Paradise Spring Mastication and Water Improvement Project
Project ID: 6037
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: 34
Project Manager: Stan Gurley
PM Agency: Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands
PM Office: Southwestern Area
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Masticate and seed 339 acres of pinyon and juniper near Paradise Spring near Pinto, Utah for the improvement of wildlife habitat, and reduction of fuels. Fence will be constructed to protect the seeding and to provide management. As part of this project the Pine Valley Ranger district will be cleaning and/or restoring 7 ponds found on the Pine Valley Allotment in the Paradise area of the District. The 7 ponds will also be fenced off using partial let-down style wildlife friendly fence.
Location:
23 mile southwest of Cedar City, Utah, near the Town of Pinto, Utah. Mastication is within Private land in Iron County and majority of the pond maintenance will take place in Washington County in the Paradise area of the Pine Valley Ranger District.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Wildlife habitat is the primary use of the private land is wildlife management. This private section is surrounded by USFS on all sides. The Pine Valley Allotment has several ponds in the paradise area of the Mountain Pasture that were created to provide water for livestock and wildlife on the forest. Periodically these ponds must be cleaned out. To prolong the life of the ponds we are planning lining them with bentonite clay where necessary, and fence them off with a wildlife friendly fence. Fencing off the ponds on the Mountain Unit of the Pine Valley unit will help control livestock distribution by excluding livestock at certain times of the years. The Mountain pasture is 36,413-acre pasture. Most of this pasture falls into roadless and wilderness areas. The cattle can cover a lot of area across this pasture and come into the several waters on top to drink. The theory of closing of the waters towards the end of the grazing season will help to push a large amount of these cows down off the mountain and concentrate around waters that are not as difficult to gather from. A set of cattle triggers can be placed on the exclosures as well, helping to create a trap to assist in efficient gathering of livestock. Riding and gathering on the mountain will still be required of the permittees. Permittees will be tasked with maintenance of the fences. Fences will not be built within the Pine Valley Wilderness. Big Game use the treatment area as critical migration and stopover habitat as documented by collar data by the UDWR (see map in photo section) and the pond areas are in summer crucial range. Collared mule deer pass through this area in the early fall and spring as mule deer and elk transition from winter to summer range. Often mule deer will give birth in this area increasing the need for nutritious forage for lactating females and their offspring. Improving range conditions will improve body condition for big game. The pond improvements are primarily in mule deer crucial summer range. Improved body condition will improve survival and condition of the animal once it reaches its winter range which is a critical element for big game winter survival. The area has one of the larger deer herds in the state with approximately 19,000 animals. This unit is one of the premier general season deer hunting units in Utah and provides ample hunting opportunity to the public. By doing so, we are also maintaining and enhancing economic stability in surrounding rural communities. Many of these rural incomes rely on wildlife and wildlife habitat as a source of income. This project area is identified as "priority for restoration of crucial mule deer habitat" under the Utah Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan (Utah Statewide Mule Deer Management Plan, 2019-2024). "Crucial" is defined as "habitat necessary to sustain the areas mule deer herd". Allowing the area to remain in phase 2 and 3 pinyon and juniper encroachment means less quality habitat to meet mule deer objectives. This project will specifically meet the objective of "working with local, state and federal land management agencies via land management plans and with private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deer habitats, especially fawning, wintering and migration areas". The Pine Valley Unit Mule Deer Management Plan specifically states to "reduce expansion of Pinyon-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinyon-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog, and chaining and provide guzzlers or other water sources where needed on critical summer fawning areas or in times of severe drought. " (Pine Valley Mule Deer Management Plan, 2020). With the improvements to private property, the planned enhancements to the USFS water sources, and the past two years of treatments that the USFS have implemented we can expect that wildlife will respond favorably and grazing management will be improved.
