The June sucker (Chasmistes liorus) was federally listed as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1986. The June Sucker Recovery Plan (USFWS 1999) identified threats posed by nonnative and sport fish, water development, and habitat alteration as factors that resulted in the need to list the species. These factors contributed to a lack of recruitment for June sucker and the entire population consisted of relatively few, old individuals. At the time of listing, it was believed that the wild population consisted of fewer than 1,000 individuals. Subsequent estimates on the Provo River spawning population confirmed that the population was at very low levels (311
Objectives:
The goals of the JSRIP are to:
1) recover the June sucker so that it no longer requires protection under the ESA; and,
2) allow continued operation of existing water facilities and future development of water resources for human use in the Utah Lake drainage.
To achieve these goals the JSRIP is taking an ecosystem level approach using adaptive management techniques wherein biological information is gathered, reviewed and incorporated in JSRIP planning on an annual basis. The effectiveness of individual projects are monitored through separate monitoring efforts to provide feedback for future projects and recovery actions.
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Relation To Management Plan:
June Sucker Recovery Plan (USFWS 1999) -- project allows implementation of recovery actions
CUP Utah Lake System EIS (CUWCD 2004) -- project provides legal compliance and fulfills environmental commitments necessary to allow completion and operation of CUP.
Utah Lake Master Plan (Utah Lake Commission and FFSL 2010) -- plan identifies need to recover the June sucker.
Fire / Fuels:
Water Quality/Quantity:
Compliance:
Because the JSRIP has federal partners and federal funds are contributed annually to the program, an Environmental Assessment was completed for federal participation in the program. Additional NEPA compliance may be necessary and will be conducted on an as-needed basis for specific projects implemented under the JSRIP. Past projects that have required NEPA compliance include the removal of carp from Utah Lake, habitat restoration on Hobble Creek, rehabilitation of Red Butte Reservoir, the augmentation of flows in Hobble Creek, and the Provo River Delta Restoration Project.
Methods:
JSRIP recovery elements group recovery actions identified in the June Sucker Recovery Plan by the threats that they are intended to address. Recovery elements include: 1) Nonnative and Sportfish Management, 2) Habitat Development and Maintenance, 3) Water Management and Protection, 4) Genetic Integrity and Augmentation, 5) Research, Monitoring and Data Management, and 6) Information and Education. The purpose of recovery elements is to ensure a diversified and balanced approach to recovery whereby funding and effort can be applied at the appropriate level for each recovery element. In FY21, general activities that will be conducted through the JSRIP include: continuing efforts to maintain a reduced carp population in Utah Lake; planning for and implementing habitat enhancement projects on the Provo River and Hobble Creek to benefit June sucker recovery (including the Provo River Delta Restoration Project); providing supplemental water to augment flows in the Provo River and Hobble Creek; maintaining captive populations and augmenting the wild population in Utah Lake; conducting monitoring and research to track the effectiveness of recovery efforts, and conducting proactive public outreach and media relations to support June sucker recovery actions.
Monitoring:
The recovery of June sucker is being addressed by research designed to clearly understand and develop approaches to managing threats and applied activities designed to address specific threats. Each activity conducted to benefit June sucker will be monitored and evaluated to gain information that can be applied to future efforts. The June sucker population is monitored annually during its spawning run in the Provo River and other tributaries. An increasing, self recruiting population in Utah Lake will be the long-term indication that threats are being successfully managed to allow for delisting.
Partners:
The JSRIP administers contributions from the JSRIP partners. The projects listed in this application have been approved by the JSRIP Administration Committee and will be administered by the Program Director's Office at DNR and the Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD). The JSRIP is a collaborative program among state, federal and local entities including DNR and its divisions, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission (URMCC), the Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD), the Provo River Water Users Association (PRWUA), the Provo Reservoir Water Users Company (represented by Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District), the Utah Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and an outdoor and environmental interests representative. On an annual basis each partner contributes funding and/or in-kind services commensurate with their respective role in the recovery effort.
Future Management:
An ecosystem-level approach towards recovery results in the implementation of actions that will benefit a broad array of species. The JSRIP Director's Office actively promotes coordination with the other management plans on Utah Lake and in the surrounding area. The Utah Lake Commission has worked with the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands to draft a master plan for the lake and its surrounding area. Objectives of that plan include the reduction of the lake's carp population and recovery of the June sucker.
The June Sucker Recovery Plan (USFWS 1999) is the guiding document for activities implemented under the JSRIP. Annual status reports are required for all projects approved for funding under the JSRIP. The Technical and Administration Committees meet on a regular basis to remain current on potential new threats and the status of JSIRP projects. These meetings are part of an adaptive management process that leads to timely adjustments to recovery strategies and ensures effective coordination of recovery activities.
The USFWS, under their ESA authority, determines if sufficient progress toward recovery is being made to allow for the JSRIP to serve as ESA compliance for federal water projects. The USFWS provided a memo to the JSRIP in May of 2015 indicating that sufficient progress towards recovery of the June sucker has been occurring.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources: