Blue Fly Rabbitbrush control wildlife enhancement project
Project ID: 6387
Status: Cancelled
Fiscal Year: 2021
Submitted By: 1110
Project Manager: Daniel Eddington
PM Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
PM Office: Southeastern Region
Lead: U.S. Forest Service
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
This project proposes to control rabbitbrush on 85 acres in the Blue Fly area on the Paunsaugunt management unit. Rabbitbrush will be treated with a rotary mower and treated with a wet-mop type treatment that will apply herbicide immediately following cutting. Removal of the Rabbitbrush will allow for expansion of Threatened Utah Prairie dogs in adjacent occupied colonies as well as increase grass and forb production for other wildlife and livestock.
Location:
The project is located in the Blue Fly drainaige on the Powell Ranger District, Dixie National Forest. The area is part of the Paunsaugunt management unit. The area is generally located approximately 5 miles South West of Ruby's Inn and the entrance to Bryce Canyon National Park.
Project Need
Need For Project:
The Blue Fly meadows area consist of open grass and wet meadow bottomlands surrounded by ponderosa pine parklands on pink Claron formation soils. The Forest Service has invested in ecological restoration efforts in this area during the last several years through underburning ponderosa pine and PJ from meadows and in cleaning and sealing ponds. The rabbitbrush removal is considered to be a key component as it will improve grazing capacity for wildlife and livestock and more importantly allow for Utah Prairie Dog (UPD) expansion beyond the existing footprint where colonies are currently found. Blue Fly Creek provides marginal habitat for nonnative trout, primarily because of low flows and limited habitat. Replacing upland vegetation with hydric species could improve habitat for nonnative trout and native speckled dace in Blue Fly Creek. Because the project area provides critical habitat for Threatened Utah Prairie Dog there is a great need to remove the rabbitbrush and provide for habitat expansion of this species. Because Plague is huge threat to this species, providing for this habitat improvement which is more distant from larger colonies provides for biological security across the range. Continued invasion and establishment of rabbitbrush is a threat as this shrub-type is increasing in the area. As more brush becomes established it will push out grasses and forbs as well as reduce the habitat effectiveness for wildlife in the area. Waiting longer to treat this site increases the likelihood greatly that UPD will abandon the area instead of increasing their range in this meadow complex. Timely treatment is necessary. Because the area has limited connectivity to other large colonies it is more critical that this project happens now. Some invasive non-native musk thistle is also found at the proposed treatment site. UPD will not tolerate the taller vegetation (brush) and will be pushed from the area as well. As with any type of disturbance, there is some risk that undesirable species (weeds) will establish post-treatment. Powell Ranger District has had good success with treating this vegetation type in the past by treating late in the fall/winter and wet-mopping with herbicide. Proper timing and treatment of rabbitbrush will minimize the risk to wildlife as well. During late fall and early winter, UPD will be underground and will not be disturbed by mechanized equipment. The proposed project addresses the following threats and risks identified in the Utah Wildlife Action Plan: Invasive Plant species-Non Native: The project will seek to eliminate Musk Thistle and reduce rabbitbrush that reduce wildlife habitat effectiveness as well as ungulate forage capacity. The project will allow for more effective control of both species. Problematic Plant Species - Native Upland. Rabbitbrush is a native plant that is know to colonize an area and create dense shrub cover that overcrowds the grass/forb understory. Over time this species can dominate a site. This treatment will reverse that where applied. In addition to the threats above, there have been several spring and summer sightings of Greater sage grouse hens that are now utilizing the Blue Fly area as brood rearing habitat. The proposed project will enhance this brood rearing habitat by removing the encroaching brush and facilitating grasses and forbs within the meadow areas.
