Boulder Wetlands Restoration Project Phase III
Project ID: 6072
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: 360
Project Manager: Clint Wirick
PM Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
PM Office: Partners for Fish and Wildlife
Lead: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
Create several small emergent wetland basins in natural drainages and saturated soils.
Location:
North end of Boulder Utah on east side of Highway 12.
Project Need
Need For Project:
PREVIOUS PHASES Before I get into the need of the project I'd like to acquaint you with the incredible work already accomplished with this landowner (See attached photos/documents and please check out the video in the video tab too for complete drone footage). It's amazing what happens when you reacquaint land with water. We've been able to complete incredible wetland restorations with this landowner on land that has been dried up for maybe 150 years. The completed areas restored are buzzing with insects, amphibians, birds, bats, elk, deer, turkeys, and beavers. Not to mention the ground water recharge, water filtration, and temperature cooling processes happening. We've completed 24+ wetlands of varying shapes, sizes, and depth with maybe 40-50 acres of wetted hydric wetland soils. This is a big deal in Desert Southern Utah, I'm yet to see another wetland restoration project of this size here. INTRODUCTION Today, less than 1% of Utah's total land is wetlands. Seventy-five percent of these remaining wetlands are part of the Greater Great Salt Lake Ecosystem. In Southern Utah not only are wetlands rare, they are ultra-rare, making up an extremely small portion of the landscape. Having said this wetlands are disproportionally important on the landscape. Habitats near water -- streamsides, wet meadows and wetlands -- support the greatest variety of animal and plant life, and attract wildlife during their daily and seasonal movements. In a water-scarce landscape like Utah, these lush habitats are also where people have naturally settled. As stated, wetland habitat is the rarest type of habitat in Utah, yet the role of wetland habitat on the landscape is substantial. Within Utah, 66-75% of all bird species use mesic habitats during some portion of their life history. Typically, diversity and abundance of birds dramatically increases in western mesic habitat compared with other habitat types(Utah Partners in Flight Avian Conservation Strategy 2.0, 2002). Other research shows that 60--80% of wildlife are dependent on mesic habitats (e.g., wetlands and riparian areas; Thomas et al. 1979, Patten 1998, Belsky et al. 1999, Peck and Lovvorn 2001). In Utah it is said as much as 80% of mesic habitat occurs on private lands. These private mesic lands critically important to the health of wildlife populations across public and private lands. If true wildlife conservation is to take place on a sustainable level, public wildlife managers must engage private landowners. It is important that we continue to work in these areas that are critically important to the landscape around them, and because these wet areas are mostly private it is extremely important to work with private landowners restoring these areas whenever possible. Wet habitat is the zipper that ties the ecology of the surrounding landscapes together. Not working in these wet areas puts adjacent habitat and wildlife at risk. Climate change has come to the forefront as a global threat to humans and wildlife alike. Although models vary on future impacts of global climate change one thing stands out is that water may become more scarce in the West. Preserving and restoring wet areas has been identified as a key way to mitigate impacts like drought, increasing temperatures, and other impacts that a changing climate will have on humans and wildlife. The importance of wetlands cannot be overstated, especially in a water starved landscape like Utah and in the midst climate change and drought. PROVEN CONCEPT This project is phase III of wetland restoration with this particular landowner. Previous work has been an incredible success due to many partners and a committed landowner. A WORD ON POLLINATORS Yep, we're claiming pollinators so hear us out. Some of the most forb diverse habitats are those around water. By improving uplands to benefit riparian areas we are improving pollinator habitat. Furthermore, conservationists are coming to realize the importance of late season forb vegetation for migrating monarch butterflies. If you don't know, monarchs are a USFWS candidate species. Late season food sources are necessary to get them through migration and to winter habitats in Mexico and California. Wetted habitats have those late season nectar sources. NOW A WORD ON GAME SPECIES This particular property is a very important to elk, mule deer, and wild turkeys on the Boulder Unit. These species use this property as stopover habitat as they migrate to and from summer ranges.
