UKC Table Mountain
Project ID: 5907
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Steven Barker
PM Agency: Bureau of Land Management
PM Office: Cedar City
Lead: Bureau of Land Management
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
This project would expand upon projects completed in this area while improving Mule Deer habitat, provide defensible fire space to private property and potentially expand Sage Grouse habitat. This will be accomplished by removing encroaching pinyon and juniper in sage-brush steppe areas utilizing equipment to masticate vegetation within the project. The entire project area is 1,882 acres.
Location:
This project area is in the Upper Kanab Creek area along the Skutumpah Terrace. This project area is located within historical critical mule deer migration areas and is located directly adjacent to the Panguitch Sage Grouse Management Area (SGMA).The proposed treatments site locations are located approximately 20 miles east of Glendale, UT and 14 miles south and east of Alton, UT.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Previous projects adjacent to the acres of this proposal have been completed in the Upper Kanab Creek Watershed and have contributed to the connectivity of habitats suitable for sage grouse throughout the watershed. The areas covered in this project will connect previously treated areas and provide additional habitat and connectivity for sage grouse, improve mule deer migration habitat and benefit other sage-steppe dependent wildlife. Although this area is not within mapped priority sage grouse habitat (PHMA) it lies directly adjacent the PHMA and is predicted to benefit Sage Grouse by expanding habitat. . Area partners and the local sage grouse working group have requested treatments in this area for several years, as there has been some movement of grouse through this corridor. The Upper Kanab Creek Watershed area is a high priority area for vegetation treatments by numerous partners because of the high diversity of wildlife, including sage grouse, mule deer and elk. The encroachment of pinyon and juniper within sage-steppe has negatively impacted soils resources, water and nutrient cycles, fire regimes, plant community structure and composition, forage production and wildlife habitat. This area also receives national attention because it contains the Paunsagunt and North Kaibab mule deer herds, which migrate between Utah and Arizona; the Paunsagunt herd is world renowned for being one of North America's trophy mule deer herds.
Objectives:
Primary objectives for this project include: 1.Reduce the density of Stage II & III pinyon and juniper trees to restore and preserve understory vegetation, including sagebrush and native grasses and forbs. 2. Improve 1,882 acres of substantial summer mule deer habitat and substantial year-long elk habitat by releasing both the existing understory and sagebrush component. 3. Increase brood sage grouse habitat and increase fall/winter sage grouse habitat adjacent to sage-grouse management areas (UDWR). 4. Increase connectivity on 1,882 acres of sage grouse opportunity habitat adjacent to the Panguitch SGMA (UDWR). 5. Improve water quality and quantity within the Upper Kanab Creek watershed. 6.Reduction of Hazardous Fuel Loads. 7. Align with Division of Wildlife Unit #27 Mule Deer Management Plan objectives by A. Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the unit by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. B. Seek cooperative projects to improve the quality and quantity of deer habitat. C. Provide improved habitat security and escapement opportunities for deer. D. Carry out habitat improvement projects. Protect deer winter ranges from wildfire by reseeding wildfire areas, creating fuel breaks and vegetated green strips and reseed areas dominated by Cheatgrass with desirable perennial vegetation. E. Reduce expansion of Pinyon-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinyon-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog, and chaining.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Even-aged, decadent sagebrush and the invasion of pinyon and juniper trees into areas once dominated by grasses, forbs, and shrubs increases the risk of losing key areas for wildlife (ie. mule deer, Elk). Without this project, perennial grasses, forbs and healthy shrubs (sagebrush and bitterbrush) will not exist. Collar tracking data shows high use in the area by mule deer. For mule deer these movements can span a large distance and this time of migration is critical to their health because it allows animals to access feed and other resources at the time of year when they are abundant. This project will also allow animals to respond to harsh environmental conditions that may significantly reduce their survival. Even-aged, decadent stands of sagebrush and the increase of pinyon and juniper also increases the risk of catastrophic wildfire in these habitats. The risk of cheatgrass and loss of sagebrush semidesert habitat after a wildfire could further impact habitat for wildlife. Catastrophic wildfire also threatens nearby infrastructure and outlying residential properties of the Deer Springs Ranch which has been designated a "community at risk" by the Department of Forestry Fire and State Lands (FFSL) . Adjacent projects identical to the proposed project have proved successful in meeting objectives. However, as with any surface disturbing activity in sagebrush ecosystems, there is a low potential for weed invasion. BLM will aggressively treat any noxious weeds in the area if found.
