Virgin River Watershed Resiliency
Project ID: 6041
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: 917
Project Manager: Carrie Howard
PM Agency: Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands
PM Office: Southwestern Area
Lead: Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
FFSL will oversee contracted crews for the removal of Russian olive and tamarisk. Removal is hand treatment only (no machinery, and no arch clearance), and applying herbicide via a cut stump method. Cut material will be piled to burn. This project has been on-going for multiple years, funded with a federal LSR grant. Additional funding is requested to extend onto BLM property and provide additional funding to continue treatments on a property recently purchased by The Nature Conservancy.
Location:
Project is along the Virgin River on properties between the Quail Creek Diversion Dam and Rockville Town limits. Treatment area is across multiple ownerships including: BLM, TNC, private landowners, Grafton Heritage Partnership, Washington County Water Conservation District, and Town of Springdale.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Quail Creek Diversion Dam, located below the treatment area, diverts water to the Hurricane Hydropower Plant before being stored in Sand Hollow Reservoir, a municipal water source. During flood events, the gates are lifted to avoid impacts to the infrastructure. This results in a loss of water stored for municipal use. With expected changing weather patterns of high intensity storms and limited snow pack (NOAA), it is important to restore watershed function in this area to capture more flood runoff. Russian olive and tamarisk alter the flow of the river, resulting in incised stream banks, increased flood damage risk, and reduced water quality. By removing these invasive species, the treatment area will have reduced stream channelization allowing for dispersed floodwaters. Additionally, restoring native vegetation to the treatment area will provide a functioning riparian forage buffer that can recharge ground water and lessen storm water runoff. Restoring native vegetation in this area can filter debris from post-fire flooding while propagating additional cottonwood and willow forests. Benefits of this project include reduce wildfire potential, increased wildlife habitat, and increased water quality and quantity. Desert sucker, flannel mouth sucker, and Virgin spinedace are not currently ESA listed. Virgin spinedace was recently petitioned for the second time to be listed under the ESA. Due to recovery efforts, including projects similar to this, the Virgin spinedace has maintained population levels and are not listed under the ESA. According to the report on the Federal Register, the primary stressors affecting the Virgin spinedace include reduced streamflow, impeded fish passage, poor water quality, and climate change. Removal of Russian olive and tamarisk will reduce stream channelization allowing for more riffles and pools increasing the habitat for these fish species. Additionally, there is no diversion or dam upriver of this treatment increasing success of this project to benefit wildlife.
Objectives:
Goal: Restore watershed resiliency and native wildlife habitat along the Virgin River. -Objective 1: Cut all Russian olive and tamarisk along the river corridor in the treatment boundary to reduce river channelization. -Objective 2: Educate landowners in the area to continue treating any resprouts following this treatment to extend the sustainability of this project. -Objective 3: Plant native seed and transplant willows after removal of invasive species to provide native vegetation for wildlife habitat and reduce noxious weed encroachment. -Objective 4: Pile cut material to burn, reducing fuel loading along the river.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
FFSL is using other federal grant funds, that are soon expiring, for staff funding and treatment of private lands. Combining this funding with the requested WRI funds will allow for FFSL to extend onto BLM lands that would otherwise not be treated. Expanding this treatment to BLM lands will prolong the treatments success by removing the seed source. Additionally, most of this river corridor is developed and BLM property offers an ideal area for floodwater distribution to recharge ground water. The overstory is composed of native cottonwood vegetation. Recent flooding has resulted in an increase of native cottonwood and willow regeneration along the banks of the river. At the moment, the native plants have the advantage. Nonetheless, Russian olive and tamarisk can grow up to six feet a year and soon begin to outcompete native species and become dominant. In drought years, these long taproot invasive species are able to access the water table whereas native shallow rooted species begin to die from lack of water. These invasive species will continue to lower the water table, extending drought conditions experienced by native vegetation. Currently these invasive species are small and scattered throughout native vegetation, with few patches of dense monocultures of these invasive species. This is especially important because the soil biota still supports cottonwood germination and establishment. Once a riverbank is only composed of invasive species, the mycorrhizal fungi required for cottonwood seed germination is often missing, requiring soil inoculation for successful restoration. Treating this area now will have high success rates, whereas delaying this treatment will have increased cottonwood and willow mortality caused by drought conditions and competition with invasive species. Treatment is relatively inexpensive at the moment. As invasive species increase so does treatment cost and effectiveness. Russian olive and tamarisk also change the natural flow of the river. With each flood the banks become more incised altering the natural flow of the channel and lowering the water table, making it difficult for native plants to re-establish. Re-vegetation will also be minimal since the area is dominated by natives. However, in another five years invasive species will begin to dominate making re-vegetation much more difficult and costly. Tamarisk and dense Russian olive thickets increase the risk for wildfire. Wildfire can be carried much easier through these species compared to native species. This area borders many residences and businesses. Not only are structures at risk, but a fire in this area would be detrimental to this ecosystem. If a fire were to occur many of the old growth cottonwoods would be killed and the soil could be sterilized, preventing establishment of new cottonwoods. As this ecosystem is not adapted to fire, it is likely the burn area would be replaced with the re-sprouts of tamarisk and Russian olive and other secondary weeds. This area needs to be treated before it is lost to a wildfire where restoration would be difficult with limited success.