Objectives:
Grazing * Concentrate surface and subsurface water from springs into wetland depressions to maximize rotational grazing capacity. Natural Wetland Concepts * Construct wetland depressions mimicking natural wetlands (not deep fishing ponds) at varying sizes, depths, and shapes to maximize the diversity in habitat types and maximize the diversity of wildlife benefiting.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
There are many ecological threats one could list here. With the added emphasis of why WRI needs to fund this project now and not later I will say only this. Drought, climate change, rising temperatures, water shortages, and threats relating to precipitation timing and amounts are are disrupting natural ecologies and human systems such as agriculture and economies. We need to act immediately whenever the opportunity arises to work with the public in restoring mesic habitats. The opportunity might not be there next year.
Relation To Management Plan:
1. Utah Mule Deer Statewide Plan (12/5/2019-12/5/2024) "Work with local, state and federal land management agencies via land management plans and with private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deer habitats, especially fawning, wintering, and migration areas" "Work with local, state and federal land management agencies and ranchers to properly manage livestock to enhance crucial mule deer ranges." "Minimize impacts and recommend mitigation for losses of crucial habitat due to human impacts." "Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats throughout Utah." "Support existing and explore additional incentive programs for landowners that will increase tolerance, enhance habitat, and promote deer populations on private lands such as the CWMU, landowner permit, Walk-In Access programs, etc." This project falls in the Crucial Mule Deer Habitat Priorities. 2. Deer Herd Unit Management Plan, Deer Herd Boulder Mountain "A major proportion of both summer and winter habitat for deer on this unit is on private land. Therefore, it is paramount to work with private landowners to maintain both summer and winter habitat. 3. Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan * "Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat.' * "Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional Watershed Restoration Initiative working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats that are in need of enhancement or restoration. i) Identify habitat projects on summer ranges (aspen communities) to improve calving habitat. ii) Encourage land managers to manage portions of forests in early succession stages through the use controlled burning and logging. Controlled burning should only be used in areas with minimal invasive weed and/or safety concerns." 4. USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Strategic Plan "Project addresses habitat threats for a priority species within a PFW priority area (Plateau Focus Area) for restoration work." 5. Intermountain West Joint Venture Habitat Conservation Strategy "Support existing public-private partnerships to implement sagebrush habitat conservation, at regional, state, and local scales." "Remove encroaching conifers to functionally restore sagebrush habitat." 6. Utah Wildlife Action Plan "Wetland habitat is a key habitat identified in the WAP." "This project will be addressing threats to species identified in the WAP of greatest conservation need." 7. State of Utah Resource Management Plan "Develop mechanisms and policies to incentivize private landowners throughout Utah to conserve valuable wildlife habitat throughout Utah." 8. Utah Partners in Flight Avian Conservation Strategy Version 2.0 "Lowland riparian habitat conservation is identified as being critical for several species of songbirds for breeding habitat." 9.State of Utah Resource Management Plan "Conserve, improve, and restore 500,000 acres of mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges." "Protect existing wildlife habitat and improve 500,000 acres of critical habitats and watersheds throughout the state by 2025" 10.Utah Wild Turkey Management Plan "Maintain and improve wild turkey populations to habitat or social carrying capacity" Objective1.Stabilize populations that are declining outside of natural population fluctuations; especially through catastrophic events (i.e. following fires, severe winters, etc.). Strategy c: Conduct habitat projects to address limiting factors. Objective 2.Increase wild turkey habitat, quality and quantity, by 40,000 acres statewide by 2020. Strategy d: Conduct habitat improvement projects in limiting habitat(s).