Relation To Management Plan:
The Upper Kanab Creek project area is adjacent to the Panguitch/Bald Hills population in Sage-Grouse Management Zone III: Southern Great Basin. The 2013 Conservation Objectives Final Report (COT) identified this area as having the highest potential for increase in Utah due to habitat treatments to remove pinyon-juniper. Key threats to sage-grouse in this area are increased predator populations, vegetation management (conflicting uses or lack of), energy development, and residential/commercial development. BLM Utah also recently completed an the Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment, which tied sage grouse treatment objectives and thresholds for disturbance to existing land use plans (in this case, The Kanab RMP (2008). Primary to this document is a section that integrates the State of Utah's strategy of improving greater Sage Grouse habitat through vegetation treatments by setting treatment objectives to increase areas available for sage grouse habitat and to reduce the threats of wildfire to sage grouse habitat (pp 1-13) (Section 2) (Appendix C). This project will both reduce threats of wildfire while also increasing available connectivity and habitat. Those involved in this project and other Upper Kanab Creek Projects continue to work with the local sage grouse working group like Color Country Adaptive Resource Management Local Working Group (CCARM). The intent of the Plan is to provide guidance and recommendations to meet the overall goal of maintaining and, where possible, increasing sage-grouse populations and improving habitat conditions in the Color Country CCARM Conservation Strategies: 1. Improve age distribution of sagebrush-steppe communities. 2. Improve water availability in brood-rearing habitat. 3. Improve wildlife and livestock distribution in winter and brood-rearing habitat throughout the next ten years. 4. Locate and monitor new active lek sites over the next ten years. 5. Maintain or increase sage-grouse populations through direct management. 6. Manage unwanted plant species in sage-brush steppe habitat. 7. Minimize impacts of new land developments and/or recreational uses on sagegrouse populations during the next ten years. 8. Take steps to reduce the negative impact of dramatic weather events during the next ten years. This project was presented to the CCARM group in December 2021 and received support from the council. Fire, vegetation management and invasive species are three aspects ranked as important considerations in this plan. This project falls within the Paunsaugunt Deer Herd Unit # 27. The Mule Deer Management plan was approved by the Wildlfe Board on December 5, 2019 will be in effect for five years (December 5, 2024). Unit Habitat Management Goals: 1. Manage for a population of healthy animals capable of providing a broad range of recreational opportunities, including hunting and viewing. 2. Balance deer herd impacts on human needs, such as private property rights, agricultural crops and local economies. 3. Maintain the population at a level that is within the long-term capability of the available habitat to support. 4. Continue with limited entry hunting. Maintain cooperative DWR/Landowner relationships. Southern Utah Support Area Fire Management Plan - This project falls under the Glendale Bench Fire Management Unit (FMU). Fire Management Objectives: 1. Using mechanical methods create a mosaic of age classes in the sagebrush and sagebrush perennial grass vegetation types. 2. Treat pinyon/juniper to create or enhance sage grouse habitat using prescribed fire on up to 22,000 acres aggregate with non-fire fuels treatments. 3. Convert 15,000 acres to sagebrush grass using natural fire, prescribed fire and mechanical treatments. Other plans that relate to the proposed project are: BLM National Sage Grouse Habitat Conservation Strategy (2004). Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 which state protecting forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands from unnaturally intensive and destructive fires. BLM's Final Programmatic Environmental Report: Vegetation Treatments on BLM Lands in 17 Western States Programmatic Environmental Report, June 2007, The Fundamental of Rangeland Health (43 CFR 4180) and Utah's Standards and Guidelines for Rangeland Health which address watersheds, ecological condition, water quality and habitat for special status species. This project is authorized under the Upper Kanab Creek Watershed Vegetation Management Plan NEPA UT- 040-09-03, (Decision signed in 2011 and Upheld by IBLA September 6, 2012). This project was designed to improve vegetation conditions for wildlife, but specifically for sage grouse. REFERENCES Frey, S. N., S. G. Lupis, K. Heaton, T. A. Black, T. A. Messmer, and D. Mitchell. 2006. Color Country Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) Local Conservation Plan. Utah's Community Based Conservation Program. Unpublished Report. Logan, Utah. Frey, S. N., S. G. Lupis, C.Reid, K. Heaton, T. A. Black, T. A. Messmer, and D. Mitchell. 2007 Southwest Desert Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) Local Conservation Plan. Utah's Community Based Conservation Program. Unpublished Report. Logan, Utah. BLM. September 2015. Utah Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. September 2015. US Department of the Interior Appendix C. Required Design Features (particularly as they pertain to fire and fuels). UDWR. May 2015. Deer Herd Unit Management Plan. Deer Herd Unit #27 (Paunsagunt). 8 pp. Southern Utah Support Area Fire Management Plan Environmental Assessment (UT-040-04-054).
Fire / Fuels:
Within the project area there is a large fuel loading build up and an alteration in fuel types. Pinyon and juniper trees and even aged, decadent sagebrush, once held to lower densities by more frequent fires, have expanded in range and moved into areas once dominated by shrubs, forbs, and grasses. Without this project, fuel conditions are such that an unexpected wildfire may be difficult to contain, leading to an increased risk to firefighter and public safety, suppression effectiveness and natural resource degradation such as loss of substantial summer mule deer habitat. Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) within the project area is predominately FRCC 3 which is where fire regimes have been extensively altered and risk of losing key ecosystem components from fire is high. This projects design lends to reduce fire risk to life safety, property, watersheds, and natural resources by restoring resilience and sustainability to a fire dependent ecosystem through the proposed activities. During the past 20 years, this area as experienced frequent but small fires, pinyon and juniper trees, once held to lower densities by more frequent fires, have expanded in range and moved into areas once dominated by shrubs, forbs, and grasses. Current closed tree canopy and material on the ground (ladder fuels) has increased the risk of catastrophic wildfire. (ie. 2019 Deer Range Fire totaling 301 acres). Treatments identified within this proposal (mulching) would help reduce hazardous fuel loads, create fuel breaks, and reduce the overall threat of a catastrophic wildfire which could impact outlying residential properties and infrastructure of the Deer Springs Ranch and other private inholdings in the area. Treatments in and around the sagebrush semi-desert habitat would break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of wildfire entering these sensitive areas. Removing pinyon and juniper and decadent sagebrush in a mosaic pattern would also break up continuous fuels and reduce the risk of a high intensity wildfire. Because there is a greater risk of conversion of shrublands to annual grasslands under a high intensity fire, managed, pro-active treatments proposed would reduce the likelihood of cheatgrass invasion and help perennial grasses and forbs persist long-term. The treatment proposed would help to effectively return this area to more resilient landscape by placing the fire regime closer to the historical range (FRCC1), where fire plays a role in the ecosystem.