Relation To Management Plan:
There are numerous management plans that address removal of invasive species, increase of wildlife habitat, reduction of fuels, and increasing collaboration and education with landowners. Below highlight some of those plans. --1-- Forestry, Fire and State Lands, Utah Forest Action Plan 2020: This project addresses 3 of the 4 goals of Utah's FAP: 1. Restore healthy and resilient trees and forests across Utah. 2. Reduce wildfire risk to communities, water resources, and other natural resource values. 3. Increase collaborative landscape-scale forest restoration activities across the State. --2-- Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program (VRP): Actions to benefit 3 native fish species under the ESA and the southwestern willow flycatcher. Participants include USFWS, Zion NP, DNR, Washington County Water Conservancy District, and TNC. Actions include riparian restoration, removal of non-native plants, flow improvements, and education. --3--Utah Wildlife Action Plan 2015-2025: Invasive species, a level 3 threat, are ranked very high for Virgin spinedace, Desert sucker, and Flannelmouth sucker. It is ranked high for Southwestern willow flycatcher. The project is within the riverine aquatic key habitat. This project helps reduce 3 of the threats to this key habitat: inappropriate fire frequency and intensity, droughts, and invasive plant species. --4--Partners for Fish and Wildlife (PFW) Program, Mountain-Prairie Region Strategic Plan 2017-2021: this project is within a PFW focus area, priority habitat type (riparian) and priority species (the proposed project addresses invasive species as a habitat threat). --5--Natural Resource Conservation Service, Working Lands for Wildlife Program: this project addresses habitat restoration, invasive species removal and connectivity of suitable habitat for a focus species, the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, through addressing the following goals: protect, maintain and restore riparian habitat; increase and improve occupied, suitable and potential SWFL breeding habitat; improve weed and invasive species management; increase connectivity of existing and potential SWFL habitat. --6--DEQ Virgin River Watershed Water Quality Management Plan: is supported by this project by the continued control of exotic plants including tamarisk and Russian olive and restoration of cottonwood trees. --7-- Utah Noxious Weed Act supports this proposal through the continued removal and control of tamarisk, a Class C Weed. Also by meeting Strategic goals and Objectives, Goal I, protect the State's natural, agricultural, and ranching resources including water quality and quantity.