Fire / Fuels:
The current fire regime condition class for the project site and surrounding area is moderate (2) to low (1). Reducing the threat of wildfire is important because of the critical nature of this habitat to upland game, big game, birds, and fish. At first glance the project doesn't seem to have the large benefits of reducing catastrophic fire because most of the restoration activities will be in the pastures and wet meadow habitat. To that, I say think again ;). Areas like these rivers, floodplains, wetlands, and meadows serve as buffers, greenstrips, and/or firebreaks that can be critically important in defending landscapes against large fires and protecting adjacent habitat. Anytime we can increase surface water through wetland restoration we strengthen our natural wildfire buffers. Also wet areas like these can themselves become at greater risk of fire due to degradation like channel downcutting and decrease in water table elevation which leads to changes in vegetation and drier conditions. This project will protect, restore, and enhance these wet areas and decrease fire risk from moderate (2) to low (1). Also by reducing the fire risk (and maintaining the low risk) on the project site and surrounding area we are protecting extremely valuable land types (riparian and wetland) that are critically important to both wildlife and the communities that surround them. Riparian, wetlands, and stream habitat is also very important for filtering heavy sediment, ash, and other compounds from post-fire areas in adjacent upland and up stream habitat. Protecting wetland and riparian habitat protects the watershed from off-site negative impacts to both rural communities and wildlife.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Riparian, wetlands, and stream habitat is extremely important for filtering heavy sediment, ash, and other compounds from post-fire areas in adjacent upland and up stream habitat. Protecting wetland and riparian habitat protects the watershed from off-site negative impacts to both rural communities and wildlife. This project will help directly with water quantity and storage. It is universal knowledge through many years of research that healthy, properly functioning wetland habitat has the capacity to store more water in the soil and below ground aquifer. This storage capacity becomes even more apparent during the driest parts of the season or during drought when these areas put more water back into the aquatic system because of the "sponge effect" they have the ability to store larger capacities of water.
Compliance:
All the necessary compliance and permits will be obtained before work starts.
Methods:
A naturally appearing and functioning mosaic of emergent, ephemeral, and wet-meadow wetlands would be restored to improve habitat for wildlife on the site. Heavy equipment such as an excavator will be used to fill ditches, contour soil, and remove soil as needed to restore wetlands. Heavy equipment would be cleaned prior to restoration to avoid introducing non-native plants. Slopes may be changed to return natural sheet and braided flow patterns between the wetlands. Spillways and buried vertical grade control structures would be used to protect the wetlands from being destroyed by erosional head-cuts. The wetlands will be restored without using these features that appear unnatural, and require maintenance: 1. No water control structures would be used. 2. No pipes would be used. 3. No pumps would be used. 4. No aerators would be used. 5. No above ground dams would be built. See some of the photos from previous phase. Seeding and planting may occur in and around disturbed soils. Excavator 100 or 200 Series Minimum 60-inch wide bucket (1.0yd³) or larger 140HP Net or greater 46,000lbs or greater Ground pressure no greater than 4.9 PSI (This is critical to staying afloat, minimizing the use of logs) Working thumb attachment
Monitoring:
Photopoint monitoring is always a good visual means of depicting progress of projects. And will be used on this project. We have aerial drone fight (photo and video) of the project area before and will do the same after in 3 years. USFWS would like to work with the UDWR non-game biologist for song bird, amphibian, and bat surveys. Can and will upload any data and reports to WRI database for completion reports. USFWS will conduct annual site visits to assess successes and future needs with the landowner/land manager as part of the USFWS contract.
Partners:
PRIVATE LANDOWNER This landowner wants to manage his properties to maximize wildlife, ecological function, and sustainability. He has spent considerable amounts of money (no need to disclose amounts but it is more than you and I make in a year) implementing phase I and phase II. TROUT UNLIMITED Jordan Neilson with TU has been a large part of this project on all phases of the project throughout the years. He has provided invaluable technical and organizational support. USFWS PARTNERS PROGRAM The Partners Program has been working with this landowner for several years on many phases of this project and others. WATERSHED ARTISIANS Craig Spondtholtz of New Mexico has provided technical advice, surveys, monitoring, engineering, and also implementation on this and other phases.
