Red Cliffs Reserve - State Land Rejuvra Treatment
Project ID: 6090
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2023
Submitted By: N/A
Project Manager: Curtis Roundy
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southern Region
Lead: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
In 2020 the Turkey Farm Road Fire burned on and adjacent to this project area. Since the fire there has been significant cheatgrass invasion, suppressing the native plant community. Rejuvra has demonstrated control on cheatgrass in areas with intact vegetative communities and a strong release of those species as the cheatgrass suppression is removed. This project will use rejuvra on a large scale to release the vegetative communities from the cheatgrass suppression.
Location:
This project will be implemented on the state owned land that is within and adjacent to the 2020 Turkey Farm Road Fire. The land sits on the south end of the Pine Valley Mountains adjacent to the St. George and Washington cities, within Washington county. The treatments are generally between 3,000 and 4,500 feet elevation.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Invasive, fine textured fuels, primarily consisting of red brome (Bromus rubens) and cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), fueled a moderate to high intensity wildfire in the summer of 2020. The Turkey Farm Road fire consumed both the shrub canopy and understory vegetation. Soils within the burn are left exposed to wind and water erosion and are now susceptible to invasion by noxious weeds and to the spread of cheatgrass and other non-native annual species. The soils within the fire area have been mapped and described as part of an official soil survey, completed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). The Turkey Farm Road fire has been classified as "moderately susceptible" to fire damage for the most part indicating that the soil within the burn has features that are moderately favorable for damage to occur. This rating is also directly related to burn severity, which in this case was moderate to high. Therefore, soils within the burn site could be classified as "moderately" to "highly" susceptible for damage to occur after the fire. Based on these findings, past fire history in similar areas, and visits to the burned area, protecting the watershed values and reducing the erosion potential within wildlife habitat would be a priority for the Turkey Farm Road ESR project, and this project is a follow up to treatments that didn't happen in conjunction to the original project. Additionally, containment and control of invasive, non-native species, such as cheatgrass, which may exacerbate erosion potential and fire frequency and severity that would further degrade habitat is also a very high priority. For these reasons we feel it is necessary to spray the herbicide rejuvra onto this site to help with cheatgrass infestations that have already begun and allow the native vegetation to have the competitive advantage. Specifically the proposal is to treat 2 different types of areas. The first is an area that burned in the turkey farm fire and has shown good recovery with native vegetation well on its way to re-establishing, but early evidence of cheatgrass and red brome re-introduction is also there and we desire to decrease its competition with the recovering native vegetation. The second is intact vegetation directly adjacent to the burned area with significant cheatgrass and red brome encroachment. This will allow us to protect the unburned areas from future fires while enhancing the already existing vegetation.
Objectives:
1. Release re-establishing native vegetation from competition from cheatgrass and red brome. 2. Remove cheatgrass and redbrome from intact native vegetation and reduce likelihood of future fires thereby protecting unburned desert tortoise habitat. 3. Reduce sedimentation and erosion.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Cheatgrass has high probability of returning and re-establishing before other plant species due to the nature of this annual grass. As this happens, other plant species struggle to re-establish, which results in the landscape being dominated by cheatgrass. If the area is not rehabilitated with the application of rejuvra or another cheatgrass control, it is expected that a pattern of more fires similar to the Turkey Farm Road Fire will continue to occur within the area. This will in turn result in additional soil loss due to runoff during storm events post fire. This silt and soil loss ends up in the Virgin River and has negative impacts the the protected and endangered fish species. By controlling cheatgrass and the resulting fire cycles we are in turn helping to protect and preserve from future disturbance the River System in which these fish live. Mojave Desert Tortoise are listed as threatened under the ESA and one of the major threats to their habitat is the reduction of fire return intervals due to the increase of invasives like red brome and cheatgrass. It is important to learn how to rehabilitate burned areas to break that fire cycle as well as to protect unburned areas from moving into that cycle of increased frequency of fires.