Water Quality/Quantity:
The project area is within the upper portions of the Paria and Kanab Watersheds (HUC8 #: 1407007 and 15010003 respectively). Soils within this year's proposed treatment area are shown to be suitable for the proposed treatment activities designated for pinyon/juniper. Data has shown this area likely supported a wider community of grasses and forbs, with pinyon/juniper as a smaller component of the vegetation community. Over time this area that has numerous natural canyon's as well as many seeps and springs began to lack the desired understory vegetation and has shown an increased in upland and riparian erosion, which has resulted in severe headcutting and downcutting in some areas. Removal of pinyon/juniper will allow perennial grasses and forbs to return to the site, adding stability to the soil layers and help reduce upland erosion. Creating an early seral stage of vegetation will do much to reduce the overland flow of water in these area, as well as helping to increase water kept on site for longer periods of time. In addition, BLM has made efforts to utilize woody material within washes to stop or slow overland flow. These efforts have been successful and cost little to no money and no additional resource damage. Most recent research (Kormas, et. al. 2016) found that when shrub-steppe communities and grasslands convert to pinyon and juniper woodlands, the water cycle and local weather pattern is significantly altered. Snow deposition and the timing and magnitude of melt can alter delivery of water to the soil, which can then impact plant growth. This study found that more water is lost to evapotranspiration and snow melts earlier in pinyon and juniper than in sagebrush-steppe areas. The study concludes that sagebrush vegetation can effectively capture, store and deliver water and better sustain vegetation diversity necessary for sage grouse and ecological processes than pinyon and juniper dominated areas. The majority of soils within the Proposed Action area are suitable for the treatment activities designated for pinyon/juniper treatment, sagebrush treatment and retreatment. Many of the soil types found within the watershed will and likely did support a wider community of grasses and forbs, with pinyon/juniper as a smaller component of the vegetation community. Removal of pinyon/juniper will allow perennial grasses and forbs to return to the site, adding stability to the soil layers and reducing upland erosion. References: Roundy BA, Young KR, Cline N, Hulet A, Miller RF, Tausch RJ, Chambers JC, Rau B. 2014. Pinyon-juniper reduction increases soil water availability of the resource growth pool. Rangeland Ecology and Management. 67:495-505. Young KR, Roundy BA, Eggert DL. 2013. Tree reduction and debris from mastication of Utah juniper alter the soil climate in sagebrush steppe. Forest Ecology and Management. 310:777-785. Kormas, P.R., et. al. Ecosystem Water Availability in Juniper versus Sagebrush Snow-Dominated Rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2016.05.003
Compliance:
Archaeological clearances will be completed prior to the 2023 Fiscal Year. Wildlife clearances will be completed prior to the 2023 Fiscal Year. Currently the Kanab Field Office is working on a DNA that will be in support of the Upper Kanab Creek Watershed Vegetation Management Plan NEPA UT- 040-09-03, (Decision signed in 2011 and Upheld by IBLA September 6, 2012)
Methods:
1,882 acres of Stage II and Stage III condition class pinyon/juniper areas will be masticated during the Fall of 2022. Islands and corridors of pinyon and juniper would remain untreated throughout the unit, creating a mosaic pattern of treated and untreated vegetation. Before the mastication treatment, the area would be broadcast seeded. Both introduced and native species may be used to help ensure project success. Introduced species may be used in the seed mix to provide immediate soil stabilization and competition with exotic weed species. Natives will be included for long term site stability, drought resistance, and diversity. A mix of native and non-native shrubs, grasses and forbs are important for improving sage grouse winter and brooding habitat, substantial mule deer summer range and elk habitat. An adequate amount of both black and mountain sagebrush is present in the understory to restore the sagebrush component to the area. Seedings would be rested from cattle grazing for a minimum of two complete growing seasons. A cultural contract will be awarded and concurrence with SHPO will occur the year before implementation of the 1,882 acres of this project. Masticated areas will likely need a follow-up hand-thinning approximately 5 years from initial treatment to protect the investment made by partners.