Future Management:
The private landowners will enter into a Landowner Agreement with USFWS. As part of the landowner agreement with USFWS the landowner agrees to leave the habitat restored in place for at least a 10 year period and during that time will work with the USFWS biologist to monitor and access needs, success, and any needed adaptive management. The landonwer has done other habitat work with USFWS and partners and delivered projects as agreed to.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Here is where I would like to emphasize the diversity of what this landowner does. They aren't your typical landowner. One aspect of what they do is sustainable grassfed beef. Since aquiring properties in Boulder they've worked extensively with agencies, NGO's, and researchers to improve soil health and plant diversity on pastures for sustainable grazing. They've improved water delivery and irrigation practices. They've developed rotational grazing practices. All this with the goal of providing local communities and restraunts locally sourced beef while improving the ecological integrity of the properties. The landowner also runs a guest ranch and restraunt. This business attracts people from all over the world (side note, Scarlett Johansson and Colin Jost got engaged here in 2020 - I like SNL so I thought this is cool). Part of what they do is they want to highlight their operation as a self-sustaining, low impact business while improving natural ecology of the area. They also hold concerts, habitat restoration workshops, conferences, community celebrations, sustainable gardening workshops, and all kinds of gatherings and learning experiences on the ranch. The area and guest ranch attracts recreationists of all types. Hikers, canyoneering, hunting, fishing, and all types of people come and stay at the ranch and in nearby camping areas. The landowners do allow limited hunting on the property for elk, mule deer, and turkey.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$83,200.00 $10,000.00 $93,200.00 $9,160.00 $102,360.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Contractual Services Estimated cost to hire contractor to complete work. Cost include mobilization, equipment time, logs for platform in saturated soil, excavation and berm building and ground water dams. $75,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Project Management $4,000.00 $0.00 $9,160.00 2023
Other Indirect Costs (10%) $4,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$83,200.00 $0.00 $83,200.00 $9,160.00 $92,360.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2023
Trout Unlimited $0.00 $0.00 $4,160.00 2023
Habitat Council Account QHCR $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) S024 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Safari Club International (SCI) S026 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
DNR Watershed U004 $53,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Elk R2
Threat Impact
Droughts Low
Wild Turkey R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Northern Leopard Frog N5
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Spotted Bat N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Medium
Townsend's Big-eared Bat N3
Threat Impact
Not Listed NA
Waterfowl
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Monarch butterfly N3
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Habitats
Habitat
Emergent
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Emergent
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration Unknown
Project Comments
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
On future management I have a question. What does the Landowner agreement with USFWS entail for grazing and management of the property? Doesn't need to be a detailed novel but a short synopsis if possible would be appreciated. Thanks
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
Is there any collar data suggesting the utilization with Mule Deer & Elk ?
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
none that I could tell given the current GPS information for the area.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Good question. There are implementing some serious high intensity rotational grazing. I say serious because they are not just saying it but not really doing it. They are using electric fence and other tools to move cows like every 1-3 days depending. They've done a ton of work previous to setting up this grazing plan to improve vegetation and soil with breaking up compaction, injecting compost tea, seeding.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Carrie Howard
Wow. Your repeat photo points really highlights the species diversity this project can accomplish. Were there any opportunities to expand this project to neighboring FS lands?
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Yea the FS lands are pretty much rocky steep conifer hillsides so not really for this kind of work. Glad you could see what I was trying to project in some of the photos. I was having a hard time getting them to load in WRI (still am). Please look at the docs and video if you haven't thanks.
Comment 01/21/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Stan Gurley
We are always looking to expand out project boundaries. As you can see from the pictures, the uplands have reach ecological thresholds, but we are waiting for land management agencies to go through their processes. We hope to partner in the future and always, we support the large scale NEPA and watershed restoration.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
This seems like a really great project! I love to hear about landowners interested and able to do this type of restoration work. I'd also like a bit more info on post-project management and longevity. You state that there's an agreement b/w the landowner and USFWS to leave the restored wetlands in place for at least 10 years. This doesn't seem like a very long time. What happens after 10 years? I also have a question about species. The provided project design and report mentions creating habitat for a number of species that are not included in the Project Details, including:Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus * Bluehead sucker * Boreal Toad * Columbia Spotted Frog * Colorado River Cutthroat Trout * Lowland Leopard Frog Is there a plan to introduce these species? Or is the intent that they will re-populate this area?