Relation To Management Plan:
This action is consistent with the following land use plans and the Normal Year Fire Management Plan. LUP Name: Red Cliffs National Conservation Area Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (ROD/RMP). Date Approved December 2016. Other relevant Plans and associated NEPA analyses (copies available at BLM's St. George Field Office): Dixie Resource Area Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Oct. 1995, Dixie Resource Area Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement; Sept. 1998, Vegetation Treatment on BLM Lands in Thirteen Western States/FEIS; May, 1991 and associated ROD July, 1991 Vegetation PEIS ROD 2007 The Proposed Action is in conformance with the approved Red Cliffs National Conservation Area RMP/ROD because it is specifically provided for in the following management decisions: 6.6 Native Vegetation Communities Goal- Biodiversity, ecological integrity, and ecosystem resilience are conserved, protected, and restored in the unique native vegetation communities created by the convergence of the Mojave Desert, Great Basin, and Colorado Plateau ecoregions. VEG-4: Implement landscape-level fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects in partnership with adjacent federal and state land managing agencies. VEG-5: Design fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects to conserve and protect unburned native vegetation communities, evaluating factors such as vegetation types, seasonal wind direction, and expected fire behavior in project planning. VEG-6: Design fuel breaks to incorporate topographic features, water courses, major ephemeral drainages, road networks, and utility corridors, to minimize new surface disturbances and the loss of native vegetation. VEG-7: Design fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects to utilize those methods that are environmentally sensitive and minimize new surface disturbances. VEG-9: Authorize the use of biological controls, targeted grazing, flaming, hand removal, herbicides, mechanical methods, or a combination of methods to develop fuel breaks and hazard fuel reduction projects (see Table 3 for descriptions of each method).* *Mechanical Mowing, weed-whipping, cutting (chainsaw), and brush removal. Good for small to medium-scale targets, possible negative impacts to habitat by equipment (such as soil compaction, creation of disturbed soils, burrow collapse). Treatment of hazard fuels for fire control. Removal of invasive species as pretreatment before restoration seeding. Cutting to remove exotic tree species. *Herbicides Spraying individual plants or populations, sometimes in conjunction with stump-cutting. Spraying specific project areas. Good for small to large scale projects, cost-effective weed control, essential for eradication of some problematical species. Negative impacts related to potential human and ecological exposures to chemicals. Target spraying to eradicate or control exotic annuals for hazard fuel reduction or as a means to prepare areas for restoration seeding and/or outplantings with native species. 6.9 ES&R and Other Native Vegetation Community Restoration Goal- Biodiversity, ecological integrity, and ecosystem resilience are restored in disturbed and fire-damaged native vegetation communities.
Fire / Fuels:
Cheatgrass is known for its frequent fire cycles, and by slowing the spread of this invasive grass you also lessen the chance of a fire happening in this area. This project would reduce the risk of a wildfire. This project is an FRCC class 2 currently and by treating with the prescribed methods we are hoping that it will move towards a FRCC class 1. This project is also going to protect several values at risk in the area including but not limited to the WUI interface with the adjacent community of Washington City transmission lines and infrastructure that runs around and through this corridor, as well as critical desert tortoise habitat.
Water Quality/Quantity:
This project is located in the Upper Virgin River drainage where the natural flow of water runs through the town of St. George, Utah and eventually to Lake Mead, Nevada. This restoration project will stabilize the topsoil, prevent erosion and soil loss, and reduce negative water quality effects of the Virgin River due to silting and erosion. Establishing and supporting a healthy plant community is critical to reduce erosion and protect the Upper Virgin River Basin, and will, with a normal water absorption rate and normal precipitation in the area, serve to recharge the aquifer in a very arid desert location. These water systems are prone to flash floods during precipitation events and burned areas contribute significantly to sedimentation in these flash events. Re-establishing and/or protecting areas of unburned habitat will help mitigate the sedimentation and erosion during these flash flood events.
Compliance:
Treatment will be occurring exclusively on state owned lands. There is also no ground disturbing activities planned. As such there is no NEPA or Archeology component required prior to implementation. Rejuvra, which initially was marketed as Esplenade, was rebranded as Rejuvra due to a label change allowing for use in grazed areas making it available for a more broad use.
Methods:
We plan to contract the application of the chemical to the site by means of helicopter application. DWR will purchase the chemical and provide it to the company that will be applying it. We plan to apply the chemical at the label rate (7oz/acre) to control the cheatgrass.
Monitoring:
These treatment will be monitored each year for five years (2022-2026) and an annual monitoring summary report will be completed by early September each year. A number monitoring studies in conjunction with the BLM adjacent will be established. These sites will be established in both the chaining treatment and non-chaining treatment aerially seeded sites using the AIM method, and we plan to have some of these sites fall within this rejuvra treatment area to be monitored.
Partners:
Extensive discussions have occured with multiple partners in regards to this project. We have worked with SITLA on a similar project where we applied rejuvra on an unburned state section at T-Bone Mesa during the turkey farm fire rehab and seek to continue that partnership with protecting these other unburned or re-establishing state lands. We have also discussed the use of the same idea on BLM lands with BLM staff and while they are not yet authorized to conduct similar treatments they are excited about its use on state lands and working toward authorization on BLM. Finally, Washington County has also been a good partner. They have been treating transmission corridors, trails, roads, and other right of ways in similar ways to protect from the risk of fires starting on these corridors and have expressed a desire to contribute financially to this project as well.