Objectives:
1. Increase mule deer usage of migration habitat and hold over time of migrating. This data can be determined through the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Migration Initiative. 2. Maintain and protect consistent water sources on the Pine Valley RD to benefit wildlife and improve grazing habitat and grazing management on the allotment. 3. Increase number of flowing plants by 10%
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
1. Currently the landowners are tolerant of wildlife use of their property. Wildlife, especially mule deer use these properties in migration as transitional habitat. Increasing forage, and land productiveness, will help offset conflicts with private landowners/livestock producers, while increasing the forage for wildlife and contributing to a diverse plant community. 2. Fire is a threat if left untreated due the dense stand of pinyon and juniper, that could threaten older age class ponderosa pine forest and private structures in the area. With the current fuel loads and the hundreds of acres of continuous fuel loading in the Pinto Springs drainage and neighboring drainages, a fire would quickly become catastrophic and threat hundreds of thousands of dollars in private structures, including homes, threaten the livestock industry of Southwest Utah, devastate multiple watersheds, and have lasting negative effects on wildlife and fish that depend on clean water and healthy enact riparian areas. 3. Sheet and Rill erosion contributes to the amount of sediment from the late phase II pinyon juniper sites that lack under story. With the mastication, mulch will cover the bare soil while seeds are established. Decreasing soil erosion and moisture lost, while increasing soil moisture holding availability and cover of the soil. In areas in or near the treatment sites that have been cleared and seed have proved to be very successful (see pictures for details). 4. This project will increase and maintain the availability of a diverse suite of vegetation communities. A healthy landscape has a diversity of vegetational states within an ecological site. A diverse landscape benefits a larger community of wildlife species and people. A diverse landscape is also more resistance and resilient to disturbance. By allowing this landscape to continue to move further into a dominant PJ woodland it increases the risk of its resistance to disturbance and its resilience to bounce back and heal after a disturbance. 5. This project will directly and indirectly affect positively high interest game. Mule deer are found in the project area. Mule deer could use this area for a staging area in their migration, as has been seen on other projects on the Parowan Front allowing them to be in better condition as they enter the winter range and allows the deer to spend less time on sensitive winter ranges. 6. Water is somewhat limited on the Pine Valley Allotment. Serval springs feed small troughs, but the majority of the water is caught and stored in the ponds. In summer of 2021 the ponds were nearly dry and did not fill until the monsoon season. This trigger a response for USFS range specialist, the permittee and UDWR biologist to determine that cleaning and lining the ponds needed to be done asap. The ponds identified for improvement are primarily located in crucial mule deer winter range. 7. As previously stated, because this area has been identified as a critical migration corridor for mule deer habitat, we feel that the need for project and importance should be elevated because of the overall impact of the habitat to these species of wildlife. Another ecological qualifier for elevating this project is that the project falls within an identified Bird Habitat Conservation Area (BHCA) as previously discussed. The project will also address multiple conservation needs for several bird species not reflected in the species section of this proposal.
Relation To Management Plan:
1. Utah Mule Deer Statewide Plan (12/5/2019-12/5/2024) "Work with local, state and federal land management agencies via land management plans and with private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deer habitats, especially fawning, wintering, and migration areas" "Work with local, state and federal land management agencies and ranchers to properly manage livestock to enhance crucial mule deer ranges." "Minimize impacts and recommend mitigation for losses of crucial habitat due to human impacts." "Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah." "Support existing and explore additional incentive programs for landowners that will increase tolerance, enhance habitat, and promote deer populations on private lands such as the CWMU, landowner permit, Walk-In Access programs, etc." This project falls in the Crucial Mule Deer Habitat Priorities. 2. Deer Herd Unit Management Plan, Deer Herd # 30, Pine Valley "A major proportion of both summer and winter habitat for deer on this unit is on private land. Therefore, it is paramount to work with private landowners to maintain both summer and winter habitat." "Reduce expansion of Pinion-Juniper woodlands into sagebrush habitats and improve habitats dominated by Pinion-Juniper woodlands by completing habitat restoration projects like lop & scatter, bullhog, and chaining." "Provide guzzlers or other water sources where needed on critical summer fawning areas or in times of severe drought" "Work toward long-term habitat protection and preservation through agreements with land management agencies and local governments, the use of conservation easements, etc. on private lands and working toward blocking up UDWR properties through land exchanges with willing partners." ii) Encourage land managers to manage portions of forests in early succession stages through the use controlled burning and logging. Controlled burning should only be used in areas with minimal invasive weed and/or safety concerns." 