Project Need
Need For Project:
Emergent vegetation (primarily cattails) are encroaching on two Least chub refuge ponds located at the Tooele Army Depot South to the point that open water habitat has become much more confined, with the potential left untreated to impact the species. Nonnative Phragmites (common reed) is also becoming more extensive in the lower pond. Proliferation of willows around the perimeters, primarily the upper pond, has rendered access for biological sampling difficult and threatens to overwhelm portions of a fence encircling the upper pond.
Objectives:
1. Improve access by trimming willows and other vegetation surrounding the ponds.
2. Increase open water habitat for chubs in the ponds by selective removal of cattails and other emergent aquatic vegetation, and also some submerged vegetation and sediment on a limited basis, retaining an ample amount for breeding and cover (up to 25% of open water surface area).
3. Improve water conveyance efficiency between the two ponds via selective removal of terrestrial vegetation along the channel connecting them.
4. Process vegetation waste and transport composted material to various sites on the property for other beneficial uses.
5. Estimate and photo document decrease in target vegetation (area removed vs. area remaining) and increase in open area of ponds.
6. Continue to document densities of adult and juvenile least chub annually.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
As the ponds continue to become more encroached by vegetation it will become less suitable for occupancy by least chub and increasingly difficult to collect and salvage fish prior to cleaning the ponds, which could result in higher rates of mortality of a sensitive species.
Relation To Management Plan:
Utah Wildlife Action Plan. 2015. Least chub are listed as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need (S2/N1) under the WAP. Threats to its persistence include invasive nonnative species, both plants and animals. Nonnative common reed (Phragmites) has invaded the refuge pools and is spreading. Least chub are particularly sensitive because they exist largely as isolated populations with shrinking habitat due to droughts, water management, and encroachment of vegetation on their habitat.
Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Least Chub. 1998. Goal is to ensure long-term persistence of Least Chub within its historic range and support development of statewide conservation efforts. Objectives include to: 1) eliminate or significantly reduce threats to least chub and its habitat to the greatest extent possible, and 2) restore and maintain a minimum number of populations throughout its historic range that will ensure the continued existence of Least Chub. The CAS's goal and both objectives are applicable to the proposed project.
Fire / Fuels:
N/A
Water Quality/Quantity:
Selective removal of submerged and emergent vegetation in the pond should help improve water quality by reducing the amount of decaying organic material in the pond, which increases biological oxygen demand and could therefore reduce dissolved oxygen levels during certain periods. Impacts to oxygen levels may be seasonal, such as during winter when the pond may freeze and oxygen exchange and circulation is more limited; and daily, such as during the night when plant respiration far exceeds photosynthesis.
Proposed actions are not intended or expected to improve water quantity because only plants and saturated organic material (peat), and not sediment, are slated for removal. The DWR does not have any water rights at the WMA but there are no held downstream of the ponds. Water Rights has informed DWR there should not be significant issues if dredging is held to a minimum level. Sediment removal will largely be an artifact of removal of emergent vegetation to the rhizome (root).
Compliance:
N/A.
DWR will take the necessary precautions to protect fish from harm due to proposed clearance activities to the maximum practicable extent and has jurisdiction over this State-listed species. There are no water rights issues at this site to affect work, however, we will exercise restraint with any sediment removal.
Methods:
HEAVY EQUIPMENT: Tooele Army Depot personnel will utilize heavy equipment including a mini excavator and possibly a backhoe to help remove Phragmites from the lower pond, cattails from either pond, and as necessary, to perform some minor dredging usually coincident with removal of emergent vegetation. Heavy equipment may also be used to help clear some willows from around the ponds to facilitate access for monitoring, primarily the upper pond. All use of heavy equipment will be done under the guidance of DWR biologists.
HAND CREWS: Personnel will utilize cutting shears and shovels (supplied by DWR) to remove upland and emergent vegetation in both ponds, but primarily the upper pond where vegetation encroachment is more severe. DWR biologists will oversee this work. Goal is to open up densely vegetated (emergent and submerged) but retain an sufficient amount (25% minimum pond coverage) as cover and breeding habitat for fish.
SHREDDER: Removed vegetation will be stockpiled and fed into a shredder. Processed vegetation will be hauled away from the site for use elsewhere on Army Depot grounds.
FISH SALVAGE: Remove as many fish as possible from ponds prior to activities and transfer to holding tank. Return fish to ponds when completed.
Monitoring:
Habitat measurements will be taken before and after treatments. These will include emergent vegetation areal coverage, upland vegetation coverage, and pond depth transects (x, y). These will be repeated during annual surveys coincident with scheduled fish surveys. Results of this management effort will be summarized in a separate report.
Partners:
Tooele Army Depot will be supplying heavy equipment (excavators and shredders) and personnel to help remove and process plant material.
Future Management:
This project is expected to be completed during one year, but because vegetation can be regenerated it will likely need to be repeated at some level of intensity in the future. That time frame should be extended through the proposed actions of removing selected emergent vegetation (native cattail and nonnative Phragmites) down to and including the rhizomes, by which they spread.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Least chub are listed as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need and recently were petitioned for the second time to be listed under the Endangered Species Act. Taking steps to prevent least chub from being listed under the ESA will be important to reduce economic impacts to Utahns. Federal listing could affect acquisition of water rights, groundwater pumping rates, cattle ranching practices, and housing development.