Future Management:
The decision of the RMP for the purpose of the Red Cliffs NCA is the following: To conserve, protect, and enhance for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations the ecological, scenic, wildlife, recreational, cultural, historical, natural, educational, and scientific resources of the National Conservation Area; and to protect each species that is located in the National Conservation Area; and listed as a threatened or endangered species on the list of threatened species or the list of endangered species published under... the Endangered Species Act of 1973. (OPLMA Section 1974 (a)) These are the goals and guides for the management of this areas presently and for the foreseeable future. Specifically, the NCA will be managed to enhance habitat for the desert tortoise. Promoting vegetation that is beneficial to provide forage and cover for this species is way management practice to accomplish this goal. Also establishing fire resistant and resilient plant species will help in the purpose of the Red Cliffs NCA. This is the management plan for the Red Cliffs NCA, and these SITLA and State Owned Lands are managed for the most part under the same management plan, with the exception that they are more flexible on the practices that are allowable and as such this is why we are able to use Rejuvra on these lands were they are currently prohibited on the Federal BLM lands that are part of the Red Cliffs NCA.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
The uses for this area are the following: To be a reserve for wildlife particularly for the threatened desert tortoise. To preserve cultural/historic sites. Also it is recreational area for public use with a trail system for biking, hiking, and horse back riding. As range land the area serves as a watershed resouces when vegetation conditions are healthy and functioning. When soil erosion is mitigated and water from precipitation inflitrates soil the range land is functioning properly.
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$102,340.00 $0.00 $102,340.00 $3,750.00 $106,090.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Materials and Supplies 70 Gallons of Rejuvra Chemical $77,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Contractual Services Aerial Application contract for 1267 acres @ $20/acre $25,340.00 $0.00 $0.00 2023
Personal Services (permanent employee) Permanent Employee to plan, contract, and inspect project implementation. $0.00 $0.00 $3,750.00 2023
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $3,750.00 $28,750.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Washington Co. Water Conservancy District T226 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) $0.00 $0.00 $3,750.00 2023
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Black-tailed Jackrabbit
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Burrowing Owl N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Desert Cottontail R5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Desert Cottontail R5
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Low
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Medium
Gila Monster N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Gila Monster N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Gray Fox
Threat Impact
No Threat NA
Kit Fox N4
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Kit Fox N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mojave Desert Tortoise N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Mule Deer R1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Smith's Black-headed Snake N5
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Medium
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Sand and Gravel Low
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Sediment Transport Imbalance High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Stormwater Runoff Medium
Gambel's quail R3
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Medium
Gambel's quail R3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Habitats
Habitat
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Desert Grassland
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Mojave Desert Shrub
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Mojave Desert Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Very High
Project Comments
Comment 01/25/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
I wholeheartedly support the elimination of cheatgrass and other invasives. However, I'm wary about the use of chemicals, and particularly aerial application. Can you please provide some information on the impacts of rejuvra on native plants, soils, ground and surface water, and wildlife? Are there studies of the effectiveness of rejuvra and potential impacts that you could reference/include? Have you used this elsewhere? If so, do you have monitoring to support its efficacy? Does it have impacts on humans? If so, will you be closing this area to recreation for a certain period of time?
Comment 01/26/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Jacob Benson
100% in support on control of cheat grass. Judi, If not use of chemical the next option is strategic grazing. What other option would be the best practice for control of cheat grass? Great project Curtis, it seems this area burns and will increase frequency if cheat grass is not controlled.
Comment 01/26/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Jacob, I'm not opposing this project, and am highly in favor of finding the most effective ways to remove and control cheatgrass. I'm just asking for some additional information on the effectiveness and potential impacts of the product to be used. Are there best practices for applying rejuvra to protect non-target native plants, wildlife and water sources? These are not unreasonable questions or concerns. Also, one option that should be a best practice for control and prevention of cheatgrass is the removal of livestock from areas of cheatgrass infestation.
Comment 02/01/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Hi Judy - I am going to field this one for Curtis at least in part as we are tag teaming this project and he took it on at my request. I'll provide info here in the comments and then we will work toward getting it into the project details page as applicable as well. In general rejuvra is considered a pre-emergent herbicide that specifically targets annual species. Meaning its impact on native plants is a benefit as it releases them from the competition of annuals (in this case red brome and cheatgrass). The trick however is that as a pre-emergent it does for a time (3-5 years in a majority of the climates we work in, but more likely closer to the 3 end in the mojave area) impact seed establishment of many species. This means we need to be sure to select target areas based on existing perennial vegetation and ensuring it is there to be released, and in this case there is a strong component of perennial vegetation that should do very well in the absence of the competition from cheatgrass and red brome. I'll work on finding some of the studies that have been done, I have listened to multiple oral presentations at professional society meetings just need to find the paper references to get them in there for you. I will say we follow all the label recommendations. We have used this on an adjacent state section on T-Bone Mesa last year as well as several of our Wildlife Management Areas in Beaver and Fountain Green as we are just stepping up from small test plots to using it on a larger landscape to see if the test plot type results pan out. Additionally, the product has been used on thousands of acres in Colorado and Wyoming and they have been thrilled with the results and the ability to outlast a seed bank. We will follow the same precautions we did last year with the T-Bone application as well as some additional. We posted signs at the applicable trail heads several days ahead of the treatment notifying people it would be going on on that date and then had staff on site the day of the treatment and were prepared to direct users as to what was going on and advise them to avoid the area that day, but did not encounter any. For this treatment as it is adjacent in part to neighborhoods we are exploring the use of a ground application (likely back pack sprayers) for a buffer before we start the aerial application.
