White Sage Flat Habitat Restoration Project Phase 2
Project ID: 5902
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2025
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Bryce Monroe
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Fillmore Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
The White Sage Habitat Restoration Phase 2 will consist of the reduction of pinyon and juniper fuel loading southeast of Kanosh, Utah. This project will consist of several different methods to reduce fuel loading such as anchor chaining, reseeding of grass, forbs and shrubs also bullhog mastication of smaller pinyon-juniper trees with skid steer's we are also implementing hand removal through lop and scatter methods.
Location:
White Sage Habitat Restoration Project phase 2 will take place from Widemouth Canyon south towards Dog Valley southeast of Kanosh, Utah. Project will consist of treatments on State, Federal and Private Properties on the west side of the Pahvant Mountain Range.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The project is needed because the of current condition the percent of pinyon and juniper canopy cover in the grassland and sage-steppe community is too dense and not meeting the desired condition. The desired condition is for these communities to have conifer canopy cover of 10% or less. The stands proposed for treatment currently contain between 10 and 30 percent of phase 1/2 conifer cover. This "gap" between current and desired condition points to a need for management. Over the past several decades the west slope of the Pahvant Mountains has seen a gradual shift from sagebrush/bunchgrass communities to thick stands of Utah juniper and two-needle pinyon pine. In the current state, the treatment area is not effective in providing habitat for many of the wildlife species found there, also impacting livestock grazing. The increase in pinyon-juniper over-story also increases the risk of wildland fire, alters snow accumulation patterns, and increases overland flow and erosion during high runoff events. This will be accomplished through the implementation of mechanical bullhog work with skid steers, hand removal through lop and scatter work and the use of a two-way and one-way chaining and reseeding efforts. Project will consist of working with the Fillmore Forest Service, UDWR, USFWS Partners Program and the Pahvant Ensgin Ranches. The project will address the need to reduce encroaching Pinyon and Juniper within a late phase II to early phase III stage. Loss of perennial understory of grasses, forbs and shrubs is present, targeting these areas will improve a large portion of Federal land that is critical to winter mule deer, elk, wild turkeys and grazing of domestic livestock. Areas of this project have been treated in the past and the need to prolong our investment has been identified by the Fillmore Forest Service. UDWR has high interest in this project as well, the need to increase mule deer winter range is continued by working with private landowner who value wildlife and the resource it bring to the state/communities. This area is critical and sustains large wintering amounts of mule deer, wild turkeys as well as elk. The need to complete this project is critical for improved wintering forage for wildlife along the Pahvant WMU.
Objectives:
Objectives of this project is to reduce fuel loading through the removal of pinyon-juniper trees within the Fillmore Forest Service and the Kanosh Grazing Allotment. Reduction of the pinyon juniper trees will help improve understory that is suppressed due to encroachment, returning the overall treatment back to a healthy plant community with grasses, forbs and shrubs, that should respond due to improved water availability. According to the Fishlake and Dixie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plans (LRMP) the following goals will be achieved: 1) Achieve and maintain species diversity 2) Improve or maintain the quality of habitat on big game winter range 3) Reduce conifer and pinyon-juniper encroachment stands, improve riparian zone vegetation. 4) Maintain or enhance terrestrial habitat for all wildlife species that presently occur on the Forest. 5) Maintain or improve current capacity of big game winter range 6) Provide diversity and forage for big-game animals. The desire outcome is to reduce the current condition of pinyon-junpier which is currently above 30% to 10% cover or less. Improving the habitat/thinning PJ in these areas will result in multiple benefits, which include but are not limited to, improving habitat for wildlife dependent upon these various ecosystems, improving native species diversity, reducing hazardous fuel accumulations, reducing the risk for large scale, uncharacteristic wildland fires, which in turn creates a fire resilient environment with less risk to public and firefighter safety.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
This site faces a host of threats associated with increasing pinyon-juniper cover, including loss of grasses and forbs important to wildlife and cattle, increased risk of wildland fire frequency and severity, risk of invasive plant species such as cheatgrass replacing native and desirable introduced plants, increased risk of soil erosion, and lower quality and quantity of water due to continued decreases in watershed functioning. Nearly all of these are present to some extent and some and in much of the project area have combined to greatly limit many of the uses and benefits this section of land historically provided. All of these threats resulted from pinyon-juniper expansion altering the native sagebrush/bunchgrass community, and this project will address these risks by either restoring the site or at least improving it to a functional state close to the native sagebrush type. Another threat is the loss of the initial investment in the UDWR Chaining. Removal of the small PJ trees in the lop and scatter area is a cost-effective maintenance project allowing for Phase I trees to be reduced and prolonging the life of this project and the benefits it provides. Delaying treatment until trees are larger and more difficult to handle would greatly increase the expense of treatment and accomplish far less. Over the past several years doing work in this area and around the Central portion of the State we have seen the price of doing business almost double. Our lop and scatter contracts are increasing in price from $35-$45/Ac to upwards of $65-$85/Ac. Bullhog Mastication work is increasing as well pushing cost per acres up to $450/Ac. Working with and partnering with the Fillmore Forest Service and the Private landowner will drastically reduce the cost of implementation. Having partnerships to share the added expense of labor, fuel and equipment cost makes this project a win win for everyone. No action on this project will allow for increased invasive grass species, pinyon-juniper encroachment and increased soil erosion with no productive rangeland conditions. Late Phase II to early Phase III Pinyon-Juniper reduces the native understory of browse, shrubs and herbaceous plants species. This project will focus on reducing pinyon and juniper encroachment, reducing soils and overland erosion, reduction of invasive noxious weed and grass species, reseeding efforts will allow for shrub, forbs and grasses species to respond favorably within the identified treatment sites. Overland flows create soil sheet and rills erosion, which account for loss of soil due to the lack of understory of native plant species. Improved seeded grass forb and shrub species will reduce sediment loss and re-establish the inter-spaces allowing for intact soil and herbaceous cover to establish. Past history of this area includes depredating wildlife issues with wild turkeys and wintering mule deer within the Pahvant Ensign Ranches. Winter turkeys have created a lot of issues, in feed lots, hay stacks and in residential landowners yards. The UDWR implemented fall hunting in this area to help deter damages and crop loss for the wild turkeys, in addition trapping and relocating turkeys has been done in the past. Increasing numbers of wintering mule deer migrate to this area as well, seeking winter forage. This project will allow for increase habitat for mule deer, and wild turkeys to continue to utilize valuable winter range along the Corn Creek and Dry Creek drainages reducing damages to crops, haystack and reducing time spent around residential homes in the area. In addition, UDWR was able to capture mule deer this year (2023) in the Corn Creek drainage and the Eight Mile Point areas of this project. Opportunities to evaluate the amount of wintering deer use is critical in the depleting habitat in this area. Monitoring of the amount of deer use through collar data will begin this winter, we should have good data moving forward for future project in the area that will benefit wintering mule deer. This project was the District Biologist (Mike Wardle) #1 Mule Deer project within the Pahvant WMU, and was the top #11 Mule Deer project in the SRO. This project also was the #1 Turkey project within the Pahvant WMU and the #2 overall Turkey project in the SRO.
