Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project (Phases 7-9)
Project ID: 5919
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Kelly Cornwall
PM Agency: U.S. Forest Service
PM Office: Richfield Ranger District
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Phases 7, 8, and 9 of this project proposal will involve improving aspen ecosystems on Monroe Mountain by mechanically thinning conifer from ~600 acres of aspen/year on both USFS and adjacent private lands, ~396 acres of thinning including commercial timber sales (2-3 years), prescribed burning ~2,000-3,000 acres/year, pile burning ~600 acres/year, seeding ~1,000 acres/year and continuing aspen and boreal toad monitoring efforts.
Location:
The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project includes south-central Utah's Monroe Mountain, located south of Richfield, west of Koosharem, and east of Marysvale. The greater Monroe Mountain area encompasses approximately 175,706 acres of National Forest lands administered by the Fishlake National Forest's Richfield Ranger District, and approximately 11,805 acres of private inholdings.
Project Need
Need For Project:
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY: During (Phases 1-6) there has been ~33,000 total acres treated across Monroe Mountain; mostly within the southern 1/3 portion of Monroe Mountain. (see attached Monroe Mountain Completed Treatments Map in the Images/Documents Section) Treatments within this southern 1/3 portion are mostly complete. Phases 7, 8, 9 consist of treating ~2,800-3,800 acres per phase (~8,300-11,340 acres total) mostly consisting of prescribed fire within the northern 1/3 portion of Monroe Mountain. Some prescribed fire treatments are still planned in the southern 1/3 as well during these next 3 years. Mechanical treatments are planned to be completed in both the northern 1/3 and the middle 1/3 portion in preparation for future prescribed fire treatments. The total estimated cost is $398-$543 per acre for implementation. The WRI portion for investment into this project is estimated at $201-$275/acre, which is roughly half of the total funding required. NEED FOR PROJECT: Aspen canopy cover on Monroe Mountain has decreased by over 70%, or 40,000 acres, in the last 200 years. Restoring aspen ecosystems on Monroe Mountain is critically important and will have lasting beneficial effects. Aspen restoration at this scale on Monroe Mountain will help improve and maintain population viability for a variety of wildlife species (elk, deer, raptors, neo-tropical migratory birds, small game, insects, etc., along with promoting a fire resilient ecosystem across Monroe Mountain. The project will also enhance watershed integrity by promoting fire resilient aspen ecosystems across numerous watersheds. The purpose of this project is to continue to restore aspen ecosystems on Monroe Mountain by achieving the desired conditions described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Continuing project treatments at a large scale across Monroe Mountain is needed to not only address the significant aspen decline across the mountain, but also to mitigate the consistent ungulate pressure on aspen saplings within completed treatments that threaten the projects overall success. This mitigation will be accomplished by maximizing overall size of treatments to attempt to overwhelm the ungulates using the areas with an abundant supply of aspen sprouts. Recent treatments from previous phases are showing good results primarily because of larger treatment footprints with great aspen response within the treatment. Continuing to restore aspen ecosystems on Monroe Mountain will result in multiple benefits, which include but are not limited to: (1) Improving and increasing the amount of habitat for wildlife species dependent upon aspen ecosystems (i.e., Mule deer, elk, and Northern goshawk); (2) Improving and increasing the amount of habitat and forage for domestic ungulates (i.e., cattle and sheep); (3) Improving native species diversity; (4) Reducing hazardous fuel accumulations; (5) Reducing the risk for large-scale, intense wildland fires. This results in lower risk to the safety of the public and firefighters. This also results in lower risk to sensitive wildlife species (i.e., Northern goshawk, Western Boreal toad (Anaxyrus boreas boreas), and Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah)). Boreal toads are also benefited as aspen regeneration provides food for beavers who in turn create more boreal toad breeding habitat; and (6) Increasing the probability that future naturally caused fires can be managed (if possible, not suppressed) and allowed to play the greatest feasible natural role in the aspen ecosystems on Monroe Mountain. Vegetation treatments that encourage aspen regeneration on spring and summer range will continue to provide quality deer fawning and elk calving habitat. A productive understory combined with some dead and down trees is optimal habitat for big game birthing. Recent studies done by BYU and UDWR on Monroe Mtn. have shown that deer coming off good summer range have a sufficient fat layer and acceptable body condition going into winter. It is imperative that additional acres are treated to benefit big game and livestock body conditions at the end of summer and fall. This project will continue to provide those opportunities to ungulate animals. Summer range in optimal condition for big game is essential for building fat reserves that will help them survive winter conditions. Small game and upland game will ultimately see an increased benefit over time as the project areas develop into a maturing forest. With this project being selected for the second time by the Joint Chiefs' Landscape Partnership Restoration funding with NRCS, mechanical treatments are also occurring on private lands located on Monroe Mountain in conjunction with treatments occurring on National Forest System lands. This will have multiple benefits that include cross boundary landscape level aspen restoration, reducing risk of fire on both private and USFS managed lands, and reducing risk of future prescribed fire activities to private property. Through implementation of this project, the amount of forage available to livestock is expected to increase significantly as a result. With the removal of conifer and planned incidental prescribed burning of mountain brush/sagebrush, the amount of usable grasses and forbs in the aspen and brush understory is also expected to increase significantly. With increased forage livestock distribution and management is expected to improve. This project will help introduce species diversity back into the Monroe Mountain area. Species (elk and deer) that favor early serial communities and early serial vegetation species will benefit from this project. This project will provide increases in forage and habitat effectiveness that benefit species such as ungulates. Distribution of ungulate pressure will be increased with the increase in useable, effective habitat. Mosaic patterns created by the project will be beneficial for most all other wildlife species across the ecosystem and will distribute ungulate herbivory across the landscape minimizing overuse to current key areas. This will allow newly treated areas to have favorable responses to treatments. There will be some short-term (3-5 years) temporary impacts to plant and animal uses of these areas during the implementation phase of the project; however, the overall outcome will provide much needed plant species diversity across the landscape that will last well into the future. Large infrequent fires are known to extirpate trout populations and habitats as the effects of fire increase ash loads, flood occurrence, and erosion (See the Images/Documents section for additional species benefiting from this project). Bonneville cutthroat trout will likely benefit in the long-term from this project as the risk of catastrophic fire is reduced through fuels reduction in and around Bonneville cutthroat trout-bearing streams. A conservation population of Bonneville cutthroat trout occupy the Manning Creek drainage including Manning Creek, Barney Creek and Vale Creek. This population will continue to be monitored, along with other aquatic species, to assess project impacts and ensure they are at levels conducive to population recovery. Monitoring will also provide information to improve design of future large-scale treatments to reduce aquatic impacts. Following treatments near streams, any aspen regeneration within 300m of streams should benefit potential beaver expansion and/or future beaver reintroduction which should increase the amount of boreal toad breeding habitat. Monroe Mountain has been a desirable location for wildlife telemetry studies in the past. Telemetry studies are still currently being carried out by the UDWR on mule deer. Elk, mule deer, goshawk, boreal toad, cougar and coyotes are wildlife species that have all been and continue to be studied on Monroe Mountain. These telemetry data have provided much needed information on specific population dynamics that include: home range, seasonal range, migration routes, fawning and calving areas, mortality, body condition, pregnancy rates, birthing success, and other factors. During the years of 1991-1996 the US Forest Service (USFS) and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) cooperated on an intensive elk telemetry study on Monroe Mountain. Eighty-one elk were captured in a corral trap at 6 different specific locations and 1 helicopter *net gun trap site. After approximately four to five years of data recording elk use patterns were very well defined. Even today these use patterns by elk on Monroe Mt. are still very much the same. As large acres continue to be treated with current management practices "elk use" patterns will start to change to some degree. Elk being gregarious by nature and were found to utilize (for cover or forage) a large percentage of available acres on the mountain. It was determined through discussions with other local wildlife biologists and sportsmen (personal knowledge of seeing actual elk or droppings) elk were able to utilize slopes that ranged from 0%-80%. In 1992 a total of 659 elk were aerial counted and recorded on Monroe Mt. In 1994 a total of 798 total elk were aerial counted and recorded on Monroe Mt. In 1997 a total of 697 total elk were aerial counted and recorded on Monroe Mt. With a "sight-ability index" added to aerial surveys from a helicopter it was determined that Monroe Mountain had an elk population of approximately 800 head. By collaring 81 elk on the mountain approximately 10% of the population would have received telemetry collars. Today it is estimated that approximately 1300 head occupy Monroe Mountain at some time during the year. Seasonal distribution will continue to occur. Habitat use distribution is a key component to aspen projects on Monroe Mountain. Habitat treatments that have been conducted in recent years has provided foraging opportunities and wider elk distribution across the upper elevations. Continued treatments will aid in a wider distribution of elk and deer forage utilization across the landscape. Mule Deer GPS Telemetry Study on Monroe Mountain have been underway for several years. Doe deer and fawn deer continue to be captured and collared in order to study seasonal distribution, fawning areas, and mortality rates. A few mule deer GPS telemetry maps from 2020 and 2021 are included in the Images/Documents section of this proposal. Also a 23 year cougar telemetry study was conducted on Monroe Mountain to gather information on cougar population dynamics, migration, predation activities, mortality, production, etc.