Fire / Fuels:
Numerous residences, businesses, and historical buildings in Virgin, Springdale, Rockville and Grafton have high wildfire risk with current Russian olive and tamarisk thickets. With limited access across the river and between parcels, a fire on either side could be difficult to combat. This project is focused on the Virgin River above the Quail Creek Diversion Dam, which supplies water to the Hurricane Hydropower plant before delivery to Sand Hollow and Quail Creek Reservoirs. A fire in this watershed could severely impact multiple municipal water supplies and damage water infrastructure. A fire in this ecosystem could severely damage cottonwood stands, reducing the limited native vegetation along the riparian corridor. This would heavily impact wildlife species, including endangered and sensitive species. A severe fire could sterilize the soil, killing the mycorrhizal fungi required for cottonwood germination. As riparian ecosystems are not adapted for fire, recovery from a fire would be very difficult and success would be limited. This project will remove Russian olive and tamarisk and the fire risk associated with it. Native cottonwood and willow trees in this ecosystem are adapted to flooding. By removing the invasive species and allowing for natural flooding, sand deposits will create vegetation gaps and reduce the fine fuel build up; this creates a sustainable fuel reduction project.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Removing Russian olive and tamarisk will reduce stream channelization and create a functioning riparian vegetation buffer, increasing both water quality and quantity. The headwaters of this river are not dammed. The first diversion is below the treatment area, which has the gates lifted during flood events. Restoring the native vegetation along the riverbanks will allow for periodic flooding into the riparian vegetation buffer. This will allow for reduced flood damage, increased sedimentation filtration, and allow for flood waters to recharge ground water sources. A functioning riparian vegetation buffer has the potential to reduce the need for the diversion dam gates to be lifted, increasing the amount of water diverted for municipal use to Sand Hollow and Quail Creek Reservoirs. Additionally, a functioning riparian vegetation buffer can reduce the impacts of post-fire runoff on fish, wildlife, and municipal water infrastructure. Tamarisk plants excrete salt, resulting in an accumulation of salt in the surface soil. This salt layer increases soil pH, reduces native vegetation, and negatively impacts the watershed during runoff events. Removal of tamarisk will help water quality for this watershed, as well as reducing cumulative impacts on downstream uses. Russian olive and tamarisk are deep-rooted, invasive species. In drought years, they have better access to lower ground water tables, where native species start to drought out. These invasive species can prolong drought effects on native vegetation as they continue to access limited ground water. Removing these invasive species will increase water quantity to native vegetation and reduce prolonged drought effects on the landscape.
Compliance:
The area will be treated with hand crews using chainsaws. There will be no machinery or ground disturbance and therefore no archaeological clearance is needed. Removal of invasive species fall within a Categorical Exclusion on BLM property.
Methods:
Russian olive and tamarisk will be cut using hand-removal methods, herbicide will be applied using the cut-stump method, and the majority of the cut material will be piled to burn. Slash will be chipped in retreatment areas with road access. Herbicides to be used include: Glyphosate for Russian olive, and Triclopyr for tamarisk. Work on BLM and TNC properties will be completed by UCC crews or private contractors if needed. FFSL seasonal staff will conduct the retreatment and the initial treatments on the other privately owned parcels included in the project boundary. The work will take place outside of bird nesting season and fish spawning season: after August 31st and before mid-April. Seeding will occur in the late fall, after all material is cut. Pile burn operations will occur in the winter when conditions allow. Willow pole cuttings will be harvested and planted in the dormant season. Areas where burn operations are complete and where active regeneration is necessary will take priority for willow planting. Resprouts will be monitored for 1 year post-treatment, and removed by FFSL using other federal grant funding.
Monitoring:
For short-term monitoring, FFSL will conduct a retreatment on non-federally owned lands 1 year following the treatment using current federal LSR grant money. Any invasive species that are detected will be removed. Additional willow and cottonwood plantings will occur, if needed or requested by landowners. Repeat photo points will be collected before, after, and 1 year post-treatment to show the treatment's progression. To ensure long-term success, landowners will be educated on how to identify invasive species, and encouraged to monitor and retreat their properties yearly. The Rockville and Springdale newsletters have been used in the past and will continue to be used to remind landowners to remove invasive species during their spring clean-ups. Additionally, DWR biologists annually conduct fish monitoring surveys in this area and conduct bird surveys below the diversion dam. TNC staff will continue to monitor their property and conduct retreatments of invasive species as necessary. The Virgin River Management Team and Zion NP have been fully supportive and help remove upriver seed sources, prolonging the effectiveness of this treatment.