Relation To Management Plan:
The pinyon-juniper and big sagebrush areas lie within the Lowland Sagebrush Steppe Habitat type which is one of the key habitats identified in the Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) The proposed projects will address some of the habitat management strategies outlined in the deer and elk management plans for herd unit 21B (Fillmore Pahvant Unit ) including: *Continue to improve and restore sagebrush steppe habitats critical to deer according to DWRs Habitat Initiative. *Maintain habitat quantity and quality at a level adequate to support the stated population objectives while at the same time not resulting in an overall downward trend in range condition and watershed quality. *Work cooperatively with land management agencies and private landowners to plan and implement improvement projects for the purpose of enhancing wildlife habitat and range resources in general. *The project also helps fulfill the state mule deer management plan section IV Habitat Goal: Conserve and improve mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges. UDWR RESOURCE GOAL: Conserve, enhance and actively manage Utah's protected wildlife populations. **OBJECTIVE R1 Increase, decrease or maintain wildlife populations, as needed, to meet the objectives in our management plans. **OBJECTIVE R2 Maintain existing wildlife habitat and increase the quality of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state. ***OBJECTIVE R3 Increase our knowledge of crucial fish and wildlife habitats and migration patterns. ***OBJECTIVE R4 Decrease risks to species and their habitats through integrated implementation of the Wildlife Action Plan, species recovery plans, conservation agreements and other management plans (species, AIS, disease, etc.). ***OBJECTIVE R5 Manage sensitive species populations to prevent them from being federally listed as threatened or endangered, and work to delist those species that are currently listed. ***OBJECTIVE R6 Decrease vehicle collisions and dangerous wildlife encounters for people who live, travel and recreate in Utah. ***OBJECTIVE R7 Decrease the number of wildlife-related incidents -- including property damage, crop depredation and threatened or endangered species listings -- that negatively affect private property owners. *UDWR SR critical big game winter range are important browse communities that need to be enhanced and improved. The Division will employ a variety of methods to achieve this including prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, reseeding and seedling transplants, also mechanical treatments. Priority areas will include sagebrush-steppe and mountain browse communities. Falls within the rangeland focus area for WRI wildlife species for mule deer and elk. *This plan is consistent with the Fishlake National Forest Plan for wildlife habitat enhancement and fuels management to improve habitat, reduce fuel loading, and protect against catastrophic wildfire. *Other project have been completed by the Forest Service and UDWR in past years within the Corn Creek Canyon/Dry Wash HUC 12 area. *Project within the are also benefit the management plans objectives of the lower Sevier River Watershed, as this will reduced sediment run off and create a healthy rangeland communities. *Management Plans are also in conjunction with NRCS overall goals of healthy rangelands and communities, improving watersheds and reducing erosion and sediment. The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment *FFSL CWPP Process is a local Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) is a collaborative plan created by the fire department, state and local forestry, land managers, community leaders, and the public.The planning process maps values at risk, and requires actions to reduce risk, such as prescribed burning, fuel reduction, or other measures that adapt a community to better confront their wildfire threat. Area is also part of the Millard RWPP FFSL Plan which was implemented in 2014, there are Wildfire Codes and Ordinances associated with this plan. Project would also be relevant to NCS Goals and supported through the FS National Cohesive Strategies. CAT FIRE Objectives and Strategies: In 2013, the State of Utah developed the Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy (CAT FIRE) in response to the severe 2012 fire season. Reducing the catastrophic wildfire requires attention to three interdependent goals identified in the National Cohesive Wildfire Management Strategy -- Restore and Maintain Landscapes, Fire Adapted Communities, and Wildfire Response. These goals have been embraced throughout the development of the state's CAT FIRE strategy. Mitigation of hazardous fuels can change fire behavior making it easier to suppress. The effects of the mitigation, however, are not limited to life and property safety but will also affect forest health, water quality, vegetative species abundance, etc. As we continue to implement projects across the landscapes in Utah, the only way to truly be successful is to integrate existing programs, utilize local and federal partners and continue to educate the general public to create the desired shift towards more resilient communities and ecosystems. In addition to the above listed objectives the below goals/objectives are identified in the Mule Deer Plan for the Pahvant Unit #21: Habitat Protection, Improvement and Maintenance - Work with public land management agencies to develop specific vegetative objectives to maintain the quality of important deer use areas. - Coordinate with federal and state partners in designing projects that will improve fire resiliency and protect areas of crucial habitat. - Cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvement projects. Protect deer winter ranges from wildfire by reseeding burned areas, creating fuel breaks and reseed areas dominated by cheatgrass with desirable perennial vegetation. - Reduce expansion of Pinion-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinion-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects. - Seek opportunities to increase browse in burned areas of critical winter range. - Continue to utilize water sources that can benefit wildlife species where applicable, promoting year round water availability, seeps, springs, wetlands and mesic areas. In addition to elk populations on the Pahvant WMU are under objective, increased winter range forage is critical for elk use on the west side of the Pahvant Mtn Range. The FS has been proactive in treating several thousand acres over the last two years that will increase the wintering carrying capacity of elk in this area. The project will allow for an increase of over an additional 2,700 acres of winter range to be utilized by elk in the wintering months. The below goals/objectives are identified in the Turkey Statewide Plan: General Suitable habitat includes three key ingredients: trees, forbs and grass. Regardless of the type of environment, this combination must exist for turkeys to thrive. Trees provide food, daytime loafing and escape cover, and- --most importantly -- nighttime roost sites. Grasses and forbs provide food for adults and are especially important to poults as an environment in which they can efficiently forage for insects. Brood Rearing: During the first eight weeks after hatching, there