Utah Participation in the Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program - FY24
Project ID: 6701
Status: Completed
Fiscal Year: 2024
Submitted By: 2760
Project Manager: Steve Meismer
PM Agency: Virgin River Program
PM Office: St. George
Lead: Virgin River Program
WRI Region: Southern
Description:
The Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program is a cooperative effort among the state of Utah, the Washington County Water Conservancy District, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Dixie Conservation District, Washington County Farm Bureau, The Nature Conservancy, and the U.S. Forest Service. The Program's goals are to recover, enhance, protect, and conserve native species while ensuring water development can continue.
Location:
The project area covers the Upper Virgin River Basin in Utah including the North Fork and East Fork Virgin rivers,Virgin and Santa Clara rivers, La Verkin and Ash creeks, Ft. Pearce and Beaver Dam washes and other small tributaries to these larger streams. Extending from above Zion National Park the watershed is comprised of streams fed by snowmelt runoff moving downstream to Arizona and Nevada.
Project Need
Need For Project:
Utah Participation in the Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program","The Virgin River chub, woundfin, flannelmouth sucker, and Virgin spinedace are endangered or sensitive fish species that once thrived in the Virgin River system. Habitat modification and the introduction of nonnative fish changed the river environment and put these fish at risk. Established in 2001, the Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program is a partnership of public and private organizations working to recover these endangered species while allowing continued and future water development. The Southwestern willow flycatcher was recently added to the program's goals as the program takes an ecosystem approach to conservation and recovery that includes tamarisk removal and reintroduction of native riparian species.","The overall goals of the Program are to enhance, protect, conserve, and recover native species and to enhance the ability to provide adequate water supplies to meet human needs. Partners are committed to the conservation and recovery of the target species and support program efforts with in-kind services and funding.
Objectives:
The factors that lead to the current status of the Virgin River species are numerous and complex. The Program has implemented a multi-faceted approach in an effort to manage the threats posed by these factors which results in many projects being conducted simultaneously in a given year. The Program has five Program Elements that each project falls under: 1) provide and protect instream flows; 2) protect and enhance aquatic and riparian and 100-year floodplain habitat; 3) maintain genetically appropriate brood stocks; 4) determine ecological factors limiting abundance of native fish species; 5) monitor habitat conditions and populations of native fish and avian species; and 6) improve education and communication on resource issues. It is through coordinated implementation of activities within these broad categories that Program members strive to achieve recovery. ","Monitoring for fish population and actions occur based on specific project objectives, however the main monitoring activities include: Full pass monitoring from La Verkin Hot Springs to Stateline fish barrier (twice annually) Recovery Team Sampling: Conducted in 10 locations from Utah to Nevada (twice annually) Population Response Stations: Monthly (10 periods, Nov/Dec and Jan/Feb combined) Flycatcher sampling includes nest establishment, success, fledgling counts, brown-headed cowbird control and vegetation monitoring around nest sites. Regular nonnative fish sampling is conducted throughout the basin
Project Location/Timing Justification (Why Here? Why Now?):
Currently portions of our area of influence are near ecological thresholds due to drought and water temperatures that are affecting species. We have to date been able to manage instream flows to help counter both flow and temperature issues and have some potential other plans to deal with water quality in the future. Other areas are currently in good shape and efforts to maintain those areas are considerably more cost effective than addressing future losses to species and condition. Working cooperatively with partners on both those species that are at threshold levels those that are in better conditions will ultimately lead to more successful outcomes than being forced to list species and habitat. Positive cooperative efforts is the goal of the Virgin River Program and has been successful to date.
Relation To Management Plan:
The Virgin River Program functions to meet its goals while complying with numerous state, federal and local management plans including but not limited to: - Virgin River Fishes Recovery plan (USFWS) - Virgin Spinedace Conservation Agreement and Strategy (UDWR) - Virgin River Watershed Plan (WCWCD) - Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Recovery Plan (USFWS) - BLM St. George RMP (BLM) - City of St. George Erosion Hazard and floodplain ordinances (St. George) - City of Washington Erosion Hazard and floodplain ordinances (Washington ) - Zion National Park General Management Plan (NPS)
Fire / Fuels:
For many years the Virgin River Program has worked with many state and local entities to manage the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) that is represented by the riparian forest adjacent to the Virgin River and its tributaries. By removing portions of nonnative species such as tamarisk and replacing them with native species, not only is the fire threat reduced, but we are moving the environment back to a more natural state.
Water Quality/Quantity:
Working with the Washington County Water Conservancy District (WCWCD) the Virgin River Program has been able to address short term quantity and quality problems in the Virgin River and based on other agreements, more long term issues as well. However with the ongoing impacts of climate change and drought, more will need to be done. Without the cooperation of the WCWCD as well as other partners within the Virgin River Program the maintenance of the native and endangered species of the Virgin River would not be possible. The cooperation is the only means to have the possibility of achieving recovery and preventing other species from being listed.
