Beavers have been removed from many drainages and watersheds where they have historically occurred. They contribute important benefits to watersheds such as recharging and raising ground water tables, developing riparian vegetation, expanding wetlands, slowing flood waters, reducing erosion, improving water quality, providing habitat for aquatic species and other wildlife, and increasing biodiversity to the landscape. Landowners, USFS employees, BLM employees, and local communities have expressed interest and support in relocating nuisance beavers and restoring beaver populations in historic, suitable habitat (as explicated in the Statewide Management Plan). The UDWR has partnered with the USFS and other partners to put together a list of priority areas where beaver introduction would be beneficial and in line with concurrent or recently completed management actions such as cutthroat trout and sport fish management projects, boreal toad conservation actions, and wildlife habitat improvement projects. Re-establishing beavers into approved and suitable watersheds will restore these lost benefits and values, as well as provide an opportunity to diminish or eliminate nuisance issues resulting from beaver damage on private property, without resorting to lethal methods. Some issues associated with nuisance beavers include: impeding flow of irrigation water (blocking pipelines or culverts), flooding property, cutting cottonwoods/aspen/willow. In these circumstances, nuisance beavers would be an excellent source for live trapping and relocating to desirable and suitable locations. If a nuisance area's ecosystem is critically dependent on beaver activity, or provides a thriving environment for beavers, flow-control devices may be implemented to sustain beaver activity while resolving the associated nuisance issues. Summary of benefits to beaver dams: *Keystone species (or foundation species) - restoring degraded riparian communities which foments the recruitment of other wildlife including boreal toad and cutthroat trout *Helps to reverse the effects of erosion, road construction, etc. *Raises the water table, creating meadows and riparian vegetation *Decelerates snow melt and runoff, extending the season of water flow and curtailing erosion *Filtering out sediment, leaving cleaner watersheds downstream *Store and cool water underground *Releasing water during drought conditions helps to sustain healthy and productive aquatic and riparian communities *May provide overwintering habitat for fish in shallow, ice-covered streams. Many of the translocation sites have direct benefits to SGCN. For example the East Fork Sevier River upstream from Tropic Reservoir and Crawford Creek will have direct benefits to improving boreal toad breeding habitat for the Paunsaugunt Plateau population. This population has been in decline and the only breeding that has occurred for the past three years is in beaver ponds that were built by beavers translocated through this program. Maintaining and increasing beaver pond habitat provides additional breeding areas and additional places for toad metamorph releases from the Paunsaugunt head starting and captive breeding programs. The planned translocations to Deer Creek and Deep Creek would help with healing Sanford Fire impacts and benefit current BCT populations and future native minnow and sucker reintroductions (including southern leatherside). The planned translocation to Reservoir Canyon may be the only tool for restoring BCT habitat after the Grass Valley fire as it is in Wilderness. Hall Creek and Birch Creek (Main Canyon) both have low flows which limit the size and health of CRCT populations there. Beaver introductions could help with increasing the consistency of summer baseflows, allowing for more security for the remnant CRCT populations there. These are just a few specific examples of the SGCN benefits of this project.

Improve riparian habitat and biodiversity via re-establishing beavers in approved and suitable watersheds, consequently alleviating nuisance per Statewide Management Plan. Improve boreal toad breeding habitat, improve riparian vegetation, improve fisheries, and water quality. Also, we will continue forging cooperative partnerships with federal agencies and local governments to ensure beaver trapping and translocation efforts maximize benefits and minimize risks.