are three essential components of brood rearing habitat. First - Poults need an environment that produces an abundance of insects. Second - Poults need habitat in which they can frequently and efficiently forage throughout the day. Third - Poults need an area that provides enough cover to hide, but allows the adult hen unobstructed vision for protection from predators. Therefore, the fundamental component of brood rearing habitat is herbaceous vegetation interspersed with trees. Herbaceous vegetation is key because it provides an ideal foraging environment for poults. Fall and Winter: Wild turkeys seek two imperative habitat ingredients in the fall and winter --food and roosting cover. Vegetation that turkeys utilize during the fall and winter is highly varied. Turkeys increase their use of forested cover during the fall and winter and decrease their use of open areas. Mast (pine nuts, acorns, berries) is the primary food source during fall and winter. Habitat value increases with higher proportions of mast-producing species in the forest and their degree of maturity. In mountainous environments, spring seeps are an important source of fall and winter food. Seeps provide invertebrates, mast and green vegetation. Because such water does not freeze, it provides a microclimate that allows foraging throughout the winter. Golden and Bald Eagles will benefit form this type of restoration treatment as well typically these eagles are found in open country, especially in mountainous regions. They feeds mainly on small mammals, especially rabbits, marmots, and ground squirrels, but it also eats insects, snakes, birds, juvenile ungulates, and carrion. This chaining project will allow for increased open space for hunting small mammals and other pray due to the reduction in pinyon and juniper woodlands. The increased of understory of grasses forbs and shrubs should increase small mammals and other prey species for the Bald and Golden Eagles to prey upon. Utah Milk snake and the Soroan Mountain Kingsnake occupy a variety of habitats, including farmland, disturbed areas, meadows, river bottoms, bogs, rocky hillsides, and coniferous and deciduous forests. To support these snakes, these habitat types must have plenty of cover and a healthy rodent population. Information on the limited due to the survey work of UDWR, some survey work was conducted by Jimi Gragg in 2019 stated: "On the maps - we have positive-occurrence data only for these species. We have a distribution-modeling project that'll start in the fall, but we will begin with higher priorities. It will be a few years until we get around to those 2 (although they are pretty ideal candidates - from a technical standpoint - to model, I think). As far as value of habitat - I've tried to address that before. Basically, *all* snakes are predators. These 2 feed exclusively on vertebrates - lizards primarily, and small mammals to a lesser extent. That prey base depends on a landscape that isn't excessively dominated by woody plants, and which also isn't depleted of its herbaceous component. Basically, there needs to be enough seeds and bugs - same story as for so much small wildlife. The location, objectives, and methods of this proposal are well aligned to benefit these 2 snake species. Hope this is helpful". With the reduction of pinyon and juniper woodland, and the increased cover from spoil piles of trees and limbs from the treatment we expect to increase the foraging range for these two predatory snakes and the availability of small mammals and insects across this treatment. Thus improving habitat for the Utah Milk Snake and Sonoran Mountain King Snake.
Fire / Fuels:
Implementation in the project area will result in reducing hazardous fuel accumulations and breaking up the continuous fuel bed of pinion/juniper that currently exist along the foothills of the Pahvant range. This treatment will promote a fire resilient environment that reduces the risk for large scale, intense wildland fires, with less risk to public and firefighter safety. The District Forest Service Fuels have implemented several prior projects Kanosh Bench, Dammeron Valley, etc. that has help reduce the likelihood of wildfire in the area and adjacent to this project, these projects consisted of reseeding along with Mastication. State and Private Landowners have been very proactive in implementing projects in the project area. The project will help to reduce the risk of large landscape catastrophic wildfire and help to protect valuable infrastructures to multiple watersheds including (Dual Springs, Dry Wash and Widemouth), Kanosh Indian Reservation, Kanosh Town, high voltage power lines, homes, cabins, outbuildings, hay sheds, livestock corrals, Hwy 133 and Interstate 15 all are located within and adjacent to the project area. It will have a major effect on Interstate 15 and Hwy 133 both have been shut down in the past due to the Milford Flat Fire, Meadow Creek Fire and other misc. fires in the area. A high percentage of human caused fires are started on roadways thus spreading further into the wildland, this project is located adjacent to I-15 and Hwy 133. By implementing this project, it will help reduce the risk of the fires from I-15 and Hwy 133 getting established on FS, BLM, state, or private lands. It will help to reduce the risk of large landscape size catastrophic fires not only to USFS, state lands but to private land, cabins, structures located within the USFS lands. This project will reduce fuel loading by removing the pinyon-juniper trees with a phase I lop and scatter treatment. Currently cheatgrass is minimal throughout the project, by treating and seeding this area the risk of catastrophic fire will be decreased significantly. Lower elevations (PJ dominated) on the Pahvant range are known for being taken over by cheatgrass after catastrophic fires. This project will reduce the risk of this happening. Treatments like this have been proven to prevent wildfire from spreading following an ignition event, and this treatment will create several barriers or buffers between treated and non-treated areas that will be critical for controlling or containing wildfires. The majority of this project is within fire regime III -- 35-100+ year frequency and mixed severity (less than 75% of the dominant overstory vegetation replaced); The Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) is estimated to be both moderate (FRCC 2) and high (FRCC 3) departure from the central tendency of the natural (historical) regime. The central tendency is a composite estimate of vegetation characteristics (species composition, structural stages, stand age, canopy closure, and mosaic pattern); fuel composition; fire frequency, severity, and pattern; and other associated natural disturbances. The majority of this project would be in FRCC 3. This project will improve the fire regime condition class to FRCC 1 I giving us some good ecological integrity in the treatment with improved understory and shrub components. Existing wildfire risk index in the project area ranges from extreme to moderate. We have uploaded the FFSL Risk Assessment in the documents tab for additional information on the fuel loading, flame length, water resource concerns, and at risk fire potential.