Objectives:
UPD were noted in small numbers in the Blue Fly area in 2002 & 2003. Over time and with plague abatement efforts the colony has grown in spring counted numbers as well as expanded throughout the Blue Fly meadows area. The objectives of the project are to: 1)Reduce rabbit brush across 85 acres. 2) Improve habitat characteristics for Utah Prairie Dog and other wildlife including mule deer, elk, and pronghorn that utilize the meadow complex. 3) Allow for expansion of UPD into areas cleared of Rabbitbrush, and 4) Improve forage capacity for livestock and wildlife by increasing grasses and removing brush.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Relation To Management Plan:
The project has been coordinated with the Utah Praire dog recovery team as well as the COCARM Greater Sage grouse working group. During the most recent meeting of COCARM 08 Jan 2020, the project was ranked as a high project that would contribute to improving habitat for Sage Grouse as well as other species. The project is relevant to the following plans including: Conservation Plan for Greater Sage-Grouse in Utah - Feb 14, 2013. pp. 4 Objective 2.0.3 Habitat: Enhance an average of 25,000 acres of sage-grouse habitat in Sage-grouse Management Areas annually. Color Country Greater Sage-Grouse local conservation plan. Feb 9, 2008. Section V. Conservation Strategy. pp 53 - Strategy: Reduce impacts of concentrated wildlife or livestock use of sage-grouse winter and brood-rearing habitat. Utah Statewide Mule-deer Management Plan: Improve habitat and forage. Deer Herd Unit # 27 (Paunsaugunt) May 2015 :Cooperate with federal land management agencies and private landowners in carrying out habitat improvement projects. Protect deer winter ranges from wildfire by reseeding burned areas, creating fuel breaks and reseed areas dominated by cheatgrass with desirable perennial vegetation. Utah Statewide Elk management Plan: Improve habitat and forage in Utah. Paunsaugunt Elk herd management plan #27: Continue to be committed to the statewide goal of supporting habitat projects that increase forage for both big game and livestock. Utah's Wildlife Action Plan - Improve habitat for Greater Sage Grouse - a SGCN Utah Prairie Dog Conservation Agreement and Strategy on Federal Lands in the Paunsaugunt Recovery Unit. October 2018: pp. 11 3) Manage and improve Utah prairie dog habitat on Federal lands. pp. 19 Vegetation treatments will be planned and implemented as needed in strategic locations (including translocation sites) to benefit Utah prairie dogs and their habitats. Utah Statewide Pronghorn Management plan: B. Habitat Management Goal: Conserve and improve pronghorn habitat throughout the state. Utah Wildlife Action Plan: Utah Prairie dog (High Threat), Species of Greates Conservation Need pp16. Dixie National Forest Land and Resource Management plan: plan - pp. IV-84, Standard: A. Maintain habitat capability at a level at least 80 % of potential capability for all emphasized species. And. pp. IV-112, 6A management direction, (1) Maintain and manage forested inclusions to provide a high level of forage production, wildlife habitat, and diversity. Garfield County current desired future conditions and Draft resource management plan. pp. 5 Wildlife Goal: Prior to December 31, 2025, land managers will seek to have habitats supporting important fish and wildlife species meet the following seral stage ranges: Early Stage 30% to 50% Mid Stage 30% to 40% Late Stage Less than 25%And Policy...Based on a 10 year rolling average and consistent with desired ecological site descriptions, restore at least 25% of the Class II and Class III pinyon / juniper woodlands having a median age of less than 200 years to sagebrush / semi-desert grassland vegetation communities. Garfield County Resource plan. pp. 130 g) The most efficient techniques possible are used to control cheatgrass, invasive conifers, rabbitbrush and noxious weeds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Prairie Dog Recovery Plan. pp.79, (2.3.1) Plan and implement vegetation treatments in strategic locations (including translocation sites) that benefit Utah Prairie Dogs and their habitat. UTAH'S FINAL 2016 INTEGRATED REPORT - The area draining this project is in Assessment Unit East Fork Sevier-2 which the reports lists as a Category 5 water "Category 5: The concentration of a pollutant--or several pollutants--exceeds numeric water quality criteria, or quantitative biological assessments indicate that the biological designated uses are not supported (narrative water quality standards are violated)." Reducing sediment generation in this watershed may contribute to improving the O/E Assessment score for macroinvertebrates causing this exceedance.
Fire / Fuels:
Water Quality/Quantity:
Compliance:
The proposed project is consistent with the Dixie Land and Resource Management Plan, and the Garfield County Resource plan. Rabbit Brush is a Garfield County listed noxious weed (Garfield commission meeting minutes). Treatment of noxious weeds is covered under the Dixie National Forest Noxious Weed EA Decision. No cultural resource surveys are required.