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Yea the 10 year agreements are our standard agreements. What happens after 10 years? It's private land and we know they can do what they want but what we've found is after a commitment of 10 years most continue to manage the habitat they've restored. We actually just had a peer reviewed study finished looking at this very thing at our 8 state regional level and they found most landowner continued managing with implemented conservation practices waaaayyyy beyond our 10 year agreements. The report you refer to is really good but you are right there are species found in it not listed in my species benefitting. The report was done by a consultant the landowner hired to design the first phase of the wetland projects. Tom Beibighauser (sp?). Really great and knowledgeable guy. His report was more of a bigger picture report based on species in the area. Stick to my species list for species benefitting this particular project. We won't be doing any re-introductions as of now. If I was to say anything was a possibility of re-introducing maybe the amphibians like spotted frog. Hopefully that all made sense.
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
I also have the same question as Carrie - were opportunities to expand this project across boundaries explored?
Comment 01/20/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Explored yes kinda maybe. Really there aren't opportunities right adjacent for wetland work. Most the meadows and anything with water is private, when you hit forest it turns into steep rocky shallow soils with shrubs and conifers.
Comment 01/21/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Mindy Wheeler
Hey Clint- This could be a great opportunity (?) to work with UDAF/ NRCS pollinator bill stuff - now that the monarch is an SGCN. We are hoping to bulk up on appropriate pollinator plants and seed - don't know if the landowner would be open to milkweed..? but we are working on some others..??
Comment 01/21/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
The landowner is more than open to milkweed and all about pollinators. I've talked with Bowcutt about the UDAF funds now available for pollinators too. Thanks for reminding me, this would be a good one.
Comment 01/26/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
Mindy, top of the morning to you. I would highly discourage introducing milkweed in area livestock will be grazing. Milkweed is highly toxic to livestock, especially in a scenario they are intensively grazing on a rotational schedule. Trust me I have lost hundreds of animals in my life due to milkweed. Securing pollinator seed from UDAF is a possibility as this project progresses.
Comment 01/26/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
You make a good point Jake and something to consider. The past phases he doesn't consistently use as a pasture for grazing. We seeded a bunch of milkweed there. The landowner actually would love to plant milkweed here but we need to discuss if it is appropriate based on management now and post-restoration.
Comment 01/21/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
To whomever reads this. I failed to emphasize NRCS as a partner past and hopefully future. They've used NRCS funds for pasture improvements, irrigation, and upland seedings.
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Clint, I don't understand how you are improving water quantity without the soil moisture benefit of PJ destruction. It just sounds totally made up to me. Seriously, great project. I was on that property about 10 years ago and the area you have drone footage of was pretty beat up irrigated pasture from my recollection. Well done. Just FYI the FS is in preliminary panning stages for some fuels and forest health treatments on our side of the fence in that area. Probably at least 2 years out on the planning process. Supposedly we should be getting some TNC LCF data for the area within the next year, too. This is my pitch for you to take me on a tour so I can squeeze fish with the Black Widow!!
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Haha, what do I know about water benefits. Your recollection of the fields is correct. Leveled, beat and not a wetland. It is crazy different now. I really would love to take anyone and everyone on a tour of the place. I don't know if I can get the Black Widow though, she won't return my calls.
Comment 03/14/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Amanda Barth
I took a look at the project details and location to get an idea of how this action might benefit monarchs or western bumble bees. As a wetland restoration project, this could certainly pose a potential benefit for monarchs. Recent records for monarch activity and milkweed presence (through the Western Monarch Milkweed Mapper regional database) show suitable habitat as close as Boulder. However, this elevation and habitat type is not suitable at all for western bumble bees, which need more subalpine meadow habitat for nesting sites and generally occur in Utah above 8000 feet these days. There's no potential for this project to benefit WBB. If you'd like to help contribute any monarch sightings to our statewide data collection project, Utah Pollinator Pursuit (late April-late September), let me know and I can provide more info on getting involved.