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The current condition of much of the project area is Phase III pinyon-juniper stands with little to no understory of grasses, forbs, and shrubs. Meeting the project objectives would reduce bare ground, increase vegetative cover, increase infiltration, reduce overland flow, and ultimately increase stream flow and reduce sedimentation and phosphorous loading into the water supplies of the nearby town of Kanosh and Meadow. These benefits have been documented by research done in similar ecosystems (Deboolt et al, 2008). I found a webinar by the NRCS where the presenter mentions through her study that 130 pinyon and juniper trees she sampled within an acre (33% pinyon, 9% juniper and 58% inter-space) over a twelve month period would utilize and estimated 280,000 liters of water per acre per year or approximately 23% of an acre foot. And while the Quality of water will not be overwhelming the first year after treatment it becomes significant over time. This type of treatment will benefit the soil over the long term, due to increasing plants that will utilize the excess water, overland flows of rills will be filled in, chance for overland flooding will be minimized allowing for springs and seep to start appearing and improved rangeland conditions will benefit overall. Information from the Millard County Resources Plan addressing water Quality and Quantity: DESIRED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 1. Access for municipal water and secondary water development, quality management, or infrastructure construction or maintenance on federal public lands must be granted as soon as possible in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens. 2. Develop improved methods to reduce and remove sediment in storage reservoirs and continue stream bank stabilization efforts. 3. Where water resources on public lands have diminished because grasses have succeeded to pinyon-juniper and other woody vegetation, a vigorous program of mechanical treatments should be applied to promptly remove this woody vegetation and biomass, stimulate the return of the grasses to historic levels, and thereby provide a watershed that maximizes water yield and water quality for livestock, wildlife, and human uses. 4. Millard County will participate in watershed management on public and private lands to optimize quality and quantity of water. 6. Support projects to increase water quality and quantity in the county. 7. Maintain and improve our fresh water supplies and watersheds, and increase our watershed production capabilities. 8. Conserve and preserve water for agricultural uses in the county. 9. Millard County shall protect ground, spring, and surface water quality. 19. The county encourages actions by individuals, groups, and local governments that are aimed at improving water quality and supporting the hydrology of the county. Deboodt, T.L., et al., 2008, Monitoring hydrological changes related to western juniper removal: A paired watershed approach: Third Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds, p. 227-232. Also the addressing of the TMDL from the Lower Sevier River Watershed Plan states that through water and overland flows we can have high amounts of phosphors in the system that can drain into the Sevier River watershed. The implementation of this project would seem to help control it as we will be reseeding grasses, forbs and shrubs that would help control the overland flow slow down the sediment discharge in to the Lower Sevier River and reduce sediment, phosphors and other nutrient load by reducing the pinyon-juniper trees and improving the uplands. Researchers such as Kormas et. al, Roundy, Deboolt, etc. have well documented the correlation of Pinyon and Juniper removal to water quality and quantity. In our project area we expect to see these results through decreased erosion and increased infiltration rates. This will be evidenced by increased flows and lower sedimentation in Corn Creek, lengthened seasons and reaches on intermittent streams such as Dry Wash, Widemouth and Corn Creek, and raised water tables and benefits to the associated vegetation at Duel Springs.
Compliance:
NEPA assessment inventories have been addressed on this project under the Pinyon-Juniper Categorical Exclusion that was signed July, 2017, as it pertains to the Fillmore Forest Service Property. We are still required to address the Culture Resource inventories as it pertains to the Forest Service and UDWR Properties before we can proceed with the bullhog mastication portion of this work. Contractors will be contracted to survey both UDWR and Federal Lands and consultation with SHPO will occur prior to Habitat Restoration work beginning. UDWR will continue to work with the Federal Forest Service Agency on this project, UDWR and Project Manager will work close with Arie Leeflang (UDWR) to ensure survey contracts are in place and finalized before implementation is to take place.
Methods:
Methods Overview: Fillmore Forest Service Property - Bullhog Mastication 687 Ac UDWR Property -Bullhog Mastication 346 Ac Private Property -Lop and Scatter 420 Ac -Two-way chain, seed, 837 Ac -One-way chain, seed, 471 Ac Methods would include implementing one type of restoration project on the Forest Service portion we are implementing a Bullhog Mastication project that will use skid steers on 687 acres within the Kanosh Grazing Allotment. Equipment will be provided along with the labor by the Fillmore Forest Service Fuels Program. UDWR will partner with them providing fuel and funding to complete the bullhog work on USFS and UDWR Properties. Lop and Scatter portion on the Private (420 Acres) will be done using State Contracting working with State Purchasing to hire a suitable company to complete the project. With lop and scatter trees will be cut as close to the ground as practicable, and no live branches will remain on the stump. Within the lop and scatter area, cut conifer will be lopped to 48" and left on site with no piles to decompose naturally and provide seed source protection and ground litter. Preferred method will be utilizing contract crews for the lop and scatter/hand thin. We have had great success with this type of project and are seeing great results. The Joseph project which was funded in FY21 and completed March of 2021 has had an excellent response in a short amount of time. We are already seeing native grasses coming back. I will include pictures of the results. Contract Specification that may be included within the scope of work as an EXAMPLE are: Cutting: This is a "lop and scatter" contract, within this project there will 100% removal. Within the all pinyon, rocky mountain juniper, Utah juniper (Cedar), shall be cut. 100% Removal of all live and dead trees is expected. Trees shall be completely severed from the stump(s) where no live limbs shall be left on the stump of cut trees. All main branches or stems shall be cut from the trunk of the tree to meet scattering requirements. Additional treatment specifications: 1.Leave all deciduous trees and shrubs including bitterbrush, cliffrose, mahogany, aspen and oak untreated. 2. Do not exceed stump height of 8" (inches) within rocky areas; all other stump heights will be 4"- 6" measured on the uphill side. 3. Lop and scatter cut material so that slash height does not exceed 24" (inches) above the ground. 4. Cut material left on site shall not exceed 48" (inches) in length. 