLM office.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$132,200.00 $0.00 $132,200.00 $15,000.00 $147,200.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Personal Services (permanent employee) project layout and design / arch clearance $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2022
Other cadastral survey $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2022
Contractual Services PJ Thinning/Lop and Scatter 661 acres @ $200/acre $132,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$156,403.48 $0.00 $156,403.48 $15,000.00 $171,403.48
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM (Forestry) $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 2022
BLM BIL - Fuels A099 Extension ASAP 1777 $156,403.48 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Ferruginous Hawk N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Sonoran Mountain Kingsnake N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Pinyon Jay N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Habitats
Habitat
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/15/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Dustin, You mention that the thining operation in W Buckskin is intended to improve the health of P/J woodlands for the benefit of pinyon jays. However, you do not mention if there will be any pretreatment monitoring (which should begin in March) or follow-up post treatment monitoring. It seems to me that doing so would be a nice compliment to the pinyon jay studies BLM plans to begin implementing this spring. Keith
Comment 01/15/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Hey Keith, Migratory bird nesting surveys are typically completed in May prior to treatment. We will plan to conduct PIJA specific surveys in this area in the next few months for the purpose of locating nesting colonies as this area may serve as a study site.
Comment 01/20/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jimi Gragg
Pinyon jay is available in the drop-down menu if you can make the case for benefits. Also - trigger warning for Mikey G - I think you can add mountain kingsnake. The Parowan Front is a great place to see them, they are pretty abundant there. They occur in most of the mid-elevation habitat types but, being obligate predators of small vertebrates, need a prety base. Small mammals, lizards, and ground-nesting birds like juncos are what they eat. More native herbaceous diversity & cover are the best way to provide a prey base. I've made this argument before here, probably better. Anyway - there you have it. Thanks for the proposal, you're absolutely right, this area sure needs the work.
Comment 02/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Thanks for the comments. I have added both species to the list and addressed them in the "need for project" section.
Comment 01/21/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kyle Christensen
Dustin, this looks like a great project and very beneficial project to wildlife and help the wintering mule deer.
Comment 02/04/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Dustin, Looks like a cool project. Your description says 300 acres but the methods indicate 300 and then another 200 maybe? You know I am easily confused. Just so you know the Cedar City Ranger District is likely looking at some treatments on the Forest around there in the future but they are still working through the NEPA process. We mentioned it to Shawn Peterson at a meeting a couple months ago. We also have a Riparian Level III Inventory just across the boundary on the Forest. Any collared grouse over there still? I am ignoring Jimi and his snakes. Mike
Comment 02/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Thanks Mike, I fixed the acreage in the project description...shooting for 300 acres. Also added in the pinyon jay and mountain kingsnake. I spoke with your new bio and looking forward to any future collaborative efforts with USFS in this country.
Comment 02/05/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Needed Project. Because it is phase II & III P/J is there a need for seed? I have seed a couple of L & P projects that added seed with some minor success.
Comment 02/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Thanks Scott. We are not looking to seed any of the project since it is a bit higher in elevation and the treatment will have little soil disturbance.
Comment 02/16/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
I think there is an error in the method section. You state the project will be seeded after mechanical treatment, but neither seeding or machinery other than L&S is mentioned anywhere else. Also, there does seem to be some discrepancy in the noted acreage of the project. I was also unsure of the overall plan for tree thinning. One part mentioned it would be in a mosaic, but the next paragraph states it will be thinned to 15-25% cover? Will there be untouched islands and mosaic and the thinned area will be at 15-25% cover? In the higher encroached area's were mechanical (e.g. bullhog or chain) considered instead of L&S?
Comment 02/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dustin Schaible
Kevin, thanks for catching that. I have updated the methods section so only lop and scatter to the appropriate specs will be used....no mechanical treatment or seeding for this project to promote a healthy stand of PJ that serves as winter cover for mule deer.
Comment 02/19/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
Have you reached out to the livestock producers to get some cost share farm bill money to help with finances of this project ?
Comment 04/28/2025 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
The BLM funding on this project expired on 3/31/2025 and will need a completion report submitted by June 30, 2025 for reporting to the BLM. Please updated the following: 1. Update the Funding section, but only the "Through Other" or "In-kind." WRI Admin team will update all expenses in the "Through DWR/WRI" column. 2. Update your map features (if applicable) and 3. fill out the completion form. 4. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. 5. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
06/03/2024
End Date:
03/26/2025
FY Implemented:
2025
Final Methods:
Thinning project (hand thinning/lop/scatter) was awarded to GE Forestry on Nov 10th, 2021. Contractor delayed operations until June of 2024. Contractor completed 150 acres and then left the site. The contractor failed to return. March 26, 2025, a letter was sent from the State of Utah, Department or Natural Resources informing the contractor of the termination of the contract. The contractor was given until May 1st, 2025, to invoice for acreage completed ($13,350.00). Contractor failed to invoice and thus lost claim to any payment. Work that was completed was excellent.
Project Narrative:
This project was for thinning of pinyon-juniper approximately 10 miles southeast of Beaver, Utah. Objective of thinning PJ was to improve stand health and understory vegetation for big game. Stands were thinned to a variable spacing of approximately 30 x 30 with larger (10 inch pinyon/14 inch juniper) overstory trees retained. By thinning, stand health was improved (decreased risk to insect/disease, stand replacing fire, increased production of nuts) and understory vegetation was also improved.
Future Management:
Area will not need to be rested from grazing. Grazing pressure is light but will be monitored as per current grazing management plan. Remaining units not treated will be treated under WRI# 7650.
Map Features
N/A
Project Map
N/A