3. Utah Catastrophic Wildfire Reduction Strategy "Reduce fire risk by managing and removing invasive species." 4. Intermountain West Joint Venture Habitat Conservation Strategy "Support existing public-private partnerships to implement sagebrush habitat conservation, at regional, state, and local scales." "Remove encroaching conifers to functionally restore sagebrush habitat." 5. Utah Wildlife Action Plan "Gamble Oak and Mountain Shrub is a key habitat identified in the WAP." "WAP identifies inappropriate fire frequency as a threat to Gamble Oak and Mountain Shrub habitat. This project will reduce future fire risk and act as a fire buffer to adjacent higher risk areas." 6. State of Utah Resource Management Plan "Actively remove pinyon-juniper encroachment other ecological sites due to its substantial consumption of water its detrimental effects on sagebrush, other vegetation, and wildlife." "Conserve, improve, and restore 500,000 acres of mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges." "Work with landowners, federal government and private organizations to conserve valuable wildlife habitat and winter range along urban interface." "Develop mechanisms and policies to incentivize private landowners throughout Utah to conserve valuable wildlife habitat throughout Utah." 7. Iron County Resource Management Plan "Iron County encourages vegetative treatments for maximum yield of forage and rangeland health." "Goals include making sure there is quality forage, water, cover, space and security sufficient to support productive populations. This includes conserving habitat for migratory birds, maintaining vegetation treatments that benefit wildlife, prioritizing treatments to improve habitats and coordinating predator control."
Fire / Fuels:
This project will decrease the risk of high severity wildfire by reducing fuel loading and promoting the growth of understory vegetation, which are critical to maintaining ecosystem resilience. As demonstrated by the nearby Brianhead fire during the summer of 2017, treatments like these can break up the continuity of fuels and act as fuel breaks. This project will do the same if a fire ignited nearby where fuel loading is heavy in phase 3 pinyon and juniper invaded sites. The current fire regime condition class is moderate (2) and would be reduced to low (1) immediately after treatment. The habitat type has been identified in the 2015-2025 Utah Wildlife Action Plan that lowland sagebrush is a key habitat and the threats associated with this key habitat are inappropriate fire frequency and intensity. This project will help to achieve this goal. Reducing the threat of wildfire is important because of the critical nature of this habitat to mule deer and elk. Completing this project and reducing the risk of fire will help to protect important sagebrush steppe and mountain brush habitat that is critical for priority species including, but not limited to, mule deer. This project will also help to protect the springs and wetlands. If a high severity fire were to move through the area water soil infiltration would decrease, erosion will increase, and the potential for water to get into the aquifer will decrease and spring flows may decrease.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Reducing the amount of pinyon/juniper will increase and prolong stream flows, while reducing erosion caused by bare soil. The species planted will help stabilize the soil and reduce erosion. Kormas et al. found that drainage's dominated with juniper experience "snow water equivalent peaks higher, snow melts out earlier, and more water is lost to evapotranspiration in catchments when compared to sagebrush steppe vegetation". In a study from 2008, Deboodt, et. al (2008) mentions that juniper trees can use up to 30 gallons of water a day, when adequate moisture is present. It also states that Vegetative modeling has shown that 9 to 35 trees per acre can utilize all the precipitation delivered to a site in a 13-in annual precipitation zone. In their study researchers monitored two watersheds 12 years prior to treatment (cutting). After the treatment analysis indicated that juniper reduction significantly increased late season spring flow by 225%, increased days of recorded groundwater by an average of 41 days , and increased the relative availability of late season soil moisture to soil depths of .76 meters. It was also noted that managing vegetation for water yield may be obtainable at a much lower precipitation threshold than what was previously understood. Baker, et. al (1984) found a 157% increase in stream flows over a 147-ha pinyon and juniper treatment. Recent research Roundy, et. al. (2014) has shown that mechanical treatments to remove pinyon and juniper increase time that soil water is available. Even four years after treatment, treated areas showed from 8.6 days to-18 days additional water availability at high elevation sites. Roth, et. All (2017) stated snowpack is deeper and last longer in the open site at the low and mid sites (4-26 and 11-33 days, respectively). Additional research by Young, et. al. (2013) also showed a relationship between tree removal and soil climates and wet days on these sites, which while providing more available moisture for desired vegetation could also provide moisture for weeds. Numerous studies have shown that increased infiltration rates and less overland flow improve both water quality and quantity. Reducing pinyon and juniper trees, according the available research should increase snowpack, and time that snowpack is on the ground, increase spring flows, and increase soil moisture. It is expected that similar results will happen in this area after the treatment takes place.