Compliance:
The Program is a coalition of agencies and organizations that came together initially in 2001 to conserve and recover sensitive and endangered Virgin River basin fish and provide for future water development for agricultural, hydroelectric and municipal uses. The effort involves federal, state, local and private organization and agencies in Utah. The Program complies with all applicable laws, including the federal Endangered Species Act, state water laws, river laws and interstate water compacts.
Methods:
The factors that lead to the current status of the Virgin River species are numerous and complex. The Program has implemented a multi-faceted approach in an effort to manage the threats posed by these factors which results in many projects being conducted simultaneously in a given year.
Monitoring:
Monitoring for fish population and actions occur based on specific project objectives, however the main monitoring activities include: Full pass monitoring from La Verkin Hot Springs to Stateline fish barrier (twice annually) Recovery Team Sampling: Conducted in 10 locations from Utah to Nevada (twice annually) Population Response Stations: Monthly (10 periods, Nov/Dec and Jan/Feb combined) Flycatcher sampling includes nest establishment, success, fledgling counts, brown-headed cowbird control and vegetation monitoring around nest sites. Regular nonnative fish sampling is conducted throughout the basin
Partners:
Program partners include: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington County Water Conservancy District Utah Department of Natural Resources U.S. Bureau of Land Management U.S. National Park Service The Nature Conservancy Private Landowners U.S. Forest Service Dixie Conservation District Washington County Farm Bureau Additional cooperators include: City of St. George City of Santa Clara La Verkin City, City of Hurricane Springdale Town Washington City Washington County Washington County Flood Control Authority Shivwits Band of the Paiute
Future Management:
Management of these species, particularly those currently listed as endangered will need to continue for a number of years. Knowledge is being gained and actions taken through adaptive management are showing to be successful. The ability to keep additional species off of the federal endangered species list is positive and beneficial to the local communities. Currently the communities are positively engaged in helping to reduce impacts to the environment and work cooperatively with the Virgin River Program.
Sustainable Uses of Natural Resources:
N\A
Budget WRI/DWR Other Budget Total In-Kind Grand Total
$1,080,000.00 $360,000.00 $1,440,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $2,940,000.00
Item Description WRI Other In-Kind Year
Other BLM funds for riparian restoration, repair/replace fish barriers, population monitoring $350,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Other Overall activities of VIrgin River Program. $730,000.00 $360,000.00 $1,500,000.00 2024
Funding WRI/DWR Other Funding Total In-Kind Grand Total
$1,080,000.00 $360,000.00 $1,440,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $2,940,000.00
Source Phase Description Amount Other In-Kind Year
BLM IRA A191 Mod 15 $350,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Species Protection Account E201 $730,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024
Washington Co. Water Conservancy District Contributions include: USFWS - 360,000 of 730,000 Obligated WCWCD In-kind (water) 1,500,000 TNC - 70,000 $0.00 $360,000.00 $1,500,000.00 2024
Species
Species "N" Rank HIG/F Rank
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) Medium
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Medium
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Improper Grazing – Livestock (current) High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native Very High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
OHV Motorized Recreation Medium
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Presence of Diversions High
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Salinity Alteration (of water) Low
Desert Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Unintentional Spread of Non-native Species Low
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native Very High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Presence of Dams High
Flannelmouth Sucker N3
Threat Impact
Presence of Diversions Very High
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation Low
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Feral Domesticated Animals Low
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Insects – Alien Organisms Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Problematic Animal Species – Native Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Medium
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher N1
Threat Impact
Storms and Flooding Low
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Very High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Very High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Natural Rarity High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Presence of Diversions High
Virgin Chub N1
Threat Impact
Salinity Alteration (of water) Medium
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) Medium
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Medium
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Groundwater Pumping Low
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Very High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native Very High
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Natural Rarity Medium
Virgin Spinedace N2
Threat Impact
Presence of Diversions High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Droughts Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Invasive Wildlife Species - Non-native Very High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Natural Rarity High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Presence of Diversions High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network High
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Salinity Alteration (of water) Medium
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Unintentional Spread of Non-native Species Low
Woundfin N1
Threat Impact
Water Allocation Policies High
Habitats
Habitat
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation Low
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Roads – Transportation Network Medium
Aquatic-Forested
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Unknown
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation Low
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Housing and Urban Areas Medium
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Increasing stream temperatures Unknown
Aquatic-Scrub/Shrub