Monitoring:
In order to determine the success of various seed mixes and treatments, monitoring would be conducted by BLM and UDWR personnel or contractors. Monitoring would consist of nested frequency or other BLM monitoring techniques and photopoints Vegetation Monitoring Plans: The Kanab Field Office has established nested frequency plot studies and continues to monitor upland sites in all of the affected allotments every 5 years. In addition to the existing monitoring sites, as projects are implemented a nested frequency plot study will be established in each treatment area to measure success and long term stability of the site. Trend monitoring occurs on Allotments within the Kanab Field Office approximately every five years. Monitoring studies will be conducted on all vegetation treatments that occur on the Monument to study the changes in vegetation composition over time as a result of the treatments. Monitoring techniques could include photo points, nested frequency, line intercept, etc. The type of study may vary by site and by treatment BLM continues to take an aggressive approach to noxious weeds, through monitoring/control/education/eradication program. The Kanab Field Office is an active participant in the Canyon Country Cooperative Weed Management Area (CWMA), which aims at treating weeds across all jurisdictional boundaries. Noxious weeds would be controlled on all disturbed areas when detected. Wildlife Monitoring Plans: This year, each BLM Field office will have entire team devoted to the Assessment, Inventory and Monitoring program (AIM), and although the sample points are random, it is likely that some of these points will fall within the project area. This monitoring program uses standard core indicators and methods to provide a statistically valid sampling design across the landscape. Additionally, this project falls adjacent to potential sage grouse habitat. Habitat Assessment Framework monitoring is a multiscale, sage-grouse habitat assessment tool that will be integrated with the AIM. This monitoring is done from a broad-to-fine scale. The dataset at the site scale (which includes this project) describes habitat indicators, such as sagebrush cover, sagebrush height, grass and forb cover, riparian stability, and/or proximity of detrimental land uses and structures. These data will ensure appropriate project implementation, as well as guide future actions in sage grouse habitat. Currently, there are no AIM, HAF (sage grouse) monitoring points in this treatment area; however, these areas will be prioritized for data collection during 2022. There are also no UDWR trend studies in this area. This area continues to be monitored for sage grouse, (vhs collars in collaboration with Alton Coal and the CCARM). Color Country Adaptive Resource Management Group (CCARM) has tracked grouse in this area providing information for their locations, travel patterns, seasons of use, and duration time in habitats. This information will tell if the areas to be treated are successful in provide more habitat for sage grouse. Current research shows they are using the treated areas. The Paunsagunt mule deer herd is also monitored by UDWR throughout this area both through range trend monitoring, population modeling and actual harvest data. Information would continue to be collected from existing BLM and DWR studies, which include vegetation trend and deer/elk pellet counts. Monitoring sites established outside of treatment areas could be used to compare results on treated vs. untreated areas. Additional monitoring sites would be established by DWR and BLM as deemed necessary to monitor success.
Partners:
The Upper Kanab Creek Watershed Vegetation Management Project is a result of several years of planning and collaboration among interested parties groups and organizations, and Federal, State and local government agencies. Many partners/groups have provided funds as well as ideas to the success of the project. Coordination has taken place with the Kanab Field Office wildlife biologist, the Color Country District sage grouse biologist and the Division of Wildlife biologist for the area. Input from these biologists was critical in the planning of this project. The Upper Kanab Creek Watershed Plan which identifies concerns and priorities within the project area was accomplished by many partners (Federal, State, and Private). Those involved in this project and other Upper Kanab Creek Projects continue to work with the local sage grouse working group like Color Country Adaptive Resource Management Local Working Group (CCARM). This project was presented at the CCARM meeting on December 8, 2021 and received support from the committee. Upper Kanab Creek Watershed Vegetation Management Project Partners: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Forestry Fire and State Lands, Kane County Conservation District, Color Country Adaptive Resource Management Sage Grouse Working Group, Utah Partners for Conservation and Development, Color Country Resource Conservation and Development, Mule Deer Foundation, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, Safari Club, SITLA, and local livestock grazing permittees.