Comment 02/07/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Judi Brawer
Gary, thank you so much for this detailed explanation, I really appreciate it. I look forward to seeing how it works and follow-up monitoring. I do have one other questions: What cultural surveys and tribal consultation are being/have been conducted for this project?
Comment 02/10/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Here is the canned response: The WRI takes pride in being in compliance with state and federal cultural resource laws. The need for cultural surveys is defined by the treatment type and by the applicability of Programmatic Agreements or Protocols between the relevant state or federal agency and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). For treatments identified as an undertaking under Utah Code 9-8-404 or the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and involve ground disturbing activities (e.g. bullhog; chaining), the WRI funds and completes intensive cultural resource inventories and consults with SHPO on findings prior to implementation. Treatments that have been identified by SHPO and a state or federal agency as not having the potential to affect cultural resources (e.g. aerial seeding) generally do not receive a cultural resource survey. Tribal consultation takes place as part of the NHPA compliance process and is completed by the relevant federal agency before implementation occurs. Unless consultation with SHPO and relevant tribes agree to otherwise, projects that involve ground breaking treatments do not begin until the SHPO and tribal consultation processes are complete. And the more project specific reality is this is not a ground disturbing activity and as such does not trigger these needs.
Comment 02/11/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Curtis Roundy
Judi, I will defer to what Gary has already responded to as for your questions. Thanks for taking the time to review and comment on this project.
Comment 01/26/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Curtis, Nice project idea to start tackling one of our biggest issues. I am curious as to how the pilot project 5751 submitted to UWRI last FY went? Gary said he would take me out to check it out, but he sits on a throne of lies like Stan Gurley. I have a couple big comments 1) You list a slew of benefitting species that you don't discuss benefits, provide plan objectives, or discuss monitoring for. I know some rankers get rankled at that. I might also suggest that runoff from past fires in the Virgin River drainage have contributed to low dissolved oxygen conditions in the Virgin River itself, negatively affecting woundfin (N1), Virgin River chub (N1), flannelmouth sucker (N3), Desert sucker (N4). Revegetating the fire scar and finding ways to break the cheat grass fire cycle could benefit these species, but I guess no one cares for the fish anymore. 2) Sustainable Uses -- the whole reason for the tortoise reserve was so that Washngton County could develop other areas and have tortoise take so this area is extremely important economically for that County. Similarly, conservation actions for T&E species and CAS species are what moves them toward downlisting or not being listed at all, which allows for all other uses to occur without additional federal regulation. FYI, we are trying to get authorization of ground based application of Rejuvra for the Forest for many areas via the Pine Valley Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project that is currently under analysis. Hopefully at some point will move toward compliance for aerial application. Kind of like using rotenone to remove nonnative trout, I am not sure there is any other effective way of dealing with cheat grass,
Comment 01/27/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Stan Gurley
Mike Golden, you wash that filthy mouth out! Your false accusations are horrific!
Comment 02/01/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
Talk to my Mom and see if she can find that horrible soap she used to use for that.
Comment 02/01/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Gary Bezzant
Hey Mike lets go for a ride so I can show you the cheatgrass that did not germinate. Thanks for the tips on fish species we will work to capture those thoughts, we do care, we just need an expert to tell us what it is so we can put that care to work. Thanks also for the tips on sustainable uses, I actually am thinking about hiring you on a contract basis to write all my proposals, they would certainly be better!
Comment 02/01/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Michael Golden
I am looking for a job where I am appreciated Gary...
Comment 02/11/2022 Type: 1 Commenter: Curtis Roundy
Mike, Thanks for taking some time to review my project and make comments. I have added the fish species to the benefitting species list on your recommendation and added some language to the proposal that should help others see how this project will benefit those species. Hold Gary to taking you out on the treatment from last year. It is showing great success in cheatgrass control is possible, and we hope that this project will only build on what I also feel is the only effective way to deal with cheatgrass.
Completion
Start Date:
End Date:
FY Implemented:
Final Methods:
Project Narrative:
Future Management:
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
11454 Terrestrial Treatment Area Herbicide application Aerial (helicopter)
Project Map
Project Map