Project Need
Need For Project:
A previously unknown least chub population was discovered in a seepage channel and portions of the San Pitch River below Gunnison Dam in 2016. Hydrology is compromised here and habitat is limited. This nearly caused a large loss of fish in 2018 which had to be salvaged from an isolated pool in the river channel and moved to the ditch. The Least Chub Conservation Team recommended to begin transferring fish to refuges. A limited transfer of approximately 50 fish took place in 2020 to Mud Basin. DWR policy under the Conservation Agreement and Strategy is to secure at least two refuges for each wild population. Therefore, we recommend a second transfer in 2021 to Manti Meadows WMA where spring flow has been improved recently and new pond habitats have been created through a WRI-funded project. If this site is deemed unsuitable as a refuge due to the presence of nonnative fish or inadequate habitat conditions, we recommend augmenting the Mud Basin refuge with a second transfer and evaluating the efficacy of eliminating nonnative fish from Manti Meadows. Although the Mud Basin population was reproducing well in its first year, it was founded with only about 50 individuals. Its genetic diversity would be improved through augmentation from the wild Gunnison population.
Objectives:
1. Collect surrogate fish from San Pitch River below project site for disease certification. Complete fish transfer and HACCP plans and submit to SLO for approval.
2. Survey Manti Meadows WMA to confirm presumed absence of nonnative fish. Perform any other necessary habitat (physical, vegetation) and water quality measurements.
3. Collect least chub from project site and transfer to Manti Meadows WMA.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Relation To Management Plan:
Utah Wildlife Action Plan. 2015.
Least Chub are listed as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need under the WAP. Threats to its persistence include: 1) invasive nonnative species (very high), 2) drought (very high), and 3) dam and water management (high). All of these are factors threatening the wild population at the proposed project.
Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Least Chub. 1998.
Goal to ensure conservation of Least Chub within its historic range, with main objectives to 1) restore and maintain a minimum number of populations throughout its historic range that will ensure its continued existence and 2) to eliminate or significantly reduce threats to the species and its habitat to the greatest extent possible. Both objectives are applicable to the proposed project.
San Pitch River Watershed Water Quality Management Plan. 2003.
The San Pitch River is listed as 3C, protected for nongame fish and other aquatic wildlife. Nongame species of concern in the area include Least Chub and Southern Leatherside Chub. Control of nonnative vegetation (a proposed WRI project to facilitate the proposed transfer) to benefit wildlife and improve the water budget is one of the objectives of the water quality management plan.
Division of Wildlife Resources Strategic Management Plan.
Resource Goal: Expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat. A proposed WRI project to facilitate the proposed transfer of fish by reducing nonnative vegetation around an area utilized by least chub and thereby improving their habitat is directly applicable to the Strategic Plan.
Fire / Fuels:
Water Quality/Quantity:
Compliance:
NEPA not required because property is private and not a federal action.
No other compliance issues should apply.
Methods:
Collect 65-70 dace from San Pitch River downstream of dam near Twelvemile Creek and deliver to Logan Hatchery for disease certification. Assist AIS crew as necessary with site inspection. Complete fish transfer and HACCP plan and submit to SLO for approval. Confirm lack of nonnative fishes (particularly mosquitofish) at Manti Meadows WMA. Collect least chub from site (seepage ditch and any river habitats) using minnow traps and electrofishing as necessary. Place fish in aeration tank and transfer to refuge (Manti Meadows or Mud Basin). Transfer may need to be accomplished in two efforts if first effort is time consuming or less productive than desired (e.g. <100 fish).
Monitoring:
The least chub population below Gunnison Dam will continue to be monitored under ESMF block funding after the second transfer is completed. In addition, a project has been proposed for funding under Section 319 to remove dense growth of Russian Olive and tamarisk which is crowding the channel and likely reducing available habitat via water consumption. The status of this removal effort would be monitored annually for at least the first few years if the project is approved. Mud Basin pond is in the Northern region and will continue to be monitored by the NRO. Manti Meadows will be added to the refuge populations monitored annually by the CRO if it is suitable for use as a refuge.
Partners:
San Pitch River Watershed Stewardship Group - contacted Jace Farnsworth (Coordinator) and Jay Olsen. The group is very supportive of the proposed project and has collaborated with the NRCS on nonnative vegetation control projects in the basin. We will be participating in the next meeting of the group in February to answer any questions about the proposal.
USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service - collaborates with the watershed group and other entities to improve water availability and quality. Our proposed project is consistent with its goals in the San Pitch River watershed and it is supportive of project.
Sanpete Water Conservancy District - Our proposed project is consistent with its goals in the San Pitch River watershed and it is supportive of project.
Gunnison Irrigation Company - contacted Allen Dyreng (President of GIC) and property landowner who has no objections to project.
Future Management:
The least chub population below Gunnison Dam will continue to be monitored under ESMF block funding after the second transfer is completed. It is possible that future transfers may be necessary if conditions warrant (i.e., either the the wild population or refuge populations are needing). In addition, a Section 319 project has been proposed to remove dense growth of Russian Olive and tamarisk which is crowding the channel and likely reducing the amount of available habitat via water consumption. The status of this removal effort would be monitored annually for at least the first few years after the project is completed, if it is approved.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources: