East Bear Lake Range And Stream Improvements - Phase II
Project ID: 6021
Status: Current
Fiscal Year: 2025
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Shane Hill
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Northern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Northern
Description:
To remove phase I encroaching juniper from valuable sage brush and mahogany habitats through lop and scatter methods. Construct Zeedyk structures and BDA's in two drainages to enhance wet meadow habitat and increase fish habitat. Replace a fish-impassable road crossing culvert with a bridge (bottomless arch culvert) to reconnect fish passage to 10 miles of stream to Bear Lake.
Location:
East of Bear Lake in the South Eden and North Eden Creek drainages.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The project area is identified as important habitat for sage-grouse and critical winter/spring habitat for big game that supports migratory deer from UT, ID and WY. The goal of this project is to maintain native understory vegetation, primarily the shrub species. Thinning treatments in these stands are needed to prevent further juniper encroachment. Encroachment severity ranges from Phase 1 to 3, though is still primarily Phase 1. Removal of junipers should help through reduced soil moisture competition for water, improved snowmelt infiltration and reduce hazardous fuel loads which lessens the potential for a catastrophic fire event and resulting habitat loss. Multiple phases will be required to treat this large area. This is phase II of the project. The North Cisco Beach Road culvert crossing of North Eden Creek consists of a 90-foot long culvert at a 3% gradient with about a three-foot drop at its outlet. This culvert prevents the movement and migration of fishes to about 10 miles of stream habitat upstream. This passage problem limits the available spawning and early rearing of fish from Bear Lake such as Bonneville Cutthroat Trout.
Objectives:
The objective of this project is to maintain the existing native plant communities that are important for sage grouse, mule deer, moose, pronghorn, and elk by removing encroaching PJ trees. In addition, stream habitat will be reconnected on North Eden Creek and restored on South Eden Creek. Specific Objectives: -Remove phase I juniper through a Lop and Scatter treatment before the encroachment reaches a threshold that would require more invasive and expensive treatments. -i.e. bullhog and seeding of phase II and III juniper. -Maintain understory vegetation and sagebrush. -Maintain sage-grouse, mule deer and elk winter and breeding habitats. -Reduce hazardous fuels to diminish the potential for a larger catastrophic fire event. -Increase water availability for other plants. -Improve watershed hydrology and wet meadow habitat by installing 5-10 Zeedyk structures in Little Creek and Black Mountain Creek - Replace the North Cisco Beach Road culvert crossing of North Eden Creek with a bottomless arch culvert which will be fully fish passable.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
If delayed or left untreated the juniper will continue to increase in cover and density and will eventually choke out the critical native shrubs and grasses that currently grow in the understory. Despite the short growing season of Rich County the treatment area is near a tipping point of requiring more expensive mechanical treatments. Loss of critical habitat will have negative consequences on the wildlife populations that depend on these species for survival during winter months. The cost of the treatment will continue to increase as trees reach phase II or phase III. Fire intensity and severity will increase as the juniper trees mature and spread. Trout Unlimited and partners have been working on the planning and design of the North Eden Creek culvert replacement for about 5 years. This work has been supported by WRI grants #5284 and #5520 and has resulted in the Rich County Commissioners approving the culvert replacement project. A 60% engineering design has been completed. Most of the construction funding has been secured and this proposal includes the "last money in" to complete the project.
Relation To Management Plan:
Utah's Sage-grouse strategic Management plan: Goal: Protect, maintain, enhance, and restore greater sage-grouse populations, habitats, and the ecosystems that sustain them. Reestablish, augment, and facilitate sustainable populations of greater sage-grouse in suitable habitats to improve statewide population continuity and distribution. Objective B-2: Enhance and restore current and potential sage-grouse habitats and the ecosystems that sustain them. Objective C-2: Identify and secure funding for habitat enhancement, research, monitoring, and maintenance. A. Vegetation management. 1. Manage seasonal sage-grouse habitats in a manner appropriate to the site conditions, and based on habitat assessment or local expert knowledge and observed ecological condition. and 4. Manage for late summer brood-rearing habitat that includes a variety of succulent vegetation adjacent to sagebrush escape and loafing cover. Create or enhance riparian/wet meadow habitat in areas where late brood-rearing habitat is lacking. Strive to manage sagebrush habitats with 10-25% canopy cover. State of Utah - Resource Management Plan pg 236 Expand Wildlife Populations Protect existing habitat and improve 500,000 acres of habitat Produce and maintain the desired vegetation for wildlife and livestock. Deer Unit Management Plan 2 Cache -Address loss of critical winter range to wildfires and other land management practices Statewide Deer Management Plan -Loss of critical winter range habitat Elk Herd Unit Management Plan #2 Cache Habitat - Maintain and/or enhance forage production through direct range improvements throughout the unit on winter range to achieve population management objectives. Pay special attention to WMA's and areas were holding elk could alleviate pressure on private landowners experiencing damage by wintering elk. Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan -Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. Rich CRMP Support efforts that restore degraded habitats and connectivity between fragmented habitats. Utah Wildlife Action Plan Threats to lowland sagebrush iii) Promoting and funding restoration that reduces the Uncharacteristic class, including cutting/mulching/chaining of invading pinyon and juniper trees, herbicide or mechanical treatment of non-native invasive species such as cheatgrass and secondary perennial weed species, and rehabilitation of burned areas following wildfire. iv) Promoting management that includes seeding a diversity of grasses, forbs and shrubs that will lead to increased resiliency and resistance in the plant community North Eden Creek and Bear Lake relationships to management plans: 1. Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy (2019): --This project meets the following recommended conservation actions to: 1) Expand BCT populations and distribution...2) Enhance and maintain habitat. -- Meets goals to manage for adfluvial (migratory populations connected to lakes) in the Bear River geographic management unit (GMU) and maintain all populations within the GMU 2. Utah Wildlife Action Plan (2015) -- Bonneville cutthroat trout are a N4 priority species. -- Key Habitats for Species of Greatest Conservation Need include Riverine and Aquatic Scrub-shrub. 3. UDWR Strategic Plan: this project will help the UDWR meet its Resource Goal, which is to "expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. This project will specifically address objectives 2 and 3 of the UDWR Resource Goal, which are to (1) "increase fish and game populations to meet management plan objectives and expand quality fishing and hunting opportunities," and to (2) "conserve sensitive species to prevent them from becoming listed as threatened or endangered." 4. UDWR Bear Lake Management Plan (hydrologic unit 16010201): Habitat enhancement and maintenance is specified for cutthroat trout in the plan. 5. Bear Lake Fisheries Management Plan (Utah and Idaho; 2010): The central management objectives of this plan are to: 1) conserve natives species, and 2) enhance sport fishing opportunities in Bear Lake. Both of these objectives will be addressed by this project. Specific management goals for Bonneville Cutthroat Trout include: maintain a viable adfluvial population and a sport fishery. This project will reestablish an adfluvial run of cutthroat trout in North Eden Creek, which will increase native trout recruitment to Bear Lake and the sport fishery.
Fire / Fuels:
The risk for more severe and intense wildfire will increase with PJ expansion. By reducing the fuel load we will be reducing the possibility for larger scale fire events in the future. Fuel loads will continue to increase as we hit phase II and phase III. A large fire event could lead to a loss of crucial sagebrush habitat/understory vegetation and the potential for a noxious weed infestation. By increasing the area and duration of wetted areas with Zeedyk structure in the creeks this project will increase the Bear Lake Plateaus resistance and resilience to catastrophic wildfires. There are multiple homes down slope from the project area. Reducing the fuel load on the top of the ridge should help prevent fire from traveling to the west. Reducing the fuel load on the top of the ridge should help prevent fire from traveling to the west. Per Rich County CRMP, at least 50 wildfires have been recorded in the area bounded by Laketown, Bear Lake and the ID and WY borders (S, W, N, E respectively) between 1980-2015 (pg 77, USFS data). These included 2,873 acres burned in the nearby Sixmile and Rabbit Creek areas. The North Eden fire in August of 2018 burned 13,763 acres just east of the project area. (DNR online data).
Water Quality/Quantity:
Juniper trees can have a large impact on the quantity and quality of water. The quantity of water that reaches the soil and understory vegetation can be altered by juniper. Decreased soil moisture through uptake and evapotranspiration after snow intercept leaves understory vegetation at a disadvantage. The depletion of understory vegetation increases the risk of erosion which will affect water quality during runoff events. Riparian improvements on the west end of Little Creek will include replacement of a small culvert or rock/gravel low-water crossing at the main southern access point and 5-10 Zeedyk grade control structures. Lop and scatter contract will be written to pile slash into ravines where possible. This will help to reduce erosion and sediment during run off events. Particularly to the west towards Bear Lake.