Objectives:
PROJECT GOALS: To help accomplish this purpose and need stated above, the Richfield District has identified a need to: (1) address the conifer encroachment that occurs due to the reduced occurrence of wildland fire primarily due to an increase in wildland fire suppression; (2) address aspen over browsing by domestic and wild ungulates. These are two of the primary underlying causes for aspen decline on Monroe Mountain; (3) Implement a landscape level aspen ecosystem restoration project to treat at least 62,000 acres on USFS lands over a 10+year period; (4) Implement treatments with a cross boundary landscape level approach through collaboration to promote treatment efforts on private and USFS lands to reduce risk of catastrophic fire and promote fire resilient aspen ecosystems; (5) Minimize project costs by promoting cost effective treatments along with increased scale and size of treatments. (6) Improve and expand habitat for wildlife including sensitive, threatened and endangered species such as, Bonneville cutthroat trout, Boreal toad, Northern goshawk, and Flammulated owl. Bonneville cutthroat trout in particular will likely benefit in the long-term from this project as the risk of catastrophic fire is reduced through fuels reduction in Bonneville cutthroat trout-bearing streams. TREATMENT OBJECTIVES: (1) Improve seral and stable aspen stands by reintroducing disturbances; prescribed fire and mechanical treatments to reduce conifer invasion and stimulate new aspen regeneration. (2) Within the mechanical areas, merchantable timber will be sold, and conifers will be cut, piled or utilized for wildlife fencing. Additionally, 80%-100% of cut and cured slash piles will be burned. To access the conifer, some incidental cutting of aspen may occur. (3) Reduce hazardous fuels while maintaining and improving fire resilient landscapes by improving the fire regime condition class to FRCC 1 and FRCC 2. (4) Increase overall forage production, habitat quality, and species diversity by treating in a mosaic pattern of 60% treated and 40% untreated that will create biodiversity across the landscape. (5) Improve and/or protect habitat for sensitive, threatened and endangered species and endangered species such as Bonneville cutthroat trout, Boreal toad Northern goshawk, and Flammulated owl.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Aspen dominated forests on Monroe Mountain have already experienced a 70% decline compared to historical conditions. With increasing shade from conifers and a decline in aspen dominated cover, ungulate browsing pressure across the mountain increases as ungulates concentrate browse pressure in fewer areas of high forage, causing negative ecological impacts across a wide range of vegetation types on Monroe Mountain. Without treatment, the amount of usable forage for ungulates will decrease and distribution of ungulates will continue to concentrate. If left untreated, a continued loss of seral aspen is expected due to the level of conifer infilling and low rate of aspen sprouts recruiting. A good majority of the seral aspen stands during this 3 year phase of treatment are fir dominant with fading live aspen. Observations of recent treatment during previous phases of this project suggest that treatments that occur in seral stands that have a higher component of aspen still remaining, will produce more aspen sprouts overall post treatment. Every year left untreated there are more and more aspen dying as fir infilling continues. This observation has also suggested that treating these stands in future will become less cost effective. More fir infilling will occur, less aspen will be remaining, and as a result when treated less aspen regeneration will be expected threatening overall success of the project. Stable aspen ecosystems are also expected to decline without treatment - which distributes browse pressure from recruiting aspen sprouts within these stands. Some stable aspen stands are composed almost exclusively with older trees near the maximum life expectancy for quaking aspen. Though the primary purpose of this project is aspen ecosystem restoration, incidental treatments in the mountain brush/sagebrush are anticipated. If left untreated, a continued loss of grasses and forbs is expected due to the level of mountain brush and sagebrush infilling and low rate of grasses and forbs sprouts. A good majority of the adjacent mountain brush and sagebrush slopes during this phase of treatment are brush dominant with fading grasses and forbs understory. Observations of recent incidental burning during previous phases of this project suggest that treatments that occur in this high elevation mountain brush and sagebrush will respond well with significant increase of grasses and forbs post treatment. Every year left untreated brush infilling continues decreasing overall forage production for both wildlife and livestock grazing. Wildfire suppression costs are extremely high, especially when suppressing fires in similar fuel types and loadings as present on this project. When wildfires occur, this could result in damage to private property and numerous structures, increased erosion, greater opportunities for noxious weed establishment, impacts to available short-term forage, stream sedimentation, and possible mud slides/flooding events. This project reduces risks to multiple communities and watersheds across the Monroe Mountain along with multiple municipal watersheds of Sevier Valley Communities. A majority of the project is in Fire Regime Condition Class 3 (FRCC 3). As described in further detail in the Fire and Fuels section, treatments would improve the Fire Regime Condition Class to FRCC 1 and FRCC 2. Habitat for sensitive species such as the Northern goshawk and Flammulated owl are currently at risk from catastrophic high severity wildfire. Implementation of this project reduces the risk of bad wildfires impacting these sensitive species. Design criteria are also included to help minimize short-term impacts to these species. The greatest threat/risk to this project's success is domestic and wild ungulate browse pressure on aspen saplings post disturbance. One of the critical elements to reduce the risk of browse pressure is to increase the pace and scale of project treatments. As all past phases of this project are still within browse height of ungulates, continued treatments at a significant pace and scale are necessary to assure that browsing pressure is dispersed across all treatments. The risk involved with increased pace and scale is having capacity and continuous funding to continue to concentrate large acres of treatments to disperse this browse pressure. Incidental mountain brush and sagebrush treatments will also aid in dispersing browse pressure by increasing forage production near aspen treatments. To aid attainment of at least 1,000 to 2,000 aspen saplings per acre and 400 to 600 aspen recruits per acre in areas where mechanical and/or prescribed fire treatments are to occur, browse thresholds and adaptive management response options have collaboratively been developed and if needed, will be implemented. For more information about browse thresholds and response options, please see page 20-26 of the attached Final Record of Decision. The browse thresholds and response options are supported by UDWR and the Utah Wildlife Board. Annual encroachment of conifers is occurring at an exponential rate and now is the time to treat acres on a "grand scale" to allow the aspen ecosystem a chance to recover and restore lost acres. Understory forage will become valuable for existing wild and domestic ungulate animals. Tension between ranchers and sportsmen should decrease over time as more forage is created through vegetation treatments. This project has numerous perennial water bodies/riparian systems and watersheds located across Monroe Mountain. Project polygons from this 3 year proposal will take place at or near Manning Meadows Reservoir (303d), Barney Reservoir, Magelby Reservoir (private), Manning Creek, Barney Creek, as well as tributaries to Monroe Creek and Monkey Fork. Restoring uplands will reduce potential risks from future high severity wildfires by reducing impacts to these water sources and reducing risks of future impairment. If left alone, conifer would continue to dominate over aspen causing an increase of a mono-culturistic pattern which would decrease diversity among vegetation and wildlife species. This project is critical at this point in time to set back this dramatic increase of conifer encroachment and restore as many acres of aspen as possible to preserve diversity across the ecosystem.