Beaver may transport Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS). To eliminate this issue, a 72-hour quarantine period will be required for any beavers from waterways that remain "unknown" in regards to AIS. Beavers from watersheds contaminated with AIS will be held in quarantine for 120 hours. Furthermore, beavers will not be relocated within a four mile radius of a fish hatchery, and those from sources of AIS will not be released in areas designated "critical habitat" for native cutthroat trout. Due to the delicate nature of live trapping, the UDWR has previously attended a workshop with Sherri Tippy to ensure the most meticulous and expedited process is implemented. Additionally, streams on the eastern side of Mount Dutton are slowly recovering from the Sanford Fire, so the reintroduction of beaver offers a low cost, low risk method of stabilizing those streams and reconnecting their floodplains. Without beaver it could take decades to centuries to regain floodplain connection and habitat complexity unless significantly more costly active stream restoration methods were employed. The presence of beaver in the upper reaches of Deep, Deer, and Cottonwood creek will have a net benefit for sage grouse in John's Valley. Beaver dams can increase water quantity and riparian quality; these benefits cascade upstream and downstream. Dams slow spring runoff and make more water available in the dry summer months. In turn, the availability of herbaceous riparian vegetation is increased in the system which provides important forage in itself and attracts insects; both key sage grouse diet components during the brood rearing season. The Monroe Mountain sites were chosen for the purpose of benefiting the adorable boreal toad. Boreal toad monitoring has depicted a dramatic decline in density, distribution and breeding activity over the past 20 years; at least some of which has been attributed to the loss of active and maintained beaver ponds. Furthermore, conservation agreements exist for both Colorado River Cutthroat Trout and Bonneville Cutthroat Trout, which directly benefit from the presence of beaver dams. The number one listed "problem facing the species" in the CRCT and BCT Conservation Agreement and Strategies is "The present or potential destruction, modification, or curtailment of habitat or range (HABITAT DEGREDATION)." The anthropogenic risks include the possibility of translocated beavers traveling far distances to create a new nuisance issue. One of the criterion of how the sites are selected is that they pose little or no opportunity for human conflict. The statewide plan states that we don't want to simply move a nuisance issue, so we want to avoid placing beavers where they will later become a nuisance on private property. I have only had reports of one translocation site resulting in a nuisance issue since 2012, and we are working to ameliorate that situation this spring (though trappers may already have the nuisance beavers killed by April). Should these issues arise from any translocation, we will use every facet provided in the statewide plan to assuage the problem. The positive anthropogenic impact is that we utilize nuisance beavers as our source for relocations, so we are addressing the current nuisance issues as well as attempting riparian restoration via translocations. We need to continue our translocation efforts at this time - not only to appease landowners throughout the region, but because of the critically low boreal toad population on the Monroe sites (due to chytrid fungus), and to exploit the large amount of riparian browse regeneration available on the Dutton, subsequent to the Sanford Fire.

Utah's Wildlife Action Plan: The goal/purpose of Utah's Wildlife Action Plan is "To manage native wildlife species and their habitats, sufficient to prevent the need for additional listings under the Endangered Species Act." Bonneville cutthroat trout have been petitioned for listing threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act multiple times and translocating beaver to streams on the east side of Mount Dutton would improve their habitat. The WAP has an objective to reduce the scope and severity of channel downcutting for aquatic forested and riverine habitat. It also identifies the following conservation actions to achieve these objectives: 1) Restore aquatic habitat complexity. 2) Restore floodplain connectivity. 3) Increase cover and extent of native riparian vegetation by restoring beaver on the landscape where social and environmental factors permit (per Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool). This project will help achieve goals outlined in the Dixie and Fishlake Land and Resource Management Plans by increasing diversity of plant and animal communities (Diversity IV-3), protecting and improving aquatic habitats (Wildlife and Fish, IV-3), improving habitat for sensitive, threatened and endangered species (Wildlife and Fish, IV-4), and maintaining or improving water quality and the productivity of streams and riparian areas (Soil and Water, IV-4). Other multi-agency plans this project will directly benefit include: State of Utah Beaver Management Plan, Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Bonneville Cutthroat Trout, Range-wide Conservation Agreement for Southern leatherside chub and the Boreal Toad Conservation Plan in the State of Utah. Examples of specific plan objectives include: UTAH STATEWIDE BEAVER MANAGEMENT PLAN The overall goal of the plan is to "Maintain healthy, functional beaver populations in ecological balance with available habitat, human needs, and associated species." Population Management explains that we should "obtain/maintain a basic picture of distribution/density of beaver in Utah, understand we will be working in human-altered habitat which requires management, and consider beaver colony distribution and abundance. The Watershed Restoration section notes that beaver are a good tool that could be used to restore degraded riparian communities. Watershed Restoration Strategy Number 4 states that UDWR regional personnel will coordinate with local governments, land management agencies, private landowners, and any other affected parties that have an interest (positive or negative) in the establishment of beaver populations within the translocation watershed. In addition, the management plan states in Objective 1 of Damage Management: Increase consistency in the response options (lethal and non-lethal) currently in use and increase the frequency of use of non-traditional options (e.g. beaver deceivers, livetrapping) used by UDWR, governmental and non-governmental agencies and landowners for managing beaver causing property damage." BOREAL TOAD CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE STATE OF UTAH: The goal of the Boreal toad Conservation Plan is to "maintain or restore multiple, viable breeding populations in nine of the 14 mountain ranges or geologic areas in Utah where boreal toad historically occurred ." The Plan identifies seven key Conservation Strategies including: "Identify and reduce threats from habitat loss and degradation (Habitat Management). RANGE-WIDE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT AND STRATEGY FOR BONNEVILLE CUTTHROAT TROUT (Lentsch et al. 2000): Strategy Objective II A) 1) Maintain or restore water quality to a degree that provides for stable and productive riparian and aquatic ecosystems; 2) Maintain or restore stream channel integrity, channel processes, and the sediment regime (including the elements of timing, volume, and character of sediment input and transport) under which the riparian and aquatic ecosystems developed; 5) Maintain or restore the diversity and productivity of desired plant communities in riparian zones; 6) Maintain or restore riparian vegetation to: c) help achieve rates of surface erosion, bank erosion, and channel migration characteristic of those under which the communities developed. CONSERVATION AGREEMENT AND STRATEGY FOR SOUTHERN LEATHERSIDE (Lepidomeda aliciae) IN THE STATE OF UTAH (UDWR 2010): Objective 3 - Identify, prioritize, and implement actions to reduce threats to southern leatherside populations and habitat and evaluate the effectiveness of these actions. Conservation Element B) 2) - Restore habitat where possible, creating habitat complexity and connectivity for southern leatherside. Conservation Element B) 3) - Implement habitat enhancements that may include some or all of the following: removal of diversion structures, modification of barriers to allow fish passage, bank stabilization, enhancement of native vegetation, riparian fencing, nonnative removal and implementation of compatible grazing practices. Conservation Element D) 4) -- Maintain natural hydrologic conditions. This project will also help Forestry Fire and State Lands accomplish objectives, according to the Utah Statewide Forest Resource Assessment and Strategy Guide 2010.