Partners:
TNC: Treatment of 1.7 river miles; approximately 60 acres of floodplain to treat. BLM: Treatment of 0.6 river miles; approximately 55 acres of floodplain to treat. Town of Springdale: Outreach and education for re-treatment on private lands, treatment of 0.6 river miles at the town holding ponds; approximately 12 acres of floodplain to treat. Town of Rockville: Outreach and education for retreatment and initial treatment of privately owned lands. Grafton Heritage Partnership: Treatment of 1 river mile and extending to approximately 36 acres of flood plain. Continuing ongoing partnership to retreat areas. Washington County Water Conservancy District: Treatment of 0.15 river miles; approximately 3 acres of floodplain to treat. FFSL: Project lead, collaboration with partners and landowners through outreach and education. DWR: Ongoing bird and fish surveys on the Virgin River. Hurricane Fire Department: Pile burning with help from FFSL. Private Landowners: Retreatment is planned for approximately 40 landowners who participated in previous treatments. One landowner, Tracy Cox who boarders the Springdale ponds, is scheduled for initial treatment this year.
Future Management:
On-going outreach and education will occur at a community level to encourage landowners to continually monitor and remove these invasive species on their property. The Virgin River Management Team is fully supportive of removing these invasive species and are working with the Town of Springdale in monitoring and removal efforts on town owned property. Grafton Heritage Partnership and The Nature Conservancy are continually monitoring the sections of their properties that have been previously treated, and seeking efforts to remove the re-sprouts. FFSL will continue to educate and encourage landowners to remove any re-sprouts. Additional funding and funding sources will be sought to continue this treatment downriver and assist landowners with retreatment efforts. Zion NP continues to remove the upriver seed source of these invasive species, prolonging the effectiveness of this treatment. Native seed mix requested for this project will be planted in areas that do not have cattle grazing. Grazing will not need to be rested for this treatment.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
During flood events fields are undercut and irrigation ditches are filled with sediment. This treatment will help disperse flood waters to areas that would benefit from flooding, and reduce impacts to agriculture in the area. Additionally, river access and vegetation will be improved helping disperse wildlife and reduce wildlife landowner conflicts. Turkeys, deer, and geese often occupy hay fields in the area. The BLM treatment area falls within the Zion Hunting Unit. Dispersing the deer and turkeys to this area would benefit both agriculture landowners and the hunting community. Both Rockville and Grafton are crucial winter range for mule deer, and year-long habitat for turkey. Grafton Heritage Partnership, BLM, and private landowner Tracy Cox graze cattle. Removal of these invasive species will help distribute grazing along the riparian corridors. During drought years, native species and forage will have better production if these tap rooted invasive species are removed. Additionally, this project protects the cottonwood forests and their biological diversity. This is an important aesthetic for the local economies. Continuing projects to remove these invasive species will continue to promote the recovery of the listed fish species. Virgin spinedace has been petitioned twice to be listed under the ESA, which would regulate the other uses in this area more.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$64,178.00 $64,620.00 $128,798.00 $0.00 $128,798.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Personal Services (permanent employee) FFSL salary/benefits $0.00 $30,720.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (seasonal employee) Two seasonal FFSL staff $0.00 $22,400.00 $0.00 2023
Materials and Supplies Herbicide, sprayers, PPE, chains, and saw parts $3,178.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 2023
Seed (GBRC) Seed mix for initial treated areas and for select areas that are being retreated $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services UCC Crew for 11 weeks $46,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services UCC crew hired for 2 weeks to conduct retreatment in Spring 2022 on Grafton Heritage property. $0.00 $8,500.00 $0.00 2022
Contractual Services UCC Crew 1 week (carry-over request) $4,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$64,120.92 $70,870.00 $134,990.92 $0.00 $134,990.92
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM (Aquatics) A100 -RF $4,214.91 $0.00 $0.00 2023
DNR Watershed U004 $3,464.91 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Landscape Scale Restoration Funding is a federal LSR grant awarded to FFSL that expires the end of FY 2024 or until funding is exhausted. $0.00 $70,870.00 $0.00 2023
DNR Watershed U004 $55,656.01 $0.00 $0.00 2023
BLM (Aquatics) A100 -RF $785.09 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species – Non-native Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Mallard R1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Other Ducks R3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Project Comments
Comment 01/12/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Totally stoked to see this project. Anytime we can improve desert rivers we need to. I have a little history down here with a couple landowner/projects. With Elaine too from a few years back. I kind of got pulled into other priority areas but super excited to see this proposal. Quick glance looks like you might be treating some places treated a few years ago. This accurate? If so might consider this a maintenance project as well to help elevate the need? I dunno just a thought. I'd really like to chat with you more, maybe get out on the river with you too.