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Agricultural / Municipal / Industrial Water Usage Very High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Brush Eradication / Vegetation Treatments Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Channelization / Bank Alteration (direct, intentional) High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Conversion from Flood to Sprinkler Irrigation Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Dam / Reservoir Operation Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
Droughts High
Riverine
Threat Impact
Increasing Stream Temperatures Unknown
Riverine
Threat Impact
Invasive Plant Species – Non-native Medium
Riverine
Threat Impact
OHV Motorized Recreation Low
Riverine
Threat Impact
Temperature Extremes Unknown
Project Comments
Comment 08/13/2024 Type: 2 Commenter: Alison Whittaker
This is just a reminder that completion reports are due August 31st. I have entered the expenses in the Through WRI/DWR column on the finance page. Please do not make any changes to numbers in the Through WRI/DWR column. Any "Through Other" or "In-kind" expenses will need to be entered by the PM or contributors. Update your map features and fill out the completion form. Be sure to click on the finalize button on the completion report when you have your completion report ready to be reviewed by WRI Admin. Don't forget to upload any pictures of the project you have of before, during and after completion. If you have any questions about this don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Comment 02/26/2024 Type: 3 Commenter: Chelcey Larsen
Programs E4Z240E21, E4Z241A53 ,
Completion
Start Date:
07/01/2023
End Date:
06/30/2024
FY Implemented:
2024
Final Methods:
Methodology for project completion was as described in the initial application. The Program has implemented a multi-faceted approach in an effort to manage the threats posed by these factors which results in many projects being conducted simultaneously in a given year. The Program has six Program Elements that each project falls under: 1) provide and protect instream flows; 2) protect and enhance aquatic and riparian and 100-year floodplain habitat; 3) maintain genetically appropriate brood stocks; 4) determine ecological factors limiting abundance of native fish species; 5) monitor habitat conditions and populations of native fish and avian species; and 6) improve education and communication on resource issues. It is through coordinated implementation of activities within these broad categories that Program members strive to achieve recovery. ","Monitoring for fish population and actions occur based on specific project objectives, however the main monitoring activities include: Full pass monitoring from La Verkin Hot Springs to Stateline fish barrier (twice annually) Recovery Team Sampling: Conducted in 10 locations from Utah to Nevada (twice annually) Population Response Stations: Monthly (10 periods, Nov/Dec and Jan/Feb combined) Flycatcher sampling includes nest establishment, success, fledgling counts, brown-headed cowbird control and vegetation monitoring around nest sites. Regular nonnative fish sampling is conducted throughout the basin
Project Narrative:
The Virgin River chub, woundfin, flannelmouth sucker, and Virgin spinedace are endangered or sensitive fish species that once thrived in the Virgin River system. Habitat modification and the introduction of nonnative fish changed the river environment and put these fish at risk. Established in 2001, the Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery Program is a partnership of public and private organizations working to recover these endangered species while allowing continued and future water development. The Southwestern willow flycatcher was added to the program's goals as the program takes an ecosystem approach to conservation and recovery that includes tamarisk removal and reintroduction of native riparian species. The overall goals of the Program are to enhance, protect, conserve, and recover native species and to enhance the ability to provide adequate water supplies to meet human needs. Partners are committed to the conservation and recovery of the target species and support program efforts with in-kind services and funding. Via the methodology above, the Program has maintained all endangered species in the Virgin River basin, the fish species despite some of the driest water years of note. While streamflows in the basin have not been good, that offered a significant opportunity in dealing with the nonnative red shiner at the tail end of the 2021 ESMF year. The Program in conjunction with Arizona Dept. of Fish and Game was able to treat the Virgin River with rotenone, successfully completing Step 6 of the stepwise shiner eradication begun in 1988. To date, no red shiner have been found in the Virgin River above the Gorge Fish Barrier. Thus eliminating one of the largest threats to the endangered fish species. Stocking of both woundfin and Virgin River chub have occurred in the last year, with over 5,000 of both species entering the river. Monitoring of Southwestern Willow Flycatcher of is showing development of new habitat areas that are near to being acquired by Program partners. Local flycatcher populations have been lower in the last few years and have not been impacted by tamarisk beetles, but have been successful in fledging young among about four locations near St. George. Cooperation between the Program and other entities has continued including work with UDOT, City of St .George, Shivwits Band of the Paiute, City of Santa Clara and Washington County to name a few. A new lease for instream water with the Shivwits Band was finished in May 2022 for an additional five years with a great amount of help and funding by The Nature Conservancy and WCWCD. Efforts by USFWS has resulted in the Shivwits being online to receive $3M that was intended to be delivered in 2002 as part of the Santa Clara Water Rights Settlement. Some articles showing VRP efforts in the local paper can be found at: https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2024/04/04/agl-in-case-of-catastrophic-event-400-endangered-fish-given-new-home-at-ivins-golf-course/?fbclid=IwY2xjawEppuZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHbcxex7-HCfRSSVKANniQs1Kiy6z-HX-6SS60U0camXzHiNB9gfXvzVmjQ_aem_2yBIR8zP1RdLrNiuLmlq7w https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2024/06/14/agl-every-bird-counts-southern-utah-biologist-seeks-rare-species-in-dense-foliage/?fbclid=IwY2xjawEpp2FleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHW4HlX4H7xgUeLfzI4_Dz2EHyF10BfovIxAYheIexNhZ_W_yTI_ddEbtYg_aem_bMcFaTuAPPOjDfhhcZxdkg
Future Management:
Management of these species, particularly those currently listed as endangered will need to continue for a number of years. Knowledge is being gained and actions taken through adaptive management are showing to be successful. The ability to keep additional species off of the federal endangered species list is positive and beneficial to the local communities. Currently the communities are positively engaged in helping to reduce impacts to the environment and work cooperatively with the Virgin River Program.
Map Features
ID Feature Category Action Treatement/Type
13901 Affected Area
Project Map
Project Map