Healthy and robust riparian areas can provide a significant buffer against catastrophic effects of fires. Healthy riparian corridors mitigate against post-fire mudflows and restoration costs.The benefits of increased riparian vegetation communities may make an area more resilient to wildlife or at the least act as an efficient fire break. Examples of elements that could be protected by this kind of fire break include: permanent infrastructure, critical wildlife habitat, and private or government property via abating risk that fires will spread into urbanized areas. An additional fire-related component to the project is that beavers are taken to areas that have experienced fire damage for landscape rehabilitation.

The very function of beaver dams exemplifies increased water quality and quantity. The creation of ponds decelerates run off and stream flow, curtailing erosion and allowing stabilization of the stream banks. The pooling water additionally raises the water table, consequently creating meadows and riparian vegetation. This also keeps stored water cool underground, releasing water during drought conditions and extending the season of water flow. The filtering of sediment will leave cleaner watersheds downstream, which also benefits multiple species. Finally, many of the streams identified for beaver translocation or supplementation have a TMDL/303d listing or drain into streams with TMDL and 303d listing. Any listings related to temperature or sediment (TDS, Total P, low O/E score) would benefit from beaver dam complexes.

UDWR will consult with Federal partners if NEPA is required for installation of flow control devices on a case-by-case basis. Beaver relocations alone will not necessitate any archaeological clearances, and any NEPA is covered by the UDWR Beaver Management Plan. UDWR has jurisdiction over beaver in Utah as it is considered a furbearer. UDWR also has a statewide Stream Alteration Permit that allows action related to beaver trapping and translocation permissible under state law.

Up to three temporary/seasonal technicians will be hired to live-trap, monitor, and possibly relocate beavers. The live-trapping and relocating will occur late spring (when vegetation is grown enough to provide a substantial food source) through September 1st, unless otherwise approved through the UDWR Salt Lake Office (through proper procedure and written justification). Beavers will be taken to priority areas and translocation efforts will be coordinated by UDWR biologists, federal partners, local governments, and local water users. Utah State University's "Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool (BRAT) will be used in assessing the identified priority beaver areas using a new web application developed by the statewide UDWR GIS team. Cross referencing the agency identified translocation priority areas with the BRAT tool will be useful in detecting potential conflicts and in identifying areas that can support beaver. Calendar year 2022- 27 beavers moved from about 10 distinct locations. Relocations were focused on East Fork of Sevier, Robinson Canyon, Threemile Creek and Reservoir Canyon. Detailed report will be in FY23 closing report. One particular huge success was the movement of beavers into the Reservoir Canyon site on the Pine Valley Forest Service District. Rhett Boswell, Rowdy Walsh and Nick Glidden, along with others, worked for several years to get approval to move beavers into the Pine Valley Wilderness, post fire, since they may be one of the only methods of stream restoration work in wilderness. Horses were used to pack the beavers, inside large transport tubes with ice and burlap for comfort. See photos and video of release in images section.