5. Leave cut debris below crossings or culverts where possible to dissipate the energy of water flow. 6. Use established roads and trails for all motorized travel to minimize damage to patches of sagebrush and other browse plants. 7. Thinning will occur only on 50% slope and less. 8. Browse species and oak will not be cut. 9. All cut trees shall be completely severed from the stump and have no live limbs remaining on the stump. 10. Trees identified as bearing trees, or any tree blazed or tagged to mark the line of any Government survey, shall not be cut or destroyed under penalty of the law. Trees with reference tags will be left uncut. Within the Pahvant Ensign Ranches (private portion) of the project, we will be looking at a large amount of in-kind services coming from them. Pahvant Ensign Ranches are prepared to do all chaining implementation on the private lands. They will provide all labor, fuel and D8-Dozers and the "Ely Chain" to complete the project. Total chaining acres to be affected within the Pahvant Ensign Ranches Property is approximately 1,328 acres through the chaining aspect of the project. Contract Specification that may be included within the scope of work as an EXAMPLE are: SPECIFIC TASKS: Work Limits: Only areas shown on the Project Map will be treated. The project areas will be identified with flagging and or verbally. It will be the contractor's responsibility to provide a GPS that is capable of loading project shapefiles of the treatment areas from a computer if necessary for the contractor or employees. Chaining: The one-way and two-way chaining shall be performed in an organized systematic manner as determined in the pre-work conference. This requires skilled operators. Seeding: Aerial Seeding will take place after the first pass or before the project has started on the two-way chaining portion of the project. The State will do all they can to ensure the seeding takes place in a timely manner. Tracked Cats must be capable of pulling the chains at a speed sufficient to roll the chain and prevent litter piling. Chain shall not be pulled at a speed in excess of 4 mph. The tractors will be operated with a maximum lateral spacing of 100 feet for this contract. The Government representative has the option of reducing tractor spacing below the minimum specified to accommodate specific terrain or conditions. The seed dribblers will be used on the back-chaining pass. The contractor is responsible for keeping the seed hoppers on these dribblers filled with seed at all times. Trees will be left as they lie following the chaining, no piling or windrowing will be required. Any internal roads through the project site must be cleared of all debris left by the chaining operation. Depending on project specifications, NEPA Agreements, Culture Clearances, Landownership habitat type and Restoration Techniques any and all specifications may change. The overall perspective is to do what is good for the watershed, overall rangeland health, wildlife species involved and the goals and objectives of the project.
Monitoring:
The Dammeron Deer Plot Range trend study (21B-12) is located within the project area and will be used to measure changes in vegetation over time. We also have the Range Trend Plot 21-R-11 which is the Kanosh Lop and Scatter Project that shows increase pinyon and juniper coming back in on the site from a 2008 treatment This location can be retreated removing young trees from the previous treatment location. Monitoring plans will also include UDWR and USFS bi-annual big game classifications used to monitor production and subsequent survival of area deer and elk herds. Fillmore Forest Service Wildlife Biologist will also conduct mule deer pellet count data associated with the project. Also, the Project Manager will establish a set of vegetation and photo points within a transect to collect pre and post treatment data. UDWR may ask for the GBRC Range Trend Crew to set a permanent vegetation transect for future monitoring of this project that will be read or surveyed for vegetation data every five years depending on their workload, in which this data can be uploaded in the proper forms. We will also be monitoring the chaining aspect on the private portions of this project out three-seven years and removing all whips that may be left during the treatment, The Fillmore Forest Service will enter into a AOI agreement with the Grazing Permittee before the project is implemented. The livestock permittee will look to keep the pipeline and trough located in Duel Springs in good working condition within the Kanosh Allotment as it will benefit them and their livestock during the grazing seasons. As re-seeding efforts of grasses, forbs and shrubs are associated with the chaining aspect of this project, the overall need to monitor the establishment is critical. We will work with Pahvant Ensign Ranches to monitor this treatment as we defer cattle from this area for at least two growing seasons. As with any disturbance on the landscape, comes questions and concerns about invasive grass species, and noxious weeds. We anticipate that we will see a influx of cheatgrass and some noxious weeds as the seeding is becoming established. The opportunity to address these invasive species will come from the aggressive seed mix that will include native and non-native plant species. We anticipated in the next phase of this project we would likely address a chemical herbicide treatment, possibly the opportunity to use Plateau or Rejuvra to help control invasive grass species if they are present. The UDWR will monitor the Lop and Scatter portion of this project, following up with if necessary to remove encroaching pinyon trees that may have been missed by the contractor. Overall, when the lop and scatter crews are working we will be on site to make sure contract specifications are being met. Ensuring that the pinyon/juniper trees are being cut within the identified areas of the project. We will be monitoring for these two snakes Utah Milk Snake and the Mountain King snake within our treatments. Mike Golden (USFS Snake Exert) as value of habitat - I've tried to address that before. Basically, *all* snakes are predators. These 2 feed exclusively on vertebrates - lizards primarily, and small mammals to a lesser extent. That prey base depends on a landscape that isn't excessively dominated by woody plants, and which also isn't depleted of its herbaceous component. Basically, there needs to be enough seeds and bugs - same story as for so much small wildlife. The location, objectives, and methods of this proposal are well aligned to benefit these 2 snake species. We are hope we can catch one this year, last year was tough on the Red Canyon Project, they slithered away. Over the past few week of December 2023, UDWR District Wildlife Biologist (Mike Wardle) along with a capture crew was able to net gun and conduct overall body condition health exams on several adult mule deer. They were equipped with radio GPS collars and released. One location was on UDWR Property located in the mouth of Corn Creek just east of our proposed treatment and Eight Mile Point, which is west of our treatment location. Information data will be available soon and we should have collar data as mule deer start to use past and proposed treatments in the area.
