Project Need
Need For Project:
During the last 20 years several water developments have occurred on Panguitch Lake herd unit in response to vegetation projects. Past and upcoming vegetation management projects have and will improved wildlife forage capacity and overall habitat effectiveness by removing encroaching conifers from the ecosystem. Water is still one of the limiting factors on this unit. Several water sources (guzzlers) have been planned to be placed where they can be utilized with existing tree cover while providing access to the treatment area. As demand for water use has increased all over the Great Basin, water sources for wildlife have decreased. There is a need to increase water availability across rangelands for both livestock and wildlife needs. The purpose of the proposed guzzlers is to provide a dedicated source of water for wildlife, improving suitability, and reducing competition between resources for water. Providing a secure water source for wildlife reduces stress on populations and provides for the necessary habitat security for consistent use of the habitat. Distributing wildlife across the landscape helps reduce the risk of disease transmission in localized populations.
Guzzlers that have been installed in year past are also in need of some serious maintenance, many of them need fences repaired, or installed. Others need various parts replaced to allow for water to be collected or retained.
Objectives:
The water developments will consist of guzzlers designed for rain water collection and storage in holding tanks up to 2,500 gallons. Water will be dispersed through a drinker designed for wildlife use. The objectives are to disperse water in drier habitat areas where it can facilitate better use of the existing habitat. An overflow design may also be incorporated that would distribute water to livestock, but wildlife and livestock drinkers would be separate, with livestock being fenced out of the wildlife drinker box.
Replace parts and fences and preform maintenance on previously installed guzzlers.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
As local wildlife populations expand so does the human interaction within surrounding habitats. As humans interact and disturb existing populations wildlife become pushed into less desirable locations or into locations that lack all of the necessary resources such as water. In other cases where habitat is improved and forage capacities are returned to better conditions more wildlife can be supported if the critical resources such as water are also available. Guzzlers frequently fill this niche and help offset some of the pressures from disturbance or help facilitate better use of new forage. Placing guzzlers in these drier sites helps facilitate the use by wildlife in these areas where habitat effectiveness is normally limited. In most cases the water will support many sensitive species as well as big-game populations. Many of the existing guzzlers sites are currently providing water to at-risk species such as sage grouse. In all areas, monitoring shows that drinkers provide water for a variety of non-game animals, birds, bats, and large animals.
Relation To Management Plan:
The proposed project is consistent with and supported by the following management plans:
1) Dixie National Forest - Land and Resource Management plan - pp. IV-84, Standard: A. Maintain habitat capability at a level at least 80 % of potential capability for all emphasized species. And. pp. IV-112, 6A management direction, (1) Maintain and manage forested inclusions to provide a high level of forage production, wildlife habitat, and diversity.
2) Garfield County current desired future conditions and Draft resource management plan. pp. 5 Wildlife Goal: Prior to December 31, 2025, land managers will seek to have habitats supporting important fish and wildlife species.
3) Utah Statewide Elk Management Plan pp. 16, Strategies: C. Watershed Restoration Initiative, a) Increase forage production by annually treating a minimum of 40,000 acres of elk habitat. and b) Coordinate with land management agencies, conservation organizations, private landowners, and local leaders through the regional WRI working groups to identify and prioritize elk habitats in need of enhancement or restoration.
4)Elk management plan (28 Panguitch Lake): pp.3: Unit Habitat Objectives: Continue projects with USFS, BLM, state and private entities to enhance habitat across the unit. Encourage the maintenance and development of water sources throughout the unit. Focus on providing water sources in remote areas or on abandoned/sources such as old water troughs, ponds, and tanks that can benefit both livestock and wildlife.
5) Utah Mule Deer Statewide management plan, Dec 01 2014. pp.18 - Habitat Goal: Conserve, improve, and restore mule deer habitat throughout the state with emphasis on crucial ranges.
Habitat Objective 1: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the state by protecting and
enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts. Strategies: c. Work with local, state and federal land management agencies via land managementplans and with private landowners to identify and properly manage crucial mule deerhabitats, especially fawning, wintering and migration areas.
D. Minimize impacts and recommend mitigation for losses of crucial habitat due to human impacts.
Habitat Objective 2: Improve the quality and quantity of vegetation for mule deer on a
minimum of 500,000 acres of crucial range by 2019.
e. Continue to support and provide leadership for the Utah Watershed Restoration
Initiative, which emphasizes improving sagebrush-steppe, aspen, and riparian habitats
throughout Utah.
g. Encourage land managers to manage portions of pinion-juniper woodlands and
aspen/conifer forests in early successional stages using various methods including
timber harvest and managed fire.
6)Deer herd and unit management plan, Deer Herd Unit # 28, (Panguitch Lake) pp 3: Maintain mule deer habitat throughout the unit by protecting and enhancing existing crucial habitats and mitigating for losses due to natural and human impacts.
Fire / Fuels:
Guzzlers will help wildlife better utilize existing habitat types. In some areas fuels are increased because wildlife and livestock do not have access to the forage due to the lack of water availability in the area. The placement of guzzlers into these types of areas will help reduce fuels as wildlife better utilize the existing forage.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Adding guzzlers to existing habitat helps improve water quality by distributing wildlife across the landscape. Large game animals such as elk and mule deer may concentrate on a single water resource when water is scarce. Additional water sources such as guzzlers and ponds help distribute wildlife across the landscape which allows them to better utilize the existing forage but also alleviates impacts from concentration areas.
Compliance:
NEPA has been conducted and a Decision Memo was issued in the Fall of 2017 approving the placement of these guzzlers on National Forest System lands. All sites have had Archaeological and cultural clearances. Utah law allows for construction of guzzlers under 2,500-gallon capacity with a simple rain water harvesting permit, without a water right. Guzzlers were approved up to 2,500-gallon capacity to be consistent with Utah state law. https://www.waterrights.utah.gov/forms/rainwater.asp
Methods:
Dixie National Forest biologist prefer to utilize 1800 gallon boss tanks and their catchment kit due to their low maintenance needs and ease of installation. It is proposed to purchase 1 guzzler and 2 catchment kits and transport them from the manufacturer to Cedar City Utah where they will be distributed from there to various sites.
Monitoring:
Guzzlers are monitored annually by USFS biologist for maintenance needs. Utilization is monitored with remote trail cameras. These Boss tanks have been used on other ranger districts with good success. We expect to see good success from these guzzlers after instillation.
Partners:
Partners include Dedicated Hunters, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Local Sportsmens for Fish and Wildlife groups, Mule Deer Foundation, and National Wild Turkey Federation, and Boy Scouts of America. In the past, proposed projects have generated interest from local youth as an Eagle scout project.
Future Management:
Future management includes constant monitoring to ensure drinkers stay functional and are maintained annually. Biologist monitor existing sites now and conduct maintenance when necessary. In addition, there are 5 other approved sites on the Dixie National Forest, Cedar City Ranger District that we will be seeking additional funding for in the future.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Livestock benefit from the placement of these guzzlers as most sites will have an overflow into a pond or trough that facilitates livestock use. Excess rainwater harvested then allows for livestock to better utilize the surrounding forage.