Future Management:
This project area is within the Mill Creek grazing allotment. All areas seeded will be rested for a minimum of two complete growing seasons or until the seedlings become established and set seed. Once seeding establishment has been confirmed, BLM may authorize grazing according the the Utah's Fundamentals of Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Grazing Management (2007). Vegetation will continue to be monitored for utilization, cover and trend. Following the rest period, the current management plan will govern. The current plan allows grazing every other year. If needed, grazing adjustments would be made in Grazing Allotment Plans and through the grazing permit renewal process.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The treatment will provide a variety of resource benefits, including a grazing management benefit. The Upper Kanab Creek Table Mountain project area is within the Mill Creek grazing allotment. Livestock use on these allotments occurs between June 1 - September 30. The acres of the allotments within the project area are in mid to late seral stages with a static to downward trend due to even-aged, decadent sagebrush and encroachment and infilling by pinyon and juniper. Pinyon and juniper is out competing the shrub and herbaceous components thus reducing available forage for livestock and wildlife. Rangeland conditions are expected to improve following implementation of the proposed vegetation project. The health, vigor, recruitment and production of perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs would improve which would provide a more palatable and nutritional source of forage for both livestock and wildlife. This will aid in improved rangeland conditions throughout the allotment. Implementation of this project would eventually improve overall livestock performance (e.g. increased cow weights, increased calf crops, increased weaning weights, etc) and improve the economic stability of the permittees due to an increase in the quantity and quality of grasses and other herbaceous forage which are important to livestock grazing. Production of past treatments on the Upper Kanab Creek project have increased from 30 lbs/acre to over 3,000 lbs/acre once seeding was established. There is no plan at this time to change the grazing regime or AUM's. Diversifying the vegetation and providing a variety of seral stages will benefit both livestock and other wildlife within the area. Current recreation uses and opportunities within the project area include dispersed activities such as hunting, sightseeing, driving for pleasure, accessing canyons for scenic photography or canyoneering, nature study, wildlife photography and hiking/backpacking/camping. These activities may be temporarily disrupted or displaced during actual land treatments. In the short term, posttreatment areas may become less or more attractive to the recreating public, depending on the nature of their activities and their preferred settings. For instance, creating more open areas might enhance wildlife viewing opportunities, but it might also discourage photographers in search of totally natural-appearing, unaltered landscapes. As native vegetation becomes reestablished on treatment areas, those sites will also probably attract some recreation activities while discouraging others, due to the altered vegetative cover, scenery, naturalness and use by wildlife species. The Table Mountain project area is located and is home to Mule Deer from the famed Paunsaugunt hunting unit. This area is unique to the fact that it is one of only three hunting units in the state of Utah labeled as a Premium Mule Deer hunting unit. The Paunsaugunt deer unit draws hunters each year from areas nation wide and brings in large amounts of dollars from the sale of conservation permits to hunters seeking the opportunity to hunt this area. These conservation dollars in turn can be used in the future for improving habitats and needed wildlife projects. This project will help in maintaining/improving the area for these opportunities, as well as improve the overall health of big game populations in the area. Non-use agreements have been signed by the permittees to allow rest for a minimum of two growing seasons or until it is determined that recovery efforts have met the objectives outlined for this project.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$1,004,761.00 $5,000.00 $1,009,761.00 $20,000.00 $1,029,761.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Archaeological Clearance Class III Arc clearance contract on BLM administered lands (1,882 @ $50.00/ac) $94,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Other Cadastral Survey $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Project layout, contract preparation, and contract administration for mechanical mulching, aerial seeding and archaeological contracts. $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2023
Seed (GBRC) Seed Mix For Bureau of Land Management administered lands (1882 @ 93.88/ac) $176,681.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Aerial seeding contract for Bureau of Land Management Lands. (1,882 @ $15/Ac) $28,230.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Mechanical Mulching contract (1,882 acres @ $375/ac) on BLM administered lands. $705,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM (Sage Grouse) A096 Mod 8 - Moved to 5888 - $24,000 $0.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 2024
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Black Bear
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Loss of Genetic Exchange / Inbreeding Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Habitats
Habitat
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/24/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Steve, Thanks for the Migration Initiative map for deer. Would be interesting to see maps for sage grouse use in adjacent areas. Any plans to treat or interaction with adjacent private landowners. What about adjacent Monument lands?