UDWR employees will be assessing the impacts of the project through visiting all sites where beaver are transplanted and communicating with other agencies (USFS, BLM, FFSL, etc.), local residents and trappers, as well as other volunteer agencies to ensure beneficial results. The UDWR will monitor the relocation sites that are utilized and address any conflicts that may have occurred due to the translocation. Repeat photography will be used to illustrate changes to the landscape due to beaver activity, once the resident sites are observed. The utilization of VHF transmitters will assist in the monitoring process. Though three receivers have been secured so seasonal technicians will have full access to receivers to monitor when possible, other sections of the DWR and other agencies may also have receivers to be utilized at times. In addition, DWR performs classification flights for big game, and we could capitalize on that opportunity to have biologists on the flights perform some telemetry as well. Furthermore, the Dixie has Riparian Level II inventory sites along many of the potential translocation sites and can assess changes in greenline vegetation related to reintroductions. UDWR and Forest Service annually monitor boreal toad breeding activity and distribution on the Paunsaugunt. UDWR and Forest Service just completed BCT sampling in the East Fork Sevier River drainage in 2015 and will reassess BCT populations in the drainage by 2022. As there are already active monitoring efforts for boreal toad and cutthroat trout species between the DWR and USFS, we can compile additional data about the benefits of beaver dams for these species. The DWR is also currently executing annual surveys to evaluate the success of overwintering trout in Deer Creek and Moosman relocation sites. Other issues already evaluated by USFS are incision and floodplain components; DWR will work with USFS biologists to identify where improvements have been made to these components via beaver dams. DWR will also continue to communicate with USFS regarding the results from the current forest monitoring for riparian health. For any locations that are not currently undergoing surveys, outside agencies could be contacted to request monitoring on one or more relocation sites. Fall 2022, monitoring was conducted at all release sites for the release sites for the past several years. Some beavers were located, but sign was apparent at all locations. Summary will be included in the FY23 closing report. Wildlands Network has worked with the Powell District of the Dixie National Forest in increased monitoring, particularly in the East Fork release area on the Paunsaugunt Plateau. Jake Schoppe and his staff have put in vast work installing cameras, and checking the site. The captured video of soil deposits post storm surge, that shows a beaver dam structure catching sediment that would have otherwise collected in Tropic Reservoir, reducing future storage capacity for downstream water users. (See images section, video)

Forest Service, BLM, NGO's and Division of Wildlife Resources have worked together to develop the Beaver Management Plan and to formulate a list of translocation sites, translocations, monitoring, and other trapping/translocation needs as necessary. In the development of the Beaver Management Plan, advisory committee members included: Utah Trappers Association, Forest Service, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Utah Cattlemen's Association, Utah Farm Bureau, Grand Canyon Trust, BLM, Wildlife Services, DWR. This committee developed this plan including the relocation processes and suitable translocation sites. It was then taken to the RAC and Wildlife Board for approval. Before determining a relocation site, DWR contacts the pertinent public lands agency, county commissioners irrigation owners, and any other private property owners that might be affected. After discussing the project with Habitat Council committee members and learning that other regions would like to acquire beavers from our region, we have agreed to share beavers across regions, if requested. This project applies to multiple aspects listed in the State of Utah RPM. Some examples include: - Cooperate in the protection, restoration, enhancement and management of water resources in the State of Utah to the extent of each agency's authority, expertise, and resources. - Expand wildlife populations and conserve sensitive species by protecting and improving wildlife habitat - Work with stakeholders and partners to continue to implement recommendations from the Utah Wildlife Action Plan 2015--2025 to conserve sensitive species and their habitat. - Prioritize and manage riparian areas to attain desired future conditions for riparian-related resources (e.g. fishery habitat, water quality, wildlife and livestock forage, and soil stability).