Compliance:
This project will be meet all standards and specifications of NRCS. All environmental and cultural evaluations and clearances will take place as part of the NRCS standard. All practices will be installed using the State of Utah contracting, allowing site mangers to author, oversee, and inspect the projects. The USFS will be completing their surveys and clearances to allow for the pond maintenance and fencing.
Methods:
This treatment will include aerial seeding, and mastication. Aerial seeding will be done with a diversified mix of grasses and forbs before mastication in early fall. Due to the nature of the terrain the option to use fixed wing or helicopter will be determined by the contractor. Seed will be obtained from the Great Basin Research Center (GBRC). Mastication will be completed with at least three (preferably multiple), mobile, tracked or wheeled, hydraulically or PTO driven, mechanical mulching/shredder (Bullhog) shall be furnished on a fully-operational basis, with a competent, fully-qualified operator, and shall be capable of mulching/shredding live trees up to twenty-six (26) inches in diameter at twelve inches above ground level measured on the uphill side, per state contract. Grazing management will be no grazing for 2 growing seasons in treated areas, grazing will be monitored, and grazing agreements will be signed prior commencement to the project. Ponds will be improved using heavy equipment and bentonite clay where necessary. Equipment and materials for pond improvements will be mobilized via an administrative USFS road. Approximately 6,700 feet of fence will be constructed as a 4 strand barbwire fence no taller than 42'' with wildlife friendly wire spacing. Fence will have cedar posts and braces and appropriate stays as portions of let down fence are necessary and will be designated by the USFS. Fences will include wire gates for equipment access and each fenced pond will have one man gate. Both the pond and fencing work will be contractual services. Local sportsmen groups and dedicated hunters will assist with implementation and future maintenance.
Monitoring:
NRCS will contract practice 645-Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, which will require two years of rest from livestock grazing and a stubble height of 16" following two growing seasons of rest from livestock grazing. A grazing management plan will be included but will not be a contracted item. Using the data from the migration initiative collared deer movements can be monitored. This will show if there is hold over in these treatment areas, if hunting pressure is affecting the deer, if weather changes timing, or duration of migration, and use of private lands verses public lands. Farm Bill Biologist will establish photo points at random locations within the treatment and monitor yearly for a minimum of 5 years and greater at landowners' consent. Ponds will be maintained and monitored by USFS and the livestock permittees. Fences will be repaired annually with adjustment to let down areas as needed. USFS will conduct wildlife surveys and livestock use monitoring as well as ongoing vegetation monitoring in the area.
Partners:
Private Landowners will contribute their assistance from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) to the project. Utah Division Wildlife Resources hold the data associated with the migration initiative and a will potentially set up a vegetation trend monitoring site on the project. A Farm Bill Biologist will also contract and implement the project, as well as continue to plan it. Natural Resource Conservation Service-is working with the landowners to plan and carry out the project. Through Environmental Quality Incentive Program potential funding will be available. USFS will manage implementation of the pond improvements/fencing and conduct wildlife and livestock monitoring.