Partners:
Partners for this phase II consist of the Fillmore Forest Service, UDWR, and the Pahvant Ensign Ranches along with USFWS Partners Program (Clint Wirick). All partners are supportive of this project and are willing to commit a lot of time and effort towards making this project a success. This includes resting the treatment areas from grazing for two growing seasons. In addition to the local general public and sportsman's that enjoy hunting and recreating in this area, they too will also benefit from the Habitat Restoration Work that will be completed, the improvements made will last for many years to come. We have been working with and including all Federal and State Partners, as well as the Private Landowners who graze livestock within the treatment area in this effort. Contact with the private landowner's has been well received and they are willing to implement Habitat Restoration work on their private property during this phase of the project. We are seeing the results of past successful restoration methods that have been completed on other areas of the Pahvant Mountain, and feel that those restoration methods will work across property boundaries. Partnerships are import to the success of the projects we implement and to showcase them is important to our success. As we move forward cooperation with Federal, State and Private Landowners is critical to achieving long term restoration goals. All partners were involved with the planning and design of the White Sage Phase 1 and 2 projects. Phase 1 of this project included and includes cross boundary implementation of USFS, State and Private land. Partnerships within this scope of work includes all Federal, State and local County Agencies, they are in support of doing follow-up type of work within these areas. This lop and scatter treatment will maintain and help conserve or initial investment that took place in 2009. In addition to the treatment of older stands of Phase II to Phase III pinyon and juniper with reseeding of herbaceous grasses, forbs and shrubs is a great benefit for wildlife species. County Commissioners from the Six County Areas, showcase these types of projects each year as we conduct annual tours of habitat restoration work that has been completed in their counties. Local and state chapters of the MDF, NWTF, SFW, RMEF, FNAWS, UBA, and SCI have all been big supporters of these types of projects and funding each year come from them at a local level to help complete and fund this work. In addition UGIP have partnered in the past through grazing permittees to take part in this work as well. Doing this type of maintenance will allow for future reduction in cost as it pertains to the longevity of the overall project. All partners involved have a need and are willing to commit to making restoration enhancing projects a priority on their districts in the future. Areas identified within this project have been funded through WRI or other funding sources associated with or though the WRI Program.
Future Management:
The USFS will work with Pahvant Ensgin Ranch to implement a rest rotational grazing system on the bullhog mastication portions of the project that is consistent with the Fishlake National Forest Management Plan. Grazing will also be suspended for two growing seasons post treatment to allow the grass and forb species to establish. This will be written into the Annual Operating Instructions signed by the permitees each spring prior to grazing on the Forest. UDWR, USFWS Partners Program, Forest Service and the Phavant Ensign Ranches are strongly committed to improving habitat through restoration efforts to meet overall regional goals and objectives for wildlife and livestock grazing in this area. Success will be determined by the Management Plans of the Forest Service, Pahvant Ensgin Ranches and UDWR through proper grazing systems that allow for healthy rangeland communities. The Forest Service grazing permit states that the allotment will be managed to: a) provide for livestock grazing while maintaining rangeland in properly functioning condition. b) maintain healthy, sustainable rangeland ecosystems and restore degraded rangelands to meet Utah's Standards for Rangeland Health and to provide a wide range of public values... c) integrate livestock use and associated management practices with other multiple use needs and objectives to maintain, protect, and improve rangeland health. d) monitor and evaluate grazing allotments to maintain or improve rangeland productivity. This particular Forest Allotment has been productive but with improvement made through these treatments additional forage is expected. The permitees are very motivated and committed to management that will ensure productivity and maximize the useful life of this project. Working with the Pahvant Ensign Ranches they will enter into a Cooperative Agreement with UDWR and USFWS Partners Program as to the in-kind work that will be done on their property as well as some within the Forest Service. This agreement will be signed before work is to take place and move forward. Pahvant Ensign Ranches have Ranch Management goals and objective for livestock grazing as well as the present CWMU that they manage. The CWMU is critical to the ranch and they value the need to have wildlife on there property. Within the CWMU they have mule deer, elk and turkey permits available to the public for hunting opportunities. UDWR and USFWS Partners Program has provided services and help partner on habitat restoration work and fire rehab efforts. Working with the Pahvant Ensign Ranches in the past has helped them increase habitat and forage for livestock and wildlife over the last 12 years. Together they have improved over 20,000 acres within the ranch through habitat type projects and water developments. Other Future management goals will include following up with restoration treatments and the need to do maintenance projects such as removing smaller pinyon-juniper whips out of the treatments, improving shrub components through hand seeding of Bitterbrush or Cliffrose in specific areas. We will continue to partner and increase winter habitat in critical areas of the Pahvant WMU for mule deer, wild turkeys and elk as well as opportunities for livestock grazing to be increased and forage production across Private, State and FS Property.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
This project will increase the understory of the treatment area dramatically, allowing for increased feed for grazing livestock on the Forest Service grazing allotments. Pinyon Juniper trees are very dense and little to no understory is present. This project will increase grasses, forbs and shrubs species for livestock due to native and non-native seeded species included in the mix. The chaining aspect will open up areas to sunlight, reducing overall pinyon-juniper stands and allow of the establishment of seeded species to occur. Domestic livestock will be grazed on a rotation type system after two to three growing seasons, improved distribution can and will occur due to the improved herbaceous understory. The lop and scatter portion of the project will consist of working within the Fillmore Forest Service land use plan to address rotational grazing within the lop and scatter treatment as livestock grazing will not have to be deferred. Completing this treatment will allow for prolonged restoration work that will prepare us for the future benefits in the years to come. Through these restoration efforts we will be able to reseed and chain 1,328 acres of this project with perennial grasses, forbs, shrubs and browse that will contribute to improved rangeland health, increase water production for grass species, with less pinyon-juniper adding competition to the rangeland plants. Overall the private landowners should have more forage production and better weight gain and weaning weights on fall calves and overall production in the future due to the restoration efforts that are to take place within this project. The FS properties will also become more productive and improved rangeland health due to the scheduled lop and scattered efforts throughout this project. Over the past two years the Pahvant Ensign Ranches have been enrolled in the NRCS EQIP Program, in which they have benefited their property by installing several miles of pipeline and adding new watering troughs that will allow for increased water and storage across these treatment areas. These treatments and project will sustain the natural resources and distribute cattle across the allotments, as well as provide a water source for wildlife. Other sustainable uses towards this project will be the use of additional firewood that will be available, cutting of cedar post, cedar fence stays and access to additional hunting opportunities for big game such as mule deer and elk. Additional opportunities will be opened up for turkey hunting and upland game hunting as well. With the Millard County ATV Jamboree each year, riders from across the country enjoy riding trails in this area and enjoy camping and recreating within the Corn Creek and Adelaide Camp Ground.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$248,005.30 $52,066.70 $300,072.00 $438,505.00 $738,577.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Motor Pool Vehicle Use $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Private - Contract Lop and Scatter work for 419 acres @ $65.00/Ac ($27,235.00) $27,235.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