As the Statewide Beaver Management Plan is instated until the need for revision presents itself (changed from the 2020 end date), the UDWR will continue to apply for funding to transplant beavers every year. Future management in terms of monitoring is explained in the Monitoring section, and any other future management regarding population, AIS, nuisance issues, harvest management, watershed restoration, and/or research is illuminated in the plan. Additionally, the Paunsaugunt is closed to trapping until future recommendations are made, which increases possibility of survival for beavers released at those sites. UDWR and the Dixie National Forest are in the process of developing a Conservation Action Plan for the Paunsaugunt Plateau population of boreal toad, which will have a large focus on increasing and maintaining beaver populations on the Plateau. Additionally UDWR and the Forest Service are signatories to the BCT and Southern leatherside chub Conservation Agreements and Strategies. As such both agencies are committed to healthy watersheds, riparian areas and stream habitats where these species occur and encouraging and maintaining beaver support those commitments. The Forest Service is currently in the process of implementing additional vegetation management to increase woody browse for long-term maintenance and the expansion of beaver populations, subsequent to the short-term habitat priorities in the CAP for Paunsaugunt Boreal Toads. The short-term habitat projects were achieved via WRI Project 3631 and Forest Service funding, so the continuation of these strategies will bolster beaver habitat. In return, beaver translocations reinforce the CAP goals, creating a symbiotic situation between an action plan and WRI project. Fishlake National Forest translocation sites are highlighted in this proposal with the anticipation of replicating the outcome of the Dixie Forest sites where Boreal Toads are thriving as a result of beaver ponds (i.e. Sevier River; Podunk Guard Station - see images). Finally, the Boreal Toad Conservation Plan lists beaver ponds are one of the breeding habitats utilized by boreal toads in Utah. In addition, the Habitat Management portion of the Monitoring section explicates that minimizing habitat loss and degradation associated with water management and creating, restoring and maintaining new habitats through water management are key factors to the success of the plan. Translocated beavers have produced dams which have led to the breeding and egg laying habitat that boreal toads are currently utilizing on the Paunsaugunt, therefore bolstering the toad's conservation plan and increasing overall population health. This plan will continue to influence future management of this project. In some cases this project will help support and increase the success of past UWRI projects. For example the Horse Creek/ Birch Creek reintroduction will add benefits to Ranch Creek Phases I, II and III (3946, 5229, and 5674) and potentially benefit future BCT reintroductions.

Beaver provide a host of ecosystem services including: water purification, moderation of extreme events, habitat and biodiversity provision, nutrient cycling, greenhouse gas sequestration, recreational hunting and fishing, water supply, and non-consumptive recreation. These services have been shown to significant financial value by several studies (see Ecosystem Northwest 2011 and Thompson et al 2021 in documents upload section). Beaver, as ecosystem engineers, can increase the amount of forage for wild and domestic ungulates. This project is not designed specifically to benefit livestock but may provide secondary benefits by improving the diversity and availability of riparian vegetation. Range conservationists from the USFS adjust stocking rates based on conditions. If conditions of the stream improve, there is no justification for lowering AUMs as the area will have become more resilient and productive. Other sustainable uses of the resource would include providing an opportunity for anglers to fish in the beaver ponds (trout). Additionally, more water in the system will be available for irrigation, and the wet meadows produced by beaver dams will enhance habitat for big game, thus hunting opportunity. This would occur due to the dams' abilities to store and cool water underground, releasing water in drier conditions to help sustain a consistency to the water flow, and slowing snow melt and run off, which also extends the season of water flow. In addition, the creation of ponds and filtration of sediment can create additional fishing opportunities -- the resulting wet meadows would foment utilization by big game, which may enhance hunting and wildlife viewing opportunities, as waterfowl, upland game, furbearers, big game and other species. Multiple species benefitting from this project (BCT, CRCT, sage grouse) have been petitioned for listing under ESA multiple times. Projects like this have helped alleviate the factors that would warrant listing allowing for all other multiple use activities (grazing, timber harvest, etc) to continue without additional regulation and oversight from USFWS.