Future Management:
This private property is strictly managed for wildlife. The landowners want to increase wildlife, mainly game species for viewing, and hunting. Because of the size of the property wildlife are likely to move to and from the property due to pressure, weather, and circadian and annual ques. Livestock grazing will only be considered if recommended to improve habitat conditions. The USFS will continue to mange the Pine Valley permit for the multiple use and work with the constituents to improve our public lands.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Wildlife is abundant in the area and of high interest to public and private stakeholders in the area. Wildlife viewing and hunting takes place on the property and on the public property around it. This area has one of the larger deer herds in the state with approximately 19,000 animals. This unit is one of the premier general season deer hunting units in Utah and provides ample hunting opportunity to the public. By doing so, we are also maintaining and enhancing economic stability in surrounding rural communities. Many of these rural incomes rely on wildlife and wildlife habitat as a source of income. Turkeys are found throughout Pinto Creek and Paradise Springs area and provide hunting and viewing opportunities for the public and private landowners. Hunting takes place with general season and limited entry tags, providing opportunities for youth to have hunts with less pressure and greater success.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$454,745.00 $0.00 $454,745.00 $14,400.00 $469,145.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Fence 22,000 ft*$4.00/ft $88,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Archaeological Clearance Cultural of mastication 339ac*$40/ac $13,560.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Seed flight 339ac*$15/ac $5,085.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Mastication 339ac*$500/ac $169,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Expense for transport and delivery of bentonite clay to project area $2,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Other In-Kind Services provided by the Dixie National Forest Service to manage and implement the pond and fence projects. Including time, travel, and potential use of USFS equipment. $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 2023
Contractual Services Pond cleaning and sealing work on 7 ponds, heavy equipment. In kind costs are for contract layout and administration. $25,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 2023
Contractual Services Fence construction around ponds. approx. 6,700 feet of 4 strand barb partial let down fence @$5/ft In kind costs are for USFS led contract layout and administration. $33,500.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 2023
Materials and Supplies Bentonite Clay for sealing Ponds -Est. $260 per ton and 4 tons per Pond- (4 tons x $260) x 7 ponds 28 tons total $7,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Management and implementation $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 2023
Seed (GBRC) Seed for 339 acres $315.00/ac=$106,785.00 $110,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$45,000.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 $14,400.00 $59,400.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Mule Deer Foundation (MDF) S023 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 2023
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) S025 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
United States Forest Service (USFS) $0.00 $0.00 $10,400.00 2023
Sportsman for Fish & Wildlife (SFW) S027 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Domestic Livestock
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Spotted Bat N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Water Developments for Livestock Low
Habitats
Habitat
Gambel Oak
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mountain Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/10/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
You know how the pinyon jay conversation and tree removal projects... Please expound how jays would benefit since you have them in your species benefitted section.
Comment 01/10/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Stan Gurley
Thanks for asking Clint. I forgot to address this while I was writing the proposal. I will add this same language to need for the project section after this week, so there isn't any confusion about when the project was submitted. "Recent data shows a decrease in Pinyon Jay populations. It is important to note that pinyon jays need health pinyon-juniper forest. As per the sage steppe guidelines PJ density is designated phase of succession (Phases I-III) Phase one being the most sparse, young trees, and Phase three being the most dense, old trees lacking understory. Research has shown large landscapes of Phase II and Phase III trees are vulnerable to parasites, disease and large-scale die offs from drought (see Greenwood et al.). Pinyon Jays rely on pinyon and juniper forest for food, cover, and nesting. Large scale die offs of Pinyon would and do have negative effects on pinyon jay populations. Creating healthy mosaics increase the diversity across the landscape. Of the site proposed for treatment. According the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources pinyon jays "nests are located in trees, usually conifers, five to thirty feet off the ground". The islands of trees will be left as we continue the planning process and obtain the areas that need to avoided for cultural resources and wildlife. The Conservation Strategy for Pinyon Jay produced by the Pinyon Jay Working Group states, "Pinyon Jays appear to use Phase I woodlands most frequently, Phase II woodland at an intermediate level, and Phase III woodlands rarely. Therefore, preferentially treating denser woodlands as opposed to less-dense woodlands is recommend." By removing trees in these areas, we are improving the ecological value of the landscape. "