Methods:
Within the proposed 85 acre treatment areas, the brush will be mowed and Tordon herbicide will be immediately applied to cut stems during a late fall or early winter application. Herbicide should be applied with a wiper attachment that trails behind the cutting head. It is anticipated that the treatment will occur in the late fall of 2020. Follow-up monitoring and spot re-treatment would be conducted by District personnel treating noxious weeds at 1 year post treatment. Follow-up treatments will focus on treating residual rabbit brush and any other noxious weeds that try to establish.
Monitoring:
The mapped and treated areas will be inspected annually for several years post-treatment to ensure no other noxious weed become established. Re-growth from rabbitbrush can be easily re-treated by mechanically hand-chopping and treating with Tordon. The Forest Service has both an upland range trend site and a Winward greenline riparian inventory within the foot print of the project area. These sites are monitored on a 5-year interval. Several photo points will be established and read at 5 year intervals to help determine re-establishment and to gain a better understanding on return intervals within the proposed soil type. The Forest monitors fish bearing streams on an approximately 5 year interval. Blue Fly Creek was last monitored in 2016. results of Forest monitoring are published in a biennial monitoring report that can be uploaded to the UWRI web site. Monitoring of Big game species is conducted by UDWR on an annual basis. Deer, Elk and pronghorn classification are conducted by local area biologist. Monitoring for UPD is conducted by USFS biologist as a spring adult count prior to pups emergence. The Blue Fly UPD colony has been slowly but steadily expanding for approximately 10 years. Now colony expansion has hit the brush areas (thus the need for the proposed project).
Partners:
The proposed project is part of a larger management strategy to enhance wildlife habitat effectiveness and increase grazing capacity for many wildlife species that inhabit the area. It specifically addresses habitat issues for Utah Prairie Dog and Mule deer on the Paunsaugunt plateau. Partners working specifically on UPD recovery efforts include USFWS, NPS, BLM, USFS, UDWR, Garfield county, and surrounding cities. Partners working specifically on Mule deer habitat with the Paunsaugunt management unit include: Sportsman for Fish and Wildlife, UDWR, Mule deer Foundation, Friends of the Paunsaugunt, Rocky Mountain elk foundation, and USFS.
Future Management:
Future management will be guided by monitoring. If treated successfully little to no further re-treatment would be needed for many years. Spot treatments could occur for 2-3 years post treatment. USFS is hopeful that the treatment will allow for further expansion of UPD within the meadow complex area. As further habitat gains are made management recommendations to UDWR on mule deer, elk, and pronghorn would be expected. Livestock forage capacity and overall watershed health is an anticipated outcome from the project as well. Current grazing management provides for summer pasture on the Blue Fly cattle allotment. The proposed project will further increase forage capacity for livestock as well as other ungulates/big-game species. The meadow areas provide critical parturition habitat for Mule deer, elk, and pronghorn as well as key habitat for Utah prairie dog. Based on radio telemetry data some sage grouse (hens) are utilizing the meadows to raise broods during late spring and summer months. During the spring/summer of 2020 RX burns are planned for the surrounding uplands in Ponderosa pine to help revitalize the pine understory and remove encroaching PJ. This will further enhance wildlife habitat effectiveness in the surrounding area however it makes it even more critical that we restore the meadows and function with the proposed project. As more stable perennial flows are restored to the Blue Fly creek area, future management would need to include some riparian pasture fencing to alleviate livestock pressure on meadows and riparian areas. The proposed project would be expected to enhance wildlife habitat effectiveness on over 85 acres of USFS administered land. The area is also managed for livestock grazing and is part of the Blue Fly C & H allotment. This allotment is managed for 193 head under a 2 pasture deferred grazing system from June 11 through October 10 annually. It is expected that the 85 acre treated area will see improved grazing capacity for livestock as well as other ungulates as brush is removed and grasses and forbs re-establish. The area proposed for treatment as well as the surrounding Ponderosa pine stands provide critical parturition habitat for mule deer, elk, and pronghorn. Removing the rabbitbrush and restoring meadow function will enhance and restore wet meadow function and improve habitat for all these hunted species. Increasing water flow throughout this drainage is important to big game as well as other wildlife as drinking water as well as improving forage capacity and composition. Improving this habitat is key as it provides an undisturbed nursery area on public lands that is not encroached by housing, highways, agriculture and other threats.