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Mike, thank you as always for looking over the proposals and for your feedback. I have attached a jpeg that we acquired from Dr Frey at Utah State University regarding Sage Grouse and their current habits in the area. The jpeg shows some historic use areas but we are excited to see recent use of grouse of the recently treated areas near this proposal, as shown on the map, and we are confident that additional treatments could expand that use. We are working with landowners, permitees, and the NRCS for this area and plan to continue to involve them in the future. There is a project currently being implemented and funded through NRCS in the area. Also attached is a map for our three year plan and adjacent private lands. As we move closer to the Deer Springs community we plan to work with the homeowners association, and adjacent landowners to improve fire safety for their community. At this current time we do not have any projects planned for the adjacent monument lands.
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Thank you for being concise. I gave you bonus point for that.
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Thank you Scott, appreciate you taking the time to look over the proposals, we are excited about the future of this project area.
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Steven, Pinyon jays? keith
Comment 01/28/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Keith, thank you for your comment and discussion on the Pinyon Jay. The UKC Table Mountain area has no known communal Pinyon Jay roosting nor nesting areas. We plan to inventory the area (preferably between the dates of March 1 - May 30th) for any roosting or nesting areas. We plan to incorporate these areas into our "leave" areas for habitat that meet the recommendation of 1,200 m (0.7 miles) of no disturbances or vegetation removal for colony sites, as well as integrating timing stipulations for project implementation. During project preparation we plan to work with the local BLM biologist to implement these design features into the project layout.
Comment 01/31/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Hey there Steve. Thanks for great photos and maps again. Can you touch on cheatgrass or other weedy species more. I notice the seed mix is a little more aggressive then other like Yellow Jacket and I'm kinda assuming this might be part of it. I know they are totally different areas but I feel like the question might come up or other might think about it. Might be a good opportunity to expound here. I noticed in the photos needel and thread did really well in the treated areas. Was this seeded? Just curious. Have you seeded showy goldeneye before? Just curious again. I've tried to get it but so far it hasn't been available.
Comment 02/02/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Clint, thank you for taking the time to review the project. The current seed mix for this project is a result of multiple phases of work and coordination with multiple parties including GBRC, the Utah Division of Wildlife, multiple biologists, and Brigham Young University (BYU). We are working with GBRC and BYU currently to do some test plots in the area. We have worked closely with GBRC and incorporated their adjustments to the mixes. The showy goldeneye is a recommendation given to us from GBRC for the area so I am not sure if we will get it or not. We do have a slightly more aggressive mix in this area to prevent invasive plants from becoming ecologically dominant, creating near-monocultures that result in reduced wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, livestock forage, and altered fire regimes. This particular area is a little more susceptible to cheat grass than the Yellowjacket area therefore you see the slight adjustments to the mixes. The needle and thread you see in the photos established without seeding.
Comment 02/02/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Nicki Frey
For ranking purposes, could you touch on why the SITLA (assuming) parcel is not included? You mentioned that they were partners, so I am guessing you did ask, but it was excluded for a reason. Thanks, Nicki
Comment 02/02/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Nicki, thank you for looking over the project. Thanks for the great question so we can clarify. Coordination with SITLA took place early on in the planning process for the Table Mountain project, due to recent ownership changes the SITLA land adjacent to this project was excluded from this proposal. We will continue to coordinate with the landowners and SITLA as we move forward with our 3 year plan of work in the area.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Questions: 1. What are the ESDs for the project area? It would be helpful if you included the ESDs and any soil survey, if one was completed. Based on the ESDs, what is the composition and frequency of native species appropriate to the area? The provided seed mix does not comport with restoring the composition and frequency of native species based on the ESDs. The BLM should be focused on restoring native plant communities, not seeding non-native species such as crested wheatgrass, Russian wildrye, alfalfa, small burnet, sainfoin and forage kochia. 2. What is the BLM doing to ensure that these non-native species do not cross boundaries into the adjacent GSENM? 3. Numerous projects have been implemented in the area with more planned to be implemented in the near future. What are the cumulative impacts of so many past, present and proposed veg management projects and seedings w/a significant amount of non-native species? 4. Has the grazing allotment been analyzed to determine compliance with the Utah Standards for Rangeland Health? If so, what did those analyses show? How has livestock grazing contributed to the current degraded conditions of this landscape? One reason that P-J and sagebrush ecological sites transition to degraded conditions with dense P-J and/or sagebrush and lack of understory grasses and forbs is livestock grazing. What impacts are livestock grazing having in this area, and what is the BLM doing to change grazing management to address these impacts? The agencies should be addressing livestock grazing impacts concurrently with these types of vegetation projects to address grazing as at least one of the causes (if not the main cause) of the degraded ecological conditions necessitating these treatments, particularly in the face of drought and climate change. 5. What are the agencies doing to re-introduce fire into this area?