Comment 03/16/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Clint Wirick
Thanks for looking and adding some comments. Thanks a ton for the comments on WBB. It really helps. I already contribute to the statewide data collection of monarchs. I'd like to talk sometime. I'm trying to remember if we've ever met???
Comment 02/09/2022 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
Clint - Would you re-upload your map features as aquatic/riparian treatments? You select the lake/wetland/pond improvement action and all of the treatments that apply to what you are doing in the area. You will need to add multiple actions so you can select multiple treatments (dredging, new ponds, embankments, etc.) Thanks.
Comment 08/24/2023 Type: 2 Commenter: Daniel Eddington
Thank you for submitting your completion form on time. It looks great. Thanks for uploading pictures!
Completion
Start Date:
04/08/2023
End Date:
04/22/2023
FY Implemented:
2023
Final Methods:
Experienced private contractor/consultant was hired, Watershed Artisians. This is the same contractor who has worked with us on the property during Phases 1 & 2. Undertaking and Methods 1) Wetland depressions. Soil was excavated and shaped into naturally appearing and functioning emergent and ephemeral wetlands. 2) Groundwater dams. Underground dams were placed at strategic locations to restore elevation of groundwater in wetlands. These were narrow bands of compacted clay soil, formed underground that interrupts permeable layers of soil. They were placed in along the lower edges of wetlands. 3) Spillways. Naturally appearing and functioning spillways were used to transition water from wetland to wetland. 4) Large woody debris. Large diameter logs, branches, and root masses were placed in the wetlands to improve habitat for a diversity of plant and wildlife species. 6) Planting and seeding. Native desirable species were planted and seeded in newly formed wetlands and other disturbed sites. Restored wetted soils/wetland footprint is actually larger than just the wetland dugouts. Restoration work restored adjacent soil hydrology around the wetlands as well.
Project Narrative:
The Headwaters Ranch is located between the Escalante-Grand Staircase National Monument and the Boulder Mountain Range. The ranch sits at the base of the southern side of the Boulder Mountain Range. The property is made up primarily of pasture fields and wooded slopes. The landowner wishes to provide wildlife habitat and preserve ecological integrity on the property. The site proposed for wetland restoration is located in intensively managed and manipulated fields used for grazing pastures. The landowner has recently purchased the property and is interested in using a more holistic management approach to the property. The fields historically were leveled in an effort to dry out low wet spots and irrigate. The fields prior to human manipulation were likely more diverse in topography with a mosaic of wet meadows in low areas and potentially some seasonal and ephemeral wetlands. Under this agreement USFWS will work with the landowner to restore natural topography in targeted areas by excavating historic fill material in low spots to create small shallow season and ephemeral wetlands. No running water exist on site and wetland depressions are designed to slow natural runoff and create a more naturally connected groundwater hydrology. The project would restore key features of natural wetlands such as the elevation of groundwater, presence of shallow water depressions, hydric soils, non-compacted soils, tufts, mounds, ridges, and native plants that were present before landscape manipulation took place. The wetlands would be restored to provide habitat to a diversity of animals and plants. Features would be restored in and around the wetlands to support a diversity of amphibians, birds, invertebrates, and mammals. The landowner is working with Craig Sponholtz (Watershed Arisians), Utah Division of Wildlife, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Utah Watershed Restoration Initiative, Trout Unlimited, and USFWS for design and implementation.
Future Management:
The landowner has had a keen interest in restoring, enhancing, and preserving ecological integrity on this and other properties around Boulder, Utah. The landowner is a long time USFWS Partners Program participant and has several landowner agreements with USFWS for habitat restoration. Under these agreements the landowner commits to several things, one of them being to leave the restored habitat in place for a minimum of 10 years. During those 10 years a USFWS biologist will remain in contact with the landowner and make periodic site visits.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
12932 Aquatic/Riparian Treatment Area Lake/Wetland/Pond Improvements Excavation
Project Map
Project Map