07/01/2023

06/30/2024

2024

Two seasonal technicians were hired for the project including Bryce Griffin and Bridger Hubble. The project also paid for two seasonal vehicles which are crucial to the success of the program. From July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, traps were set at nuisance complaint areas including: Joseph canals Mammoth Creek Kolob Road- Sunset Ranch Santa Clara Mathis Park Santa Clara Tonaquint Park Rockville Gooseberry Lost Creek Kingston Beaver River Richfield Golf Course Richfield canals Black Canyon Additional beavers came from holding facility at Utah State University The live traps used were Hancock or Koro style traps. Each trap was secured with a cable and rebar stake, and baited with gland or lure and vegetation. Traps were checked each morning, and reset for the following evening. Before each site was trapped, notes were made about the complaint in a Google sheet for record keeping. Teresa Griffin or Mindi Cox contacted Forest Service biologist and other stakeholders on the trapping and release sites. All captured nuisance beaver were held in quarantine at the SRO facility and processed by DWR vet Virginia Stout, Teresa Griffin, Mindi Cox, and countless other employees and volunteers. VHF Transmitters were attached to healthy adult beavers. Beavers were fed each day with fresh willow and aspen, had water changes done each morning, and mister systems turned on in the morning to keep the ambient temperature cooler. During the heat of the day, beavers congregate in the shade under a ramp or inside a metal barrel, which allows them to dry out completely, so they are utilizing clean water each evening. Once beavers were caught, arrangements were made with technicians and Forest Service personnel to relocate the beavers. The Forest Service spent approximately $10,000 in-kind dollars assisting with beaver translocation and monitoring efforts. The Division of Wildlife Resources staff (not including beaver technicians) spent approximately $7,000 in-kind dollars with processing, translocation, and monitoring efforts. Volunteers contributed approximately $2,000 in-kind. Utah State University contributed this year, giving the Southern Region several beavers, even driving them to Cedar City. Wildland Network contributed at least $5000 also assisted in site assessment, monitoring, camera traps, report compilations and networking with UDWR/FS. Throughout this project, most beavers were "processed;" meaning they were given tail transmitters, oxygen levels, respiration rate and heart rate monitored, identified gender, measured, weighed and given an approximate age and body condition score. The VHF tail transmitters have shown us survival and movement post translocation. Kits were not given tail transmitters because of the size of their tails relative to the transmitters. We have identified some beavers as "alive" and some that have died throughout this process. However, there are still multiple beavers we have been unable to locate since VHF transmitters were attached; we are still actively searching for these frequencies through surveys performed by Forest Service, Division of Wildlife biologists and seasonal technicians. Habitat surveys of release site are conducted each fall to see if habitat is being modified by beavers. No beaver detected does not mean beavers are not present, so looking for recent sign and habitat modification is important, since that is the end goal of this project.