Comment 02/11/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
Judi: Thank you for taking the time to look over and review the project. The ESDs for this project show the vast majority of the site as an Upland Loam (Mountain Big Sagebrush) Eco site, with a smaller portion being an Upland Loam (Gambel Oak) site as referenced from soil reports from the Natural Resource Conservation Service. ESDs and soil surveys are now attached to the documents section. Seed mixes are not final and are dependent on seed availability and GBRC staff guidance based on the site, precipitation, and soil type. The seed mixes attached have been reviewed and adjusted by GBRC. The aerial seed mix is tailored to mastication areas, which are primarily Upland Loam (Mountain Big Sagebrush) ESDs, with an assortment of grasses to increase infiltration and suppress cheatgrass invasion, and erosion of soils typical of the area. An assortment of forbs in the seed mix will benefit multiple wildlife species and pollinators that inhabit the area. Where probability of success or adapted seed availability is low, desirable non-native seeds may be used as long as they support GRSG objectives. Re-establishment of appropriate sagebrush species/subspecies and important understory plants, relative to site potential, intend to be the principle objective for rehabilitation efforts. Seed flights will be conducted by a contractor using aircraft capable of using GPS tracmaps, Ag Pilot X or a similar approved program. Flight line files will be documented and submitted to the contracting officer upon completion of the contract. BLM personnel will also conduct on site inspections during the contract to ensure seed is only flown on project specified acres. Allotments in the Table Mountain area are meeting rangeland health standards. There is also trend and utilization monitoring that has and is currently being collected for these allotments. Utilization levels have been and are at appropriate levels. Permittees will rest seeded areas after the completion of the project. The Table Mountain area has been void of wildfire for multiple natural fire return intervals and is currently in an FRCC3 class and is in close proximity to significant infrastructure including the Deer Springs Ranch, thus introducing prescribed fire to the area is not an immediate tool being analyzed for use. As conditions and the site is returned back to an early seral state and an FRCC1 class, prescribed fire is a tool that may be analyzed for use for future projects and maintenance of recently completed projects.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
One more: What cultural surveys and tribal consultation are being/have been conducted for this project?
Comment 02/10/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Steven Barker
The Color Country BLM ensures that all projects are in compliance with state and federal cultural resource laws. The need for cultural surveys is defined by the treatment type and by applicability of Programmatic Agreements or Protocols between the relevant state or federal agency and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). For treatments identified as an undertaking under Utah Code 9-8-404 or the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and involve ground disturbing activities (e.g. bullhog; chaining), the BLM ensures that complete, intensive, cultural resource inventories and consultations with SHPO are complete prior to implementation. Tribal consultation takes place as part of the NHPA compliance process and is completed by the relevant federal agency before implementation occurs. Unless consultation with SHPO and relevant tribes agree to otherwise, projects that involve ground breaking treatments do not begin until the SHPO and tribal consultation processes are complete.
Comment 01/20/2023 Type: 1 Commenter: Nicki Frey
The Color Country sage-grouse working group reviewed this project in 2022. We feel that this project would continue to open up the landscape in the area. Past research indicates that the sage-grouse in that area will use newly treated areas almost as soon as they are available.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
10961 Terrestrial Treatment Area Bullhog Full size
10961 Terrestrial Treatment Area Seeding (primary) Broadcast (aerial-fixed wing)
Project Map
Project Map