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$24,250.00 $0.00 $24,250.00 $5,000.00 $29,250.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Other Mower/herbicide contract on 85 acres. $21,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Other Contract preparation, clearances, coordination, and contract inspection. Coordination for UPD and monitoring as well as spot treatment. $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2021
Other State Contract Herbicide (Helena) Tordon 22k 17 - (2.5) Gallon - MSO Premium 9 (2.5) Gallon $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$24,250.00 $0.00 $24,250.00 $5,000.00 $29,250.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
Species Protection Account $24,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021
Federal U.S. Forest Service $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 2021
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Brook Trout 4
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Low
Brook Trout 4
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Low
Brown Trout 2
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) High
Brown Trout 2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Brown Trout 2
Threat Impact
Soil Erosion / Loss Low
Burrowing Owl N4
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Elk 2
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (historic) Medium
Elk 2
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Very High
Greater Sage-grouse N3 1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Mule Deer 1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity High
Mule Deer 1
Threat Impact
Problematic Plant Species – Native Upland High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Disease – Alien Organisms Very High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Habitat Shifting and Alteration High
Utah Prairie Dog N1
Threat Impact
Inappropriate Fire Frequency and Intensity Low
Habitats
Habitat
Project Comments
Comment 03/25/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Brianne Emery
Can you describe the current understory in this project area? What kind of data does the upland range trend study in the project area yield?
Comment 04/07/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Kim Long
We have 10 upland studies (4 nested frequencies and 6 ocular macroplots), 1 greenline, and 1 UDWR Big Game Range Trend Study in the Blue Fly C&H allotment. See attached summaries.
Comment 04/08/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Travis Nauman
I too am "anchored" in the WRI DB functionality and continue to be surprised and not thrilled by little differences between the systems such as Daniel has experienced. Anyway besides that anchoring, another thing from WRI that works (in my opinion) is to provide a little context for the questions or concerns. It helps with providing an answer, and it can also teach people useful stuff that they might not know. So for example, my intuition is that Mindy's rabbitbrush questions stem from the fact that rabbitbrush blooms in the fall and is an important late-season food source for various pollinators. I could be entirely wrong though...
Comment 03/27/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Brianne Emery
Can you please provide a map of the upland range trend site overlaid with the project area and please provide those data?
Comment 03/27/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Kim Long
Mindy - I have sent a request to the project manager, Jake Schoppe, for both of those request. Waiting to hear back from him.
Comment 03/27/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Brianne Emery
Does this eliminate all rabbitbrush in the area or will some remain?
Comment 03/27/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Brianne Emery
Do you have a target for the increase in forage in the area and do you think seeding will be needed to get you to that target?
Comment 03/27/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Brianne Emery
Would you consider a larger buffer area between the Tordon application and what looks to be a perennial stream (E side of project area)? What is the soil type in the project area?