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Well here we are again Stan. I am only commenting on a few more projects and then it is Gary's turn. Unfortunately for you the few more projects all look like yours....lol. This looks like a great one and involving the Dixie cross boundary. Anything we can do to help get those cows down the mountain faster will have big range benefits in the pasture. Nicely done. 1) Thank you for using Migration Initiative data in your proposal. First one I have seen. I do not see the map in the photo section you alluded to in the proposal though? 2) Again I would suggest reviewing the threshold discussion under ECOLOGICAL THRESHOLD -- THREATS AND RISKS 3) same question as Clint but regarding the bats. Assuming you are thinking more consistent ponds = more consistent bugs = happier bats, but you don't say that anywhere that I saw. 4) For fire again what are values at risk on private and also if sagebrush is what you are treating why do you only have oak in as a WAP habitat when sagrebrush could get more points for the threats you list? 5) This all eventually drains into Pinto Creek and Newcastle for which there is a TMDL and these treatments would both support the TMDL. Probably worth mentioned in Water Quality and including in your plans. 6) Any monitoring for bats and jays? 7) Maintenance plans? 8) In Sustainable Uses it might be worth discussing permit compliance issues on that pasture and how the ponds will help.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Rhett Boswell
Mike, Thanks for commenting. I will address some of you questions as I am guilty of contributing the pond portion of this project. I added the bats as beneficiaries based on comments I've seen UDWR make on other similar pond projects. The paradise area has high potential for use by numerous bat species due to the rocky outcroppings and foraging areas for insects, the pond improvements will enhance the available foraging habitat for bats. Also, the Dixie plans project level wildlife surveys for this project which will include Pinyon Jay surveys. The Dixie also plans to monitor the pond areas using acoustic bat recording devices to get a better understanding of which species are present and if the forest focal species (Townsend's big eared and Spotted Bat) are present. The mule deer location data from the migration initiative is sensitive info and cannot be shared publicly however, I will add a generalized map of the area in the Images/Documents that depicts the summer habitat and the migration routes near the project. The private fence will be maintained by the landowner/operator. The pond fencing will be monitored and maintained by the Dixie and/or dedicated hunters and will likely be modified for the first few seasons to adjust the best sections for the let down areas.
Comment 01/24/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Stan, Can you clarify the amount of fence to be built. You state and budget for 6,700 feet but the map shows the entire private section being fenced.
Comment 01/24/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Rhett Boswell
Scott, thanks for comment, the 6700 ft of fence is for the pond part of the project and is an estimate. Stan has 22,000 feet of fence at $4.00/ft budgeted for the private property in the Finance tab.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Stan, Rhett: I fully support improved water sources that will benefit non-game species. Spotted bat might be a stretch, Rhett. Species I have caught or recorded in this area include: big brown, long-eared myotis, western long-legged myotis, Mexican free-tailed, silver haired, Yuma myotis, California myotis. All would benefit from consistent water sources. Does anyone plan to leave ANY juniper/pinyon out there?! It may indeed be in a BHCA, Stan (I notice you like to throw that in), but there are bird species that inhabit the pj everyone is so intent on destroying! Keith
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Rhett Boswell
Keith, thanks for the input. I agree the Spotted Bat may be less likely but it is a forest sensitive species and shares many habitat preferences with the other species of bats such as Townsend's. It is with optimism that I hope to find Spotted Bat in the area as species habitat models are showing the area as having potential. As for PJ, on this project all the PJ removal is located on the private property. The Pine Valley Ranger District is in the process of designing a district wide wildlife habitat project in which we target PJ ecological sites as areas we aim to protect. New research on PJ removals and PJ obligate birds is helping land managers identify "sweet spots" in which we can benefit both PJ and sage obligate species. See the new work from Dr. Zeller and the rocky mtn research station in the Images/Document tabs.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Stan Gurley
Keith I appreciate you concerns about PJ removal. So this is a 640 acre section. There are 339 acres (I even rounded up) planned for cultural resources clearance. I will just take a stab at it and I think about 10% of the 339 acres will be eligible sites. That leaves us at 309 acres. 640ac/309ac=48% of the private ground will be treated. I agree some of the birds in the BHCA are also sage brush obligates. I see this as we are creating habitat for all species utilize.
Comment 08/30/2023 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
This comment has been deleted by author or admin.
Completion
Start Date:
07/01/2022
End Date:
06/30/2023
FY Implemented:
2023
Final Methods:
During fiscal year 2023, an employee inadvertently coded time to WRI project #6037, instead of project #6005. Unfortunately, the error was not caught when reviewing the payroll reports or during year-end review. The total charge was $456.92. This error was not realized until after fiscal year 2023 was closed and unfortunately, it cannot be corrected.
Project Narrative:
N/A
Future Management:
N/A
Map Features
N/A
Project Map
N/A