Relation To Management Plan:
This action responds to the goals and objectives outlined in the Fishlake Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The desired conditions described in the EIS and the purpose and need for this project are consistent with the Forest's goals, the objectives found in Chapter IV of the LRMP, and the Utah Fire Amendment (USFS 2001). The proposed treatment units are within the following management areas: * 2B -- Rural and Roaded Natural Recreation; * 4A -- Fish Habitat Improvement; * 4B -- Habitat for Management Indicator Species; * 5A -- Big Game Winter Range - Non-forested; * 6B -- Intensive Livestock Management; * 7B -- Wood-Fiber Production - Genetics; and * 9F-- Improved Watershed. Ecosystems are restored and maintained, consistent with land uses and historic fire regimes, through wildland fire use and prescribed fire (Utah Fire Amendment, pg. A-40). The Aspen ROD is consistent with the following plans: (1) Fishlake National Forest Fire Management Plan in restoring fire adapted ecosystems. (2) The "Guidelines for Aspen Restoration on the National Forests in Utah" publication developed by the Utah Forest Aspen Restoration Working Group. (3) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Elk Management Plan. a. Habitat Management Goal: i. Conserve and improve elk habitat throughout the state. This project will help maintain a viable elk herd on the Monroe Unit, Fishlake Unit and Mt. Dutton units. (4) The Greater Plateau Elk Complex Elk Management Plan (2016) lists range improvements in the habitat objectives section. This project specifically addresses the components listed under range improvements in that it enhances forage production and habitat quality through direct range improvements on winter range within the unit. (5) Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Mule Deer Management Plan. This project will help introduce species diversity back into the Monroe Mountain area. A mosaic design is part of the implementation strategy to create a pattern of treated and un-treated acres that will create an increase of biodiversity. (6) Grazing Allotment Plans for 10 different allotments within the overall project boundaries. The amount of forage available to livestock is expected to increase significantly as a result of this project. (7) Utah Wild Turkey Management Plan. Newly treated areas through fire or mechanical means will attract use by wild turkey which are abundant on Monroe Mountain. Insects and new growth will be readily available to support turkey populations. (8) UDWR Wildlife Action Plan. This project is geared toward meeting the goals found within this plan for a variety of wildlife species from large too small. The project is in line with the State's Wildlife Action Plan in that it directly benefits lentic water, lotic water, mountain riparian, and wet meadow habitats. It further directly benefits Bonneville cutthroat trout and boreal toad. (9) National Cohesive Strategy. By means of prescribed fire and mechanical thinning at a landscape scale, the resulting mosaic of early and late successional forests will work toward the goal of restoring and maintaining resilient landscapes. (10) State of Utah Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy. The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project aligns with the mission of the State of Utah's Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy. The project has developed a comprehensive and systematic approach toward reducing the size, intensity and frequency of catastrophic wildland fires on Monroe Mountain through a collaborative process. (11) Monroe Mountain Cove Mountain CWPP a. Goal 1: Minimize the potential wildland fire threat to life safety (Monroe Mountain Cove Mountain CWPP). This project works to achieve Goal 1 of the Monroe Mountain Cove Mountain CWPP by reducing fuel loading and lowering the potential of wildland fire spread across Monroe Mountain. (12) State of Utah Forest Action Plan. The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project addresses all three of the key goals laid out in the Forest Action Plan. (13) State of Utah Boreal Toad Conservation Plan. Boreal toad monitoring that will take place in connection with the Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystem Restoration Project aligns with conservation actions listed in the State of Utah Boreal Toad Conservation Plan. (14) Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Bonneville Cutthroat Trout. This project aligns with conservation actions listed in the Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Bonneville cutthroat trout. a. Southern Bonneville Management Unit management actions: "Fires and floods are a threat to small, isolated BCT populations. These threats are usually associated with fragmented habitat. Small populations potentially are subject to random events that threaten their existence. Such threats decrease with increasing populations, population size, habitat complexity and connectedness." Implementation of this project will reduce the threat of catastrophic fire and the associated negative impacts to Bonneville cutthroat trout on Monroe Mountain. (15) Sevier County Resource Management Plan. This project is congruent with the policies and desired management practices found in Sevier County's Resource Management Plan. (16) Central Utah Fire Management Plan (FMP): Greater use of vegetation management to meet resource management objectives. Hazardous fuels treatments will be used to restore ecosystems, protect human, natural and cultural resources, and reduce the threat of wildfire to communities. The burn plans are reviewed, and each ignition is approved through the Utah State Smoke Management Plan, as described in Utah Rule 307-204. This project will meet the Utah State Smoke Management Plan requirements.
Fire / Fuels:
The remaining untreated portions of Monroe Mountain are at risk of large catastrophic wildfires that could adversely affect entire watersheds. Completed treatments along with planned and future treatments reduce the risk of fire at a landscape level to multiple watersheds and communities. As conifers continue to expand and infill, the risk for large uncharacteristic/catastrophic wildfires will also continue to increase. The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project is being implemented to effectively restore resilient, fire-adapted aspen ecosystems on a landscape-scale and across boundaries by moving the stands toward properly functioning condition in terms of composition (species diversity) and density (crown spacing and fuel loading). In addition, the treatments will improve structural diversity, promote aspen regeneration and recruitment, reduce the hazardous fuel loadings, and reduce the continuity of fuels across the Monroe Mountain landscape; thus, mitigating the risks and damage associated with a high intensity, high severity, uncharacteristic/catastrophic wildfire. Where appropriate, this project will expand opportunities to manage fire for resource benefits and meet Fishlake Land and Resource Management Plan objectives. Over the past decades, spruce dominated stands within this project area have also been significantly impacted by beetle infestations. Most of the large mature spruce have been killed leaving an increased fire hazard in these areas. Timber sales are occurring and continuing to be planned to help mitigate this hazard by targeting the dead standing spruce for commercial sale and preserving the live spruce regeneration in the understory. This upper elevation project compliments completed, and future planned treatments/projects located in the mid to lower elevations. All these projects combined reduce the risk of fire at a landscape level to multiple communities and watersheds across Monroe Mountain while promoting resilient landscapes. Please refer to the "Future Management" section for more details. Wildfires in this mixed conifer fuel type are very hard to contain and suppression costs are extremely high. When wildfires occur, this could result in damage to private property and numerous structures, increased erosion, greater opportunities for noxious weed establishment, impacts to available short-term forage, stream sedimentation, and possible mud slides. This project reduces risks to multiple municipal watersheds. These watersheds include the following: Monroe, Annabella, and Washburnville culinary systems, Annabella Irrigation and Monroe Creek, Cottonwood Creek, and Manning Creek Watersheds. The risk for catastrophic wildfire would be reduced adding a layer of protection from such events to Forest Service owned improvements, and high value areas including Manning Meadows, Monroe Meadows, Long Flat, Bagley Ranch and Magelby Reservoir, all are communities with numerous homes and structures. Cross boundary hazardous fuels treatments in high value areas are occurring in conjunction with the NRCS and Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands (UFFSLs). Mechanical thinning will be occurring on private property in the Magelby, Monroe Meadows and Long Flat areas near the planned USFS prescribed fire and mechanical areas. As mechanical treatments are completed, large scale prescribed fire treatments will commence further reducing risk of fire to these subdivisions. The proposed treatment in conjunction with future planned prescribed fire and mechanical treatments on adjacent USFS lands will reduce risk of fire to this private property with numerous homes and structures. The dominant southwest wind flow in conjunction with associated fire behavior and long-range spotting expected from the mixed conifer/aspen fuel type pose significant wildland fire risk to these areas and values. Most of the planned treatments will be occurring on the southwest side of these values that will create a large, treated buffer that will significantly reduce the risk of fire to these high value areas. Most of this project is within fire regime III -- 35-100+ year frequency and mixed severity (less than 75% of the dominant overstory vegetation replaced) and fire regime IV -- 35-100+ year frequency and high (stand replacement) severity (greater than 75% of the dominant overstory vegetation replaced). The Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) is estimated to be both moderate (FRCC 2) and high (FRCC 3) departure from the central tendency of the natural (historical) regime. The central tendency is a composite estimate of vegetation characteristics (species composition, structural stages, stand age, canopy closure, and mosaic pattern); fuel composition; fire frequency, severity, and pattern; and other associated natural disturbances. Most of this project is in FRCC 3. This project will improve the fire regime condition class to FRCC 1 and FRCC 2.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Project treatments will considerably lessen the risk of catastrophic large-scale high severity fires that could result in long-term watershed degradation. When wildfires occur, increased erosion, greater opportunities for stream sedimentation, and possible mud slides can occur. This project reduces risks to municipal watersheds and culinary water systems that include the following: Monroe, Annabella, and Washburnville (Monroe and Cottonwood Creek Watersheds). This project reduces risks to multiple watersheds across the Monroe Mountain by maintaining watershed function and promoting fire resilient aspen ecosystems. Long-term water quality and watershed health will be maintained or enhanced. By removing conifer via prescribed fire and or mechanical it is anticipated that watershed resilience, hydrologic storage capacity in the regenerated aspen, and water quantity will be enhanced (seeps, springs, bogs--improved). Fire behavior over the last 2 decades have illustrated the potential for large uncontrollable fires across Monroe Mountain with current fuel loadings and conifer stand densities. A large wildfire would likely lead to large flood events. Water quantity could increase but most increase would be associated with storm events or early snow melt. This would likely lead to channel instability and downcutting. Ash, erosion from the fire, and erosion from channel adjustments would decrease water quality by increasing water turbidity and sediment loads. These effects could lead to extirpation of fish populations if the area burned was large enough. Water quantity (and quality) would return to near baseline levels as vegetation recovered over time, but channel adjustments such as down-cutting post-fire would likely have long-term consequences such as reduced areas of riparian habitat and wet meadows, resulting in reduced storage capacity. Barney Lake and Manning Meadows Reservoir are listed for 303d impairments dissolved oxygen and total phosphorus. Treatments during this phase are located adjacent to all these perennial water systems. Project treatments will increase ground cover by promoting increased grasses and forbs. Treatments that improve ground cover will likely reduce sediment transfer into the lower watershed system. Restoring uplands within all these ecological communities will reduce impacts from future wildfires along with reducing risks of future impairment to the watersheds. Sevier County Resource Management Plan: In Sevier County's Water Quality and Hydrology section under Desired Management Practices the statement below supports these types of projects. a. Where water resources on public lands have diminished because grasses have succeeded to pinyon-juniper and other woody vegetation, a vigorous program of mechanical treatments should be applied to promptly remove this woody vegetation and biomass, stimulate the return of the grasses to historic levels, and thereby provide a watershed that maximizes water yield and water quality for livestock, wildlife, and human uses (pg. 24).