Comment 04/08/2020 Type: 1 Commenter: Kim Long
Response from Jake Schoppe. "Sorry folks, I was sending responses directly to Mindy for this. For some reason I'm not getting the updates from the ESMF that there were comments in here as well. To answer your questions: We have not run transects directly through these rabbitbrush stands to determine the understory. It is not the intent of the project to improve forage capacity for ungulates however that will be an unintended consequence. The primary goal is to reduce or eliminate brush that is impeding the movement and expansion of UPD. These are relatively small/remote colonies that are important because they are (isolated) from the large conlonies that plague out so frequently. They provide a back-up so to speak. I sent Mindy all of the surrounding range trend data that we have. In general conditions are good on this allotment. I am still waiting on a map from our GIS folks for the locations of the study sites in relation to the proposed project. Sorry, I dont do GIS... As per the question about eliminating all rabbitbrush. The project will not eliminate all rabbitbrush in the area. It targets the dense rabbitbrush patches that are found directly adjacent to occupied UPD. These are the patches that limit expansion and by treating them sight lines would be opened up and immediate expansion into the treated areas could occur. In regards to the buffer area. There are no perrenial or live streams found within close proximity to the proposed treatments. The Blue Fly area has surface run-off following snowmelt, But there is limited live water nearby. We would entertain any buffer that someone wishes but would ask that they come out on the ground and look at/review what is proposed. The project is designed to primarily benefit UPD and secondarily greater sage grouse. Again there is no target to increase forage and seeding would not be necessary. This is based upon similar treatments we have conducted on other areas where the understory promptly recovered without the brush competing with it. Soils are deep and well drained. There is no current soils survey for the area however because soils dont tend to move around much what is found in the Soil Survey of the Panguitch Area should be sufficient. P. 10, Soil is classified as Zinzer-Luhon-Tridell. (Very deep, well drained, gently sloping to moderately steep soils; on alluvial fans, fan terraces, and mountainsides). In this case they are primarily in the flat valley bottom of the Blue Fly drainaige and are well aerated by Utah Prairie dogs. The Paunsaugunt plateau has a history of abuse and recovery. Due to claron formation soils that are highly erodable many of the side slopes and alluvial fans have been terraced to alleviate soil erosion. This is evidenced as you drive south and up in elevation across the plateau. Logging and grazing have contributed to this erosion over time. As the Powell district seeks to restore habitats we are releasing beavers to improve the water flow and watersheds, implementing RX fire and managing non-human fire, as well as practicing sustainable siliviculture practices. UPD are found at the lower elevations of the plateau in sage-steppe and open meadow areas that are receiving encroachment from conifers such as Ponderosa pine, and PJ. In addition, brush frequently limits UPD expansion in these meadows. It is our goal to limit conifer and brush encroachment as to sustain and enhance UPD habitat."
Comment 09/01/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Kim Long
I uploaded some pictures.
Comment 09/01/2021 Type: 1 Commenter: Dana Dean
I added the final ESMF expenses for this project and moved it to Complete. Please upload the After photographs if you have them. Thanks.
Comment 07/06/2021 Type: 2 Commenter: Dana Dean
With fiscal year 2021 now behind us, please report on your FY21 ESMF project accomplishments in the ESMF database by September 1, 2021. This includes 1) filling in all fields on the completion form as well as 2) reporting on the expenses for the project at the bottom of the Finance Tab. Your project will not be closed until this reporting is completed. While reporting, please indicate if the project finished on track and what was accomplished by project task. If the project could not be completed, please also report on what was not accomplished and why some tasks were not completed. If you have been approved for carry over funding, please indicate what project tasks will be completed during fiscal year 2022.
Completion
Start Date:
11/20/2020
End Date:
12/21/2020
FY Implemented:
2021
Final Methods:
This project was designed to control rabbitbrush on 85 acres in the Blue Fly area on the Paunsaugunt management unit. Rabbitbrush was treated with a rotary mower and a wet-mop type treatment that applies the herbicide (Tordon) immediately following cutting. Removal of the Rabbitbrush will allow for expansion of Threatened Utah Prairie dogs in adjacent occupied colonies as well as increase grass and forb production for other wildlife and livestock. A contract was awarded for rabbitbrush removal to Soil Works from Vernal Utah. Soil Works brought their tractor and mower and started on November 3, 2020 and completed the project on November 14, 2020 completing a total of 85 acres.
Project Narrative:
This project has enhanced the habitat for multiple species on 85 acres of USFS administered land. The removal of the rabbitbrush will open up the meadow complex not only for the Utah Prairie Dog, but mule deer, elk, and pronghorn that utilize the meadow complex.
Future Management:
The Blue fly area has several small (occupied) Utah Prairie dog (UPD) colonies. Rabbit brush was targeted and removed to help facilitate wildlife habitat effectiveness. Tordon was used as a spray with a marker so that tractor operator could see where they had been. The kill rate on the rabbitbrush wont be able to be determined until spring / summer 2021 after the monitoring is completed.
Map Features
N/A
Project Map
N/A