Compliance:
No surveys required for lop and scatter project on SITLA or Private Lands. A range improvement form will be submitted to SITLA prior to the start of the project. An application for a joint stream alteration permit will be submitted for the North Eden Creek culvert replacement and the Black mountain creek structure construction.
Methods:
To hire a contractor through state purchasing to perform lop and scatter. A crew with chainsaws will remove the trees per the specs in the contract. 12 inch angular boulders will be delivered to Black Mountain Creek and SITLA, DWR staff and volunteers will build 5-10 one rock dams similar to dam shown in Images/Documents section The engineering design will be completed and issued ready for construction for the replacement of the North Eden Creek culvert. Trout Unlimited will submit a request for bids for a construction firm. A contract will be awarded to a firm with construction to begin during autumn 2024. Construction will likely take a couple weeks.
Monitoring:
Photo plots will be taken before and after the treatment to upload to the database. Examples pre treatment photos attached. aerial imagery via UAV will be taken to monitor contract and provide before and after state of project area Wildlife counts and classifications will monitor mule deer in the area. Collared deer will continue to be monitored in the area. -See attached photo of collared deer use in the area. Pre-project fish and habitat surveys are underway on North Eden Creek as part of a graduate research study at Utah State University. The fish surveys (electrofishing) will be repeated after the culvert is replaced to assess how the distribution and abundance of fishes changes over time. In addition, genetic samples have been collected from the resident cutthroat trout population in the headwaters. These samples will be assessed for measures of genetic diversity. It's expected that genetic diversity and population resiliency will increase over time with the movement and migration of cutthroat trout from Bear Lake.
Partners:
DWR- will oversee the contract and implementation of the project, assistance with fisheries monitoring and processing of cutthroat trout genetic samples SITLA- will help plan the project and do site inspections GIP- coordinate with private land owners and permittees in the area. The goal with future phases is to expand on private property. Permitees- feedback on areas of concern on SITLA and private lands Private Landowners- Help identify areas to treat on their lands. Provide access and potential funding. BLM- Was approached about treating on their property but the area is not a current priority. MDF- Assist with planning, partial funding and contract/project management as needed. Trout Unlimited - will manage the North Eden Creek culvert replacement.
Future Management:
There are many acres of encroaching PJ that are all in the phase I state. We plan to do a multi year project to complete all the acres needing treatment before they hit phase II status. The project will expand onto private land as well as variously managed state/federal lands along the Bear Lake Plateau in future phases. There are no changes to the grazing plans or rest required following the treatments. As treatment phases progress, past phases will be inspected for areas that need retreatment to ensure project success and longevity. Trout Unlimited and partners continue to concurrently work on upgrades to an irrigation system on the lower end of North Eden Creek. These upgrades will increase water flows in the lower 1.5 miles of creek and be complementary to the fish passage improvement.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
By removing the expanding juniper, forage production will be increased due to the removal of competition. Grazing will continue in the area and without seeding no rest will be required. Hunting and other recreation activities are popular in this area and are expected to improve. The North Eden Creek culvert replacement will increase available spawning and early rearing habitat, which should then result in more wild cutthroat trout in Bear Lake, which is considered a Blue Ribbon Fishery in Utah.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$341,965.00 $530,000.00 $871,965.00 $9,500.00 $881,465.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies North Eden Creek: 90-foot long bottomless arch culvert with concrete footers. $136,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services North Eden Creek culvert replacement construction contract $80,000.00 $520,000.00 $0.00 2025
Other Stream Alteration Permit for Black Mountain Creek $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Contractual Services Contract services to Lop and Scatter approx 965 acres @ $75 per acre. $72,375.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) SITLA project oversight $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 2025
Personal Services (permanent employee) UDAF/NRCS employee time $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Culvert for stream crossing $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Materials and Supplies Purchase and delivery of angular rock for Zeedyk grade control structures $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Other Dedicated Hunter and other volunteer labor to construct Zeedyk grade control structures $0.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 2025
Contractual Services Trout Unlimited management of North Eden Creek culvert replacement project, including oversight of engineering, construction firm, permitting, compliance, other grant funding, and monitoring. $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2025
Other Trout Unlimited indirect costs (10%) on all WRI funding for North Eden Creek. $23,690.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$341,965.00 $530,000.00 $871,965.00 $9,500.00 $881,465.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
USFWS - Sage BIL - Public Land Funds applied for $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $65,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Volunteers Expected volunteer labor contributions $0.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 2025
