2022 Cedar City and Kanab Field Offices BLM Maintenance
Project ID: 5888
Status: Pending Completed
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Burgess Munyer
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Previous project maintenance within the BLM Color Country District
Location:
Duncan Maintenance CCFO- 4452 acres Chipman Maintenance CCFO - 475 acres Benson CCFO - 407 acres South Canyon KFO - 806 acres
Project Need
Need For Project:
The existing treatment areas being proposed for maintenance are important for both livestock and many wildlife species, including wintering elk and deer, sage grouse, several sagebrush obligate birds, and pygmy rabbits. Eliminating the encroaching trees at this early phase ensures the following: 1. minimizes loss of herbaceous understory 2. protection/prolongment of the initial investment of a excess of a million dollars. 3. minimizes the cost of treatment: Phase 1 removal by hand now (~$50/ac=$250,000) vs phase II removal by mechanical later on(~300/ac=$1,500,000). No seed needed now ($0/ac) versus possible need for seed in some of the areas later on ($50/ac).
Objectives:
1. 98% removal of PJ trees within previously treated polygons.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Standards and Guides for Healthy Rangelands show that none of this area is meeting objectives for healthy rangelands (standard #3), and pinyon pine and juniper encroachment is a contributing factor. In addition, this entire area is in Fire Regime Condition Class 3, meaning more than one beneficial fire cycle has passed. Not improving vegetation in this area would result in conditions continuing to decline and the risk of losing key ecosystem components would remain High. Treating this area has its own inherent risks, including the potential for seeding failure, noxious weed outcrops and potential negative views from the public, due to opening up visibility near private residencies and roadways. Mitigation measures, such as ongoing noxious weed early detection/rapid response programs and outreach with private landowners will help mitigate these potential threats/risks.
Relation To Management Plan:
In addition to federal statutes and regulations [i.e. Taylor Grazing Act, Endangered species Act (ESA)], this project is in compliance and is supported by the following management plans and documents: Southwest Utah Support Area Fire Management Plan (2005) This action supports at least two objectives: Protection of critical deer habitat and watershed protection (page196); National Fire Plan (2000) This project meets several objectives of the NFP: Protection of Communities at Risk, which there are three listed communities affected, and increased safety of firefighters in the event of an incident.(Policies section) ; Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Statewide Management Plan for Mule Deer (2008) This project assists in meeting Habitat Objectives 1 & 2 and Recreation Objective 1 & 2; Pine Valley Deer Herd Unit Management Plan #30 (UDWR 2006) This project addresses a minimum of two limiting factors to multiple objectives, increase in winter range and highway mortality (see limiting factors) , Healthy Forest Restoration Act (2003), Iron county, Utah General Plan (1995), Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy (1995), Utah Wildlife conservation Strategy (2005), 3 individual allotment management plans (2009-2011) and the Cedar Beaver Garfield Antimony Land Use Plan Amendment (2004). For additional descriptions on how these plans support the Duncan Creek Project and other projects, see EA# UTO-CO12-2011-0011 (pg. 2-8).