Compliance:
The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) analyzed five alternatives and displays the effects in conformance with the Act (40 CFR 1500 to 1508 and FSH 1909.15). The FEIS documents the analysis of environmental effects associated with a suite of restoration treatments on several thousand acres of National Forest System (NFS) lands. The Final Record of Decision (ROD) documents issues presented from public and stakeholders, and local collaborative efforts; in conjunction with the analysis of five alternatives, including a no action alternative. It presents the decision along with rationale and alternatives considered in reaching the decision. All required clearances and archeological surveys have been completed for the entire project.
Methods:
Goals and Objectives will be met by applying prescribed fire in the mixed conifer/aspen areas, allowing incidental burning to occur in adjacent mountain brush/sagebrush areas near planned aspen treatments, and using mechanical treatments in conjunction with traditional timber sales to remove encroaching conifers from aspen areas. This Multi phase/3-year project proposal will involve improving aspen ecosystems on Monroe Mountain by accomplishing the following: (1) Mechanically removing conifer (in house and via contract) from ~450 acres/phase of seral aspen stands on USFS land (Summer/Fall of 2022, 2023 and 2024). (2) Mechanical thinning and commercial timber sales of beetle killed spruce from ~396 acres of spruce and mixed conifer stands. (3) Implement 3 slash line contracts (1 per year/phase) for prescribed fire preparation near critical holding areas and private property on USFS land (Summer 2022, 2023, and 2024). (4) Broadcast prescribed burning ~2,000-3,000 acres/phase of aspen/mixed conifer and approximately 20% incidental burning of mountain brush/sagebrush on USFS Land. The variability in acres depends on availability of appropriate burn windows and weather conditions (Fall/Spring 2022, 2023, and 2024. (5) Pile burning ~600 acres/phase. (Winter 2022, 2023, and 2024). (6) Aerial seeding ~1,000 acres/phase of high intensity prescribed burned areas of this project (Fall 2022, 2023 and 2024). (7) Continuing aquatics and aspen monitoring efforts (Summer 2022, 2023, and 2024). (8) Continuing Range and Weed Control Monitoring (Summer 2022, 2023 and 2024). This project will also involve improving aspen ecosystems on private lands directly adjacent planned USFS treatments and will be contracted by UFFSLs. Private land treatments will include: (1) Mechanically removing conifer, dead and down and dead standing on ~223 acres in the Long Flat Area (Summer and Fall 2023). (2) Mechanically removing conifer, dead and down and dead standing on ~200 acres in the Magleby Area (Summer and Fall 2024). (3) Mechanically removing conifer, dead and down and dead standing ~200 acres back in the Long Flat Area (Summer and Fall 2025). The mechanical thinning on private lands will be completed in conjunction with the NRCS, UFFSLs, and the private landowners though the Joint Chiefs' Landscape Restoration Partnership. The mechanical thinning/piling treatment method on USFS lands will be accomplished primarily through a Good Neighbor Agreement with the UDWR and contract services utilizing forestry type equipment. The next three years of mechanical thinning on USFS land is currently already under contract. Also 3 tracked bobcat skid steer loaders with appropriate forestry attachments operated by force account will also be utilized. Due to ungulate browse thresholds possibly being reached on some treated portions of this project, wildlife slash fences, when feasible may also be constructed. Some biomass fencing is currently under contract to be built during the thinning process. The biomass from the mechanical thinning will be utilized to build an approximate 8' tall fence. Biomass fencing will reduce future costs of constructing traditional net-wire fences and will reduce ungulate browse pressure on newly mechanically treated areas on both private and USFS lands. Prescribed fire implementation will be accomplished utilizing both USFS and inter-agency fire management resources along with aerial helicopter contract services and a Good Neighbor Agreement with UFFSLs that will allow us to utilize and include local volunteer fire departments and state fire resources during implementation. Prescribed fire treatments will be implemented utilizing aerial and/or hand ignition techniques targeting spruce/fir, mixed conifer, and seral aspen with mosaic burn patterns and mixed burn severities as an objective. Prescribed burn reseeding will generally occur after treatment and will be focused on high intensity burn areas. We will utilize contract services to aerial seed. Piles as a result of previous mechanical treatments are planned to be burned approx. 1 year after they have been cut to allow for curing. This will be accomplished by force account seasonal firefighters. If needed, burn pile scars will be reseeded to minimize establishment of noxious weeds. As part of this project aspen monitoring is required and needed to determine if new aspen regeneration is successfully recruiting; a sufficient number of aspen sprouts are reaching 6 feet and taller. As a part of this project, the District will monitor boreal toads before, during, and after project implementation. Monitoring will be done to ensure project design features are implemented as designed, work as intended and are effective, and that site-specific findings of toad use areas, timing, etc. are incorporated into implementation actions. This monitoring will help ensure that boreal toad impacts are minimized. (See monitoring section for more details)
Monitoring:
Approximately 120 to 140 long-term aspen transects will be used to monitor status and trend of aspen following implementation. Monitoring is being done in conjunction and coordinated with aspen monitoring/research currently being done on Monroe Mountain by Dr. Sam St. Clair from Brigham Young University. Monitoring will address aspen regeneration/recruitment and understory conditions. Approximately 90 of these transects have already been established and are currently being monitored. To compliment this monitoring, 11 exclosures have also already been built at various locations across Monroe Mountain. See Final Record of Decision for additional information about monitoring. As a part of this project, the District will monitor boreal toads before, during, and after project implementation. Monitoring will be done to ensure project design features are implemented as designed, work as intended and are effective, and that site-specific findings of toad use areas, timing, etc. are incorporated into implementation actions. This monitoring will help ensure that boreal toad impacts are minimized. Monitoring will also include breeding site monitoring to document use and relative densities of populations. Aquatics monitoring plans in 2018 were updated and revised in consideration of some of the monitoring findings and developments from summer 2016 and 2017 and meetings with UDWR in March and October of 2017. Radio-tracking of boreal toads was not pursued from 2018 - 2021. Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags will continue to be used at 6 main breeding zones. Finally, more proactive boreal toad habitat and population restoration work will begin. If boreal toad egg strands are found on Monroe in 2022, a portion may be taken into captivity to be raised to toadlets for release in the fall. Experimental/temporary key habitat protection measures and other habitat improvement projects will be implemented from Phase 3 and later stages of the Monroe project. These measures include boreal toad breeding site fencing maintenance and beaver dam analogue installations in key boreal toad historic breeding/use habitat. In addition, the District will monitor fish populations, streamflow, water turbidity, basic water chemistry, and aquatic macroinvertebrates one time before treatments are implemented if they have not been monitored in the last five years. Fish populations, streamflow, water turbidity, basic water chemistry, and aquatic macroinvertebrates will also be monitored immediately following project implementation and one final time three to five years following project implementation. Lake water quality (basic water chemistry, nutrient levels, and secchi disk depths) will also be monitored from fish supporting lakes in the project area before project implementation in that watershed, during project implementation, and three to five years following project implementation. Monitoring will be conducted monthly during the summer season from approximately May/June through Sept/October. The District will repeat hydrological channel monitoring stations (cross-sections, longitudinal profiles, and photo points) that were established in or about 2001 on Manning Creek, Barney Creek, Dry Canyon, and Koosharem Creek. These stations will be resampled one time before treatments are implemented, immediately following project implementation, and a final time three to five years following project implementation. Throughout implementation of this project elk, deer, owls and goshawks will also continue to be monitored annually (TESP and MIS). The District Wildlife staff will work closely with local UDWR biologists to monitor wildlife utilization on aspen regeneration. In the event established thresholds markers are exceeded conferencing will occur to enact protocol measures to prevent continued over-utilization of aspen sprouting. Photo plots combined with camera traps will be established to monitor results. California Condor: This project lies south of I-70 and is therefore within the 10j experimental non-essential area for the California condor. We will monitor to learn if any of these raptor species are to show up on Monroe Mountain. Multiple fuels and prescribed fire monitoring plots have been established with the prescribed fire portions of the project. Plots will be visited post treatments 1 year, 3 year, and 5 years to monitor fuels and tree mortality. This will be accomplished by the Forest Service SCA Monitoring Crew. Invasive and noxious weeds are not known to occur in the treatment areas; however, treatment areas will be monitored post-implementation. If noxious and/or invasive weeds are detected, the District will take the appropriate actions to control spread and eliminate the noxious and/or invasive weeds from the treatment areas. Not only will treatments enhance habitat for big game, but increased diversity will also benefit small game, raptors, rabbits, turkey, as well as predator species in the treatment areas. Deer and elk are utilizing the treatment areas that have been burned, cut, seeded and/or recently masticated. 2020 post-season deer numbers are positive and area specific (not indicative of the unit as a whole) which would lead us to believe that vegetation projects on summer, transition and winter range are helping keep deer healthier than other parts of the range.