FY24 was a difficult year hiring (during the 2023 portion of the year) due to low wages, and high costs of living in the Cedar City or St. George areas. Heavy monsoon season also made it difficult to keep the trap lure fresh. One trap was stolen in the Gooseberry area. Due to several difficulties, only 14 beavers were trapper during this fiscal year, which is a decrease of 16 from the previous year. One additional beaver was caught but died from trap or capture mortalities. Often we must issue kill trap permits to complaints during the winter months or if we can accommodate live trapping. Kill trapping does not factor in this figure which was a necessary DWR action in areas where beaver are not tolerated due to threats to fishery infrastructure or other nuisance events. This year with two technicians, we were able to accommodate most nuisance calls and deploy adequate trap-set days. We have noticed an increase in public satisfaction when we quickly address or resolve beaver nuisance issues, and conduct concurrent trapping in multiple known beaver nuisance areas. Beavers were released in the following drainages during FY24: Threemile Creek (Panguitch Unit) Reservoir Canyon (Pine Valley Wilderness) Bunker Creek (Panguitch Unit)) Kanab Creek Monitoring has occurred at many of the past release location searching for live beavers or sign that they are beginning to construct dam features. We are gaining more support from counties and private landowners who see the benefits from beavers. We hope to increase documentation of released beavers and additional benefits to riparian vegetation. One area that continues to responde exceptionally well is the East Fork of the Sevier. A fire occurred in this drainage spring of 2022, and Wildlife Biologist Jake Schoppe with the Powell District of the FS documented debris flow being caught by beaver dam structures in late summer of 23, widening over the flood plain and depositing debris, performing the very actions, collecting sediment and slowing the flow like we have hoped this project would do! This helps save water capacity at downstream Tropic Reservoir by eliminating the additional sediment. Additionally Jake had seasonal employees assist with trapping, releasing and monitoring of beavers, not to mention making educational videos and a camera study. Wildlands Network communicated with the Powell District of the FS and monitored cameras along the East For of the Sevier also. They submitted a report in 2023 which is available to review if requested. The Pine Valley District of the Forest Service had a huge contribution this year, building unique beaver transport tubes that can be mounted on horseback, and taken into the Pine Valley Wilderness, where beavers may be the only stream restoration tool available to the fire scoured Reservoir Canyon. We are thrilled to report that summer of 2024, beaver activity and dam construction were found. This is a year after the last beavers were taken to the area. This may seem like a small success, but it's a huge win to have beavers modifying habitat and doing exactly what this project funded for. See images for post release images of Reservoir Canyon, showing beaver activity. Forest Service employees also are reporting finding continued beaver activity and stream modification of the Little Creek stream. The last beavers that were relocation in that area was early spring of 2023 (FY23). Working closely internally with staff in both the habitat and aquatics section, as well as the local Forest Service biologists, we are starting to develop a longer term "priority list" and attempt to "super saturate" a drainage with beavers each year, as to enhance and give the beavers the best shot of successfully establishment. 2024 priority area is Threemile area on the Panguitch, still recovering from the impacts of the Brian Head fire. (FY24 does include other release sites). Once we feel we have released adequate beavers in one area, we will move onto additional priorities. Once again, this does demonstrate the communication, coordination and partnerships between the different sections within the DWR as well as with our federal partners. We would like to applaud the partnership that DWR has with the federal biologists, without them and their support, this project wouldn't be possible. Their willingness to always help, or offer their technicians to support transporting beavers, or doing telemetry is priceless when we are all busy and stretched thin. Threemile Creek, which headwaters were burned during the Brian Head fire, also look like pools and small dams are improving riparian vegetation. Cedar District FS employees joined us in beaver releases. Wildland Network has also joined the partnership and is assisting DWR and FS in planning, monitoring and evaluating sites. Many volunteers have got involved in the project, from SUU students to community members, as well as USU beaver project members. Beavers have been taken to schools to educate students on the benefits of beavers prior to their release. Several private landowners lands have been evaluated and would like to receive beavers on their property, when available. The partnerships continue to grow between agencies and the communities and we continue this project. Utah State University also gave us 5 beavers they had in their quarantine facility and did not have release areas for. And the biggest thanks goes to the beavers, actual live beavers, that are doing the continued riparian restoration. Leave it to the beavers.... THANK YOU PARTNERS! A small trailer was purchased with year end project funds to safely transport beavers and traps. Additional traps and bait were also purchased for the program.

Since we've acquired the VHF transmitters, we plan to continue to track the signals to better assess and document survival and telemetry. Monitoring efforts will attempt to search all drainages that we have moved beavers with transmitters over the past several years- as well as FY24. During monitoring surveys, biologists will also search for recent beaver sign, and habitat modification from beavers. Though we would like to utilize GPS telemetry, at this time, it would be almost completely ineffective (ATS quotes "three percent success rate") due to beavers being under water and in lodges so much of the time. However, we will continue looking for new technologies for tracking beaver movements with a higher efficacy rate at a more reasonable cost. We hope to consult with Julie Young (USU) regarding latest techniques and additional monitoring options. Future considerations will be made if we continue the use of tail tag receivers due to high failure rates. It appears that monitoring riparian habitat and searching for recent beaver activity in a drainage, is a good indicator of "success" of past relocation efforts. Lytle Ranch manager has also contacted us with a desire to reintroduce beavers into Beaver Dam Wash on BYU property. Flows seem to be low, and water rights issues will need to be discussed as well as conversations with adjacent landowners who may divert water. Deeper pools and escape cover would be beneficial prior to any beaver releases in this area. This could also be a beneficial place to release beavers later in the season when temperatures are slightly lower, vegetation is still available and the threat of monsoonal flood is lessened. Additionally, Wahweep Creep or Kanab Creek in lower elevations may be options for late season releases, where vegetation is still available. This could be an option to continue live trapping rather than issuing lethal permits. The Pine Valley Forest Service had been working for several years with Washington County politicians, water users and private landowners to get approval to reintroduce beavers into the Pine Valley wilderness, where beavers may be the only options for stream restoration work. In FY23, we achieved one of the goals we had been working towards for years, by being able to horse pack four beavers into Reservoir Canyon. During FY24, we took additional beaver by horse pack into the headwaters, and will continue monitoring establishment of beavers. On a positive note, Pine Valley Forest Service biologists found beaver dam establishment and fresh sign this summer! This is a huge success. Enough gratitude cannot be shown to all the supporters, partners, contributors and the beavers for moving this project forward.