Fire / Fuels:
As Pinyon and Juniper trees continue to encroach in these areas, live fuel loading and canopy cover will increase. This increase in live fuel loading and a closed canopy will increase the likelihood of an unwanted wildfire and its negative effects. Reducing the number of smaller diameter trees on the landscape now will in turn keep the live fuel loading and amount of canopy cover at a minimum for many years to come. This modification in vegetation allows initial attack firefighting crews more options to safely and effectively suppress unwanted wildfires and limits the negative effects. In addition to modifying fire behavior, treating the vegetation in these areas will result in multiple benefits, which include but are not limited to, improving and protecting current habitat for wildlife dependent upon these various ecosystems, maintaining native species diversity, preventing hazardous fuel accumulations and maintaining the dis-continuity of pinion/juniper that currently exists. This treatment will promote a fire resilient environment that reduces the risk for large scale, intense, unwanted wildland fires, with less risk to public and firefighter safety. Existing wildfire risk index in the project areas ranges from moderate-high to very low. Fire modeling results show an unwanted wildfire in these areas at the 97th percentile weather would quickly spread into high risk areas and threaten multiple watersheds, private lands and numerous other values such as structures, summer homes, culinary water systems, utility corridors, etc. The majority of the areas in this project are within fire regime III -- 35-100+ year frequency and mixed severity (less than 75% of the dominant overstory vegetation replaced); The Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) is estimated to be both moderate (FRCC 2) and high (FRCC 3) departure from the central tendency of the natural (historical) regime. The central tendency is a composite estimate of vegetation characteristics (species composition, structural stages, stand age, canopy closure, and mosaic pattern); fuel composition; fire frequency, severity, and pattern; and other associated natural disturbances. The majority of this project would be in FRCC 3. This project will improve the fire regime condition class to FRCC 1 and FRCC 2. This project will manipulate the vegetation in a manner that will modify fire behavior such that fire suppression personnel can safely initial attack unwanted wildfires in the area. These treatments will provide anchor points, safety zones, and buffer zones for values at risk such as powerlines, communities, range improvements. Instead of a crown fire that is wind driven with flame lengths of 30+ feet in Pinyon and Juniper requiring aerial resources to initial attach, this treatment will reduce the flame lengths to those that are easily managed with engines and hand crews.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The removal of pinyon and juniper trees will improve water quality by reducing TMDLs through the reduction in understory vegetation loss that would occur if pinyon and juniper trees past ecological thresholds into phase 2 and 3 stands.
Compliance:
2 PMArchaeology surveys were completed during the initial project. SHPO concurrence is necessary. NEPA is complete for all project areas included.
Methods:
Use contract crew to remove trees with loppers and chainsaws.
Monitoring:
Photos will be taken and a qualitative site condition assessment completed.
Partners:
N/A
Future Management:
The previous bullhog and chaining projects have been very successful in reestablishing desirable vegetative and habitat conditions. Removing encroaching pinyon and juniper will only further improve conditions within these ares. No additional or change in management is needed with this project.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The PJ treatments will increase available forage and prevent future loss of forage.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$355,840.00 $20,000.00 $375,840.00 $0.00 $375,840.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Duncan Maintenance (4,452 acres @ $50/ac ) $222,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Benson Phase III Lop and Scatter (407 acres @ $170/ac) $69,190.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services South Canyon Lop and Scatter (806 acres @ $50/ac) $40,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services Chipman Lop and Scatter (475 acres @ $50/ac) $23,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 2022
Personal Services (permanent employee) BLM Staff contract prep, layout, and administration $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$438,251.77 $20,000.00 $458,251.77 $96.62 $458,348.39
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $96.62 2024
BLM Fuels (Color Country) A088 Mod 8 - $107359 Mod 9 - $180000 $183,676.47 $20,000.00 $0.00 2023
BLM (Sage Grouse) A096 Mod 11 $25,567.53 $0.00 $0.00 2023
BLM Fuels (Color Country) A088 Mod 9 $190,575.30 $0.00 $0.00 2024
BLM (Sage Grouse) A096 Mod 11 - $14,432.47 Moved from 5907 - $24,000 $38,432.47 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Pygmy Rabbit N4
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Habitats
Habitat
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Project Comments
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Burgess, How long ago were these areas treated and at what growth stage are the trees you plan to remove? Keith
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Burgess Munyer
Hi Keith, I wasn't sure how to make this project not on the list for ranking this year because we're not asking for WRI funding. It's more of a mechanism for us to contract maintenance on some older projects. The projects date back as far as 2009, I think; and the trees slated for lop and scatter are saplings/whips.
Comment 02/09/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Tyler Thompson
The project doesn't need to be ranked but since it's going to be using the BLM/WRI good neighbor agreement to transfer funds to WRI so the BLM can use WRI's contracting, we'd like to see it presented as an informational item at the SR WRI meeting and have BLM do their best to respond to comments in the proposal and at the meeting.
Comment 02/09/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Brooks - Is this a project for this fiscal year (completed before June 30th) or for next fiscal year? I am just trying to figure out what spreadsheet I need it on for tracking. Thanks.
Comment 08/28/2024 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. 1. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. 2. Update your map features (if applicable) and 4. fill out the completion form. 5. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. 6. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Comment 12/30/2024 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Completion reports were due August 31st. Please fill out the Completion Form, update final map features, and upload during and after photos ASAP. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
10900 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
10901 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
10903 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
10909 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
Project Map
Project Map