Partners:
The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project is a result of several years of planning and collaboration among interested parties, groups and organizations, and Federal, State and local government agencies. In January 2010, the Utah Forest Aspen Restoration Working Group (UFRWG) finalized the 2010 Guidelines for Aspen Restoration on the National Forests in Utah (UFRWG 2010). As part of this effort, the UFRWG submitted a call for project proposals that could effectively test the newly created guidelines. The Fishlake National Forest submitted the Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project to the UFRWG for their consideration. The proposal was accepted and in April 2011 the Monroe Mountain Working Group (MMWG) was formed to provide recommendations and feedback to the District as the project was being developed. From May 2011 through December 2015 the Richfield Ranger District met with the MMWG almost monthly developing and working on this project. These meetings were open to the public to provide information, ask and answer questions and discuss the proposed action and alternatives. The MMWG consist of the following stakeholders: Utah Cattlemen's Association; Utah Woolgrowers Association; Utah State University Extension; Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Trout Unlimited; Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR); Piute County Commission; Sevier County Commission; Utah Department of Agriculture and Food; Utah Farm Bureau; Rocky Mountain Research Station; Grand Canyon Trust; Western Aspen Alliance; and Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands. The Utah Department of Wildlife Resources was a cooperating agency for the Monroe Aspen EIS and Final Record of Decision. The Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project was selected by the Joint Chiefs' Landscape Restoration Partnership with NRCS and USFS for a second time for funding. Through this Joint Chiefs' Partnership with NRCS along with partnership with UFFSLs and multiple private landowners, treatments are also occurring on private lands located on Monroe Mountain in conjunction with treatments occurring on lands managed by the Richfield Ranger District. Coordination meetings are taking place between USFS, UFFSLs and UDWR to plan collaboratively future treatments that will mutually benefit all agencies along with promoting landscape-level restoration. Multiple partnership agreements are in place to assist in implementation of this project that include: (1) A Good Neighbor Agreement with UFFSLs that will allow us to utilize and include local volunteer fire departments and state fire resources during prescribed fire planning and implementation; (2) A Good Neighbor Agreement with UDWR that promotes the UDWR to be involved with planning and implementation; (3) An interagency agreement with the BLM. This will allow for an interagency effort during implementation of the prescribed fire along with utilizing BLM work force during portions of the mechanical implementation; and (4) The Richfield Ranger District is partnered with the Fire and Smoke Modeling Evaluation Experiment (FASMEE) research group that have been involved during multiple prescribed fire activities on the Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project. FASMEE is a multi-agency effort to provide advanced measurements necessary to evaluate and advance operationally used fire and smoke modeling systems and their underlying scientific models. The field campaign began spring 2019 during Phase 4 of this project and has continued most recently this past Fall 2020 during Phase 5 implementation. Portions of FASMEE related research are planned to be conducted on future large operational prescribed fires during this phase of the project along with future phases. In 2017, the Six County Association of Governments had their annual natural resources tour on Monroe Mountain. Governor Herbert also attended for part of the day. Throughout the day this project area and other project areas on the Monroe were visited. Those in attendance expressed their support for this project and doing active management. Numerous other tours have occurred on Monroe Mountain each year since then with most recently five tours during 2020. These tours are continually focused on group engagement and dialogue while showing completed treatments across the mountain and associated successes of implementing at a landscape/ecological level utilizing adaptive management.
Future Management:
FUTURE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING: Treatment sequencing follows a Monroe Mountain wide 10-year implementation plan and is primarily based on the current distribution of wild browsers on Monroe Mountain. Mechanical and prescribed fire treatments have been occurring and are now finished in the southerly portion of the project area where visually, current browse pressures on aspen appear to be less than the northerly and central portions of the project area. Since treatments in the southern area mostly finished, treatments in the northerly portion of the project have begun. Following treatments in the northern area, treatments in the central portion of the project area will be initiated next. Browse pressures in the north appear to be higher than what is occurring in the south, but less than the central portion of the project area. By generally sequencing the project in this order, browse pressure may be more directed away from newly treated areas; this is expected to increase the probability of regenerating aspen to reach 6 feet tall after treatment. As treatments occur in areas adjacent to Manning Meadows Reservoir and Barney Lake, these select areas will be fenced to exclude both wildlife and livestock browsing. With fencing, the amount of time needed to acquire a minimum of 1,000 aspen saplings per acre is expected to be quicker. Other vegetation and cover types are also expected to benefit from fencing. The District will eventually construct approximately 7.2 miles (633 acres) of temporary fence, split into 3 areas, located in the Manning Meadows Reservoir and Barney Lake areas. The first area has been treated and fencing is planned to be completed the summer of 2022 as part of the recent phase 6. Maintenance of the temporary fences will occur for 3-5 years until the aspen shoots are greater than 6 feet tall, after which the fence will be removed. Additionally, select areas of planned future mechanical treatments will have slash fencing constructed as part of the contract. Mechanical treatments will occur in areas adjacent to private lands, areas adjacent to Northern goshawk territories, and areas within/adjacent to Boreal toad and Bonneville cutthroat trout habitat. These aspen, spruce/fir, and mixed conifer areas will be mechanically treated first within each sequence area (southern, northern, and central). Implementing these mechanical treatments will help reduce the risk of impacts from planned future prescribed fire to private property, Northern goshawk, Boreal toad, and Bonneville cutthroat trout. Increased pace and scale of restoration type projects in this area is currently underway. Multiple projects have been and are currently being implemented and more are being planned on Monroe Mountain. This 3-year phase of the project directly coordinates at a watershed and landscape level with the recently implemented Glenwood Collaboration Project and the planned Thompson Basin Pinyon and Juniper Projects that are located on the northwest side of Monroe Mountain in the lower elevations below the prescribed fire portions of this phase of the project. Both PJ projects cover a good portion of the mid to lower elevations located on the northwest side of the Monroe Mountain, and compliment completed and planned BLM projects in the same area. These projects are planned to continue over the next 2-3 years in conjunction with the Forest Pinyon and Juniper Project and planned BLM and state projects as well. These actions are an effort to disperse browse pressure of both wild and domestic ungulates and improve watershed health across the entire Monroe Mountain and BLM treatments occurring in the valleys surrounding the mountain. With the reduced risks to private property and improvements that have already occurred and planned to occur over the next 3 years as a result of this project, future planned prescribed fire within numerous acres can now be implemented, and management of naturally caused fires to have now become possible within thousands of acres across Monroe Mountain that would not have been available otherwise. This project will continue to improve the ability to allow fire to play greatest feasible natural role in the environment, through the maintaining of a diverse mosaic of seral aspen stages into the future. Mechanical treatments may also be considered to maintain aspen ecosystems on the landscape. Invasive and noxious weeds are not known to occur in the treatment areas; however, treatment areas will be monitored post-implementation. If noxious and/or invasive weeds are detected, the District will take the appropriate actions to control spread and eliminate the noxious and/or invasive weeds from the treatment areas. FUTURE RANGE MANGAGEMENT: As habitat is improved for ungulates (deer, elk, cattle, sheep) and additional forage becomes available, the Fishlake National Forest expects the flexibility and management of ungulates will improve. Maintaining healthy populations of wildlife while also responding to the needs of livestock permittees is expected to become easier. Impacts to livestock grazing permit holders have been and will continue to be minimized using herding and temporary electric fences so that treatment areas and/or stable aspen stands can be temporarily rested while non-treatment areas can continue to be grazed. The WRI funded a water development/fencing project to help distribute livestock and provide additional flexibility to move livestock to accommodate temporary rest following treatments. The infrastructure for that project has been installed and our Aspen Project has been benefiting from the water infrastructure project for the past few years. Post implementation, we've been able to temporary rest areas from livestock use without reducing livestock numbers or season of use. and we've mostly been able to maintain livestock numbers and season of use (due to drought, the authorized season of use was reduced in 2020). The water development/fence project has been a great success and will continue to be of benefit for the Aspen Project. FUTURE