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) North Eden Creek: includes $400k from National Fish Passage Program and $50k from partners program $0.00 $450,000.00 $0.00 2025
Resource Legacy Fund North Eden Creek $0.00 $80,000.00 $0.00 2025
Unfunded Balance Culvert and river work not funded $261,965.00 $0.00 $0.00 2025
Utah School & Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 2025
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF) $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 2025
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Low
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Animal Species – Native Medium
Greater Sage-grouse N3 R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Moose R3
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management Low
Moose R3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Improper Forest Management High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Pronghorn R3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Pronghorn R3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Bear Lake Cutthroat Trout R1
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Low
Habitats
Habitat
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration High
Lowland Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mountain Meadow
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mountain Sagebrush
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Very High
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channel Downcutting (indirect, unintentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Project Comments
Comment 02/01/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Cassie Mellon
From imagery it appears that some of the area is likely in Phase 2 or 3 already. How will these areas be addressed? Also concerned about your statement of the slash will be piled into ravines where possible. While this could be beneficial in some cases, additional detail on quantity, size and spacing of material would help ensure this doesn't create further problems with erosion.
Comment 02/02/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Ethan Hallows
Yes, we mapped a larger area then what will be cut. Last phase we wrote in a DBH stipulation for the contract. All phase II and III stringers and polygons will be left. There were just too many small polygons to map out. I will put in some wording to clarify that. Nathan Long started this project and then left us so I am picking it up. I was unaware of that wording but I could seed some benefits to cutting trees and strategically placing them in gullies and washes to slow seasonal water flows to prevent erosion. If you have any good input on that I would appreciate any advice.
Comment 02/02/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Brad Jessop
Ethan, looks like some good work removing the Phase 1 trees from this area. I echo Cassie's comment about the Phase 2/3 trees and I'm not sure a DBH limit is the way to go. I'm thinking specifically of some of the larger islands that appear to have no understory at all. It might be worth considering removing them from the treatment area as there likely won't be much benefit. A more accurate determination of acres would also help refine the budget.
Comment 02/02/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Ethan Hallows
Thanks for the input. I am willing to adjust the map if that helps with ranking. In the in the first phase we had a DBH standard as well as flagged the areas that we wanted cut and it worked well. The idea is not to target anything in the area that would be phase 2 or 3 for the reasons you listed. It is just a tedious mapping exercise to cut out each 10 acre chunk here or there. The budget reflects a smaller number of acres then the map shows for that reason.
Comment 02/03/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Brad Jessop
Thanks for the clarification.
Comment 02/03/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
On the map page, what is the affected area trying to show? We have typically used that for cultural resources, but from the budget that doesn't appear to be the case. We try to only map the treatment areas, which is most helpful for reporting purposes. If the affected area is just trying to show a larger foot print that the project will affect, then I would suggest deleting that polygon.
Comment 02/04/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Evan DeHamer
Ethan and Shane, thanks for keeping this area/project idea on the NRO radar and looping in MDF when picking this round back up. It's in an extremely important winter area for deer that call UT, ID and WY home in other seasons, and supports a suite of other sagebrush steppe species year-round. These improvements should be a great step towards stabilizing the area and supporting further restorative range work on the various willing ownerships of the Plateau in the near future.
Comment 02/07/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Ethan Hallows
Thanks for your input and coordination.
Comment 02/07/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Taylor Payne
Let's remember that projects like this are supposed to be presented in the Rich CRM to help the county stay coordinated. We'll try to do that when the next project meeting is called.
Comment 02/07/2024 Type: 1 Commenter: Ethan Hallows
Is there one planned in the near future? It doesnt seem like we have had a CRM meeting for awhile now. We would love to present it at the next meeting if there is one on the calendar.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
2985 Other point feature
3005 Fish passage structure Reconstruction Culvert
13266 Terrestrial Treatment Area Vegetation removal / hand crew Lop and scatter
13267 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Check dam(s) (low stage)
13267 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Stream Corridor/Channel Improvements Instream flow enhancement
Project Map
Project Map