Comment 01/12/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
I just noticed in the photos you have...wow look at that cottonwood regen on the grafton pic! We saw some of this same stuff on Grafton years ago after some removal with NRCS/USFWS.
Comment 01/13/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Thanks for pointing this out. I have the retreatment areas noted as such in the map, but it doesn't really stand out. Grafton Heritage property was treated through WRI a few years back. I am using a federal LSR grant for maintenance on this property as well as all the private property parcels (with the exception to one landowner who is initial treatment). Requested WRI funding is for initial treatment on BLM and TNC property.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Carrie, Awesome project across boundaries. Love it. My one suggestion to get you more points would be a little more elaboration on the Species, Quality, Benefit, Need. Spinedace, desert sucker and flannelmouth sucker are all in the reach. Spinedace and flannelmouth are both managed under Conservation Agreements and desert sucker are a SGCN. Spinedace were recently petitioned to be listed for the second time but were found not warranted mainly because of conservation actions like this that have occurred over the past 30 years. Russian olive and tamarisk do a great job at creating a homogenous, single thread channel that reduces habitat complexity nd quality for all three of these species. Not to mention the potential water quantity benefits. This is a great project for SGCN but not all the rankers may know the area or the species. Also under sustainable uses, keeping these species from being listed under ESA allow for other uses not being more regulated.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Mike, thank you for the comment. This is not my area of expertise, so I appreciate that you are pointing out benefits that I overlooked. I have updated the Need for Project and Sustainable Uses to reflect the importance of this project to those species.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Someone has to care about the fish! :-)
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Keith Day
Carrie, I presume you will maintain native overstory? Also, given drought conditions we continue to experience, what steps, if any, do you anticipate necessary for your seed mix to establish. The danger of a seeding failure is complete colonization/resprouting by non-native weeds. Just because the project is next to a river does not guarantee sufficient hydration. Keith
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Luckily there is still a mature cottonwood canopy within the project areas. These trees are being left, and extra care is being taken to make sure the burn piles don't scorch any of them. Willow cuttings will be planted to restore the understory component, maintaining vertical diversity for wildlife. As for the seed mix, I will be broadcasting the seed by hand after the treatment when there is a chance of moisture in the forecast. I have sand dropseed in the mix, which appears to thrive under drought conditions. If you have other seed suggestions that are more drought tolerant, I would appreciate your advice. Russian thistle is my biggest concern of secondary weeds invading post-treatment. Grafton Heritage has a section of thistle that will be sprayed this year. Most of the private land treatments are small parcel sections, and the landowners have been diligent in removing Russian thistle from their properties.
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Scott Chamberlain
Good project. I have recently had to crawl (actually crawled) through that mess trying to retrieve a duck. It will be nice to see that opened up for the cottonwoods. A suggestion for the water quality section - Maybe you could mention how tamarisk will deposit salt on the surface that is easily flushed into the river with localized rain events causing an elevated spike of sodium and other salts in the river. The Virgin river does not spike as bad as some but it is still very hard on aquatic species and downstream culinary systems.
Comment 01/31/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Thanks for the advice Scott. I have added a section in water quality to reflect this.
Comment 02/03/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Sounds like you can add waterfowl/mallard to the species benefitting list
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Thanks Gary. I will add those and some others. I kept my species list short, but there are a lot of wildlife that will benefit from this project. There is even an active mountain lion den on the TNC property.
Comment 02/01/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clare Poulsen
I really like this project and hope for it success. In your response back to Keith you asked for some suggestions to add to the seed mix. You may want to consider bottlebrush squirreltail, alkali sacaton, redtop and bluejoint reedgrass. I like them in the situation you are working in.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Thanks for the comment. I will look into these species, and adjust it if they are native to this area.
Comment 02/04/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Always like to see a riparian restoration project, especially in the desert! I look forward to seeing this one succeed. I just ask that you keep the seed mix native to the area.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Thanks for the comment. Per TNC policy, only native seed will be planted. The seed mix will be the same for the entire project.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Great, thank you!