ADAPTIVE MANAGMENT: BYU continues to monitor aspen browse. To date we are seeing positive aspen results (especially in the prescribed fire portions) Aspen browse thresholds and adaptive management response options have been developed and will be implemented to help ensure new regenerating aspen successfully recruit (become 6 feet or taller). To assist this effort, extensive aspen monitoring by Dr. Sam St. Clair has occurred and is contracted to continue. BYU is planning to study how seasonality and drought might affect aspen treatments in the future. As additional areas continue to get treated, our plan is to continue implementing the browse thresholds and if thresholds are exceeded, in coordination with the MMWG, implement a suit of adaptive management response options. Our goal is to ensure an adequate amount of aspen regeneration successfully recruits and mosaic treatment patterns are desired. Adaptive management is approved in the Aspen ROD. Many tools have been analyzed in the NEPA planning process to allow a full suite of methods to occur in the future. The District will ensure, if needed, the temporary resting of treatment areas, herding, and electric fences are incorporated into Annual Operating Instructions. These actions will help ensure that permittees are in the communication loop and will give them enough time to plan for the resources they need to continue their operations. For example, in 2019 and 2020 the entire Rock Springs Allotment was rested from livestock grazing. With no reductions in 2019, these livestock were able to temporarily graze a different area on Monroe Mountain. With several treatments occurring in 2016-2021, with the exception of 2020, livestock permittees were still able to keep their full livestock numbers and season of use on Monroe Mountain. If browse thresholds are reached, a suite of adaptive management response options can be implemented as described in the Final Aspen Record of Decision. The browse thresholds and response options are included in this project to ensure an adequate amount of aspen regeneration successfully recruits thus moving toward desired conditions that benefit all ungulates on Monroe Mountain. The browse thresholds and adaptive management response options are supported by the MMWG and the Utah Wildlife Board.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
PUBLIC and ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY: As part of this project, traditional timber sales have been occurring and are planned to continue throughout project implementation. Efforts are being made to commercially sale merchantable timber (primarily spruce) during this phase of implementation by targeting the dead standing spruce for commercial sale and preserving the live spruce regeneration in the understory. This will allow for sustainable forestry management and timber production in the future. In 2020 ~897 acres of beetle killed spruce were commercially cut and sold on the north end of Monroe Mountain in the Cove area. During past phases, approx. 482 acres of beetle killed dead spruce were cut and processed...Afterword's, the spruce log decks with an estimated 2,443 CCF was sold. Last phase this project we completed another commercial timber sale of 291 acres with an estimated 4,931 CCF of timber sold. More acres are planned to be prepared for future timber sales. All these completed timber sales are being purchased by local Utah based timber companies. Spruce from Monroe Mountain is being utilized by a log home building company located in Gunnison Utah. Supplying a consistent timber product with the associated consistent economic benefits for these small local companies is planned to continue as part of this project. Some treated areas may be re-planted as deemed appropriate by the District Timber Staff. Some fir dominated areas that were prescribed fire treated during this project are currently in the process of being replanted with merchantable timber species such as Spruce and Douglas Fir. These areas will be managed for the long-term supply of timber products. District Timber staff have been promoting commercial biomass sales of normally non merchantable timber such as white and sub-alpine fir to local private companies to be processed into wood chips. Some interest is starting to be shown and hopefully a market niche will be developed and more of the biomass produced from the mechanical portions of this project will be able to be utilized. Numerous contracts have been awarded to private companies to complete treatments on Monroe Mountain. Multiple other contracts are planned in the future. These contracts provide economic benefits to the local communities by helping to sustain employment for folks working for the private companies which are mostly local Utah based companies. Monroe Mountain is a very popular hunting unit for big game, fishing (a variety of fish species), camping, wildlife viewing, hiking, snowmobiling, private land ownership, wild turkeys and a variety of upland game and non-game species. Aspen restoration will improve transition and summer ranges that will benefit wildlife along with improving water quality and reducing risk to necessary fish habitat and watersheds. This project will promote sustainability for a variety of sportsmen and sportswomen along with providing more hunting and fishing opportunities for future generations. Miles of hiking and ATV trails exist across Monroe Mountain. With the Sevier County ATV Jamboree each year, riders from across the country enjoy riding trails in this area and enjoy camping and recreating. Aspen restoration across the mountain will promote a renewed resilient beautiful sustainable forest that will be enjoyed by future generations. Vegetation treatments that encourage aspen regeneration on spring and summer range will continue to provide quality deer fawning and elk calving habitat. A productive understory combined with some dead and down trees is optimal habitat for big game birthing. It is imperative that additional acres are treated to benefit big game and livestock body conditions at the end of summer and fall. Productive forage on the range will help livestock end-of-season weight gains be optimized. This project will continue to provide those opportunities to ungulate animals by improving the health and integrity of the overall ecosystem. A wide variety of species inhabit the aspen-spruce-fir ecosystem of Monroe Mtn. FORAGE PRODUCTION or IMPROVED DISTRIBUTION: Aspen ecosystems are rich in species of grasses, forbs, and animals; especially in comparison to associated coniferous forest types. The high value of the aspen ecosystem type as a forage resource for livestock and as forage and cover for wildlife increases with the implementation of this project. Through both the mechanical thinning and prescribed fire treatments, conifer encroachment is reduced, and aspen regeneration/recruitment is promoted. This in return moves aspen ecosystems on the Monroe Mountain on a trajectory toward accomplishing desired conditions thus improving aspen ecosystems. The amount of forage and total area available for livestock grazing is expected to increase significantly as a result of this project. With the removal of conifer, the amount of usable grasses and forbs in the aspen understory is expected to increase significantly. By thinning and or burning the overgrown mixed conifer areas, the amount of usable area to graze will also increase as a result of this project. With increased forage livestock distribution and management is expected to improve. Many areas that are currently unproductive due to overgrowth will soon become desirable for future uses by livestock. Livestock numbers on Monroe Mountain have been fairly constant for the past 50 years; however, during that timeframe with subalpine fir encroachment into aspen stands and PJ encroachment into sagebrush/grass/forb areas the amount of forage available to ungulates has decreased significantly. Healthy aspen stands provide 800-1,000 pounds of forage per acre and with conifer encroachment forage decreases to 0-50 pounds per acre. In treatments areas we are seeing significant increases in forage. This restored forage is and will continue to provide better conditions for ungulates already on Monroe Mountain and is restoring forage that has been declining for the past century. This restored forage in the aspen will help improve ungulate distribution and we anticipate benefits in the adjacent community types as distribution is improved. This increased forage also will help during drought years and help maintain forage for a longer period of time into the grazing season. Having the season of use or livestock numbers temporary reduced during drought years is constantly a concern for permittees. With increased forage, our ability to maintain livestock numbers and season of use (while also maintaining compliance with the grazing standards and guidelines outlined in the Fishlake Land and Resource Management Plan) during the drought years becomes easier. OTHER SUSTAINABLE USES of NATURAL RESOURCES: This phase of the project protects and enhances municipal drinking water systems and watersheds for communities located in the Sevier Valley that provide sustainable clean drinking water to numerous residents. Refer to the "Fire/Fuels" section for more details.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$3,553,342.00 $611,560.00 $4,164,902.00 $1,283,000.00 $5,447,902.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
NEPA Completion of the Monroe Mountain Aspen Ecosystems Restoration Project Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Total NEPA costs are split between various phases over 10 years $0.00 $0.00 $405,000.00 2016
Other Phase 7: Engines/firefighters nd OT for broadcast prescribed fire implementation (~3,500-5,400 acres) @ $83-$129 an acre, and pile burning (~1,400 acres). Funded in part by Fishlake NF Fuels Funding $70,000.00 $0.00 $62,000.00 2023
Other Phase 8: Engines/firefighters nd OT for broadcast prescribed fire implementation (~3,500-5,400 acres) @ $83-$129 an acre, and pile burning (~1,400 acres). Funded in full by Fishlake NF Fuels Funding $0.00 $0.00 $120,000.00 2024
Other Phase 9: Engines/firefighters nd OT for broadcast prescribed fire implementation (~3,500-5,400 acres) @ $83-$129 an acre, and pile burning (~1,400 acres). Funded in part by Fishlake NF Fuels Funding $0.00 $0.00 $120,000.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Phase 7: Equipment maintenance, fuel and supplies for mechanical implementation, $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2023