NEPA NEPA, clearances, ETC. $0.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 2023
Other USFS monitoring crew $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) Site preparations, flagging, project design, etc. provided by the USFS Fillmore Office. $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2025
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Expenses for crew (2 employees for 4 months est. $3,000/Employee) to complete the project for bobcat operators, administration, contract inspectors. This will be done through a Cooperative Agreement with Fillmore Forest Service and UDWR.. $24,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Equipment Rental/Use Road Maintenance provided by the USFS Fillmore Office $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 2025
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Labor for seasonal employees for noxious weed monitoring as well as supplies for weed control on the bullhog/mastication.. $5 per acre for 1,030 acres. $5,150.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Seed (GBRC) Seed costs associated with the chaining portion of this project for 1,328 acres. UDWR will partner with UGIP on a portion of the seed. (1,328 at $97.02/Ac) $83,747.30 $45,094.70 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services In-kind services from Pahvant Ensign Ranches for chaining 1,328 acres, use of two dozers, fuel and labor to complete the project. (Est. 1,328 Acres at $175/Ac) $0.00 $0.00 $232,400.00 2025
Contractual Services Aerial application of seed for the chaining portion on Pahvant Ensign Ranches. 1,328 acres @ $15/Ac. UDWR will partner with UGIP on portion of the Aerial Seeding Flight. $12,948.00 $6,972.00 $0.00 2025
Archaeological Clearance Archeological Surveys for the Bullhog portions of this project, associated with FS and UDWR 1,030 acres @ $65.00/ac $66,950.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Equipment Rental/Use In-kind associated expenses coming from the Fillmore Forest Service Fuels Crew towards this project. Est. 6 months, to cover the four (4) Bobcats ($102,600), vehicle mileage ($5,000), and misc. supplies, parts and repairs to the bobcats ($10,000). $0.00 $0.00 $112,605.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Expenses associated with the fuel that will be needed to completed the project, fuel will be provided through State Contracting. 6,500 gallons at $4.25/gallon. $27,625.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) UDWR Employee In-kind towards the project $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Materials and supplies for flagging chaining project, monitoring contractors, horse hire use. $350.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$130,466.00 $52,066.70 $182,532.70 $438,505.00 $621,037.70
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) S024 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) S025 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Utah Archery Association (UAA) S052 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Private In-kind cost share from the Pahvant Ensign Ranches for FY25' associated with the chaining portion of the project, includes labor, fuel and equipment to complete the chaining. $0.00 $0.00 $232,400.00 2025
United States Forest Service (USFS) In-kind cost estimate from the Fillmore Forest Service towards this project. $0.00 $0.00 $202,605.00 2025
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) UDWR in-kind cost towards the project. $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 2025
UDAF-Grazing Improvement Fund (GIP) T292 Private landowner $60,466.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
UDAF-Grazing Improvement Fund (GIP) Cost share from UGIP towards the seed and flight application of the chaining portion of the project. $0.00 $52,066.70 $0.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Data Gaps - Persistent Declines in Prey Species NA
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Sonoran Mountain Kingsnake N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Sonoran Mountain Kingsnake N4
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Utah Milksnake N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Utah Milksnake N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Habitats
Habitat
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
OHV Motorized Recreation Low
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Medium
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Utility and Service Lines Low
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
OHV Motorized Recreation Low
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Utility and Service Lines Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/13/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Utah Milk snake is no longer a N species. According to a 2021 WAP species addendum it was removed from the WAP. I don't think the database was updated before we all started proposals. Rankers I don't think can give a score on this species. This is something we'll have to ask. Nice large scale, cross boundary project though.
Comment 01/13/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryce Monroe
Clint, I had not heard that about the milk snake. Whatever is decided will be fine. Thanks for your comment, its a great cross boundary project that will benefit all.
Comment 01/13/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Cool pic of the kingsnake too. It only counts if it isn't from google though, ha. Really appreciate all the photos and supporting docs too. While on the subject I'm sure it'll help rankers if you can elaborate how the project will benefit kingsnake. Thanks.
Comment 01/14/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Thanks for the comment Clint. While this project is obviously designed more for big game and overall resource benefit we do add design features that benefit other species. One that we've been doing on projects on the east side it to leave piles of slash and debris in areas to improve habitat for kingsnakes, other reptiles and small mammals. While these have a downside with regard to fuels I often find reptiles, including kingsnakes and great basin rattlesnakes (sorry Kendall) in these leave-piles on other projects.
Comment 01/14/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Kendall is always trying to do good for rattlesnakes ha.
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Wheeler
While the benefit of these types of projects for reptiles is nuanced, many reptiles, including the Mountain Kingsnake listed, may benefit from downed piles for cover (as indicated by Sean), as well as removal of predator perches, reduced risk of wildfire, and the opening interspaces between shrubs and shrub structure for foraging. Careful use of reseeding will also benefit by removing annual nonnative grasses including cheatgrass and crested wheatgrass, which are avoided by many reptiles.
Comment 01/24/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Hey Bryce, Nice looking project. I am confused about the cross-boundary work as the map shows work across boundaries but the partnership section says "Phase 1 of this project included and includes cross boundary implementation of FS, State and Private land. Phase 2 is just FS lands with no state or private due to already completed project areas."? Anything used in project planning that could qualify you for "ENHANCED PROJECT LOCATION/DESIGN BONUS POINTS" on the new scoresheet?
Comment 01/24/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryce Monroe
Mike, thanks for the comment. So yes it does have work across boundaries. So what happened is phase 1 got fast tracked money and the lop and scatter portion was completed and the other work didn't and it included the cross boundary work. At first we were going to propose phase 1 with the mechanical and private along with phase 2 which was just lop and scatter for the FS. Talking with Kendall and some others we decided to propose it all under phase 2. I must have missed updating that section when we moved phase 1 to phase 2. I will get in and change it so it will match. Thanks for pointing that out!
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
In the larger lop and scatter polygon do you plan on leaving some islands?