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
One more question: What cultural surveys and tribal consultation are being conducted for this project?
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
The BLM section is fully approved to conduct the proposed treatment, all necessary NEPA has been completed. No further clearances are required. For the private lands, no cultural clearance is required since it is a hand treatment. Crews will be instructed on a Monitor and/or Discovery Protocol and provided Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to treatment. If any cultural resources are encountered during the implementation phase of our project, we will move work to another location and have an archaeologist assess the discovery. At this time no tribal consultation has occurred, since the treatment is limited to the historic flood plain of the river.
Comment 08/28/2024 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Thank you for submitting your completion form on time. It looks pretty good. Will you just add some background details of the "why" for this project? Thanks!
Comment 09/09/2024 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Stan - Thanks for adding that detail. I know this isn't your project originally so I am going to go ahead and move it to completed, but if you do have some after pictures or take some please add those in. Thanks.
Completion
Start Date:
09/06/2022
End Date:
03/27/2023
FY Implemented:
2023
Final Methods:
The Virgin River is unique river system that flows through Zion National Park, several communities, provides water to the fast growing communities in US, and critical wildlife habitat for several threaten species. Russian Olive and tamarisk have invaded this system, taking over riparian areas and decreasing native vegetation and have change river morphology. Removal of these species and reintroducing native vegetation will improve riparian healthy, river system funiction and ecology. Areas treated had 100% removal of Russian olive and tamarisk. Cut stump methods were used, with herbicide applied directly to the stumps. Cut material was piled to burn. A total of 400 willows were planted with cuttings collected from Santa Clara by ACE crews. Seed was applied in the spring using hand seeders, and raked into the soil to increase germination rates.
Project Narrative:
FFSL contacted 27 landowners and treated acres on privately owned lands. All acres treated used the cut stump method. Areas with minimal slash material near homes were chipped or hauled to the landfill. All other slash was piled for burning. Landowners continue to monitor and treat any resprouts. Utah Conservation Crews were contracted at the rate of $4,250/ week for a total of 12 weeks. Fall treatments occurred 9/6/2022- 11/8/2022, totaling 10 weeks of work. Weather conditions varied causing delays with extreme heat days, flash flooding, and rainstorms. Spring treatments occurred 3/20/2023- 3/27/2023 with 2 UCC crews to finishing the remaining hours on the contract. UCC worked on BLM and TNC lands, focusing on areas that connected past treatments first. Remaining week completed by UCC in Fall, treating any resprouts. Hurricane Fire cut and piled an additional acre of standing dead Russian olive and tamarisk near the town of Grafton. They have been conducting prescribed burns to remove the slash piles created from the projects. ACE crews collected 400 willow cuttings from Santa Clara River. FFSL planted these cuttings along BLM, TNC, and Grafton Heritage owned properties. Treated areas were hand seeded in the spring. An additional 100 3X4 inch seed packets were given out to surrounding landowners as a reminder for landowners to continue to remove Russian olive and tamarisk resprouts.
Future Management:
This project will require multiple phases. This phase prioritized upriver areas that connected past treatments for treatment longevity. Due to the density of tamarisk and Russian olive, future management will be needed to complete invasive species removal on the western BLM section and the remainder of the TNC property. Natural flooding is expected to continue to reduce invasive species establishment, helping with the longevity of this project. Nonetheless, continued monitoring and management of treated areas will reduce the future costs and prolong the effectiveness of this treatment. Hurricane Fire will continue to burn slash piles that were created in the spring. Private landowners have been educated about invasive species removal and are encouraged to retreat any resprouts on their property. The Town of Springdale is seeking additional funding sources to expand and prolong the upriver treatments.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
11319 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11319 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11319 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
11337 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11337 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11337 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
11337 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Seeding
11345 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11345 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11345 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
11349 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11349 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11350 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11350 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11351 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Ground
11351 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11351 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Pole planting/cuttings
11354 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11354 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
11355 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Herbicide application Spot treatment
11355 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Vegetation Improvements Manual removal / hand crew
Project Map
Project Map