Materials and Supplies Phase 8: Equipment maintenance, fuel and supplies for mechanical implementation, $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2024
Materials and Supplies Phase 9: Equipment maintenance, fuel and supplies for mechanical implementation, $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 7: Contract administration for mechanical contracts and prescribed fire preparation and implementation. $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 8: Contract administration for mechanical contracts and prescribed fire preparation and implementation. $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2024
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 9: Contract administration for mechanical contracts and prescribed fire preparation and implementation. $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Phase 7: Helicopter and supplies/fuel for aerial ignition & bucket work for prescribed fire implementation. $200,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Phase 8: Helicopter and supplies/fuel for aerial ignition & bucket work for prescribed fire implementation. $225,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Contractual Services Phase 9: Helicopter and supplies/fuel for aerial ignition & bucket work for prescribed fire implementation. $81,926.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Other Phase 7: SCA Fuels Monitoring $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2023
Other Phase 8: SCA Fuels Monitoring $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2024
Other Phase 9: SCA Fuels Monitoring $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2025
Seed (GBRC) Phase 7: Seed for approximately 1,000 acres post prescribed fire treatment ($70.40/acre). $70,395.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Seed (GBRC) Phase 8: Seed for approximately 1,000 acres post prescribed fire treatment ($55.90/acre). $70,395.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Seed (GBRC) Phase 9: Seed for approximately 1,000 acres post prescribed fire treatment ($55.90/acre). $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Other Phase 7: BLM fuels agreement for interagency prescribed fire assistance $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2023
Other Phase 8: BLM fuels agreement for interagency prescribed fire assistance $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2024
Other Phase 9: BLM fuels agreement for interagency prescribed fire assistance $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Phase 7: Slash Line Contract for Prescribed fire preparation $85,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Phase 8: Slash Line Contract for Prescribed fire preparation $90,640.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Contractual Services Phase 9: Slash Line Contract for Prescribed fire preparation $320,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services Phase 7: Aerial Seeding Contract for 1,000 acres @ $12/acre $12,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Phase 8: Aerial Seeding Contract for 1,000 acres @ $12/acre $12,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Contractual Services Phase 9: Aerial Seeding Contract for 1,000 acres @ $12/acre $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Phase 7: Rx logistical support for fuel trucks, PSD, drip torch fuel, porta potties, etc. $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Materials and Supplies Phase 8: Rx logistical support for fuel trucks, PSD, drip torch fuel, porta potties, etc. $35,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Materials and Supplies Phase 9: Rx logistical support for fuel trucks, PSD, drip torch fuel, porta potties, etc. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Other Phase 7: UFFSLs Good Neighbor Agreement for Prescribed fire assistance. $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 2023
Other Phase 8: UFFSLs Good Neighbor Agreement for Prescribed fire assistance. $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 2024
Other Phase 9: UFFSLs Good Neighbor Agreement for Prescribed fire assistance. $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 2025
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 7: Wildlife/ Range/ Weed monitoring and supplies for this phase and past phases of the project. $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 8: Wildlife/ Range/ Weed monitoring and supplies for this phase and past phases of the project. $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 9: Wildlife/ Range/ Weed monitoring and supplies for this phase and past phases of the project. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Stevens funding used to purchase materials and supplies (Phases 7-9) $0.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services Stevens funding mechanical thinning contract on ~100 acres on Robison Trust Lands Private property @ $1,500/acre $0.00 $150,000.00 $0.00 2023
Archaeological Clearance 635 private acres will cover Phases 7-9 of the project @ 35.00 per acre $22,225.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Stevens Funding for Contractor administration Permanent FFSL Employee's (Phase 7) $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Stevens Funding for Contractor administration Permanent FFSL Employee's (Phase 8) $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2024
Personal Services (permanent employee) Stevens Funding for Contractor administration Permanent FFSL Employee's (Phase 9) $0.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 2025
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Stevens Funding FFSL Seasonal Employees (Phase 7) $0.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Stevens Funding FFSL Seasonal Employees (Phase 8) $0.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2024
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Stevens Funding FFSL Seasonal Employees (Phase 9) $0.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2025
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 7: Seasonal employees to assist in boreal toad occupancy modeling monitoring for 2 weeks and data entry/analysis. $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 8: Seasonal employees to assist in boreal toad occupancy modeling monitoring for 2 weeks and data entry/analysis. $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 9: Seasonal employees to assist in boreal toad occupancy modeling monitoring for 2 weeks and data entry/analysis. $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 7: Biologist project planning, oversight, and administration for required monitoring of boreal toads, Bonneville cutthroat trout, and aquatic stream habitat. FS in-kind portion for two biologists estimated at $19,000, UDWR portion at $5,000. $0.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 8: Biologist project planning, oversight, and administration for required monitoring of boreal toads, Bonneville cutthroat trout, and aquatic stream habitat. FS in-kind portion for two biologists estimated at $19,000, UDWR portion at $5,000. $0.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 2024
Other Administrative costs Paid out of Stevens funding for Phases 7-9. $0.00 $24,000.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services Project paid through NRCS Equip to treat acres in the Magleby private property area. $0.00 $317,560.00 $0.00 2021
Contractual Services Phase 7: Utah FFSL to contract mechanical treatment Long Flat contracted 223 acres @ 1500 per acre $334,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Phase 8: Utah FFSL to contract mechanical treatment on Magleby private land 70 acres Reservoir Hill and 142 acres middle ridge area. Total 212 planned acres @ $1500 per acre. $318,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Contractual Services Phase 9: Utah FFSL to contract mechanical treatment In Long Flat private land 200 acres planned @ $1500 per acre. $300,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services Forest Service Joint Chiefs Funding going toward 18% increase on Mechanical 5 year Contract, range improvement fencing and cone collection contracts through GNA. $452,292.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Equipment Purchase Phase 7: PIT tags, misc. supplies, fish sampling gear servicing or upgrade, lake water sampling gear. $4,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Equipment Purchase Phase 8: PIT tags, misc. supplies, fish sampling gear servicing or upgrade, lake water sampling gear. $4,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Equipment Purchase Phase 9: PIT tags, misc. supplies, fish sampling gear servicing or upgrade, lake water sampling gear. $4,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 7: Seasonal employees to conduct mandatory boreal toad monitoring starting with PIT tagging, BCT lake surveys, aquatic stream surveys. FS and DWR other seasonal in kind assistance estimated at $12,000 $18,000.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 2023
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 8: Seasonal employees to conduct mandatory boreal toad monitoring starting with PIT tagging, BCT lake surveys, aquatic stream surveys. FS and DWR other seasonal in kind assistance estimated at $12,000. $18,000.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 2024
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Phase 9: Seasonal employees to conduct mandatory boreal toad monitoring starting with PIT tagging, BCT lake surveys, aquatic stream surveys. FS and DWR other seasonal in kind assistance estimated at $12,000. $18,000.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Phase 7: Laboratory analysis of aquatic macroinvertebrate samples for required monitoring. Field data in-kind personnel collection costs included in other budget lines, 10 samples at approximately $300/sample. $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Phase 8: Laboratory analysis of aquatic macroinvertebrate samples for required monitoring. Field data in-kind personnel collection costs included in other budget lines, 10 samples at approximately $300/sample. $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Contractual Services Phase 9: Laboratory analysis of aquatic macroinvertebrate samples for required monitoring. Field data in-kind personnel collection costs included in other budget lines, 10 samples at approximately $300/sample. $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) Phase 9: Biologist project planning, oversight, and administration for required monitoring of boreal toads, Bonneville cutthroat trout, and aquatic stream habitat. FS in-kind portion for two biologists estimated at $19,000, UDWR portion at $5,000. $0.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Range Fencing Contracts $675,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Equipment Rental/Use UFFSLs Prescribed Fire assistance for use of VFD and State engines and resources $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$2,209,493.37 $1,063,852.00 $3,273,345.37 $1,284,989.95 $4,558,335.32