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryce Monroe
Scott, with our contract specs that we used under the phase 1 portion of the project there will be a sufficient amount of islands and cover left over throughout the entire lop and scatter portion. Thanks!
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Bryce (& Sean), Are there pinyon jays using this area? Also, it is not unusual to see bald or golden eagles wintering in this area. Have you considered timing and impacts to these birds? Keith
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: N/A
Keith, I plan on looking this spring but we really don't have many pinyon jay sightings in this area. This may be due to the near absence of pinyon on this side of the mountain or because we haven't specifically looked for them much. We're pretty much excluding cutting pinyon pine on all our projects and this will be the case on White Sage 2 as well. As to eagles we do have some wintering balds closer to Corn Creek and Mortensens/Cottonwood and goldens could be found throughout the project area. We don't have any known winter concentration areas on the Forest, just scattered use, but if we find actively used bald eagle roosting sites we will follow the USFWS National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007) to minimize disturbance. And of course we won't be removing any large trees or snags favored for roosting.
Comment 02/04/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
I appreciate the emphasis on lop and scatter on the Forest Service lands. I have a couple of questions. 1. In the objectives you state: "Objectives of this project is to reduce fuel loading through the removal of pinyon-juniper trees within the Fillmore Forest Service and the Kanosh Grazing Allotment." However, in your response to Keith's question re: pinyon jay you state: "we really don't have many pinyon jay sightings in this area. This may be due to the near absence of pinyon on this side of the mountain... We're pretty much excluding cutting pinyon pine on all our projects and this will be the case on White Sage 2 as well." This seems contradictory. 2. Is all the seeding happening on private land?
Comment 02/04/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryce Monroe
Judi, thanks for your questions. To answer your 1st questions and to clarify, the NEPA covers Pinyon and Juniper. On the East side of the Pahavnt range there is more of a Pinyon Pine presence and on the west side of the range where this project takes place is more dominated by Juniper. We focus on targeting more juniper and have a set DBH for the pinyon pine. 2nd questions yes the seeding is taking place on the mechanical side of this project and not the hand thinning. We have had great results from past projects of native grasses coming back with the lop and scatter projects. There are actually photos showing native grass growth from the same type of project in the images and documents.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Thank you for your reply, Bryce. Appreciate the clarifications. One more question: Has the Forest Service engaged in tribal consultation for this project?
Comment 02/08/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryce Monroe
Judi, we are asking for funding through UWRI to complete the arch surveys and based on the findings we will be seeking concurrence with SHIPO and tribes as required under the NEPA prior to implementation.
Comment 01/25/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
The rate of introduced perennial grasses in the private land chaining seed mix is fairly high (5.5 lbs/acre) and could potentially limit the establishment of sagebrush and other shrubs/native species. Any possibility in reducing rates of introduced grasses or possibly separating sagebrush/select species in space from those grasses (strip planting)? Also, what are considerations for additional seeding in the bullhog portion? Would targeted seeding/planting (ATV drill?) of sagebrush, bitterbrush, or cliffrose be a possibility?
Comment 02/06/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Kevin, thanks for the comment on the private portion of this project, I can/willing to make adjustments to the seed mix if needed, reduction of or augmentation of the introduced species can be made before the final mix is approved. We would like to aerial apply the seed mix before the chaining is to take place,. Unsure on "strip planting" methods but would be open for discussion. As for the seeding of browse species within the bullhog application we have worked with the Fillmore Forest Service to attach a dribbler type seeders on the back of a bobcat to help seed these species. Thanks for the comment Kevin and the great ideas moving forward.
Comment 02/06/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Kendal is there anything being done to reduce the amount of cheatgrass besides seeding?
Comment 02/06/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Scott, thanks for the comment, Bryce Monroe and myself have worked on getting funding for this project over the last three years. We have made some strides in the first phase of the project completing a large portion of L/S. This year I decided to remove the Herbicide Treatment from the project hoping to reduce overall cost. I am hopeful that when funding for this project is allocated, we can follow up after the treatment is completed with a herbicide treatment of Plateau or Rejuvra to control the cheatgrass within the treatment area. Thanks for the great comment.
Comment 02/06/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Bryce, Great Project lots of work coordinating with the Pahvant Ensign Ranches on this. Since 2006 to present the Pahvant Ensign Ranch has been a great partner of Habitat Restoration work on the USFS Allotments along with improving their private lands. I would guess they have provided over $750,000+ of in-kind services and work towards several WRI Projects, Fire Rehab Efforts and Water Development Projects that benefit all wildlife species and improved rangeland health for livestock. Awesome Project.
Comment 02/07/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Bryce Monroe
Kendall, thanks for the comment! We have a great working relationship with Ensign and the division to do larger landscape scale projects that will have multiple benefits.
Comment 01/18/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Kevin Gunnell
The previous comment on seed mixes still applies to the current proposal. The rate of introduced perennial grasses is quite high at 6 lbs/acre in the chained private polygons. Recognizing cheatgrass is an issue on the site that these introduced species would likely be competitive against, these introduced grasses will likely also inhibit the establishment/persistence of desirable shrubs for big game and contradict an objective of the project. It also seems that there likely needs to be some other treatment than seeding to address the pressure of annual weedy grasses. A rejuvra/plateau treatment after seeding establishment mentioned in a previous response is a good idea to protect the investment, but a treatment to help reduce annual competition during seeding establishment may also be necessary to increase chances of any actual establishment (glyphosate or plateau application?). GBRC is happy to discuss options and details on both the seed mix and weed control.
Comment 01/18/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Kendall Bagley
Kevin, I appreciate the discussion about this project, I have made a few adjustments with the seed mix as per our conversation and reloaded it to the database. As per the herbicide treatment I'm reaching out to the landowner to advise of a herbicide treatment before the chaining and reseeding efforts take place. I will make adjustments in the database as well. As always thanks for the comments and discussions to make this project better.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
11275 Terrestrial Treatment Area Anchor chain Ely (2-way)
11275 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
11275 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (secondary/shrub) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
11276 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Skid steer
11298 Terrestrial Treatment Area Anchor chain Ely (1-way)
11298 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
11298 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (secondary/shrub) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
13702 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
Project Map
Project Map