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
United States Forest Service (USFS) USFS Fishlake NF Funding - The total amount of NEPA cost is split between the various phases $0.00 $0.00 $405,000.00 2016
Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands (FFSL) UFFSLs Monroe Mountain Stevens Funding contribution to project smf Inkind $0.00 $294,000.00 $0.00 2023
NRCS-Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Funds provided by land owner matching project in Magleby Area through NRCS. $0.00 $317,560.00 $0.00 2023
United States Forest Service (USFS) Phase 7: Forest Service In Kind Funding $0.00 $0.00 $254,000.00 2023
United States Forest Service (USFS) Phase 8: Forest Service In Kind Funding $0.00 $0.00 $312,000.00 2024
United States Forest Service (USFS) Phase 9: Forest Service In Kind Funding $0.00 $0.00 $312,000.00 2025
United States Forest Service (USFS) USFS Joint Chiefs Funding going toward project $0.00 $452,292.00 $0.00 2023
Federal Aid (PR) P651 $8,956.76 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation (WSF) S022 $141.43 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $2,121.53 $0.00 $0.00 2023
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) S024 $141.43 $0.00 $0.00 2023
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $994.40 2024
Habitat Council Account QHCR Phases 7 request $65,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Safari Club International (SCI) S026 $141.43 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $1,414.34 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Utah Archery Association (UAA) S052 $141.43 $0.00 $0.00 2023
RMEF banquet funds S055 $565.75 $0.00 $0.00 2023
DNR Watershed U004 $494,895.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
United States Forest Service (USFS) A185 Fence contract - E4Z236A12F $675,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
DWR-WRI Project Admin In-Kind $0.00 $0.00 $995.55 2023
Federal Aid (PR) P651 $97,657.60 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation (WSF) S022 $3,530.56 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $52,851.50 $0.00 $0.00 2024
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) S024 $3,530.56 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Safari Club International (SCI) S026 $3,530.56 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $35,241.45 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Utah Archery Association (UAA) S052 $3,530.56 $0.00 $0.00 2024
RMEF banquet funds S055 $19,434.25 $0.00 $0.00 2024
DNR Watershed U004 $660,629.59 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Federal Aid (PR) P651 $37,021.03 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation (WSF) S022 $1,328.01 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $20,026.97 $0.00 $0.00 2025
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) S024 $1,328.01 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Safari Club International (SCI) S026 $1,328.01 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $13,344.21 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Utah Archery Association (UAA) S052 $1,328.01 $0.00 $0.00 2025
RMEF banquet funds S055 $5,333.39 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Bald Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Incidental Poisoning Low
Black Bear
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Blue Grouse
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Bobcat
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Bonneville Cutthroat Trout N4 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Cougar
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Flammulated Owl N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Golden Eagle N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Cottontail R2
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) Low
Rainbow Trout R5
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Ruffed Grouse R2
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Snowshoe Hare R4
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Western Toad N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Low
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Aspen-Conifer
Threat Impact
Problematic Insects – Native High
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Fire and Fire Suppression Medium
Project Comments
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clare Poulsen
Looking at the seed mix It has only three grasses if you want to benefit some of the species you have listed I think some forbs would be important to seed too.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Kreig Rasmussen
Thank you. I have revisited the seed mix and added a few forbs. Thanks.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
I think you might officially win for the longest finance page in WRI history.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Kelly Cornwall
Thanks for your comment Clint...What do we win? :)
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Maybe you'll win the most money from a WRI proposal.
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Kelly, I presume bobcat and cougar are supposed to benefit as a result of future increased deer herds? Can we bank on that? I can scare up a flammulated owl almost anywhere I go. They are happy in conifer with dense understory. How is conversion to aspen going to be better for them? Also, woodpeckers (specifically three-toed) seem to be fairly common on Monore Mountain. What are you plans for the fire-killed trees already up there and how will your proposed actions benefit (or not be detrimental to) this group? Do you want me to mention pinyon jays, as I have with everyone else? Keith
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Kreig Rasmussen
Flammulated owl surveys we have conducted specific to Monroe Mountain have taught us that on that mountain we can expect them to be oriented almost a large percent of the time in Douglas fir specific habitat. Wildlife direction to our fuels and timber folks is to try to avoid Douglas fir stands. Douglas fir stands on Monroe Mt. seem to be specific to rockier ridge lines and smaller is size. We are also hoping the habitat improvement work we are doing at all elevations on our district will help improve our diminished deer herds. Habitat improvements at all elevations and at the scale we are treating should help create an improved healthier ecosystem for all species of wildlife over time. Fire killed trees in our treatments are a high percentage of sub-alpine fir with an occasional few acres of Engleman Spruce (more 3-toed preferred). We do have some harvesting going on in the north slope area of Monroe Mountain that has an active population of 3 toed woodpecker. We know we are currently affecting acres that might be ideal right now for some species but left un-treated these acres will continue to become a mono culture for vegetation as well as wildlife species in the future. These treatments will re-set the ecosystem and allow a more diverse vegetative and wildlife community for future decades and centuries.
Comment 02/04/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Kelly, Impressive amount of work you guys have completed up there. As usual great cross boundary stuff. A few thoughts. I will let Alison and Daniel deal with the financing, but I was always under the impression UWRI was one year funding which makes it hard to rank three phases at once. Kreig's white paper on telemetry won't download, could you guys try to upload it again or email it to me? Not questioning the long-term benefits of aspen regen versus conifer in terms of ground cover, or that burning it your way versus mother nature's way probably has less impact, but wondering what you have seen in terms of runoff and recovery time from the other 33,000 acres of treatment and whether there may be short-term negative impacts to the TMDL in Manning, and if so anything implementation adjustments you can do to avoid? Has the Monroe Mountain Working Group had any involvement on the implementation side? Thanks for the great proposal.
Comment 02/08/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Jason Kling
Consolidating three years of funding into one proposal was done in consultation with Tyler Thompson. We thought that compiling a proposal that includes Phases 7, 8, and 9 would be easier and more efficient for the proposer as well as the ranking committee; we now have one proposal to submit, review, and rank vs three proposals to submit, review, and rank. The Monroe Mountain Working Group has been mostly involved with monitoring efforts and informing what adaptive management adjustments are needed or not needed. I'll ask Kreig to provide the telemetry paper. Thanks.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
One question: What cultural surveys and tribal consultation are being/have been conducted for this project?
Comment 02/08/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Jason Kling
For this project, prior to signing the Record of Decision, all the tribal and SHPO concurrence were completed. All the cultural surveys were completed prior to signing the ROD.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
11051 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
11053 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
11055 Terrestrial Treatment Area Prescribed fire Prescribed fire
11056 Terrestrial Treatment Area Prescribed fire Prescribed fire
11124 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (commercial)
11125 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (commercial)
11190 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
11191 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
11192 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
11193 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
13918 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
13919 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
14127 Terrestrial Treatment Area Forestry practices Thinning (non-commercial)
Project Map
Project Map